title: current status of research project : assessment technology of advanced
DESCRIPTION
33rd APEC Transportation Working Group Tokyo, Japan October 10-14 2010. Title: Current Status of Research Project : Assessment Technology of Advanced Safety Vehicle in Korea Presenter’s Name: Economy: Republic of KOREA. Table of Contents. Overview - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Title: Current Status of Research Project : Assessment Technology of Advanced Safety Vehicle in Korea Presenter’s Name:Economy: Republic of KOREA
33rd APEC Transportation Working Group Tokyo, JapanOctober 10-14 2010
Page 2
Table of Contents
Overview Analysis of Accidents Vision and Goal Roadmap Research Activities Conclusions
Page 3
ASV Project Backgrounds
Demand for advanced safety vehicle to reduce accident casualties Application of information technology to develop advanced safety vehicle Development of safety assessment technology: Verify new technology,
eliminate unwanted effects, rapid commercialization Active participation in UN/ECE/WP.29 legislative activities
Page 4
Characteristics of Traffic Accidents(1) Trend of Accident Casualties
Slowdown of decreasing trend of fatalities(07): 6,166, Due to limitation of enforcement and education Sudden Increase in Injuries(07): Police(340 thousand), Insurance Co.(1.2 million)
YEAR
Safety belt, airbag
Enforcement, education
☞ New technology for drastic of casualties0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06
Fata
litie
s
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
Inju
red
FatalitiesInjured(Police)Injured(Insurance)
Page 5
Number of Fatalities by Collision Type EU 15* Number of Fatalities by Collision Type
Characteristics of Traffic Accidents(2)EU 15* Number of Accidents by Collision Type
Number of Accidents by Collision Type(Police, 2007)
Vehicle-Pedestrian
Single Vehicle
Vehicle-to-VehicleRear End Collision
Vehicle-to-Vehicle
Collision due to crossing or
turning
Vehicle-to-Vehicle
Head on Collision
Vehicle-to-Vehicleothers
7% 13%
37%
6%
18%
19%
Vehicle-Pedestrian
Single Vehicle
Vehicle-to-VehicleRear End Collision
Vehicle-to-Vehicle
Collision due to crossing or
turning
Vehicle-to-Vehicle
Head on Collision
Vehicle-to-Vehicleothers
7% 13%
37%
6%
18%
19%
Vehicle-Pedestrian
Single Vehicle
Vehicle-to-VehicleRear End Collision
Vehicle-to-Vehicle
Collision due to crossing or
turning
Vehicle-to-Vehicle
Head on Collision
Vehicle-to-Vehicleothers
4%
36.2%
22.4%
11.8%
16.9%
8.7%
V to V75%
V to P21%
Single V4% Other
0%
V to V75%
V to P11%
Single V25%
Other10%
Page 6
Characteristics of Traffic Accidents(3) Trend of Fatalities
Fleet change(Increase in SUV/RV): Small car to SUV/RV ratio• 0.08(late 1990’) ⇒ 0.68(mid 2000’)
Fatalities from collision(07): Frontal(534), rearend(729), lateral(1,039) Pedestrian fatalities(07): 37%(2,232) Fatalities in night time: daytime(2,567) < nighttime(3,300) Fatalities DUI: 991 Point of death(06): At scene(1,488), under treatment(2,443)
☞ Compatibility issue
☞ Prevention of pedestrian, nighttime, DUI accidents, efficient emergency
Fatalities wrt V-to-V accidents
Rear End, 729(28.6%)
Other, 249(9.8%)
Side Impact,1039(40.7%)
Head On, 534(20.9%)
※ DUI: Driving under Influence
Page 7
Vision, Goal and Subjects
Vision
Goal
Subjects
Development of Assessment Technology of Advanced Safety Vehicle
Contributing to “Reducing Traffic Casualties by Half”
1. Develop advanced safety vehicle technology 2. Strengthen safety regulations by developing assessment technology of advanced safety vehicle3. Establish regulatory system to promote & commercialize advanced safety vehicle
1. Project management, commercialization strategy & study on regulatory system 2. Develop assessment technology for active safety & driver assistance technology 3. Develop assessment technology for integrated safety technology with IT
Page 8
Institute: KATRI, HMC, SNU, etc. Period: Dec., 2009 ~ Oct., 2016(7 yr 10 m) Budget: 23,400 mWon(Gov-grant) (about 20 m$)
Over-view
year '09 ’10 ’11 ’12 ’13 ’14 ’15 ’16
Grants(won) 770 2,520 5,610 4,300 4,300 2,000 2,000 1,900
Goal Assessment Technology of Advanced Safety VehicleAssessment Technology of Advanced Safety Vehicle
Safety integrated
with IT
2009 2012 2017
Improve Active Safety
Technology
2014Vehicle compatibility Aggressiveness
of SUV
Rollover accidents Injury criteria D/B(1) Injury criteria D/B(2)
Active hood and bumper
ACC/AEBS
Speed-sensitive active head restraint
LDWS
Blind spot
AFLS
AEBS
LKS
Commercial vehicle ACC
Human factor for active safety Detect pedestrian
in nighttime
Emergency Rescue V2X LED communication Intersection based on
V2I communication Stability of integrated EMC V2X control system
Mitigate Casualties
ASV Project: Road Map & Budget
(1st Stage) (2nd Stage) (3rd Stage)
End of 1st year
Page 9
Target
Improve vehicle compatibility b/t passenger vehicle and multi-purpose vehicle by developing energy absorption technology in passenger vehicle structure in the event of frontal and side collision Develop assessment technology of vehicle compatibility
Outcome Develop simulation model in the event of passenger vehicle and MPV frontal and side collision. Assessment technology
Vehicle Compatibility
FE Model Simulations
Car to CarCrash Tests
1st Stage
Page 10
Target Develop assessment technology of speed-sensitive active head restraint to prevent neck injuries in rear-end collision
Outcome
Develop algorithm to assess pre-crash sensing to detect rear-end collision in advance, and activation mechanism Develop assessment technology of seat integrated with speed-sensitive active head restraint
Active Head Restraint
Test, Simulation and Develop.
Algorism
Speed-sensitiveActive Headrest
ECU
Rear Detect
Radar Signal
sensor
SVFV1 FV2
Page 11
Target Develop assessment technology of passenger vehicle ACC, commercial vehicle AEBS to improve vehicle stability
Outcome
Develop test procedures of AEBS and verify sensors Develop assessment algorithm of AEBS and AEBS assessment system Develop assessment technology of passenger vehicle ACC, commercial vehicle AEBS / international joint research / BC Analysis, economic feasibility
ACC & AEBS
AEBS: Automatic Emergency Braking System
Development of AEBS
Radar Sensor
Camera
Forward Vehicle
Front Detection (Radar & Camera Data Com.)
Warning(Alarn, Buzzer)
Engine/TM ECU
Sub Brake(Exhaust,TM)
Brake ECU
Cluster/Speaker
Main Brake Controller
ECU Algorism& H/W Development
Protocol Development(SAE J1939 CAN Com.)
controller
Page 12
Target Develop assessment technology of LDWS for inattentive drivers and blind spot detection system to warn drivers of vehicles in the blind spot
Outcome Develop assessment algorithm and system Develop assessment technology of LDWS / BSDS
LDWS / Blind Spot Detection
LDWS: Lane Departure Warning System
Speed-sensitiveActive Headrest
Page 13
Target Develop assessment technology of AFLS adjusting low beam under various driving environments
Outcome Develop assessment technology and draft safety regulations and test procedures
AFLS
AFLS: Adaptive Frontal Lamp System
Development of AFLS Lab. Test
Method
Installation Screen Lamp on Measurement
70 m 50 m
Target Move
Forward Visibility
Page 14
Target Develop assessment technology of emergency rescue system stability - accident location, time, vehicle information and injuries, etc.
Outcome
Develop algorithm of assessing crash severity based on EDR information Develop e-Post communication protocol and Build communication test bed Video-based monitoring and analysis of driver state Develop assessment technology
e-Post
e-Post: emergency rescue call
Passenger Status
Event Data(EDR)
Page 15
Applications Development Technologies
Commercialization and facilitation of compatibility technology, active head-restraint, commercial vehicle AEBS, etc.
• Add new technology in NCAP Major contribution to national agenda “Reducing traffic casualties by half”
Assessment Technologies Apply assessment technology to verify emerging technology Reflect assessment technology to global technical regulations and ECE
regulations in WP.29
• Vehicle compatibility, LDWS, AEBS Develop safety regulations and test procedures
• AFLS (highway mode). LDWS, AEBS, blind-detection system
Page 16
Expected Outcome Technological Aspects
Verify emerging technology and eliminate unwanted effect by developing assessment technology
Reflect results to domestic and international safety regulations(WP.29 ECE R & GTR)
Reduce traffic accidents Lead world vehicle market by improved technology
Socio-economic Aspects Contribute to new traffic system with assessment technology and safety
regulations Improve national status in traffic accident by drastic decrease
• AEBS(18%), LDWS(12%) Contribute to reduce CO2 by improving traffic congestions due to decrease in
accidents
Page 17
Thank you for your attention(Q & A)
Acknowledgement
This research was supported by a grant (09-Transport System-Furture-01) from Transportation System
Innovation Program funded by MLTM