tool path generation when roi{ana binti a firlfilment...
TRANSCRIPT
EFFECT OF TOOL PATH GENERATION WHEN MACHINING MOLD.CAVITY
ROI{ANA BINTI SARIP
A project report submitted in partial firlfilment of the
requirements for the award of the degree of
Master of Mechanical Engineering (Advanced Manufacturing Technology)
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
DECEMBER 2OO9
1V
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to express my sincere gratitude and grateful appreciation to my
main supervisor, Prof. Dr. Safian bin Sharif and my co-supervisor, Mr. Rozaimi bin
Mohd Saad for their guidance, encouragement, advice, motivation and friendship.
Without their support and trust, this thesis would not have been the same as presented
here.
I am also wanted to thank to all staff at Production Laboratory and Machine
Shop for their support and guidance throughout my research.
Thank you to Allah for giving me strength to accomplish this thesis.
ABSTRACT
Studies on the tool path generation for free form surface have been conducted
extensively and most of these studies were focused on the effect of tool path
generation on the tool wear and surface texture. In this study, the effect of tool path
generation on tool wear, surface finish, machining time and dimensional accuracy
were evaluated during ball end milling of a mold cavity. UGS CAD/CAM software
was used to simulate the tool path and actual during machining at various cutting
parameters was conducted on CNC machining centre to machine a concave shape of
the mold-cavity component. Workpiece of 6061 aluminium alloy and HSS ball end
mill were used in this study. Four types of tool path strategies were investigated;
they are Follow Periphery, Parallel Line, Concentric Arc and Radial Lines. Result
showed that the highest value of 0.04pm flank wear was obtained when using
Concentric Arc and the lowest value of 0.01pm was recorded with Parallel Line.
Follow Periphery tool path strategy demonstrates the shortest machining time of 115
min and radial line recorded the longest machining time of 352 min. Radial Line and
Follow Periphery recorded the lowest and highest surface roughness of 0.95pm and
2-76pm respectively. In average, the smallest error value in dimension was from
Radial Line strategy with 0.04% while the biggest effor was recorded using Follow
Periphery with 0.6%. Based on the result obtained, it can be concluded that Parallel
Line and Radial Line produce lower tool wear, smaller error in dimensional accuracy
and better in surface finish but longer in cutting time while Follow Periphery and
Concentric Arc produce shorter cutting time, higher tool wear, bigger error in
dimensional accuracy and poor in surface finish.
vt
ABSTRAK
Kajian terhadap penjanaan peqalanan matalat bagi permukaan pelbagai
bentuk telah djalankan secara meluas dan kebanyakan kajian tertumpu kepada kesan
ke atas penjanaan perjalan mata alat terhadap geometri mata alat dan tekstur
permukaan. Di dalam kajian ini, kesan penjanaan mata alat terhadap kehausan,
kemasan permukaan, masa pemesinan dan ketepatan dimensi telah dinilai sepanjang
menjalankan pemesinan kaviti acuan cekung. Perisian UGS CAD/CAM telah
digunakan untuk simulasi perjalanan mata alat dan pemesinan sebenar pada
pelbagai parameter pemotongan dengan menggunakan mesin berangka computer
berpusat. Bendakerja yang digunakan di dalam kajian ini adalah 6061 aluminium
alloy dan matalat pengisar bebola berhalaju tinggi. Empat jenis strategi perjalanan
matalat yang diselidik adalah Follow Periphery, Porallel Line, Concentric Arc dan
Radial Lines. Keputusan menunjukkan nilai tertinggi bagi kehausan rusuk adalah
0.04pm yang diperolehi dari Concentric Arc dan nilai terendah adalah 0.01pm dari
Parallel Line. Strategi perjalanan matalat Follow Periphery merupakan masa
pemesinan terpendek iaitu 115 minit dan Radial Line mencatatkan masa pemesinan
terpanjang iaitu 352 minit. Radial Line dan Follow Periphery mencatatkan bacaan
kekasaran permukaan terendah dan tertinggi iaitu masing-masing sebanyak 0.95pm
dan2.76 pm. Secara purata, nilai ralat terkecil di dalam dimensi adalah dat'' Radial
Line \aitu sebanyak 0.04% manakala ralat terbesar yang direkod adalah dari Follow
Periphery dengan 0.6%. Berdasarkan kepada keputusan yang dicapai, boleh
disimpulkan bahawa Parallel Line dan Radial Line menghasilkan kehausan matalat
yang rendah, ralat dimensi yang kecil dan kemasan permukaan yang baik tetapi
mengambil masa pemesinan yang panjang manakala Follow Periphery dan
Concentric Arc menghasilkan masa pemesinan yang pendek tetapi kehausan mataLat
yang tinggi, ralat yang besar di dalam ketepatan dimensi dan kemasan permukaan
yang kasar.
vll
CHAPTER
TABLE OF CONTENS
TITLE
DECLARATION
DEDICATION
ACKNOWLEDGEMMENTS
ABSTRACT
ABSTRAK
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLE
LIST OF FIGURE,S
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of Study
1.2 Problem Statement
1.3 Objectives of the Study
I.4 Scope of Work
1.5 Significant of the Study
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction
2.2 The Metal Cutting Process
2.3 Milling Operation
2.4 CAD/CAM
2.4.1 Cutter Path Strategy
2.4.2 Step Over
2.4.3 Gouging
2.5 Type of Cutting Tool
2.5.1 Ball End Mill
PAGE
1
2
aJ
J
tJ
4
5
6
7
9
10
11
t3
13
vlll
2.6
2.7
Material of Cutting Tool
2.6.1 High Speed Steel
Surface Finish
2.7.1 Method To Measure Surface Finish
2.7.2 Shape and Waviness of the Surface
2.7.3 Surface Roughness
2.7.4 Surface Finish in Milling
Tool Wear
2.8.1 Tool Wear Pattern in Ball Mill
METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Milling Machine
3.3 Cutting Tools
3.4 Workpiece Material
3.5 MeasurementEquipment
3.5.1 Tool Wear Measurement
3.5.2 Surface Roughness Measurement
3.5.3 Dimensional Accuracy Measurement
RESULT AND DATA ANALYSIS
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Tool Wear
4.3 Cutting Time
4.4 Surface Roughness
4.4.1 Six Location Result for Surface Finish
4-4-2 Flat, Flat to Curve and Curve
4.5 Average Value for Surface Finish
4.6 DimensionalAccuracy
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
t4
15
l5
T6
T6
t7
t7
18
2A
22
23
24
24
25
25
27
27
2.8
29
30
?)
34
34
35
36
37
48
49
1X
LIST OF TABLE
TABLE NO. TITLE PAGE
3.1 Spesification of the CNC Milling Machine 24
3.2 Tool spesification 24
3.3 Properties of 6061 aluminium alloy 25
3.4 Chemical composition of 6061 aluminium alloy (Wt%) 25
3.5 Spesification of Mitutoyo Formtracer 27
3.6 Specification of Coordinat Measuring Machine 28
4.I Tool wear pattern for Concentric Arc, Follow Periphery,Parallel line and Radial Line 31
4.2 Flank wear value for Concentric Arc, Follow Periphery,Parallel line and Radial Line 32
4.3 Data for actual and simulation time in machining 33
4.4 Surface finish dataat six locations 35
4.5 Surface finish data at flat, flat to curve and curveLocation 35
4.6 Surface finish data in average 37
4.7 Dimensional accuracy Dataatx, Y, Z axis for FollowPeriphery tool path strategy 39
4.8 Dimensional accuracy dataatX, Y, Z Axis for ParallelLine tool path strategy 4A
4.9 Dimensional accuracy dataat X, Yo Z axis for ConcentricArc tool path strategy 40
4.10 Dimensional accuracy data at X, Y, Z axis for RadialLine tool path strategy 4I
4.II Dimensional accuracy error data at X, Y, Z axis for FollowPeriphery tool path strategy 4I
4.12 Dimensional accuracy error data in average at X, Y andZ axis for Follow Periphery tool path strategy 42
4.13 Dimensional accuracy error data at X, Y and Z Axisfor Parallel Line tool path strategy 43
4.14 Dimensional acattacy enor datain average at X, YandZ axis for Parallel Line tool path strategy
4.15 Dimensional accuracy error data at X, Y andZ axisfor Concentric Arc tool path strategy
4.16 Dimensional accuracy error data in average at X, YandZ axis for Concentric Arc tool path strategy
4.I7 Dimensional accuracy error data at X, Y andZ axisfor Radial Line tool path strategy
4.18 Dimensional accuracy error data in average at X, Yand Z axis for Radial Line tool path strategy
43
44
45
46
46
X1
FIGURE NO.
2.t
2.2
z.J
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.10
2.IT
2.t2
2.t3
2.14
3.1
1)aaJ.J
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.r
LIST OF FIGURE
TITLE PAGE
Photomicrograph of partially formed chip 5
Schematic illustration of a two-dimensional cutting process 6
Milling process (a) Slab milling (b) End milling 7
Ball end mill 7
Modern Mold Design Flowchart 8
Cutter path strategies: (a) Single Direction Raster Strategy(One direction) (b) Raster (Ztg-ZaglBack and Forth) and(c) Spiral
Step over of milling operation
Scallop height
Over cut and under cut in NC machining
(a) Gouging with neighboring surface (b) Surface overlap(c) Surface gap T2
Geometrical characteristics of two flute ball mill 13
The shape, waviness and roughness ofa surface 17
An overview of the causes, mechanisms, types andConsequences of the tool wear 19
Different wear types observed at the cutting edges of
10
10
11
t2
the end-mill
Mold cavity
Methodology flow chart
Milling Machine
Ball Mill
Zeiss Axiotech-high power optical microscope
Mitutoyo Formtracer C S-5000
Coordinate Measuring Machine
The tool path strategy: (a) Follow Periphery (b) Parallel Line(c) Concentric Arc (d) Radial Lines
21
22
23
23
24
26
27
28
30
xll
4.2 Tool wear comparison for each tool path strategy 32
4.3 Tool path generation comparison for actual, simulation anderror machining time 33
4.4 Six location to measure the surface finish 34
4.5 Surface finish datafor comparison for flat, flatto curve andCurve area 36
4.6 Surface finish data for comparison in average 37
4.7 Point for dimensional accuracy in Z axis 38
4.8 Point for dimensional accuracy in X and Y axis 39
4.9 Dimensional accuracy er:ror in X, Y and Z axis forFollow Periphery tool path strategy 42
4.I0 Dimensional accuracy error in average at X, Y andZ axis for Follow Periphery tool path strategy 42
4.II Dimensional accuracy error at X, Y and Z axis forParallel Line tool path strategy 43
4.12 Dimensional accuracy error in average at X, Y andZ axis for Parallel Line tool path strategy 44
4.13 Dimensional accuracy error at X, Y and Z axis forConcentric Arc tool path strategy 45
4.I4 Dimensional accuracy error in average at X, Y andZ axis for Concentric Arc tool path strategy 45
4.1,5 Dimensional accuracy error at X, Y and Z axis forRadial Line tool path strategy 46
4.16 Dimensional accuracy error in average at X, Y andZ axis for Radial Line tool path strategy 47
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the study
Computer Aided Design/Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) is one
of the versatile tools used in engineering practice in many ways including drafting,
design, simulation, analysis and manufacturing. There are various applications of
existing CAD/CAM system whereby each application has its strength which is
usually targeted to a specific market and group of users. According to Ibrahim Zeid
(2005), CAD/CAM system is classified into four groups depending on the market
they serve, the tools, functionalities and flexibilities they provide. The four groups
are low end, mid range, high end and specialized.
Low-end systems are used for unsophisticated and simple product which
consists of small number of product and uncomplicated geometry. The user can focus
on basic geometry modeling and drafting such as AutoCAD, Autodesk Inventor and
CADKEY. The midrange system is for users who require complex modeling and a
large number of parts per product. Unlike low end system, midrange system support
design together with manufacturing application such as SolidWorks, Pro/E and
MasterCAM. High-end system supports modeling, analysis and manufacturing of
complex products such as airplains, cars and others. Examples of this high-end
system are Unigraphics, Parasolid, SDRC I-DEARS and CATIA (Ibrahim Zeid,
2005).
One of the most important technique in manufacturing is to produce a part
with free-fofin or parametric surfaces. Efficient machining of these surfaces has
become very important in many manufacturing industries, such as the automobile,
consumer electronics, die-making and toy industries (Jian-Zhong Yang et aL,2007).
2
Research on cutter path generation techniques has been carried extensively
over the past decade. Proper selection of cutter path strategy is crucial in achieving
desired and quality machined surfaces. Without considering the effect of cutter path
selection with adequate consideration of the machining outcome such as cutting
forces, vibration analysis, tool life, cutting temperature and workpiece surface
integrity, the result can lead to catastrophic cutter failure and therefore lead to
unnecessary waste of time, cost and poor surface quality (C. K Toh,20A4).
This study is conducted in order to gain a better understanding on the type ofcutter path strategies and their effect when ball end milling of mold cavity part.
1.2 Problem Statement
The development of the aeronautic and automobile industries brought new
technological challenges, related to the growing complexity of the products and the
new geometries modeled in Computer Aided Design (CAD) systems. These more
complex geometries impose new challenging manufacturing situation for milling of
moulds and stamping tools (R. Baptista,1999).
The utilization of Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machine to
manufacture complex surfaces has driven extensive research works especially in the
area of tool path generation. According to Cevdet Gologlu (2008), the
implementation and selection of cutting path strategies with appropriate cuffing
parameters have significant effect on surface roughness. Study on optimal tool path
generation has been aiming at achieving two conflicting objectives which is quality
and efficiency. Hui wen Li. et al, (20A1) reported that a large tool path interval
results in a rough surface while a small interval increases machining time, resulting in
the inefficient of the process.
Most of previous studies were focused on the effect of tool path generation on
tool geometry and surface texture. In this study, the effect of tool path generation on
tool wear, surface finish, machining time and dimensional accuracy is being
evaluated when ball end milling of mould cavity.
lJ
1.3 Objective of the study
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of various tool path
strategies via CAD/CAM on tool wear, surface finish, machining time and
dimensional accuracy of a mold cavity.
1.4 Scope of work
The scope of the study covers the following aspects:
1. UGS CAD/CAM software was use to run the simulation and
experiment with selected cutting parameters.
2. MAHO 7005 CNC machining centre was used to machine the mold-
cavity component.
3. 6061 aluminium alloy was selected as the workpiece.
4. High Speed Steel (HSS) ball end mill was used as the cutting tool.
5. Focus on the study was on finishing operation.
6. Cutting conditions such as cutting speed, feed rate and depth of cut
were kept constant.
1.5 Significant of the Study
It is expected that the study will contribute to the following achievement:
1. Better understanding on the effects of tool path generation when ball
end milling a mold-cavity part.
2. Proposed predictive results that can be achieved by using UGS
software that is currently used in Production laboratory, Faculty of
Mechanical Engineering, UTM.
3. Established the tool path generation and their outcomes when milling
6061 aluminium alloy.
49
REFERENCES
A. Hatna, R.J. Grieve, P. Broomhead (1998). Automatic CNC milling of pockets:
geometric and technological issue. Computer lntegrated Manufacturing System
1 1 (4) 309-330.
Cevdet Gologlu, Nazim Sakarya (2008). The ffict of cutter path strategies on
surface roughness of pocket milling of 1.2738 steel based on Taguchi Method.
Journal of Materials Processing Technology 206 7-15.
C. K. Toh (2004). A study of the fficts of cutter path strategies and orientations in
milling. Journal of Materials Processing Technology I52 346-356.
C.L li (2007). A geometric approach to boundry-conformed toolpath generation.
Computer Aided Design 39 941-952.
D.A. Stephenson and J.S. Agapiou (1997). Metal Cutting Theory and Practice.
Marcel Dekker.
F. Rashiddy Wong (2003). Effect of drill geometry of uncoated tool when drilling
titanium alloy, TI-6Al-4V. IJnlersiti Teknologi Malaysia: Tesis liazah Sarjana.
G.Boothroyd and w. A. Ituight (1906). on the Art of Cutting Metals. Trans.
ASME. VoI.28,31.
Herbert Schulz (2001). Scientffic Fundamentals of High Speed Cutting. Hanser
Gardner.
His-Yung Feng, Huiwen Li (2002). Constant scallop-height tool path generationfor
three-axis sculptured surfaces machining. Computer Aided Design 34 647-654.
50
Ibrahim Zeid (2005). Mastering CAD/CAM. Mc Graw Hill Companies, lnc.' l22l
Avenue of the Americas, New York.
Jian-zongYang, Qi-Fu wang, zheng-Dong Huang, Li-Ping chen(2007). Tool path
generationfor machining compound surfaces with extended cut region method.
International Joumal Advance Manufactrning Technology 35: T79-185.
K. Tang, S.Y. Chou, L.L. Chen (199S). An algorithmfor reducing tool retractions in
zigzag pocket milling. Computer Aided Design 30 (2) T23-129.
Kai Tang, Charles C Cheng and Yakove Dayan (1995)' Offietting surface
boundaries and 3-axis gauge-free surface machining. Computer Aided Design
vol.27. No. 12, pp.915-927.
M.C Shaw (2005). Metal Cutting Principle. Second Edition. Oxford-
P.V. Prabu, A.K Gramopadhye, H.P. Wang (1990). A general mathematical model
.for optimizing NC tool pothforface milling ofJlat convex polygonal surfaces.
Int. J. Prod. Res.28 (1) 30-101.
R. Baptista, J.F. Antune Simoes (2000). Three andfive axes milling of sculptured
surfaces. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 103 398-403.
S.E. Sarma (1999). The uossingfunction and its application to zigzag tool paths.
Computer Aided Design 31 (9) 881-890.
S. Dolinsek, J. Kopac (2006). Mechanism and type of tool wear; particularities in
advanced cutting materials. Journal of Achievements in Materials and
Manufacturing Engineering vol 19.
Tao Chen, Zlttliang Shi (2008). A tool path generation strateg,t for three-axis-ball-
end milling offree-form surfaces. Journal of Materials Processing Technology
208 259-263.
51
Toh, C.K. Q004). A Study of the effict of cutter path strategies and orientations in
milling. Joumal of Materials Processing Technology |52,346-356.
Y.S. Suh, K.W. Lee (1990). NC Milling tool path generationfor arbitrary pockets
defined by sculptured surfaces. Computer Aided Design 22 (5)273-284.