top transactions lawyers dealmakers of the year a fistful ... · top transactions lawyers...

2
americanlawyer.com APRIL 2013 TOP TRANSACTIONS LAWYERS DEALMAKERS OF THE YEAR Photographs by Paul Godwin By Claire Zillman When Latin American banking powerhouse Santander Mexico decided to go public in a dual listing, the resulting IPO made headlines on both sides of the Rio Grande. A FISTFUL OF PESOS NE PUBLIC LISTING IS WORK. A dual listing is even harder. Add to that the Securities and Exchange Com- mission’s heightened postrecession concerns about banks, its unfamiliarity with the financial markets in Mexico, an uncertain political climate, and a finicky global market, and you have the challenges Grupo Financiero Santander Mexico SAB de CV faced in its dual offering in the United States and Mexi- co in October 2012, the largest Latin American IPO since 2009. SanMex’s primary tool in clearing those hurdles and putting the SEC’s worries to rest was a prospectus compiled by its lead outside counsel, Nicholas Kronfeld of Davis Polk & Wardwell. “Large fi- nancial institutions are always subject to scrutiny, and even more so in early 2012,” says Kronfeld, who works in New York. The docu- ment detailed how the bank operated and the risks that accompa- nied the purchase of its shares by investors. Writing such a docu- ment required that Kronfeld understand the nitty-gritty details of SanMex’s operations. “It really came down to traveling to Mexico, meeting with the client, and asking a lot of questions,” says Kro- nfeld, who visited Mexico four times during the yearlong lead-up to the IPO. “Then you revise the descriptions, go through financial statements, and understand the company’s risk.” Gaining the SEC’s stamp of approval is always an arduous pro- cess, and for SanMex, its status as the first-ever Mexican bank to go public made things even more complicated. Kronfeld was working off a blank slate, and so was the SEC. “If I’d been doing this for a U.S. bank, for example, I’d look at what other banks had filed with the SEC to see what issues they’d addressed,” Kronfeld says, and the SEC would likely complete a similar review process. But in this case, SanMex was a matter of first impression. “That just meant that the SEC had more questions about our documents. It’s not like they’d done 10 of these or even one of these before. There was no knowl- edge to fall back on,” Kronfeld says. The SEC disclosures that Kronfeld had done for 20 different banks prior to SanMex eased what could have been a tense back-and-forth, says SanMex general counsel Eduardo Fernandez Garcia Travesi. Kronfeld’s 20-year relationship with SanMex’s parent, Banco Santander, a Spanish bank that retains a 75 percent interest in San- Mex, and his proven success on IPOs also made him a no-brainer choice for Travesi. Kronfeld advised Santander on the $7.5 billion IPO of its Brazilian unit in 2009 and the potential $100 million IPO of its Argentine unit, which the bank eventually withdrew last year. “Nick has that special attribute in that he has a good attitude no matter the circumstances,” Travesi says. “And his previous experience with our parent company in other jurisdictions made him the best choice for us.” Kronfeld’s work on the SanMex IPO began in the fall of 2011. The company submitted its initial pro- spectus to the SEC in the early summer of 2012 and SanMex spent most of September in a road show for investors. The SEC signed off on the offering and the IPO priced on September 25, 2012. It began trading the next day. When Travesi considers the success of the offer- ing, his assessment goes beyond the $4.1 billion in new capital it brought to the bank. “Because this was the largest-ever offering by a Mexican issuer, it did a lot to boost Mexico’s reputation in the global mar- ket,” he says. As an IPO veteran, Kronfeld is well aware that every offering comes with its own set of pressures. “If it’s a small company and you’re working with the founders, the offering is a very personal pro- cess,” Kronfeld says. “[But] in this instance, there was a national interest at stake.” Email: [email protected]. DEAL IN BRIEF SANTANDER MEXICO IPO DEAL VALUE $4.1 billion FIRM’S ROLE Issuer’s Counsel

Upload: ngohuong

Post on 15-Jun-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: TOP TRANSACTIONS LAWYERS DEALMAKERS OF THE YEAR A FISTFUL ... · TOP TRANSACTIONS LAWYERS DEALMAKERS OF THE YEAR ... A FISTFUL OF PESOS ... SEC’s worries to rest was a prospectus

americanlawyer.com APRIL 2013

TOP TRANSACTIONS LAWYERS

DEALMAKERS OF THE YEAR

Ph

otog

rap

hs

by

Pau

l G

odw

in

By Claire Zillman

When Latin American banking powerhouse Santander Mexico decided to go public in a dual listing, the resulting IPO made headlines on both sides of the Rio Grande.

A FISTFUL OF PESOS

NE PUBLIC LISTING IS WORK. A dual listing is even harder. Add to that the Securities and Exchange Com-mission’s heightened postrecession concerns about banks, its unfamiliarity with the financial markets in

Mexico, an uncertain political climate, and a finicky global market, and you have the challenges Grupo Financiero Santander Mexico SAB de CV faced in its dual offering in the United States and Mexi-co in October 2012, the largest Latin American IPO since 2009.

SanMex’s primary tool in clearing those hurdles and putting the SEC’s worries to rest was a prospectus compiled by its lead outside counsel, Nicholas Kronfeld of Davis Polk & Wardwell. “Large fi-nancial institutions are always subject to scrutiny, and even more so in early 2012,” says Kronfeld, who works in New York. The docu-ment detailed how the bank operated and the risks that accompa-nied the purchase of its shares by investors. Writing such a docu-ment required that Kronfeld understand the nitty-gritty details of SanMex’s operations. “It really came down to traveling to Mexico, meeting with the client, and asking a lot of questions,” says Kro-nfeld, who visited Mexico four times during the yearlong lead-up to the IPO. “Then you revise the descriptions, go through financial statements, and understand the company’s risk.”

Gaining the SEC’s stamp of approval is always an arduous pro-cess, and for SanMex, its status as the first-ever Mexican bank to go public made things even more complicated. Kronfeld was working off a blank slate, and so was the SEC. “If I’d been doing this for a U.S. bank, for example, I’d look at what other banks had filed with the SEC to see what issues they’d addressed,” Kronfeld says, and the SEC would likely complete a similar review process. But in this case, SanMex was a matter of first impression. “That just meant that the SEC had more questions about our documents. It’s not like they’d done 10 of these or even one of these before. There was no knowl-edge to fall back on,” Kronfeld says.

The SEC disclosures that Kronfeld had done for 20 different banks prior to SanMex eased what could have been a tense back-and-forth, says SanMex general counsel Eduardo Fernandez Garcia Travesi.

Kronfeld’s 20-year relationship with SanMex’s parent, Banco Santander, a Spanish bank that retains a 75 percent interest in San-Mex, and his proven success on IPOs also made him a no-brainer choice for Travesi. Kronfeld advised Santander on the $7.5 billion

IPO of its Brazilian unit in 2009 and the potential $100 million IPO of its Argentine unit, which the bank eventually withdrew last year. “Nick has that special attribute in that he has a good attitude no matter the circumstances,” Travesi says. “And his previous experience with our parent company in other jurisdictions made him the best choice for us.”

Kronfeld’s work on the SanMex IPO began in the fall of 2011. The company submitted its initial pro-spectus to the SEC in the early summer of 2012 and SanMex spent most of September in a road show for investors. The SEC signed off on the offering and the IPO priced on September 25, 2012. It began trading the next day.

When Travesi considers the success of the offer-ing, his assessment goes beyond the $4.1 billion in new capital it brought to the bank. “Because this was the largest-ever offering by a Mexican issuer, it did a lot to boost Mexico’s reputation in the global mar-ket,” he says.

As an IPO veteran, Kronfeld is well aware that every offering comes with its own set of pressures. “If it’s a small company and you’re working with the founders, the offering is a very personal pro-cess,” Kronfeld says. “[But] in this instance, there was a national interest at stake.”

Email: [email protected].

DEAL IN BRIEF

SANTANDER MEXICO IPO

DEAL VALUE $4.1 billion

FIRM’S ROLE Issuer’s Counsel

Page 2: TOP TRANSACTIONS LAWYERS DEALMAKERS OF THE YEAR A FISTFUL ... · TOP TRANSACTIONS LAWYERS DEALMAKERS OF THE YEAR ... A FISTFUL OF PESOS ... SEC’s worries to rest was a prospectus

DEALMAKERS OF THE YEARP

RO

P S

TYLI

NG

BY

JEF

F ST

YLE

S

Reprinted with permission from the April 2013 edition of THE AMERICAN LAWYER © 2013 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All rights reserved. Further duplication without permission is prohibited. For information, contact 877-257-3382 or [email protected]. # 001-04-13-03

NICHOLAS KRONFELD, Davis Polk

Kronfeld and his team drafted 176 iterations of the prospectus.DEAL TRIVIA