tracking motivation engeser steiner kehr emac 2010 with authorization to intotheminds.com
TRANSCRIPT
Tracking Motivation ofTracking Motivation of Lead Users and Non-Lead Users
in Workshops onin Workshops on Sustainability Innovations?
Stefan Engeser, Susanne Steiner & Hugo M. Kehr
Technische Universität München
European Marketing Academy Conference 2010 - Track 4: Innovation and New Product Development -
Innovation and New Product Development - Engeser, Steiner & Kehr 1
p
Sustainable InnovationsSustainable Innovations
We are part of a joint research project:
Fostering sustainable consumption by integrating users into sustainability innovations y
www.nanu-projekt.de
Innovation and New Product Development - Engeser, Steiner & Kehr 2
Sustainable InnovationsSustainable Innovations
passive houses
User integrationin sustainability innovations
bioplastics
t bilitinnovations smart mobility
cross-cutting issues:motivation
Innovation and New Product Development - Engeser, Steiner & Kehr 3
User IntegrationUser Integrationn
InnovationworkshopsToolkits
high
tegr
atio
n
Idea Competitions
p
Communities
h
vel o
f Int
Focus groups DialogueService phone
Weblog
Lev
low
l
pOnline FeedbackInquiries
highLevel of Interactionlow
Innovation and New Product Development - Engeser, Steiner & Kehr 4
MotivationMotivation
In user integration motivational issues become apparent:In user integration motivational issues become apparent:
(1) Why do people participate in user integration without (adequate) payment?(adequate) payment?
(2) Are users still motivated during innovation processes?
Innovation and New Product Development - Engeser, Steiner & Kehr 5
Lead usernessLead-userness
Lead users are found a highly innovative source of newLead users are found a highly innovative source of new product development (e.g., Hippel, 1986; Lüthje et al., 2005; Morrison, et al., 2004, Schreier & Prügl, 2008)
Lead Users:Lead Users:
(1) Are ahead of the market trend
(2) Have high level of expertise
(3) Expect benefits of innovation
Innovation and New Product Development - Engeser, Steiner & Kehr 6
Research AimsResearch Aims
(1) Identify incentives to participate in user integration(1) Identify incentives to participate in user integration workshops on sustainability innovations
(2) Tracking motivation during innovation workshops(2) Tracking motivation during innovation workshops
(3) Testing the hypotheses that lead users see more incentives and showing higher motivation during theincentives and showing higher motivation during the workshop
Innovation and New Product Development - Engeser, Steiner & Kehr 7
Method ParticipantsMethod – Participants- Twelve workshops with a total of - 165 participants in - three marketplaces (passive houses, bioplastics, smart
mobilit )mobility).- Six workshops consisted of lead users only, and six of
non-lead users onlynon lead users only.- M = 40.1 years (SD = 16.7).- 44 % of the participants were women.p p
Lead user selected according to:- Dissatisfaction with existing products- Dissatisfaction with existing products- Expected benefits of innovations- Knowledge
Innovation and New Product Development - Engeser, Steiner & Kehr 8
Knowledge
Method ProcedureMethod – ProcedureOpen Innovation Incentive
Questionnaire (OIIQ)Friday 5 pm Questionnaire (OIIQ)Phase 1: Introduction
Friday 5 pm
Phase 2: Generation of ideasMotivational indicators:
Flow, Mood, 3 components of motivation
Phase 3: Selection of ideas
motivation
Phase 4: Elaboration of ideasMotivational indicators:
Flow, Mood, 3 components of Phase 4: Elaboration of ideasSaturday 5 pm motivation
(Commitment, Quality of ideas…)
Innovation and New Product Development - Engeser, Steiner & Kehr 9
( , y )
Method – Open Innovation Incentive QuestionnaireQuestionnaire
Incentives Items: I am taking part … g pAltruism … to help the company to develop new services and
productsId tifi ti id tif lf ith thIdentification … identify myself with the companyDiscontent … angry about the current offers.Tangible Rewards getting compensationTangible Rewards … getting compensation.Career … it looks good for my CV
Incentives are based on extensive literature research; e.g.,: Simon et al. (1998), Wu et al. (2007), Hertel et al. (2003).
Innovation and New Product Development - Engeser, Steiner & Kehr 10
Method – Open Innovation Incentive Questionnaire
Incentives Items: I am taking part …
Questionnaireg p
Altruism … to help the company to develop new services and products
Id tifi ti id tif lf ith thIdentification … identify myself with the companyDiscontent … angry about the current offers.Tangible Rewards getting compensationTangible Rewards … getting compensation.Career … it looks good for my CVAchievement … want to extend my knowledgePower … want to impress othersAffiliation … like to be with other peopleAbility … because I am a creative person
Additional incentives are based on motivational psychology; cf. Heckhausen & Heckhausen 2008
Innovation and New Product Development - Engeser, Steiner & Kehr 11
Heckhausen & Heckhausen, 2008.
Method Flow ExperienceMethod – Flow ExperienceFlow Experience (Csikszentmihalyi, 1975):
- High concentration
- Activity guided by an inner logic
- Change in the experience of time
- Merging of the self and the activity / loss of self-consciousness
Flow-Short-Scale (10 Items; e g Engeser & Rheinberg 2008)Flow-Short-Scale (10 Items; e.g., Engeser & Rheinberg, 2008)“I am totally absorbed in what I am doing”“I feel that I have everything under control”y g“I am completely lost in thought”
Innovation and New Product Development - Engeser, Steiner & Kehr 12
Method MoodMethod – MoodMood Adjective Checklist (UWIST; Matthews et al 1990) -Mood Adjective Checklist (UWIST; Matthews et al., 1990) -Energetization : How do you feel in the moment …activedynamicshiftless (recoded)i ti ( d d)inactive (recoded)…
Innovation and New Product Development - Engeser, Steiner & Kehr 13
Method 3 Components of MotivationMethod – 3 Components of Motivation3 Components of Motivation (Kehr 2004):3 Components of Motivation (Kehr, 2004):affective preferences “I find participating in the workshop fun”
cognitive preferences “It is important for me to come up with good results”
perceived abilities “I have the abilities needed to solve theperceived abilities I have the abilities needed to solve the problems in the workshop”
Innovation and New Product Development - Engeser, Steiner & Kehr 14
Results IncentivesResults – Incentives
Identification
Achievement
Altruism
Affiliation
Tangible Rewards
Ability
Power
Discontent
g
1 2 3 4 5 6
Power
Innovation and New Product Development - Engeser, Steiner & Kehr 15
Results Incentives & Lead UsernessResults – Incentives & Lead-UsernessLead User Non-Lead
UserM
UserM
Achievement 5.39 4.75
Identification 5.27 4.65
Affiliation 5.15 4.47
Alt i 5 23 4 39Altruism 5.23 4.39
Ability 4.82 3.62
Tangible Rewards 3.6 3.34Tangible Rewards 3.6 3.34
Discontent 3.81 2.69
Power 3.57 2.67
Career 3.22 2.37
Innovation and New Product Development - Engeser, Steiner & Kehr 16
Results Incentives & Lead UsernessResults – Incentives & Lead-UsernessLead User Non-Lead
UserM
UserM r d
Achievement 5.39 4.75 .39** 0.85
Identification 5.27 4.65 .29** 0.59
Affiliation 5.15 4.47 .29** 0.59
Alt i 5 23 4 39 37** 0 78Altruism 5.23 4.39 .37** 0.78
Ability 4.82 3.62 .50** 1.15
Tangible Rewards 3.6 3.34 .13+ 0.26Tangible Rewards 3.6 3.34 .13 0.26
Discontent 3.81 2.69 .36** 0.77
Power 3.57 2.67 .38** 0.82
Career 3.22 2.37 .26** 0.53
+ p < .10, * p < .05, ** p < .01
Innovation and New Product Development - Engeser, Steiner & Kehr 17
Results Incentives & Lead UsernessResults – Incentives & Lead-Userness Achieve-
mentIdenti-fication
Affili-ation
Altruism Ability Dis-content
Power Careerment fication ation contentβ β β β β β β β
Lead-Userness a .39**Age -.10Gender .05P i h b 03Passive house b .03Mobility c .07Lead-Userness x -.10ead Use essPassive house Lead-Userness xMobility
.03Mobility
a = lead user vs non-lead user * p < .05, ** p < .01
Innovation and New Product Development - Engeser, Steiner & Kehr 18
= lead user vs. non-lead userb = dummy variable: passive houses vs. others c = dummy variable: with mobility vs. others
p , p
Results Incentives & Lead UsernessResults – Incentives & Lead-Userness Achieve-
mentIdenti-fication
Affili-ation
Altruism Ability Dis-content
Power Careerment fication ation contentβ β β β β β β β
Lead-Userness a .39** .29** .29** .37** .49** .37** .38** .28**Age -.10 .09 -.11 -.08 -.16 -.05 -.40** -.45**Gender .05 .04 .09 .05 .00 .06 .02 .04P i h b 03 03 16 18 04 20* 05 06Passive house b .03 -.03 .16 -.18 .04 -.20* -.05 .06Mobility c .07 .09 .05 .38** .24* .06 .35** -.11Lead-Userness x -.10 -.03 -.08 .06 -.07 .01 .05 .05ead Use essPassive house Lead-Userness xMobility
.03 -.09 .17* .03 -.09 -.07 .13 -.09Mobility
a = lead user vs non-lead user * p < .05, ** p < .01
Innovation and New Product Development - Engeser, Steiner & Kehr 19
= lead user vs. non-lead userb = dummy variable: passive houses vs. others c = dummy variable: with mobility vs. others
p , p
Results Incentives & Lead UsernessResults – Incentives & Lead-Userness Affiliation
6
5
4
3Lead User Non-Lead User
Mobility Others
Innovation and New Product Development - Engeser, Steiner & Kehr 20
Results Incentives & Lead UsernessResults – Incentives & Lead-Userness
(1) Identification with the company/product and wanting to(1) Identification with the company/product and wanting to help finding new innovations (altruism) are strong incentives.
(2) Additionally, learning something new / accomplish something difficult (achievement) and being with others is important too.
(3) Lead users see higher incentives to participate in the workshops.
(4) We found small differences between the k t lmarketplaces.
Innovation and New Product Development - Engeser, Steiner & Kehr 21
Results Motivational IndicatorsResults – Motivational IndicatorsEnergetiz- Energetiz- Flow 1 Flow 2g
ation 1g
ation 2Lead-Userness a .04 .25* .12 .25*
A hi t 11 07 10 15Achievement .11 .07 .10 .15
Identification .18* .26* .18* .26*
Affiliation .10 -.05 .18* .06AffiliationAltruism .22* .23* .29* .35*
Ability .13 .00 .18* .12
Tangible Rewards -.12 -.24* .02 -.06
Discontent .08 .16 .13 .12
P 05 07 09 08Power .05 -.07 .09 .08
Career -.06 -.27* -.03 -.12
* p < 05a = lead user vs non lead user
Innovation and New Product Development - Engeser, Steiner & Kehr 22
p < .05a = lead-user vs. non-lead user
Results Motivational IndicatorsResults – Motivational IndicatorsEnergetization 2
βLead-Userness a .20*Age .30**Gender -.07Energetization 1 29**Energetization 1 .29Passive house b -.10Mobility c -.08Mobility Lead-Userness x Passive house -.01
Lead-Userness x Mobility -.06
a = lead user vs. non-lead userb = dummy variable: passive houses vs. others
* p < .05, ** p < .01
Innovation and New Product Development - Engeser, Steiner & Kehr 23
c = dummy variable: with mobility vs. others
Results Motivational IndicatorsResults – Motivational IndicatorsFlow 2β
Lead-Userness a .23**08Age .08
Gender .04Flow 1 29**Flow 1 .29Passive house b -.11Mobility c -.01Mobility Lead-Userness x Passive house .05
Lead-Userness x Mobility .05
a = lead user vs. non-lead userb = dummy variable: passive houses vs. others
* p < .05, ** p < .01
Innovation and New Product Development - Engeser, Steiner & Kehr 24
c = dummy variable: with mobility vs. others
Results Motivational IndicatorsResults – Motivational Indicators
(1) Lead users are more energetic at the end of the(1) Lead users are more energetic at the end of the workshop
(2) Lead users are more focused on the task (flow(2) Lead users are more focused on the task (flow experience)
(3) We found no differences between the marketplaces(3) We found no differences between the marketplaces
Innovation and New Product Development - Engeser, Steiner & Kehr 25
ConclusionsConclusions
Considering motivation:Considering motivation:
Integration of lead users into sustainable product development could be recommendeddevelopment could be recommended
Limitation:
High motivation is a necessary condition for achievement, but not a sufficient condition
Innovation and New Product Development - Engeser, Steiner & Kehr 26
Thank you
Innovation and New Product Development - Engeser, Steiner & Kehr 27
LiteraturLiteraturEngeser, S. & Rheinberg, F. (2008). Flow, moderators of challenge-skill balance and performance. Motivation and Emotion, 32, 158-172.Heckhausen, J. & Heckhausen, H. (2008). Motivation and action. Cambridge: University Press.Hertel, G., Niedner, S. & Herrmann, S. (2003). Motivation of software developers in open source projects: an internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. Research Policy, 32, 1159-1177.Kehr H M (2004) Integrating implicit motives explicit motives and perceived abilities: The compensatoryKehr, H. M. (2004). Integrating implicit motives, explicit motives, and perceived abilities: The compensatory model of work motivation und volition. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 479-499.Lüthje, C. Herstatt, C., and von Hippel, E. (2005). User-Innovators and “Local” Information: The case of mountain biking. Research Policy, 34, 951-965.Matthews, G., Jones, D. M. & Chamberlain, A. G. (1990). Refining the measurement of mood: The UWIST Mood Adjective Checklist. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 17-42.
Morrison, P. D., Roberts, J. H., & Midgley, D. F. (2004). The nature of lead users and measurement of leading edge status. Research Policy, 33(2), 351–362.g g y ( )Schreier, M. & Prügl. R. (2008). Extending lead-user theory: antecedents and consequences of consumers’ lead userness. Product Innovation Management, 25, 331-346.Simon, B., Loewy, M., Stürmer, S., Weber, U., Freytag, P., Habig, C., Kampmeier, C. & Spahlinger, P. (1998). Collective identification and social movement participation Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74Collective identification and social movement participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74,646–658.Von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: a source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32, 791-806.Wu, C.-G., Gerlach, J. H., Young, C. E. (2007. An empirical analysis of open source software developers’
Innovation and New Product Development - Engeser, Steiner & Kehr 28
motivations and continuance intentions. Information & Management, 44, 253-262.