trapped nitrogen in individual chondrules: nature of ...library/murty_svs_114_09_abst.pdf · in...

1
Trapped nitrogen in individual chondrules: Nature of chondrule precursors and clues to formation mechanisms J. P. Das 1,2 and S. V. S. Murty 1 Received 3 July 2008; revised 25 September 2008; accepted 11 November 2008; published 30 January 2009. [1] Nitrogen amount and isotopic composition have been measured in individual chondrules of six ordinary chondrites (OC) and two each of carbonaceous (CC) and enstatite chondrites (EC). The [N (ppm), d 15 N t (%) {corrected for cosmogenic contribution}] for the chondrules have ranges of [0.8 to 61, 97 to +164], [19 to 140, 21 to –31], and [2 to 77, 27 to +116] among OC, EC, and CC, respectively. For OC, while N contents of chondrules fall in the range of bulk OC, d 15 N spans a wide range, in contrast to the narrow range (25 to +14%) for bulk. For CC chondrules, N contents are lower, while d 15 N is different and heavier than bulk. In contrast, EC chondrules and bulk have comparable N and d 15 N values. Neither N nor d 15 N t of OC and CC chondrules show any size (expected for nebular exchange) or chemical/mineralogical dependence, ruling out the dominance of secondary effects of nebular or parent body origin. The range of d 15 N t among OC and CC chondrules represents d 15 N t heterogeneity of chondrule precursors and their survival after a high-temperature chondrule-forming event. On the basis of d 15 N of the chondrules, we propose the presence of at least three N components carried by phase Q, presolar diamonds (HL), and insoluble organic matter (IOM). The precursors of chondrules from OC and CC are different than the bulk OC and CC, which represents the different environment for their formation, compared to the bulk OC and CC. However, for EC chondrules, precursors as well as the formation environment are the same as those of enstatite chondrites. Citation: Das, J. P., and S. V. S. Murty (2009), Trapped nitrogen in individual chondrules: Nature of chondrule precursors and clues to formation mechanisms, J. Geophys. Res., 114, E01008, doi:10.1029/2008JE003232. 1. Introduction [2] Chondrules are one of the earliest formed silicate spheres of about 1 mm average size and occur at an abundance of up to 80% by volume in chondrites [e.g., Brearley and Jones, 1998; Rubin, 2000; Hewins et al., 2005; Lauretta et al., 2006]. Such high abundances of chondrules imply that their formation was an important and common process during early stages of the solar system [Hewins, 1997]. Petrological features suggest that chondrules are formed by flash heating and rapid cooling of the preexisting silicate precursors [e.g., Rubin, 2000]. However, the nature of chondrule precursors and environment(s) during chondrule formation for different types of chondrites remain to be fully understood. Proposed mechanisms suggest either nebular environment or planetary surface as possible locations of chondrule formation [Ciesla, 2005]. X-wind model [Shu et al., 2001] and nebular shock wave model [Connolly and Love, 1998] are the most favored nebular models for chondrule formation, whereas many different types of magmatic processes like volcanism and collisional events between planetesimals (with solid, partially molten or fully molten interiors) have also been proposed for chondrule formation [Sanders and Taylor, 2005; Ciesla, 2005]. [3] In case of nebular origin of chondrules, interaction between nebular gases and chondrules is expected during chondrule formation. Oxygen isotopic composition of chon- drules has provided vital clues regarding nebular interaction with chondrules. In a three-isotopic diagram (d 18 O versus d 17 O), bulk O isotopic compositions of most chondrules in ordinary, enstatite, and carbonaceous chondrites plot above, along, and below the terrestrial fractionation line (with slope 0.5 and result of mass-dependent fractionation between oxygen isotopes), respectively. This can be explained by the exchange between two components of oxygen with different abundances of 16 O[Clayton et al., 1991; Clayton, 1993; Krot et al., 2006; Chaussidon et al., 2008]. Studies of Type I chondrules suggest the important role of gas-melt interaction during their formation and reveal the presence of different unequilibrated components [Libourel et al., 2006; Libourel and Krot, 2007; Chaussidon et al., 2008]. Under nebular conditions, nitrogen is most stable in the molecular form [Lewis and Prinn, 1980]. This inert form of molecular nitrogen can be trapped in chondrule precursors along with noble gases, and as would be expected, usually shows a correlation with trapped 36 Ar. In addition, nitrogen may also be chemically bound, mostly as organic matter in chondrule JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 114, E01008, doi:10.1029/2008JE003232, 2009 Click Here for Full Articl e 1 Planetary and Geosciences Division, Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad, India. 2 Now at Institute of Earth Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan. Copyright 2009 by the American Geophysical Union. 0148-0227/09/2008JE003232$09.00 E01008 1 of 16

Upload: others

Post on 12-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Trapped nitrogen in individual chondrules: Nature of ...library/Murty_SVS_114_09_abst.pdf · In contrast, EC chondrules and bulk have comparable N and d15N values. Neither N nor d15N

Trapped nitrogen in individual chondrules: Nature of chondrule

precursors and clues to formation mechanisms

J. P. Das1,2 and S. V. S. Murty1

Received 3 July 2008; revised 25 September 2008; accepted 11 November 2008; published 30 January 2009.

[1] Nitrogen amount and isotopic composition have been measured in individualchondrules of six ordinary chondrites (OC) and two each of carbonaceous (CC) andenstatite chondrites (EC). The [N (ppm), d15Nt (%) {corrected for cosmogeniccontribution}] for the chondrules have ranges of [0.8 to 61, �97 to +164], [19 to 140,�21 to –31], and [2 to 77, �27 to +116] among OC, EC, and CC, respectively. For OC,while N contents of chondrules fall in the range of bulk OC, d15N spans a wide range,in contrast to the narrow range (�25 to +14%) for bulk. For CC chondrules, N contentsare lower, while d15N is different and heavier than bulk. In contrast, EC chondrulesand bulk have comparable N and d15N values. Neither N nor d15Nt of OC and CCchondrules show any size (expected for nebular exchange) or chemical/mineralogicaldependence, ruling out the dominance of secondary effects of nebular or parent bodyorigin. The range of d15Nt among OC and CC chondrules represents d15Nt heterogeneityof chondrule precursors and their survival after a high-temperature chondrule-formingevent. On the basis of d15N of the chondrules, we propose the presence of at least threeN components carried by phase Q, presolar diamonds (HL), and insoluble organic matter(IOM). The precursors of chondrules from OC and CC are different than the bulk OCand CC, which represents the different environment for their formation, compared to thebulk OC and CC. However, for EC chondrules, precursors as well as the formationenvironment are the same as those of enstatite chondrites.

Citation: Das, J. P., and S. V. S. Murty (2009), Trapped nitrogen in individual chondrules: Nature of chondrule precursors and clues

to formation mechanisms, J. Geophys. Res., 114, E01008, doi:10.1029/2008JE003232.

1. Introduction

[2] Chondrules are one of the earliest formed silicatespheres of about �1 mm average size and occur at anabundance of up to 80% by volume in chondrites [e.g.,Brearley and Jones, 1998; Rubin, 2000; Hewins et al., 2005;Lauretta et al., 2006]. Such high abundances of chondrulesimply that their formation was an important and commonprocess during early stages of the solar system [Hewins,1997]. Petrological features suggest that chondrules areformed by flash heating and rapid cooling of the preexistingsilicate precursors [e.g.,Rubin, 2000]. However, the nature ofchondrule precursors and environment(s) during chondruleformation for different types of chondrites remain to be fullyunderstood. Proposed mechanisms suggest either nebularenvironment or planetary surface as possible locations ofchondrule formation [Ciesla, 2005]. X-wind model [Shu etal., 2001] and nebular shock wave model [Connolly andLove, 1998] are the most favored nebular models forchondrule formation, whereas many different types ofmagmatic processes like volcanism and collisional events

between planetesimals (with solid, partially molten or fullymolten interiors) have also been proposed for chondruleformation [Sanders and Taylor, 2005; Ciesla, 2005].[3] In case of nebular origin of chondrules, interaction

between nebular gases and chondrules is expected duringchondrule formation. Oxygen isotopic composition of chon-drules has provided vital clues regarding nebular interactionwith chondrules. In a three-isotopic diagram (d18O versusd17O), bulk O isotopic compositions of most chondrules inordinary, enstatite, and carbonaceous chondrites plot above,along, and below the terrestrial fractionation line (with slope0.5 and result of mass-dependent fractionation betweenoxygen isotopes), respectively. This can be explained bythe exchange between two components of oxygen withdifferent abundances of 16O [Clayton et al., 1991; Clayton,1993; Krot et al., 2006; Chaussidon et al., 2008]. Studies ofType I chondrules suggest the important role of gas-meltinteraction during their formation and reveal the presence ofdifferent unequilibrated components [Libourel et al., 2006;Libourel and Krot, 2007; Chaussidon et al., 2008]. Undernebular conditions, nitrogen is most stable in the molecularform [Lewis and Prinn, 1980]. This inert form of molecularnitrogen can be trapped in chondrule precursors along withnoble gases, and as would be expected, usually shows acorrelation with trapped 36Ar. In addition, nitrogen may alsobe chemically bound, mostly as organic matter in chondrule

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 114, E01008, doi:10.1029/2008JE003232, 2009ClickHere

for

FullArticle

1Planetary and Geosciences Division, Physical Research Laboratory,Ahmedabad, India.

2Now at Institute of Earth Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.

Copyright 2009 by the American Geophysical Union.0148-0227/09/2008JE003232$09.00

E01008 1 of 16