tso remit implementation - home - entsog · > tso remit implementation task force group was...

15
TSO REMIT implementation Kathrine Nygaard Stannov Maria Gerova Subject Manager Transparency Transparency Adviser Process and status Brussels – 8 December 2016

Upload: vanliem

Post on 17-Dec-2018

233 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

TSO REMIT implementation

Kathrine Nygaard Stannov Maria Gerova

Subject Manager Transparency Transparency Adviser

Process and status

Brussels – 8 December 2016

2

Registration status

3

Registration process

TSOs status

Market participant registration

Completed by all TSOs

RRM registration

38 TSOs selected the option to become RRMs

26 TSOs registered as RRMs on 7 April 2016

32 TSOs registered as RRMs in December 2016

4 TSOs in process of RRM registration in December 2016

TSOs that will use third parties RRMs for their REMIT reporting

11 TSOs are using the services of third party RRMs forthe REMIT reporting of their transactional andfundamental data

Registration status

4

Main issues

5

RRM registration process

> Issues with interpretation of ACER RRM requirements

> Power of Attorney issues

> Attestation documentation development

> Technical problems

Certificate issues

Interface implementation issues

Encryption/decryption issues

Issues related to access to ARIS TST and PRD systems

Testing issues

Main REMIT implementation problems

6

Testing and reporting process

> XSD schema related issues

Meaning of the schema field issues

Mandatory fields for which data could not be provided

Network users (MP) identification issues

Unmatched and matched orders reporting

Currency issue

Backloading issue

Main REMIT implementation problems

7

Delays in the reporting

Some TSOs activated ACER Contingency plan scenarios for delay of their data reporting

> For the full scope of their REMIT reporting

> Partially - only for certain data types

Contingency plan activation

8

What we have done?

9

REMIT related activities

> ENTSOG – TSOs – ACER REMIT Implementation discussion forum

> Participation to ACER REMIT forums (WG, roundtables, webinars)

REMIT Expert group

Roundtable for Inside Information Disclosure

RRM workshop, physical meetings and webinars

> Proposal for REMIT reporting schema changes in January 2016

> Proposal for REMIT reporting schema changes in November 2016

> Proposal for UMMs data collection schema changes in April 2016

> Participation to the ACER EREMP tool Public consultation with particular proposals

> Support to ACER Team in the development of position on REMIT and UMM relatedstakeholder questions

ENTSOG activities

10

ENTSOG TRA Team

TRA WG

TSO REMIT Implementation

TF

ACER

ENTSOG-TSOs-ACER discussion forum

REMIT implementation

questions

11

Process description

> TSO REMIT Implementation Task Force group was formed within ENTSOG TRA WG

> Discussion sessions were initiated between ACER, ENTSOG TRA Area team and TSOREMIT Implementation TF in November 2015

> Technical sessions with participation of ACER CSD and service provider wereestablished in January 2016

> 10 discussion sessions with ACER team were performed, 9 of them before 7 April2016

Outcome

> Internal document with the answers of all questions discussed with ACER (currently49 questions). Limited set of these questions have been published by the Agency

> Internal document merging the most frequently asked technical questions submittedto ENSTOG (currently 81 questions)

> Internal document with proposals for workaround solution on some of the schemaissues

Process description

12

Challenges

> ACER operational team is not fully empowered to provide Agency’s position. As aresult, the final ACER position on some issues strongly deviates compared to whatwas agreed during the discussion sessions

> Delay or absence of publication of the questions and answers discussed. Not clearview on the final and official ACER position

> Lack of response from ACER Team on ENTSOG Team queries and proposals

> ENTSOG Team was forced to complete a lot of tasks within the scope of ACERresponsibilities

> Failed attempt at Q1 2016 for REMIT schema changes, although all the needed data,including Edig@s schema draft, were provided from our side

> Lost fight on the so called “currency issue”

Process description

13

Outcome

14

Outcomes

> 91 % of the TSOs ready and with ongoing REMIT reporting

> Deep involvement and strong support from TSOs’ side

> Good cooperation and understanding from ACER REMIT Team up to 7 April 2016

TSO REMIT implementation process

Thank You for Your Attention

ENTSOG -- European Network of Transmission System Operators for GasAvenue de Cortenbergh 100, B-1000 Brussels

EML:WWW: www.entsog.eu

Kathrine Stannov Subject Manager Transparency

Maria GerovaTransparency Adviser

[email protected] [email protected]