two-beam test stand status and results roger ruber & igor syratchev for the tbts team

8
Two-beam Test Stand Two-beam Test Stand Status and Results Status and Results Roger Ruber & Igor Syratchev for the TBTS team

Upload: linda-williamson

Post on 17-Jan-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Two-beam Test Stand Status and Results Roger Ruber & Igor Syratchev for the TBTS team

Two-beam Test StandTwo-beam Test StandStatus and ResultsStatus and Results

Roger Ruber & Igor Syratchev

for the

TBTS team

Page 2: Two-beam Test Stand Status and Results Roger Ruber & Igor Syratchev for the TBTS team

12 GHz PETS testing at CLEX

Operation mode #1 #2 #3 CLIC

Current, A <30 14 4 101

Pulse length, ns 140 <240

<1200

240

Bunch Frequency, GHz 12 12 3 12

PETS power (12 GHz), MW

<280

61 5 135

DBACRDL

TBTSCLEX

CTF3

CTF2

#1

#2

#3

• Different scenarios of the drive beam generation in the CTF3

• To compensate for the lack of current, the active TBTS PETS length was significantly increased: from the original 0.215 m to 1 m.

• In order to demonstrate the nominal CLIC power level and pulse length, it was decided to implement a different PETS configuration – PETS with external re-circulation.

Variable Splitter (coupling: 01)Variable

phase shifter

To the Load

PETS output

Drivebeam

PETS input

Round trip efficiency: 75%Round trip delay: 22 ns<30A

14 A

4 A

0 200 400 600 8000

50

100

150

Time, ns

Pow

er, M

W

Pn 0.9

Pn

Tc Tp

3.5 A

4.0 A

5.0 A

6.0 A

240 ns

CLICnominal

CLICnominal

Expected PETS power production with re-circulation.The calculation followed the measured performance of all

the components

2

Page 3: Two-beam Test Stand Status and Results Roger Ruber & Igor Syratchev for the TBTS team

PETS high power tests at CERN (TBTS)

0 50 100 150 200 250 3000

1

2

3

Time, ns

Pow

er, M

WThe first RF 12 GHz power generation from the PETS in re-circulation regime 15.11.008

No re-circulation

Power gain = 6

Input for calculations:I = 1.18 ACoupling = 0.82

~Measured:

Similar to SLAC, the conditioning of the system is accomplished with heavy out gassing.

PETS tank installed in CLEX15.10.08

BPM signals RF signals

3

Page 4: Two-beam Test Stand Status and Results Roger Ruber & Igor Syratchev for the TBTS team

Two-Beam Test Stand

Relevance for the Decelerator BD studies : the effect of the PETS on the Drive Beam

( Work in progress – results from last Friday )

NorduCLICNorduCLIC

Ppred

ImeasPmeas

xd,pred

xd,meas

4

Page 5: Two-beam Test Stand Status and Results Roger Ruber & Igor Syratchev for the TBTS team

11-Dec-2008

• 1.25 MW max. at 1.93 A, no significant beam loss• comparison RF power to beam current:

→ assume

RF Power Generation (150ns pulse)

i

ia)I(I

)IRF(

2i

2i

2ii

2IRF a

21 Nov.2008

no re-circulation

5

Page 6: Two-beam Test Stand Status and Results Roger Ruber & Igor Syratchev for the TBTS team

11-Dec-2008

Power Generation with Re-circulation

• max. 5.2 MW power at 1.8Afactor 4.4 compared to 1.25 MW at 1.9 A w/o circ.

• not sure about phase-shift & variable splitter

28 Nov.2008

with re-circulation

0.95 MW

0.32 offset

6

Page 7: Two-beam Test Stand Status and Results Roger Ruber & Igor Syratchev for the TBTS team

11-Dec-2008

Beam Kick Measurements

• 5 BPMs in each beam line• 2 before: incoming angle & offset• 2 after: kick angle

• dipole + BPM5 for energy measurement

BPM5: x5

BPM 1: x1

BPM2: x2

BPM 3: x3

BPM 4: x4

dipole

beam kick[θ,δ]

7

Page 8: Two-beam Test Stand Status and Results Roger Ruber & Igor Syratchev for the TBTS team

11-Dec-2008

Estimation of Beam Bending in PETS

bend:• g for bend in centre of PETS• incoming beam not on PETS axis• gradual change along pulse

21 Nov.2008

no re-circulation

xg

8