two models and two emission databases – evaluation of the ...€¦ · two models and two emission...

9
Two models and two emission databases – evaluation of the PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations modelled with WRF-Chem and EMEP4PL Małgorzata Werner, Maciej Kryza, Justyna Dudek Department of Climatology and Atmosphere Protection University of Wroclaw

Upload: others

Post on 26-Aug-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Two models and two emission databases – evaluation of the ...€¦ · Two models and two emission databases –evaluation of the PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations modelled with WRF-Chem

Two models and two emission databases – evaluation of the PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations modelled with

WRF-Chem and EMEP4PL

Małgorzata Werner, Maciej Kryza, Justyna Dudek

Department of Climatology and Atmosphere Protection

University of Wroclaw

Page 2: Two models and two emission databases – evaluation of the ...€¦ · Two models and two emission databases –evaluation of the PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations modelled with WRF-Chem

Aims

Validation of PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations for Poland for:• two different chemical transport models:

• WRF-Chem

• EMEP4PL

• two different emission databases:• a regional EMEP database,

• a national database provided by the Chief Inspectorate of Environmental Pollution in Poland

Page 3: Two models and two emission databases – evaluation of the ...€¦ · Two models and two emission databases –evaluation of the PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations modelled with WRF-Chem

Data and methods

• Chemical transport models:• WRF-Chem v. 3.9.1, chemical mechanisms: RADM2 + GOCART • EMEP4PL v. 4.17, chemical mechanisms: EmChem09• Two one-way nested domains: Europe at a 12 km×12 km grid and Poland at a 4 km×4

km

• Emissions: EMEP database for Europe, national database for Poland (GIOS)

• Verification by comparison with observations• 1 hourly concentrations• 46 stations for PM2.5 • 123 stations for PM10

Page 4: Two models and two emission databases – evaluation of the ...€¦ · Two models and two emission databases –evaluation of the PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations modelled with WRF-Chem

Data and methods

Simulations run for the entire year 2017 with both models and bothemission data bases:

• EMEP_eemep – model EMEP4PL, EMEP emission

• EMEP_egios – model EMEP4PL, GIOS emission

• WRFChem_eemp – model WRF-Chem, EMEP emission

• WRFChem_egios – model WRF-Chem, GIOS emission

Page 5: Two models and two emission databases – evaluation of the ...€¦ · Two models and two emission databases –evaluation of the PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations modelled with WRF-Chem

Model performance for the entire year

PM2.5 PM10

Page 6: Two models and two emission databases – evaluation of the ...€¦ · Two models and two emission databases –evaluation of the PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations modelled with WRF-Chem

PM2.5 - model performance according to seasons

Page 7: Two models and two emission databases – evaluation of the ...€¦ · Two models and two emission databases –evaluation of the PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations modelled with WRF-Chem

PM10 - model performance according to seasons

Page 8: Two models and two emission databases – evaluation of the ...€¦ · Two models and two emission databases –evaluation of the PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations modelled with WRF-Chem

Summary

• EMEP4PL and WRF-Chem with two emission databases (EMEP and GIOS national) were run for the year 2017 and validated againstPM2.5 and PM10 observations.

• For both models and both pollution better correlations are for the winter period than for summer.

• A significant positive impact on modelled results after includingnational emissions for both models and for PM10 and PM2.5

• Change of emission has bigger impact on the EMEP4PL simulationsthan on WRF-Chem.

Page 9: Two models and two emission databases – evaluation of the ...€¦ · Two models and two emission databases –evaluation of the PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations modelled with WRF-Chem

Acknowledgement

• This study was supported by the Polish National Science Centre grant no UMO-2017/25/B/ST10/01041 and UMO-2016/23/B/ST10/01797

• Calculations have been carried out using resources provided by Wroclaw Centre for Networking and Supercomputing (http://wcss.pl), grant No. 170