ug_tier i - evaluataion guidelines

8/10/2019 UG_Tier I - Evaluataion Guidelines

1/17


2/17


3/17

3 | P a g e

Criterion -2:Programme Outcomes

Criteria Compliance Non -Compliance

Without Concern With Concern Weakness Deficiency

There must be a documented process in place tomeasure the attainment of defined POs

There is a well-defineddocumented process inplace to quantify theattainment of POs.

Effectiveness of themechanism; Adequacyof the surveyquestionnaire and itsquality, sample size,diversity of thestakeholders, andfrequency of the

assessment are muchappreciable and aresupported by thedocuments andevidences.The process ofmeasuring theattainment of POs

through COs isdemonstrated andproperly documentedwith evidences.


Effectiveness of themechanism; Adequacyof the surveyquestionnaire and itsquality, sample size,diversity of thestakeholders, andfrequency of the

assessment are muchappreciable but are not supported by the eadequate documentsand evidences.The process ofmeasuring theattainment of POs

through COs isdemonstrated but not properly documentedwith necessaryevidences.


Effectiveness of themechanism ; Less adequacy of thesurvey questionnaireand its quality, samplesize, poor diversity ofthe stakeholders, andfrequency of the

assessment are not

appreciable and are not adequately supported by thedocuments andevidences.The process ofmeasuring the

attainment of POsthrough COs is not properly demonstrated and notdocumented withevidences.

There is no well-defined documentedprocess in place toquantify the attainment

of POs.


4/17

4 | P a g e




The defined COs must contribute to the

attainment of POs

Course outcomesshould reflect whatlevel of knowledgestudents gained,

skills acquired, traitsdeveloped uponsuccessfulcompletion of thecourse; COs must bemeasurable,attainable andmanageable in

number.COs shouldcontribute to attainPOs in such a waythat each CO shouldaddress at least oneof the POs and alsoeach PO must bereasonably addressed

by adequate numberof COs.

Course outcomesshould reflect whatlevel of knowledgestudents gained,skills acquired, traitsdeveloped uponsuccessfulcompletion of thecourse; COs must bemeasurable,attainable andmanageable innumber.COs are significantlycontributing to attain

professionalcompetence relatedPOs but not for

transferable skillsrelated POs..

Course outcomesshould reflect whatlevel of knowledgestudents gained,skills acquired, traitsdeveloped uponsuccessfulcompletion of thecourse; COs must bemeasurable,attainable andmanageable innumber.COs are notsignificantlycontributing to attain

both professionalcompetence related

POs and transferableskills related POs..

Course outcomes donot reflect whatknowledge levelstudents gained, skillsacquired, traitsdeveloped uponsuccessful completionof the course;Contribution of COs toattain all the definedPOs is poor.

Attainment of defined POs with respect to theGraduate Attributes (GAs) of NBA

1. Engineering Knowledge

The derived PO hasstrong correlation withthe respective GA, been



The derived PO doesnot have strongcorrelation with the


5/17

5 | P a g e




achieved throughcourse outcomes andsignificantlycontributed to achievethe PEOs. The target setfor the attainment ofeach PO is reasonable /justifiable by theprogrammecoordinator. Theattained level of eachPO is as close as /above the set target,well demonstrated andadequately evidencedby the relevantdocuments and theresults of interactionwith the stakeholders.

achieved throughcourse outcomes andsignificantlycontributed to achievethe PEOs. The target setfor the attainment ofeach PO is reasonable /justifiable by theprogrammecoordinator. Theattained level of eachPO is as close as /above the set target,well demonstrated andnot adequatelyevidenced by therelevant documentsand the results ofinteraction with thestakeholders.

achieved throughcourse outcomes andsignificantlycontributed to achievethe PEOs. The target setfor the attainment ofeach PO is reasonable /justifiable by theprogrammecoordinator. Theattained level of eachPO is not as close as tothe set target, not welldemonstrated and not adequately evidencedby the relevantdocuments and theresults of interactionwith the stakeholders.

respective GA, has not been achieved throughcourse outcomes andnot significantlycontributed to achievethe PEOs. The target setfor the attainment ofeach PO is not reasonable / justifiableby the programmecoordinator. Theattained level of eachPO is not as close as tothe set target, not welldemonstrated and not adequately evidencedby the relevantdocuments and theresults of interactionwith the stakeholders.

2. Problem Analysis ----------do----------- ----------do----------- ----------do----------- ----------do-----------

3. Design/development of solutions ----------do----------- ----------do----------- ----------do----------- ----------do-----------

4. Conduct investigations of complexproblems ----------do----------- ----------do----------- ----------do----------- ----------do-----------

5. Modern tool usage ----------do----------- ----------do----------- ----------do----------- ----------do-----------

6. The engineer and society ----------do----------- ----------do----------- ----------do----------- ----------do-----------


6/17

6 | P a g e




7. Environment and sustainability ----------do----------- ----------do----------- ----------do----------- ----------do-----------

8. Ethics ----------do----------- ----------do----------- ----------do----------- ----------do-----------

9. Individual and team work ----------do----------- ----------do----------- ----------do----------- ----------do-----------

10. Communication ----------do----------- ----------do----------- ----------do----------- ----------do-----------

11. Project management and finance ----------do----------- ----------do----------- ----------do----------- ----------do-----------

12. Life-long learning ----------do----------- ----------do----------- ----------do----------- ----------do-----------

Appropriate content delivery and assessmentmethods/tools should be employed in attainmentof POs

Appropriate andeffective content

delivery methodsand course outcomeassessment methods(both direct andindirect) areemployed towardsthe attainment ofPOs.

Innovative toolsemployed for contentdelivery andassessment haveevidenced thesignificantimprovement inattainment of POs.

Appropriate andeffective content

delivery methodsand course outcomeassessment methods(both direct andindirect) areemployed towardsthe attainment ofPOs.

No significantimprovements inattainment of POsafter employinginnovative tools forcontent delivery andassessment

No improvement inattainment of POsdue to contentdelivery andassessment methods.

No innovative

content delivery andassessment tools arefound.

Inappropriate andineffective contentdelivery methodsand course outcomeassessment methods(both direct andindirect) areemployed towardsthe attainment ofPOs


7/17

7 | P a g e




Curricular delivery and assessment methodsshould be amended based on the attainment ofPOs

Amendments incurricular delivery andassessment methodsbased on the

attainment of POs arewell demonstrated andadequately evidencedby the relevantdocuments and theresults of interactionwith the stakeholders.Significant

improvements areobserved throughamendments.

Amendmentscurricular delivery andassessment methodsbased on theattainment of POs arewell demonstrated andnot adequatelyevidenced by therelevant documentsand the results ofinteraction with thestakeholders.Significantimprovements areobserved throughamendments.

Amendmentscurricular delivery andassessment methodsbased on theattainment of POs arenot well demonstratedand not adequatelyevidenced by therelevant documentsand the results ofinteraction with thestakeholders.No Significantimprovements areobserved throughamendments.

No amendmentscurricular delivery and

assessment methodsbased on theattainment of POs .Not demonstrated andevidenced by therelevant documentsand the results ofinteraction with the

stakeholders

Each PO must contribute significantly to achieveat least one of the PEOs

Strong correlationbetween POs and PEOsis noticed, justified andadequately evidencedby the relevantdocuments and theresults of interactionwith the stakeholders.

Strong correlationbetween POs and PEOsis noticed, justified andnot adequately evidenced by the

relevant documentsand the results ofinteraction with thestakeholders.

Moderate correlationbetween POs and PEOsis noticed, justified andnot adequately evidenced by the

relevant documentsand the results ofinteraction with thestakeholders.

Weak correlationbetween POs and PEOsis noticed, justified andnot evidenced by therelevant documentsand the results ofinteraction with thestakeholders.

There must be a documented and effectiveprocess for the periodic review and revisions ofthese POs

There is a well-definedprocess/mechanism inplace for the periodicreview and revising



There is no well-definedprocesses/mechanismin place for the periodic


8/17

8 | P a g e




POs. The process isfunctional and effectiveto review the results ofattainment of POs andis evidenced by therelevant documents.

POs. The process isfunctional and effectiveto review the results ofattainment of POs andis not evidenced by therelevant documents.

POs. The process is not functional and effectiveto review the results ofattainment of POs andis not evidenced by therelevant documents.

review and revisingPOs.


9/17


10/17


11/17

11 | P a g e

Criterion -3:Programme Curriculum



supported by thedocuments and evidences.Few courses are designed,delivered and assessed bythe experts from therelevant industries.

adequately supported bythe documents andevidences. Atleast one course isdesigned, delivered andassessed by the expertsfrom the relevantindustries.

adequately supported bythe documents andevidences.


12/17

12 | P a g e

Criterion -4: Student Performance



Success rate, Academic performance, Placementand Higher Studies and Professional activitieswhich include entrepreneurship initiative,product design, innovations etc., must be inconsistent with attained POs and PEOs.

All the achieved

performance measuresmentioned in thecriterion must be inconsistent with theattained PEOs and POs

All must be inconsistent, exceptProfessional activities

All must be inconsistent, exceptProfessional activitiesand Placement andHigher Studies

No performancemeasure is consistentwith the attained PEOsand POs

Criterion -5: Faculty Contributions

Criteria

Compliance Non -Compliance


Faculty strength, qualification, cadre andcompetencies must help the graduates to attainthe defined COs and POs

All (Faculty strength,qualification, cadre,retention andcompetencies) musthelp to attain thedefined COs and POs

All, except cadre andretention must help toattain the defined COsand POs

All, except qualificationand competencies musthelp to attain thedefined COs and POs

No one does contributeto attain the definedCOs and POs


13/17

13 | P a g e

Criterion -5: Faculty Contributions

Criteria

Compliance Non -Compliance


Research activities of faculty includingconsultancy and knowledge transfer mustcontribute for better content delivery and projectwork towards the attainment of COs and POs

All (FRP, FIPR, FRDC,knowledge transfer)

transfer mustcontribute for bettercontent delivery andproject work towardsthe attainment of COsand POs

All, except FIPR andKnowledge transfer ,must contribute forbetter content deliveryand project worktowards the attainmentof COs and POs

All, except FRP andFRDC must contributefor better contentdelivery and projectwork towards theattainment of COs andPOs

No one does contribute

for better contentdelivery and projectwork towards theattainment of COs andPOs


14/17

14 | P a g e

Criterion -6 : Facilities and Technical Support



Facilities provided to faculty and students

including teaching aids, lecture halls, facultyrooms, engineering laboratories, equipment etc.and competent technical staff must be helpful toenhance and innovate the teaching learningprocess towards the attainment of POs

Attained level of POsexceeds the reasonablyset target

Set target and attainedlevel of POs arereasonable andacceptable

Set target and attainedlevel of POs arereasonable but notacceptable

Set target and attainedlevel of POs are notjustifiable but notacceptable


15/17


16/17

16 | P a g e

Criterion -8: Governance, Institutional Support and Financial Resources



Campus Infrastructure and other related facilitiesas library, internet, safety equipments,counselling and emergency medical care facilities

must satisfy the requirements of the programme

All made available,accessible andfunctional; and

effectively utilized

All made available,accessible andfunctional; but not


All made available,accessible but not fullyfunctional; and not


All made available,accessible but notfunctional and not

utilized

Budget allocated and utilized must be adequateto run the programme and audited statementsmust be made available for stakeholders

Both institute andprogramme budget areadequate, effectivelyutilized and auditedstatements are madeavailable forstakeholders

Both institute andprogramme budget areadequate andeffectively utilized; butaudited statements arenot made available forstakeholders

Both institute andprogramme budget areadequate but noteffectively utilized andaudited statements arealso not made

available forstakeholders

Both institute andprogramme budget areinadequate, not utilizedand auditedstatements are alsonot made available forstakeholders

Governing body, functional administrativestructure, policies and procedures,decentralization of power, delegation of financialpower, grievance redressal mechanism etc., mustsatisfy the requirements/norms of concernedregulatory authorities and helpful to progress

towards vision.

All must satisfy therequirements/norms ofconcerned regulatoryauthorities and helpfullarge extent to progresstowards vision .

All must satisfy therequirements/norms ofconcerned regulatoryauthorities and justhelpful to progresstowards vision.

All must satisfy therequirements/norms ofconcerned regulatoryauthorities but nothelpful to progresstowards vision.

Do not satisfy therequirements/norms ofconcerned regulatoryauthorities and nothelpful to progresstowards vision.


17/17

17 | P a g e

Criterion -9: Continuous Improvement



Improvements/attainments in SI, API, STR, FQI,FRP etc., must be appreciable

Either cent percentattainment orappreciableimprovements in allfor consecutive threeacademic years

Either cent percentattainment orappreciableimprovements in allexcept R&D andConsultancy

Appreciableimprovements in allexcept FQI andFaculty ResearchPublications, R&D andConsultancy

STR of at least 1:15 is notmet. No

attainment/improvementsin all for consecutive three

academic years

Efforts made by the faculty towards continuingeducation, new facility created and overcomingthe shortcomings listed during the lastaccreditation/since the inception of theprogramme must be evident

All the shortcomingslisted during lastaccreditation/since theinception of theprogramme wereovercome. Appreciableefforts were made bythe faculty towardscontinuing educationand creation of thenew facilities.

All the shortcomingslisted during lastaccreditation/since theinception of theprogramme wereovercome. Less effortswere made by thefaculty towardscontinuing educationand creation of thenew facilities.

All the shortcomingslisted during lastaccreditation/sincethe inception of theprogramme wereovercome. Nosignificant efforts weremade by the facultytowards continuingeducation and creationof the new facilities.

All the shortcomings listedduring lastaccreditation/since theinception of the

programme were notovercome. No efforts weremade by the facultytowards continuingeducation and creation ofthe new facilities.

ug_tier i - evaluataion guidelines

Documents