unesco institutional repository software comparison (guidelines)

8/13/2019 UNESCO Institutional Repository Software Comparison (Guidelines)

1/16

United NationsEducational, Scientific and

Cultural Organization

UNES

Inst it ut ional ReposInst it ut ional ReposSoftware omparisSoftware Compari

Text contribut

Jean Gabriel Bankier and Kenneth GleBEPRESS (http://www.bepress.

T y p e s e

t :

B a

l v i k a s

P r a

k a s a n

P v

t . L t d

. , N e w

D e

l h i

United NationsEducational, Scientific and

Cultural Organization

Open Access to Scientific Inform ationKnowledge Societies Division

7, place de FontenoyF-75352 Paris 07 SP FranceTel.: +33 (0) 1 45 68 43 65Mob: +33 (0) 6 52 82 99 69http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/access-to-knowledge/open-access-to-scientific-information/


2/16

P ublished in 2014 by the U nited Nations Educational, Scientific and C ultural O rganization, 7,

place de Fontenoy, 75352 P aris 07 SP, France

U N ESC O 2014

T his publication is available in O pen A ccess under the A ttribution-ShareA like 3.0 IG O (C C -B Y -SA

3.0 IG O ) license ( ). By using the content of

this publication, the users accept to be bound by the terms of use of the U N ESC O O pen A ccess

R epository ( ).

T he designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not

imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of U N ESC O concerning the legal

statusof any country, terri tory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerni ng the delimitation of i ts

frontiers or boundaries.

T he ideas and opinions expressedin thi s publication are those of the authors; they are notnecessarily those of U N ESC O and do not commit the O rganization.

G raphic/ C over design :

Bal Vik as P rakashan Pvt. L td.

D elhi - 110093, IN D IA

Email : balvikasnews@ gmail.com

http:/ / creativecommons.org/ licenses/ by-sa/ 3.0/ igo/

http:/ / www.unesco.org/ open-access/ terms-use-ccbysa-en
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/http://www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-enhttp://www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-enhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/


3/16

Institutional R epositories were first developed as an online solution for collecting, preserving, and

disseminating the scholarship of universities, colleges, and other research institutions. T he

repository quickly evolved into a platform for libraries to publish and showcase the entire breadth

of an institution's scholarship including articles, books, theses, dissertations, and journals. A dded

support for images, video, audio, and other media has brought greater depth to repository

collections. Si nce 2000, a number of repository platforms have been developed, each with their

own set of benefits and technical criteria.

Initially it was believed that repositories had to be open source and locally installed. T he open

source platforms offered unlimited flexibility for developers to build custom features andcollections. H owever, over the past decade, the platforms have been enhanced to include many of

the features that would previously have required local customization. A dditionally, the potential

high cost of ongoing development and maintenance of locally-hosted software has led many

institutions to move to hosted options. T he fear of lock-in associated with specific solutions has

also faded due to the success of interoperability tools, such as O A I-P M H , available on each of the

platforms. IR managers, sometimes on their second or thi rd IR platform, can attest to the relative

ease with which one can move from one platform to another.

A ll of these changes put libraries exploring IR s for the first time in an enviable position. T he

products have richer feature sets, and all the major platforms are avai lable as a hosted service,

which arguably has a lower total cost of ownership and is less time-consuming than running an IR

locally. L ibrarians are now truly free to compare platforms by focusing on the critical features that

will address their needs and make their repositories successful. T his guide compares the features of

the major platforms and is intended to help libraries focus on which features will help facili tate the

success of their repository. T he comparison i s divided into eleven categories to help librarians

identify the features that are most important to building a successful institutional repository

program at their institution.

In f ras t ruc ture : Starting with the fundamental features of the repository platform s, the

Infrastructure section covers installation, hosting, and customer support options.

Front -end Des ign : T he reader-facing, front-end design reflects institutional branding as

well as how the reader interacts with the repository. Integrated front-ends, customizable

repository designs, and mobile-optimi zed pages help ensure a optimal browsing

experience.

Conten t Organiza t ion & Cont ro l : L ibrarians interested in how each platform

supports content, access controls, and repository structure will find relevant information

here.

l

l

l

Guide to Inst it ut ional Reposit ory SAcomparison of the five most widely adopted IRplatforms: Digital Commons, Dspace, Eprints, Fedora, and Islandora


4/16

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

Content Discovery: Identifying the key features that increase the visibility of the

repository's content, C ontent D iscovery covers tools and options that help readers and

researchers discover scholarship.

Pub licat ion Tools: L ibrarians and editors evaluating publishing options will discover and

compare the necessary tools such as peer review, batch import, metadata options, and

editori al work flows to publish hi gh quality scholarship directly to the repository.

Repor t ing : P roviding feedback to administrators, editors, authors, and stakeholders is a

crucial aspect of a successful repository program. T his category outlines the reports

available on each platform

Multimedia: A modern feature of the repository, M ultimedia compares how each

platform manages images, video, and streaming services that add greater depth to

collections.

Social Features and Notif icat ions: B uilding on discoverabili ty and search engine

optimization, the social features of the repository provide a modern approach to engaging

readers by providing tools to follow, share, and bookmark scholarship in the repository.

Interoperabi l i ty: B eginning with O pen A rchives Ini tiative Protocol for M etadata

H arvesting (O A I-PM H ), the repository was built with dissemination in mind. T he

Interoperability category exami nes how each platform integrates with discovery services,

researcher profiles, and other repositories hosted on the same platform.

Authent icat ion: A lthough the majori ty of repository content is open access, institutional

login credentials remain an important aspect of how readers and researchers access

content across campus systems and the repository.

Accessibility: T he abili ty to offer access to those with varying abiliti es and disabili ties is afundamental feature of the repository. V PAT statements and section 508 compliance

show how each repository platform offers access to as many readers and researchers as

possible.

Preserva t ion : From L O C K SS-compliance to format migration, the preservation

category examines how each of the repository offerings preserves and maintains

repository content.

In f ras t ruc ture

Each of the platforms has its own unique features and technical criteria for developing and

supporting a repository program. T he Infrastructure section covers the basic attributes of eachrepository offering.

H osted, cloud-based solutions first became an opti on in 2005. Si nce then, cloud-based products

and services have become common service solutions across the internet, and other repository

developers have begun offering hosted options for their platforms. H osted solutions allow for

automatic system upgrades, as well as consistent platform versions across the community.

A dditionally, new features are immediately available without the need for local installation and

plugins. H osted solutions also free repository administrators and librarians to focus on the content,


5/16

Front -end De s ign

From a front-end, reader-facing standpoint, repository administrators want to guarantee that the

repository has a modern design that accurately reflects the branding and organizational structure

of their institution. T he abili ty to customize repository and publication designs provides the

scholarship with an official look and feel and k eeps branding consistent across the institution's

digital domains. M obile-optimized designs and H T M L 5 web pages help the growing number of

mobile researchers easily access content hosted in the repository. T he flexibility of a repository

rather than managing platform i nstallation and upgrades. A nother crucial component for success

is the level of support available for the platform. A ll the platforms offer community support;

however, a dedicated customer support team can increase the success of a repository. C onsulting,

training, and troubleshooti ng are common services for hosted platforms.

Community support

6.x-13.1.x and7.x-1.1

Infrastructure

Hosted Solution Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Customer support:

Email, phone,resource, andcommunity support

-

Proprietary

7.6

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Limited

Community support

Yes

Open Source

3.2

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Simple DublinCore only

Yes

Community support

Yes

Open Source

3.3.11

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Limited

Community support

Yes

Yes

Open Source

3.6.2

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Open Source

Yes

Yes

Yes Yes

Locally InstalledSoftware Solution

CustomerSupport/Community Support

Flexible RepositoryStructure

Simple and QualifiedDublinCore Metadata

CustomizableMetadata

Open Source/

ProprietaryAutomaticSystemUpgrades

Current StablePlatformVersion

AdministratorConfigurations

Supports StandardUser Roles

Digital Commons Dspace EPrints Fedora Islandora


6/16

structure will dictate how easily the repository reflects the departmental structure of an institution

as well as how readers and researchers access content.

Conten t O rgan iza t ion & Cont ro l

Since the institutional repository platform was developed, the focus on open access scholarship

has been an integral part of an IR program. While most institutions encourage open access

content across the repository, the need for access controls for specific content remains an

important aspect of the repository. T he platforms offer varying levels of pre-built and customizableaccess control ranging from embargo for ET D s to IP -access for campus-only content, user access,

and subscription management.

P ublications types available for administrators will dictate how content is organized and displayed

within a repository. With simple repository structures, collections or series of papers are used to

represent an entire department's scholarship. T his structure works well for small collections of pre-

or post-print articles, but becomes cumbersome for collections with a vari ety of content such as

conference proceedings, journal articles, ET D s, images, and books. M any of the platforms have

introduced dedicated or add-on publication types so that the original publication, such as a journal,

conference, or image gallery, can be represented as a publication in the repository. T he

representation of publications within the repository allows for meaningful, contextual navigationof scholarship and gives the repository greater depth.

A long with publication types, the ability to manage the display of articles withi n a publication i s a

key component of the repository. A flexible document structure allows articles to be organi zed in a

meaningful manner. Support for customizable metadata on the article page, supplemental arti cle

files such as datasets and media, P D F viewers, and custom cover page stamping provide

researchers with a contextual view of the content and how it relates the repository and institution.

Front-end Design

Integrated Front-end

Full-service Front-end Design

CustomizableRepository Design

CustomizablePublication Design

Mobile-optimizedDesign

HTML5 Web pages

Yes

Yes

Yes: Journals an Conferences

Yes

Yes

Yes

-

Yes

-

-

-

-

Yes

Yes

Yes

-

-

-

Yes

Yes

-

-

-

-

Yes

Yes

-

-

-

-



7/16

Content Organization&Control

Yes: IP range, user,and customizableXACML

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Add-on servicesavailable



PDF previewhoverover available

PDF Viewer onArticle Page

Supplemental/Additional ArticleFiles

CustomCover PageStamping

CreativeCommonslicense

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Yes

-

Yes

CustomizableMetadata OnArticle Pages

Open AccessPublishing

Access Controls

PublicationSubscriptionManagement

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes: IP range, user,and domain name

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-


Yes: CustomizableXACML

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-


Yes

Yes

Yes

-

-

-

Yes

Yes

-

-

-

-

-

-

Yes: IP range anduser

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Yes: User andrequest a copy


Auto-lift EmbargoSupport

CommunityPublication

Series/CollectionPublication

Conference andEvent Publication

Flexible DocumentOrganization

Journal Publication

ETDPublication

Book Publication

Image Gallery

Supports StandardFile Types (PDF,MSWord, RTF, etc.)

Yes

Yes

- -Add-on servicesavailable



8/16

Conten t Discovery

A s the variety of content in the repository has grown beyond pre- and post-print arti cles, the

discovery features within the repository have expanded to offer modern web features for readers

and researchers. Features such as advanced and faceted search tools, full text indexing, graphical

navigation, customizable browse opti ons, and geolocation allow researchers to more easily

browse content within the repository and have made the institutional repository a destination

rather than a storage place for articles.

D issemination beyond the repository is a key component of an IR platform. Success of a

repository program is based on how readers and researchers access the scholarship. Starti ng with

O pen A rchives Ini tiative Protocol for M etadata H arvesting (O A I-PM H ) repositories focused on

interoperability to guarantee integration with campus discovery services. A s search engines

became the foundational discovery tool of the internet, optimi zing the repository and its content

for search engines became an important focus for hosted and software repository solutions. With

optimi zation across major search engines, and specialized search engines like G oogle Scholar,repository content greatly improves in visibility and reaches a much wider researcher base.

Content Discovery

Integrated SearchEngine

Advanced Searchwith Facets

Full Text SearchIndexing

GraphicalNavigation of content

Geolocation Tools

Search EngineOptimization

Indexed in GoogleScholar

DOI and PersistentURLs

Browse Options

Yes

Yes

Yes

Image, icon,geolocation, andDisciplineWheelnavigation

Yes

Yes

Yes

-

Yes

Yes

Yes

Image and icon

Yes

Yes

Yes


Yes

Yes

Yes: Integration withGoogle Maps

Yes

Yes

Yes: Persistent URLand DOI

-

-

-

Yes: PersistentIdentifiers




Yes: PersistentIdentifiers

-

Limited

Yes

Yes: Handle System

Yes: Google Mapsexport

Yes

Yes

Yes: DOI

discipline, community,publication, publicationyear, document type,author, andinstitution

collections andsearch facets

collections andsearch facets

communities &collections,publication date,author, title, subject,and document type

department, subject,year

Image

-



9/16

Pub licat ion Tools

T he success of open access scholarship and institutional repositories has allowed the library to take

an active role in publishing. With dedicated and add-on publications, the repository has the abili ty

to represent journals, conferences, and galleries within the repository. Edi tors equipped with

dedicated publication tools have the ability to manage scholarship from submission to final

publication.

Flexible editorial work flows allow editors to adapt to each publication's needs. C ustomizable

submit forms and metadata guarantee that the publication will capture all the necessary

informati on for each submission. Integrated peer-review tools allow editors to manage and assign

reviews and mak e final editori al decisions. Edi tor and reviewer noti fications increase the efficiency

of the peer review process by automatically notifying editors and reviewers when actions have

been made or need to be taken. Finally, the automatic conversion of full text fi les to P D F, along

with cover page stamping, will provide high quality full texts for editors, reviewers, and readers.

A dditional batch publication tools also play an important role by offering tools for revision,

collection, and bringing back content, such as past journal issues, to the repository. A s repositoriesmove publications online that were hosted on another platform or were previously print-only,

batch import allows editors to import and publish a large amount of back content quickly.

Si mi larly, batch revision tools allow editors to quickly make metadata or full-text changes to a large

number of records. A fter publication, auto-collection tools allow editors to host the article in

multiple publications without having to publish multiple times.

Link ResolverIntegration

Citation Export

Yes

Yes: Zotero, Endnote,and RefWorks

Yes

Yes: COinSsupport


Yes: COinSsupport

Yes

Yes: COinSsupport

Yes

Yes: BibTeX, refer,Endnote, andadditional

bibliographymanagers

Publication Tools

Integrated PeerReviewTools

Role-based JournalEditor Permissions

Flexible PublishingWorkflows

CustomizableSubmit Forms

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

-

-

Yes

Yes

-

-

Yes

Yes

-

-

Limited

Yes

-

-

Yes

Yes



10/16

Repor t ing

T he modern repository offers highly discoverable content across discovery services and search

engines. Engaging, browsable user interfaces have made the repository a destination rather than a

holding pen for articles. While these improvements have improved traffic and visibility of the

repository, the need for reporting tools to provide feedback to administrators, editors, authors,

and repository stak eholders remains a crucial aspect of proving a successful repository program.

R eports for publication metadata, usage and downloads, and G oogle A nalytics integration come

in a variety of pre-built or customizable formats across the repository platforms. A uthor reports

offer a k ey feedback loop that allows authors to see the impact and usage statistics of their work ,

providing incentive to upload more of their scholarship to the repository. Stakeholder reports

provide excellent repository usage statistics to those helping fund or promote the repository on the

campus.

Auto-Conversion of Full text files to PDF

Retain Metadata andFull Text Revisions

Batch Revision

Batch Revision

Batch Import

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes: XML andMicrosoft Excelimport tools

-

-

-

Yes

Yes: XML import

-

-

-

Yes

Yes

-

-

Yes: Bibliographicimport tool andsimple archiveformat

Yes

-

-

-

-

Yes

Yes: BibTeX, XMLand additionalplugins available

Reporting

Editor Reports

Usage/Download

ReportsStakeholder Reports

Author Reports

Google AnalyticsIntegration

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes


Add-on services

availableAdd-on servicesavailable

-

-


Yes

-


Yes


Yes

-

-



Add-on services

available-

-

Yes



11/16

Multimedia

A dding greater depth to articles and collections housed in the repository, multimedia plays an

important role in the repository. Starting with supplemental content for articles, sound clips,

images, and videos became a way to better supplement and represent the scholarship. D igiti zed

image collections led the way to the development of dedicated image galleries. N ew features, such

as graphical navigation, slideshows, and integrated streaming media services provide readers and

researchers an engaging way to navigate and view media withi n the repository.

Social Featu res a nd Notificat ions

Social network s have changed the way that we interact with content and social contacts. A dding a

personal, networking layer to the internet has allowed individuals to collaborate and share contentlik e never before. R eaders and researchers of repository scholarship have taken advantage of the

new social tools available to them by book marking and sharing content to network s, groups,

collaborators, and followers. B y offering tools to allow users of the repository to easily follow,

share, and book mark content on the repository, readers and researchers help expand the reach

and visibili ty of the repository.

Multimedia

StreamingMultimedia

Slideshows

Images

Audio

Video

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes



solution packavailable



-


Social Features andNotifications

Follow

RSS

Share

Bookmark

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes Yes Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

-



Yes


-

-


-




12/16

Interoperabi l i ty

T he interoperabili ty of a product is its abili ty to work with and integrate with other products and

services. O pen A rchives Ini tiative P rotocol for M etadata H arvesting (O A I-P M H ) was developed at

the same time as the institutional repository so platforms could easily provide a uniform output for

the dissemination of content. T he interoperabili ty category examines how each platform

integrates with other products through O A I-P M H , discovery services, researcher profi les, and

other repositories hosted on the same platform.

Authent icat ion

T he majority of repository content is open access and does not require user authentication to gain

access; however, authenti cation remain an important aspect of how readers and researchers

access content across campus systems and the repository. T he most common institutional

authentication tools compared allow users to login using institutional login credentials without the

need to create a separate repository account.

Publication andAuthor Mailing Lists

Reader CommentsSaved Searches Yes

Yes


-

-

- Yes

-

-

-

-

--

-

-

Interoperability

Harvesting(OAI-PMH)Network of PlatformRepositories

Integration withDiscovery Platforms

Integration withResearch ProfilePages

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes: DigitalCommons Network

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

-

Yes

Yes

-

-

-

-

Yes

Yes


-

-


Authentication

LDAP

CAS

SystemAccounts

Shibboleth

Yes

Yes

Yes

-

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

-

Yes

Yes



13/16

Preserva t ion

With the move from print to digital publication, preservation has become a constant topic of

discussion. From basic storage on local servers to robust, digital preservation platforms,

institutions around the world are searching for the most cost-effective way to maintain their digital

scholarship for the future scholars of the world. Basic preservation services such as content back,

provide X M L -based copy of content so that it can be stored and imported into other new

repositories and services. Format migration tools and services help administrators mi grate full text

file formats, such as M S Word documents or P D Fs, into a new modern format i f the standard

format changes. Interoperability (outlined in the Interoperability category) also plays an important

role in preservation. O A I-PM H support allows for integration with preservation platforms.L O C K SS (L ots of C opies K eep Stuff Safe), developed at Stanford, i s a library-focused, open

source system that allows the preservation of subscription-based material as well as open access

content. T he peer-to-peer LO C K SS system keeps copies of scholarship across a network of

institutions to preserve and disseminate content if the original publisher or repository ceases to

exist. L O C K SS support is an inexpensive yet reliable method of preserving repository scholarship.

Accessibility

Web accessibly is the ability of a website to offer access to those with varying abilities and

disabilities. A ccessibility is a fundamental feature of the repository that dictates how screen readers

and other devices can help readers and researchers view content. A ccessible repositories are built

in a logical structure to provide quality access to those with visual, motor/ mobili ty, auditory,

seizures, and cognitive disabilities. A Voluntary P roduct A ccessibility Template (V PA T ) statement

outlines a website's compliance with 508 accessibility standards.

Accessibility

VPATStatement

Section 508CompliantWCAG(Web ContentAccessibilityGuidelines)

Yes

Yes

Yes

-

-

-

Yes

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-



14/16

Conclusion

A fter more than a decade of expanding the reach of scholarship, the institutional repository

continues to develop and offer modern tools for libraries and researchers. While the foundational

elements of collection, preservation, and dissemination remai n intact, the repository platform

options continue to offer new and exciting ways to expand readership. L ibrary-led publishing

efforts and the desire to represent the entire breadth of an institution's research through journals,

image collections, and book s have made the repository a destination rather than a holding place

for pre- and post-prints. With a variety of platforms available, an institution looking to start a

repository program or move to a new platform has many opti ons and features to compare. L ocally

hosted software offers customizations unique to the institution, but requires repository

programming and IT teams to build and maintain. T he cloud-based, hosted platforms offer aturnkey solution with consistent platform versions, upgrades, and customer support that will assist

the library in developing a successful repository. U ltimately, the institution must evaluate its

collections, technical expertise, and research distribution strategy in order to choose the platform

that will best support its research goals.

Methodology

T he Institutional R epository Software C omparison G uide was written for institutions evaluating

repository platforms. It i s intended to serve as a resource for academi c libraries that are creating a

repository program from scratch, as well as those look ing to upgrade platforms.

D ata from three sites (R egistry of O pen A ccess R epositories (R O A R ), T he Directory of O pen

A ccess R epositori es O penD O A R ), and Repository 66) were used to determine which platforms

made the short li st. T he list was further pared down to the final top fi ve finalists by examining

product information on the various platforms' websites and conducting extensive interviews with

repository managers. R epository platforms with active user communi ties, the most robust feature

sets, and the largest number of installati ons were chosen for evaluation.

Preservation

Content Back Up

LOCKSS-compliant

Format Migration Tools and Services

Yes: XML-based,quarterly contentdelivery

Yes

Yes

Yes: ArchivalInformationPackages back up



Managed byinstitution

Yes


Yes: XML export

-

Integrated formatmigration risks toolsoffer format advicefor administrators

Yes: XML export

-




15/16

T he platforms were evaluated based on twelve categori es. T he categories were designed around

the common themes that emerge when building and maintaining a successful repository program.

T he categories cover a wide range of repository management topi cs from infrastructure

information (how the repository is installed, hosted, and maintained) to publication andpreservation of content. T hey will enable a reader to easily evaluate the different repositories by

focusing on key solution attributes. A dozen categories might initially seem excessive; however, all

twelve are necessary to accurately assess the modern repository's expansive set of features for

managing a wide breadth of scholarly output.

Each category contains a set of features that are key components of a modern institutional

repository. T he features were evaluated based on the most current version of each of the

platforms. T he informati on was gathered from avai lable resources of each platform's website,

community wik i pages, demo sites, developer pages, user documentation, and presentations. T he

three possible responses include Yes, - , or A dd-on services available . When appropri ate,

additional informati on is provided. Yes responses indicate that the feature is available in the

default installation of the repository. A dd-on services available responses indicate that the

feature is available by custom installation by a development team or third party company. -

responses indicate that the feature is not available in the default installation, add-on services are

not readily available, or the information was not readily available from the platform's

documentation.

T his guide is not intended to be used solely by IR experts. Each of the dozen categori es has an

introductory paragraph to ensure that even an individual researching IR s for the first tim e will have

the required understanding of the needs that those features address.

R e s o u r c e s

P la t formsl (R O A R ) - http:/ / roar.eprints.org/l T he D irectory of O pen A ccess R epositories (O penD O A R ) -l R epository 66 -l R esearch on Institutional R epositories: A rticles and Presentations -

Dig ita l Comm onsl D igital C ommons Website -l D igital C ommons R eference M aterial and U ser G uides -

l O utreach Toolkits and T utorials -

R egistry of O pen A ccess R epositori es

http:/ / www.opendoar.org/

http: / / maps.repository66. org/

http:/ / digitalcommons.bepress.com/ repository-research/

http:/ / digitalcommons.bepress.com/

http:/ / digitalcommons.bepress.com/ reference/

http:/ / digitalcommons.bepress.com/ toolkits/
http://roar.eprints.org/http://www.opendoar.org/http://maps.repository66.org/http://digitalcommons.bepress.com/repository-research/http://digitalcommons.bepress.com/http://digitalcommons.bepress.com/reference/http://digitalcommons.bepress.com/toolkits/http://digitalcommons.bepress.com/toolkits/http://digitalcommons.bepress.com/reference/http://digitalcommons.bepress.com/http://digitalcommons.bepress.com/repository-research/http://maps.repository66.org/http://www.opendoar.org/http://roar.eprints.org/


16/16

D s p a c el D space Website -l D space R esources -l T he D Space 2013 RoadM ap and 3-5 Year V ision-

l D Space 2013 R oadM ap and V ision V ideo O verview -

l D spaceD irect -l D space Wiki -l D space Training M aterials -

Eprintsl ePrints Website -l

ePrints Services -l eP rints Wikil ePrints T raining M aterials -l ePrints D emo Site -

Fedoral Fedora C omm ons Website -l Fedora R epository O verview P D F -

l Fedora 3.7 D ocumentation -

l Fedora D eveloper's Forum -

l Fedora U ser Interface P rojects -

l Fedora R epository Development Wiki -

I s landoral Islandora Website -l Islandora T imeline -l Islandora D ocumentation W ik i -

l Islandora YouT ube Channel -l IslandoraJira Website -l Islandora Sandbox Website -l D iscoveryG arden -

http:/ / www.dspace.org/

http:/ / www.dspace.org/ resources

http:/ / duraspace.org/ dspace-2013-

roadmap-and-3-5-year-vision

http:/ / www.youtube.com/ watch?v= JtnjPk9qS_k& feature= youtu.be

http:/ / dspacedirect.org/

https:/ / wik i.duraspace.org/ display/ D SPA C E/ H ome

http:/ / www.dspace.org/ new-user-training

http:/ / www.eprints.org/

http:/ / www.eprints.org/ us/http:/ / wiki. eprints.org/ w/ M ain_Page

http: / / www.eprints.org/ software/ training/

http: / / demoprints.eprints.org/

http:/ / www.fedora-commons.org/

http:/ / www.duraspace.org/ sites/ default/ files/ u9/ O pentech_specsht_FedoraC _12. pdf

https:/ / wiki. duraspace.org/ display/ FED O R A 37/ Fedora+ 3.7+ D ocumentation

https:/ / wiki .duraspace.org/ display/ D EV / D eveloper% 27s+ Forum

https:/ / wiki .duraspace.org/ display/ D EV / Fedora+ U ser+ Interface+Projects

https:/ / wiki .duraspace.org/ display/ FC R EP O / Fedora+ R epository+ D evelopment+Wiki

http:/ / islandscholar.ca/

http:/ / islandora.ca/ timeline

https:/ / wiki. duraspace.org/ display/ ISL A N D O R A / Islandora

http: / / www.youtube.com/ user/ Islandora

https:/ / jira.duraspace.org/ browse/ ISL A N D O R A

http:/ / sandbox7.i slandora.ca/

http:/ / discoverygarden.ca/
http://duraspace.org/dspace-2013-roadmap-and-3-5-year-visionhttp://www.dspace.org/http://www.dspace.org/resourceshttp://duraspace.org/dspace-2013-roadmap-and-3-5-year-visionhttp://duraspace.org/dspace-2013-roadmap-and-3-5-year-visionhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtnjPk9qS_k&feature=youtu.behttp://dspacedirect.org/https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Homehttp://www.dspace.org/new-user-traininghttp://www.eprints.org/http://www.eprints.org/us/http://wiki.eprints.org/w/Main_Pagehttp://www.eprints.org/software/training/http://demoprints.eprints.org/http://www.fedora-commons.org/http://www.duraspace.org/sites/default/files/u9/Opentech_specsht_FedoraC_12.pdfhttps://wiki.duraspace.org/display/FEDORA37/Fedora+3.7+Documentationhttps://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DEV/Developer%27s+Forumhttps://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DEV/Fedora+User+Interface+Projectshttps://wiki.duraspace.org/display/FCREPO/Fedora+Repository+Development+Wikihttp://islandscholar.ca/http://islandora.ca/timelinehttps://wiki.duraspace.org/display/ISLANDORA/Islandorahttp://www.youtube.com/user/Islandorahttps://jira.duraspace.org/browse/ISLANDORAhttp://sandbox7.islandora.ca/http://discoverygarden.ca/http://discoverygarden.ca/http://sandbox7.islandora.ca/https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/ISLANDORAhttp://www.youtube.com/user/Islandorahttps://wiki.duraspace.org/display/ISLANDORA/Islandorahttp://islandora.ca/timelinehttp://islandscholar.ca/https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/FCREPO/Fedora+Repository+Development+Wikihttps://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DEV/Fedora+User+Interface+Projectshttps://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DEV/Developer%27s+Forumhttps://wiki.duraspace.org/display/FEDORA37/Fedora+3.7+Documentationhttp://www.duraspace.org/sites/default/files/u9/Opentech_specsht_FedoraC_12.pdfhttp://www.fedora-commons.org/http://demoprints.eprints.org/http://www.eprints.org/software/training/http://wiki.eprints.org/w/Main_Pagehttp://www.eprints.org/us/http://www.eprints.org/http://www.dspace.org/new-user-traininghttps://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Homehttp://dspacedirect.org/http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtnjPk9qS_k&feature=youtu.behttp://duraspace.org/dspace-2013-roadmap-and-3-5-year-visionhttp://www.dspace.org/resourceshttp://www.dspace.org/

unesco institutional repository software comparison (guidelines)

Documents