university of oxford national data – local knowledge using administrative data david mclennan...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
213 views
TRANSCRIPT
University of Oxford
National data – local knowledge
Using administrative data
David McLennan & Kate Wilkinson
Social Disadvantage Research CentreDepartment of Social Policy and Social Work
University of Oxford
University of Oxford
Administrative data: a targeting, monitoring and evaluation resource
University of Oxford
National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal
Aims to ‘narrow the gap’ between the most deprived neighbourhoods and the rest of the country of a range of key outcomes
Five priority themes identified:
Lower Worklessness
Lower Crime
Better Health
Better Skills
Better Housing the Physical Environment
University of Oxford
Measuring Outcomes
Establish baseline
Pre- and Post-intervention
NDC v LA v Region v England
Time series
What is success?
Sustainability
University of Oxford
Evaluation data sources
Census+ near 100% coverage of entire population+ results reliable at small area level- only every ten years- few suitable indicators of social deprivation- extremely expensive
Surveys+ clear research focus
+ many valuable indicators of social deprivation
- sampling error
- results often not reliable at small area level
- very expensive
Administrative Data+ near 100% coverage of population of
interest+ constantly updated+ results reliable at small area level+ already collected for operational purpose- some indicators are proxies- dependent upon support of data providers- data protection
University of Oxford
Worklessness and Low Income
University of Oxford
Worklessness & Low Income
Worklessness
Worklessness: Unemployment + Work-Limiting Illness
Unemployment: numbers and proportions of people aged 16-59 receiving Job Seekers Allowance
Work-Limiting Illness: numbers and proportions of people aged 16-59 receiving Incapacity Benefit or Severe Disablement Allowance
‘Exit Rates’ from unemployment, illness and overall worklessness
Low Income
Proportion of adults and dependent children (aged 0-59) living in households receiving means-tested out-of-work benefits (Income Support + income-based Job Seekers Allowance)
University of Oxford
Work and Pensions Longitudinal Study
Database of all spells of benefit receipt (DWP) and all tax records (HMRC) from June 1999 onwards.
Spells linked together using individual person unique reference number.
Includes details of person’s age, gender, home postcode, number of children, age of youngest child, spell type, spell start and end etc.
Over 164 million records and growing…
DWP’s primary research tool and the source for their neighbourhood statistics data
University of Oxford
Worklessness example
An NDC area sees its unemployment rate change as follows: 12% in 2001 10% in 2003 8% in 2005while the local authority unemployment rate stays the same.
Success?
Change in unemployment rate could be due to:a) unemployed people in the NDC area moving into jobsb) unemployed people in the NDC becoming unable to work due to illnessc) new people moving into the NDC area who are not unemployed
University of Oxford
Health
University of Oxford
Health Indicators
Standardised Mortality Ratio
A measure of the number of deaths in the NDC area compared to the expected level given the area’s age and gender structure
Standardised Illness Ratio
A measure of the prevalence of illness in the NDC area compared to the expected level given the area’s age and gender structure
Mental Illness Rate
proportion of adults under 60 suffering from mood or anxiety disorders in each area
Low Birth Weight
Percentage of single live births classed as low birth weight in a 5 year time period
University of Oxford
Standardised Mortality Ratio
University of Oxford
Crime
University of Oxford
Crime Indicators
Violence Rate
Number of violent crimes per 1000 ‘at-risk’ population
Burglary Rate
Number of burglaries per 1000 ‘at-risk’ properties
Theft Rate
Number of thefts per 1000 ‘at-risk’ population
Criminal Damage Rate
Number of criminal damage crimes per 1000 ‘at-risk’ population
‘Total Crime’ Rate
Number of violence, burglary, theft and criminal damage crimes per 1000 ‘at-risk’ population
University of Oxford
Crime Rate Numerators
Individual level recorded crime from all 39 police forces
Crime type, date/time occurrence, date recorded, grid reference and/or postcode of occurrence
33 different crime types under the broad headings of: Violence crime
Burglary
Theft
Criminal Damage
University of Oxford
University of Oxford
University of Oxford
University of Oxford
½ a crime to non-NDC area
½ a crime to NDC area
University of Oxford
Estimates of properties / population ‘at-risk’
At risk properties =Residential properties+ Commercial/industrial properties
At risk population = Resident population (minus prison)+ Workers+ Students+ Shoppers / recreational users + Passers by+ etc…
University of Oxford
Estimates of properties / population ‘at-risk’
At risk properties =Residential properties Total Dwellings (Census)+ Commercial/industrial properties + OS Address Point
At risk population = Resident population (minus prison) Resident
Population (estimates)+ Workers - Prison Pop+ Students + Workplace Pop (Census)+ Shoppers / recreational users + Passers by+ etc…
University of Oxford
Estimates of properties / population ‘at-risk’
At risk properties =Residential properties Total Dwellings (Census)+ Commercial/industrial properties + OS Address Point
At risk population = Resident population (minus prison) Resident
Population (estimates)+ Workers - Prison Pop+ Students+ Students + Workplace Pop (Census)+ Shoppers / recreational users+ Shoppers / recreational users + Passers by+ Passers by+ etc…+ etc…
University of Oxford
Education
University of Oxford
Indicators & data sources
INDICATORS DATA SOURCES
Pupil attainment at Key Stage 2 (age 11) - % achieving level 4 in English, maths, science
Pupil Level Annual Schools Census (PLASC) – DfES, collected annually, pupil information including home postcode
National Pupil Database (NPD) – DfES, collected annually, pupil test scores
Pupil attainment at Key Stage 3 (age 14), % achieving level 5 in English, maths, science
Pupil attainment at Key Stage 4 – GCSE (age 16), % achieving 5 or more A*-C grades
% pupils staying in full-time education post 16
Child Benefit – HMRC, annual snapshot, counts of children by age, area of residence and gender
% 18-20 year olds accepted to higher education
Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS) and Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) – collected annually, includes age, outcome of application and postcode
University of Oxford
Using the education data
A picture of educational performance and attainment from age 11-20 to allow comparison: over time; with Government targets; with district, regional and national figures
Cohort tracking – track performance of 2002 KS2 cohort to 2005 KS3
Example – KS4 performance 2002-2005, NDC, LA and Region
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
55%
60%
2002 2003 2004 2005
% 5
or
mo
re A
*-C
at
GC
SE
NDC
Local authority / Unitary authority
Region
University of Oxford
Data limitations – some examples
Staying on rate and entry to higher education indicators are proxies not actual measurements
Pupil cohorts can have different characteristics across years
Education indicators may not be comparable with locally sourced statistics or national statistics from different providers:
GCSE indicator dependent on whether pupils are included who left school at 16 and were not entered for any exams
KS2 and KS3 also depend on whether or not pupils who are absent for the test are included in the denominator( for example)
DfES generally produces data at school level rather than area level – all NDC pupils do not go to the same schools…
University of Oxford
Coping with data limitations
Look at outcomes across the age range – performance across the range of indicators often varies by NDC
Consider change across a long time-series – data is available from 2002-2005, looking at a longer time period is a better indicator of long-term trends
Use survey data to supplement administrative indicators Remember that indicator definitions are consistent between areas and
over time BUT other factors (i.e. pupil characteristics) can influence performance and these vary over time and between areas
In Summary… Performance across the range of education indicators varies within an
NDC Changes over time are important as well as relative performance – all
areas start from a different baseline
University of Oxford
NDC variation across education indicators
1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36
Range of ranks
London
Midlands
North
South
University of Oxford
Housing
University of Oxford
Indicators & data sources
Mean price of houses sold by type: flats, terraced, semi-detached, detached, Source: Land Registry
Number of houses sold by type: flats, terraced, semi-detached, detached, Source: Land Registry
Uses & limitations
Comparing change in house prices over time and relative to district, region and England
However…. No information about type of house i.e. no. of bedrooms so difficult to make
accurate comparisons No information about turnover i.e. rate of house sales – will be available in the
future From current data difficult to draw conclusions about area desirability
University of Oxford
Population Estimates
University of Oxford
Methodology & data sources
Population counts by age and gender within 5 year age groupings from 1999-2005
Population counts from various administrative data sources: Child Benefit (0-14) Patient Registration (0-90+) Super Older Persons Database (65+)
Only Patient Registration data covers the entire age range and all data sets known to have weaknesses in particular areas and for particular age ranges
Methodology developed to test data reliability and make population estimates based on relative accuracy of each data source
ONS work on producing small area estimates used to supplement and improve our methodology
University of Oxford
Uses & limitations
Population change can be an indicator of area desirability….. BUT Estimates are estimates and may be inaccurate – they rely on the quality of the
administrative data Local authority mid-year estimates have been revised since 2001 Populations may change as a result of housing regeneration
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
% t
ota
l p
op
ula
tio
n c
han
ge
2001
-200
5
LondonMidlandsNorthSouth
University of Oxford
Summary
University of Oxford
Administrative data indicators
Useful tool for measuring performance at NDC level because:
Data is collected routinely for operational purposes so enables a consistent time-series to be built up
They enable measurement across a variety of themes so can be linked to specific interventions
They do not suffer from sampling error so reliable at small area level
They can be easily and consistently compared over time and between areas
but there are limitations….
University of Oxford
Administrative data limitations
There may be differences in definitions, data sources and time collection points between local and national data
National data available from different providers and may use different definitions
Sometimes indicators are proxies or estimates of events or outcomes
Care needed attributing indicator changes to programme interventions
Suggestions or comments on indicator packages and data provision are welcome and are best directed through the NDC Reference Group.