unravelling host plant resistance in chrysanthemum using nmr suzanne kos, msc
TRANSCRIPT
• Ecometabolomic approach– Bioassays to determine resistance– Metabolomics to identify metabolites– In vitro bioassays for confirmation
• Western flower thrips – Polyphagous pest– Silver and growth damage– Transmission of plant viruses
Introduction
Ecometabolomic approach
• Senecio (Leiss et al. 2009) – PAs jacobine, jaconine N-oxide – The flavanoid kaempferol glucoside
• Tomato (Mirnezad et al. 2009) – Acylsugars
• Carrot (Leiss et al. 2013) – The flavanoid luteolin– The phenylpropanoid sinapic acid – The amino acid beta-alanine
Chrysanthemum
• Important Dutch greenhouse ornamental• Pest problem: western flower thrips, celery
leafminer and two-spotted spider mite • Leiss et al. (2009) identified chlorogenic
acid as resistance factor for thrips
1. In-vivo bioassay with 73 cultivars in greenhouse
2. In-vivo bioassays with 12 cultivars in climate room
3. Identification and quantification of metabolites with NMR
4. Cross reference of resistance by in-vitro bioassay
Ecometabolomic approach
1. In-vivo bioassay with 73 cultivars in greenhouse
• 73 cultivars, 5 replicates each• Five adult thrips per plant released • Scored thrips silver damage after 3 ½ weeks
1. In-vivo bioassay with 73 cultivars in greenhouse
• 5 replicates per cultivar• 5 adult thrips per plant released • Scored thrips silver damage after 3 ½ weeks
F=7.571, df=72, p<0.001
1. In-vivo bioassay with 73 cultivars in greenhouse
• 5 replicates per cultivar• 5 adult thrips per plant released • Scored thrips silver damage after 3 ½ weeks
F=7.571, df=72, p<0.001
2. In-vivo bioassays with 12 cultivars in climate room
• Twenty unsexed adult thrips per leaf in Petri dish for 24h.
• All larvae that emerged from eggs were counted.
• Different protons in a molecule resonate at slightly different frequencies when placed in a magnetic field depending upon the details of the electron motion in the nearby atoms.
• Structural information about molecules
• Easy sample preparation and highly reproducable
• Quantification
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
14
Phenolics Carbohydrates, PAs
Amino acids, terpenoids
15
15
15
16
16
16
1616
18
1818
18
8
8
8
8
8
29
29
29
29
54
5454
54
54
424242
4242
48
48
48
48
4869
69
69
6969
73
73
575757
58 58
58
58
PL
S-D
A c
ompo
nent
2 (
31.6
%)
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15PLS-DA component 1 (41.0%)
10
3. Identification and quantification of metabolites with NMR
Resistant
Susceptible
R2=91,4% Q2=68,5%
w*c
[2]
-0,2
-0,15
-0,1
-0,05
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
-0,2 -0,15 -0,1 -0,05 0 0,05 0,1w*c[1]
3. Identification and quantification of metabolites with NMR
Resistant
Susceptible
1. In-vivo bioassay with 73 cultivars in greenhouse
2. In-vivo bioassays with 12 cultivars in climate room
3. Identification and quantification of metabolites with NMR
4. Cross reference of resistance by in-vitro bioassay
Ecometabolomic approach
Acknowledgements
C. Hermans
Dr. K.A. LeissProf. P. Klinkhamer
Dr. Y.H. Choi
Plant Ecology and Phytochemistry group: Funding provided by:
In cooperation with: