unsw cle 19 july 20011 privacy and law enforcement in the on-line world – the bigger picture....
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: UNSW CLE 19 July 20011 Privacy and Law enforcement in the on-line world – the bigger picture. Nigel Waters Convenor, Australian Privacy Charter Council](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082518/5697c01a1a28abf838ccebdf/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
UNSW CLE 19 July 2001 1
Privacy and Law enforcement in the on-line world
– the bigger picture.
Nigel WatersConvenor, Australian Privacy Charter Council
Pacific Privacy ConsultingUNSW CLE Seminar – eSecurity & eCrime
19 July, 2001
![Page 2: UNSW CLE 19 July 20011 Privacy and Law enforcement in the on-line world – the bigger picture. Nigel Waters Convenor, Australian Privacy Charter Council](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082518/5697c01a1a28abf838ccebdf/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
UNSW CLE 19 July 2001 2
Introduction
• Narrow battles vs big picture
• Incremental loss of privacy
• Regulability of cyberspace depends on architecture – (Lessig 1999)– Choice to be made– Fully informed debate or vested interests– Globalistation
![Page 3: UNSW CLE 19 July 20011 Privacy and Law enforcement in the on-line world – the bigger picture. Nigel Waters Convenor, Australian Privacy Charter Council](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082518/5697c01a1a28abf838ccebdf/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
UNSW CLE 19 July 2001 3
Security & Privacy
• Can co-incide– Audit trails
• Security independent of type of information
• With Personal information, tension arises– Security vs other privacy principles– Employees and customers/public
![Page 4: UNSW CLE 19 July 20011 Privacy and Law enforcement in the on-line world – the bigger picture. Nigel Waters Convenor, Australian Privacy Charter Council](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082518/5697c01a1a28abf838ccebdf/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
UNSW CLE 19 July 2001 4
Powers to invade privacy
• Legal entities – arguments for transparency, but powers now being used against individuals
• Business/personal distinction blurring– ABN holders
• Privacy laws have no effective limiting function in the face of other laws
![Page 5: UNSW CLE 19 July 20011 Privacy and Law enforcement in the on-line world – the bigger picture. Nigel Waters Convenor, Australian Privacy Charter Council](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082518/5697c01a1a28abf838ccebdf/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
UNSW CLE 19 July 2001 5
Search and Communications Interception powers
• Inconsistent approach to electronic data vs physical intrusion – why?– Eg: ATO, Centrelink ‘notices’– Even looser controls in IPP11, NPP2
• Telecommunications– Warrants for content (but not all?)– Certificates– On request
![Page 6: UNSW CLE 19 July 20011 Privacy and Law enforcement in the on-line world – the bigger picture. Nigel Waters Convenor, Australian Privacy Charter Council](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082518/5697c01a1a28abf838ccebdf/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
UNSW CLE 19 July 2001 6
Interception Warrants
• Progressive weakening of controls– Judges to AAT members– Named person warrants– Period of warrant– Range of offences– No of agencies– More agencies with direct access
![Page 7: UNSW CLE 19 July 20011 Privacy and Law enforcement in the on-line world – the bigger picture. Nigel Waters Convenor, Australian Privacy Charter Council](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082518/5697c01a1a28abf838ccebdf/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
UNSW CLE 19 July 2001 7
Computer access warrants
• Introduced for ASIO
• Proposed extension to all investigatory agencies under Crimes & Customs Acts ? (Cybercrime Bill 2001)
• Major concerns about data integrity – question evidentiary value?
• Same issue in NZ
![Page 8: UNSW CLE 19 July 20011 Privacy and Law enforcement in the on-line world – the bigger picture. Nigel Waters Convenor, Australian Privacy Charter Council](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082518/5697c01a1a28abf838ccebdf/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
UNSW CLE 19 July 2001 8
Application of powers
• Specific investigations vs intelligence gathering - routine surveillance, matching
• Requirement to retain records
• Best protection is destruction
• Once available – pressure for access– Census– Proposed requirement on ISPs?
![Page 9: UNSW CLE 19 July 20011 Privacy and Law enforcement in the on-line world – the bigger picture. Nigel Waters Convenor, Australian Privacy Charter Council](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082518/5697c01a1a28abf838ccebdf/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
UNSW CLE 19 July 2001 9
Identification?
• Pressure to identify in more contexts
• Justification ? – ID fraud ?
• Often, real need is authentication
• PKI – muddled motives and application
• Privacy issues
• Privacy Commissioner Guidelines
![Page 10: UNSW CLE 19 July 20011 Privacy and Law enforcement in the on-line world – the bigger picture. Nigel Waters Convenor, Australian Privacy Charter Council](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082518/5697c01a1a28abf838ccebdf/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
UNSW CLE 19 July 2001 10
Data-matching
• Reversal of onus of proof
• AUSTRAC example– Subjective?– Disproportionate?
• Tendency for subjective norms to replace objective criteria
![Page 11: UNSW CLE 19 July 20011 Privacy and Law enforcement in the on-line world – the bigger picture. Nigel Waters Convenor, Australian Privacy Charter Council](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082518/5697c01a1a28abf838ccebdf/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
UNSW CLE 19 July 2001 11
Conclusion
• Common theme: Control vs freedom• How much risk to tolerate?• Difficult at individual program level
– will always favour greater control• Reject technological determinism• Fall back on basic principles• No Constitutional/BoR protection• Can only question each proposal