u.s.c. - minnesotamn.gov/commerce-stat/pdfs/superseding-indictment-schulz.pdf · u.s. v. angela...

12
CASE 0:16-cr-00341-MJD-FLN Document 195 Filed 08/15/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STA TES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Criminal File No. 16-341 (MJD/FLN) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ, YAHYE MOHAMED HERROW, TEMITA YO IFELOJU OLUSHOLDA DANIEL, a/k/a 'Vfayo," ABDISALAN ABDULAHAB HUSSEIN, and MUKHTAR YUSUF HASSAN, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) FIRST SUPERSEDING ) INDICTMENT ) ) 18 u.s.c. § 2 ) 18 u.s.c. § 1341 ) 18 u.s.c. § 1349 ) ) ) ) THE UNITED STATES GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT: INTRODUCTION 1. From at least in or about 2011 through in or about February 2016, Defendant ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ, a Doctor of Chiropractic, participated in a scheme with others to defraud automobile insurance companies by submitting claims and receiving reimbursements through her chiropractic clinics for chiropractic services that either were not medically necessary or were not rendered. The services prescribed and purportedly provided by SCHULZ and the chiropractors that she employed were not determined by medical necessity or the physical condition of each patient and were, instead, designed to fraudulently maximize reimbursement from the patients' automobile insurance companies. To induce patients to show up to chiropractic appointments for medically unnecessary ·, A.Ufj 1 5 20i7 y,S, Ol51PtlC1 COURT MPL ' :, -

Upload: others

Post on 15-Aug-2020

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: u.s.c. - Minnesotamn.gov/commerce-stat/pdfs/superseding-indictment-schulz.pdf · U.S. v. Angela April Schulz, et al. Criminal No. 16-341 (MJD/FLN) kickbacks to runners, including

CASE 0:16-cr-00341-MJD-FLN Document 195 Filed 08/15/17 Page 1 of 12

UNITED STA TES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Criminal File No. 16-341 (MJD/FLN)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ, YAHYE MOHAMED HERROW, TEMITA YO IFELOJU OLUSHOLDA DANIEL,

a/k/a 'Vfayo," ABDISALAN ABDULAHAB HUSSEIN, and MUKHTAR YUSUF HASSAN,

Defendants.

) ) ) ) ) FIRST SUPERSEDING ) INDICTMENT ) ) 18 u.s.c. § 2 ) 18 u.s.c. § 1341 ) 18 u.s.c. § 1349 ) ) ) )

THE UNITED STATES GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT:

INTRODUCTION

1. From at least in or about 2011 through in or about February 2016, Defendant

ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ, a Doctor of Chiropractic, participated in a scheme with

others to defraud automobile insurance companies by submitting claims and receiving

reimbursements through her chiropractic clinics for chiropractic services that either were

not medically necessary or were not rendered. The services prescribed and purportedly

provided by SCHULZ and the chiropractors that she employed were not determined by

medical necessity or the physical condition of each patient and were, instead, designed to

fraudulently maximize reimbursement from the patients' automobile insurance companies.

To induce patients to show up to chiropractic appointments for medically unnecessary

·,A.Ufj 1 5 20i7 y,S, Ol51PtlC1 COURT MPL

' :, -

Page 2: u.s.c. - Minnesotamn.gov/commerce-stat/pdfs/superseding-indictment-schulz.pdf · U.S. v. Angela April Schulz, et al. Criminal No. 16-341 (MJD/FLN) kickbacks to runners, including

CASE 0:16-cr-00341-MJD-FLN Document 195 Filed 08/15/17 Page 2 of 12

U.S. v. Angela April Schulz, et al. Criminal No. 16-341 {MJD/FLN)

typically paying each runner $1,000 to $2,500 per automobile accident patient, to bring

those patients to her clinics for services, often withholding those payments until the patients

had attended a minimum threshold number of treatment sessions. The runners, in turn,

induced patients into attending these unnecessary treatment sessions by paying illegal

kickbacks to the patients. SCHULZ then billed automobile insurance companies for these

fraudulent claims.

GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

At all times relevant to this indictment:

Relevant Entities and Individuals

2. A.A. Meyer Chiropractic, P.A. and Angela Morrow Rehabilitation, P.A.

were chiropractic and rehabilitation clinics located in Minneapolis, Minnesota, both of

which occupied the same office space (collectively, "Meyer Chiropractic").

3. Defendant ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ, f/k/a Angela Morrow, a resident

of Chaska, Minnesota, was a Doctor of Chiropractic, registered with State of Minnesota,

and was the chief executive officer of Meyer Chiropractic. SCHULZ submitted and

caused to be submitted to automobile insurance companies claims for chiropractic and

rehabilitation services that were not medically necessary and were not provided and made

and caused to be made illegal payments for the referral of patients to Meyer Chiropractic.

4. Unindicted Co-Conspirator #1 was a Doctor of Chiropractic, registered with

the State of Minnesota, who was employed at Meyer Chiropractic. Unindicted Co­

Conspirator #1 provided medically unnecessary services to patients at Meyer Chiropractic

2

Page 3: u.s.c. - Minnesotamn.gov/commerce-stat/pdfs/superseding-indictment-schulz.pdf · U.S. v. Angela April Schulz, et al. Criminal No. 16-341 (MJD/FLN) kickbacks to runners, including

CASE 0:16-cr-00341-MJD-FLN Document 195 Filed 08/15/17 Page 3 of 12

U.S. v. Angela April Schulz, et al. Criminal No. 16-341 {MJD/FLN)

and, at Schulz's direction, caused Meyer Chiropractic to file claims for services that were

not medically necessary and were not provided.

5. Unindicted Co-Conspirator #2 was a Doctor of Chiropractic, registered with

the State of Minnesota, who was employed at Meyer Chiropractic. Unindicted Co­

Conspirator #2 provided medically unnecessary services to patients at Meyer Chiropractic

and, at Schulz's direction, caused Meyer Chiropractic to file claims for services that were

not medically necessary and were not provided.

6. Defendant Y AHYE MOHAMED DERROW, a resident of Minneapolis,

Minnesota, was a runner employed by ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ and Meyer

Chiropractic. DERROW recruited automobile accident victims to show up for

appointments at Meyer Chiropractic, received illegal payments for recruiting these

patients, and made illegal payments to patients to induce them to continue receiving

medically unnecessary chiropractic services.

7. Defendant TEMITAYO IFELOJU OLUSHOLDA DANIEL, a/k/a

"Tayo," a resident of Minneapolis, Minnesota, was a runner employed by ANGELA

APRIL SCHULZ and Meyer Chiropractic. DANIEL recruited automobile accident

victims to show up for appointments at Meyer Chiropractic, received illegal payments for

recruiting these patients, and made illegal payments to patients to induce them to continue

receiving medically unnecessary chiropractic services.

8. Defendant ABDISALAN ABDULAHAB HUSSEIN, a resident of

Minneapolis, Minnesota, was a runner employed by ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ and

Meyer Chiropractic. HUSSEIN recruited automobile accident victims to show up for

3

Page 4: u.s.c. - Minnesotamn.gov/commerce-stat/pdfs/superseding-indictment-schulz.pdf · U.S. v. Angela April Schulz, et al. Criminal No. 16-341 (MJD/FLN) kickbacks to runners, including

CASE 0:16-cr-00341-MJD-FLN Document 195 Filed 08/15/17 Page 4 of 12

U.S. v. Angela April Schulz, et al. Criminal No. 16-341 (MJD/FLN)

appointments at Meyer Chiropractic, received illegal payments for recruiting these

patients, and made illegal payments to patients to induce them to continue receiving

medically unnecessary chiropractic services.

9. Defendant MUKHTAR YUSUF HASSAN, a resident of Minneapolis,

Minnesota, was a runner employed by ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ and Meyer

Chiropractic. HASSAN recruited automobile accident victims to show up for

appointments at Meyer Chiropractic, received illegal payments for recruiting these

patients, and made illegal payments to patients to induce them to continue receiving

medically unnecessary chiropractic services.

Minnesota's "No-Fault" Automobile Insurance

10. The Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act (the ''No-Fault Act"),

mandated that every vehicle registered in the State of Minnesota be covered by "no-fault"

automobile insurance. The No-Fault Act also required that automobile insurance carriers

( each being an "Insurer," or collectively the "Insurers") issue policies that comply with

various requirements, including providing minimum coverage of $20,000 in medical

expense benefits and $20,000 in income loss, replacement services loss, funeral expense

loss, survivor's economic loss, and survivor's replacement services loss benefits, to victims

of automobile accidents. The No-Fault Act required that Insurers provide this coverage

and pay these benefits regardless of which party is at fault for the automobile accident.

Among the medical expense benefits that an Insurer was required to reimburse were

chiropractic services.

4

Page 5: u.s.c. - Minnesotamn.gov/commerce-stat/pdfs/superseding-indictment-schulz.pdf · U.S. v. Angela April Schulz, et al. Criminal No. 16-341 (MJD/FLN) kickbacks to runners, including

CASE 0:16-cr-00341-MJD-FLN Document 195 Filed 08/15/17 Page 5 of 12

U.S. v. Angela April Schulz, et al. Criminal No. 16-341 (MJD/FLN)

11. The No-Fault Act prohibited health care providers, including chiropractors,

from initiating direct contact with any individual who suffered an injury as a result of an

automobile accident, specifying that the prohibited direct contact included contact by any

employee, agent, or third party acting on behalf of the health care provider, including

individuals referred to as "cappers," "runners," or "steerers." Minnesota laws also

expressly prohibited the employment of runners, cappers, or steerers (hereinafter, "runner"

or '"runners"), defining each such term to mean "a person who for a pecuniary gain directly

procures or solicits prospective patients through telephonic, electronic, or written

communication, or in-person contact, at the direction of, or in cooperation with, a health

care provider when the person knows or has reason to know that the provider's purpose is

to perform or obtain services or benefits under or relating to a contact of motor vehicle

insurance." Mn. Stat. § 609.612 Subd. l(c). Any claims for services rendered by a health

care provider that resulted from the use of a runner '4are noncompensable and

unenforceable as a matter oflaw." Id. Subd. 2.

The No-Fault Insurance Fraud Scheme

12. In order to take advantage of the provisions of the No-Fault Act that required

reimbursement of chiropractic services, ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ focused Meyer

Chiropractic's business on automobile accident victims and structured it in a way that

would maximize both the number of automobile accident patients seen at the clinic and the

number of visits and treatments that each patient would receive.

13. To increase the patient volume at Meyer Chiropractic, m violation of

Minnesota State Law, ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ paid and caused to be paid illegal

5

Page 6: u.s.c. - Minnesotamn.gov/commerce-stat/pdfs/superseding-indictment-schulz.pdf · U.S. v. Angela April Schulz, et al. Criminal No. 16-341 (MJD/FLN) kickbacks to runners, including

CASE 0:16-cr-00341-MJD-FLN Document 195 Filed 08/15/17 Page 6 of 12

U.S. v. Angela April Schulz, et al. Criminal No. 16-341 (MJD/FLN)

kickbacks to runners, including to YAHYE MOHAMED HERROW, TEMITAYO 1.0.

DANIEL, ABDISALAN ABDULAHAB HUSSEIN, and MUKHTAR YUSUF

HASSAN, in exchange for the referral of automobile accident victims to Meyer

Chiropractic. ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ generally paid the runners, including YAHYE

MOHAMED DERROW, TEMITAYO IFELOJU OLUSHOLDA DANIEL,

ABDISALAN ABDULAHAB HUSSEIN, and MUKHTAR YUSUF HASSAN a

kickback of between $500 and $2,500 per patient referral.

14. To ensure that she and Meyer Chiropractic would maximize profits when

billing the services to the Insurers, ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ withheld kickback

payments until after the referred patient had completed a minimum threshold number of

chiropractic appointments at Meyer Chiropractic, thus ensuring that Y AHYE

MOHAMED HERROW, TEMITAYO IFELOJU OLUSHOLDA DANIEL,

ABDISALAN ABDULAHAB HUSSEIN, MUKHTAR YUSUF HASSAN, and other

runners would require the automobile accident patients that they referred to return for

multiple visits.

15. To induce patients to go to Meyer Chiropractic for services and to continue

attending medically unnecessary sessions at Meyer Chiropractic, YAHYE MOHAMED

DERROW, TEMITAYO IFELOJU OLUSHOLDA DANIEL, ABDISALAN

ABDULAHAB HUSSEIN, MUKHTAR YUSUF HASSAN, and other runners paid cash

kickbacks directly to the patients. In some instances, the runners would pay individuals to

stage accidents and then go to Meyer Chiropractic for treatments, which were subsequently

billed to the automobile insurance companies.

6

Page 7: u.s.c. - Minnesotamn.gov/commerce-stat/pdfs/superseding-indictment-schulz.pdf · U.S. v. Angela April Schulz, et al. Criminal No. 16-341 (MJD/FLN) kickbacks to runners, including

CASE 0:16-cr-00341-MJD-FLN Document 195 Filed 08/15/17 Page 7 of 12

U.S. v. Angela April Schulz, et al. Criminal No. 16-341 (MJD/FLN)

16. To insulate herself from the illegal payments, ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ

did not typically pay YAHYE MOHAMED HERROW, TEMITAYO IFELOJU

OLUSBOLDA DANIEL, ABDISALAN ABDULABAB HUSSEIN, MUKHTAR

YUSUF HASSAN, and other runners directly and, instead, funneled the kickbacks through

SCHULZ's receptionist, Sammany R. Spangler. Spangler would routinely keep a portion

of the runners' payments for herself.

17. To conceal these illegal kickbacks further, ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ

began making these illegal kickback payments in cash, taking out substantial cash

withdrawals or writing large checks to "Cash" from various bank accounts traceable to

Meyer Chiropractic. During the period from 2012 through 2015, ANGELA APRIL

SCHULZ withdrew over $550,000 in cash from accounts traceable to Meyer Chiropractic

or to SCHULZ.

18. Regardless of the physical condition of each patient, ANGELA APRIL

SCHULZ, and her employees, Unindicted Co-Conspirator #1 and Unindicted Co­

Conspirator #2, operating at the direction of SCHULZ, prescribed a similar, and often

identical, protocol of treatment for each patient, seeking to maximize the number of visits

that each patient would make to Meyer Chiropractic, to exhaust the available No-Fault

benefits for each patient and to maximize reimbursement for SCHULZ and Meyer

Chiropractic. ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ directed Unindicted Co-Conspirator #1 and

Unindicted Co-Conspirator #2 to prescribe and to perform these services for each

automobile accident patient, without consideration of the medical necessity of these

treatments.

7

Page 8: u.s.c. - Minnesotamn.gov/commerce-stat/pdfs/superseding-indictment-schulz.pdf · U.S. v. Angela April Schulz, et al. Criminal No. 16-341 (MJD/FLN) kickbacks to runners, including

CASE 0:16-cr-00341-MJD-FLN Document 195 Filed 08/15/17 Page 8 of 12

U.S. v. Angela April Schulz, et al. Criminal No. 16-341 (MJD/FLN)

19. ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ directed Unindicted Co-Conspirator #1 and

Unindicted Co-Conspirator #2 to document on each patient's chart that they had provided

the services in the protocol treatment. On multiple occasions, if Unindicted Co­

Conspirator # 1 did not provide one of the services in the protocol treatment and,

accordingly, did not document that service on the patient's chart, SCHULZ directed

Unindicted Co-Conspirator # 1 to add notes to the chart to reflect that the service had been

provided, despite the fact that SCHULZ knew that Unindicted Co-Conspirator # 1 had not

provided the service.

20. ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ then submitted and caused to be submitted to

the Insurers claims for these services that were not medically necessary and, in other

instances, were not provided. In other instances, ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ submitted

and caused to be submitted to the Insurers claims for services on days when the patient for

whom the service was billed did not come to Meyer Chiropractic and did not receive any

medical treatment. With each such claim submission to the various Insurers, SCHULZ

and Meyer Chiropractic represented that the services for which reimbursement was being

sought were provided and were medically necessary.

21. ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ also submitted and caused to be submitted to

the Insurers claims for services that were provided as a result of kickback payments to

Y AHYE MOHAMED HERROW, TEMIT AYO IFELOJU OLUSHOLDA DANIEL,

ABDISALAN ABDULAHAB HUSSEIN, MUKHTAR YUSUF HASSAN, and other

runners and failed to disclose this material fact to the Insurers.

8

Page 9: u.s.c. - Minnesotamn.gov/commerce-stat/pdfs/superseding-indictment-schulz.pdf · U.S. v. Angela April Schulz, et al. Criminal No. 16-341 (MJD/FLN) kickbacks to runners, including

CASE 0:16-cr-00341-MJD-FLN Document 195 Filed 08/15/17 Page 9 of 12

U.S. v. Angela April Schulz. et al. Criminal No. 16-341 (MJD/FLN)

22. The Insurers paid millions of dollars to ANGELA APRil, SCHULZ and

Meyer Chiropractic as a result of these false and fraudulent claims submissions.

COUNTl (Conspiracy to Commit Mail Fraud)

23. The allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 22 of this Indictment are re-

alleged as if fully set forth herein.

24. From at least in or about 2011 and continuing through in or about February

2016, in the State and District of Minnesota and elsewhere, the defendants,

ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ, YAHYE MOHAMED HERROW,

TEMITAYO IFELOJU OLUSBOLDA DANIEL, a/k/a "TAYO", ABDISALAN ABDULAHAB HUSSEIN, and

MUKHTAR YUSUF HASSAN,

did knowingly and willfully conspire, combine, and agree with each other and with other

persons known and unknown to the Grand Jury, including Unindicted Co-Conspirator #1

and Unindicted Co-Conspirator #2, to commit mail fraud, in violation of Title 18, United

States Code, Section 1341.

All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349.

COUNTS2-17 (Mail Fraud)

25. The allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 22 of this Indictment are

realleged as if fully set forth herein.

26. From at least in or about 2011 and continuing through in or about February

2016, in the State and District of Minnesota and elsewhere, the defendants, and others

known and unknown to the grand jury, having devised and intending to devise the scheme

9

Page 10: u.s.c. - Minnesotamn.gov/commerce-stat/pdfs/superseding-indictment-schulz.pdf · U.S. v. Angela April Schulz, et al. Criminal No. 16-341 (MJD/FLN) kickbacks to runners, including

CASE 0:16-cr-00341-MJD-FLN Document 195 Filed 08/15/17 Page 10 of 12

U.S. v. Angela April Schulz, et al. Criminal No. 16-341 (MJD/FLN)

and artifice described above, caused to be sent, delivered, and moved by the United States

Postal Service and private and commercial interstate carrier various mailings, items, and

things for the purpose of executing and attempting to execute such scheme and artifice:

COUNT APPROX. DEFENDANTS MAILING DETAILS DATE

2 10/20/2014 ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ, Mailing of claims for YAHYE MOHAMED HERROW patient M.B. to

Travelers Ins. Co. 3 11/3/2014 ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ, Mailing of check for

YAHYE MOHAMED DERROW services for patient M.B. from Travelers to MeyerChiro.

4 11/18/2014 ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ, Mailing of claims for Y AHYE MOHAMED DERROW patient B.O. to

Travelers Ins. Co. 5 2/20/2015 ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ, Mailing of check for

YAHYE MOHA:MED HERROW services for patient B.O. from Travelers to Meyer Chiro.

6 11/11/2013 ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ, Mailing of claims for TEMITAYOIFELOJU patient S.B. to OLUSHOLDA DANIEL Progressive Ins. Co.

7 11/15/2013 ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ, Mailing of check for TEMITAYO IFELOJU services for patient S.B. OLUSHOLDA DANIEL from Progressive to

Meyer Chiro. 8 11/16/2013 ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ, Mailing of claims for

TEMITAYO IFELOJU patient M.S. to OLUSHOLDA DANIEL Progressive Ins. Co.

9 12/2/2014 ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ, Mailing of check for TEMITAYO IFELOJU services for patient M.S. OLUSHOLDA DANIEL from Progressive to

attorney for M.S. including payment for services provided by MeyerChiro.

10 10/26/2015 ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ, Mailing of claims for ABDISALAN ABDULAHAB patient M.F. to HUSSEIN Travelers Ins. Co.

10

Page 11: u.s.c. - Minnesotamn.gov/commerce-stat/pdfs/superseding-indictment-schulz.pdf · U.S. v. Angela April Schulz, et al. Criminal No. 16-341 (MJD/FLN) kickbacks to runners, including

CASE 0:16-cr-00341-MJD-FLN Document 195 Filed 08/15/17 Page 11 of 12

U.S. v. Angela April Schulz, et al. Criminal No. 16-341 {MJD/FLN)

11 11/17/2015 ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ, Mailing of check for ABDISALAN ABDULAHAB services for patient M.F. HUSSEIN from Travelers to Meyer

Chiro. 12 12/14/2015 ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ, Mailing of claims for

ABDISALAN ABDULAHAB patient F .A. to HUSSEIN Progressive Ins. Co.

13 12/22/2015 ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ, Mailing of check for ABDISALAN ABDULAHAB services for patient F .A. HUSSEIN from Progressive to

Meyer Chiro. 14 12/29/2015 ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ, Mailing of claims for

MUKHTAR YUSUF HASSAN patient A.O. to Liberty Mutual

15 12/29/2015 ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ, Mailing of claims for MUKHTAR YUSUF HASSAN patient H.M. to Liberty

Mutual 16 7/1/2015 ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ, Mailing of claims for

MUKHTAR YUSUF HASSAN patient H.O. to Farmers Ins. Co.

17 2/18/2016 ANGELA APRIL SCHULZ, Mailing of check for MUKHTAR YUSUF HASSAN services for patient H.O

from Farmers to attorney for H.O. for claim from Meyer Chiro.

All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1341 and 2.

FORFEITURE ALLEGATIONS

27. Counts 1-17 of this Indictment are hereby realleged and incorporated as if

fully set forth herein by reference, for the purpose of alleging forfeiture pursuant to

Title 18, United States Code, Sections 981(a)(l)(C) and 982(a)(7), and Title 28, United

States Code, Section 2461 ( c ),

28. Upon conviction of the offenses alleged in Counts 1-17 of this Indictment,

the defendants shall forfeit to the United States pursuant to Title 18, United States Code,

11

Page 12: u.s.c. - Minnesotamn.gov/commerce-stat/pdfs/superseding-indictment-schulz.pdf · U.S. v. Angela April Schulz, et al. Criminal No. 16-341 (MJD/FLN) kickbacks to runners, including

CASE 0:16-cr-00341-MJD-FLN Document 195 Filed 08/15/17 Page 12 of 12

U.S. v. Angela April Schulz. et al. Criminal No. 16-341 (MJD/FLN)

Section 982(a)(7) and Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(l)(C), in conjunction

with Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), all property, real or personal, that

constitutes or is derived, directly or indirectly, from gross proceeds traceable to the

commission of the offenses charged in Counts 1-17, respectively.

29. If any of the above-described forfeitable property is unavailable for

forfeiture, the United States intends to seek the forfeiture of substitute property as provided

for in Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), as incorporated by Title 18, United

States Code, Section 982(b)(l) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c).

A TRUE BILL

ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOREPERSON

12