using several ontologies for describing audio-visual documents: a case study in the medical domain
DESCRIPTION
Using Several Ontologies for Describing Audio-Visual Documents: A Case Study in the Medical Domain. Sunday 29 th of May, 2005. Antoine Isaac 1 & Raphaël Troncy 2. Multimedia and the Semantic Web. Agenda. Context and Aims Corpus Ontological Resources AV Ontology, Medical Ontology - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Using Several Ontologies for Describing Audio-
Visual Documents:A Case Study in the Medical
Domain
Sunday 29th of May, 2005
Antoine Isaac1 & Raphaël Troncy2
Multimedia and the Semantic Web
2005/05/29 A. Isaac & R. Troncy - MSW'2005 2
Agenda
• Context and Aims• Corpus• Ontological Resources
– AV Ontology, Medical Ontology
• Annotating the Videos• Querying and Reasoning• Performing SW-inspired Reasoning• Conclusion
2005/05/29 A. Isaac & R. Troncy - MSW'2005 3
Describe AV documents
• Various uses / Different granularities– Identification, feature extraction, structural decomposition,
semantic description
• Description deep meaning cannot be accessed and processed by classical systems– Knowledge is often implicit: labels and comments in natural
language– Formalisation for description syntax, not semantics
• Formal semantics should be interesting– Reasoning with AV document descriptions– Interoperability with formal domain-specific ontologies, allowing
to mix AV and domain-related reasoning
2005/05/29 A. Isaac & R. Troncy - MSW'2005 4
Objectives
• Settle an mini-experiment to show the benefits of using semantic web technologies for annotating audiovisual content
• Show that the use of:– formal ontologies,– annotation pattern,– inference capabilities
… is highly desirable for a better access to AV content
2005/05/29 A. Isaac & R. Troncy - MSW'2005 5
Corpus
• Medicine-related TV documentaries– 30 documents, about 30 hours– 50% deal with heart (surgery) theme
• Description point of view: how AV features are used to popularize scientific notions
• Describe both the form and the content– AV-oriented parts (documentary structure)– Theme-oriented parts (medicine notions)
2005/05/29 A. Isaac & R. Troncy - MSW'2005 6
Ontological Resources
• Audio-Visual Core Ontology [Isaac & Troncy, 2004]
– Characterization of programs and sequences (AV genre)– Decomposition of programs and sequences– Ability to introduce description from the point of view of the
activities that constitute the context of AV documents• roles of people involved, way production and broadcast are
achieved, etc.
• Dual Legitimacy– Use: conceptualization grounded on observed purposes and
domain initiatives, study of 30 years of documentary practices– Conception: articulation with an upper-level ontology: DOLCE
[Gangemi, 2002]
2005/05/29 A. Isaac & R. Troncy - MSW'2005 7
Ontological Resources
<owl:Class rdf:ID="DialogSequence"> <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="#SpokenSequence"/> <rdfs:subClassOf> <owl:Restriction> <owl:onProperty> <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="#hasParticipant"/> </owl:onProperty> <owl:minCardinality rdf:datatype="&xsd;int">2</owl:minCardinality> </owl:Restriction> </rdfs:subClassOf> </owl:Class>
2005/05/29 A. Isaac & R. Troncy - MSW'2005 8
Ontological Resources
• Extension of AV core with specific application notions– Exemplification, demonstration, etc.
• Re-use of Medical Ontologies– Menelas: domain of coronary pathologies
• Concepts dealing with heart surgery
– Alternative choices are possible• Galen (concepts dealing with surgical procedures)
• Articulation between the ontologies– No use of automatic alignment methods or tools– State by hand OWL axioms (equivalentClass)
2005/05/29 A. Isaac & R. Troncy - MSW'2005 9
Description Process
• Segmentation of the AV material– Selection of relevant documentary items
• Knowledge-based AV annotation– Documentary structure characterization– Segment content description
2005/05/29 A. Isaac & R. Troncy - MSW'2005 10
Segmenting the Videos
2005/05/29 A. Isaac & R. Troncy - MSW'2005 11
Describing the Videos
• Documentary patterns– Layered approach [Troncy, 2003]
– AV description language [Troncy & Carrive, 2004]
• Knowledge-based Annotation Process– The structure is described at the knowledge
level• Concepts and relations from the AV ontology are
manually introduced in the description
– Content description• Link to external world themes and entities
2005/05/29 A. Isaac & R. Troncy - MSW'2005 12
Describing the Videos
• Relational Indexing Pattern– Help for user: specify how concepts and relations
have to be used (annotation ‘design pattern’)– Important for ontology conception and use (with
reasoning knowledge)
• Simple pattern that can lead to complex descriptions– Recursive relational structure
2005/05/29 A. Isaac & R. Troncy - MSW'2005 13
Describing the Videos
2005/05/29 A. Isaac & R. Troncy - MSW'2005 14
Querying and Reasoning
• Example:« retrieve the programs that explain a disease and
show one of its causes »
• Need for the following inferences:– Subsumption
– Composition
Disease(x)x)CVDisease(
z),explains(x z),explains(yy)ence(x,hasSubSequ z)shows(x, z)shows(y, y)ence(x,hasSubSequ
2005/05/29 A. Isaac & R. Troncy - MSW'2005 15
Querying and Reasoning
explains
CVDisease:blueDisease
hasSubSequence
ExpertInterview:cvDiseasesItw
causes
Drawing:stenosisDrwg
hasEditingInsert
hasParticipant
Person: prof1
Program:JN_children
represents
stateOf
Heart: heart1
PulmonaryArtery: pa
part
roleExpertRole:prof1Role
explains
Stenosis:paStenosis
represents
Animated:animatedValue
hasAVFeature
expl
ains
representshasAVFeature
Explicit statementsInferred statements
2005/05/29 A. Isaac & R. Troncy - MSW'2005 16
Performing reasoning
• A layered complexity approach– RDFS: subsumption– OWL(DL): complex definitions + algebraic properties– Rules: horn clauses
• Concrete implementation– RDFS: Sesame Architecture [Broekstra, 2002]
– OWL DL: BOR Reasoner [Simov, 2002] – OWL-DLP [Grosof, 2003] + Rules : Sesame custom
inference module
2005/05/29 A. Isaac & R. Troncy - MSW'2005 17
Examples
• DL definitions
• (Composition) rule
),(),(),( zxrepresentszyrepresentsyxencehasSubSequ
))(
)((
))(
(
nRoleInstitutio
leHospitalRoalRoleProfessionleAcademicRoExpertRole
ExpertRolerolesomePersonpanthasParticisome
InterviewrviewExpertInte
2005/05/29 A. Isaac & R. Troncy - MSW'2005 18
Summary
Explicit triples
Inferred triples
All triples
RDF Model 129
AV Ontology 5231 10810 16041
Menelas Ontology
10534 26637 37171
Instances 276 1507 1783
Total 16041 38954 54995
2005/05/29 A. Isaac & R. Troncy - MSW'2005 19
Conclusion
• This experimentation:– Uses Semantic Web languages and tools for describing AV
contents– Uses different ontologies to capture the structure and the
content of the documents– Uses relational indexing pattern for the annotation
• Future work: thorough evaluation of those techniques involving real users
• A problem that cannot be generally solved: fixing a trade-off between expressivity and tractable computation– Ad hoc, according to the needs of the application targeted