·uu results: course level fall 2009 - kerry s kleyman...

52
·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes 3. Explained course requirements and evaluation crit$ria 4. Presented material in an organized manner 5. Made good use of community resources 6. Spoke clearly and audibly 7. Encouraged questions and treated them respectfujlly 8. Created a classroom environment conducive to le; 9. Kept discussion on track 10. Was prepared for sessions with students 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter PSYC 336-01 (000818) Kerry Kleyman Fall 2009 FY20103 Response Options #of Responses %of Resps Cum% for Item Always Usually Sometimes Always Usually Sometimes Seldom Always Usually Sometimes Always Usually Sometimes Seldom Always Usually Sometimes Seldom N/A Always Usually Sometimes Always Usually Always Usually Sometimes Always Usually Sometimes Always Usually Sometimes Always Usually Sometimes 14 8 2 13 8 2 1 12 7 4 16 4 3 1 12 7 2 2 1 19 4 1 21 3 19 3 2 12 58.33% 33.33% 58.33% 91.67% 8.33% 100.00% 54.17% 54.17% 33.33% 87.50% 8.33% 95.83% 4.17% 100.00% 52.17% 52.17% 30.43% 82.61% 17.39% 100.00% 66.67% 66.67% 16.67% 83.33% 12.50% 95.83% 4.17% 100.00% 50.00% 50.00% 29.17% 79.17% 8.33% 87.50% 8.33% 95.83% 4.17% 100.00% 79.17% 79.17% 16.67% 95.83% 4.17% 100.00% 87 .50% 87.50% 12.50% 100.00% 79.17% 79.17% 12.50% 91.67% 8.33% 100.00% 50.00% 50.00% 10 41.67% 91.67% 2 17 5 2 8.33% 100.00% 70.83% 70.83% 20.83% 91.67% 8.33% 100.00% 16 66.67% 66.67% 7 29.17% 95.83% 1 4.17% 100.00% 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to age, gende , ethnicity, religion, Always 21 87.50% 87.50% disabilities, and sexual preference Usually 3 12.50% 100.00% Office of Institutional Research 8:37:47 AM Page 183

Upload: others

Post on 13-Mar-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies

# ltemText

1. Stimulated student thinking

2. Explained course objectives & outcomes

3. Explained course requirements and evaluation crit$ria

4. Presented material in an organized manner

5. Made good use of community resources

6. Spoke clearly and audibly

7. Encouraged questions and treated them respectfujlly

8. Created a classroom environment conducive to le; rnin~

9. Kept discussion on track

10. Was prepared for sessions with students

11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter

PSYC 336-01 (000818)

Kerry Kleyman

Fall 2009 FY20103

Response Options #of

Responses %of Resps

Cum% for Item

Always

Usually

Sometimes

Always

Usually

Sometimes

Seldom

Always

Usually

Sometimes

Always

Usually

Sometimes

Seldom

Always

Usually

Sometimes

Seldom

N/A

Always

Usually

Sometimes

Always

Usually

Always

Usually

Sometimes

Always

Usually

Sometimes

Always

Usually

Sometimes

Always

Usually

Sometimes

14

8

2

13

8

2

1

12

7

4

16

4

3

1

12

7

2

2

1

19

4

1

21

3

19

3

2

12

58.33%

33.33%

58.33%

91.67%

8.33% 100.00%

54.17% 54.17%

33.33% 87.50%

8.33% 95.83%

4.17% 100.00%

52.17% 52.17%

30.43% 82.61%

17.39% 100.00%

66.67% 66.67%

16.67% 83.33%

12.50% 95.83%

4.17% 100.00%

50.00% 50.00%

29.17% 79.17%

8.33% 87.50%

8.33% 95.83%

4.17% 100.00%

79.17% 79.17%

16.67% 95.83%

4.17% 100.00%

87 .50% 87.50%

12.50% 100.00%

79.17% 79.17%

12.50% 91.67%

8.33% 100.00%

50.00% 50.00%

10 41.67% 91.67%

2

17

5

2

8.33% 100.00%

70.83% 70.83%

20.83% 91.67%

8.33% 100.00%

16 66.67% 66.67%

7 29.17% 95.83%

1 4.17% 100.00%

12. Was fair and respectful with regard to age, gende , rac~, ethnicity, religion, Always 21 87.50% 87.50% disabilities, and sexual preference

Usually 3 12.50% 100.00%

Office of Institutional Research 1/21~2010 8:37:47 AM Page 183

Page 2: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies

# ltemText

13. Defined assignments clearly and carefully

14. Provided helpful written responses on student's work

15. Informed students of their progress in time to correct deficiencies

16. Facilitated students' active involvement in learning

17. Designed assignments and tests to increase understanding and application

18. Held class as scheduled

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?

20. How much have you learned in this course?

PSYC 336-01 (000818)

Kerry Kleyman

Fall 2009 FY20103

#of Response Options Responses

Always 11

Usually 5

Sometimes 5

Seldom 3

Always 17

Usually 3

Sometimes 4

Always 13

Usually 7

Sometimes 1

Seldom 2

Always 13

Usually 8

Sometimes 1

Seldom 1

Always 15

Usually 7

Sometimes 1

Seldom 1

Always 24

Excellent 13

Very Good 9

Good 1

Poor 1

Exceptional Amount 4

Very Much 16

Much 2

Some 1

Little 1

Yes 24

%of Cum% Resps for Item

45.83% 45.83%

20.83% 66.67%

20.83% 87.50%

12.50% 100.00%

70.83% 70.83%

12.50% 83.33%

16.67% 100.00%

56.52% 56.52%

30.43% 86.96%

4.35% 91.30%

8.70% 100.00%

56.52% 56.52%

34.78% 91.30%

4.35% 95.65%

4.35% 100.00%

62.50% 62.50%

29.17% 91.67%

4.17% 95.83%

4.17% 100.00%

100.00% 100.00%

54.17% 54.17%

37.50% 91.67%

4.17% 95.83%

4.17% 100.00%

16.67% 16.67%

66.67% 83.33%

8.33% 91.67%

4.17% 95.83%

4.17% 100.00%

100.00% 100.00% 21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

22. How important was class attendance to understanding the subject? Very 13 54.17% 54.17%

Somewhat 7 29.17% 83.33%

Not Very 4 16.67% 100.00%

23. How many hours per week did you typically spend preparing for class? 3 or less 4 16.67% 16.67%

4 to 6 17 70.83% 87.50%

11to15 3 12.50% 100.00%

24. How would you rate the quality of the classroom space? Very Good 10 41.67% 41.67%

Good 11 45.83% 87.50%

Satisfactory 3 12.50% 100.00%

Office of Institutional Research 1/21/2010 8:37:47 AM Page 184

Page 3: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

liQ Re.suits: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies

PSYC 336-01 (000818)

Kerry Kleyman

Fall 2009 FY20103

# ltemText Response Options #of

Responses

Statistics # Item Text 1. Stimulated student thinking

2. Explained course objectives & outcomes

3. Explained course requirements and evaluatio~ criteria

4. Presented material in an organized manner

5. Made good use of community resources

6. Spoke clearly and audibly

7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp~ctful y

8. Created a classroom environment conducive o lea ning

9. Kept discussion on track

10. Was prepared for sessions with students

11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter

12. Was fair and respectful with regard to age, g~nder race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, and sexual preference

13. Defined assignments clearly and carefully

14. Provided helpful written responses on studer t's wprk

15. Informed students of their progress in time tc corrf:!ct deficiencies

16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le~ rni~

17. Designed assignments and tests to increase ynderstanding and application

18. Held class as scheduled

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?

20. How much have you learned in this course?

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting?

22. How important was class attendance to und~ rstaf'lding the subject?

23. How many hours per week did you typically pend preparing for class?

24. How would you rate the quality of the classr porn space?

Enc of results for Course ID 000818

Office of Institutional Research 1/2112010 8:37:47 AM

Valid Mean SD 24 1.50 0.66

24 1.63 0.82

23 1.65 0.78

24 1.54 0.88

23 1.74 0.96

24 1.25 0.53

24 1.13 0.34

24 1.29 0.62

24 1.58 0.65

24 1.38 0.65

24 1.38 0.58

24 1.13 0.34

24 2.00 1.10

24 1.46 0.78

23 1.65 0.93

23 1.57 0.79

24 1.50 0.78

24 1.00 0.00

24 1.58 0.78

24 2.13 0.90

24 1.00 0.00

24 1.63 0.77

24 2.08 0.83

24 1.71 0.69

%of Cum% Resps for Item

Page 185

Page 4: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies

# ltemText

Office of Institutional Research 1/21/2010 8:37:47 AM

PSVC 336-01 {000818)

Kerry Kleyman

Fall 2009 FV20103

Response Options #of

Responses %of Cum% Resps for Item

Page 186

Page 5: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Metropol.it~ II Inst uc ional Improvement Questionnaire State Uruversrty riumrrn

Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an ny ous.

Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School

---------2 0 1 0 r3J CD First College -• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

® • ® • @ Arts & Sciences -• Fill response ovals completely - do

not use V's or Xs to mark choices. CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management -

• @ @ @ O Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. ® ® ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -

© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® SP

• ® ® ® ® (J) (J) (J) (J)

® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®

Not Applicable Never

Sometimes

The Instructor: • .l:[~t1.al1y. Always :> .·

..................................... ~ .. -.-.. -.-.. -.-.. -.-.. ~. ob•oo 0 1. Stimulated student thinking. 2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ...................................... e O O 0 0 O 3. Explained course requirements and ev luati n criteria. . ............................. O O O Q 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. ...................................... 000000 5. Made good use of community resource . . ........................................ 0 d 0 ~ 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly ...................................................... oO•doo 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully ................................ o•oooo 8. Created a classroom environment conduciv to learning ............................. 000000 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... 0 ··· 0 O 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ...................................... 0 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ 0 ti 0 d 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities,

and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................ . 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefully. . ....................................... 0 C) 0 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on ude ts' work ................................ 00 000 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e t correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O e O O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming .................................. OOOeOO 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. 000 00 18. Held class as scheduled. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 O d 0 0

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?

O Excellent OVery Good •Good OPoor O Very Poor

20 How much have you learned in this course? O Exceptional Amount O Very Much OMuch •Some O Little

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? OYes ONo

--------------.; -:. -----· ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week

did you typically spend preparing for class?

24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?

OVery 0 Somewhat •Not Very 0 Not at All

• 3 or Less O 11 to 15 O 4 to 6 O 16 or More 07to10

of the classroom space? O Very Good •Good O Satisfactory O Unacceptable

---

Page 6: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Please write comments in the boxes below.

A. What did you like about the course/instructor?

J_ e '2)0Lte~ V\.9_.;lr Tr>eX-S: d'v\61 \ \ \-q OV\ eJ2.., .;'..? \'\J__. \oR_ CCVVv~. <2..~J\r-\-l' ...... b t-e. '

B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?

~ ~ e,.S.S<gn 'N\.e.,\'\-\& d U{'\ Y\~ 6YU. ~-~ .\e.r, b'IL\YI ~ \ \. ~ ~-Y\.,~ ~-~ -\~.

Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.

Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.

Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Page 7: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Metropolitan lfll Inst ucl ional Improvement Questionnaire State Uruvers1ty [[lcmm1

---Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer

---questions on both sides. All responses are an n --Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School -• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

• Fill response ovals completely - do not use V's or Xs to mark choices.

• Answer questions on both sides.

The Instructor:

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?

O Excellent •veryGood OGood O Poor O Very Poor

22. How important was class attendance for understanding the subject?

OVery e Somewhat O Not Very 0 Not at All

2 ® CD

• ® © ® ® CJ)

® ®

20 How much have you learned in this course? O Exceptional Amount every Much O Much OSome O Little

0

• CD @

® © ® ® CJ)

® ®

23 How many hours per week did you typically spend preparing for class?

1 ®

• @

® © ® ® CJ)

® ®

• 3 or Less O 11 to 15

0

• CD @

® © ® ® CJ)

® ®

O 4 to 6 O 16 or More 0 7 to 10

'Q CD First College -@ Arts & Sciences -CD SU ® Management -e Prof. Studies -• FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® SP ------Not Applicable -

Never -.-----'~~---,----,..,----,,

Seldom -.---~~-~~-----'--,.

Sometimes

UsiI~llf

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? •Yes ONo

------: -.----· -· ---------------------24. How would you rate the quality -

of the classroom space? •veryGood OGood 0 Satisfactory O Unacceptable

---

Page 8: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Please write comments in the boxes below.

A. What did you like about the course/instructor?

-f vt/\"1, kff tw 111-/ffesf(d 111

lh#:letio.1 .

B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?

WJ.

Thank you.for taking the time to answer these questions.

Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.

Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Page 9: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Metropol~t~ II Inst uc ional Improvement Questionnaire State Uruvers1ty (irmmu ---Metropolitan State University would like in onn tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be

used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer ---questions on both sides. All responses are an n

• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

• Fill response ovals completely - do not use V's or Xs to mark choices.

• Answer questions on both sides.

--Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School -2 0 1 0 3 CD First College -® • ® • @ Arts & Sciences -CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management -

• ® ® ® • Prof. Studies -® ® ® ® I~ FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® SP -® ® ® ® -(}) (}) (}) (}) -® ® ® ® -® ® ® ® --Not Applicable -

Never -...-.-'~~~ .. -,:,,-_,s~,e~1d-Om-... ~'.~ ..

Sometimes --The Instructor: Always -c 1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... • O O O 0 0 2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ...................................... e O O O O O 3. Explained course requirements and ev luati n criteria. . ............................. • Q 0 Q 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. ...................................... !f Q 0 Q 0 0 5. Made good use of community resource . . ........................................ 0 Q 0 O 0 • 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... <9 0 0 b 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully ................................ •OOOOO 8. Created a classroom environment conduciv to learning ............................. <f QOOOO 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... <e 0 0 Q 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with stud en s. . ...................................... • Q 0 Q 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ • Q 0 Q 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, . . .·· ..

and sexual orientation ....................................................... eoopoo 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefully ......................................... <800000 14. Provided helpful written responses on ude ts' work ................................ •OOOOO 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e t correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 O O O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . () 0 6 0 O 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. <1100000 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... @JQOQOO

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?

@Excellent O Very Good OGood 0 Poor O Very Poor

20 How much have you learned in this course? O Exceptional Amount •Very Much OMuch OSome O Little

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? eves ONo

-: _; .. .•

-~· -~ .. ,: ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week

did you typically spend preparing for class?

24. How would you rate the quality -

for understanding the subject? fi Very 0 Somewhat O Not Very O Not at All

O 3 or Less O 11 to 15 • 4 to 6 O 16 or More 07to10

of the classroom space? •Very Good OGood O Satisfactory O Unacceptable

---

Page 10: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Please write comments in the boxes below.

A. What did you like about the course/instructor?

I' n ·te_es+t /1'5' ho__d CiL-t'

~/) +o l,~si-<2._c-J

B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?

Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.

Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.

Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Page 11: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Metropolitan Ill Inst Lclional Improvement Questionnaire State Umvers1ty rrmmrn

Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urric lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an n

Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School

---------• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

2 0 1 0 r :;i CD First College -

® • ® • @ Arts & Sciences -• Fill response ovals completely - do

not use vs or Xs to mark choices. CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management -

• @ @ @ • Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. ® ® ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -

® ® ® ® ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® (J) (J) (J) (J)

® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®

The Instructor:

® SP

Not Applicable Never

Seldom Sometimes

··• .· l,J"su11Iiy. Always · ....

1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... @ Q O () O 0 2. Explained course objectives and outco~ es. . ......................................• Q 0 () 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and ev luati n criteria. . ............................. • Q 0 Q 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized majner. ...................................... *OOQOO 5. Made good use of community resource . . . . ..................................... • Q 0 Q 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... 0 Q 0 Q 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated the I' res ectfully. . .............................. • O 0 Q 0 0 8. Created a classroom environment condltciv to learning. . ........................... • O 0 Q 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track .................................................... eOOOOO

10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s ........................................ 9>QOOOO 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ • 0 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities,

and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... • 0 O 0 O 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly. . ....................................... • O 0 0 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work. . .............................. • Q 0 0 0 0 15. Informed students of their progress in ti et correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . lO 6 O () O 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming. . ................................ • Q 0 0 0 0 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. ie60QOO 18. Held class as scheduled. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?

• Excellent OVery Good OGood 0 Poor 0 Very Poor

20 How much have you learned in this course? 0 Exceptional Amount 9 Very Much OMuch OSome 0 Little

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? eves ONo

------------.: -·~ -·----t -;: -· -· ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week

did you typically spend preparing for class?

24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?

every O Somewhat O Not Very 0 Not at All

0 3 or Less 0 11 to 15 • 4 to 6 0 16 or More 0 7 to 10

of the classroom space? -t9 Very Good -OGood -0 Satisfactory ~ -0 Unacceptable ~R -

Page 12: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Please write comments in the boxes below.

A. What did you like about the course/instructor?

B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?

Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.

Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.

Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Page 13: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Metropolitan 111 Inst le ional Improvement Questionnaire State University ~

Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an n

Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School

---------• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

2 0 1 0 3 CD First College -® • ® • @ Arts & Sciences -

• Fill response ovals completely - do not use V's or Xs to mark choices.

CD CD • CD CD SU @ Management -

• @ @ @ • Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. @ @ @ @ • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -

© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® SP

-

® ® ® ® CV CV CV CV ® ® ® ® CV CV CV CV

l Not Applicable

l l J i_-:: 2-• Seld:~ver

Sometimes

. L ~ {Jsually : I

l Always C ,•: The Instructor:

1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... 8 O O O O O 2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ...................................... O O O () O O 3. Explained course requirements and evailuati n criteria. . ............................. O Q 0 Q 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized maj1rlmer. ...................................... <DO Op 0 0 5. Made good use of community resource . . ........................................ 0 Q 0 Q 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and .audibly. . .................................................... ~ O O 0 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res· ectfully ................................ 900000 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ to learning. . ........................... t& Q 0 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... • 0 0 0 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ...................................... ~ 0 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, .. ·.. ,-.·.

and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... • Q 0 0 0 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly. . ....................................... ID O 0 () 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work. . .............................. • O 0 O 0 0 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e t correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ O O d O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming. . ................................ ~ () O O O O 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. f!>OOOOO 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... ~00000

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?

•Excellent OVeryGood OGood 0 Poor O Very Poor

20 How much have you learned in this course? O Exceptional Amount (jj Very Much 0 Much OSome 0 Little

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? Cl Yes ONo

-----------_ .. __ , ----. ------· ----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week

did you typically spend preparing for class?

24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject? •very 0 Somewhat O Not Very O Not at All

0 3 or Less 0 11 to 15 9 4 to 6 0 16 or More 0 7 to 10

of the classroom space? •veryGood OGood 0 Satisfactory 0 Unacceptable

---

Page 14: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Please write comments in the boxes below.

A. What did you like about the course/instructor?

u~'f r fllhePJ~

'j oJJ I !Ii f1f!0~

B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?

Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.

Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.

Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Page 15: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Metropol_it~ 0 Inst uc ional Improvement Questionnaire State Uruvers1ty !icmm[J

Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an ny ous.

• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

• Fill response ovals completely - do not use V's or Xs to mark choices.

• Answer questions on both sides.

-Fiscal Year/Tr _?_ laJ L1.. £l la_ -1~ ·~ 1= V' 112 ® • ® • CD CD • CD CD SU

• CD CD CD ® ® ® ® • FA © © © © ® ® ® ® ® SP ® ® ® ® (j) (j) (j) (j)

® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®

Course College/ School

CD First College CD Arts & Sciences ® Management e. Prof. Studies ® Nursing & Hlth_ Sci. ® Law Enf./Crim. Just.

---------------------Not Applicable -

Never -;--'~---,-,.----,----,

·.>.Seldom -.-----''-"---~---'-~--.

Sometimes

The Instructor:

1. Stimulated student thinking. 2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ..................................... . 3. Explained course requirements and ev luati n criteria. . _ ... __ ... _ ... _ ... __ ... _ ...... O O O 6 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. ......... _ ....... _ ... - ........ _ ... - ... • Q O Q 0 0 5. Made good use of community resource . . ................................... , .... • () 0 () 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .......................... _ ......................... ~ 6 O 6 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully ..... _.......................... (JOQOO 8. Created a classroom environment conduciv to learning .......... _ ... _ ........ _ ..... ~()0000 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... - ................ - .......... ~ 0 0 Q 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ............ - ......................... • 0 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ '8 0 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, · . ·

and sexual orientation ..... - ................................. - .............. eooooo 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefully ...................... _ ........ _ ......... 4tOO()OO 14. Provided helpful written responses on ude ts' work ................................ ~OOQOO 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e t correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ O O O O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le rning ............... _ .................. ~00000 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. @00000 18. Held class as scheduled. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . QO()OO

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?

@Excellent O Very Good OGood OPoor 0 Very Poor

20 How much have you learned in this course? G Exceptional Amount O Very Much OMuch osome O Little

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? ~Yes

ONo

----,_ -, -( --( -(

-L -1:

( ----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week did you typically spend preparing for class?

24. How would you rate the quality -

for understanding the subject? OVery O Somewhat <IP Not Very 0 Not at All

~ 3 or Less O 11 to 15 O 4 to 6 O 16 or More O 7 to 10

of the classroom space? O Very Good OGood O Satisfactory O Unacceptable

---

Page 16: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Please write comments in the boxes below.

A. What did you like about the course/instructor?

B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?

Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.

Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.

Printed in USA • OMR. Survey Systems • www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Page 17: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Metropolitan ~ I Inst uc ional Improvement Questionnaire State University - ---Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be

used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer ---questions on both sides. All responses are an n

• Please use pencil or blue/black ink. • Fill response ovals completely - do

not use ti's or Xs to mark choices.

• Answer questions on both sides.

Fiscal Year/Tr

2 0 1 0 r~ @ • @ • CD CD • CD CD SU

• ® ® ® ® ® ® ® • FA @ @ @ @

® ® ® ® ® SP ® ® ® ® (i) (i) (i) (i)

® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®

--Course College/ School -CD First College -® Arts & Sciences -® Management -• Prof. Studies -® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -

Not Applicable Never

Seldom Sometimes Usµ:aµy

-----------. The Instructor: Always

i -·­·~ 1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... O · 0 O 0 O --'• -2. Explained course objectives and outco ~es. . ...................................... O .~ 0 O 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and eva uati n criteria. . ............................. 0 ·.· .. 0 0.·· .· 0 0 -c 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. ...................................... O 0 0 O 0 0 5. Made good use of community resource]. . . . ..................................... O • O Q 0 O 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... 0 ~ 0 b 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated the I' res ectfully ................................ eQOQOO 8. Created a classroom environment conduciv to learning. . ........................... 0 • 0 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... O 0 0 0 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ....................................... 0 f& 0 0 0 0 11 . Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ O (ft 0 Q 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities,

and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00000 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly. . ....................................... 0 • 0 Q 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work ................................ eOOQOO 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e t correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O • O O O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming .................................. 000000 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc ease understanding and application .............. Oi80000 18. Held class as scheduled. . ..................................................... 0 c:> 0 0 0 0

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?

O Excellent OVery Good OGood 0 Poor 0 Very Poor

20. How much have you learned in this course? 0 Exceptional Amount 0 Very Much OMuch OSome 0 Little

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? •Yes ONo

-·: --·: -· ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week did you typically spend preparing for class?

24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject? •Very O Somewhat 0 Not Very O Not at All

0 3 or Less 0 11 to 15 • 4 to 6 0 16 or More 0 7 to 10

of the classroom space? -OVeryGood -OGood -• Satisfactory Viii?,. -0 Unacceptable ~R -

Page 18: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Please write comments in the boxes below.

A. What did you like about the course/instructor?

B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?

Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.

Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.

Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Page 19: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Metropolitan D Inst uc ional Improvement Questionnaire State University 1iITWfillj

Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an n

Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School

• Please use pencil or blue/black ink. • Fill response ovals completely - do

not use V's or Xs to mark choices.

• Answer questions on both sides.

The Instructor:

2 0 @ • CD CD

• ® ® ® © © ® ® ® ® (j) (j)

® ® ® ®

CD First College 1 0 =--; _, @ • ® Arts & Sciences

• CD CD SU ® Management ® ® e Prof. Studies ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. ®CI ® ® l

(j) (j)

® ® ® ®

l Not Applicable

Never

Seldom J Sometimes · 1

l .. :::_ "'" :_ Usua11Yc. 1 •.

l Always I; 1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... e O O 0 O O 2. Explained course objectives and outco~es ........................................ o•oooo 3. Explained course requirements and ev luati n criteria. . ............................. O • O Q O O 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. ...................................... 0 O e O 0 0 5. Made good use of community resource . . ........................................ 0 • 0 O 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly ...................................................... 090000 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res· ectfully ................................ eOO()OO 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ to learning. . ........................... e O O 0 0 O 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... O • 0 O 0 O

10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ...................................... O 9 O O O O 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ • 0 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, .

and sexual orientation ...................................................... eOOOOO 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly. . ....................................... 0 0 • 0 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work ................................ oq14t1600 15. Informed students of their progress in ti et correct deficiencies ...................... 000000 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming. . ................................ O 8 O O O O 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. 000000 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... @OOOOO

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?

O Excellent •Very Good OGood 0 Poor O Very Poor

20. How much have you learned in this course? O Exceptional Amount every Much OMuch osome O Little

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? ifl'Yes ONo

---------------------------··· _,. -··· -· -.: ----· ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week

did you typically spend preparing for class?

24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?

OVery •Somewhat O Not Very O Not at All

O 3 or Less O 11 to 15 e 4 to 6 O 16 or More 0 7 to 10

of the classroom space? ei Very Good OGood O Satisfactory O Unacceptable

---

Page 20: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Please write comments in the boxes below.

A. What did you like about the course/instructor?

B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?

Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.

Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.

Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Page 21: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Metropol.itap. II Inst uc ional Improvement Questionnaire State Uruvers1ty [i!cmrrn

---Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer

---questions on both sides. All responses are an n

• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

• Fill response ovals completely - do not use V's or Xs to mark choices.

• Answer questions on both sides.

--Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School -2 0 1 0 .3 CD First College -® • ® • Ci> Arts & Sciences -CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management -

• Ci> Ci> Ci> \Ii) Prof. Studies -® ® ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -© © © © @ Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® SP -@ @ @ @ -<}) <}) <}) <}) -® ® ® ® -CV CV CV CV ---l Not Applicable

_[ Never -l .·.· ·· ... _:_::_ •:z ~e1d.0B1; J Sometimes • ---The Instructor: l , ,~ . ·.. !Js11aqY,~

1

[ Always I 1

: -·-1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... O • O d O O -·-·-2. Explained course objectives and outco es ........................................ <lOQOQOO -3. Explained course requirements and ev ·luati n criteria. . ............................. • 0 O o 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. ...................................... O • O q 0 O 5. Made good use of community resource . . ........................................ 0 • 0 O 0 0 -L 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... • .6 O O 0 O 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully ................................ 900000 8. Created a classroom environment conduciv to learning ............................. •OOOOO 9. Kept discussion on track .................................................... O<ltOQOO

10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ...................................... 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ 0 O 0 O 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, •···

and sexual orientation ...................................................... eooooo 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly. . ....................................... 0 6 ti» Q 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work. . .............................. • 6 O 0 O O 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e t correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O ·riWJ Ob O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming .................................. 000000 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. iDOOQOO 18. Held class as scheduled. . ..................................................... <I> 6 0 d 0 0

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?

O Excellent every Good OGood 0 Poor 0 Very Poor

20 How much have you learned in this course? O Exceptional Amount ~Very Much OMuch osome O Little

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? •Yes ONo

-(

-.: ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week did you typically spend preparing for class?

24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?

OVery ~Somewhat

0 Not Very O Not at All

O 3 or Less O 11 to 15 • 4 to 6 O 16 or More 0 7 to 10

of the classroom space? iS Very Good OGood O Satisfactory O Unacceptable

---

Page 22: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Please write comments in the boxes below.

A. What did you like about the course/instructor?

B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?

Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.

Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.

Printed in USA • OMR Survey Systems • www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Page 23: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Metropolitan 0 Inst j c ional Improvement Questionnaire State Uruvers1ty mmm_u

---Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer

---questions on both sides. All responses are an n --Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School -• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

• Fill response ovals completely - do not use Vs or Xs to mark choices.

• Answer questions on both sides.

The Instructor:

2 ® CD

• ® © ® ® CV ® ®

0 1

• ® CD • ® ® ® ® © © ® ® ® ® CV CV ® ® ® ®

1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................... . 2. Explained course objectives and outco~es ........................ . 3. Explained course requirements and ev luati n criteria. . ............. . 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. . ..................... . 5. Made good use of community resource . . . . ..................... . 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . ................................... . 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully ................ . 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ to learning. . ........... . 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................... .

10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ...................... . 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................ . 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion,

and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................... . 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly. . ....................... . 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work ................ . 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e t correct deficiencies. . .... . 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming. . ................ .

0 '':< CD First College -• ® Arts & Sciences -CD CD SU ® Management -® • Prof. Studies -® • F,A ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -© ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® SP -® -CV -® -® --l Not Applicable ---l Never

l . Seldom ---l Sometimes

l ''-';; .• c. ··•Usual!~ L l Always I···•!

•• 6 0 0 0 0 -•• Q 0 0 0 0 -.. • 0 0 0 0 0 -~ @) 0 0 0 0 0

_, 0 ~ 0 Q 0 0 -·· .. •• 0 0 0 0 0 -;

.. • Q 0 0 0 0 _,

• 0 0 0 0 0 -0 • 0 Q 0 0 -• 0 0 0 0 0 -• () 0 0 0 0 -disabilities, --.. • 0 0 0 0 0 -............... • 0 0 0 0 0 ---............... • 0 0 () 0 0 ............... != 0 0 d 0 0 ............... d 0 0 0 0 -17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .0 • 0 0 0 0

() 18. Held class as scheduled. . ..................................... .

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?

•Excellent O Very Good OGood 0 Poor O Very Poor

22. How important was class attendance for understanding the subject?

OVery ~Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All

20. How much have you learned in this course? 6 Exceptional Amount O Very Much 91 Much OSome 0 Little

23 How many hours per week did you typically spend preparing for class? 0 3 or Less 0 11 to 15 e 4 to 6 0 16 or More 0 7 to 10

.. •• 0 0 0 0

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? •Yes ONo

----------24. How would you rate the quality -of the classroom space? -OVeryGood -iaiGood -0 Satisfactory ~ -0 Unacceptable ~R -

Page 24: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Please write comments in the boxes below.

A. What did you like about the course/instructor?

B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?

Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.

Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.

Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Page 25: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Metropolitan II Inst Le ional Improvement Questionnaire State University tmW{[c[j

Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an n

Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School

---------• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

2 0 1 0 3 CD First College -® • ® • @ Arts & Sciences -

• Fill response ovals completely - do not use V's or Xs to mark choices.

G) G) • G) G) SU ® Management -

• @ @ @ . e Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. ® ® ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -

© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® SP ® ® ® ® (J) (J) (J) (J)

® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®

Not Applicable Never

Seldom Sometimes

The Instructor: Always .. ·· :.

1. Stimulated student thinking ...................................... -. -.. -.-.-. -.. -.-.-. -.. -.~. eb O O O O 2. Explained course objectives and outcoj es. . ...................................... 9 0 O 0 0 O 3. Explained course requirements and ev luati n criteria. . ............................. e () 0 Q 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized majner. ...................................... e O 0 Q 0 0 5. Made good use of community resource . . . . ..................................... • Q 0 Q 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... O Q 0 Q 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated the r res ectfully. . .............................. e 0 ...... 0 0·. ····.·.: 0 0 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ to learning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ...................................... ti 0 0 0 0 0 11 . Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ • 0 0 Q 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, .···.. '"

and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... • 0 0 0 0 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly ......................................... eoo()oo 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OOQOO 15. Informed students of their progress in ti et correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 0 O Q O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming .................................. 600000 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. •QOOOO 18. Held class as scheduled. . ..................................................... • 0 0 0 0 0

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?

•Excellent OVery Good OGood OPoor 0 Very Poor

20. How much have you learned in this course? •Exceptional Amount OVery Much OMuch OSome 0 Little

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? .eves ONo

-------------, -.:. --·· -· -'· -·· ----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week

did you typically spend preparing for class?

24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?

every O Somewhat 0 Not Very O Not at All

0 3 or Less 0 11 to 15 • 4 to 6 0 16 or More 0 7 to 10

of the classroom space? -OVeryGood -OGood -it Satisfactory -0 Unacceptable @R •

Page 26: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Please write comments in the boxes below.

A. What did you like about the course/instructor?

B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?

Thank you.for taking the time to answer these questions.

Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.

Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Page 27: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Metropolitan IJI Inst le ional Improvement Questionnaire State University !i!u~hcu ---Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be

used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer ---questions on both sides. All responses are an n

• Please use pencil or blue/black ink. • Fill response ovals completely - do

not use lls or Xs to mark choices.

• Answer questions on both sides.

•@@® 1 CDCDCDeCD 2@@@@@

3@@®®® 4@@©©© s®®®®® 6@@®®® 700000 s@@e@e 9®®®®®

Fiscal Year/Tr

2 0 1 0 {3_ ® • ® • CD CD • CD CD SU

• @ @ @

® ® ® ® • FA © © © © ® ® ® ® ® SP ® ® ® ® 0 0 0 0 ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®

--Course College/ School -CD First College -@ Arts & Sciences -® Management -• Prof. Studies -® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -®Law Enf./Crim. Just. -------Not Applicable -Never ---

The Instructor:

Seldom.· Sometimes

Usually -.-'· _____ AI_w~ays ••. ·, . -,,. 1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... e 0 0 O 0 0 -:: -2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ...................................... O O 0 0 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and evaluati n criteria. . ............................. e O 0 6 0 0 -~ '· 4. Presented material in an organized majner. ...................................... e Q 0 Q 0 0 -·· 5. Made good use of community resource . . . . ..................................... • 0 0 Q 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... • 0 0 6 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully ................................ •00000 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ to learning. . ........................... • 0 0 O 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... e 0 0 0 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ....................................... e Q 0 Q 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ e Q 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, .

and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... e 0 0 O 0 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly. . ....................................... e Q 0 0 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work ................................ e()OOOO 15. Informed students of their progress in ti et correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e 0 0 6 0 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming. . ................................ e 0 0 0 0 0 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. eQOOOO 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... eOOOOO

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor? e Excellent O Very Good OGood 0 Poor O Very Poor

20. How much have you learned in this course? O Exceptional Amount every Much OMuch OSome 0 Little

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? eves ONo

----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week did you typically spend preparing for class?

24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?

OVery e Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All

0 3 or Less 0 11 to 15 • 4 to 6 0 16 or More 0 7 to 10

of the classroom space? -every Good -OGood -0 Satisfactory ~ -0 Unacceptable ~R -

Page 28: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Please write comments in the boxes below.

A. What did you like about the course/instructor?

B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?

Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.

Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.

Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• Vv'W\v.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Page 29: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Metropolitan 0 Inst j c ional Improvement Questionnaire State University uc!i'ir.uti ---Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be

used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer ---questions on both sides. All responses are an n

• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

• Fill response ovals completely - do not use V's or Xs to mark choices.

• Answer questions on both sides.

••®@® 1 CDCDCDeCD 2@@®®® 3@@@@@

4©©©©© s@®®®® 6@@®®® 7 (J) (J) (J) (J) (J)

s®® @e 9@®®®®

Fiscal Year/Tr

2 0 1 0 1-...1

~

® • ® • CD CD • CD CD SU

• ® ® ® @ @ @ @ ~ FA © © © © ® ® ® ® ® SP ® ® ® ® (J) (J) (J) (J)

® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®

--Course College/ School -CD First College -® Arts & Sciences -@ Management -• Prof. Studies -® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -

Not Applicable Never

S~ldoll\·

Sometimes

· .. usuanr:

-----------The Instructor: Always . -·-1. Stimulated studentthinking. . ................................................... e b 0 b 0 0

2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ..................................... O • 0 b 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and eva uati n criteria. . ............................. O • 0 0 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner ....................................... 0900.00 5. Made good use of community resource . . . . ..................................... O fl? 0 a 0 O 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... 0. 0 0 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully ................................ o•oooo 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ to learning. . ........................... 0. 0 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... 0 tt 0 0 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ....................................... 0. 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ 0 • 0 Q 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, .. •.. ·· ..

and sexual orientation ...................................................... o•oooo 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly. . ....................................... 0 Q b 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work ................................ O 0000 15. Informed students of their progress in ti ~ t correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O 9 0 b 0 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement i~ le ming .................................. 0.0000 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. 090000 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... eOOOOO

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?

O Excellent every Good OGood OPoor 0 Very Poor

20. How much have you learned in this course? O Exceptional Amount e Very Much OMuch OSome 0 Little

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? eves ONo

.. --·--c

-: -_,: -· ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week did you typically spend preparing for class?

24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject? every O Somewhat O Not Very O Not at All

0 3 or Less 0 11 to 15 • 4 to 6 0 16 or More 0 7 to 10

of the classroom space? OVery Good eGood 0 Satisfactory 0 Unacceptable

---

Page 30: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Please write comments in the boxes below.

A. What did you like about the course/instructor?

( V\:\it\ \A~ ·last-;'- J l.o'M F z.-\1 j S-+v~~ ~5·

B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?

Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.

Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.

Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Page 31: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Metropol_itan 0 Inst le ional Improvement Questionnaire State Uruvers1ty [icmmu

Metropolitan State University would like in onn tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an n

Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School

---------2 0 1 0 3 CD First College -• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

® • ® • @ Arts & Sciences -• Fill response ovals completely - do

not use ti's or Xs to mark choices. CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management -

• @ @ @ e Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. ® ® ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -

© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® SP ® ® ® ® (j) (j) (j) (j)

® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®

Not Applicable Never

l_ ··· .::.: Seldom J Sometimes · ·

The Instructor: 1 ~ .. ..:::_ . . lJS]lall:r:· .. 1 [ Always ·v I >

1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... GOO O O O 2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ..................................... O 6 O d O O 3. Explained course requirements and eva uati n criteria. . ............................. e Q 0 O 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. ...................................... 0 () O 0 O O 5. Made good use of community resource . . . . ..................................... Op 0 0 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... • Q O q O O 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully ................................ OOOQOO 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ to learning ............................. 800Q00 9. Kept discussion on track ..................................................... O•OOOO

10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ....................................... O 0 0 O 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ O • 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, .. 1

and sexual orientation ...................................................... 800000 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly ......................................... 800000 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work. . .............................. e O O Q O O 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e t correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • O O () O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le rning. . ................................ O Q O Q O O 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc ease understanding and application .............. 000000 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... •OOQOO

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?

O Excellent OVery Good OGood 0 Poor 0 Very Poor

20. How much have you learned in this course? 8£xceptional Amount O Very Much 0 Much OSome 0 Little

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? •Yes ONo

-------------: -----: ----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week did you typically spend preparing for class?

24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject? OVery O Somewhat O Not Very 0 Not at All

0 3 or Less 0 11 to 15 e4 to 6 0 16 or More 0 7 to 10

of the classroom space? -OVeryGood -OGood -0 Satisfactory ~ -0 Unacceptable ~R -

Page 32: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Please write comments in the boxes below.

A. What did you like about the course/instructor?

6 -=m-Vl olll<t0 ' , \\,~& , ~ \1-'.llU.\ \.{ ()\) ty ~.c1 .. Jt & I) 'S - '-I D\J CL~ 4 3

-t6t\'f.eJ ~ \J~> \.\\<l Cl\)\JC'-~S

• eng~ -tt \~b'-trkl ~

B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?

@~~\pl e\Jt \Da~1~ ~ ~·~n~U \~"JO'f-\L

' ~·,\If \V\e 001 ()\/\ '\ti Not do IA: ~t> "?If~ t t+ ~ wov-v- o.A b vtt _

Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.

Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.

Printed in USA • OMR Survey Systems • ww\v.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Page 33: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Metropol.it~ llJ Inst uc ional Improvement Questionnaire State Umvers1ty [irrmuu

Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an n

Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School

---------2 0 1 • Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

0 B CD First College -® • ® • @ Arts & Sciences -

• Fill response ovals completely - do not use V's or Xs to mark choices.

CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management -

• @ @ @ e Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. ® ® ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -

© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® SP ® ® ® ® <J) <J) <J) <J)

® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®

Not Applicable Never

cSelclofu Sometimes

The Instructor: · ·• Jlsua~y •• j Always ··

1. Stimulated student tr.inking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p O O O O 2. Explained course 09jectives and outco I es. . ...................................... O. O () O O 3. Explained course ref uirements and eva:luati n criteria. . ............................. O 4'> O O O O 4. Presented material ran organized maj1rnner. ...................................... •. Q .... 00 ... ·00 5. Made good use of community resource . . ........................................ 9 Q 0 0 0 0

I •· .•. ·.

6. Spoke clearly and apdibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ()0000 7. Encouraged questi9ns and treated the res ectfully. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Q O O O O 8. Created a classroorr environment cond civ to learning. . ........................... e O O 0.... 0 O 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... O • 0 Q 0 O

10. Was prepared for sTssions with studen 1s. . ...................................... e () 0 Q 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ e 0 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respedtful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, .· .•

and sexual orientatibn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... • C) 0 C) 0 O 13. Defi~ed assignmen~s clearly and carefu ly ....

1 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• o,,.-().0.~ .... ·-··.oo

14. Provided helpful wri~en responses on s ude ts work ................................ o. .J 00 15. Informed students ~f their progress in ti et correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O ci O O 16. Facilitated students] active involvement in le ming. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00000 17. Designed assignm1nts and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. O. 0()00 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... eQOOOO

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?

O Excellent eNeryGood OGood OPoor 0 Very Poor

20. How much have you learned in this course? O Exceptional Amount O Very Much •Much OSome O Little

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? IOiYes ONo

------------c -::

'· --r--·: -;·

i. -i:: -< ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week

did you typically spend preparing for class?

24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?

QVery a somewhat O Not Very O Not at All

O 3 or Less O 11 to 15 • 4 to 6 O 16 or More O 7 to 10

of the classroom space? O Very Good •Good O Satisfactory O Unacceptable

---

Page 34: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Please write comments in the boxes below.

A. What did you like about the course/instructor?

B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?

Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.

Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.

Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Page 35: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Metropolitan ~ State University '"' ·rr

Inst uc ional Improvement Questionnaire

Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an n

Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School

---------• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

2 0 1 0 "J CD First College -® • ® • @ Arts & Sciences -

• Fill response ovals completely - do not use tis or Xs to mark choices.

CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management -

• Ci) Ci) Ci) • Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. ® ® ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -

© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® ® (J) (J) (J)

® ® ® @ @ @

The Instructor:

® ® SP ® (J)

® @

Not Applicable Never

Seldi)m· Sometimes

.. Usuall)'. Always

1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... O Q • Q 0 O 2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ...................................... O d • 6 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and evaluati n criteria ............................... OOeQOO 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. . ..................................... O 0 e b 0 0 5. Made good use of community resource . . . . ..................................... 0 Q • Q 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... • Q 0 0 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully ................................ o•OQOO 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ to learning. . ........................... 0 0 • Q 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... 0 0 • O 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ....................................... 0 d 9 b 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ 0 be Q 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, ..

and sexual orientation ...................................................... oeo6oo 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly ......................................... OQOOOO 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work ................................ OOeOOO 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e t correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O 6 Oji O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming. . ................................ O 6 • Q 0 0 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. OQ•OOO 18. Held class as scheduled. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?

O Excellent OVery Good OGood ePoor 0 Very Poor

20. How much have you learned in this course? 0 Exceptional Amount 0 Very Much 0 Much OSome •Little

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? •Yes ONo

------------·= -·~ -··· --·: -· -· -· ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week

did you typically spend preparing for class?

24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?

OVery O Somewhat -Not Very O Not at All

of the classroom space? -OVeryGood -

0 3 or Less 0 11 to 15 •Good -0 Satisfactory ~ -0 Unacceptable ~R -

9 4 to 6 0 16 or More 0 7 to 10

Page 36: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Please write comments in the boxes below.

A. What did you like about the course/instructor?

J11AL ~ .ft,, _J.q:) I V1~S A-hJ JiSc,t..Vnb"' [r...V'

ol(_ .

B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?

Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions. Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.

Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Page 37: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Metropol~t~ a Inst UC ional Improvement Questionnaire State Umvers1ty [imrmu

Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an n

• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

• Fill response ovals completely - do not use tis or Xs to mark choices.

• Answer questions on both sides.

6 di it Course ID

08t~ ••@@®

1 CDCDCD•CD 2 CDCDCDCDCD 3@@®®® 4@@©©© s®®®®® 6@@®®® 7 (j) (j) (j) (j) (j)

s@@•@• 9®®®®®

Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School

2 0 1 0 3 CD First College ® • ® • CD Arts & Sciences CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management

• CD CD CD e Prof. Studies ® ® ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. © © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. ® ® ® ® ® SP ® ® ® ® (j) (j) (j) (j)

® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®

J Not Applicable

J Never

J :_ Seldo1~ J Sometimes •.

--------------------------The Instructor: l -'- i ••··· i.lJsuilJ!;r 1.:;

l Always ··.·•···· -· 1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... e 0 0 0 0 0 -·: --2. Explained course objectives and outco ~es. . ...................................... O 4l 0 (j 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and eva uati n criteria. . ............................. O • .... ·· .. ·. 0 0 ..•....•.. 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. ...................................... e 0 0 Q 0 0

_., -5. Made good use of community resource1. . . . ..................................... e 0 0 0 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... e Q 0 0 0 0 -: 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully ................................ eOOQOO 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ to learning. . ........................... • 0 0 Q 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track .................................................... OOeOOO

10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ....................................... • 9 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ • 0 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, . · ... ·· I J •

and sexual orientation ...................................................... o•oooo 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly. . ....................................... e 9 0 0 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on s udeJts' work ................................ eOOQOO 15. Informed students of their progress in ti et correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • b 0 0 0 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming .................................. ejOOOOO 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. •OOOOO 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... eOOOOO

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor? e Excellent OVeryGood OGood OPoor 0 Very Poor

20. How much have you learned in this course? 0 Exceptional Amount every Much 0 Much OSome 0 Little

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? 9Yes ONo

---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week did you typically spend preparing for class?

24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject? •Very O Somewhat 0 Not Very O Not at All

0 3 or Less 0 11 to 15 • 4 to 6 0 16 or More 0 7 to 10

of the classroom space? -every Good -OGood -0 Satisfactory ~ -0 Unacceptable ~R -

..

Page 38: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Please write comments in the boxes below.

A. What did you like about the course/instructor?

l. ~Jctje.ol ttA-l- 1vt5t/victor~ fV\CJ~efrl ffY<:;;fecilVl!5 ,q~ or///o.e,c4 fcJ Jeot{ln~ wlth "5eV1£11-Nf fVPtfen11t!.

B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?

Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.

Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.

Printed in USA• OMR. Survey Systems• 1vwv.-.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Page 39: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Metropol_it~ Ill Inst uc ional Improvement Questionnaire State Uruvers1ty !irmurn ---Metropolitan State University would like in onn tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be

used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer ---questions on both sides. All responses are an n

• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

• Fill response ovals completely - do not use V's or Xs to mark choices.

• Answer questions on both sides.

The Instructor:

--Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School -2 0 1 0 3 CD First College -® • ® • @ Arts & Sciences -CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management -

• @ @ @ e Prof. Studies -® ® ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® SP -® ® ® ® -(f) (f) (f) (f) -® ® ® ® -® ® ® ® --l Not Applicable ------

J Never l -cc ;_ Seidom

J Sometimes

J 2 IJ s:tially l Always 1' .··•·

1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . O e O O O O -·· ---2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O • O O O O 3. Explained course requirements and ev .luati n criteria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O 6 O O O O

-·· · .. 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e O O () O O 5. Made good use of community resource . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · I• 6 0 0 0 0 -· 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O O O O O -· 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 000000 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ to learning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 0 () 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e () 0 () 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • Q 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, >i

and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e () 0 0 0 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 • 0 0 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o•oooo 15. Informed students of their progress in ti et correct deficiencies. . . . . . . _. O GOO O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O • O O O O 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application . 000000 18. Held class as scheduled. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <ilOOOOO

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?

O Excellent every Good OGood OPoor O Very Poor

20. How much have you learned in this course? O Exceptional Amount •Very Much OMuch OSome O Little

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? GYes ONo

-· ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week did you typically spend preparing for class?

24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?

OVery 0 Somewhat 0 Not Very O Not at All

O 3 or Less O 11 to 15 O 4 to 6 O 16 or More 0 7 to 10

of the classroom space? OVery Good •Good O Satisfactory 0 Unacceptable

---

Page 40: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Please write comments in the boxes below.

A. What did you like about the course/instructor?

B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?

Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.

Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.

Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Page 41: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Metropolitan 0 ·Inst uc ional Improvement Questionnaire State University [j[[rr'iuu

Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an n

Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School

• Please use pencil or blue/black ink. • Fill response ovals completely - do

not use ti's or Xs to mark choices. • Answer questions on both sides.

The Instructor:

2 ® G)

• ® © ® ® CV ® ®

0 1

• ® G) • @ @

® ® © © ® ® ® ® CV CV ® ® ® ®

0 3 CD First College

• @ Arts & Sciences G) G) SU ® Management @ • Prof. Studies ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. ® ® SP ® CV ® ®

l Not Applicable

l Never

l Seldom :. _.::. .

_[ Sometimes

J ...:::::... :Us11ally r Always i'·-

1. Stimulated student thinking ..................................................... o•odOO 2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ...................................... O C5 • O O O 3. Explained course requirements and ev luati n criteria. . ............................. 8 C5 O O O O 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. ...................................... e O O O O O 5. Made good use of community resource . . . . ..................................... O O e d O O 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... • 6 O O O O 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully ................................ ieOOQOO 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ tci learning ............................. eOOQOO 9. Kept discussion on track .................................................... o•OOOO

10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ....................................... O • O 0 O O 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ e 0 0 0 0 O 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities,

and sexual orientation ..................................................... -191QOOOO 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly. . ....................................... O 8 0 O 0 O 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work ................................ o•oooo 15. Informed students of their progress in ti et correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O e O O O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming. , ................................ 000000 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. GOOOOO 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... •OOOOO

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?

O Excellent every Good OGood 0 Poor O Very Poor

20. How much have you learned in this course? O Exceptional Amount e Very Much OMuch osome O Little

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? •Yes ONo

----------------------------.: ---·-., --'-

-~ -·: ----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week did you typically spend preparing for class?

24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?

OVery O Somewhat O Not Very O Not at All

O 3 or Less O 11 to 15 O 4 to 6 O 16 or More O 7 to 10

of the classroom space? OVery Good eGood O Satisfactory O Unacceptable

---

Page 42: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Please write comments in the boxes below.

A. What did you like about the course/instructor?

B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?

Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.

Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.

Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Page 43: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Metropol_it~ D Inst uc ional Improvement Questionnaire State Umvers1ty !irmurn

Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri ulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an ny ous.

Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School

• Please use pencil or blue/black ink. • Fill response ovals completely - do

not use V's or Xs to mark choices.

• Answer questions on both sides.

2 ® CD

• ® © ® ® (j)

® ®

0 1

• ® CD • @ @

® ® © © ® ® ® ® (j) (j)

® ® ® ®

0 3 CD First College

• @ Arts & Sciences CD CD SU ®Management @ • Prof. Studies ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. ® ® SP ® (j)

® ®

J Not Applicable

J Never

L_ j_ Se!dorii J Sometimes ·. ·

The Instructor: L ~-'!- .1J~µa~)'.. .· ·

l Always •···•· . 1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... • O O () 0 0 2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ...................................... • () O O O O 3. Explained course requirements and evailuati n criteria. . ............................. • () O 0 O O 4. Presented material in an organized marlmer. ...................................... • O O O O O 5. Made good use of community resource . . ........................................ • 0 0 () O O 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... O 6 0 Q 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res, ectfully ................................ •OOOOO 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ to learning ............................. •()OQOO 9. Kept discussion on track .................................................... •OOOOO

10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ...................................... • () O 0 O O 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ e () 0 () O O 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, 1 I'

and sexual orientation ...................................................... •QOOOO 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly. . ....................................... • O 0 Q 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work. . .............................. cp O O O O O 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e t · correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • O O t5 O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming .................................. eOOQOO 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. SOOOOO 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... eOOOOO

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?

•Excellent O Very Good OGood OPoor 0 Very Poor

20. How much have you learned in this course? • Exceptional Amount O Very Much OMuch QSome O Little

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? eves QNo

---------------------------· '· -~ -( _,: ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week

did you typically spend preparing for class?

24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?

every O Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All

O 3 or Less O 11 to 15 e 4 to 6 O 16 or More 07to10

of the classroom space? O Very Good eGood O Satisfactory O Unacceptable

---

Page 44: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Please write comments in the boxes below.

A. What did you like about the course/instructor?

B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?

\ " b lflt(P \Q \...... V I

Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.

Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.

Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Page 45: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Metropolitan ~ State University ~ ................

Inst uc ional Improvement Questionnaire

Metropolitan State University would like in arm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri ulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an n

Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School

---------• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

2 0 1 0 ~ CD First College -® • ® • v ® Arts & Sciences -

• Fill response ovals completely - do not use V's or Xs to mark choices.

CD CD • CD CD SU @ Management -

• ® ® ® • Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. @ @ @ @ • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -

© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® SP ® ® ® ® (j) (j) (j) (j)

® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®

Not Applicable Never

The Instructor:

L_ ._. '.· Seldom

J Sometimes l •i f ~ ·.•·_L_ _::_ , U~uaUy ' ,1

[ Always ...... '

1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... @IQ O Q O O 2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ...................................... e b Ob O O 3. Explained course requirements and evaluati n criteria. . ............................. $ Q O () O O 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. ...................................... • O O Q O O 5. Made good use of community resource . . . . ..................................... e Q 0 O 0 O 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... e Q O () O O 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully. . .............................. • O O Q O O 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ to learning. . ........................... e O 0 Q 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... • 0 0 0 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ....................................... • Q 0 Q 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ e 0 0 b 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, ··,· <

and sexual orientation ...................................................... •OOQOO 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly ......................................... eOOOOO 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work. . .............................. • O O O O O 15. Informed students of their progress in ti et correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 6 O O O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming .................................. •OOOOO 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. eOOOOO 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... •OOOOO

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?

•Excellent OVery Good OGood O Poor O Very Poor

20. How much have you learned in this course? O Exceptional Amount •Very Much OMuch osome O Little

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? •Yes ONO

-----------.. --· ---:· ---· _ ..

-· ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week did you typically spend preparing for class?

24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject? •Very O Somewhat O Not Very 0 Not at All

O 3 or Less O 11 to 15 • 4 to 6 O 16 or More 0 7 to 10

of the classroom space? e Very Good OGood O Satisfactory O Unacceptable

---

Page 46: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Please write comments in the boxes below.

A. What did you like about the course/instructor?

B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?

Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.

Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.

Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems • www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Page 47: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Metropolitan ~ State University ~' '~' ........ .&.J

Inst uc ional Improvement Questionnaire

Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri ulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an n

Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School

---------• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

2 0 1 0 r2J CD First College -

• Fill response ovals completely - do not use ti's or Xs to mark choices.

® • ® • CD Arts & Sciences -CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management -

• CD CD CD e Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. ® ® ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -

© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® SP

• ® ® ® ® (j) (j) (j) (j)

® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®

J Not Applicable [ Never

The Instructor:

J J • 2 . S~me~!:()l}l l .. -'- ~ J_ '· Ust!~IIY,.

[ Always .. . .

1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... e 0 0 O 0 0 2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ...................................... O • 0 CS 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and ev luati n criteria. . ............................. 0 d 0 d 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. ...................................... e b O O O O 5. Made good use of community resource . . ........................................ e O 0 O O O 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... e 0 O O O O 7. Encouraged questions and treated the pres ectfully ................................ •ooqoo 8. Created a classroom environment conduciv to learning. . ........................... e O O O 0 O 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... e 0 0 b O O

10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ...................................... • .O 0 O 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ • 0 0 D 0 O 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities,

and sexual orientation ...................................................... •OOOOO 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly. . ....................................... 0 0 0 • 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work. . .............................. e O O 6 O O 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e t correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e O O O O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming .................................. •OOOOO 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. •bOOOO 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... eOOQOO

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?

eExcellent OVeryGood OGood OPoor 0 Very Poor

20. How much have you learned in this course? O Exceptional Amount every Much OMuch OSome O Little

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? •Yes ONo

------------~ • .. -c -i .. -< -, -::

' -c ~: -·: ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week

did you typically spend preparing for class?

24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?

OVery 0 Somewhat 0 Not Very O Not at All

O 3 or Less O 11 to 15 O 4 to 6 O 16 or More 0 7 to 10

of the classroom space? •Very Good OGood O Satisfactory O Unacceptable

---

Page 48: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Please write comments in the boxes below.

A. What did you like about the course/instructor?

She'<; very nood. o.r- 11'1a t<t'n(') th 9 no..c:;r t-imP Vqrv o.ct/Vf) "'nd Tl v -c- vi 1n vo111/ng

B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?

QufzeS" and f-E'~K- Cho\Jtd bf' p10-nh.Qcl ovt ~heCAd Of time (

~xp1afn O.':;~ 1 g nrn~nt-s- !Y)-af-'?

Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.

Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.

Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems • www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Page 49: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Metropolitan ~ Inst uc ional Improvement Questionnaire -State University _ ... ~-~ --Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer

---questions on both sides. All responses are an n

• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

• Fill response ovals completely - do not use V's or Xs to mark choices.

• Answer questions on both sides.

The Instructor:

l111Dl11911J•I@@@

1 CD CD CD C11 CD 2@@®®® 3@@®®® 4©©©©© s®®®®® 6@@®®® 7 (j) (j) (j) (j) (j)

s@@•@• 9®®®®®

--Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School -2 0 1 0 '.J__ CD First College -® • ® • ® Arts & Sciences -CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management -

• ® ® ® • Prof. Studies -® ® ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® SP -® ® ® ® -(j) (j) (j) (j) -® ® ® ® -® ® ® ® --Not Applicable -Never -· seldom -Sometimes --IJ:suany• -Always > .;:

~------'l

1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... O tp 0 O 0 0 --2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ..................................... O • 0 0 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and eva uati n criteria. . ............................. O Q ~ b 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. . ..................................... O • 0 6 0 0 5. Made good use of community resource . . . . ..................................... ,. 9 j' - ---! 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... • (j 0 ____ '0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully ................................ •qopoo 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ to learning. . ........................... • 0 0 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... ~ 0 0 0 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ....................................... Ci Q 0 O 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ • Q 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, · _-_.. _ .·

and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... • Q 0 0 0 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly ......................................... OO•QOO 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00000 15. Informed students of their progress in ti et correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O • 0 0 0 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming. . ................................ O • 0 0 0 0 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc ase understanding and application .............. •OOOOO 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... <800000

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?

O Excellent 9l Very Good OGood OPoor 0 Very Poor

20. How much have you learned in this course? 0 Exceptional Amount •very Much 0 Much OSome 0 Little

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? eves ONo

·--_;_ -·~ -· -·' -< ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week

did you typically spend preparing for class?

24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject? •Very 0 Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All

0 3 or Less • 11 to 15 0 4 to 6 0 16 or More 0 7 to 10

of the classroom space? -OVeryGood -OGood -• Satisfactory ~ -0 Unacceptable ~R -

Page 50: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Please write comments in the boxes below.

A. What did you like about the course/instructor?

\J-e_, ~ t, e__cL-l\ 0e..- ~<l 7~ ~\-ls 0-e._

Y\t_ ~~A \4 \:_~<-0-.~ CZJ-\- ud-l ~

~ \~4-~\ \\ \ r Se_ nCS-e_ a~ \.\ l.-\_M~<

B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?

5 \~ .,h :\- ~~L-0 "- ·~\AS'.\- ~ '\~\ t ~ c_ ~ Ade-n.~~ -\- h_e_

~ 4 l-e. r I 4-\ _.___ --r \) ~ h \J\ C... \.-\. \{Y\. 4--\:"t...""' \ ~ \

Y (" t.-b ~ n ~G. ~ '0 0 ~ er <::;_ ~ h. .c;:i 1 l::_ ~ -e_ r Z ~ ~ q 11 V'-L.12__

Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.

Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.

Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3

Page 51: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Metropolitan "l I Inst Le ional Improvement Questionnaire State University · ---Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be

used in our continued efforts to improve the urric lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer ---questions on both sides. All responses are an n

• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.

• Fill response ovals completely - do not use V's or Xs to mark choices.

• Answer questions on both sides.

The Instructor:

---Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School

2 0 1 0 '.9 CD First College -® • ® • @ Arts & Sciences -CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management -

• @ @ @ e Prof. Studies -® ® ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -® ® ® ® ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® SP -® ® ® ® -(j) (j) (j) (j) -® ® ® ® -® ® ® ® --l Not Applicable -Never -'-"- .··. seii:Iom ---J Sometimes

J ~ {Jsually I.: l Always ·..•.••. ····•·.·

1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... O O O Q O O -·= -·O 2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ..................................... O Q O 6 O O

. -·-3. Explained course requirements and eva uati n criteria. . ............................. Ob• d 0 0 --•. 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. . ..................................... O Q • O 0 0 -< 5. Made good use of community resource . . . . ..................................... 0 Q 0 - 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... 0. 0 0 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully ................................ •¢0000 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ to learning. . ........................... 0 • 0 () 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... 0 9 0 0 0 0

10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ....................................... e 0 0 O 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ 0 e 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, I' •

and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... • O 0 O 0 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly. . ....................................... 0 0 0 • 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work. . .............................. O Q • O 0 O 15. Informed students of their progress in ti et correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O O e O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming. . ................................ O 0 O O 0 O 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc ease understanding and application .............. OeOOOO 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... (1)00000

19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?

0 Excellent •Very Good OGood OPoor O Very Poor

20. How much have you learned in this course? O Exceptional Amount e Very Much OMuch OSome 0 Little

21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? •ves ONo

-: -: -·· ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week

did you typically spend preparing for class?

24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?

OVery 0 Somewhat •Not Very 0 Not at All

0 3 or Less e 11 to 15 0 4 to 6 0 16 or More O 7 to 10

of the classroom space? -OVeryGood -•Good -0 Satisfactory ~ -0 Unacceptable ~R -

Page 52: ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 - Kerry s kleyman phdkerrykleyman.weebly.com/uploads/4/4/0/9/44093831/psyc336_fa09.pdf · llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional

Please write comments in the boxes below.

A. What did you like about the course/instructor?

Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.

Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.

Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3