vagal tone: effects on sensitivity, motility, and inflammation · vn stimulation (vns), either...
TRANSCRIPT
MINI-REVIEW
Vagal tone: effects on sensitivity, motility, and
inflammation
B. BONAZ,*,† V. SINNIGER*,† & S. PELLISSIER†,‡
*University Clinic of Hepato-Gastroenterology, University Hospital, Grenoble, France
†Stress and Neuro-Digestive Interactions, Inserm U1216, University Grenoble Alpes, Institute of Neurosciences, Grenoble, France
‡Department of Psychology, LIP/PC2S, Savoie University, Chamb�ery, France
Key Points
• The vagus nerve is involved in the control of gastrointestinal sensitivity, motility and inflammation.
• A low vagal tone, as assessed by heart rate variability, is a marker of autonomic dysfunction that might favor
dysfunction of the gastrointestinal tract.
• Restoration of vagal tone is a therapeutic target in some gastrointestinal diseases. Vagus nerve stimulation,
either invasive or non-invasive, opens therapeutic avenues.
Abstract
The vagus nerve (VN) is a key element of the
autonomic nervous system. As a mixed nerve, the
VN contributes to the bidirectional interactions
between the brain and the gut, i.e., the brain-gut axis.
In particular, after integration in the central auto-
nomic network of peripheral sensations such as
inflammation and pain via vagal and spinal afferents,
an efferent response through modulation of pregan-
glionic parasympathetic neurons of the dorsal motor
nucleus of the vagus and/or preganglionic sympathetic
neurons of the spinal cord is able to modulate
gastrointestinal nociception, motility, and inflamma-
tion. A low vagal tone, as assessed by heart rate
variability, a marker of the sympatho-vagal balance, is
observed in functional digestive disorders and inflam-
matory bowel diseases. To restore a normal vagal tone
appears as a goal in such diseases. Among the
therapeutic tools, such as drugs targeting the cholin-
ergic system and/or complementary medicine (hypno-
sis, meditation. . .), deep breathing, physical exercise,
VN stimulation (VNS), either invasive or non-invasive,
appears as innovative. There is new evidence in the
current issue of this Journal supporting the role of VNS
in the modulation of gastrointestinal functions.
Keywords inflammatory bowel disease, motility,
pain, vagal tone, vagus nerve stimulation.
INTRODUCTION
In the current issue of this journal, Frokjaer et al.1
assessed, in healthy volunteers, the effects of transcu-
taneous vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and deep slow
breathing on validated cardiometrically derived param-
eters of vagal tone, musculoskeletal pain thresholds,
descending pain modulation and gastroduodenal motil-
ity in a randomized, sham-controlled, single-blind,
crossover trial. They showed that transcutaneous VNS
increased: (i) vagal tone, (ii) thresholds to bone pain,
(iii) frequency of antral contractions, and (iv)
Address for Correspondence
Bruno Bonaz, MD-PhD, Clinique Universitaire d’H�epato-Gastroent�erologie, CHU Grenoble, CS-10217, 38043 GrenobleCedex 09, France.Tel: +33476765597; fax: +33476765297;e-mail: [email protected]: 2 February 2016Accepted for publication: 9 February 2016
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 455
Neurogastroenterol Motil (2016) 28, 455–462 doi: 10.1111/nmo.12817
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
gastro-duodenal motility index. These data have poten-
tial therapeutic implications in the domain of chronic
pain and gastrointestinal motility disturbances but also
inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract as
observed in functional dyspepsia, irritable bowel syn-
drome (IBS), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and
others.
The VN is a key part of the autonomic nervous
system (ANS), composed of the parasympathetic and
sympathetic nervous systems. Information regarding
the extent of its involvement in the regulation of the
digestive tract homeostasis is rapidly expanding and
provides new insights from a therapeutic point of view.
The VN is the longer nerve in the body; it is a mixed
nerve containing approximately 80% afferent and 20%
efferent fibers2 supplying mostly visceral organs. Vagal
afferents are activated by gastrointestinal and pancre-
atic hormones, mechanical distortion of the mucosa,
luminal osmolarity and ingested macronutrients, and
are involved in the regulation of food intake, pancreatic
exocrine and endocrine secretion, and cardiac and
respiratory rhythm generation.
In normal resting conditions, there is a balance
between the parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous
systems as indexed by heart rate variability (HRV).3
This balance is modified in acute stress condition
because stress induces a parasympathetic withdrawal
and stimulates the sympathetic nervous system.4 This
balance is restored after acute stress but in chronic
stress conditions it can be disrupted for long periods.
Stress is involved in the pathophysiology of functional
and organic diseases of the gastrointestinal tract such
as functional dyspepsia, IBS, IBD (Crohn’s disease,
ulcerative colitis).5,6 An imbalance between the ANS
and the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis has
been reported in such diseases.7 This imbalance is
often the consequence of an imbalance between the
prefrontal cortex (PFC) and the amygdala which inner-
vate central autonomic network (CAN) areas.8 Thus,
an abnormal vagal tone could be the cause and/or the
consequence of such an imbalance. Consequently,
restoration of normal vagal tone could be of interest
in the medical management of such diseases either
through drugs targeting the cholinergic system, com-
plementary medicine (hypnosis, meditation. . .), deep
breathing, physical exercise, VNS. This might favor-
ably prevent an individual’s risk profile.
In this mini-review, we highlight the anatomy of the
ANS with a special focus on the VN and the central
ANS and the control/evaluation of vagal tone in
normal and pathological conditions through HRV. We
will focus on the role of vagal tone on sensitivity,
motility, and inflammation of the gastrointestinal
tract. Finally, we will review nonpharmacological
ANS modulation therapies, focusing on VNS, com-
menting on novel technologies and strategies on the
horizon.
THE AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEMAND THE CENTRAL AUTONOMICNETWORK
Visceral information conveyed by vagal and spinal
afferents are integrated in the CAN containing brain
regions highly interconnected and distributed through-
out the neuraxis involved in the autonomic, endocrine,
motor, immune, and behavioral responses.9 These
regions include: the frontal, insular, and anterior cingu-
late cortices; the amygdala (central nucleus); several
areas of the hypothalamus, in particular the paraven-
tricular nucleus (PVH); the midbrain periaqueductal
gray matter; the parabrachial nucleus in the pons; and,
in themedulla, the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS), the
first relay station for general visceral afferents, ventro-
lateral reticular formation and raphe nuclei. This brain
network can be divided roughly into structures such as
the frontal cortex, which are involved in higher level
executive functions, and structures such as thehypotha-
lamus and limbic system, which are involved in home-
ostatic functions. These areas receive converging
visceral and nociceptive inputs and, after integration,
generate stimulus-specific patterns of autonomic
responses via projections to preganglionic sympathetic
neurons in the spinal cord and parasympathetic neurons
of the dorsal motor nucleus of the VN to modulate the
ANS and thus the vagal tone. Many of these areas are
also components of pain modulatory circuits and con-
trol nociceptive processing via projections to the spinal
and trigeminal dorsal horns. The CAN is a complex
system including many positive and negative feedback
loops governing both sympathetic and parasympathetic
outputs. Because of this complexity, it is difficult to
predict the final results of activity of this system since
prefrontal activation might induce enhancement of
sympathetic activity in one situation but enhancement
of vagal activity in another.
VAGAL TONE AND THE CENTRALAUTONOMIC NETWORK
Vagal tone could be explored via the cardiac vagal tone
by means of HRV measurement.3 However, correla-
tions between cardiac vagal tone and, for example,
gastrointestinal vagal tone require further study, par-
ticularly under pathophysiological conditions. There is
no a priori reason why vagal output from the nucleus
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd456
B. Bonaz et al. Neurogastroenterology and Motility
ambiguus to the heart is regulated in concert with
vagal output from the dorsal motor nucleus of the VN
to the stomach. Actually, this method even if not
direct, provides the advantage of being non-invasive,
easy to apply and perform comparisons among different
studies. The cardiac vagal tone and HRV have allowed
the construction of the neurovisceral integration
model that includes the CAN.10 A decreased HRV at
rest reflects a low vagal tone and could be considered as
a marker of stress.11 Decreased vagal function and HRV
are associated with increased fasting glucose level,
increased overnight urinary cortisol, and increased pro-
inflammatory cytokines and acute-phase proteins.12
All of these factors have been associated with increased
allostatic load and poor health. A high level of HRV is
associated with good health and well-being and good
resilience in emotional self-regulation.13,14 A high
level of HRV with low level of cortisol reflects the
inhibitory influence of the PFC on amygdala.12 The
PFC contributes to negative feedback control of the
HPA axis.15 The hypoactivity of the PFC and the
enhancement of amygdala activity are strongly influ-
enced by stress. The PFC regulates peripheral immune
cells through the autonomic and neuroendocrine
pathways and controls vagal tone by modulating the
VN efferent outflow. Increased inflammatory markers,
e.g., C reactive protein and IL-6 are associated with
decreased HRV.16 We have described an imbalance
between the HPA axis and vagal tone in CD and IBS
patients.7 Furthermore, we highlighted the specific
homeostatic link between a low vagal tone and tumor
necrosis factor (TNF)-a in Crohn’s disease and epi-
nephrine in IBS in relation with a strong comorbidity of
negative mood, anxiety, and visceral pain that has been
observed in those diseases.7 These data, underline the
link between brain areas involved in cognition and
mood regulation, visceral perception and conscious-
ness, stress response, and HRV as a marker of vagal
tone in gut diseases.
VAGAL TONE AND SENSITIVITY
Classically, pain arising from the viscera is mediated
exclusively by spinal afferents and there is evidence
that the sympathetic nervous system is involved in
pain generation in chronic pain states.17 There is
growing evidence that the VN modulates nociceptive
processing in the spinal cord and the brain.18 Studies
have shown that vagal afferents respond to nociceptive
mechanical and chemical stimulation and this leads to
brainstem representation of nociceptive signals. The
increase in NTS c-fos expression observed in response
to noxious gastric distention is attenuated by vago-
tomy but persists after spinal cord transection.19 It has
been suggested that nociceptive input through the VN
may contribute to the affective-emotional rather than
to the sensory-discriminative aspect of pain. Thus, the
VN may indirectly modulate abdominal hyperalgesia.
Electrical stimulation of abdominal vagal afferents
inhibits or facilitates somatic nociceptive impulse
transmission in the spinal dorsal horn, and depresses
nociceptive behavior, depending on whether unmyeli-
nated or myelinated vagal afferents are excited.18
Patients with VNS for epilepsy and depression often
report improvement of pain. There is evidence for a
relationship between VN activity and pain, based on
the fact that the VN inhibits factors that are etiologic
to pain such as inflammation, oxidative stress, and
sympathetic activity, activates brain regions that can
oppose the brain ‘pain matrix’, and finally influences
the analgesic effects of opioids.20 Administration of
cholecystokinin (CCK)-8 enhances memory retention
in the mice after aversive training; this effect is
blocked by vagotomy indicating that CCK-8 may
produce its effect on memory retention by activating
vagal afferents.21 Thus, in a number of gastrointestinal
disorders, such as IBS, nutrient content may contribute
to painful visceral perception by enhancing visceral
aversive memory via vagal afferent pathways.22
Activation of vagal afferents is part of themechanism
that not only gives rise to vago-vagal reflex but also can
modulate brain cortex neuronal activity and plays a role
in the behavioral control of nociception and memory
storage processes.23 It is well known that a hot drink or a
nourishing meal are relaxing and help to calm anxiety
suggesting that enhanced sensory vagal inputs originat-
ing fromthegutmodulateattitudeandbehavior.24Vagus
nerve stimulation suppresses experimentally induced
pain through activation of vagal afferents which termi-
nate in the NTS; NTS neurons then innervate the CAN
and the nucleus raphe magnus and locus coeruleus, to
cause subsequent activation of descending inhibitory
painpathways.25Low-intensityVNSthatactivatesvagal
afferent Ad fibers reduces visceral pain suggesting that a
group of vagal afferents innervating viscera may have
functions related to visceral pain inhibition.23
VAGAL TONE AND MOTILITY
The VN innervates classically the digestive tract from
the esophagus to the splenic flexure while the rest of
the digestive tract, i.e., the left colon and rectum, is
innervated by the sacral parasympathetic nucleus.
However, for some anatomists, the VN innervates all
the digestive tract in human.26 The VN is a major
component in the control of upper gastrointestinal
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 457
Volume 28, Number 4, April 2016 Mini-review
motility, thus a low vagal tone could favor gastroin-
testinal motility disturbances. Vagal dysfunction is
known to contribute to esophageal hypomotility.27
Physiological vagal input to cholinergic enteric neu-
rons is necessary to maintain a basal gastric tone and
vagal cooling induces a decrease in gastric tone.28 A
very low tonic vagal activity is apparently necessary
and sufficient to produce basic antral motility, while
more sustained vagal activity is necessary for high-
amplitude gastric contractions and significant sus-
tained fundic relaxation; the maximal effect of vagal
stimulation on amplitude and length of gastric con-
traction is already reached at 2–4 Hz, with no further
increase at 8 Hz.29 Chewing gum, via activation of
cephalic stimulation, is an adequate stimulus to
induce vagally mediated normalization of meal-
induced antral motility in functional dyspepsia, sug-
gesting that hypomotility is related to inadequate vagal
stimulation.30 Antral dysmotility is a consistent find-
ing in diabetics with delayed gastric emptying and
impaired gastric autonomic innervation probably con-
tributes to this dysmotility. Patients with Type 1
diabetes mellitus have impaired meal-induced volume
response, possibly as a consequence of reduced vagal
tone.31 Gastric dysmotility in diabetes is thus caused,
at least in part, by vagal neuropathy and the VN is
important for gastric meal accommodation in man.
Stress is well known to delay gastric emptying, alter
intestinal transit and colonic motility and inhibit vagal
tone; this effect is mediated, at least in part, by
corticotrophin-releasing factor.4 Autonomic dysfunc-
tion has been frequently reported in patients with
gastrointestinal motility disorders. By stimulating
gastrointestinal motility via activation of vagal path-
ways,32 gum chewing reduces the duration of postop-
erative ileus in abdominal surgery.33 Nicotine gum
chewing combines the stimulation of the cephalic-
vagal reflex by gum chewing and the activation of the
cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway by nicotine
administration; it might be beneficial for the preven-
tion of postoperative ileus.34 Improving vagal tone
through gum chewing, deep breathing,1 moderate-
pressure massage therapy, or other exercises that have
a strong effect on heart rate and its variability or
through VNS could have prokinetic effects. Further
investigations are needed to explore the intestinal
component of digestive tract motility under the mod-
ulation of vagal tone re-inforcement.
VAGAL TONE AND INFLAMMATION
TheVNexerts a dual anti-inflammatory role through its
afferents and efferents. Classically, peripheral pro-
inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1beta, activate
vagal afferents and then the HPA axis through nora-
drenergic projections from the NTS to the PVH.35 More
recently, an anti-inflammatory role of vagal efferents
has been described by Tracey’s group. Indeed, VNS-
induced acetylcholine release from the peripheral ter-
minals of vagal efferents dampens the release of TNF-aby macrophages in a model of endotoxic shock in rats.
This effect is mediated via activation of a7-nicotinicreceptors on macrophages and defined as the inflamma-
tory reflex, i.e., the cholinergic anti-inflammatory
pathway.36 The same group has described a vago-
sympathetic link involving a stimulatory effect of the
VN on the spleen through an interaction with the
splenic sympathetic nerve resulting in the inhibition of
TNF-a release by spleen macrophages36 although this
pathway has been recently revisited.37 We have shown
that vagal tone is significantly blunted in IBD in relation
with negative affect,38 and high TNF-a levels.7 Conse-
quently, low vagal tone has a pro-inflammatory effect.
Low vagal tone is a significant predictor of necrotizing
enterocolitis, an exaggerated inflammatory response
resulting in high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines,
in preterm infants39 which opens up avenues for its role
as a predictive biomarker of this disease. Stress is
evoked in the pathophysiology of inflammatory disor-
ders such as IBD, at least through an inhibition of vagal
tone either through activation of projections from the
hypothalamus to the dorsal motor nucleus of the VN or
through modifications of the fronto-amygdaloid com-
plex.5 We have shown that low frequency (5 Hz) VNS
improves colitis in rats40 and may exert an anti-
inflammatory effect in Crohn’s disease patients that
exhibit an autonomic imbalance.41 We showed that
VNS induced a clinical, biological, and endoscopic
remission at 6 months in the majority (5/7) of patients
with mild to moderate active Crohn’s disease and
restored autonomic balance toward the homeostatic
values observed in healthy subjects.38 We have also
shown, in a case report, that VNS induced significant
changes in resting EEG.42 In particular, activation was
observed over the mediofrontal electrodes for both low
and high frequency bands with the most important
activation for theta band. Significant correlations were
detected between EEG and high frequency-HRV for
delta, theta, beta, and gamma frequency bands.
THERAPEUTIC IMPLICATIONS:ACTIVATION OF VAGAL AFFERENTS/EFFERENTS
Vagus nerve stimulation can be used to modu-
late gastrointestinal inflammation, motility, and
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd458
B. Bonaz et al. Neurogastroenterology and Motility
nociception, in addition to its current use for drug-
resistant epilepsy and depression and open new
avenues in the therapeutic armamentarium. Implan-
table VNS is an invasive technique, which poses a risk
for adverse events from infection, although the risk is
low since the technique is well described and com-
monly used. To avoid potential bradycardia, VNS
electrodes are placed on the left cervical VN which is
easily accessible at the level of the neck. ~100 000
patients have been implanted with invasive VNS for
epilepsy and depression. Depending on the therapeutic
purpose, either anti-inflammatory and/or anti-nocicep-
tive, or prokinetic, one might suggest activating vagal
afferents in case of nociception or vagal efferents in
case of inflammation and for prokinetic effect. How-
ever, classically while low (5–10 Hz) frequency VNS is
supposed to activate vagal efferents and high (20–30 Hz) frequency is supposed to activate vagal affer-
ents, in practice things are not so simple. Indeed, we
have shown that even low frequency (5 Hz) VNS is able
to modulate CNS functions.43 Consequently, it seems
unlikely to selectively activate vagal afferents or
efferents alone. In addition, one may speculate that
activation of both vagal afferents and efferents may be
of interest in the domain of inflammation, pain, and
gastrointestinal motility. The total charge for the
device plus implantation varies from $12 000 to
$25 000. By comparison, the cost of a 1 year treatment
of biosimilar infliximab is ~6000 euros for the treat-
ment alone in IBD.
Newer non-invasive VNS delivery systems do not
require surgery and permit patient-administered stim-
ulation on demand. These non-invasive VNS systems
improve the safety and tolerance of VNS and are easy
to use, making it more accessible and facilitating
further investigations across a wider range of uses. Two
non-invasive VNS devices are currently on the market
(Fig. 1). NEMOS (Cerbomed, Erlangen, Germany) is an
external device that provides transcutaneous auricular
VNS (ta-VNS) by using a dedicated intra-auricular
electrode (like an earphone) which stimulates the
auricular branch of the VN. No clinically relevant
adverse events, either cardiovascular or otherwise,
have been reported with this device. The recom-
ImplantableVNS devices Non-implantable VNS devices
Figure 1 Implantable VNS systems: (top)
VNS Therapy system (Cyberonics, Houston,
TX, USA); (bottom) CardioFit (BioControl
Medical Ltd.). Non-implantable VNS
systems: (top) NEMOS (Cerbomed), (bottom)
gammaCore (electroCore LLC).
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 459
Volume 28, Number 4, April 2016 Mini-review
mended daily stimulation duration is 4 h and should
be reached daily. Transcutaneous auricular VNS is able
to increase HRV and reduce sympathetic nerve outflow
in healthy controls.44 GammaCore (electroCore LLC,
Basking Ridge, NJ, USA), is a non-invasive VNS device
that uses two stainless steel round discs as skin
contacts to deliver a programmable number of stimu-
lation cycles through a transcutaneous low voltage
electrical signal to the cervical VN, each lasting 120 s
at a frequency of 25 Hz. This device is currently being
tested for headache, epilepsy, and gastrointestinal
disorders.45
Some data is emerging regarding the use of VNS,
either invasive on non-invasive, in fibromyalgia,
pelvic pain, and headaches (see for review 46). Lange
et al.47 examined the safety and tolerability of inva-
sive VNS in treatment resistant fibromyalgia and
determined preliminary measures of efficacy as a
secondary endpoint in this small cohort. Together
with what is already known about VNS and its
antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects, find-
ings from preliminary studies are promising in terms
of addressing the hyperalgesia and central sensitiza-
tion associated with chronic pelvic pain and other
chronic pain syndromes.48
Ideally, VNS coupled to the detection of HRV would
be of interest, particularly in patients with vagal
dysautonomia, i.e., vagal hypotony as observed in IBD
and IBS. The neurostimulator itself, for example, could
also be used to measure HRV.38 For example, CardioFit
(BioControl Medical Ltd., Yehud, Israel) is an implan-
table VNS device being investigated in heart failure
that acts through preferential activation of vagal
efferents.49 The system consists of a stimulator, a
sensor lead and a stimulation lead, which are
implanted under the skin of the chest. The sensor lead
is extended from the stimulator to the right ventricle of
the heart, and the stimulation lead is extended from
the stimulator to the VN on the right side of the neck.
Once activated, the stimulator’s electrical pulses are
transferred via the stimulation lead to the VN. The
stimulation is designed to correct the autonomic
imbalance (sustained sympathetic overdrive and
parasympathetic withdrawal) that is maladaptive in
heart failure. Unfortunately, CardioFit is an invasive
system. A VNS device coupled to skin conductance
evaluation, as a marker of sympathetic nervous system
activity, would be of interest as well. In the same way,
a VNS device coupled to circulating TNF-a levels
would be of interest. Indeed, following intraperitoneal
administration of TNF-a, the VN senses changes in
peripheral inflammatory status within 3 min, and
increases vagal tone in response.50 This defines a
mechanism of inflammation sensing by the brain.
Another point, is the improvement of VNS device
through a miniaturization of the device and a multi-
contact electrode that would stimulate ideally all the
fibers components of the VN or selectively afferents or
efferents. However, the exact topographic distribution
of vagal afferents/efferents in the VN needs to be
specified. Although non-implantable devices are attrac-
tive, they raise the problem of compliance as observed
in the medical treatment of chronic diseases with
drugs and which is avoided by the classical invasive
VNS.
CONCLUSION
As a bidirectional link between the brain and the
gastrointestinal tract the VN is involved in maintain-
ing the homeostasis of gut functions such as sensitiv-
ity, motility, and immunity both through its sensing
and modulatory roles. A dysfunction of the vagal tone
is observed in functional and inflammatory digestive
disorders. To restore a normal vagal tone is a thera-
peutic goal in such diseases where VNS appears as an
interesting tool.
FUNDING
No funding obtained for this mini review.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
No conflicts of interest exist.
REFERENCES
1 Frøkjaer JB, Bergmann S, Brock C,Madzak A, Farmer AD, Ellrich J,Drewes AM.Modulation of vagal toneenhances gastroduodenal motility andreduces somatic pain sensitivity.Neurogastroenterol Motil 2016; 28:592–8.
2 Prechtl JC, Powley TL. The fibercomposition of the abdominal vagusof the rat. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1990;181: 101–15.
3 Heart rate variability. Standards ofmeasurement, physiological interpre-tation, and clinical use. Task Force ofthe European Society of Cardiologyand the North American Society of
Pacing and Electrophysiology. Eur
Heart J 1996; 17: 354–81.4 Tache Y, Bonaz B. Corticotropin-
releasing factor receptors and stress-related alterations of gut motorfunction. J Clin Invest 2007; 117:33–40.
5 Bonaz BL, Bernstein CN. Brain-gutinteractions in inflammatory bowel
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd460
B. Bonaz et al. Neurogastroenterology and Motility
disease. Gastroenterology 2013; 144:36–49.
6 Mulak A, Bonaz B. Irritable bowelsyndrome: a model of the brain-gutinteractions. Med Sci Monit 2004; 10:RA55–62.
7 Pellissier S, Dantzer C, Mondillon L,Trocme C, Gauchez AS, Ducros V,Mathieu N, Toussaint B et al. Rela-tionship between vagal tone, cortisol,TNF-alpha, epinephrine and negativeaffects in Crohn’s disease and irritablebowel syndrome. PLoS ONE 2014; 9:e105328.
8 Buijs RM, Van Eden CG. The integra-tion of stress by the hypothalamus,amygdala and prefrontal cortex: bal-ance between the autonomic nervoussystem and the neuroendocrine sys-tem. Prog Brain Res 2000; 126: 117–32.
9 Benarroch EE. The central autonomicnetwork: functional organization,dysfunction, and perspective. Mayo
Clin Proc 1993; 68: 988–1001.10 Thayer JF, Hansen AL, Saus-Rose E,
Johnsen BH. Heart rate variability,prefrontal neural function, and cogni-tive performance: the neurovisceralintegration perspective on self-regula-tion, adaptation, and health. Ann
Behav Med 2009; 37: 141–53.11 Porges SW. Cardiac vagal tone: a
physiological index of stress. Neu-rosci Biobehav Rev 1995; 19: 225–33.
12 Thayer JF, Sternberg E. Beyond heartrate variability: vagal regulation ofallostatic systems. Ann N Y Acad Sci2006; 1088: 361–72.
13 Goldstein MR, Lewis GF, NewmanR, Brown JM, Bobashev G, KilpatrickL, Sepp€al€a EM, Fishbein DH et al.Improvements in well-being andvagal tone following a yogic breath-ing-based life skills workshop inyoung adults: two open-trial pilotstudies. International Journal of Yoga2016; 9: 20–6.
14 Werner GG, Ford BQ, Mauss IB, Sch-abus M, Blechert J, Wilhelm FH. Highcardiac vagal control is related tobetter subjective and objective sleepquality. Biol Psychol 2015; 106: 79–85.
15 Czeh B, Perez-Cruz C, Fuchs E,Fl€ugge G. Chronic stress-induced cel-lular changes in the medial prefrontalcortex and their potential clinicalimplications: does hemisphere loca-tion matter? Behav Brain Res 2008;190: 1–13.
16 Sloan RP, McCreath H, Tracey KJ,Sidney S, Liu K, Seeman T. RR inter-
val variability is inversely related toinflammatory markers: the CARDIAstudy. Mol Med 2007; 13: 178–84.
17 Day M. Sympathetic blocks: the evi-dence. Pain Pract 2008; 8: 98–109.
18 Randich A, Gebhart GF. Vagal affer-ent modulation of nociception. BrainRes Brain Res Rev 1992; 17: 77–99.
19 Traub RJ, Sengupta JN, Gebhart GF.Differential c-fos expression in thenucleus of the solitary tract andspinal cord following noxious gastricdistention in the rat. Neuroscience
1996; 74: 873–84.20 De Couck M, Nijs J, Gidron Y. You
may need a nerve to treat pain: theneurobiological rationale for vagalnerve activation in pain management.Clin J Pain 2014; 30: 1099–105.
21 Flood JF, Smith GE, Morley JE. Modu-lation of memory processing bycholecystokinin: dependence onthe vagus nerve. Science 1987; 236:832–4.
22 Cao B, Zhang X, Yan N, Chen S, Li Y.Cholecystokinin enhances visceralpain-related affective memory viavagal afferent pathway in rats. Mol
Brain 2012; 5: 19.23 Chen SL,Wu XY, Cao ZJ, Fan J, Wang
M, Owyang C, Li Y. Subdiaphrag-matic vagal afferent nerves modulatevisceral pain. Am J Physiol Gastroin-
test Liver Physiol 2008; 294: G1441–9.
24 Zagon A. Does the vagus nerve medi-ate the sixth sense? Trends Neurosci
2001; 24: 671–3.25 Kirchner A, Birklein F, Stefan H,
Handwerker HO. Left vagus nervestimulation suppresses experimen-tally induced pain. Neurology 2000;55: 1167–71.
26 Delmas J, Laux G. Anatomie m�edico-
chirurgicale du syst�eme nerveuxv�eg�etatif. Sympathique et parasym-pathique. Paris, France, Masson,1933.
27 Cunningham KM, Horowitz M, Rid-dell PS, Maddern GJ, Myers JC, Hol-loway RH, Wishart JM, Jamieson GG.Relations among autonomic nervedysfunction, oesophageal motility,and gastric emptying in gastro-oeso-phageal reflux disease. Gut 1991; 32:1436–40.
28 Azpiroz F, Malagelada JR. Importanceof vagal input in maintaining gastrictone in the dog. J Physiol 1987; 384:511–24.
29 Berthoud HR, Hennig G, CampbellM, Volaufova J, Costa M. Video-basedspatio-temporal maps for analysis of
gastric motility in vitro: effects ofvagal stimulation in guinea-pigs.Neurogastroenterol Motil 2002; 14:677–88.
30 Lunding JA, Nordstr€om LM, Hauke-lid AO, Gilja OH, Berstad A, HauskenT. Vagal activation by sham feedingimproves gastric motility in func-tional dyspepsia. Neurogastroenterol
Motil 2008; 20: 618–24.31 Undeland KA, Hausken T, Aanderud
S, Berstad A. Lower postprandial gas-tric volume response in diabeticpatients with vagal neuropathy. Neu-
rogastroenterol Motil 1997; 9: 19–24.32 Vasquez W, Hernandez AV, Garcia-
Sabrido JL. Is gum chewing useful forileus after elective colorectal surgery?A systematic review and meta-analy-sis of randomized clinical trials. J
Gastrointest Surg 2009; 13: 649–56.33 Li S, Liu Y, Peng Q, Xie L, Wang J,
Qin X. Chewing gum reduces postop-erative ileus following abdominalsurgery: a meta-analysis of 17 ran-domized controlled trials. J Gastroen-
terol Hepatol 2013; 28: 1122–32.34 Wu Z, Boersema GS, Jeekel J, Lange
JF. Nicotine gum chewing: a novelstrategy to shorten duration of post-operative ileus via vagus nerve acti-vation. Med Hypotheses 2014; 83:352–4.
35 Fleshner M, Goehler LE, Hermann J,Relton JK, Maier SF, Watkins LR.Interleukin-1 beta induced corticos-terone elevation and hypothalamicNE depletion is vagally mediated.Brain Res Bull 1995; 37: 605–10.
36 Pavlov VA, Tracey KJ. Neural cir-cuitry and immunity. Immunol Res
2015; 63: 38–57.37 Martelli D, McKinley MJ, McAllen
RM. The cholinergic anti-inflamma-tory pathway: a critical review.AutonNeurosci 2014; 182: 65–9.
38 Pellissier S, Dantzer C, Canini F,Mathieu N, Bonaz B. Psychologicaladjustment and autonomic distur-bances in inflammatory bowel dis-eases and irritable bowel syndrome.Psychoneuroendocrinology 2010; 35:653–62.
39 Doheny KK, Palmer C, Browning KN,Jairath P, Liao D, He F, Travagli RA.Diminished vagal tone is a predictivebiomarker of necrotizing enterocoli-tis-risk in preterm infants. Neurogas-
troenterol Motil 2014; 26: 832–40.40 Meregnani J, Clarenc�on D, Vivier M,
Peinnequin A, Mouret C, Sinniger V,Picq C, Job A. Anti-inflammatoryeffect of vagus nerve stimulation in
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 461
Volume 28, Number 4, April 2016 Mini-review
a rat model of inflammatory boweldisease. Auton Neurosci 2011; 160:82–9.
41 Bonaz B, Sinniger V, Hoffmann D,Clarençon D, Mathieu N, Dantzer C,Vercueil L, Picq C et al. Chronicvagus nerve stimulation in Crohn’sdisease: a 6-month follow-up pilotstudy. Neurogastroenterol Motil
2016. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12792.42 Clarencon D, Pellissier S, Sinniger
V, Kibleur A, Hoffman D, VercueilL, David O, Bonaz B. Long termeffects of low frequency (10 hz)vagus nerve stimulation on EEGand heart rate variability in Crohn’sdisease: a case report. Brain Stimul
2014; 7: 914–6.43 Reyt S, Picq C, Sinniger V, Clarenc�on
D, Bonaz B, David O. DynamicCausal Modelling and physiologicalconfounds: a functional MRI study ofvagus nerve stimulation.NeuroImage2010; 52: 1456–64.
44 Clancy JA, Mary DA, Witte KK,Greenwood JP, Deuchars SA, Deu-chars J. Non-invasive vagus nervestimulation in healthy humansreduces sympathetic nerve activity.Brain Stimul 2014; 7: 871–7.
45 Nesbitt AD, Marin JC, Tompkins E,Ruttledge MH, Goadsby PJ. Initial useof a novel noninvasive vagus nervestimulator for cluster headache treat-ment. Neurology 2015; 84: 1249–53.
46 Chakravarthy K, Chaudhry H, Wil-liams K, Christo PJ. Review of theuses of vagal nerve stimulation inchronic pain management. Curr Pain
Headache Rep 2015; 19: 54.47 Lange G, Janal MN, Maniker A,
Fitzgibbons J, Fobler M, Cook D,Natelson BH. Safety and efficacy ofvagus nerve stimulation in fibromyal-gia: a phase I/II proof of concept trial.Pain Med 2011; 12: 1406–13.
48 Napadow V, Edwards RR, CahalanCM, Mensing G, Greenbaum S,
Valovska A, Li A, Kim J et al. Evokedpain analgesia in chronic pelvic painpatients using respiratory-gated auric-ular vagal afferent nerve stimulation.Pain Med 2012; 13: 777–89.
49 Abraham WT, Stough WG, Pi~na IL,Linde C, Borer JS, De Ferrari GM,Mehran R, Stein KM et al. Trials ofimplantable monitoring devices inheart failure: which design is opti-mal? Nat Rev Cardiol 2014; 11:576–85.
50 Silverman HA, Robbiati S, SteinbergBE, Stiegler A, Tsaava T, BattinelliEA, Huerta PT, Tracey KT et al.
Tumor Necrosis Factor Induces aCytokine Specific Sensory Vagus
Neurogram. Chicago, IL: Society forNeuroscience, 2015.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd462
B. Bonaz et al. Neurogastroenterology and Motility