vaibhav v. rajhans - njbmsnjbms.in/uploads/19/3300_pdf.pdf · 2019-02-02 · vaibhav v. rajhans1,...
TRANSCRIPT
Microbiological Study of Neonatal Sepsis Using Automated
Blood Culture System at a Tertiary Health Care Centre
226
Original Article
1 2 3 4 5Vaibhav V. Rajhans , Sharmila S. Raut , Sanjay R. More , Vimal S. Rathod , Vivek M. Gujar
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Sepsis in neonates is responsible for highly considerable mortality, especially in
developing countries like India, where it is contributing 19% of neonatal deaths. Present study was
undertaken to study aerobic bacterial profile of neonatal septicemia by automated blood culture
systems, using BacT/ALERT 3D 60 blood culture system and miniAPI bacterial identification and
antibiotic susceptibility testing system, considering the importance of urgent and accurate
identification of the pathogen and to reduce the unnecessary therapeutic load on patients as well as
clinicians.
Aim: To isolate and identify bacterial pathogens in neonatal sepsis and to know their antibiotic
susceptibility pattern using BacT/ALERT and miniAPI systems.
Material and Methods: 157 blood samples from neonates suspected to be in sepsis were studied
during the study period using BacT/ALERT 3D 60 systems for blood culture and miniAPI system
for identification and antibiotic susceptibility of isolates.
Results: 70 blood cultures were flagged positive by BacT/ALERT. E.coli was the most common i.e
16 (22.85%); followed by Coagulase negative Staphylococcus (CoNS), isolated in 15 (21.42%),
followed by Staphylococcus aureus isolated in 14 (20%).
Conclusion: Total blood culture positivity rate was 44.58%. E. coli was the most common pathogen
isolated. By using BacT/ALERT 3D 60, 65.71% blood culture positivity was observed within 24
hours incubation and bottles flagged positive within 48 hours were 59 (84.28%). Both, the
BacT/ALERT 3D 60 and the miniAPI systems, were efficient, less time consuming and labor saving
which is essential for the clinician and more importantly for the patient.
Key words : Neonatal sepsis, Bacterial sepsis, automated blood culture, BacT/ALERT, miniAPI
INTRODUCTION:
eonatal sepsis is responsible for 30- 50%
of the total neonatal deaths in developing Ncountries. It is estimated that up to 20%
of the neonates develop sepsis and approximately
1% die of sepsis related causes. According to the
data from National Neonatal Perinatal Database,
sepsis is found to be one of the commonest causes
of neonatal mortality in India contributing to 19%
of all neonatal deaths.
There is an urgent need to know whether the baby
has sepsis to institute treatment as quickly as
possible. Confirmation of the diagnosis may take
time, and diagnostic tests are used to obtain a rapid
Address for correspondence:
Dr. Vaibhav V. Rajhans, Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Aurangabad,
Maharashtra - 431 001 Email id: [email protected] Ph.No: 9766003534
1Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Aurangabad, Maharashtra.2Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology, I.G.G.M.C. Nagpur, Maharashtra.3Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology,S.R.T.R.G.M.C. Ambajogai, Maharashtra.4Associate professor, Department of Microbiology, Dr.S.C.G.M.C. Nanded, Maharashtra.5Associate professor, Department of Microbiology, Shri V.N.G.M.C. Yavatmal, Maharashtra.
National Journal of Basic Medical Sciences | Volume 7 | Issue 4 | 2017
227National Journal of Basic Medical Sciences | Volume 7 | Issue 4 | 2017
indication of the infection status. These tests are not
perfect. Some real cases of infection will produce
negative test results, whereas some babies without
infection will test positive.
The gold standard for diagnosis of septicemia is the 1isolation of bacterial agents from the blood culture.
Newer methods of detecting bacteremia through
blood culture studies have emerged and are proven
to be most promising with better sensitivity and 2
specificity; while not sacrificing time. Continuous
monitoring demonstrates that most positive blood
cultures are detected in a relatively short period of 3time, the majority within 24 hours.
BacT/ALERT 3D is an automated culture system,
which continuously monitors for any growth in
every 10min in each bottle independently. The
equipment works on the principle of colorimetry
and gives a signal as soon as any trace of growth is 4encountered based on inbuilt set of algorithms.
The API system includes 32 wells containing
dehydrated reagent that corresponds to various
biochemical reactions using which most of the
microorganisms can be processed using rapid strips 5
in just 4-5 hours.
Adjusting antibiotic therapy according to the
results of blood culture findings leads to a
narrowing of antibiotic therapy. Thereby, the
emergence of antibiotic resistance can be avoided
or delayed. Antibiotic resistance may be reversed if
the antibiotic use is decreased.
Hence, present study was undertaken to study
aerobic bacterial profile of neonatal septicemia by
automated blood culture systems, using
BacT/ALERT 3D 60 blood culture system and
miniAPI (Figure 1) bacterial identification and
antibiotic susceptibility testing system, both by
Biomerieux.
Figure 1. The BacT/ALERT 3D 60 system and
miniAPI system
Dr. Vaibhav V.Rajhans, et.al : A bacteriological study of sepsis in neonates using BacT/ALERT and miniAPI at a tertiary care centre
228National Journal of Basic Medical Sciences | Volume 7 | Issue 4 | 2017
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Study Design:
Blood culture sample of neonates were subjected
for processing under automated blood culture
system BacT/ALERT 3D 60 and positive blood
culture samples were further processed by using
miniAPI system for bacterial identification and
antibiotic susceptibility testing of isolates.
This Observational study was conducted in the
microbiology laboratory of a tertiary care hospital
over a period of one and a half year (January 13 to
June 14). Blood samples from clinically diagnosed
or suspected neonates with septicemia (0-28 days
of age) of both the sexes during the study period
were collected and processed.
61-2 ml of blood sample from the each neonate was
collected and inoculated in special pediatric blood
culture media bottle - The BacT/Alert PF bottle
containing 20ml broth. Collection of blood was 7
done using all standard aseptic precautions. After
blood was collected in the syringe using the needle;
same needle was used to inoculate BacT/Alert 6bottles.
The Bact/Alert bottles possess
a plastic top cap which is to be
removed by breaking just
before inoculation. Under the
plastic cap, there is a rubber
septum which is not sterile
and hence was cleansed with
70% alcohol or iodine
solution and allowed to dry
before inoculation. Blood was
introduced into the bottle only
after the drying of rubber 8septum.
The inoculated bottles were loaded into the
BacT/Alert 3D/60 system incubator and incubated 9,10
for a maximum period of 5 days. The bottles
contain media and atmosphere which promote the
recovery of a wide variety of microorganisms
without venting. Standard BacT/Alert software
provided with the system was used for recording
the results. Bottles flagged as negative after the
maximum period of 5 days were unloaded from
incubator and subcultured for a final confirmation.
Bottles flagged as positive were unloaded from the
system and processed further as follows -
Appropriate amount of fluid was aspirated from the
bottles with sterile precautions. This fluid was used
for smear preparation for Gram staining and
subculture; for which Nutrient agar, 5% Blood agar,
MacConkey agar were inoculated and incubated.
Based on colony morphology of the growth on
subcultured media plates, Gram staining of the
smear from colony, Catalase test and Oxidase test;
selection and processing of miniAPI strips for
identification and antibiotic susceptibility of that
organism was done as per manufacturer's
instructions. (Figure 2)
Figure 2.For selection of miniAPI strips.
Dr. Vaibhav V.Rajhans, et.al : A bacteriological study of sepsis in neonates using BacT/ALERT and miniAPI at a tertiary care centre
229National Journal of Basic Medical Sciences | Volume 7 | Issue 4 | 2017
The miniAPI strips are basically made up of plastic having 32 wells or depressions; called as cupules, in each strip. The ID strips are for the identification of the organism and ATB strips are for the antibiotic susceptibility of that isolate. ID strips are provided with biochemicals and other reagents in dried and preserved form in the cupules. ATB strips are provided with the antibiotics in dried preserved form in the cupules.
After the selection, the ID strips as well as the ATB strips were inoculated according to the guidelines provided by the manufacturer.
The miniAPI strips used are
Identification strips (ID strips)Rapid ID 32 E, ID 32 GN, ID 32 STAPH, rapid ID 32 STREP.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing strips (ATB strips)Rapid ATB E 4, ATB PSE 5, ATB STAPH 5, ATB STREP 5, ATB ENTEROC 5.
The strips were then read using the miniAPI system.
OBSERVATION AND RESULTS:
Out of total 157 blood samples, 99 (63.05%) samples were collected from male and 58 (36.94%) were from female neonates. Out of them, 70 (44.58%) were flagged as positive by BacT/ALERT 3D 60 system and 87 (55.41%) were negative. (Figure 3)
Figure 3. Blood culture report by BacT/ALERT
As far as Time duration taken by BacT/ALERT 3D
60 is concerned, of the total 70 culture positive
samples, 46 (65.71%) were flagged positive within
first 24 hours of incubation. Additional 13
(18.57%) were flagged between 24-48 hours and 11
(15.71%) samples were flagged positive after 48
hours. In total, 59 (84.28%) positive blood samples
were detected within 48 hours of incubation.
(Figure 4)
Figure 4. Time taken to flag the bottles as
positive by BacT/ALERT 3D 60 system
Sex wise distribution of culture positive cases
revealed positivity more in male, i.e. 44 (62.85%)
out of 70; while Female neonates comprised of 26
(37.14%). The male to Female ratio observed was
1.69:1. (Figure 5)
Figure 5. Sex wise distribution of culture
positive cases
Of the total 70 isolates, E.coli was the most
common i.e 16 (22.85%); followed by Coagulase
Dr. Vaibhav V.Rajhans, et.al : A bacteriological study of sepsis in neonates using BacT/ALERT and miniAPI at a tertiary care centre
230National Journal of Basic Medical Sciences | Volume 7 | Issue 4 | 2017
negative Staphylococcus (CoNS), isolated in 15
(21.42%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus
isolated in 14 (20%), Klebsiella pneumoniae in 10
(14.28%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 6 (8.57%),
En t e rococcus f aeca l i s -3 (4 .28%) and
Streptococcus pyogenes in 2 (2.85%). (Figure 6)
Figure 6. Organism wise distribution of isolates
from positive blood samples
Antibiotic susceptibility patterns:
Among Coagulase negative Staphylococci
(CoNS), maximum susceptibility was found to the
Quinupr i s t in -Da l fopr i s t in (100%) and
Vancomycin (100%) followed by Minocycline
(93.33%) and Levofloxacin (86.66%). Least
susceptibil i ty by CoNS was shown to
Erythromycin (40%) and to Penicillin (13.33%).
Staphylococcus aureus showed maximum
susceptibility to the Quinupristin-Dalfopristin
(100%) and Vancomycin (100%) followed by
Tetracycline (85.71%) and Rifampicin (78.57%).
Cotri-moxazole and Penicillin were the drugs to
which Staphylococcus aureus isolates were least
susceptible, 42.85% and 21.42%, respectively.
E.coli isolates were most susceptible to Piperacillin
+ Tazobactum (93.75%) and Nitrofurantoin
(93.75%), followed by Ticarcillin + Clavulanic
acid (87.5%). Least susceptibility of E.coli isolates
was observed to Cefepime (18.75%) and
Ampicillin (12.50%).
Among Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, maximum
susceptibility was shown to Piperacillin +
Tazobactum (90%) and Piperacillin (80%)
followed by Ciprofloxacin (70%) and Ceftriaxone
(70%). Least susceptibility was shown to
Ampicillin (20%), Cefoxitin (20%) and Cefazolin
(10%).
Pseudomonas aeruginosa were most susceptible to
Imipenem (100%), Meropenem (100%) and
Piperacillin + Tazobactum (83.33%) followed by
Amikacin (66.66%) and Gentamicin (66.66%).
These isolates were least susceptible to Cefepime
(33.33%) and Ticarcillin (16.66%)
Among the 70 neonates who were diagnosed to be
having septicemia by positive blood cultures, 58
(82.85%) improved and were discharged from the
wards. 12 (17.14%) neonates succumbed to their
illness.
DISCUSSION:
Globally, an estimated 4 million babies die in the
first 4 weeks of life (the neonatal period) every 11
year and half of them die in their 1st 24 hours. It
accounts for 40% of under 5 mortality. 98% of these 12
deaths occur in developing countries.
In India, the Sample Registration System estimates
of neonatal mortality for the year 2010 is about 25
per 1000 live births in early neonatal period (0-7
days) with 28 for rural areas and 15 for urban 12areas.
In our study, out of 157 blood samples, 44.58% i.e.
70 blood samples were confirmed as positive. 13Ghanshyamet al (2002) in their study, observed
42 .00% pos i t i v i ty i n b lood cu l tu re s .
Dr. Vaibhav V.Rajhans, et.al : A bacteriological study of sepsis in neonates using BacT/ALERT and miniAPI at a tertiary care centre
231National Journal of Basic Medical Sciences | Volume 7 | Issue 4 | 2017
14Ananthakrishnanet al (2009) in their study
concluded that 40.6% samples were positive in 15blood culture. According to Gandhi S et al (2013)
out of 238 samples studied, blood culture was
positive in 76 cases (32%).
16In the study by Wadud A et al (2009) , out of 4915
sample, 707 (14.38 %) were positive by
BacT/ALERT system. In the study by Kennedy GT 3
et al (1995) , Four thousand bottles were analyzed,
of which 477 (11.92%) were positive by
BacT/ALERT system. The percentage of positivity
in our study is higher as compared to the above
mentioned studies where BacT/ALERT system
was used.
Out of 70, for11 (15.71%) samples the
BacT/ALERT system needed more than 48 hours to
detect as positive while 59 (84.28%) positive
samples were detected within 48 hours of
incubation.
3Kennedy GT et al (1995) mentioned in their study
that, 29% positive blood cultures were detected in
less than 12 hours, 68% by 24 hours, 81% by 48
hours, and 87% by 72 hours.
Our observations about detecting 84.28% positive
samples in less than 48 hours duration is
comparable with the study by Kennedy GT et al.
7In the study by Jyothi P et al1 , among the culture
positive cases, there were 86 (65.5%) male and 45
(34.5%) female neonates with the male-to-female
ratio of 1.9:1.
18In the study by HaseebM et al (2014), analysis
with respect to sex of the baby showed that 65 cases
(61.9%) were males and 40 cases (38.09%) were
females with a male: female ratio of 1.62: 1.
19Gheibiet al (2008) observed the male to female
ratio as 1.67:1 in a study of 227 cases. Our 19
observation is similar to that of Gheibiet al .
20Khatuaet al postulated that the factors regulating
the synthesis of gamma globulins are probably
situated on the X chromosome. Presence of one X
chromosome in the male infant thus confers less
immunological protection compared to female 21counterpart. Singh stated that male infants are
around 4 times at increased risk to develop sepsis
compared to females. Term male infants have an
approximately two fold higher incidence of
septicemia than term females
17According to the study by Jyothi P et al , etiology
of the 131 isolates included Gram-negative bacilli
(73/131, 55.7%) and Gram-positive cocci (58/131,
44.3%). Klebsiella spp. (30.5%) and coagulase-
negative Staphylococci (CONS) (27.5%) were the
most common Gram-negative and Gram-positive
organisms respectively.
1Gandhi S et al studies observations are that E.coli
(21.25%) was the most common isolate,
Staphylococcus aureus (20%) and Klebsiella
pneumoniae (20%) were isolated in equal
proportion. The next isolate was CoNS (11.25%).
The observations of present study correlate well 1 22
with the study by Gandhi S et al . Freeman et al
reported a rise in CONS septicemia in neonates
from 25% to 68.8% during 1975-1982 at their
hospital. Data from a tertiary care hospital in India
for year 2001-2002 revealed that CONS were the
commonest gram positive bacteria isolated from 23
cases of neonatal septicemia.
24Although in a study by Baumgart S et al , CONS
were found to be the most frequent blood 25contaminant; Hammerberg et al stated that after
the careful cleaning of venipuncture site, the
growth of CONS in blood culture of specimens of
premature neonates indicates bacteremia rather
than the skin contaminant in the vast majority of
cases.
Dr. Vaibhav V.Rajhans, et.al : A bacteriological study of sepsis in neonates using BacT/ALERT and miniAPI at a tertiary care centre
232National Journal of Basic Medical Sciences | Volume 7 | Issue 4 | 2017
In the present study, 6 (8.57%) strains of
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) were 26 27isolated. Guhaet al and Movahedianet al isolated
16.2% and 36% P. aeruginosa in their studies;
respectively. Pseudomonas infection is rarely 28
perinatally acquired however, it is among the
more common gram-negative organisms causing 29nosocomial sepsis in NICU patients.
Prior to antibiotic era, the mortality from
septicemia was 90% but it declined to 24%-58% 30after antibiotics came into use. The varying
microbiological pattern of neonatal septicemia
warrants the need for an outgoing review of
causative organisms and their antibiotic sensitivity
pattern. The inability to be certain of infection,
coupled with non- specific signs of life threatening
illness in neonates have resulted in widespread use
of antibiotics, aggravating the problem of antibiotic
resistance.
17Jyothi P et al observed that Gram-positive isolates
had sensitivity of 91% to Linezolid, 68% to
Tetracycline, 64% to Piperacillin / Tazobactam,
Erythromycin, and 52% to Ciprofloxacin.
13Ghanshyamet al reported that 50% of the
Klebsiellaand E. coli isolates were sensitive to 27
Cefotaxime. A study by Movahedianet al revealed
a very high degree of resistance in gram negative
organisms not only to commonly used antibiotics,
but also predominantly to broad spectrum 19cephalosporins. Gheibiet al reported high
resistance to Cefotaxime (67.5%), Ceftriaxone
(65.3%) and Ceftazidime (64.3%) among gram
negative organisms.
17Jyothi P et al observed that best overall sensitivity
among Gram-negative isolates was to Imipenem
(93%), followed by Amikacin (52%) and
Netilmicin (41%).
Although positive blood culture is the gold
standard in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis; in the
absence of proof of sepsis, many clinicians and
even some neonatologists feel obliged to continue
antibiotics for a full 10 days course. If the baby is
not infected he or she is being subjected to
unnecessary treatment. There is also danger of
removing useful or susceptible organisms and
encouraging resistant ones. If this occurs we shall
reach a stage to go on to use more expensive
antibiotics, or we have no more chance to use new 27
drug combinations.
Strict infection control in neonatal units, hand
washing combined with judicious policy for
antibiotic therapy are the main solution to this
problem. It will be important, however, to continue
surveillance of neonatal sepsis in order to follow
closely changes in trends and risk factors, to obtain
information for empiric antibiotic therapy and to
react rapidly in case of major changes in
susceptibility patterns and occurrence of 27outbreaks.
LIMITATION OF THE STUDY:
This is an observational study. As the study group
was restricted to neonates only, sample volume for
blood culture was a crucial issue. Neonates
admitted in the hospital were subjected to various
investigations under biochemistry, microbiology
and pathology (hematology) lab. As sample
collection is not that easy in neonates, mostly due to
small size of blood vessels and most neonates being
investigated are underweight. Multiple pricking is
not advisable hence blood collected in single prick
was distributed for three labs as biochemistry,
microbiology and pathology (hematology). As
sample received in microbiology was less in
volume, it was subjected only for automated blood
culture system; conventional blood culture system
being excluded from the study. And for the very
same reason, comparison of blood culture by
conventional and modern system was not possible.
Dr. Vaibhav V.Rajhans, et.al : A bacteriological study of sepsis in neonates using BacT/ALERT and miniAPI at a tertiary care centre
233National Journal of Basic Medical Sciences | Volume 7 | Issue 4 | 2017
CONCLUSION:
Total blood culture positivity rate was 44.58%. By
using BacT/ALERT 3D 60, 65.71% blood culture
positivity was observed within 24 hours incubation
and bottles flagged positive within 48 hours were
84.28%.
All 70 positive blood cultures were monobacterial.
Amongst gram positive bacteria CoNS and in Gram
negative bacteria E.coli were predominant. E.coli
isolates showed maximum susceptibility to
Piperacillin + Tazobactum combination and least
susceptible to Ampicillin. CoNS were maximum
susceptible to Vancomycin and Quinupristin -
Dalfopristin while least susceptible to Penicillin.
Time for detection of positivity by BacT/ALERT in
blood cultures was short. Both these systems, the
BacT/ALERT 3D 60 and the miniAPI, were
efficient, less time consuming and labor saving
which is essential for the clinician and more
importantly for the patient.
REFERENCES:
1. Gandhi S, Ranjan K, Ranjan N et al. Incidence of neonatal sepsis in tertiary care hospital: An overview. Int J Med SciPublic Health. 2013, 2(3):548-552.
2. Pauli I, Shekhawat P, Kehl S, et al. Early Detection of Bacteremia in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Using the New BACTEC System, Journal of Perinatology. 1999; 19(2):127–131
3. Kennedy GT, Barr JG, Goldsmith C. Detection of bacteremia by the continuously monitoring BacT/Alert system, J ClinPathol. 1995;48: 912-914
4. Tarai B, Das P, Kumar D et al. Comparative evaluation of paired blood culture (aerobic/aerobic) and single blood culture, along with clinical importance in catheter
versus peripheral line at a tertiary care hospital. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2012;30:187-92
5. Freney J, Herve C, Desmonceaux M et al. Description and Evaluation of the Semiautomated 4-Hour ATB 32E Method for Identification of Members of the Family Enterobacteriaceae. Journal of clinical micro.1991;138-141
6. Current Blood Culture Methods and Systems: Clinical Concepts, Technology, and Interpretation of Results, Weinstein MP, CID.1996;23:40-46
7. JeevaSankar M, Agarwal R, DeorariAKetal. Sepsis in the Newborn, AIIMS- NICU protocols. 2008;1-18
8. Scaffer, Avery. Scaffer's and Avery's Diseases of the newborn,Saunder's publication, 6th Ed. Chapter 37; p. 350
9. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Principles and Procedures for Blood Cultures; Approved Guidelines, M47-A, Vol. 27 No. 17, Replaces M47-P, Vol. 26 No. 31; p.1-53
10. Koneman EW, Allen SD, Janda WM et al. Colour Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology, 6th Edition, Lippincott Williams and Willkins; p. 97-105.
11. Lawn.J.E, Cousens.S, Zupan.J, Neonatal survival steering team.4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? The Lancet, 2005;365, (9462), 891 – 900.
12. Park K. Park's Textbook of preventable and social medicine, 22nd Edition, Banasidas Bhanot publishers, Chapter 10, p.523
13. Ghanshyam DK, Ramachandran VG, Gupta P. Bacteriological analysis of blood culture isolates from neonates in a tertiary care
Dr. Vaibhav V.Rajhans, et.al : A bacteriological study of sepsis in neonates using BacT/ALERT and miniAPI at a tertiary care centre
234
Dr. Vaibhav V.Rajhans, et.al : A bacteriological study of sepsis in neonates using BacT/ALERT and miniAPI at a tertiary care centre
National Journal of Basic Medical Sciences | Volume 7 | Issue 4 | 2017
hospital in India. J Health Popul Nutr 2002; 20(4): 343-7
14. Anantha Krishnan S, Gunasekaran D. Etiology and risk factors for early onset neonatal sepsis. IJMM. 2009; 27: 279
15. Gandhi S, Ranjan K, Ranjan N, et al. Incidence of neonatal sepsis in tertiary care hospital: An overview. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2013; 2(3): 548-552.
16. Wadud A, Khalil M, Shamsuzzaman A et al. Bacteriological profiles of Blood culture isolates by BacT/ALERT 3D automated system, Journal of ShaheedSuhrawardy Medical College.2009; 1(2):306-309.
17. Jyothi P, Basavaraj MC, Basavaraj PV. Bacteriological profile of neonatal septicemia and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the isolates. J Nat ScBiol Med. 2013;4: 306-9
18. Haseeb M, Khan ST, Shoeb Khan et al. Epidemiology clinical features and outcome of neonatal sepsis at tertiary care hospital in Sangli district of Maharashtra, INDIA: A descriptive study, Medplus- International Medical Journal. 2014; 1(7): 351-353
19. Gheibi S, Fakoor Z, Karamyyar M, et al. Coagulase negative staphylococcus: the most common cause of neonatal septicemia in Urmia, Iran. Iran J Pediatr. 2008; 18: 237-43.
20. Khatua SP, Das AK, Chattergee BD et al. Neonatal septicaemia. Indian J Pediatr. 1986; 53:509-14.
21. Singh MB. Perinatal infections. In: Care of the newborn. 6thEd. New Delhi: Sagar publications. 2004. p.196-216.
22. Freeman J, Platt R, Sidebottom DG et al. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcal
bacteremia in the changing neonatal intensive care unit population. Is there an epidemic? JAMA. 1987; 258: 2548-52.
23. Jain A, Roy I, Gupta M et al. Prevalence of Extended Spectrum β-Lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria in septicemic neonates in a tertiary care hospital. J Med Microbiol. 2003; 52: 421-5.
24. Baumgart S, Hall SE, Campos JM et al. S e p s i s w i t h c o a g u l a s e - n e g a t i v e staphylococci in critically ill newborn. Am J Dis Child. 1983; 137: 461-3.
25. Hammerberg O, Blalkowska-Hobrzanska H, Gregson D et al. Comparison of blood cultures with corresponding venipuncture site cultures of specimens from hospitalised premature neonates. J Pediatr. 1992; 120: 120-4
26. Guha DK, Jaspal D, Das K et al. Outcome of neonatal septicemia- A clinical and bacteriological profile. Indian Pediatr. 1978; 15: 423-7
27. Movahedian AH, Moniri R, Mosayebi Z. Bacterial culture of Neonatal Sepsis. Iranian J Publ Health. 2006; 33: 84-9.
28. Ruvalo C, Bauer CR. Intrauterinely acquired Pseudomonas infection in the neonate. Clin. Pediatr. 1982; 21: 664–7
29. Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA et al. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics. 2002; 110: 285–91
30. Agnihotri N, Kaistha N, Gupta V. Antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates from neonatal septicemia. J Infect Dis. 2004; 57: 273-5.
Received on 28/02/2017 Revised on 06/04/2017 Accepted on 06/06/2017