valley central school district proposed budget 2013-2014

7/28/2019 Valley Central School District Proposed Budget 2013-2014

1/88

ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

JUNE 10, 2013 1:00 P.M. - 8:00 P.M.

Valley Central

School District

Proposed Budget

2013-2014

VOTER REGISTRATION


2/88

INDEXPage

Letter to Residents .................................................................. i-ii

Voter Qualifications & Information ........................................... iii

Proposed Budget for 2013-2014.............................................. 1A - 6

BOARD OF EDUCATION

2012-2013

TermExpiration

President Robert W. Santo 201415 Chandler Circle, Montgomery, NY 12549

Vice President Elizabeth Blashka 2014102 Washington Avenue, Montgomery, NY 12549

Member Joy D. Crist 201555 Crist Lane, Walden, NY 12586

Member Chris Ann Harper-OConnor 201320 Van Dale Court, Walden, NY 12586

Member Sonia Lewis 2015815 Homestead Avenue, Maybrook, NY 12543

MemberSteven H. Mosenson 2013114 Coleman Road, Walden, NY 12586

Member Kevin Reidy 2013103 Camp Orange Road, Middletown, NY 10941


3/88

June 2013

Dear Resident,

In the late 90s, the New York State Legislature redefined how school budgets are

presented to ensure a better understanding of how tax dollars are spent in local school

districts. As a result, Valley Central, along with all other school districts, presents its

expenses in three parts with comparative budget figures from the previous year. This

format allows voters to view the areas of program, administration and capital against the

costs from the prior year.

As you review the attached budget, you can see areas that have increased and

decreased from the previous year and see the comparative difference among the three

areas. A Property Tax Report Card must be prepared and filed with the State and local

newspapers. The Six-Day Budget Notice is also required by the State and will be mailed

to all District residents following the Budget Hearing.

For this re-vote of the 2013-2014 budget the Board is recommending a budget under thetax cap. This has meant additional cuts to programs and personnel of about $3 Million

which would have been preserved by piercing the cap in the first vote (May 21). If the

budget fails this time, the increase to the levy must be zero causing an additional $2

Million in cuts over what has already been cut from the instructional and extracurricular

program.

Since the first proposed budget was defeated, the Board of Education had three options:

they could resubmit the budget in its original form, submit a revised budget, or adopt a

contingency budget. The Board of Education chose to submit a revised budget that is

below the tax cap. If voters fail to approve the proposed budget on the second vote, the

District must adopt a Contingency Budget since two votes are the maximum permitted

under current legislation.

In a Contingency Budget, the levy for the Contingency Budget year must be zero and

may not exceed the levy in the preceding year. Specifically, for the proposed 2013-2014

budget, the Contingency Budget would be reduced by an additional $2,124,769 due to

reduction in the use of fund balance. This would mean additional reductions to staffing

and programs. Please note that the new proposed 2013-2014 tax levy is below the state

tax cap and therefore requires a 50% majority to pass.

Thi ' b d t t ill b h ld T d J 18th f 7 00 t 9 00


4/88


5/88

VOTER QUALIFICATIONS & INFORMATIONA person is entitled to vote at any school meeting (Annual District Election and Budget Vote)

for the election of school district officers and upon all other matters which may be brought beforesuch meeting, who is a qualified registered voter in the school district; in order to register, theapplicant must meet the following criteria:

Be a citizen of the United States

Be eighteen (18) years of age or older on June 18, 2013

Be a resident within the district for a period of not less than thirty (30) days prior tothe Annual District Election and Budget Vote at which he or she offers to vote

No person shall have the right to register for or vote at any school meeting or election whowould not be qualified to register for or vote at an election in accordance with the provisions ofSection 5-106 of the Election Law. This includes convicted felons and those adjudged mentallyincompetent by a court.

Qualified voters may vote on any question brought before any annual or special school

meeting. It is not essential that a person be a taxpayer to vote on propositions for raising money bytax on the district. For your convenience, new voter registration is set for Monday, June 10 between1:00 and 8:00 p.m. at our elementary schools.

Any resident who registered and voted at an annual or special district meeting or generalelection within the last four (4) calendar years will be eligible to vote on Tuesday, June 18, 2013.

Questions on voter qualifications can be directed to the Valley Central School District

Administration Office at 457-2400, ext. 18122.

-iii-


6/88


7/88

CODE BOARD OF EDUCATION 2012-2013

BUDGET

2013-2014

BUDGET

Board of Education

Expenditures incurred by the Board for supplies, travel, meetings, and

conferences.

District Clerk

Expenditures for supplies, postage, servicing of machines and portion

of clerical salary in support of the District Clerks office.

District Meeting

New voting machines required add substantial costs. Expenditures for

printing, advertising, payments to election officials, absentee ballots, and

supplies.Total cost: BOARD OF EDUCATION

CODE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION 2012-2013

BUDGET

2013-2014

BUDGET

Superintendent

Salaries of the Superintendent, Superintendents Assistant and negotiated

benefits, equipment, other expenses, and supplies.

Assistant Superintendent for Business

Salaries of the Assistant Superintendent for Business, clerical and

accounting staff, contractual expenses, and supplies.

Auditing Services

Annual Audit by External Auditor, Internal Auditor, and stipend for

Internal Claims Auditor.

District Treasurer

Stipend of Treasurer.

Receiver of TaxesThe T/o Montgomery employs the Receiver of Taxes, but the District

pays a portion of the salary for tax collections in the Towns of Crawford,

Wallkill, Hamptonburgh, and Shawangunk.

Total cost: SUPERINTENDENT AND BUSINESS OFFICE

2012-2013

BUDGET

Legal Services

School District Attorney and other legal fees.

Personnel Administration

Salaries of Assistant Superintendent for Pupil Services and Human

Resources and clerical staff, expenditures for supplies, recruiting costs,

and advertising.

Public Information and Services

A1310 535,130

A1040 1,000

A1060 63,000

77,900

A1240 319,090

A1010 13,900

Valley Central School District Revote

ADOPTED BUDGET (6/3/13)

13,900

A1330 7,300

939,070

A1320 61,500

A1325 16,050

189,000

A1430 343,560

CODE STAFF

A1420

A1480 16,000

511,103

61,500

16,530

7,500

-

41,000

54,900

319,357

915,990

189,000

355,608

8,000

2013-2014

BUDGET


8/88



CENTRAL SERVICES 2012-2013

OPERATION and MAINTENANCE BUDGET

Operations of Plant

Salaries of Superintendent of Buildings and Grounds and full-time and

part-time custodial staff (38), equipment, supplies, other expenses,

utilities, professional and technical services, and district-wide service

contracts.

A1621 Maintenance of Plant 688,135

Salaries of full-time and part-time maintenance (5) and grounds staff (3).

Printing suppliesCosts for printing elementary report cards, forms, and district-wide

stationery. Printing student handbooks deleted here.

Data Processing - BOCES

Computer costs for attendance, student scheduling, test scoring, secondary

report cards, and related hardware costs.

Total cost: CENTRAL SERVICES

2012-2013

BUDGET

Insurance

Insurance premiums for fire, auto, liability, vandalism, and student

accident.

School Association Dues

Costs of memberships in state, regional, and county associations.

Refund of Property Taxes

Refund of prior years collected taxes due to reductions in assessments

caused by tax grievances.Administrative Charges - BOCES

Districts portion of BOCES administrative expenses.

Dorm Authority/Rent and Capital Construction Charge

Districts share of the cost of operating and maintaining BOCES

buildings.

Total cost: SPECIAL ITEMS

INSTRUCTION and STAFF DEVELOPMENT 2012-2013

Supervision of Regular Instruction BUDGET

Curriculum Development and Supervision

Salaries of Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction, and

clerical staff in administrator's offices, equipment , supplies, and

substantial portion of district staff development.

A2020 Supervision of Regular Instruction 3,002,586

CODE

A1620 4,181,950

5,253,960

CODE SPECIAL ITEMS

A1670.45 26,875

A1680.49 357,000

A1964

&

A1980

50,000

A1981 574,000

A1910 259,900

A1920 13,500

CODE

A2010 478,450

A1989 -

897,400

4,119,673

646,583

15,000

50,000

591,362

-

40,650

273,520

2013-2014

BUDGET

281,900

938,262

479,510

2,818,777

2013-2014

BUDGET

2013-2014

BUDGET

5,080,426


9/88



2012-2013

REGULAR CLASSROOM BUDGET

Salaries of Grades K-6 Teachers

Budget reflects cost of teachers with contractual increases. Estimated

10.0 teacher reductions here.

Salaries of Grades 7-12 Teachers

Budget reflects costs of secondary teachers with contractual increases.

Estimated 12.5 teacher reductions here.

Substitute Teaching and Home Teaching

Reflects costs of substitutes.

Regular Classroom Paraprofessionals

Salaries for Paraprofessionals.Sick-Day Incentives

Attendance incentive for instructional staff.

Classroom Supplies, Equipment and Other Expenses

Supplies, equipment, and contractual costs for instructional purposes.

Foster & Tuition

Tuition paid to other school districts for Valley Central students in foster

care outside of the district..

Textbooks

Includes costs of textbooks for all students.

BOCES

Includes testing, tuition, and some staff development.

Special Education

Salaries of special education teachers and paraprofessionals, equipment,

supplies, special education BOCES services, residential and contracted

tuition, and other expenses.

BOCES - Occupational EducationEducational services for students who attend the vocational programs at

BOCES.

Total cost: REGULAR CLASSROOM

A2110.12 12,063,747

A2110.13 13,113,456

CODE

A2110.18 37,000

A2110 648,135

A2110.14 636,580

A2110.16 1,649,900

A2110.49 183,000

A2250 12,139,322

A2110.471 150,000

A2110.48 300,630

A2280.49 870,000

41,791,770

150,000

300,630

198,640

14,035,631

870,000

40,171,709

10,056,625

12,367,344

368,915

1,271,351

37,000

515,573

2013-2014

BUDGET


10/88



2012-2013

BUDGET

Special Schools

Costs to operate Evening H.S., CAS.

Total cost: SPECIAL SCHOOLS

2012-2013

BUDGET

School Library and Audio Visual

Salaries of librarians and clerical staff, library and A/V equipment and

supplies and audio, video and computer repairs.

Computer Assisted InstructionComputer hardware/software and State aided computer hardware/software

expenditures.

Total cost: INSTRUCTIONAL MEDIA

2012-2013

BUDGET

Attendance

Salaries of attendance teacher, clerical staff, supplies, equipment, andother expenses.

Guidance

Salaries for guidance counselors, clerical staff, equipment, supplies and

other expenses.

Health Services/School Nurses

Salaries of clerical staff and nurses (10), plus additional time for school

nurses at the Districts non public schools, equipment, supplies, and other

expenses. District also pays for health services of district resident private

school students.Psychological Services

Salaries of psychologists and clerical staff, equipment, supplies, and other

expenses.

Educational Related Support Services

Salaries of student assistance counselors, occupational and physical

therapists, supplies and other expenses.

Speech and Social Work Services

Salaries of speech teachers, supplies, and other expenses.

Pupil Personnel Services - Special Schools

Salaries of Assistant Superintendent for Pupil Services and Human

Resources, Director and Assistant Director of Special Education, office

staff, equipment, supplies, and other expenses.

Total cost: PUPIL PERSONNEL SERVICES

CODE SPECIAL SCHOOLS

A2330

CODE INSTRUCTIONAL MEDIA

A2610

107,000

107,000

1,509,419

CODE PUPIL PERSONNEL SERVICES

788,079

A2630 721,340

A2815 880,069

A2820 867,500

A2805 83,395

A2810 1,035,023

A2830 423,950

4,750,599

A2823 249,612

A2825 1,211,050

158,520

78,663

1,149,551

966,334

831,714

2013-2014

BUDGET

158,520

756,050

2013-2014

BUDGET

393,501

805,982

287,614

1,185,414

454,140

4,609,861

2013-2014

BUDGET


11/88



2012-2013

BUDGET

Co-Curricular Activities

Salaries of chaperones, class advisors and advisors to Yearbook, Student

Newspaper, Student Government, Plays, etc.

Interscholastic Sports, Grades 7-12

Salaries of coaches for interscholastic sports, supplies, uniforms,

equipment reconditioning, officials, dues, entry fees, and expenses for

pool.

Total cost:

CO-CURRICULAR AND INTERSCHOLASTIC SPORTS

2012-2013

BUDGET

District Transportation

Fuel costs.

Contract Transportation

Cost for transportation of pupils to and from the public, non-public and

special education schools.

Total cost: TRANSPORTATION

2012-2013

BUDGET

State Retirement

Civil service employees' retirement costs. A portion of expense paid from

district reserve.

Teachers Retirement

Districts share of retirement plan for professional staff.

Social SecurityDistricts share of Social Security and Medicare for employees.

Workers Compensation Insurance

Premiums paid by the District as required by law. District is a member

of a self-funded plan.

Unemployment Insurance

An expense required by State and Federal Law.

Health Insurance

Districts share for health and life insurance premiums. District is a

member of a self-funded plan as well as two other plans.

Dental and Vision Insurance

Districts share for dental and vision plan for employees.

A9070 Accumulated Sick And Vacation Days

Buyback of accumulated retiree sick and vacation days.

Total cost: EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

155,000

A2855 587,500

CODE CO-CURRICULAR and INTERSCHOLASTIC SPORTS

A2850

A5510 630,500

A5540.4 5,424,800

742,500

CODE PUPIL TRANSPORTATION

A9010.8 1,100,000

A9020.8 4,872,140

6,055,300

CODE EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

A9050.8 365,000

A9060.8 9,450,348

A9030.8 3,717,274

A9040.8 464,836

A9065.8 629,526

20,599,124

2013-2014

BUDGET

417,062

159,650

517,090

170,000

1,990,022

5,718,760

3,483,558

507,394

2013-2014

BUDGET

365,000

9,453,893

576,712

6,290,420

22,205,717

2013-2014

BUDGET

661,915

5,628,505


12/88



CODE DEBT SERVICE, CAPITAL PROJECTS, BORROWING COSTS and

INTERFUND TRANSFERS

2012-2013

BUDGET

2013-2014

BUDGET

Principal and Interest

Long term debt service and short-term borrowing should State Aid

payments fail to be made by NYS.

Transfer to Special Aid Funds and Cafeteria Fund

Transfer to Federal Fund for the Summer Handicapped Program, and

continued support for student food service.

Transfer to Capital Funds

Not currently used.

Total cost: DEBT SERVICE, CAPITAL PROJECTS, and INTERFUND

TRANSFERS

Total cost: GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATION

A9710 2,980,000

90,165,138

A9950.9 -

3,270,000

290,000A9901.95

3,003,000

310,000

-

3,313,000

89,364,363


13/88

Valley Central School District

2013-2014 Fiscal Accountability Report


14/88

SDL: 4490 LEA: 441301060000

The New York State School Report CardFiscal Accountability Supplement

forValle Central School District Mont omerNew York State Education Law and the Commissioner's Regulations require the attachment of the NYS School

Report Card to the public school district budget proposal. The regulations require that certain expenditure ratios

for general education and special education students be reported and compared with ratios for similar districtsand all public schools. The required ratios for this district are reported below.

2010-2011 School Year General Education Special Education

This

School

District

Similar

District

Group

Similar District Group Description: Average Need/Resource Capacity

Instructional Expenditures

Pupils

Expenditures Per Pupil

$47,871,878

4,729

$10,123

$18,377,050

775

$23,712

$7,820,663,210

798,424

$9,795

$3,172,283,304

110,978

$28,585


Pupils



Pupils


$29,473,160,406

2,688,528

$10,963

$12,260,104,540

412,226

$29,741

Instructional Expenditures for General Education are K-12 expenditures for classroom instruction (excluding Special Education) plus a pro-ration of building level administrative and instructional support expenditures. These expenditures include amounts for instruction of stu-

dents with disabilities in a general-education setting. District expenditures, such as transportation, debt service and district-wide adminis-tration are not included.

The pupil count for General Education is K-12 average daily membership plus K-12 pupils for whom the district pays tuition to anotherschool district. This number represents all pupils, including those classified as having disabilities and those not classified, excluding onlystudents with disabilities placed out of district. For districts in which a county jail is located, this number includes incarcerated youth towhom the district must provide an education program.

Instructional Expenditures for Special Education are K-12 expenditures for students with disabilities (including summer special educationexpenditures) plus a proration of building-level administrative and instructional support expenditures. District expenditures, such as trans-portation, debt service and district-wide administration are not included.

The pupil count for Special Education is a count of K-12 students with disabilities for the 2010-11 school year plus students for whom thedistrict receives tuition from another district plus students for whom the district pays tuition to another district. Students attending the Stateschools at Rome and Batavia, private placements and out-of-state placements are included.

Total of All

School

Districts in

NY State

Instructional Expenditures Per Pupil is the simple arithmetic ratio of Instructional Expenditures to Pupils. The total cost of instruction for stu-dents with disabilities may include both general- and special-education expenditures. Special-education services provided in the general-education classroom may benefit students not classified as having disabilities.


15/88

SDL: 4490 LEA: 441301060000

The New York State School Re ort CardInformation about Students with Disabilities

forValley Central School District (Montgomery)

New York State Education Law and the Commissioner's Regulations require the attachment of the NYS School

Report Card to the public school district budget proposal. The regulations require reporting students with disabi-lities by the percent of time they are in general education classrooms and the classification rate of students with

disabilities. These data are to be compared with percentages for similar districts and all public schools. The re-

quired percentages for this district are reported below.

Student Counts as of

October 4, 2011This School District

Total of All SchoolDistricts in NY State

Student Placement --

Percent of Time Inside

Regular Classroom

Count ofStudents with

Disabilities

Percentage ofStudents with

Disabilities


Disabilities

80% or more

40% to 79%

Less than 40%

Separate Settings

314

164

229

31

41.0%

21.4%

29.9%

4.0%

57.3%

11.7%

22.1%

6.1%

The source data for the statistics in this table were reported through the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) andverified in Verification Report 5. The counts are numbers of students reported in the least restrictive environment categoriesfor school-age programs (ages 6-21) on October 4, 2011. The percentages represent the amount of time students withdisabilities are in general-education classrooms, regardless of the amount and cost of special education services theyreceive. Rounding of percentage values may cause them to sum to a number slightly different from 100%.

School-age Students with Disabilities Classification Rate

2011-12 School Year This SchoolDistrict

Total of All SchoolDistricts in NY State

Special Ed Classification Rate 12.8%

This rate is a ratio of the count of school-age students with disabilities (ages 4-21) to the total enrollment of all school-agestudents in the school district, including students who are parentally placed in nonpublic schools located in the schooldistrict. The numerator includes all school-age students for whom a district has Committee on Special Education (CSE)responsibility to ensure the provision of special education services. The denominator includes all school-age students whoreside in the district. In the case of parentally placed students in nonpublic schools, it includes the number of students whoattend the nonpublic schools located in the school district Source data are drawn from the SIRS and from the Basic

15.2%

Other Settings 28 3.7% 2.8%

Similar DistrictGroup


Disabilities

Similar DistrictGroup

12.1%

58.1%

18.8%

16.7%

4.1%

2.3%


16/88

Valley Central School District

2011-2012 Report Card


17/88

The New York StateReport Card

201112

The New York State Report Card is an

important part of the Board of Regents effort to

raise learning standards for all students. It

provides information to the public on

school/district enrollment and staff, student

performance, and other measures of school anddistrict performance. Knowledge gained from

the report card on a schools or districts

strengths and weaknesses can be used to

improve instruction and services to students.

State assessments are designed to help ensure

that all students reach high learning standards.

They show whether students are getting the

knowledge and skills they need to succeed at the

elementary, middle, and commencement levels

and beyond. The State requires that students

who are not making appropriate progress toward

the standards receive academic supports.

This report includes:1 Profile

This section showscomprehensive data relevant tothis schools or districts

learning environment, includinginformation about enrollment,attendance and suspensions,and staff.

2Student PerformanceThis section shows student

performance on standardizedassessments at the elementary,middle, and commencementlevels.

3Student OutcomesThis section shows outcomesfor graduates and non-

completers, including post-graduation plans of completers.

District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

(MONTGOMERY)

District ID 44-13-01-06-0000

Superintendent RICHARD HOOLEY

Telephone (845) 457-2400

Grades PK-12, UE, US

Need/ResourceCapacity Category Average Need Districts


18/88

1 Profile

Enrollment

Pre-K

Kindergarten

Grade 1

Grade 2

Grade 3

Grade 4

Grade 5

Grade 6

Ungraded Elementary

Grade 7

Grade 8

Grade 9

Grade 10

Grade 11

Grade 12

Ungraded Secondary

Total K12

Average Class Size

Common Branch

Grade 8

English

Mathematics

Science

Social Studies

Enrollment InformationEnrollment counts are as of Basic EducationalData System (BEDS) day, which is typicallythe first Wednesday of October of the schoolyear. Students who attend BOCES programson a part-time basis are included in a schoolsand district's enrollment. Students who attend

BOCES on a full-time basis or who are placedfull time by the district in an out-of-districtplacement are not included in a schools ordistrict's enrollment. The state publicenrollment includes public school districts,charter schools, and NYSED-operatedprograms. Students classified by districts as"pre-first" are included in first grade counts.Kindergarten and Pre-K counts include half-and full-day students.

Average Class SizeInformation

Average Class Size is the total registration inspecified classes divided by the number ofthose classes with registration. CommonBranch refers to self-contained classes inGrades 16.

District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) District ID 44-13-01-06-0000

200910 201011 201112

86

327

357

351

340

370

374

372

4

395

378443

378

387

364

13

4853

87

333

324

354

340

339

370

374

4

386

387435

418

355

375

16

4810

86

314

322

319

350

323

341

371

25

370

388421

390

389

334

26

4683

200910 201011 201112

21

23

23

20

23

22

23

23

20

24

22

24

24

24

24


19/88

1 Profile

Demographic Factors

# % # % # %

Eligible for Free Lunch

Reduced Price Lunch

Limited English Proficient

Racial/Ethnic Origin

American Indian or Alaska Native

Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

Asian or Native Hawaiian/OtherPacific Islander

White

Multiracial

Attendance and Suspensions

# % # % # %

Annual Attendance Rate

Student Suspensions

Demographic FactorsInformationEligible for Free Lunch andReduced-PriceLunch percentages are determined bydividing the number of approved lunchapplicants by the Basic Educational DataSystem (BEDS) enrollment in full-dayKindergarten through Grade 12.

Attendance andSuspensions Information

Annual Attendance Rate is determined bydividing the schools (or district's) total actualattendance by the total possible attendancefor a school year. A schools (or district's)actual attendance is the sum of the numberof students in attendance on each day theschool (or district's schools) was open duringthe school year. Possible attendance is thesum of the number of enrolled students whoshould have been in attendance on each daythe school (or schools) was open during the

school year. The statesAnnual AttendanceRate is a weighted average of all district-level attendance rates.

Student Suspension rate is determined bydividing the number of students who weresuspended from school (not including in-


200910 201011 201112

826

366

45

16

505

720

98

3513

1

17%

8%

1%

0%

10%

15%

2%

72%

0%

847

358

46

16

508

792

90

3396

8

18%

7%

1%

0%

11%

16%

2%

71%

0%

821

381

38

15

488

788

86

3269

37

18%

8%

1%

0%

10%

17%

2%

70%

1%

200809 200910 201011

310

95%

6% 323

95%

7% 299

95%

6%


20/88

1 Profile

Teacher Qualifications

Total Number of Teachers

Percent with No Valid TeachingCertificate

Percent Teaching Out of Certification

Percent with Fewer than Three Years of

Experience

Percentage with Masters Degree Plus30 Hours or Doctorate

Total Number of Core Classes

Percent Not Taught by Highly QualifiedTeachers in This School*

Percent Not Taught by Highly QualifiedTeachers in This District**

Percent Not Taught by Highly QualifiedTeachers in High-Poverty SchoolsStatewide

Percent Not Taught by Highly QualifiedTeachers in Low-Poverty SchoolsStatewide

Total Number of Classes

Percent Taught by Teachers WithoutAppropriate Certification

*Not available at the district or statewide level.**Not available for charter schools or at the statewide level.

Teacher Turnover Rate

Staff Counts

Turnover Rate of Teachers withFewer than Five Years of Experience

Turnover Rate of All Teachers

Teacher Qualifications

InformationThePercent Teaching Out of Certification forpublic schools is the percent doing so on morethan an incidental basis; that is, the percentteaching for more than five periods per weekoutside certification.

Core Classes are primarily K6 common branch,English, mathematics, science, social studies,art, music, and foreign languages. To be HighlyQualified, a teacher must have at least aBachelors degree, be certified to teach in thesubject area or otherwise in accordance withstate standards, and show subject mattercompetency.In public schools, a teacher who taught oneclass outside of the certification area(s) iscounted as Highly Qualified provided that 1) theteacher had been determined by the school or

district through the HOUSSE process or otherstate-accepted methods to have demonstratedacceptable subject knowledge and teachingskills and 2) the class in question was not thesole assignment reported. Credit for incidentalteaching does not extend beyond a singleassignment. Independent ofHighly QualifiedTeacherstatus, any assignment for which ateacher did not hold a valid certificate stillregisters as teaching out of certification.

In charter schools, a teacher is counted asHighly Qualified if the teacher has at least aBachelors degree, is certified to teach, andshows subject matter competency. Enablinglegislation considers charter school teachers tobe certified if they hold any valid teachingcertificate. Enabling legislation also permits upto 30 percent (with a maximum of five) of charterschool teachers to be without certification and tobe considered Highly Qualified if they meet all

remaining criteria.

High-poverty and low-poverty schools are thoseschools in the upper and lower quartiles,respectively, for percentage of students eligiblefor a free or reduced-price lunch.

Teacher Turnover Rate


200910 201011 201112

403

0%

0%

3%

35%

981

N/A

0%

6%

1%

1467

1%

382

0%

0%

3%

41%

881

N/A

0%

5%

0%

1382

0%

371

0%

0%

2%

46%

873

N/A

0%

7%

1%

1340

0%

200809 200910 201011

18%

8%

36%

14%

23%

12%

2009 10 2010 11 2011 12


21/88

2 Student Performance

This section contains annual assessment data for students at the elementary, middle, and commencement levelsas well as the performance of secondary-level cohorts on standardized achievement assessments.

New York State Testing Program (NYSTP) Assessments

The New York State Testing Program assessments are administered in English language arts (ELA) and mathematics ingrades 3 through 8. The Performance Level Descriptors for these assessments are provided below:

English Language ArtsLevel 1: Below StandardStudent performance does not demonstrate an understanding of the English language arts knowledge and skills expected at this gradelevel.

Level 2: Meets Basic StandardStudent performance demonstrates a partial understanding of the English language arts knowledge and skills expected at this grade level.

Level 3: Meets Proficiency StandardStudent performance demonstrates an understanding of the English language arts knowledge and skills expected at this grade level.

Level 4: Exceeds Proficiency StandardStudent performance demonstrates a thorough understanding of the English language arts knowledge and skills expected at this grade

level.

MathematicsLevel 1: Below StandardStudent performance does not demonstrate an understanding of the mathematics content expected at this grade level.

Level 2: Meets Basic StandardStudent performance demonstrates a partial understanding of the mathematics content expected at this grade level.

Level 3: Meets Proficiency StandardStudent performance demonstrates an understanding of the mathematics content expected at this grade level.

Level 4: Exceeds Proficiency Standard

Student performance demonstrates a thorough understanding of the mathematics content expected at this grade level.

New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA)

The New York State Alternate Assessments are administered in English language arts (ELA) and mathematics to ungradedstudents with severe cognitive disabilities whose ages are equivalent to graded students in grades 3 through 8 andsecondary level. They are administered in science to students with disabilities age equivalent to graded students in grades 4,8, and secondary level. And they are administered in social studies at the secondary level only.

New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Tests (NYSESLAT)

The New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Tests are administered in grades K through 12 to limitedEnglish proficient students.

Secondary Level Cohorts


2 St d t P f


22/88


100%

Results by

Student GroupPercentage scoring at level(s): Percentage scoring at level(s):

24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific IslanderWhite

Multiracial

Small Group Totals

General-Education Students

Students with Disabilities

English Proficient


Economically Disadvantaged

Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant


Results in Grade 3 English Language Arts

Percentage scoring at level(s):

2-4 3-4 4

NY State PublicPercentage scoring at level(s):

2-4 3-4 4

This District

2012 Mean Score: 6672011 Mean Score: 666

*Range: 644780 663780 694780

88% 91%

64% 61%

7% 5%

86% 87%

56% 56%

7% 5%

Number of Tested Students: 310 226 24300 202 15

201112

201011

201112 School Year 201011 School Year

TotalTested TotalTested

352 88% 64% 7% 330 91% 61% 5%

183

169

1

36

55

5253

2

8

290

62

350

2

121

231

352

91%

85%

83%

85%

89%

88%

95%

55%

77%

94%

88%

67%

62%

44%

58%

68%

75%

74%

18%

45%

74%

64%

8%

5%

0%

2%

9%

0%

8%

0%

2%

9%

7%

158

172

2

36

54

4233

1

7

271

59

326

4

110

220

1329

92%

90%

78%

89%

93%

100%

97%

63%

85%

94%

70%

53%

50%

63%

63%

43%

69%

24%

46%

69%

6%

3%

6%

2%

5%

14%

6%

0%

2%

6%

NOTESThe symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than f ive students,data for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students.

2 St d t P f


23/88


100%

Results by


24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino


Multiracial

Small Group Totals



English Proficient



Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant


Results in Grade 3 Mathematics


2-4 3-4 4


2-4 3-4 4

This District


*Range: 662770 684770 707770

97% 94%

70% 68%

14%21%

91% 91%

61% 60%

13% 13%


201112

201011



352 97% 70% 14% 330 94% 68% 21%

183

169

1

36

55

5253

2

8

290

62

350

2

121

231

352

96%

98%

83%

100%

98%

100%

99%

85%

92%

100%

97%

66%

73%

53%

55%

75%

63%

76%

42%

50%

80%

70%

15%

14%

0%

16%

16%

25%

18%

0%

8%

18%

14%

158

172

2

36

53

4234

1

7

271

59

326

4

110

220

1329

94%

95%

83%

91%

97%

100%

98%

78%

86%

98%

70%

67%

56%

58%

72%

71%

77%

27%

49%

78%

18%

23%

17%

11%

24%

14%

24%

7%

10%

26%




24/88


100%

Results by


24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino


Multiracial

Small Group Totals



English Proficient



Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant




2-4 3-4 4


2-4 3-4 4

This District


*Range: 637775 671775 722775

96% 94%

72% 58%

6% 1%

91% 92%

59% 57%

5% 2%


201112

201011



317 96% 72% 6% 336 94% 58% 1%

153

164

2

30

55

5223

2

9

264

53

314

3

111

206

1316

96%

96%

87%

100%

97%

89%

99%

81%

91%

99%

74%

70%

70%

67%

74%

67%

80%

32%

57%

80%

8%

4%

3%

4%

7%

0%

7%

0%

2%

8%

157

179

2

25

64

7238

9

265

71

334

2

118

218

1335

96%

93%

92%

92%

95%

100%

100%

75%

92%

96%

62%

55%

40%

50%

61%

89%

69%

20%

47%

64%

2%

1%

0%

0%

2%

0%

2%

0%

0%

2%




25/88


100%

Results by


24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino


Multiracial

Small Group Totals



English Proficient



Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant




2-4 3-4 4


2-4 3-4 4

This District


*Range: 636800 676800 707800

99% 98%

78% 75%

30% 26%

95% 94%

69% 67%

30% 27%


201112

201011


TotalTested

TotalTested

318 99% 78% 30% 335 98% 75% 26%

154

164

2

30

55

5224

2

9

265

53

314

4

111

207

1317

98%

99%

97%

100%

99%

100%

99%

96%

97%

100%

75%

80%

70%

76%

79%

78%

84%

49%

68%

83%

28%

32%

20%

18%

33%

56%

34%

8%

16%

37%

157

178

2

25

63

7238

9

264

71

333

2

118

217

1334

97%

98%

96%

95%

98%

100%

100%

90%

94%

100%

72%

77%

68%

75%

74%

100%

82%

48%

68%

78%

29%

23%

12%

24%

27%

56%

31%

7%

18%

30%




26/88


100%

Results by


24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

White

Multiracial

Small Group Totals



English Proficient



Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant


Results in Grade 4 Science


2-4 3-4 4


2-4 3-4 4

This District


Range: 45100 65100 85100

99% 99% 96% 94%

74%71%

97% 98%89% 88%

57% 52%


201112

201011


TotalTested

TotalTested

318 99% 96% 74% 330 99% 94% 71%

154

164

2

29

55

5225

2

9

264

54

314

4

113

205

1317

99%

98%

97%

100%

99%

100%

100%

94%

97%

100%

96%

96%

90%

98%

96%

100%

98%

85%

93%

98%

69%

79%

69%

67%

76%

78%

80%

48%

61%

81%

155

175

2

25

61

7235

9

261

69

328

2

117

213

1329

99%

98%

96%

95%

100%

100%

100%

94%

98%

99%

94%

94%

80%

92%

96%

100%

98%

80%

91%

96%

67%

74%

64%

69%

71%

89%

77%

48%

62%

76%




27/88


100%

Results by


24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino


White

Multiracial

Small Group Totals



English Proficient



Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant




2-4 3-4 4


2-4 3-4 4

This District


*Range: 648795 668795 700795

92% 92%

60% 54%

2% 1%

89% 89%

58% 54%

5% 4%


201112

201011


TotalTested

TotalTested

344 92% 60% 2% 369 92% 54% 1%

159

185

2

23

70

5242

2

9

268

76

342

2

133

211

1343

94%

91%

87%

90%

93%

100%

100%

67%

89%

94%

69%

52%

48%

60%

61%

56%

73%

14%

47%

68%

3%

2%

0%

1%

2%

11%

3%

0%

1%

3%

185

184

2

44

67

1255

47

306

63

366

3

133

236

1368

96%

89%

87%

94%

89%

98%

62%

86%

95%

58%

51%

49%

56%

53%

63%

13%

38%

64%

1%

1%

0%

1%

2%

1%

0%

1%

1%




28/88


100%

Results by


24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino


White

Multiracial

Small Group Totals



English Proficient



Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant




2-4 3-4 4


2-4 3-4 4

This District


*Range: 640780 676780 707780

95% 97%

74%71%

28%20%

93% 94%

67% 66%

28% 23%


201112

201011


TotalTested

TotalTested

343 95% 74% 28% 370 97% 71% 20%

159

184

2

23

70

5241

2

9

268

75

341

2

132

211

1342

95%

95%

91%

94%

95%

100%

98%

83%

92%

97%

74%

74%

70%

69%

76%

78%

84%

40%

67%

79%

33%

24%

17%

20%

30%

56%

34%

5%

22%

32%

186

184

2

44

68

1255

47

307

63

366

4

134

236

1369

99%

96%

96%

98%

98%

100%

86%

96%

98%

71%

71%

59%

76%

64%

80%

27%

63%

75%

24%

16%

9%

22%

26%

23%

5%

13%

24%




29/88


100%

Results by


24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino


White

Multiracial

Small Group Totals



English Proficient



Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant




2-4 3-4 4


2-4 3-4 4

This District


*Range: 644785 662785 694785

93% 94%

59% 66%

2% 5%

89% 88%

56% 56%

2% 4%


201112

201011


TotalTested

TotalTested

377 93% 59% 2% 371 94% 66% 5%

190

187

2

49

72

1

252

1

53

313

64

373

4

148

229

1376

96%

89%

83%

94%

96%

98%

66%

86%

97%

64%

54%

46%

63%

58%

68%

14%

41%

71%

3%

1%

1%

2%

2%

2%

0%

1%

3%

181

190

40

66

11

253

1

12

316

55

367

4

120

251

1370

96%

92%

90%

94%

94%

92%

97%

73%

92%

95%

71%

62%

50%

61%

72%

42%

72%

31%

58%

70%

7%

3%

3%

3%

6%

0%

5%

0%

1%

6%




30/88


100%

Results by


24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino


White

Multiracial

Small Group Totals



English Proficient



Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant




2-4 3-4 4


2-4 3-4 4

This District


*Range: 640780 674780 700780

90% 96%

54% 61%

18% 18%

92% 92%

65% 63%

31% 26%


201112

201011


TotalTested

TotalTested

378 90% 54% 18% 371 96% 61% 18%

192

186

2

49

74

1

251

1

53

315

63

372

6

149

2292

376

95%

86%

86%

92%

91%

97%

59%

91%

50%

85%

94%

57%

51%

39%

61%

42%

62%

11%

55%

0%

38%

64%

17%

19%

8%

21%

19%

21%

3%

18%

0%

11%

22%

182

189

40

65

11

254

1

12

316

55

367

4

121

2501

370

97%

95%

98%

95%

96%

92%

98%

84%

95%

96%

63%

59%

35%

63%

64%

67%

68%

22%

53%

65%

20%

16%

8%

17%

20%

25%

21%

2%

7%

23%




31/88


100%

Results by


24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino


White

Multiracial

Small Group Totals



English Proficient



Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant




2-4 3-4 4


2-4 3-4 4

This District


*Range: 642790 665790 698790

95% 94%

58%50%

2% 2%

92% 91%

52% 48%

4% 4%


201112

201011


TotalTested

TotalTested

365 95% 58% 2% 387 94% 50% 2%

179

186

43

65

10

247

308

57

363

2

136

2291

364

96%

94%

93%

94%

90%

96%

99%

72%

92%

97%

68%

49%

44%

58%

50%

61%

67%

12%

49%

64%

3%

1%

0%

2%

0%

3%

3%

0%

0%

3%

187

200

4

45

65

10

263

14

327

60

385

2

112

2751

386

98%

91%

96%

94%

95%

86%

99%

68%

93%

95%

58%

43%

42%

43%

53%

50%

57%

10%

33%

57%

4%

1%

2%

2%

3%

0%

2%

2%

0%

3%




32/88

100%

Results by


24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino


White

Multiracial

Small Group Totals



English Proficient



Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant


Results in Grade 7 MathematicsPercentage scoring at level(s):

2-4 3-4 4


2-4 3-4 4

This District


*Range: 639800 670800 694800

96% 94%

64% 64%

23% 26%

91% 92%

65% 65%

31% 30%


201112

201011


TotalTested

TotalTested

365 96% 64% 23% 388 94% 64% 26%

179

186

42

65

10

248

307

58

363

2

135

2301

364

96%

95%

98%

97%

90%

95%

99%

79%

94%

97%

70%

59%

43%

63%

70%

68%

72%

24%

54%

70%

25%

20%

10%

23%

10%

25%

26%

5%

12%

29%

188

200

4

46

65

10

263

14

328

60

385

3

113

2751

387

96%

92%

93%

91%

95%

93%

99%

65%

91%

95%

68%

60%

43%

55%

69%

64%

71%

23%

48%

70%

31%

22%

17%

15%

30%

29%

30%

7%

13%

31%




33/88

100%

Results by


24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino


White

Multiracial

Small Group Totals



English Proficient



Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant


Results in Grade 8 English Language ArtsPercentage scoring at level(s):

2-4 3-4 4


2-4 3-4 4

This District


*Range: 628790 658790 699790

95% 95%

54% 48%

1% 2%

93% 92%

50% 47%

2% 2%


201112

201011


TotalTested

TotalTested

387 95% 54% 1% 393 95% 48% 2%

188

199

4

50

67

9

257

13

332

55

384

3

126

2611

386

97%

93%

96%

93%

96%

85%

100%

69%

91%

97%

61%

47%

46%

43%

58%

62%

60%

15%

35%

63%

1%

1%

0%

1%

0%

8%

1%

0%

0%

1%

198

195

46

66

11

270

347

46

389

4

99

294

393

96%

93%

93%

92%

91%

96%

99%

65%

91%

96%

95%

57%

39%

35%

42%

45%

52%

53%

13%

31%

54%

48%

3%

0%

2%

0%

0%

2%

2%

0%

0%

2%

2%




34/88

100%

Results by


24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino


White

Multiracial

Small Group Totals



English Proficient



Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant


Results in Grade 8 MathematicsPercentage scoring at level(s):

2-4 3-4 4


2-4 3-4 4

This District


*Range: 639775 674775 704775

96% 96%

64% 65%

17% 15%

93% 91%

61% 60%

20% 18%


201112

201011


Total

Tested

Total

Tested385 96% 64% 17% 393 96% 65% 15%

186

199

4

50

68

9

254

13

333

52

381

4

125

2601

384

97%

95%

96%

96%

96%

92%

99%

79%

92%

98%

64%

64%

54%

53%

69%

54%

70%

23%

50%

71%

21%

13%

10%

9%

19%

31%

19%

2%

2%

24%

198

195

46

66

11

270

347

46

389

4

99

294

393

97%

94%

93%

98%

100%

95%

98%

76%

97%

95%

96%

71%

58%

57%

68%

64%

65%

70%

22%

55%

68%

65%

17%

13%

7%

8%

45%

17%

16%

9%

7%

17%

15%




35/88

100%

Results by


24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino


White

Multiracial

Small Group Totals



English Proficient



Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant


Results in Grade 8 SciencePercentage scoring at level(s):

2-4 3-4 4


2-4 3-4 4

This District

98% 98%86% 85%

38% 38%

93% 94%

73% 72%

30% 28%


201112

201011


Total

Tested

Total

Tested350 98% 85% 32% 354 97% 83% 31%

167

183

4

50

62

7

227

11

296

54

346

4

123

2271

349

98%

97%

98%

95%

98%

100%

100%

85%

96%

99%

87%

83%

76%

79%

89%

64%

92%

48%

75%

90%

33%

32%

26%

26%

35%

36%

36%

9%

20%

39%

175

179

45

65

8

236

309

45

350

4

96

258

354

98%

97%

96%

97%

100%

98%

99%

84%

98%

97%

97%

86%

81%

82%

77%

88%

85%

89%

44%

71%

88%

83%

29%

34%

20%

26%

25%

35%

35%

9%

18%

36%

31%




36/88

Statewide 201011 Results on theNational Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

% Below Basic % Basic % Proficient % Advanced

Grade 4 Reading

Grade 8 Reading

Grade 4 Mathematics

Grade 8 Mathematics

NOTES

*Reporting standards not met.**Rounds to 0.

Statewide 201011 NAEP Part icipation Rates

for LEP Students and Students with Disabili tiesParticipation Rate

Grade 4 Reading



Grade 8 Reading



Grade 4 Mathematics



Grade 8 Mathematics



NOTE

The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), developed in 1969, is a nationally representative assessment of the performance ofUnited States students in mathematics, reading, science, writing, the arts, civics, economics, geography, and U.S. history.

The NAEP assessment is administered to a sampling of schools across New York State. Teachers, principals, parents, policymakers,d h NAEP lt t d d l t i d ti i th U it d St t A t f f d l i t


32%

24%

20%

30%

33%

41%

44%

40%

26%

31%

31%

23%

9%

4%

5%

7%

84%

85%

77%84%

91%

90%

92%

91%



37/88

100%

Results byStudent Group

Percentage scoring at level(s): Percentage scoring at level(s):

24 34 4 24 34 4

All Student s

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino


White

Multiracial

Small Group Totals



English Proficient

Limited English ProficientEconomically Disadvantaged

Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant


Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English LanguageArts after Four Years of Instruction

This District


2-4 3-4 4

NY State Public


2-4 3-4 4

89% 88% 87% 87%

35% 33%

84% 83% 82% 80%

38% 35%2008 Cohort

2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort 2007 CohortNumber

of Students

Number

of Students

400 89% 87% 35% 430 88% 87% 33%

187

213

1

49

526

292

7333

67400

104

296

400

93%

85%

92%

88%

88%

100%94%

61%89%

84%

91%

89%

91%

84%

92%

87%

86%

100%94%

55%87%

81%

90%

87%

44%

26%

22%

35%

37%

43%41%

3%35%

18%

41%

35%

207

223

1

39

775

307

1

7373

57427

3101

329

430

89%

87%

92%

88%

88%

71%92%

61%

84%

89%

88%

88%

85%

90%

84%

87%

71%91%

56%

82%

88%

87%

39%

28%

15%

22%

38%

43%38%

2%

26%

36%

33%



38/88

100%

Results byStudent Group

Percentage scoring at level(s): Percentage scoring at level(s):

24 34 4 24 34 4

All Student s

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino


White

Multiracial

Small Group Totals



English Proficient



Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant


Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics afterFour Years of Instruction

This District


2-4 3-4 4

NY State Public


2-4 3-4 4

91% 91%88% 89%

22% 26%

87% 86% 82% 81%

22% 25%2008 Cohort

2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort 2007 CohortNumber

of Students

Number

of Students

400 91% 88% 22% 430 91% 89% 26%

187

213

1

49

526

292

7333

67400

104

296

400

94%

88%

90%

88%

91%

100%96%

63%91%

88%

92%

91%

91%

85%

88%

87%

87%

100%95%

49%88%

81%

90%

88%

25%

19%

10%

13%

25%

43%26%

1%22%

7%

27%

22%

207

223

1

39

775

307

1

7373

57427

3101

329

430

93%

88%

92%

91%

91%

71%95%

63%

91%

91%

91%

91%

87%

90%

90%

90%

71%94%

56%

89%

89%

89%

30%

22%

21%

16%

30%

29%30%

2%

15%

30%

26%



39/88

2008 Total Cohort Results in Secondary-LevelGlobal History and Geography, U.S. History and Government,and Science after Four Years of Instruction

All Student s General -Education Students Students with Disabi li ties

C

ohort

E

nrollment

Percentage of students

scoring: C

ohort

E

nrollment


scoring: C

ohort

E

nrollment


scoring:

55-64 65-84 85-100 55-64 65-84 85-100 55-64 65-84 85-100

Global History andGeography

U.S. History andGovernment

Science

New York State Alternate Assessments (NYSAA) 2011-12

All Students

TotalTested

Number of students

scoring at Level:

Secondary Level 1 2 3 4

English Language Arts

Mathematics

Social Studies

Science

NOTES

The symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, data for that group and the next smallest group(s) aresuppressed to protect the privacy of individual students.


400

400

400

5%

4%

4%

46%

35%

47%

35%

47%

40%

333

333

333

1%

1%

1%

50%

37%

48%

42%

55%

47%

67

67

67

22%

19%

19%

25%

24%

37%

1%

6%

6%

11

11

11

11

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

3

1

3

11

8

10

8



40/88

Regents ExamsAl l Students General -Education Students Students wi th Disabi li ties

TotalTested

Percentage of studentsscoring at or above:

TotalTested


TotalTested


55 65 85 55 65 85 55 65 85

Comprehensive English

Integrated Algebra

Geometry

Algebra 2/Trigonometry

Global History and Geography

U.S. History and Government

Living Environment

Physical Setting/Earth Science

Physical Setting/Chemistry

Physical Setting/Physics

NOTE


201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

429

448

399

374416

420

221

205

227

169

188

160

468

457

424

409

357

384

431

434

455

373

399

370

212

229

247121

104

152

97%

99%

97%

95%95%

95%

99%

99%

100%

92%

91%

90%

88%

87%

87%

92%

95%

98%

95%

96%

94%

90%

90%

89%

94%

96%

95%98%

89%

94%

94%

95%

92%

87%89%

90%

95%

97%

96%

78%

79%

78%

77%

75%

77%

87%

88%

95%

91%

89%

84%

79%

76%

79%

75%

83%

74%88%

78%

88%

29%

47%

37%

20%24%

23%

37%

41%

35%

28%

26%

24%

29%

30%

34%

45%

52%

62%

44%

43%

34%

43%

34%

34%

19%

23%

10%47%

33%

43%

371

407

355

312359

363

215

204

222

168

187

159

386

397

349

362

314

342

378

377

379

329

343

325

211

227

245120

104

150

99%

100%

99%

100%99%

99%

99%

100%

94%

92%

95%

97%

98%

99%

97%

99%

98%

94%

94%

93%

89%

96%

98%

96%

95%95%

96%

95%

96%

85%

82%

87%

93%

94%

98%

93%

93%

92%

84%

83%

84%

78%

33%

51%

41%

22%27%

27%

37%

35%

34%

34%

41%

49%

58%

66%

47%

48%

40%

48%

38%

38%

33%

58

41

44

6257

57

6

1

5

1

1

1

82

60

75

47

43

42

53

57

76

44

56

45

1

2

21

0

2

86%

88%

84%

73%68%

68%

100%

100%

60%

52%

49%

60%

77%

88%

85%

81%

75%

61%

64%

56%

76%

71%

59%

47%53%

49%

100%

100%

38%

28%

29%

38%

47%

74%

74%

61%

46%

43%

36%

42%

3%

2%

5%

5%4%

0%

33%

40%

5%

7%

4%

9%

9%

24%

19%

14%

4%

9%

4%

7%



41/88

Regents Competency TestsAl l Students General -Education Students Students with Disab il it ies

TotalTested Percent Passing:



Mathematics

Science

Reading

Writing

Global Studies

U.S. History and Government

NOTE

The symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, data for that groupand the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students.


201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

14

11

13

5

712

9

7

11

7

6

12

37

37

47

18

13

15

57%

55%

62%

60%

57%75%

67%

29%

82%

71%

67%

75%

24%

16%

47%

44%

54%

40%

0

1

1

0

00

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

3

0

0

1

0

14

10

12

5

712

9

7

11

7

6

12

37

34

47

18

12

15

57%

60%

57%75%

67%

29%

82%

71%

67%

75%

24%

47%

44%

40%



42/88

New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test(NYSESLAT)

All Students General-Education Students Students wi th Disabil it ies

TotalTested

Percent of students scoring

in each performance level:TotalTested


in each performance level:TotalTested


in each performance level:

Begin.

Interm.

Adv.

Prof.

Begin.

Interm.

Adv.

Prof.

Begin.

Interm.

Adv.

Prof.

Listening andSpeaking

(Grades K1)

Reading andWriting

(Grades K1)


(Grades 24)

Reading andWriting

(Grades 24)


(Grades 56)

Reading andWriting

(Grades 56)


(Grades 78)

Reading andWriting

(Grades 78)


(Grades 912)


201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

16

16

11

16

16

11

12

813

12

8

13

8

8

9

8

8

9

6

7

10

6

7

10

5

7

4

5

0%

0%

0%

0%

13%

0%

0%

0%0%

0%

0%

0%

25%

0%

0%

25%

0%

11%

17%

0%

10%

17%

14%

20%

0%

0%

0%

6%

13%

9%

56%

38%

45%

0%

0%0%

17%

13%

15%

0%

25%

22%

0%

13%

11%

17%

0%

10%

33%

29%

40%

0%

0%

20%

69%

56%

9%

25%

19%

18%

25%

13%31%

42%

38%

54%

38%

38%

11%

38%

38%

44%

0%

29%

20%

33%

0%

30%

60%

43%

20%

25%

31%

82%

19%

31%

36%

75%

88%69%

42%

50%

31%

38%

38%

67%

38%

50%

33%

67%

71%

60%

17%

57%

10%

40%

57%

60%

14

13

10

14

13

10

8

79

8

7

9

7

7

7

7

7

7

4

6

7

4

6

7

4

6

4

4

2

3

1

2

3

1

4

14

4

1

4

valley central school district proposed budget 2013-2014

Documents