version of the policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_psotc qa policy.pdfsact...

83
1

Upload: others

Post on 04-Oct-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

1

Page 2: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

2

NOTE:

This Quality Assurance Policy is an abstract from PSOTC SOP published on 25 Jan 2016,

in order to inform future course participants, permanent and temporary posted members of

PSOTC as well as wider public on Quality Assurance Standards applied at PSOTC. Full

version of the Policy is available on request.

Page 3: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

3

CONTENT THE FULL VERSION OF

PSOTC SOP

(The blue chapters are enclosed in this abstract Quality Assurance Policy)

Abbreviations

Introduction

100. General Management (Business Plan)…………………………………………………..….....08

1. Strategic Environment

2. Vision

3. Mission

4. Organizational Values

5. Establishment, Organization of the Training Centre and Tasks of the Key Personnel

6. Organizational Goals

7. General Management System

8. Participation in international activities

9. Caveats

10. Annexes:

A. Outline of Key Documents Regulating Status, Organization and Administration at

PSOTC in Accordance with Regulations of the AFBiH and MoD BiH

B. Organization of PSOTC and Tasks of Key Functions

C. Template for Meeting Minutes

200. Education and Training Management.....…………………......................................................17

1. Purpose

2. Current Education and Training Products at PSOTC

3. Objectives of ET Management

4. Application of Systems Approach to Education and Training

5. Annexes:

A. Template – Activity Scoping Paper

B. Template – Course Control Document I - Control Form

C. Template – Course Control Document II - Course Proposal

D. Template – Course Control Document III - Program of Classes

E. Template – HETD’s Annual Training Management Instruction

F. Responsibilities of a Course Director’s and a Course Administrator

G. Template – Course Administrative Instruction

H. Template – Course Invitation Letter

I. Template – External Speaker Invitation Letter

J. Template – Visa Support Letter

K. Template – Course Background Brief

L. Template – Standard PSOTC Slide and Structure of a Lecture

300. Quality Assurance Policy……………………………………………...……………….………18

1. Introduction

2. The Aim of the Quality Assurance Policy

3. Scope

4. Quality Assurance Strategy

5. External institutional evaluation

6. Institutional self-assessment

7. Directing Staff professional development

8. Information systems and knowledge management

Page 4: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

4

9. Communication and Public Affairs

10. Annexes:

A. Responsibilities of Course Director and Course Administrator

B. Instructions on Conduct of Education and Training

C. Student Code of Conduct

D. Assessment of the Students

E. Template - Student Feedback Form

F. Template - Staff Lessons Identified Sheet

G. Instructions Monitoring Report

H. Course Monitoring Report

I. Instructions on Course Close Out – First Stage of Post Course Review

J. Instructions on Quality Management Committee

K. Instructions on Academic Management Board

L. Organization and conduct of Cooperation Committee

M. Directing staff professional development

N. Information systems and knowledge management

O. Communication and Public Affairs

SOP 400. Instructions on Support and Resource Management…………………………………...79

1. Purpose

2. Structure

3. Quality Assurance Objectives

4. Responsibilities for support and resources management

5. Current PSOTC’s capacities and capabilities in support of training activities

6. Personnel management

7. Security of information, personnel and material

8. Students’ administrative support

9. Logistics resources management

10. Financial management

11. IT support

12. Annexes:

A. PSOTC Key Staff Current Professional Development Overview

B. PSOTC Teaching Facilities Management Plan

Page 5: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

5

Abbreviations

ACO Allied Command Operations

ACT Allied Command Transformation

ADC Annual Discipline Conference

ADL Advanced Distributed Learning

ADDIE Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation and Evaluation

AF BiH Armed Forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina

AMB Academic Management Board

ASOP Administrative Standard Operating Procedures

Bi-SCD Bi-Strategic Commands Directive

BUDFIN Budget and Finance

CA Course Administrator

CAAR Course After Action Report

CCD Course Control Document

CD Course Director

CIP Continuous Improvement Process

CO Commanding Officer

COOPC Cooperation Committee

COS Chief of Staff

CSM Command Sergeant Major

C2 Command and Control

COE Centre of Excellence

CT&E Collective Training & Exercises

DH Department Head

DS Directing Staff

DRC Decision Revision Council

DOTMLPFI Doctrine, Organization, (Education and) Training, Material, Leadership,

Personnel, Facilities and Interoperability

E&IT Education and Individual Training

ET Education and Training

e-ITEP Electronic Individual Training and Education Programme

e-Learning Electronic Learning

ELO Enabling/Learning Objective

e-PRIME electronic Partnership Real-Time Information Management and Exchange

System

ETEE Education, Training, Exercise and Evaluation

ETF Education and Training Facility

ETPD/QMS Education and Training Plans and Development/Quality Management

Section

ETOC Education and Training Opportunities Catalogue

EU European Union

EUFOR European Union Forces in Bosnia and Herzegovina

FAA Formally Assessed Activity

FoPM Friends of PSOTC

HETD Head of Education and Training Department

HETS Head of Education and Training Section

HOTO Hand over – Take over

HQ Headquarters

ISD Instructional System Design

IAW In accodance with

ITEP Individual Training and Education Programme

JD Job Description

Page 6: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

6

KLT Key Leader Training

LI Lessons Identified

LIVEX Live Exercise

LL Lessons Learned

LMS Learning Management System

LOA Level of Ambition

MTTD Mobile Training Team Director

MoU Memorandum of Understanding

MPD Military Partnership Directorate

MTEP Military Training and Exercise Programme

MoD Ministry of Defence

NAC North Atlantic Council

NATO HQ Sa NATO Headquarters in Sarajevo (BiH)

NCO Non-commissioned Officer

NETF NATO Education and Training Facility

NFS NATO Force Structure

NITEC NATO Individual Training and Education Conference

NNE Non-NATO Entity

NRF NATO Response Force

NTEC NATO Training and Exercise Conference

NTG TG IT&ED NATO Training Group – Task Group Individual Training and Education

Developments

OC AF BiH Operational Command of the AF BiH

OCE Officer Conducting the Exercise

ODE Officer Directing the Exercise

OJT On–Job–Training

OPR Officer of Primary Responsibility

OSE Officer Scheduling the Exercise

PCR Post Course Review

PCM Partnership Cooperation Menu

PfP Partnership for Peace

PNLR Partner National Liaison Representative at HQ SACT

PK Peacekeeping

PSO Peace Support Operations

PCRM Post Course Review Meeting

POC Point Of Contact

PO Performance Objective

PTEC Partnership Training and Education Centre

QA Quality Assurance

QC Quality Control

QM Quality Management

QMS Quality Management System

QMC Quality Management Comitee

QAP Quality Management Policy

RAD Rapid Analysis and Design

RA Requirements Authority

SACEUR Supreme Allied Commander Europe

SACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation

SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education, Training, Exercise and

Evaluation

SAT Systems Approach to Training

SHAPE Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe

SME Subject Matter Expert

SOP Standard Operating Procedure

SWSSC Section for Wider Security Sector Courses

Page 7: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

7

SOFC Section for Officers’' Functional Courses

SNCOC Section for NCO Course

SPR Section of Primary Responsibility

SC AF BiH Support Command of the AF BiH

STP Strategic Training Plan

TA Target Audience

TAA Target Audience Analysis

TCM Training Coordination Meeting

TRADOC AF BiH Training and Doctrine Command of the AF BiH

TSOPETM TRDOC’s SOP for ET Management

ToE Team of Experts

TNA Training Needs Analysis

TRA Training Requirements Analysis

TSC Training Synchronization Conference

WG Working Group

Page 8: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

8

Introduction

Peace Support Operations Training Centre (PSOTC) / the Armed Forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina

(AFBiH) was established in 2005 as an international joint venture of 18 partner countries, led by UK

with the purpose to deliver a world class peace support training to the staff officers of the AF BiH

deploying on international peace keeping (PK) missions. Since then, the Centre evolved into

internationally recognized education and training (ET) institution that extended its mandate to train

candidates from across the region, including NCOs, police officers and civilians. The Centre was

handed over to the AF BiH by the end of 2012, while still preserving its international profile by

having international instructors on its staff and by training international students.

SOP 100. General Management at PSOTC (Business Plan)

1. Strategic Environment

Currently, the range of immediate and long-term security challenges and threats to the

international security and thus to NATO and its Partner nations, besides few inter and many intra-

state conflicts, includes abuses of human rights, terrorism, the proliferation of weapons of mass

destruction, cyber attacks, energy and illegal technology related security challenges. In its New

Strategic Concept (2010), NATO called for “…Partnerships (that) make a concrete and valued

contribution to the success of NATO’s fundamental tasks. Dialogue and cooperation with

partners can make a concrete contribution to enhancing international security...“1

In the light with above given statement and being one of a NATO’s Partner Training and

Education Centre (PTEC) since 2007, Peace Support Operations Training Centre (PSOTC) / the

Armed Forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina (AFBiH) has been delivering number of courses (out of

which six are accredited as NATO SELECTED ones) to more than 6000 military, police and civil

servants/students from 45 NATO and Partner nations during the last decade. In addition, the

Centre was declared as one of five Regional Training Centers for PSO within South East Europe

Clearing House Format in 2009. As such, the Centre has become the pre-eminent military/police

and civil servants training centre for peace support operations, not only in the country, but also

PSOTC has gained an internationally endorsed reputation for excellence.

2. Vision

The Peace Support Operations Training Centre (PSOTC), a NATO Partnership education and

training facility, continues to perform as a centre of excellence in PSO in order to support the

professional development of the AF BiH, offering education and training to other BiH institutions

as well as to NATO and international partners, while still preserving its global and regional reach.

3. Mission

Peace Support Operations Training Centre performs training and education in the field of peace

support operations (PSO) for the Armed Forces of BiH (AF BiH) and for members outside of the

Ministry of Defence (MOD) of Bosnia and Herzegovina, as well as acts as a NATO Partnership

and Regional training centre for education and training in PSO in support of the partners, with the

goal of reaching NATO and UN compatible standards and providing support to the AFBiH in

overall efforts of BiH’s contribution to international peace and security.

4. Organizational Values and Commandant’s leadership principles

a. Core organizational values are:

1) Professionalism

All members of PSOTC will work not just to meet the minimum standard, but consistently strive

to do their very best to achieve and maintain highest quality standards in the Centre. Members of

the Centre will commit themselves to excellence in all aspects of their professional responsibility,

1 The 2010 NATO Strategic Concept at http://www.nato.int

Page 9: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

9

while adhering to principles of professional ethics: loyalty, selfless service, integrity and

professional solidarity.

2) Cultural Awareness

Appreciating the importance of operating in a multicultural and international context, PSOTC

actively demonstrates dedication to engage in collaboration with partner nations and institutions

within and beyond South East Europe. Therefore, PSOTC staff will pay extraordinary attention to

cultural awareness within and outside of the Centre.

3) Innovation

Taking into account that the new ideas are the main drivers behind organizational

development, PSOTC encourages its staff to bring in new initiatives based on

operational requirements and technological developments that would increase

quality of education and training as well as welfare of the students and staff in the

Centre.

4) Constant Improvement

The achievement of highest international standards requires constant improvement in policies,

processes and procedures. PSOTC is dedicated to continuous revision of education and training

processes, professional development of its personnel and administrative procedures that would

lead to costumer oriented constant quality satisfaction and improvement.

b. Commandant’s leadership principles at PSOTC:

1) Develop and focus on a narrow agenda;

2) Look for opportunities to act;

3) Bring honesty and integrity to all that you do;

4) Be aware;

5) Pay attention to people.

5. Establishment, Organization and Functional Committees and other advisory bodies at the Centre

a. Establishment of the Centre

Peace Support Operations Training Centre (PSOTC) is a training centre within Training

and Doctrine Command of the Support Command of the Armed Forces of Bosnia and

Herzegovina (AFBiH) with delegated authorities by the Joint Staff and Ministry of

Defence of Bosnia and Herzegovina with regard to:

1) International cooperation with partner nations and similar institutions

2) Management of partner donated material resources

3) Management of partner donated financial resources

4) Public Affairs

5) Administration of international staff at PSOTC

b. Organization of the Centre /Functional responsibilities

The Centre is organized in three permanent organizational units:

2) Office of the Commandant – Commandant (CO)

a) Command Sergeant Major (CSM)

b) Public Affairs / Personal Assistant to the CO (PAA)

Page 10: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

10

3) Staff - Chief of Staff (COS)

a) Section for Personnel (S1)

b) Section for Security and Operations (S2/3)

c) Section for Logistics (S4)

d) Section for CIS (S6)

e) Section for Budgeting and Finance

4) Education and Training Department – Head of Department (HETD)

a) Education and Training Plans and Development/Quality Management

Section (ETPD/QMS)

b) Section for Officers’ Functional Courses (SOFC)

c) Section for Wider Security Sector Courses (SWSSC)

d) Section for NCOs’ Courses (SNCOC)

e) Mobile Training Team Director (MTTD)

Detailed organization of the Centre and tasks of the key functions is given in SOP 100 -

Annex B.

c. Functional Committees and other advisory bodies at the Centre

For the purpose of the overall management and quality improvements at the Centre,

PSOTC has established Academic Management Board (AMB) and Quality Management

Committee (QMC). Furthermore, PSOTC has Cooperation Committee (COOPC), with an

advisory role to the CO, AMB and QMC regarding questions and initiatives that would

lead to quality assurance improvements. The COOPC involves different organizational

parts of the Centre as well the students.

In addition, the Centre is supported with an annual forum Friends of POSTC (FoP),

consisting of representatives of partner nations and institutions, which has an external

education and training validation role to PSOTC as well as an advisory role to senior

management within the AF BiH and Ministry of Defence of Bosnia and Herzegovina,

pertaining questions related to PSOTC. Detailed instructions on functional committees are

given in SOP 300.

6. Organizational Goals, which are subject to five year revision, are as follows:

a. Deliver high quality, costumer oriented and internationally recognized (UN, NATO and

EU) education and training.

b. Support education and training of the members of the Armed Forces and other security

institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina for peace support operations.

c. Contribute to NATO education and training efforts and thereby foster integration of

Bosnia and Herzegovina into NATO.

d. Strive for gender equality in the Centre through gender mainstreaming IAW relevant

international and national regulations.

e. Constantly improve learning and working environment which stimulates students' and

staff's creativity, learning, interaction, and consensus reaching.

f. Maintain continues improvement of all aspects of quality assurance, with emphasis on:

personnel development, education and training process, students’ welfare and provision of

quality resources.

Page 11: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

11

7. General Management System

The General Management System at PSOTC consists of a structure, processes and procedures

which are used to provide effective and efficient management in the Centre in order to produce

high quality costumer oriented products by applying NATO Quality Standards.

a. General Management Structure and Process

The General Management Process is of continuous nature, it provides a framework for annual

planning, resourcing, delivery and performance review at the PSOTC in accordance with AF

BiH TRADOC’s SOP on Education and Training Management (TSOPETM). The core

General Management Process is considered to be planning, organization and delivery of high

quality education and training at PSOTC. As per TSOPTEM, planning cycle for ET activities

that will be delivered in the year after upcoming one (Y+1) starts in November of the current

year, with submission of Initial Proposal of ET Activities to be conducted in Y+1 from

PSOTC to AFBiH TRADOC, and finishes by 1 May next year with the Final Proposal of ET

Activities to be conducted, at that time already, in upcoming year.

Based on the described planning cycle of PSOTC’s higher HQ, the General Management

Process for the implementation of activities run at the Centre is based on continues quality

improvement cycle that encompasses five phases: scoping and analysis; planning, resourcing

and approval; implementation and delivery; monitoring and assessment; and revision of

processes, procedures and practices by taking into account operational requirements,

stakeholders’ and students’ feedback, inputs from external validation, doctrinal and

technological developments.

The Structure of General Management supports the General Management Process and

includes responsible departments, offices and committees at PSOTC. An overview of the

structure and processes of the General Management System is given in Figure 1 below,

followed by detailed description of the process and responsibilities within the General

Management System.

Figure 1: General Management System

1) Phase 1– Scoping and Analysis

The Scoping and Analysis phase aims at conducting an initial feasibility assessment with

regard to possibilities and priorities of delivery of received training request at PSOTC

Implementation and delivery

Monitoring and assessmnt

Revision of Processes and

procedures

Scoping and Analysis

Planning/ resourcing

- Operational requirements - Technology - Doctrine - Law and regulations

Quality Management

- Trained / satisfied costumer - Improved organizational:

Performance

Credibility

Sustainability - Support to ops performance Satisfied costumer -

Page 12: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

12

against its current commitments and resources. Upon reception of the requirement, HETD

will task ETPD/QMS to lead initial estimate and scoping of available resources and

requirements for development of a new training product, together with other sections

within PSOTC ETD its Staff as well as requesting authority as required.

Once results of the scoping phase have been collected and analyzed, HETD will present

proposal to the PSOTC Commandant in a form of an Activity Scoping Paper, requesting an

initial decision whether to proceed with follow up phase. The Activity Scoping Paper will

offer a background of the training requirement; impact and constrains by delivering the

course; required resources for the course development, including Section of Primary

Responsibility within ETD (SPR, a section where future course functionally belongs),

required external expertise/resource support and timeline for course development. Once

Commandant’s decision is received, HETD will provide an informal initial response to

requesting authority within 30 days from the reception of the training requirement as well

as task ETPD/QMS and SPR to proceed with the next phase.

2) Phase 2 – Planning, Resourcing and Approval

Upon reception of the initial Commandant’s decision to proceed with further training

product development; HETD will task ETDPS/QMS to coordinate further course

development in accordance with Bi-SCD 075-007 (Chapter 5 and 6), PSOTC SOP 200-ET

Management and the approved Activity Scoping Paper. During this phase, Course Control

Documents (CCDs) I-III will be prepared, detailed planning of resources will be conducted

in coordination with PSOTC Staff and external stakeholders. The HETD will present CCD

I and II and propose their approval during AMB session.

In terms of timeframe, though the Scoping and Analysis phase has continues character,

major milestones time wise are driven by the ET planning cycle of the higher HQ, as

prescribed above. Therefore, the final approval of new training requirements which will be

conducted in Y+1 will be taken during AMB meetings in October or latest in April,

depending when a training requirement is received in order to give sufficient time for

efficient and effective execution of follow up phases of the Management Process. In

exceptional circumstances and depending on priorities of a training requirement, i.e.

response to immediate operational requirement, PSOTC Commandant may call for ad-hoc

AMB’s session to approve a training requirement outside of above given timeframe.

However, in this case such a training requirement must be approved by higher HQ as well.

3) Phase 3 – Implementation and Delivery

This phase starts when a training requirement is approved by AMB and endorsed by

AFBiH TRADOC through Annual Training Plan for upcoming year.

Based on these and inputs received from Training Sections in ETD, ETPD/QMS will draft

PSOTC Commandant’s Annual Guidelines for Education and Training, which will include

Annual Training Calendar. The PSOTC Commandant’s Annual Guidelines for Education

and Training will be supported by Annual Procurement Plan drafted by Logistics, draft

Annual Budget produced by Budget and Finance Section (BUDFIN) as well as by Annual

International Activities Plan drafted by ETPD/QMS.

In accordance with the PSOTC Commandant’s Annual Guidelines for Education and

Training, HETD will issue Annual Instruction for ET Management, which will: identify

Course Director for each course and activity coordinator for other activities other than

courses; define MTT engagements and configurations; regulate students distribution on

each course; define instructors exchange with other partner institutions and support to

NATO and other international activities and define Directing Staff Development Program.

Implementation and Delivery of an ET product will be done IAW Bi-SCD 075-007

(Chapter 7and 8) and instructions provided in PSOTC SOP 200-ET Management.

Page 13: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

13

4) Phase 4 – Monitoring and Assessment

The Monitoring and Assessment of the implementation of ET products aims at assessing

efficiency and effectiveness of delivery of ET product in order to identify areas for

improvement and factors that would lead to increase in quality delivery of the same

product during following iteration.

The Monitoring and Assessment phase will be conducted IAW Bi-SCD 075-007 (Chapter

9) and instructions provided in PSOTC SOP 200 – ET Management and SOP 300 –

Quality Management Policy. ETPD/QMS is responsible to organize and coordinate

collection of the results of monitoring and assessment of processes at PSOTC as well as to

prepare QMC Sessions. The QMC will review and discuss collected results in order to

identify deficiencies in processes as well as recommendations for the AMB how to

improve future performances. The QMC findings and recommendations to the AMB will

be documented and submitted in a form the Meeting Minutes (Template at SOP 100 –

Annex C, which is to be used for organization and post-meeting follow up activities for all

meetings at PSOTC).

5) Phase 5 – Revision of Processes, Procedures and Practices

The Revision of Processes, Procedures and Practices aims at consistent improvement in

overall organizational performances and quality assurance. Once the Meeting Minutes of

the QMC are approved by the CO, PSOTC’s COS and HETD respectively for their

departments will make changes in existing SOP and/or ASOP and communicate changes to

the staff, requesting adherence of the staff to a new/improved functional/organizational

procedures.

8. Participation in international activities

The participation in international activities of PSOTC is one of delegated responsibilities and

authorities from the Joint Staff of the Armed Forces and MoD of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the

Centre. The Centre will be engaged in number of international activities based on Annual

International Activities Plan, which will be drafted by ETPD/QMS and submitted to MoD BiH for

approval by the end of July current year for upcoming calendar year.

The Centre will participate in international activities through:

a. Support to NATO ET efforts, in particular:

i. Addressing NATO ET requirements through residential and MTT courses.

ii. Contribution to developing and management of the developed training disciplines with

focus on: Building Integrity, PSO and COIN, Gender on Operations, CIMIC, Protection of

civilians on operations; by participating in different conferences, workshops, seminars and

working groups (i.e. TEPSO).

iii. Participation in Science for Peace Projects in support of concepts and doctrine

development, with priority on Protection of Cultural Property on operations.

iv. Organization and participation in Community of Interest programs and events: PTEC

Commandants’ Conference and Working Group, PTEC Marketplace and Instructors’

Exchange Program.

v. Seeking for operational lessons learned through engagement with relevant institutions and

platforms (i.e. TRANSNET).

b. Training of international students on residential courses at PSOTC. In principle, for the period

2015-2017, one participant/course will be fully sponsored from following countries: ALB,

Page 14: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

14

HRV, GEO, MNE, MKD, SRB and UKR. The sponsorship on courses using PSOTC’s

subaccount financial means or the third party sponsorship will be declared and confirmed on

annual basis in coordination with the MoD and the sponsoring party, if applicable.

c. Deployment of PSOTC’s MTT in above mentioned countries on self-financial basis, except

accommodation for the Team, which will be responsibility of the Host Nation. The MTT can

be deployed to other countries as well as based on the arrangement with requesting party.

d. Participation or organization of the UN related events such as: Annual Conference of

International Association of Peacekeeping Training Centers (organization of the Conference in

2016), doctrinal and lessons learned events related to PSO, gender, protection of civilians,

protection of cultural property on operations.

9. Caveats

Though PSOTC’s objective is to contribute to NATO education and training efforts in its full

capacity with application of NATO standards and procedures to ET process IAW Bi-SCD 075-

007, the role of the Centre within the AFBiH and training priorities will be addressed in

accordance with the Decision of Ministry of Defence of Bosnia and Herzegovina No: 06-03-15-

1585/12, dated 12 Mar 2012 (Outline in SOP 100-Annex B).

10. Annexes:

A. Outline of Key Documents Regulating Status, Organization and Administration at PSOTC in

Accordance with Regulations of the AFBiH and MoD BiH

B. Organization of PSOTC and Tasks of Key Functions

C. Template for Meeting Minutes

Page 15: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

15

SOP 100-Annex B

Organization and Tasks of Key Functions at PSOTC

1. Postion of PSOTC within the Organizational Structure of the Armed Forces of Bosnia

and Herzegovina

Page 16: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

16

2. Organization of PSOTC

(The rest of the Chapter is avilable on request)

COMMANDANT, OF - 5

COS

OF-4

Head S3

Ops and Sec. NCO

Admin.

Head S4

Logistics NCO

Maint. NCO

Soldier-Operator

Driver

Driver

Driver

Cleaning

Head S6

IT NCO

Comms

Head BUDFIN

Expert Advisor

Cashier

Head S1

Personnel NCO

Archive NCO

Head of Training and Education

OF-4

MTT Head Head Wider

Security Courses

DS

DS

Head Officers’ Courses

DS

DS

Head NCO Courses

DS

DS

Librarian (Vacant)

Plans, Dev. /QM Section

Plans NCO

TUR DS

ALB DS

MKD DS

AUT DS

CSM PR Officer

English Lang. Teacher

Page 17: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

17

SOP 200. Education and Training (Available on request)

Page 18: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

18

SOP 300. Quality Assurance Policy

1. Introduction

The achievement of highest international standards requires constant improvement in policies,

process and procedures. PSOTC is dedicated to continuous revision of education and training

processes, professional development of its personnel and administrative procedures that would

lead to costumer oriented constant quality improvement. As such, the Centre is committed to

apply NATO Quality Management Standards2 and other NATO compatible standards

3 to all

organizational processes and procedures in order to improve its Quality Management System

(QMS) and by doing so to achieve NATO Institutional Accreditation.

2. The Aim of the Quality Assurance Policy

The aim of the Quality Assurance Policy (QAP) is to define Quality Assurance Strategy,

Institutional self-assessment, External institutional evaluation, Directing Staff professional

development, Information and knowledge management and Communication and Public Affairs

strategy in order to provide conditions for continuous improvement of the core management

process at PSOTC IAW NATO Quality Management Standards.

3. Scope

The QAP is to provide instruction on all aspects of internal Continuous Improvement Process4

within the core management domain (process), which is considered to be planning, preparation,

execution, evaluation and review of courses and enabling sub-processes at PSOTC in order to

meet stakeholders’ training requirements IAW NATO Quality Management Standards. It applies

to all permanent staff and temporarily posted members at PSOTC as well as on the students

attending ET activities at the Centre. The external aspects of Continuous Improvement Process

rest with NATO ACT.

4. Quality Assurance Strategy

In line with PSOTC’s SOP 100 (General Management at PSOTC - Business Plan) and the QAP,

the QA Strategy aims at setting QA objectives; organization and responsibilities for QA in the

implementation of the core management process, involvement of internal and external

stakeholders, monitoring and review of QAP IAW PSOTC’s values, Mission and Vision and

IAW NATO Quality Management Standards, in order to ensure continuous improvement of the

core management process and enabling (supporting) sub-processes at the Centre.

a. Quality Assurance Objectives

1) Develop QA mechanisms, with defined responsibilities, which would effectively

implement, monitor and review PSOTC’s QAP and processes as a system.

2) Prepare and deliver high quality, student focused and stakeholder driven education and

training IAW NATO Quality Management Standards.

3) Constantly strive to improve learning and working environment which stimulates

students' and staff's creativity, learning, interaction, and consensus reaching.

4) Maintain continues improvement of organizational performances based on measurement

of organizational processes and products, with emphasis on: personnel development,

education and training process, students’ welfare and provision of quality resources.

2 NATO Bi-SC Direcitve 075-007, Annex D, 10 Sep 2015.

3 European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA), Report on Standards and

3 European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA), Report on Standards and

Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area, Helsinki, 2009 4 NATO Bi-SC Direcitve 075-007, 10 Sep 2015.

Page 19: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

19

5) Develop internal information and knowledge management system that would enable

effective internal information exchange and establish and maintain an external

communication and Public Affairs policy, system and procedures that would enable

regular, objective and accurate information update of external stakeholders and

community of interest on ET activities executed by PSOTC.

b. Organization and Responsibilities

1) The Organization for QAP implementation and review at PSOTC will be developed and

maintained as depicted on Figure 3 below:

Figure 3 – Organization for Quality Assurance Policy implementation and review

2) Responsibilities

a) Commandant. The Commandant is overall responsible for :

i. The Quality Assurance Policy at PSOTC.

ii. Chairing of Academic Management Board (AMB) and Cooperation Committee

(COOPC) sessions.

b) Chief of Staff. The Chief of Staff (COS) is responsible to the Commandant for:

i. A quality and effective management of provision of material and services,

maintenance and budgeting in support of education and training activities at the

Centre IAW with PSOTC QAP.

ii. Provision of information related to QA in management processes conducted by

the Staff during QMC and AMB sessions.

iii. Providing inputs into PSOTC's QA Annual Report and Support Plan.

c) Head of Education and Training Department. The Head of Education and Training

Department (HETD) is responsible to the commandant for:

i. Implementation and review of Quality Assurance Policy in ET processes.

ii. Preparation of Academic Management Board (AMB) and COOPC meetings.

iii. Chairing of Quality Management Committee (QMC) in PSOTC.

COMMANDANT

COS

S3 S4 S6 BUDFIN S1

HETD

ETS x 3

CD

CA

DS

DS

MTT Leader

DS

DS

QMC

ETPD/QMS

AMB COOPC

LEGEND - AMB: Academic Management Board - COOPC: Cooperation Committee - QMC: Quality Management Committee - COS: Chief of Staff - HETD: Head of Education and Training Department - ETPD/QMS: Education and Training Plans, Development / Quality Management Section - ETS: Education and Training Section - MTT Leader: Mobile Training Team Leader - CD: Course Director - DS: Directing Staff (Instructor) - CA: Course Administrator

DS: Directing Staff (Instructor)

Page 20: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

20

iv. Overall responsible for functioning of ET Department, completeness and

readiness of teaching staff and facilities given at the disposal of ET Department.

v. Planning, preparation and execution of Education and Training activities at the

Centre.

vi. Execution of training activities and personally and/or through Heads of sections

monitors quality of teaching process and quality of teaching staff.

vii. Constant evaluation and improvements of education and training activities in the

Centre.

viii. Approval of required reports related to education and training in the Centre,

including Annual QA Report.

d) Head of Education and Training Section (HETS) and MTT Director is responsible to

HETD for:

i. Planning, preparation, delivery and quality evaluation of courses which

functionally belong to the particular Section.

ii. Direct monitoring and evaluation of organization, preparation and delivery of

courses within the Section and, if needed, personally leads courses and delivers

lectures.

iii. Coaching of the DSs within the Section and support their professional

development.

iv. Constant improvements in courses which functionally belong to the particular

Section.

v. Responsible for all planning and reporting documentation related to the activities

of the Section.

e) Head of Education and Training Plans and Development / Quality Management

Section (HETPD / QMS) is responsible to HETD for:

i. Preparation of annual planning documents for Education and Training.

ii. Development, coordination and execution of ET projects in cooperation with

partner agencies.

iii. Activities related to Analysis phase of SAT and coordinates follow up SAT

phases with CDs.

iv. Planning and coordination of evaluation of courses at PSOTC.

v. Monitoring of execution and compliance with Academic QA processes and

procedures.

vi. Preparation of Quality Management Committee sessions and follows up

execution of its recommendations and decisions.

vii. Drafting of Annual QA Report.

f) Course Director (CD) is responsible to HETS for:

i. Development and maintenance of CCD III, a course preparation, conduct and

close out – post course evaluation.

ii. Identification of supporting requirements and efficient management of allocated

resources for a particular course.

iii. Identification of requirements for external speakers/role players and coordination

of all external agencies involved in support and execution of the course as well as

preparation of filed exercises/study trips.

iv. Conduct of other responsibilities given in PSOTC SOP 200 and SOP 300 –

Annex A.

g) Course Administrator (CA)

i. Coordinate support to the training activities in all three phases according to SOP

300 – Annex A.

Page 21: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

21

ii. Coordinate transport, accommodation, meals, refreshments, access cards to Camp

EUFOR, social and cultural activities for the students and external speakers/role

players and other supporting needs with respective staff sections according to the

Course Supporting Requirements Matrix.

h) Quality Management Committee is authorized and responsible for:

i. Review Quality Assurance Policy and related SOPs for their consistency,

relevance and the need to be improved.

Review organizational performance effectiveness based on key performance

indicators.

ii. Provide recommendations for improvements of quality management to the AMB

and the CO.

iii. The second annual session of the QMC will approve PSOTC Annual QA Report.

i) Academic Management Board is responsible and authorized to/for:

i. Conduct qualitative, quantitative and financial review of activities

conducted at the centre.

ii. Approval of courses and resources for upcoming year and submission to

higher HQ (April’s session).

iii. Provide Annual Guidelines for courses and resources in upcoming year

(November’s session).

iv. Approve conduct of new courses and initiatives to be run at the Centre

during CY+1.

v. Approve changes in Quality Assurance Policy and related SOPs.

j) Cooperation Committee. The purpose of the COOPC is to ensure that the CO is

provided with the best possible advises and information for decision making to the

benefit of the Centre from different entities within PSOTC, including students’ body.

The COOPC is to enhance successful mission accomplishment - to ensure that

contents and performance of courses and other activities conducted at PSOTC gets as

close to perfection and excellence as possible in a cost effective manner. It will also

ensure that common problems and ideas for constant improvement are communicated

directly to the PSOTC decision makers.

c. Core Management Process

The core management process at PSOTC is application of NATO Systems Approach to

Training (SAT)5 in scoping, planning, preparation, execution and evaluation of ET solutions

conducted at the Centre. The Quality Assurance Strategy is framed and focused on all SAT

phases in order to provide consistency and quality of ET solutions that would meet

stakeholders’ training requirements. A course or another ET solution would be generated at

PSOTC either as: a NATO requirement based on its TRA and TNA; as a requirement

submitted by higher HQ in the Armed Force of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Ministry of Defence

or Ministry of Security of Bosnia and Herzegovina; as a need which is a result in a change of

PSO doctrine, military technology or as an UN/EU training requirement or an initiative by a

partner agency.

In any case, a training requirement/an initiative, and then if approved by PSOTC Commandant

and the AMB - a course, must go through all NATO SAT phases as instructed below: Training

Needs Analyses; ET Product Design; ET Product Development; Conduct of ET; Evaluation of

ET.

1) Training Needs Analysis

Upon reception of a NATO training requirement/initiated course or a training requirement

coming from another partner agency, PSOTC will adhere to NATO Training Needs Analysis

5 NATO Bi-SC Direcitve 075-007 (Chapter 4-9), 10 Sep 2015

Page 22: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

22

(TNA) process and procedures as per Bi-SCD 075-007 (Chapter 5) and instructions given in

PSOTC SOP 200, taking into account other relevant NATO documents (SAGE, NATO Task

List, TRA, when a training requirement is coming from NATO).

For non-NATO training requirements, the TNA process is trigged by Commandant’s initial

approval of Activity Scoping Paper and decision to turn a training requirement into a new

training solution. Once decision is made to proceed with TNA process, HETD will form a

TNA Working Group (WG), which will be led by representative from ETPD/QMS and

deputized by senior Directing Staff (DS), who will be delegated by Section of Primary

Responsibility (SPR, the section where a developing course would functionally belong to).

Other members of the TNA WG includes: Head of the SPR, experienced DSs, experts from

within and outside of the Armed Forces and MoD of Bosnia and Herzegovina, representatives

of stake holder/s (Requirement Authority, Department Head) as well as SMEs from partner

institutions.

The end products of this phase are Course Control Documents (CCDs) I (as per PSOTC SOP

200), adjusted if needed for non-NATO courses to reflect responsibility hierarchy in the

Centre and relationship with a stakeholder) and CCD II (PSOTC SOP 200), which once

approved by the PSOTC AMB, position a new course into PSOTC’s official curriculum and

annual planning process 14-18 months before the start of calendar year in which the course is

piloted.

2) Education and Training Product Design

The aim of Education and Training Product Design phase is to produce a training solution – a

course or seminar that would enable individuals to obtain the Performance Objectives (PO)

defined in the previous phase of the SAT process IAW Bi-SCD 075-007 (Chapter 5) and

PSOTC SOP 200.

This phase is overseen by a Head of training section (SPR) to which the course belongs to (as

per its functional character) and is led by a CD, who together with the design team (DSs

allocated by HETD through Heads of Training Sections, who have expertise related to the

substance of the developing course and ideally those DSs who will conduct pilot trial of the

course) create a course instructional strategy, which includes what content will be delivered,

how the content will be delivered and, most importantly, how learning will be monitored and

assessed. This strategy is documented in the Course Control Document III (PSOTC SOP 200),

together with a Course Assessment Plan , which will be approved by HETD 12-14 months

before the start of calendar year in which the course is piloted.

Once approved, CCD III, together with other CCDs is stored IAW SOP 300 – Annex N. Any

future change in the CCDs should be result of a course review process and subject of approval

by the AMB and HETD.

3) Education and Training Product Development

Building on CCD III developed in the previous phase, the Education and Training Product

Development phase aims at setting necessary conditions for successful delivery of an ET

product by producing/procuring instructional and assessment materials, requesting support

services, obtaining instructional staff and conducting pilot trials. A CD will in coordination

with a Head of Education and Training Section (HETS) and support staff, lead this phase IAW

Bi-SCD 075-007 (Chapter 7), procedures in PSOTC SOP 200 and those instructions given

below. This phase will be initiated 10-12 months prior the start of calendar year in which the

course is piloted.

Request for supporting course material and services will be requested by a CD through

Annual Requirements Request (as per SOP 200).

Production of student assessment materials will be done by a CD in accordance with a Course

Assessment Plan. Detailed guidelines on Assessment of the Students are given in next phase –

Conduct of ET.

Page 23: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

23

Teaching staff for a course within ETD will be appointed and made available to HETS and a

CD by HETD through Annual ET Management Instruction. Involvement of external speakers

will be closely coordinated with ETPD/QMS in order to define possibilities and resources to

invite external speakers to support delivery of a course. Engagement of external speakers from

international partner institutions will be planed through Annual International Cooperation

Activities Plan by ETPD/QMS IAW SOP 200.

Conduct of pilot trails before a particular course will be executed in order to assess that course

is well developed and responsive to a training requirement. The course trial will include trails

of the key parts within a course (i.e. exercise concepts) through a Directing Staff

(DS=Instructors) Induction Course as well as through the first iterations of a course itself. The

pilot course session will be planned in Annual Training Calendar and it will be delivered to a

group of up to 20 BH-national students. The ETPD/QMS will plan and organize internal

evaluation of the pilot course in cooperation with an external stake holder, HETS and a CD. A

CD will plan a DS Induction Course prior actual pilot course in order to trail key events of the

course, to identify if those events are aligned with provisions of CCD II and III and to bring

all DS involved into the upcoming pilot course to the same level of understanding.

4) Conduct of Education and Training

The Conduct of Education and Training phase includes integration, planning, preparation,

execution and close out activities that would support a specific course IAW Bi-SCD 075-007

(Chapter 8), instructions given in PSOTC SOP 200, SOP 300 – Annex B and those provided

below in order to achieve the ultimate result – graduation of qualified and satisfied course

participants. The figure below outlines timeline for Conduct of Education and Training Phase

(CY represents Calendar Year in which a course will be delivered and D-day represents the

start of a particular course).

Figure 4 – An Outline of Conduct of Education and Training Phase

a) Course Integration

The integration of a specific course in PSOTC’s curriculum starts with approval of CCD I

and II by PSOTC AMB, which would be base to put a course in the Annual Training

PREPARATION

D-(NLT 90-7), CD

- Invitation letters out - Students Application Process - Coord. of DS/external speakers - Course Schedule confirmed - Coord of Admin/Log/Fin Spt.

CONDUCT

D- (7+Last Day ) - DS Induction Week - Daily Spt. Menagament of a Course - Delivery of ET - Student Assessemnt

CLOSE OUT

D+<14

- Post Course Meeting

- Course After Action Report

EVALUATION PHASE

QMC and AMB Meetings

INTEGRATION

CY - (14-12 Months)

- Annual Traning Calendar (HETD) - DS Annual Prof. Dev. Plan (HETD) - CCD III developed (CD) and approved by HETD

PLANNING D - (365-180),

- Confirm DS team, external speakers and number of students (CD) - Review CCD III and incorporate previous PCR inputs (CD) - Anjnual Req.Request /Procurment Plan (S4) - Draft Annual Budget (BUDFIN)

CY- (18-14 Months) Approved

CCD I and II (PSOTC AMB)

Page 24: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

24

Calendar and trigger resource planning. Once a course is in the Annual Training

Calendar, its related documents will be uploaded to ETOC and e-Prime, giving to the

course a code and in case of NATO accredited courses, seek course code from ACT.

The ETPD/QMS is responsible to plan a specific course into the Annual Training

Calendar. Appointed CD will in coordination with Head of Training Section identify

material and services required to support the course through Annual Requirements

Request.

In parallel, HETD will identify professional development requirements for DS and task

ETPD/QMS to develop Annual Professional Plan in order to increase PSOTC’s teaching

competences along with other internal and external activities in this field which is

detailed under point Staff Professional Development in this Chapter.

The key to the integration of a specific course into PSOTC’s curriculum as well as follow

up steps in the process is timely and effective flow of information, which is detailed in

SOP 300 – Annex O.

b) Course Planning

The planning stage of a course starts with confirmation that a particular Course is planned

in Annual Training Calendar by HETD to a CD through HETS, which is done

concurrently with development of Commandants Annual Training Guidelines and

HETD’s Annual Training Management Instruction.

While Commandants’ guidelines sets overall framework for preparation and delivery of

courses in upcoming year, providing guidelines on training objectives and priorities,

resource distribution and provisions on internal coordination and external cooperation

(issued in official languages of BiH), HETD’s Annual Training Management Instruction

details: responsibilities within ETD in terms of training delivery at the Centre and on

MTTs; International Activities Plan; DS Professional Development Plan and Students’

Distribution and Support Plan (issued in English language, as per PSOTC SOP 200).

Once these two documents are released (NLT 6 months prior next CY), a CD will consult

them in order to collect necessary information influencing further steps in preparation of

a course.

At this stage, a CD will integrate Post Course Review (PCR) inputs from previous

iteration of the existing course into CCD III and seek approval from HETD.

c) Course Preparation

Depending on the complexity of a specific course, its preparation time may vary, but in

any case this phase will start NLT D-90, with the first course coordination meeting called

by a CD, who is responsible for a course preparation, conduct and close out – post course

evaluation. A CD executes these activities following established chain of command in

coordination and through Training Section Head to where a specific course belongs to.

The preparation phase last until D-7, when a course is considered to enter into execution

phase with one week pre-course activities.

d) Course Execution

The Course Execution starts one week prior actual teaching and includes: Directing Staff

induction week, Daily support management of the course, Delivery of education and

training, Students’ conduct, Assessment of the students and Course and Instructions

Monitoring.

i. Directing Staff (DS) Induction Week.

Page 25: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

25

The DS Induction Week in will be run a week prior the start of the course in order to

ensure highest quality of delivery of the course and to provide common understanding

and teaching approach to key subjects within a course among teaching DS as well as

to make the last necessary adjustments in lectures/syndicate discussions and exercises.

A CD will prepare a Program for The DS Induction Week which should as minimum

include: external lecturers/DS in processing, introduction to daily routine during the

course, course organization and students’ syndicate distribution, review of key/new

lectures, syndicate discussions and exercises, matters related to the Assessment of

students and Course monitoring.

In addition, the CD should make the last coordination related to: supporting issues,

transportation, reception and accommodation of the students, availability of

HETD/Commandant for opening/closing and course dinner, participation of external

lectures that deserves Commandant’s attention through HETD (OF-5 and above,

Deans/Directors from partner organizations) as well as students syndicate distribution.

In terms of the distribution of the students in syndicates, the CD should pay special

attention to: gender, nationality, service, rank, and resentment or tension between

nations. The configuration of a syndicate would influence its work and overall

atmosphere on the course.

ii. Daily Support Management of the Course.

(1) The CD is the first member of PSOTC with whom the students would have a

contact. Therefore, it is important that students get good impression of the Centre

thorough CD’s engagement in making positive learning environment from the

early beginning.

(2) At the Course briefing, besides information that she/he should provide on the

course given in PSOTC SOP 200, the CD will emphasise instructions regarding

importance of: Students’ Code of Conduct (SOP 300-Annex C); Assessment of

students (SOP 300-Annex D), Student Feedback Form (SOP 300-Annex E) and

Academic Freedom at PSOTC.

(3) The CD should address to the students every morning shortly prior lecturing

making sure that all students needs are addressed and taken care of.

(4) The CD will make sure that external lecturers are provided with pre-arranged

support, escorted, introduced to the students prior their lecture and given a space

where they can work prior or after their lecture.

(5) The CD will organize short Hot Wash Up with DS and external lecturers every

day of the Course in order to reflect on the content and delivery of the course,

students’ engagement and progress and to identify and solve potential issues as a

course progresses. The CD will also check on daily basis if there are observations

or suggestions regarding the course provided by the staff through Staff Lessons

Identified Sheet (SOP 300-Annex F).

iii. Delivery of Education and Training. Detailed instructions for Delivery of Education

and Training are given in PSOTC SOP 200 and SOP 300 – Annex B.

iv. Student Code of Conduct

The PSOTC is an excellent PSO training centre which has earned a strong

international reputation and as such strives to provide the highest quality education

and training to both domestic and international security professionals. In order to

preserve its reputation and professionalism the Centre expects that all personnel,

including the students, adhere to the given Code of Conduct standards.

Page 26: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

26

The Student Code of Conduct is enclosed in SOP 300 - Annex C. It will be available

to all students in electronic version on T:\DOCUMENTS FOR STUDENTS and

reinforced through CD’s Course introductory briefing.

v. Assessment of the Students

In line with Education and Training Management goals which are focused on

delivering the highest quality and internationally recognized education and training at

PSOTC, the Centre conducts Assessment of the Students by using formative and

summative type of assessments, depending on a course. The policy and procedures on

Assessment of the students are given in SOP 300-Annex D.

vi. Course and Instructions Monitoring

The Directing Staff (DS) and lecturers will be formally observed when delivering

instructions at PSOTC IAW Bi-SCD 075-007 (Chapter 8 and its Annex S). The

monitoring of instructional performance of DS/lecturers will be conducted to assess:

consistency of content of the lecture with CCD III; delivery techniques and

effectiveness of course design - in order to ensure continuous improvement of

instructional effectiveness and strategy. The monitoring of instructions will be done in

accordance with a SOP 300 – Annex G.

Course Monitoring Plan will be drafted by respective HETS and approved by HETD.

The monitoring will be executed by HETS (SPR), HETD or the Commandant.

Observations during monitoring will be recorded and debriefed to a DS/lecturer IAW

SOP 300 – Annex G, which will be stored in HETD’s files.

In addition, on case by case basis and during a particular pilot courses, PSOTC will

engage external evaluation personnel/SMEs from community of interests to conduct

Course monitoring in order to assess alignment of the course with CCDs – the focus is

to make overall improvement of the course design. Course Monitoring also provides

an opportunity to verify that instructors have the prerequisite qualifications and

training is satisfied. Once the course is finished, the evaluator will debrief CD and

submit Course Monitoring Report (as per SOP 300 – Annex H) to HETS, ETPD/QMS

and HETD.

e) Course Close Out – The First Stage of Post Course Review

The Course Close Out starts immediately after finishing of the course and will be finalized

within two weeks following the end of the course. The Course Close Out is the first stage of

the Post Course Review (PCR) process, which will be extended with its second stage during

next SAT phase - Evaluation and Education of Training, that is instructed below. The Course

Close Out – The First Stage of PCR is focused on the course that has been just delivered and

aims at capturing the first impressions on the conduct of the course, students’ and

instructors’ reactions on the course and support issues that may have impact on the next

iteration of the course. Detailed instructions on Course Close Out – First Stage of PCR are

given in SOP 300 - Annex I.

5) Evaluation of Education and Training

Evaluation of Education and Training aims at identification of strength and weaknesses related

to the course and its delivery, which will be addressed in post course period in order to keep

momentum of constant improvement of processes and procedures within the Centre.

This phase has two distinctive parts: Internal and External Evaluation. The core of Internal

Evolution is the PCR process, which is executed in two stages. The first stage of the PCR is

executed immediately after the courses during the Course Close Out (as prescribed above),

while the second stage of the PCR is done through Quality Assurance Committee (QMC) and

Academic Management Board (AMB) sessions. The instructions for the scope of work of the

Page 27: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

27

QMC and the AMB are given in SOP 300 – Annex J and Annex K, respectively. In addition,

the Commandant will seek feedback, initiatives and recommendations for improvement of

general management and ET activities at the Centre from Cooperation Committee (COOPC), as

instructed in SOP 300 - Annex L.

The External evaluation is focused on feedback from operational environment provided by

course graduates, their supervisors and members of community of interest in order to assess if a

training requirement has been met through the course attended by the course participants. The

External evaluation will be managed by ETPD/QMS and it will be conducted six months after

the end of the course. The inputs for External evaluation will be collected through questionnaire

(IAW Bi-SC 075-007, Chapter 9) that will be sent to the course graduates by email. The second

sources of information for the External evaluation will be Annual Meeting of Friends of PSOTC

during which ETPD/QMS will conduct focused interviews with external stakeholders

(representatives of operational HQs, international partners from national MODs, UN, NATO,

OSCE etc.). The collected information will be analyzed, presented at QMC and followed up by

ETPD/QMS.

5. External institutional evaluation

The External institutional evaluation will be performed by NATO ACT IAW Bi-SC 075-007

through on-site visits and Annual QA Report. Secondly, TRADOC AF BiH will evaluate the

Centre through on-site visits and regular periodical reports and briefings (monthly, quarterly, bi-

annual and annual). Thirdly, the partner agencies (UN, OSCE, and Ministry of Security of BiH)

and countries will be submitted annual report on Center’s performance during annual Meeting

Friends of PSOTC.

6. Institutional self-assessment

The Institutional self-assessment will be conducted through national quarterly and bi-annual

Training Briefings, QMC meetings and meetings of the AMB.

7. Directing Staff professional development

The Directing Staff (DS) are those officers and NCOs in Education and Training Department who

are required in the normal course of their duties to impart core course material to the student body.

The DS’ primary responsibility is teaching. They are also responsible for mentoring, guiding and

leading the students. Additional responsibilities for experienced DSs are related to preparation,

organization and execution of courses and other training events.

In order to insure development and maintenance of instructor’s proficiency to common and

acceptable standards, PSOTC will support instructor’s continuing development through Directing

Staff Professional Development Programme. The Directing Staff Professional Development

Programme of three phases as follows: Orientation, Induction and Follow up training. The

Programme will be development and coordinated by ETPD/QMS on behalf of HEDT IAW SOP

300 – Annex M.

8. Information systems and knowledge management

In order to maintain and sustain effective management of the core processes and the culture of

continuous improvement at the Centre, PSOTC will establish the system and procedures for

effective information and knowledge management, collection, record and tracking of relevant

information related to ET activities IAW SOP 300 – Annex N.

9. Communication and Public Affairs

The internal communication as well the external communication with the stake holders, potential

customers and the community of interest is a vital for the effective management within the

organization and one of the key factors influencing credibility of training and overall positive

Page 28: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

28

perception of PSOTC. Therefore, the PSOTC staff will adhere to the Instructions on

Communication and Public Affairs given in SOP 300 – Annex O.

10. Annexes:

A. Responsibilities of Course Director and Course Administrator

B. Instructions on Conduct of Education and Training

C. Student Code of Conduct

D. Assessment of the Students

E. Template - Student Feedback Form

F. Template - Staff Lessons Identified Sheet

G. Instructions Monitoring Report

H. Course Monitoring Report

I. Instructions on Course Close Out – First Stage of Post Course Review

J. Instructions on Quality Management Committee

K. Instructions on Academic Management Board

L. Organization and conduct of Cooperation Committee

M. Directing staff professional development

N. Information systems and knowledge management

O. Communication and Public Affairs

Page 29: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

29

SOP 300 - Annex A

Responsibilities of a Course Director and a Course Administrator

1. Course Director’s Responsibilities

A Course Director (CD) is responsible for/to:

a. General

1) As a SME to take a part in Scoping and TNA WG, which is tasked to turn a training

requirement into a training solution.

2) Development and maintenance of CCD III, a course preparation, conduct and close out –

post course evaluation.

3) Production of instructional material includes getting reference books and manuals for

instructional staff and the students, handouts for the students, production of maps and

overlay as well as student assessment materials in accordance with a Course Assessment

Plan.

4) A CD will request course supporting material through Annual Procurement Request.

5) Identify requirements for external speakers/role players, invite them and coordinate their

reception/stay during the course.

6) A CD is responsible for coordination of all external agencies involved in support and

execution of the course as well as preparation of filed exercises/study trips.

7) A CD will coordinate internal support of the course through Course Administrator who

will be tasked as per this Annex.

b. In the period from D-90 to NLT D-30:

1) Confirm if course will be held as per Annual Training Calendar or rescheduled.

2) Consult the latest version of HETD’ Annual Training Management Instruction.

3) Prepare a draft Course Schedule and seek its approval.

4) Conduct 1st Coordination Meeting.

5) Draft and distribute 1st Coordination Meeting Minutes.

6) Draft Course and External Speakers/Role Players Invitation Letters and send them

through Registry Office and monitor students subscription to the course.

7) Draft and send out request for execution of Filed Exercise/Trip to supporting/effected

authorities.

8) Distribute teaching responsibilities within assigned DS team and seek for approval to

distribute teaching responsibilities to other DS outside of the assigned team, if required.

9) Plan and coordinate preparations of DS assigned team and DS Induction week.

10) Follow up on students’ subscription and coordinate with external partners until next

Coordination Meeting.

c. In the period from D-30 to NLT D-15:

1) Confirm number of international (NLT D-30) and national – BiH (D-20) applied for the

course and seek for approval if the course will be held or rescheduled. If the course will

be rescheduled, inform effected participants/authorities, if no change – proceed with

follow up steps of the course preparation.

2) Send out Student Joining Instruction for NATO ACT sponsored students (NLT D-25, as

per SOP for International Activities) once number of these students is confirmed by

ETPD/QMS.

3) Send list of proposed participation of VIPs guests at Course Cloning Ceremony for

approval to HETD. Once approved, send out invitation letters and indicate PA/PR as POC

who will follow up on preparations and reception of the VIP guest.

4) Draft Course Supporting Requirements Matrix.

5) Conduct Coordination Meeting.

6) Draft Course Administrative Instruction and once approved, distribute the Instruction

(NLT D-15) within the Centre and outside, if required.

7) Follow up and coordinate transport, accommodation, meals, refreshments, access cards to

Camp EUFOR, production of training material, social and cultural activities for the

Page 30: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

30

students and external speakers/role players (and other supporting needs as per Course

Supporting Requirements Matrix).

d. NLT D-7:

1) Conduct the final Coordination Meeting and release Coordination Meeting Minutes.

2) Prepare and start execution of the DS Induction week.

3) Confirm provision of transport, accommodation, meals, refreshments access cards to

Camp EUFOR, production of training material, social and cultural activities for the

students and external speakers/role players (and other supporting needs as per Course

Supporting Requirements Matrix).

4) Confirm readiness and availability of IT and linguistic support.

5) Make students syndicate distribution and seating plan.

6) Confirm availability and readiness of course venues (auditorium and syndicate rooms) and

hand over keys of Syndicate Rooms to DS, who are responsible for the room for the

duration of the course.

7) Prepare printing materials for Student’s Welcome Packages.

8) Issue Course Schedule and Course Background Brief.

9) Confirm participation of external speakers that deserves special attention of

Commandant’s Office in the course and availability of HETD and PSOTC Commandant

for opening, course dinner and closing ceremony as well as participation of VIPs at the

Course Closing Ceremony.

10) Confirm and coordinate reception of international and national students as per the Course

Schedule.

11) Confirm that CA has arranged in processing activities as per the Course Schedule.

e. On D Day – Start of the course:

1) Report number of students arrived on the course by 0900hrs.

2) Make sure that CA coordinates reception and escort of the students into Camp EUFOR

and PSOTC as well as that Student Welcome Package is handed over to the students on

their arrival to the Centre.

3) Conduct the first welcome address to the students; introduce CA and yourself, prior

following in processing activities.

4) Make sure that CA coordinates in processing activities as per Course Schedule.

5) Moderate Course Opening Session;

6) Coordinate preparations and participation of HETD and Commandant at Course Photo.

7) Make sure that refreshments are ready for Ice-breaker after the Course photo session.

8) Conduct Course Introductory Briefing with emphases on: introduction of DS Team,

Course aim and ELOs, Content of the Course Schedule, Student Code of Conduct,

Academic Freedom, Course Duty Student, Student Feedback Form and obligatory course

social activities.

9) Make sure that CA delivers admin/log support details through Course Admin Briefing.

10) Welcome guest speakers, provide working space in dedicated venue where refreshments

for the speakers should be served and introduce guest speakers to the students. Upon

complication of a lecture, thank to a guest lecture, hand over Certificate of Appreciation,

provide her/him with feedback and make sure that she/he is escorted for lunch (if

applicable)/outside of the Camp and has transport provided.

11) Conduct daily hot wash-up with the DS Team.

f. From D-Day to the last week of the course

1) Every morning, make short address to the students reflecting on previous day and

introduce the activities of the day and make sure that all students’ needs are addressed.

2) Make sure that CA arranged Sarajevo Orientation tour on the first Wednesday of the

course and briefed the students on details.

3) Make sure that the students are filing Student Feedback Form at the end of each day.

4) Conduct DS Clinics prior complex exercises as required.

5) Provide and coordinate support to the external speakers as per SOP 200.

6) Make sure that CA has requested and provided required daily support for the course.

7) Conduct daily hot wash-up with the DS Team.

8) Participate in weekly Training Coordination Meetings run by HETD.

Page 31: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

31

9) Execute other tasks as given in the main body of the SOP 200.

g. On D + Last Wednesday of the course:

1) Confirm details for Closing ceremony (if required call coordination meeting with those

involved in support): availability of the Commandant, participation of VIP guest and draft

Program of the Ceremony.

2) Remind students to finalize Student Feedback Form.

3) Make sure that CA has made necessary arrangements of course dinner and conducts

briefing for students’ participation on Thursday evening and identify any dietary

exceptions.

4) Send link to S-6, requesting preparation of Course CD for the students.

5) Prepare Student Report (when applicable) and Course Certificates and send for signature

by the Commandant.

h. On D + Last Thursday of the course:

1) Make sure that CA requested and coordinated transportation for international students

from the Centre to Sarajevo International Airport after the course is ended.

2) Coordinate last changes in Closing Ceremony and confirm with PA/PR participation of

external media at the Closing Ceremony.

3) Prepare concept note for moderation of Closing Ceremony.

4) Make sure that refreshments are ordered for course farewell after the closing Ceremony.

5) Collect Student Feedback Form.

6) Make sure that CA produced seating plan for Course official dinner. Arrive at a restaurant

where course official dinner will take place and make final confirmation of the

arrangements prior arrival of other participants of the event.

7) Confirm if HETD, CO and COS, DS Team or other guests will be participating in Course

official dinner. After the dinner, close the bill and verify costumers’ satisfaction by

signing it. Make sure that expenditure for Course official dinner are within provided

budget as per BiH national regulations.

i. On D + Last Day of the course:

1) Make sure that CA is coordinating out – processing activities.

2) Organize student – DS debriefing session per syndicates.

3) Address to the class and make final farewell remarks prior the Closing Ceremony.

4) Make sure that Course Certificates and students CDs are ready for distribution to the

students during Closing Ceremony.

5) Make sure that seating plan for Closing Ceremony for VIPs and guest is coordinated with

CSM and PR/PA.

6) Moderate the course Closing Ceremony.

7) Take a part in Course Farewell refreshment after the Closing Ceremony.

8) Ensure all plastic nametag holders, student ID and PSOTC access card are collected by

the CA or delivered by the students to a driver on the departure from PSOTC.

j. By D + 14:

1) Analyze DS Lesson Identified Sheet and Student Feedback Form.

2) Call for Post Course Review Meeting.

3) Write Course After Action Report.

2. Responsibilities of Course Administrator

A Course Administrator is responsible to a Course Director for/to:

a. General

1) Coordinate activities in all three phases according to this Annex.

2) Coordinate transport, accommodation, meals, refreshments, access cards to Camp

EUFOR, social and cultural activities for the students and external speakers/role players

and other supporting needs with respective staff sections according to the Course

Supporting Requirements Matrix.

3) Participate at Coordination Meetings and draft Meeting Minutes.

Page 32: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

32

b. In the period from D-90 to NLT D-30:

1) Keep track on students’ subscription,

2) Create the list of participants and inform the CD.

c. In the period from D-30 to NLT D-15:

1) Confirm number of international (NLT D-30) and national – BiH students (D-20)

2) Submit List of course participants to BUDFIN section for approval of entitlement of

accommodation and meals.

3) After approval by BUDFIN, CA will submit list of participants, copy of individual

application and copy of ID to S-3 for provision of students ID cards to access Camp

EUFOR.

4) The CA will also submit a list of participants and copy of individual applications to S-1

for Students’ Demographic Database.

5) Provide estimate regarding transport, accommodation, meals, ice-breaker, refreshments,

cultural activities, official dinner and other supporting needs that will be used as in puts

for creation of the Course Supporting Requirements Matrix.

d. In the period from D-7 to NLT D-Day

1) Check readiness and availability of IT and linguistic support.

2) Provide transportation request matrix and coordinate reception of international and

national students and guest speakers.

3) Coordinate with Finance Office timing for payment of course fee by the international

students, where applicable.

4) Collect and fold Student’s Welcome Packages and label folders according to the

confirmed list of participants.

5) Set-up students’ labels in auditorium according the seating plan

6) Submit list of participants distributed per syndicates to IT section for creation of student’s

accounts and preparation of laptops for the students.

e. On D Day – Start of the course:

1) Check number of students arrived and inform CD by 08:30 hrs

2) Coordinates in processing activities as per Course Schedule

3) Deliver Administrative briefing (Admin/Logistic details, Camp Butmir rules, Orientation

Tour, Official dinner, daily routine and support).

4) Coordinate coffee and refreshments for Ice-Breaker 5) Coordinate Course photo

f. From D-Day to the last week of the course

1) Coordinate coffee and refreshments

2) Coordinate Sarajevo Orientation tour on the first Wednesday of the course and conducts

briefing for students.

3) Make necessary arrangements of course dinner (seating plan, dietary exceptions,

confirmations, etc.) and conducts briefing for students’ participation on Thursday

evening.

4) Provide required daily support for the course.

5) Coordinate transportation for international students from the Centre to Sarajevo

International Airport after the course is ended.

6) Print out Student Reports (when applicable) and Course Certificates

7) Coordinate production of course CDs and prepare them for distribution.

8) Conduct briefing and coordinate out – processing activities.

9) Collect all plastic nametag holders, student ID and PSOTC access card.

10) Execute other tasks as given in the main body of the SOP 200.

g. By D + 14

1) Provide Course costs overview

2) Submit proposals for course improvement

3) Take a part in Post Course Review Meeting.

Page 33: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

33

SOP 300 - Annex B

Instructions on Conduct of Education and Training

The Conduct of Education and Training at PSOTC will include: integration, planning, preparation,

execution and close out activities; as instructed bellow:

1. Course Integration

The integration of a specific course in PSOTC’s curriculum starts with approval of CCD I and II by

PSOTC AMB, which would be base to put a course in Annual Training Calendar and trigger

resource planning (request of material and services and financial support) . Once a course is in the

Annual Training Calendar, its related documents will be uploaded to ETOC and e-Prime, giving to

the course a code and in case of NATO accredited courses, seek course code from ACT.

The ETPD/QMS is responsible to plan a specific course into the Annual Training Calendar.

Appointed CD will in coordination with Section Head identify material and services required to

support the course and submit a course procurement request to the ETPD/QMS. The ETPD/QMS

will make ETD Annual Procurement Request and submit to S4 who will after that draft PSOTC’s

Annual Requirements Request and submit to higher HQ by the end of Jan of the current CY for

next CY. Once PSOTC’s Annual Requirements Request is approved by higher HQ, S4 will in

coordination with BUDFIN Section, ETPD/QMS and CDs draft Annual Procurement Plan and

submit to higher HQ by the end of Jun for next CY. The Annual Procurement Plan and other

material and service requirements for functioning of the Centre will serve as base for PSOTC

Annual Budget that will be drafted by PSOTC BUDFIN Section and submitted to higher HQ for

approval by the end of Jul for next CY.

In parallel, HETD will identify professional development requirements for DS and task

ETPD/QMS to develop Annual Professional Plan in order to increase PSOTC’s teaching

competences along with other internal and external activities in this field which is detailed under

point Staff Professional Development in this Chapter.

2. Course Planning

The planning stage of a course starts with confirmation that a particular Course is planned in

Annual Training Calendar by HETD to a CD, which is done concurrently with development of

Commandants Annual Training Guidelines and HETD’s Annual Training Management Instruction.

While Commandants’ guidelines sets overall framework for preparation and delivery of courses in

upcoming year, providing guidelines on training objectives and priorities, resource distribution and

provisions on internal coordination and external cooperation (issued in official languages of BiH),

HETD’s Annual Training Management Instruction details: responsibilities within ETD in terms of

training delivery at the Centre and on MTTs; International Activities Plan; DS Professional

Development Plan and Students’ Distribution and Support Plan (issued in English language, as per

template enclosed in SOP 200). Once these two documents are released (NLT 6 months prior next

CY), a CD will consult them in order to collect necessary information influencing further steps in

preparation of a course.

At this stage, a CD will integrate Post Course Review (PCR) inputs form previous iteration of an

existing course into CCD III and seek approval from HETD.

A CD will also make initial coordination with partner agencies and other stakeholders that will be

included in a course delivery.

3. Course Preparation

Depending on the complexity of a specific course, its preparation time may vary, but in any case

this phase will start NLT D-90, with the first course coordination meeting called by a CD, who is

responsible for a course preparation, conduct and close out – post course evaluation. A CD

Page 34: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

34

executes these activities following established chain of command in coordination and through

Training Section Head to where a specific course belongs to.

At this stage, a CD will have at her/his disposal a Course Administrator (CA) and DS team

confirmed by HETD. The preparation phase last until D-7, when a course is considered to enter

into execution phase with one week pre-course activities, which are detailed in next step of course

conduct.

Following instructions are not necessarily given in particular sequence, but many of them are

executed concurrently throughout preparation of a course (more detailed instructions are given in

PSOTC SOP 200 and Annex SOP 300 – Annex B):

a. Course Coordination Meetings. There will be at least three mandatory Course Coordination

Meetings during a course preparatory phase. The first Course Coordination Meeting that takes

place NLT D-90 which aims at an initial information exchange and serves as a de-conflicting

mechanism in terms of resources, constraints as well as for coordination of all staff support

requirements. In addition, during this meeting a CD should confirm final students’ distribution

on a course, available sponsorships for international students, possibility for inviting external

speakers and any other issue which would enable a CD to send invitation letters after the

Meeting.

The 2nd

Course Coordination Meeting will take place NLT D-30, after the closure of students’

application process in order ensure no external interference with a course, situational awareness

and synchronization of efforts between supported and supporting elements within the Centre.

As a part of preparation of the meeting a CD should have drafted all Course Supporting

Requirements Matrix (which will become an annex to Course Administrative Instruction in

upcoming steps of course preparations). After the 2nd

Course Coordination Meeting, but NLT

D-15, a CD will draft Course Administrative Instruction in English language (as per Template

in SOP 200) and once approved by HETD, disseminate the document in electronic version to all

section heads in the Centre.

The 3rd

Course Coordination Meeting will be held NLT D-7 in order to make final coordination

of preparations for a course. A CD will determine level and profile of participation at different

Course Coordination Meetings. A CD will make sure that each Course Coordination Meeting is

recorded as per template given at SOP 100-Annex C, stored as per SOP 300 – Annex N. A CD

is free to organize any other coordination meeting other than those mentioned above. During

Weekly Training Coordination Meetings, organized by HETD, a CD will provide a short update

on a progress of preparations of a course.

b. Invitation letters. Based on Students’ Distribution and Support Plan, a CD will draft invitation

letters for the students and external speakers and once approved by HETD and signed by the

Commandant, make sure there are sent out by Registry Office NLT D-90 (Template of a Course

Invitation Letter is at SOP 200). For NATO accredited courses, a scanned copy of students’

invitation letters should be sent to ETPD/QMS to be uploaded on e-Prime. Application deadline

on all courses for international students is by D-30 and for BH students is by D-20.

External speakers for a course can usually be provided by the community of interest (PTECs,

NATO COEs), governmental and non-governmental agencies or partner agencies. Where

possible and appropriate, the CD must identify more than one guest speaker or supporting

speaker for each subject and alternate participation from each to maintain speaker relevance.

Invitation of external speakers must be cleared by a CD with HETD before sending an

invitation letter. A sample invitation letters for external speakers is in SOP 200.

c. Post-Application Procedures. Once students’ application process is closed, a CA will submit

List of course participants to BUDFIN section for approval of entitlement of accommodation

and meals. After approval, BUDFIN Section will submit list of participants to S-3. The CA will

submit copy of individual application and copy of ID to S-3 for provision of students ID cards

to access Camp EUFOR NLT D-15 for all students. The CA will also submit a list of

participants and copy of individual applications to S-1 for Students’ Demographic Database and

Page 35: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

35

to S-6 for preparation of student’s accounts and preparation of laptops as well as draft and send

Visa Support Letter to a nation requiring such document (as per template in SOP 200).

d. Support to external speakers. Depending on existing arrangements between PSOTC and partner

agency, in general PSOTC will provide to international speakers: transport from/to International

Airport Sarajevo – a hotel – PSOTC- a hotel for duration of engagement; accommodation and

meals. PSOTC will provide to the national external speakers: transport in the area of Sarajevo,

accommodation and meals (if entitled as per national regulations). A CD will submit speaker’s

supporting requirements through Course Supporting Requirements Matrix. PSOTC will not

provide honorarium for lecturing to any external speaker.

e. Speaker Gifts. A CD should prepare the Certificate of Appreciation for external speakers, which

will be handed over by a CD or by PSOTC Commandant for speakers ranking OF-6 and above

or civilian equivalent.

f. Accommodation and Meals. PSOTC will provide and cover expenses for accommodation and

meals on the Camp EUFOR for international sponsored students and national students (as per

national regulations). PSOTC will also provide accommodation and meals on the Camp

EUFOR for International non-sponsored students, but they will pay expenses for these services

to EUFOR. International non-sponsored students are free to stay outside Camp Butmir in

nearby hotels, but daily transportation to/from PSOTC is their own responsibility.

g. Transportation. A CD should make sure to request transportation for international students

from/to International Airport or Railway/Bus Station Sarajevo in a Course Supporting

Requirements Matrix.

h. Refreshments. A CD will request coffee and bottled water for the students and speakers to be

served in the students’ common room twice a day as per Course Program. Refreshments served

on the first Monday morning, after taking a course photo, should be used as an icebreaker for

the students and the staff (obligatory attendance for: Commandant, COS, HETD, Training

Section Head responsible for the course, CD and course DSs). Refreshments served on the

morning of the last day of the course, after graduation ceremony, should be used as a farewell

function attended by the students and the staff (attendance the same as for the icebreaker).

i. Visitor Access. The visitors to a course will be escorted by S-3 Section based on CD’s request

in accordance with existing rules and regulations on the subject.

j. Field Exercises/Study Trip. If the course contains a field exercise or study trip, a CD should

establish contact with the affected authorities as early as possible to explore feasibility of

conducting an exercise in a particular area. Once arranged, a CD will draft a written formal

request and once signed by the Commandant, follow up and liaise with the HQ/agency as

necessary to conduct initial planning.

k. Linguistic Services. If required, S6 will provide equipment for interpretation, but partner agency

will provide the interpreters;

l. IT Support.

1) VTC support should be coordinated with S6 as soon as possible to provide timely and

quality support.

2) The main drive for information management within ET domain is shared T-drive on

PSOTC’s server. The Instructions on Information Management is given in SOP 300 – Annex

N.

3) Based on the students syndicate list submitted by the CA to the Section S-6, the Section

will prepare accounts for the students that would enable them to access students’ shared drives

at PSOTC as well as to prepare laptops that will be handed over to the students during In

processing phase for each course by S-4. Exceptional cases, when laptops will not be handed

Page 36: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

36

over to the students will be announced by the CD to the Section S-6 through Course

Supporting Requirements Matrix.

m. Video recording. Based on CDs request, S-6 will provide a photographer to make a course

photo on the first Monday morning of the course, after course opening as well as during any

other required photo-coverage in the course.

n. Social and Cultural Activities. PSOTC will cover expenses for guided Sarajevo orientation tour

for the students, which should be planned on the first Wednesday afternoon and requested by a

CD. PSOTC will cover expenses for formal course dinner on each course, which should be

planned on the last Thursday evening of the course and requested by a CD.

o. Course Schedule. A CD will draft a Course Schedule as per template given in SOP 200, and

publish it electronically to all section heads on Thursdays afternoon for upcoming week,

together with the Course Background Brief (only for Week1 of the course, using template in

SOP-200). The Course Background Brief is a one pager intended to provide an overview of the

course and to keep key personnel in the Centre informed prior the start of the course as well as

the document will serve as a base for an article about the start of the course, which will be

drafted and published by PR Officer. Printed version of a Course Schedule will be delivered to

the students and posted on notice boards in Auditorium and halls in the basement and first floor

in the Centre.

As a daily routine, courses will run from 0815 – 1545 hrs Mon-Thu and 0815-1200 on Friday.

This, coupled with homework will enable the course to complete its syllabus and also, enable

BiH students to get a break over the weekend without travelling home late on a Friday nights as

well as to align PSOTC’s daily routine with BiH national working regulations. However, if a

course curriculum requires, in exceptional cases, working day might be extended. As a

minimum, the following administrative items should be included in the schedule:

1) In processing activities on arrival of the students on Monday morning (Briefings by Fire

Department Security Briefing, Mine Awareness Briefing, IT, HOTO of laptops and

students training material).

2) Administrative briefing delivered by Course Administrator.

3) Course opening by a member HETD.

4) A CD Course Briefing, to include aim, ELOs, as stated in the CCD, the course schedule,

and the code of conduct for the course.

5) Time for taking the course photo on Monday morning after course opening and icebreaker

afterwards.

6) Tuition payment on the first Monday morning during lunch time.

7) Sarajevo guided orientation tour on the first Wednesday afternoon of the course.

8) Official Dinner on the last Thursday evening of the course.

9) Close Closing Ceremony on the last Friday morning by the Commandant, followed by

Course Farwell Function (refreshments).

10) Out-processing briefing on the last Thursday afternoon by a Course Administrator.

p. Course Related Material. Pre-reading material can be posted to the Students shared drive:

T:\DOCUMENTS FOR STUDENTS, at the CD discretion. In addition, specific

UNCLASSIFIED information to registered students can be sent by email by CD in advance. All

course-related UNCLASSIFIED materials (e.g., documents, manuals, treaties, hand-outs,

Page 37: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

37

presentations and Course photo) will be burned by S6 on a CD and handed over to CA for the

students to be handed over during Course graduation ceremony.

q. Classroom Preparation. On the Friday prior to the course, the CD with support of S4 will

prepare the classroom and inventory in both the main classroom and any syndicate rooms in

accordance with in the Course Supporting Requirement Matrix. Students Welcome packages

(with students ID, map of Camp EUFOR, Course Schedule, Students Feedback Form, a pen and

A5 notebook) should be prepared at PSOTC’s reception.

4. Course Execution

The Course Execution starts one week prior actual teaching activities and includes: Directing Staff

Induction Week, Daily support management of the course, Delivery of education and training,

Students’ conduct, Assessment of the students and Course and Instructions Monitoring.

a. Directing Staff (DS) Induction Week.

The DS Induction Week in will be run a week prior the start of the course in order to ensure

highest quality of delivery of the course and to provide common understanding and teaching

approach to key subjects within a course among teaching DS as well as to make the last

necessary adjustments in lectures/syndicate discussions and exercises. A CD will prepare a

Program for The DS Induction Week which should as minimum include: external lecturers/DS

in processing, introduction to daily routine during the course, course organization and

students’ syndicate distribution, review of key/new lectures, syndicate discussions and

exercises, matters related to the Assessment of students and Course monitoring.

However, depending of complexity of the course, a CD could plan DS Induction longer than a

week or to run DS Clinics during the course before major exercises. During this week the CD

should have received all external lectures presentations and pre-reading material, which is

already reviewed and shaped to meet ELOs during Preparation phase of the course.

In addition, the CD should make the last coordination related to: supporting issues,

transportation, reception and accommodation of the students, availability of

HETD/Commandant for opening/closing and course dinner, participation of external lectures

that deserves Commandant’s attention through HETD (OF-5 and above, Deans/Directors from

partner organizations) as well as students syndicate distribution. In terms of the distribution of

the students in syndicates, the CD should pay special attention to: gender, nationality, service,

rank, and resentment or tension between nations. The configuration of a syndicate would

influence its work and overall atmosphere on the course.

b. Daily Support Management of the Course

1) The CD is the first member of PSOTC with whom the students would have a contact.

Therefore, it is important that students get good impression of the Centre thorough CD’s

engagement in making positive learning environment for the early beginning.

2) At the Course briefing, the CD will emphasise:

a) Students’ Code of Conduct and obligation of all to adhere to it.

b) Student Feedback Form should be prepared by CD in e-version (as per template in

SOP 300-Annex E) as well as Staff Lessons Identified Sheet (as per template in SOP

300 – Annex F) during Preparation phase of the course. The feedback from the

students and the staff is valuable tool to collect their views and inputs on the course,

which PSOTC highly appreciates. All Forms should be filled in and stored as per SOP

300 – Annex N. For those missing Forms, the CD should ask for them before the start

of the lectures on Friday morning.

Page 38: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

38

c) Academic Freedom at PSOTC is based on Chatham House Rule,6 which is the

milestone for free and opened academic discussion during the course, without

attribution to an originator.

3) The CD should address to the students every morning shortly prior lecturing making sure

that all students needs are addressed and taken care of.

4) The CD will make sure that external lecturers are provided with pre-arranged support,

escorted, introduced to the students prior their lecture and given a space where they can

work prior or after their lecture.

5) The CD will organize short Hot Wash Up with DS and external lecturers every day of the

Course in order to reflect on the content and delivery of the course, students’ engagement

and progress and to identify and solve potential issues as a course progresses.

c. Delivery of Education and Training.

The following methods of training are used at the PSOTC:

1) Lectures. Lectures are delivered in the main auditorium. The majority of lecturers are the

PSOTC DS, but they are also delivered by external lecturers. The standard length of a

lecture is 45 min, including time for questions. Lecturers should:

Be aware that the audience is listening to a foreign language and therefore pace

themselves accordingly.

Provide slides in the standard PSOTC format (template at SOP 200).

Provide/store (at a course folder on T-drive) a copy of the presentation with pre-

reading material to the CD as required by her/him.

2) Syndicate Room Discussions (SRD). The SRD are the core method of delivering

instruction and ensuring understanding of delivered subject matter. Although DS will

develop their own style of instructing syndicates, they must be thoroughly prepared and

ensure that:

The students make a fair contribution in discussions, encouraging those more

reticent.

However widely the argument ranges, the correct lessons are eventually brought out.

These lessons will be specified in the syndicate discussion „DS SOLUTION“ as a

possible solution.

A „DS SOLUTION“ is the guidance issued by a tutorial/exercise author to the DS in

order to allow the syndicate DS to guide the students. It is not to be issued to

students. At the very minimum a pink must contain:

- References so that each DS can conduct their own research well in advance.

- Aim of the discussion

- Time allocated.

- Key Lessons to be drawn out.

- A suggested sequence – every DS will have her/his own style, and therefore this

should be loose guideline except where it is absolutely necessary to follow a

sequence to get to the answers. What is set in the stone is the aim of the lesson

and the key lessons that need to be brought out.

- A summary

6 More on Chatham House Rule at https://www.chathamhouse.org/about/chatham-house-rule

Page 39: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

39

The DS SOLUTION is never to be on display. DS should use some form of folder to

disguise it and should not refer to it slavishly.

After some experience, DS will work out their own way of preparing for syndicate

work. At the beginning, new DS may find it most useful and effective to base a

syndicate period upon a plan which includes:

- The essential facts which must be covered during discussion and a time-table.

- The allocation of questions to students.

- Points for opening and summing-up.

Students are not allowed access to DS NOTES except when appointed as chairmen,

in which case they should be allowed to see the notes, or a précis of these by the DS,

in sufficient time to allow appropriate preparation.

DS should regard their syndicate discussions as an exercise involving a gathering of

officers, all with varied experience, each with something to contribute and all trying

to find a sensible answer to a problem, assisted and directed by the DS themselves.

With DS assistance and direction the syndicate discussion is intended to present

students with the opportunity to explore and learn more about the subject covered.

The amount of direction needed will be greater at the beginning of the Course than at

the end, and DS must learn to assess the degree of intervention required to prevent

fruitless and ill-informed discussion.

The DS are to avoid: talking too much themselves and taking control too frequently

or too obviously; giving the impression that they are trying to catch students out;

following the DS SOLUTION slavishly, rather than basing discussion on

worthwhile students’ ideas or solutions; setting themselves up as experts.

The successful handling of a syndicate requires a sound knowledge of the subject.

Therefore it is recommended to have DS Clinic or shorter coord meetings of

Syndicate DS and DS in charge of the subject matter at least a day prior the SRD.

3) Tutorial Exercises. Tutorial exercises take place regularly on a

course and are designed to take students step by step through complicated processes.

Before every tutorial a short DS clinic will be run to ensure that the DS are comfortable

with the subject and have the same understanding of the concept and methodology.

It is incumbent upon every DS to have the moral courage to tell the tutorial author when

they are not familiar enough with the material to teach it. It is also incumbent on every

individual to do the necessary extra research to become thoroughly familiar with the

subject. Tutorials will vary in style and depth from subject to subject, given the time

available. They are critical activities as they are key enabler for the students to reach ELOs.

The students will require advance guidance to references, as will DS.

4) Exercises. A variety of different exercises take place during the

courses, each of which have differing aims, but are primarily designed to assess students’

ability to apply what they have been taught in practice. The common aim in each of them is

to promote teamwork, as almost all the exercise are done in syndicate or sub syndicate

groups. They include (but are not limited to) the following types of exercises: Map

Exercises (MAPEX; Tactical Exercises Without Troops (TEWT) and Command Post

Exercises (CPX).

Page 40: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

40

A variety of exercises, whether they are TEWTs, CPXs or MAPEXES are integral to a

course instruction. Each will have its own specific detailed requirement, but in outline, an

exercise author appointed by a CD, should cover following items:

A Covering Letter - indented to set out the context and purpose of the exercise whilst

giving direction to staff.

Paperwork for Students - designed to enable students to participate fully in the

exercise. It must include as a minimum:

- Scenario, which should be drawn from the common scenario.

- Detailed paperwork to the correct standard emanating from higher HQs.

- Clear direction as to the requirement.

- Maps, overlays and sketches.

- Supporting paperwork (such as templates) that allows the students to achieve

the requirement.

Paperwork for DS should have all documents as students

received as well as DS SOLUTION, when required.

d. Student Code of Conduct

The Students’ Code of Conduct sets a regulatory framework for students’: expected attitude

and behavior while on the course, participation and contribution to the course, language skills,

academic misconduct and students appeals.

The Student Code of Conduct is enclosed in SOP 300 - Annex C. It will be available to all

students in electronic version on T:\DOCUMENTS FOR STUDENTS and reinforced through

CD’s Course introductory briefing.

e. Assessment of the Students

Policy and procedures on Assessment of the students are given in SOP 300-Annex D.

f. Course and Instructions Monitoring

The Directing Staff (DS) and lecturers will be formally observed when delivering instructions

at PSOTC IAW Bi-SCD 075-007 (Chapter 8 and its Annex S). The monitoring of instructional

performance of DS/lecturers will be conducted to assess: consistency of content of the lecture

with CCD III; delivery techniques and effectiveness of course design - in order to ensure

continuous improvement of instructional effectiveness and strategy – the focus is to improve

instructions. The monitoring of instructions will be done in accordance with a Course

Monitoring Plan, which will be drafted by respective HETS and approved by HETD. The

monitoring will be executed by HETS (SPR), HETD or the Commandant. Observations during

monitoring will be recorded and debriefed to a DS/lecturer as per template in SOP 300 –

Annex G, which will be stored in HETD files.

In addition, on case by case basis and during a particular pilot courses, PSOTC will engage

external evaluation personnel/SMEs from community of interests to conduct Course

monitoring in order to assess alignment of the course with CCDs – the focus is to make

overall improvement of the course design. Course Monitoring also provides an opportunity to

verify that instructors have the prerequisite qualifications and training is satisfied. The Course

monitoring will be planned in Course Monitoring Plan, mentioned above, and executed by an

external evaluator in coordination with HETS and CD. Immediately after the course, the

evaluator will debrief CD and submit Course Monitoring Report (as per template in SOP 300

– Annex H) to HETS, ETPD/QMS and HETD.

Page 41: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

41

5. Course Close Out

The Course Close Out phase starts immediately after finishing of a course and will be finalized

within a two weeks following the end of the course. The Course Close Out is a start of Post Course

Review (PCR) process, which is at the same time part of Evaluation phase of the course. The PCR

process is instructed in SOP 300 – Annex I.

Page 42: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

42

SOP 300 – Annex C

Student Code of Conduct

1. Adherence to Organizational Values. The PSOTC is an excellent PSO training centre which has

earned a strong international reputation and as such strives to provide the highest quality education

and training to both domestic and international security professionals. In order to preserve its

reputation the Centre expects that all personnel, including the students while on courses at PSOTC,

adhere to following organizational values:

a. Professionalism. All personnel at PSOTC will work not just to meet the minimum

standard, but consistently strive to do their very best to achieve and maintain highest quality

standards in the Centre. The personnel at PSOTC will commit themselves to excellence in all

aspects of their professional responsibility, while adhering to principles of professional ethics:

loyalty, selfless service, integrity and professional solidarity.

b. Cultural Awareness. Appreciating the importance of operating in a multicultural and

international context, PSOTC actively demonstrates dedication to engage in collaboration with

partner nations and institutions within and beyond South East Europe. Therefore, personnel at

PSOTC will pay extraordinary attention to cultural awareness within and outside of the

Centre.

c. Innovation. Taking into account that the new ideas are the main drivers behind organizational

development, PSOTC encourages its personnel to bring in new initiatives based on operational

requirements and technological developments that would increase quality of education and

training as well as welfare of the students and staff in the Centre.

d. Constant Improvement. The achievement of highest international standards requires constant

improvement in policies, processes and procedures. PSOTC is dedicated to continuous

revision of education and training processes, professional development of its personnel and

administrative procedures that would lead to costumer oriented constant quality satisfaction

and improvement.

2. Working language. English language is the working langue at PSOTC and it is expected from all

students to use English language on all occasions during the course. In case that a student does

not meet required English language standard (as given in CCD II, Course Invitation Letter), a

Course Director will interview the student together with English Language Teacher in order to

identify remedial actions to be taken, including one-to-one additional English language training

sessions with English Language Teacher, after regular teaching hours.

3. Chain of command. A Syndicate Directing Staff (DS) is the first instance to whom students

should address their requests. In case, that a course is not structured in way to have a Syndicate

DS, than her/his role has Course Director.

4. Student Assessment. PSOTC conducts two types of assessments: formative and summative. In

any case, a Course Director will timely brief the students prior an assessment on concept, rules,

regulations and criteria of a particular assessment, described below:

a. Formative assessment. The goal of formative assessment is to gather feedback that can be

used by the instructor and the students to guide improvements in the ongoing teaching and

learning context. The formative assessment will be done during teaching process through:

quizzes, syndicate discussions, exercise tutorials etc. Formative assessment is not graded,

and the students will receive verbal feedback ether as group or individual from Syndicate

DS, Course Director or a lecturer.

b. Summative assessment. The goal of summative assessment is to measure the level of success

or proficiency that has been obtained at the end of an instructional unit (module, exercise,

Page 43: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

43

part or at the end of a course) through theoretical or practical exam (Formally Assessed

Activity – FAA), by comparing it against standards, criteria or benchmark. The summative

assessment is graded as per standards which will be provided by a Course Director prior

particular exam. The results of summative assessment will be recorded in written, presented

to a student and noted in Student Report in all courses where summative assessment is

conducted. Grading Matrix for FAAs is enclosed in SOP 300 – Annex D, Appendix 1. On

FAAs during courses accredited as per Bologna process, University of Sarajevo Grading

Matrix will apply.

5. Attendance and achievements on the course. The students are expected to take a part in all course

activities and to do their outmost to make a progress and successfully finish the course. At the

end of a course, PSOTC will award one of two types of certificates:

a. Certificate of Completion will be awarded to the students who meet all assessment standards

and who attend all activities at the course. On courses that have summative assessment,

PSOTC will issue written Student Report (in three copies: 1xcopy for PSOTC, 1xcopy for a

student – to be delivered through sending authority and 1xcopy of the Report to the sending

authority itself). Grading of the overall achievement of the student on such courses will be

done in accordance with Course Overall Achievement Grading Matrix given in Student

Report (SOP 300 – Annex D, Appendix 2).

b. Certificate of Attendance will be awarded to a student that fails to attend more than 5% of

classes (cumulatively) during the course; whose overall average result of all FAAs is less

than 40% (on courses that conduct summative assessment) and those whose altitude towards

the course is hostile and resulted in remedial disciplinary action. In case that a course has

one summative test and a student fails to pass threshold of 40%, the student will be given

opportunity to take a re-test.

6. Plagiarism/Academic Misconduct and Cheating. Plagiarism is defined as “The act of claiming to

be the author of material that someone else actually wrote” (Encyclopedia Britannica Online).

Plagiarism can be committed in a variety of forms such as:

Verbatim copying of material from other sources, without proper acknowledgment and

attribution to those sources;

Presentation of material in a paraphrased form without proper acknowledgment of the

original source of ideas;

Presentation of concepts, theories and models of other authors as own;

Wrong attribution to the sources by making misleading references. Proper attribution and

acknowledgment are achieved by using quotation marks, references and lists of

bibliography. Instructions on this are provided to the students at the beginning of the

courses and are contained in the course materials.

a. Plagiarism can be of varying degrees, ranging from fully plagiarized work at one end of the

spectrum to a few single non-attributed sentences at another. Plagiarism can be deliberate or

accidental, resulting from careless writing or formatting mistakes. PSOTC does not excuse

accidental plagiarism. It is an imperative that an author of a written paper ensures consistent

and accurate referencing of the used material.

b. Cheating during exams is completely unacceptable and needs to be dealt with rapidly,

consistently and with great care and diligence. Once there appears to be sufficient evidence

to warrant further action, the Commandant is to be informed, and a Viva is to be convened

on order.

c. Viva. A Viva in this instance is an oral examination of a student, with minimal notice. The

aim of the Viva is not to convict, but to examine whether the student’s knowledge is

consistent with what he has presented on a written paper, exam or presentation.

Page 44: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

44

d. After the Viva, a written report will be submitted to Head of Education and Training

Department for the final decision what further action should be taken. If proved that a

student has breached Policy on Plagiarism/Academic Misconduct and Cheating, it may result

in a student release from the course. The sending authority will be subsequently informed.

7. Student’s Appeal. PSOTC has established mechanism that would allow students to submit their

request for revision of a decision made within the chain of command, to the next higher authority

within the Centre with regard to review of decisions related to academic achievements and to

decisions related to disciplinary issues, as described below:

a. The first level of academic appeal is with the Course Director with whom a student should

request review of DS decision. If a student remains unsatisfied with the decision of a Course

Director, the second level of academic appeal is that a student submit written request to

Head of Training Section, responsible for the course, through her/his DS. The Head of

Training Section will review all necessary documents and previous decisions by Course

Director and DS, make an interview with the student and provide written decision. If the

student is still not satisfied with the result of the reassessment, she/he may make a formal

application in writing to the Head of Education of Training Department within 7 days for

final determination and decision on the case.

b. For a student appeals related to disciplinary issues, participation and attendance, language

skills and a decision prior made by a Viva, the first step is to request a Decision Revision

Cuncil (DRC) through the Course Director to be convened within 24 hours of receiving a

decision that they wish to dispute. The DRC will be composed of three members not directly

associated with the execution of the Course and they will be appoinited by the Commandant.

After the case is presented by a student and teaching staff, the DRC will make

recomandtions to the Comamndnat for the final decision.

8. Financial liability and responsibility. The students will be held responsible and financially liable

for any damaged made in accommodation, teaching and sport facilities, teaching and supporting

equipment and any other property of PSOTC. The sending authority will be informed

subsequently.

9. Duty student. The students will perform as a Duty Student during the course, as per SOP regulating

this field. The Duty Student is responsible to the Course Director.

10. The students will select a Course Senior Student, who will be representing the class during PSOTC

Cooperation Committee (COOPC). The role of the COOPC is to ensure that the Commandant is

provided with the best possible advises and information for decision making that will improve

overall management and quality in the Centre.

Page 45: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

45

SOP 300 – Annex D

Assessment of Students

1. In accordance with Bi-SCD 075-007 (Chapter 6-8) and PSOTC’s Education and Training

Management goals which are focused on delivering the highest quality and internationally

recognized education and training at the Centre, PSOTC plans, organizes and conduct

Assessment of Students as a part of the application of NATO SAT in ET process in the Centre.

This Annex outlines policy and procedures on Assessment of Students during courses delivered

by PSOTC.

2. The Centre conducts Assessment of the Students by using formative and summative type of

assessments, depending on the Course Assessment Plan. In any case, a Course Director will

timely brief the students prior an assessment on the concept, rules, regulations and criteria of a

particular assessment during the course.

a. Formative assessment.

1) The goal of formative assessment is to gather feedback that can be used by the DSs and

the students to guide improvements in the ongoing teaching and learning process. The

formative assessment will be done during teaching process through: quizzes, syndicate

discussions, exercise tutorials etc.

2) Formative assessment is not graded, and the students will receive qualitative verbal

feedback ether as group or individual from Syndicate DS, Course Director or a lecturer.

3) Since English language is the working langue at PSOTC, special attention will be paid to

the students struggling to meet required English language standard that would enable

them to participate in the course effectively. In case that a student does not meet required

English language standard (as given in CCD II, Course Invitation Letter), a Course

Director will interview the student together with English Language Teacher in order to

identify remedial actions to be taken, including one-to-one additional English language

training sessions with English Language Teacher, after regular teaching hours.

b. Summative assessment.

1) The goal of summative assessment is to measure the level of success or proficiency that

has been obtained at the end of an instructional unit (module, exercise, part or at the end

of a course) through theoretical or practical exam (Formally Assessed Activity – FAA),

by comparing it against standards, criteria or benchmark. Without intention to impose

solution within a Course Assessment Plan, following guidelines should be taken into

account in terms of what type of courses should use summative assessment: staff NCO

and officers’ courses whose graduates are indented to work at multinational HQs (i.e.

PSO Staff NCOs’ Course, International Staff Officers’ Skills Course, International

Military Peace Operations Staff Officers’ Course, UN Staff Officers Course etc.); UN

accredited courses (i.e. UN Police Course); courses accredited as per Bologna Process

(i.e. Media Management in PSO Course, Euro Atlantic Security Course).

2) Since the summative assessment is graded, a CD will pay special attention to design of

Course Assessment Plan, development, preparation and timely communication to the

students of rules, regulations and standards prior a particular exam.

3) The results of summative assessment will be recorded in written, presented to a student

and noted in Student Report in all courses where summative assessment is conducted.

Grading Matrix for FAAs is enclosed in SOP 300-Annex D (Appendix 1).

4) On FAAs during courses accredited as per Bologna process, University of Sarajevo

Grading Matrix will be applied and presented to the students transparently prior an exam

on these kind of courses.

Page 46: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

46

3. For overall assessment on the courses where summative assessments are applied, a CD will use

Course Overall Achievement Grading Matrix, which is integral part of Student Report (template

in SOP 300-Annex D, Appendix 2), which will be issued along with a course certificate.

4. Attendance and achievements on the course. The students are expected to take a part in all course

activities and to do their outmost to make a progress and successfully finish the course. At the

end of a course, PSOTC will award two types of certificates:

a. Certificate of Completion will be awarded to the students who meet all assessment standards

and who attend all activities at the course. On courses that have summative assessment,

PSOTC will issue written Student Report (in three copies: 1xcopy for PSOTC, 1xcopy for a

student – to be delivered through sending authority and 1xcopy of the Report to the sending

authority itself).

b. Certificate of Attendance will be awarded to a student that fails to attend more than 5% of

classes (cumulatively) during the course; whose overall average result of all FAAs is less

than 40% (on courses that conduct summative assessment) and those whose altitude towards

the course is hostile and resulted in remedial disciplinary action. In case that a course has

one summative test and a student fails to pass threshold of 40%, the student will be given

opportunity to take a re-test.

5. Plagiarism/Academic Misconduct and Cheating. Plagiarism is defined as “The act of claiming to

be the author of material that someone else actually wrote” (Encyclopedia Britannica Online).

Plagiarism can be committed in a variety of forms such as:

Verbatim copying of material from other sources, without proper acknowledgment and

attribution to those sources;

Presentation of material in a paraphrased form without proper acknowledgment of the

original source of ideas;

Presentation of concepts, theories and models of other authors as own;

Wrong attribution to the sources by making misleading references. Proper attribution and

acknowledgment are achieved by using quotation marks, references and lists of

bibliography. Instructions on this are provided to the students at the beginning of the

courses and are contained in the course materials.

a. Plagiarism can be of varying degrees, ranging from fully plagiarized work at one end of the

spectrum to a few single non-attributed sentences at another. Plagiarism can be deliberate or

accidental, resulting from careless writing or formatting mistakes. PSOTC does not excuse

accidental plagiarism. It is an imperative that an author of a written paper ensures consistent

and accurate referencing of the used material.

b. Cheating during exams is completely unacceptable and needs to be dealt with rapidly,

consistently and with great care and diligence. Once there appears to be sufficient evidence

to warrant further action, the Commandant is to be informed, and a Viva is to be convened

on order.

c. Viva. A Viva in this instance is an oral examination of a student, with minimal notice. The

aim of the Viva is not to convict, but to examine whether the student’s knowledge is

consistent with what he has presented on a written paper, exam or presentation.

d. After the Viva, a written report will be submitted to Head of Education and Training

Department for the final decision what further action should be taken. If proved that a

student has breached Policy on Plagiarism/Academic Misconduct and Cheating, it may result

in a student release from the course. The sending authority will be subsequently informed.

Page 47: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

47

6. Student’s Appeal. PSOTC has established mechanism that would allow students to submit their

request for revision of a decision made within the chain of command, to the next higher authority

within the Centre with regard to review of decisions related to academic achievements and to

decisions related to disciplinary issues, as described below:

a. The first level of academic appeal is with the Course Director with whom a student should

request review of DS decision. If a student remains unsatisfied with the decision of a Course

Director, the second level of academic appeal is that a student submit written request to

Head of Training Section, responsible for the course, through her/his DS. The Head of

Training Section will review all necessary documents and previous decisions by Course

Director and DS, make an interview with the student and provide written decision. If the

student is still not satisfied with the result of the reassessment, she/he may make a formal

application in writing to the Head of Education of Training Department within 7 days for

final determination and decision on the case.

b. For a student appeals related to disciplinary issues, participation and attendance, language

skills and a decision made prior by a Viva, the first step is to request a Decision Revision

Council (DRC) through the Course Director to be convened within 24 hours of receiving a

decision that they wish to dispute. The DRC will be composed of three members not directly

associated with the direct execution of the Course and they will be appoinited by the

Commandant. After the case is presented by a student and teaching staff, the DRC be will

make recomandtions to the Comamndnat for the final decision.

Page 48: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

48

Appendix 1

SOP 300 – Annex D

Formally Assessed Activities Grading Matrix

Description

GRADE (X)

of Correct Performace (%) DESCRIPTION

EXCELLENT

(A)

86 - 100 %

Work of such a high standard has to be acceptable without

change; work not subject to improvement or only subject to

minor improvement as a matter of personal and subjective

preference.

An excellent performance, in accordance with conditions and

given standards; making mistakes or incorrect answers 14% or

less.

VERY GOOD

(B) 70 - 85 %

Work which generally meets the objectives of the exercise or

exam, but in which a few alterations to both substance and

detail must be made. (An excellent first draft. A commander

or senior staff officer would wish to make a few alterations

before signing it); making mistakes or incorrect answers 30%

or less.

GOOD

(C)

56 - 69%

Work which meets the major objectives of the exercise or

exam, but in which alterations to both substance and detail

must be made. The distinction between average and below

average is the number and degree of the alternations required.

A commander or senior staff officer would wish to make

major alternations before signing it; making mistakes or

incorrect answers 44% or less.

BELOW AVERAGE

(D) 41 – 55 %

Work of below average quality in which one or more of the

major exercise objectives have not been met, and considerable

change in constructions; substance and/or detail is required.

Repeated submission of work of this quality would reflect

badly on the officer’s career. A commander is likely to reject

this work and ask the author to resubmit; making mistakes or

incorrect answers 59% or less.

FAIL

(E)

1 – 40 %

The officer concerned has failed to understand the

requirement or for some reason submitted an incomplete or

hugely inaccurate staff work or exam. Work of this nature

would be wholly unacceptable in a HQ; making mistakes or

incorrect answers 60% or more.

Page 49: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

49

Appendix 2

SOP 300-Annex D

STUDENT REPORT

(Template)

XX Course

Conducted at Peace Support Operations Training Centre,

Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina in the period from XX to XX

1. Course participant:

2. Course Background: e. Aim of the Course. The aim of the Course is...

f. Modules/Subjects (Number of 45 min. classes): Military Decision Making Process (30); International

Humanitarian Law (8) etc.

3. Results on Formally Assessed Activities (FAA) FAA - Module Course

Marks / %

Achieved

Marks / %

Description of FAA

FAA1 – UN PSO Doctrine

and Tactics 10 / 20

8 / 16

Theoretical exam in order to confirm ELO ( 1.1-

1.4.) - Understand UN PSO Doctrine and Tactics.

FAA2 – UN Military

Decision Making Process 20 / 40 15 / 30

Practical exam through CPX in order to

confirm ELO (3.1.-3-5) - Apply UN MDMP

processes and procedures.

FAA 3 – End of Course

Exam 20 / 40 15 / 30

Theoretical exam in order to confirm ELO (4.1.-

4.3.) – Comprehend Leadership and Ethics and

ELO (5.1.-5.3.) – Understand utility of gender on

PSO .

TOTAL SCORE 50 / 100 38 / 76

4. Course Overall Achievement Grading Matrix Description

Syndicate Directing Staff Course Director Course Participant

Rank, name and surname Rank, name and surname Rank, name and surname

_____________________ __________________ __________________ (Signature) (Signature) (Signature)

COMMANDANT

Rank, name and suranme

____________________ (Signature)

Sarajevo, Date

Rank Name and surname Affiliation (organization/nation)

Course Grade / %

Course Ranking (achieved/students

OF-3 XY Armed Forces/

Mongolia

B / 76 3/24

GRADE Percentage of

Correct

Performance

Description

A 86 – 100 EXCELLENT / Suited for standalone multinational (MN) deployment

B 70 – 85 VERY GOOD / Suited for MN deployment with no supervision

C 56 – 69 GOOD / Suited for MN deployment with minimum supervision

D 41 – 55 SATISFACTORY / Suited for deployment with more than average supervision

E 1 – 40 LESS THAN SATISFACTORY / Suited for deployment with considerable

supervision

Page 50: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

50

SOP 300 – Annex E

Student Feedback Form

(Template; done in Excel Sheet)

Student Feedback Form

XX Course (from xx to xx) - filled in by CD

Part A. Detailed Assessment

NOTE: Please read guidelines below Dear fellow, 1. The feedback given by our students and staff during courses is highly appreciated by PSOTC and severs only to improve quality of our courses and services provided during your stay at the Centre. 2. This is Part 1 of unanimous feedback which serves to make detailed assessment of teaching delivered on the Course. The Part 2, which is on Sheet No2 of the Feedback, summarises your views on value and achievements as well as assessment of administrative and logistical support during the Course. 3. Please fill in the Feedback Form at the end of each day by highlighting corresponding field with the number in yellow (or circle, if the Form is printed) and save it as “SFF – x” (number as agreed in your syndicate, which will not be known to your DS) on your dedicated Syndicate drive. 4. Please, report to your DS when completed the whole Feedback, but not later than the end of teaching on last Thursday of the Course. Thank you for your cooperation and valuable feedback!

Week 1 - Day 1

LECTURE : XX (filled in by CD)

Not at all

very

relevance 1 2 3 4 5

boring

lively

delivery 1 2 3 4 5

too short

too long

length 1 2 3 4 5

too much

too little

amount of info 1 2 3 4 5

Week 1 - Day 2

TUTORIAL: XX (filled in by CD)

not at all

very

relevance 1 2 3 4 5

easy

difficult

difficulty 1 2 3 4 5

too short

too long

allocated time 1 2 3 4 5

too much

too little

supporting material 1 2 3 4 5

ADDITIONAL REMARKS

Student Feedback Form XX Course (from xx to xx) - filled in by CD

Page 51: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

51

Part B. General Assessment

1. Assessment of learning / teaching a. How well were learning objectives met by the lectures, tutorials and

exercises:

Not at all

Completely

1 2 3 4 5

b. Can you estimate the value of this course to your current job or future appointment

No value

Great vaule

1 2 3 4 5

b. How would you rate the amount of time allocated for this course

Too short

Too long

1 2 3 4 5

c. How difficult or challenging was the material in this course

Too easy

Very difficult

1 2 3 4 5

d. How would you rate overall structure and flow of the course

Poor

Excellent

1 2 3 4 5

2. Assessment of the support a. Reception and In processing

Dissatisfied

Completely Satisfied

1 2 3 4 5

b. Student’s administration

Dissatisfied

Completely Satisfied

1 2 3 4 5

a. Allocated accommodation

Dissatisfied

Completely Satisfied

1 2 3 4 5

d.Quality of food in DIFAC

Dissatisfied

Completely Satisfied

1 2 3 4 5

e. Vending machines offer

Dissatisfied

Completely Satisfied

1 2 3 4 5

f.Sarajevo Orientation Tour

Dissatisfied

Completely Satisfied

1 2 3 4 5

g.Course Official Dinner

Dissatisfied

Completely Satisfied

1 2 3 4 5

ADDITIONAL REMARKS

SOP 300 – Annex F

Page 52: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

52

XX COURSE

from X to X

Staff Lessons Identified Sheet

(Template)

S/N Subject Observation Recommendation /

Clarification

Observed

by

Remarks

Page 53: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

53

SOP 300 – Annex G

Instructions Monitoring Report

The Directing Staff (DS) and lecturers will be formally observed when delivering instructions at

PSOTC IAW Bi-SCD 075-007 (Chapter 8 and its Annex S). The monitoring of instructional

performance of DS/lecturers will be conducted to assess: consistency of content of the lecture with

CCD III; delivery techniques and effectiveness of course design - in order to ensure continuous

improvement of instructional effectiveness and strategy. The monitoring of instructions will be done

in accordance with a Course Monitoring Plan, which will be drafted by respective HETS and approved

by HETD. The monitoring will be executed by HETS (SPR), HETD or the Commandant.

Observations during monitoring will be recorded and debriefed to a DS/lecturer IAW this Annex,

which will be stored in HETD files.

A.General

Monitor Name: Start Time:

Date of observation: End Time:

Course: DS/Lecturer:

Lesson Title:

B.Rating Rating Measures Action required by the Instructor

4 – Demonstrate mastery in all aspects None – consider mentoring colleagues

3 – Demonstrate competency, with minor gaps Consider seeking ways to continually improve.

2- Demonstrate some competency, but needs

improvement.

Focus on improving per recommendations.

1 – Failed to demonstrate majority of competencies Seek assistance and make improvements per

recommendations before next teching

C.DS / Lecturer Competences D.Marking

Supporting Documentation 1 2 3 4 Comments

Lesson Plan for the period of instructions was

available.

Written guidance to students for syndicate work

was provided.

The lessons title is clearly identified in Course

Critique.

The Lesson is clearly identified in the Course

Schedule.

Lessons Alignment 1 2 3 4 Comments

The aim of the Lesson is clearly stated.

The teaching points presented align with the LO

stated in the CCD III.

The references for the lesson are stated and are

consistent with the CCD III.

The timing for the lesson is consistent with the

CCD III and the Course Schedule.

The syndicate work was aligned with the objectives

outlined in the CCD III.

The instructional strategy used was aligned with the

instructional strategy listed in the CCD III.

The DOK was consistent with the level identified in

the CCD III.

The assessment strategy is consistent with the CCD

III.

Instructional Effectiveness 1 2 3 4 Comments

The training facility was adequately prepared to

deliver instruction.

Supporting materials were readily available.

Page 54: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

54

The facilitator gained and maintained the attention

of the class.

The facilitator established the relevance of what

was being presented to the students.

The teaching points were presented in a logical

sequence.

The facilitator provided relative verbal support

(examples / explanations / statistics).

The visual aids used were clear and supported the

teaching points.

Media used during the lesson were of appropriate

number, duration and quality.

The facilitator engaged the students during the

lesson using effective questioning techniques.

The facilitator emphasized important points /

issues.

The facilitator periodically checked for student

understanding.

The facilitator provided a summary of the main

teaching points at the end of the lesson.

The training facility was adequately prepared to

deliver instruction.

Student Assessment 1 2 3 4 Comments

Assessment details / test Instructions provided to

the student.

The assessment is at the proper DOK for the course.

An answer key or assessment checklist for

syndicate presentations is available.

The assessment is aligned with the course lesson

objectives and CCD III.

The DOK being assessed is consistent with the

LO(s) in the CCD III.

The content assessed aligns with the content

presented during the course.

Students are provided with the results of the

assessment as well as facilitator feedback.

Assessment details / test Instructions provided to

the student.

Other Comments, recommendations and Best Practice Observations

Monitor: DS/Lecturer:

(siginutre) (siginutre)

Page 55: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

55

SOP 300 - Annex H

Course Monitoring Report

(sample)

Date:

To:

- Head of Education and Training Department

- ETPD/QMS

- CD

Subject: XX Course Monitoring Report

1. Background of deployment:

2. Monitoring details:

Title of course:

Duration of monitoring:

Monitor rank, surname, name, nationality:

Course Director:

3. Methodology of monitoring:

Direct observation of classes/exercises;

Interview with course director, teaching staff and students;

Analysing course documents;

Compare delivery to CCDs.

4. Key Recommendations:

Annexes:

A. Course Monitoring Check list

B. Best and Weakest Practice Observations and Detailed Recommendations

Submitted by Monitor: Acknowledged by Course Director

Rank, name and surname, nationality Rank, name and surname, nationality

_____________________________ _______________________________

Signature Signature

Page 56: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

56

Annex A

Course Monitoring Report

Course Monitoring Check List

(template)

On case by case basis and in particular for pilot courses, PSOTC invites external evaluation

personnel/SMEs from community of interests to conduct Course monitoring in order to assess

alignment of the course with CCDs – the focus is to make overall improvement of the course design.

Course Monitoring also provides an opportunity to verify that instructors have the prerequisite

qualifications and training is satisfied. The Course monitoring will be also planned in Course

Monitoring Plan, mentioned above, and executed by an external evaluator in coordination with HETS

and CD. Immediately after the course, the evaluator will debrief CD and submit Course Monitoring

Report to ETPD/QMS, HETS and HETD. The Report will be stored with ETPD/QMS.

Supporting Documentation Yes Some No Comments

Lesson Plan for the period of

instructions was available.

Written guidance to students for

syndicate work was provided.

The lessons title is clearly identified in

Course Critique.

The Lesson is clearly identified in the

Course Schedule.

Lessons Alignment Yes Some No Comments

The aim of the Lesson is clearly stated.

The teaching points presented align

with the LO stated in the CCD III.

The references for the lesson are stated

and are consistent with the CCD III.

The timing for the lesson is consistent

with the CCD III and the Course

Schedule.

The syndicate work was aligned with

the objectives outlined in the CCD III.

The instructional strategy used was

aligned with the instructional strategy

listed in the CCD III.

The DOK was consistent with the level

identified in the CCD III.

The assessment strategy is consistent

with the CCD III.

Instructional Effectiveness Yes Some No Comments

The training facility was adequately

prepared to deliver instruction.

Supporting materials were readily

available.

The facilitator gained and maintained

the attention of the class.

The facilitator established the

relevance of what was being presented

to the students.

The teaching points were presented in a

logical sequence.

The facilitator provided relative verbal

support (examples / explanations /

statistics).

The visual aids used were clear and

supported the teaching points.

Media used during the lesson were of

Page 57: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

57

appropriate number, duration and

quality.

The facilitator engaged the students

during the lesson using effective

questioning techniques.

The facilitator emphasized important

points / issues.

The facilitator periodically checked for

student understanding.

The facilitator provided a summary of

the main teaching points at the end of

the lesson.

The training facility was adequately

prepared to deliver instruction.

Student Assessment Yes Some No Comments

Assessment details / test Instructions

provided to the student.

The assessment is at the proper DOK

for the course.

An answer key or assessment checklist

for syndicate presentations is available.

The assessment is aligned with the

course lesson objectives and CCD III.

The DOK being assessed is consistent

with the LO(s) in the CCD III.

The content assessed aligns with the

content presented during the course.

Students are provided with the results

of the assessment as well as facilitator

feedback.

Assessment details / test Instructions

provided to the student.

Other Comments

Page 58: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

58

Annex B

Course Monitoring Report

Best and Weakest Practice Observations and Detailed Recommendations

A. Best and Weakest Practice Observations

a. Weakest points of the course

b. Best practice of the course

c. Course documentation

d. Preparation of the course

e. Execution of the course

f. Close out of the course

B. Detailed Recommendations

Page 59: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

59

SOP 300 - Annex I

Instructions on Course Close out – First Stage of Post Course Review

Introduction

The SOP 300 – Annex I lays down procedures for the Course Close out after the end of the course.

This phase starts immediately after finishing of the course and will be finalized within two weeks

following the end of the course. The Course Close Out is the first stage of the Post Course Review

(PCR) process, which will be extended with its second stage during next SAT phase - Evaluation and

Education of Training, that is instructed below. The Course Close Out – The First Stage of PCR is

focused on the course that has been delivered and aims at capturing the first impressions on the

conduct of the course, students’ and instructors’ reactions on the course and support issues that may

have impact on the next iteration of the course.

During the first post-course week, the CD will collect and analyse results of Students’ assessment,

Students’ Feedback, Staff Lessons Identified; consult HETS if there are relevant inputs from

Instructions and Course Monitoring Report (if applicable); and conduct Post Course Review Meeting

(PCRM). Based on inputs received through above mentioned evaluation and conclusions from the

Meeting itself, the CD will draft and present Course After Action Report (CAAR) by the end of the

second week after the Course. The CAAR is the key input to the next stage of the PCR. During this

period, a CD will also draft and send External Lecture’s Letter of Appreciation, as applicable.

1. Students’ Feedback Form. The CD will prepare e-version of the Student’ Feedback Form during

the Preparation phase of the course. The feedback from the students is a valuable tool to collect

students’ reactions on the course, which will be taken into account during the review and

improvement of the Course. The Student Feedback Forms are unanimous and they will be

available to the students on Syndicate drives. The Forms will be filled at the end of teaching day

after each day. At the end of the Course, the CD will analyze and store all forms in course folder

on T-drive.

2. Staff Lessons Identified Sheet. The purpose of the Staff Lessons Identified Sheet is to collect

impressions and feedback from both teaching and supporting staff during the course in order to

make improvements in the course for the future iterations. The Sheet will be prepared by the CD

during the Preparation phase of the course, stored in course folder on T-drive and its link will be

shared with all staff NLT D-7. The CD will present inputs provided in the Sheet during

preparations of PCRM and take them into consideration when preparing the CAAR.

3. Instructions Monitoring Report. The Directing Staff (DS) and lecturers will be formally observed

when delivering instructions at PSOTC IAW Bi-SCD 075-007 (Chapter 8 and its Annex S). The

monitoring of instructional performance of DS/lecturers will be conducted in accordance with

Course Monitoring Plan, which will be drafted by respective HETS and approved by HETD. The

monitoring will be executed by HETS (SPR), HETD or the Commandant. Observations during

monitoring will be recorded and debriefed to a DS/lecturer IAW SOP Annex - G, which will be

stored in HETD’s files. During the PCR process, the CD will consult respective HETS and seek if

there are relevant inputs for the CAAR.

4. Course Monitoring Report. Besides monitoring of instructions, on case by case basis and during a

particular pilot course, PSOTC will engage external evaluation personnel/SMEs from community

of interest to conduct Course monitoring in order to assess alignment of the course with CCDs –

the focus is to make overall improvement of the course design. The Course Monitoring also

provides an opportunity to verify that instructors have the prerequisite qualifications and training

is satisfied. The Course monitoring will be planned in accordance with Course Monitoring Plan,

mentioned above, and executed by an external evaluator in coordination with HETS and CD.

Immediately after the course, the evaluator will debrief CD and submit Course Monitoring Report

to HETS, ETPD/QMS and HETD, which will be taken into account when conducting the PCRM

and preparing the CAAR.

Page 60: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

60

5. Post Course Review Meeting (PCRM). The PCRM aims at capturing students’, instructors and

external stakeholders’ impressions and relations on the course. The Meeting is called and chaired

by the CD. The participants of the meeting are: Course DSs, HETS, representatives from the Staff

(S1-S8), representative from ETPD/QMS, external stakeholders’ representative and any other

member of PSOTC as deemed necessary by the CD. The PCRM should be structured based on

the agenda that will include (lead):

a. Student demographic (number and profile of students expected vs. profile and number of

students attended the course, including country of origin) – (S1).

b. External lectures and role players demographic (required vs. provided number/profile of

lecturers and affiliation) – (CD).

c. Review of Student Feedback (each item followed by discussion and recommendations for

improvement) – (CD):

i. Reaction / Grade of each individual lecture.

ii. General Assessment of the value of the course, based on questions in the summary of

the Student Feedback Form:

iii. Reaction on support of the course.

d. Results and review of student assessment – (CD)

e. Staff Lessons Identified Sheet review – (CD)

f. External stakeholders’ observations – (eternal stakeholder and ETPD/QMS)

g. Financial considerations – (BUDFIN):

i. Overall estimated cost of the course (major items to be included: travel,

accommodation, meals and refreshments, social events and course material)

ii. Estimated cost covered by BiH

iii. Estimated cost covered by the third party (number of students reimbursed by the third

party -NATO MPD, partner nation/organization, other items covered by the third

party).

iv. Course fee collected

v. Any financial issue remaining opened.

h. Issues raised in Course Monitoring Report (if applicable) – (ETPD/QMS)

i. Recommendations for improvement of the course - (CD)

The PCRM will be documented and submitted to HETD and Chief of Staff in a form of the

Meeting Minutes (Template at SOP 300 – Annex I, Appendix 1), which will also serve as basis

for Course After Action Report.

7. Course After Action Report. The Course After Action Report (CAAR, template SOP 300 –

Annex I, Appendix 2) is prepared by the CD by the end of the second week after the course is

finished. The CAAR summarizes findings, conclusions and recommendations identified during

the PCRM. The CAAR is submitted to HETD, info to Chief of Staff and heads of sections and

stored as per SOP 300 – Annex N. National obligations for reporting on activities at PSOTC to

TRADOC will be conducted as per current national regulations.

8. Appendixes:

1. Template - Meeting Minutes Form

2. Template - Course After Action Report

Page 61: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

61

Appendix 1

SOP 300 – Annex I

Meeting Minutes Form

General

Date / Time

Place

Agenda

Participants

Not in Attendance

Minutes

# Item Decision / Remarks

1.

Date:

Date:

Date

Secretary:

(function, rank,

name and suranme)

Submitted to:

(function, rank,

name and suranme)

Approved:

(function, rank,

name and suranme)

`

Template for Meeting Minutes

Minutes of XX Meeting No. X/Year

Page 62: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

62

Appedix 2

SOP Annex 300 – Annex I

Peace Support Operations Traning Centre

Education and Traning Department

Date:

To:

- Head of Education and Training Department

Info:

- Chief of Staff

- CSM

- Head of Sections

Subject: XX Course After Action Report

Reference:

1. Introduction

a. Dates of the course:

b. DS team:

c. Partner agency (if any):

2. Summary on Course participants

a. Demography

b. Highlights of Student Feedback:

1) Student reaction on the courses: 1.e.(1). How well were learning objectives met by the lectures, tutorials and exercises:

Total

#

Note Not at all

Completely

1 2 3 4 5

XXX

XX XX XX XX XX

1.e.(2). Can you estimate the value of this course to your current job or future appointment

Total

#

Note No value

Great vaule

1 2 3 4 5

XXX

XX XX XX XX XX

1.e.(3) How would you rate the amount of time allocated for this course

Total

#

Note Too short Too long

1 2 3 4 5

XXX

XX XX XX XX XX

1.e.(4). How difficult or challenging was the material in this course

Total

#

Note

Too easy

Very

difficult

1 2 3 4 5

XXX

XX XX XX XX XX

1.e.(5). How would you rate overall structure and flow of the course

Total

#

Note

Poor

Excellent

1 2 3 4 5

XXX

XX XX XX XX XX

Page 63: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

63

c. Major points to be improved in the course in terms of course design, teaching

and students’ satisfaction with the support:

d. Summary of the results of students assessment

3. Major observations by the staff and external stakeholders on the course

4. Financial considerations:

a. Overall estimated cost of the course

b. Estimated cost covered by BiH

c. Estimated cost covered by the third party

d. Course fee collected

e. Any financial issue remaining opened

5. Recommendations for improvement of the course (with suggested timeline and

responsibilities)

Annexes:

C. Course Schedule

D. List of participants of the course

E. Financial estimate (overall, gain through reimbursement of the third party,

course fee by non-sponsored students)

Course Director

Rank, name and surname, nationality

______________________________

Signature

Page 64: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

64

SOP 300 – Annex J

Instructions on Quality Management Committee

1. General. Quality Management Committee (QMC) has primary responsibility to monitor

implementation of quality management policy and strategy in PSOTC and provides advice related

to quality management and quality assurance to the AMB and the CO of PSOTC. The QMC is

held twice a year – by mid July, covering first half of the year and by mid Dec, covering the

second half of the year (and which will approve Annual QA Report).

2. Participation. The QMC is chaired by the Head of Education and Training Department (HETD),

who is responsible for Quality Management in PSOTC to the Commandant. The meetings of

QMC will be attended by: CSM, PR, HETSs, MTT leader and a representative from the Staff.

The ETPD/QMS is responsible to prepare the QMC meetings and provide secretary for the

Meeting.

3. Authority. The QMC is authorized and responsible for:

b. Review Quality Assurance Policy and related SOPs for their consistency, relevance and the

need to be improved.

c. Review organizational performance effectiveness based on key performance indicators.

d. Provide recommendations for improvements of quality management to the AMB and the

CO.

e. The second annual session of the QMC will approve PSOTC Annual QA Report.

4. Organizational performance effectiveness will be reviewed based on following performance

indicators:

S/N Performance indicator Value

1. Residential courses

1.a. # Planned / Executed courses

1.b. # Student attended the courses (overall/Int./national)

1.c. # Countries participated

1.d. # ADL modules in spt of the courses

1.e. Student reaction on the courses: 1.e.(1). How well were learning objectives met by the lectures, tutorials and exercises:

Total

#

Note Not at all

Completely

1 2 3 4 5

XXX

XX XX XX XX XX

1.e.(2). Can you estimate the value of this course to your current job or future appointment

Total

#

Note No value

Great vaule

1 2 3 4 5

XXX

XX XX XX XX XX

1.e.(3) How would you rate the amount of time allocated for this course

Total

#

Note Too short Too long

1 2 3 4 5

XXX

XX XX XX XX XX

1.e.(4). How difficult or challenging was the material in this course

Total

#

Note

Too easy

Very

difficult

1 2 3 4 5

XXX

XX XX XX XX XX

1.e.(5). How would you rate overall structure and flow of the course

Total Note Poor

Excellent

Page 65: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

65

#

1 2 3 4 5

XXX

XX XX XX XX XX

2. MTT delivered courses

2.a. # Planned / Executed courses

2.b. # Student attended the courses (overall/Int./national)

2.c. # Countries participated

2.d. Students reaction on the courses

2.d.(1). How well were learning objectives met by the lectures, tutorials and exercises:

Total

#

Note Not at all

Completely

1 2 3 4 5

XXX

XX XX XX XX XX

2.d.(2). Can you estimate the value of this course to your current job or future appointment

Total

#

Note No value

Great vaule

1 2 3 4 5

XXX

XX XX XX XX XX

2.d.(3) How would you rate the amount of time allocated for this course

Total

#

Note Too short Too long

1 2 3 4 5

XXX

XX XX XX XX XX

2.d.(4). How difficult or challenging was the material in this course

Total

#

Note

Too easy

Very

difficult

1 2 3 4 5

XXX

XX XX XX XX XX

2.d.(5). How would you rate overall structure and flow of the course

Total

#

Note Poor Excellent

1 2 3 4 5

XXX

XX XX XX XX XX

3. Other training activities (Conf., Seminars, WS)

3.a. # Planned / Executed activities

3.b. # Participants (overall/international/national)

4. Overall

4.a. # Planned / Executed Activities

4.b. # Participants

5. Execution of instructors exchange programme

5.a. # Instructors exchange out of PSOTC (int/nat)

5.b. # Instructors exchange to PSOTC (int/nat)

6. Course / Instruction Monitoring

6.a. # DSs/Lecturers monitored

6.b. #Courses monitored

7. Documentation

7.a. CCDs total # courses / #CCDs completed)

7.b. # CAAR submitted / # due

5. Annual Quality Assurance Report. The Annual QA Report will be drafted by ETPD/QMS and

submit to HETD and the CO for approval by the end of the year. The QA Report will be based on

the QMCs findings and prepared IAW Bi-SC 075 – 00. The Report will cover internal and

external elements influencing improvements of QA within the Centre by presenting results and

progress on:

a. Policy and procedures.

b. Staff/DS development.

Page 66: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

66

c. Information systems and knowledge management.

d. Learning resources and student support.

e. Contributions to NATO.

The QA Report will also include QA Improvement Plan, which will identify authorities,

responsibilities, resources and timeline for execution of the Plan.

6. The QMC sessions will be documented in Meeting Minutes (SOP 300 – Annex I, Appendix 1),and

together with Annual QA Report will be stored in accordance with SOP 300 – Annex N.

Page 67: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

67

SOP 300 – Annex K

Instructions on Conduct of the Academic Management Board

1. General. The Academic Management Board (AMB) is the main management body in the Centre

that reviews overall Centers’ performance, acts as the main advisory body to the CO and, based on

which the CO gives guidelines and directions related to development and execution of ET, quality

assurance, personnel, logistics and financial matters.

2. Participants. The AMB is held twice a year – in April and October. The composition of the

PSOTC AMB: CO (Chairperson), CSM, PAA to the CO, COS, HETD, Head of Sections, and other

staff members, as required. The HETD will be responsible to coordinate preparation of the Meeting

and raise any issue related to QA and recommendations coming from the QMC, while Section

Heads will be responsible to present review of their respective section's courses and ETPD/QMS

will present new training requirements/initiatives and provide Secretary for the meeting.

3. Authority. The AMB is authorized to/for:

a. Conduct qualitative, quantitative and financial review of activities conducted at the centre.

b. Approval of courses and resources for upcoming year and submission to higher HQ (April’s

session).

c. Provide Annual Guidelines for courses and resources in upcoming year (November’s

session).

d. Approve conduct of new courses and initiatives to be run at the Centre during CY+1.

e. Approve changes in Quality Assurance Policy and related SOPs.

4. Conduct of the course relevance. The course relevance will be reviewed based on three domains:

quantitative, qualitative and financial. Number of factors will be taken into considerations for

each domain (see Course Relevance Review Matrix below). The analyses of factors will lead to

deduction and overall status of the course, which will be assessed and proposed by HETS as:

a. GREEN (G):

(1) Quantitative factors show that number of the students / course remains at

list at average level (AVG).

(2) Qualitative factors indicate that there interest from external stakeholders,

PSOTC has up to date CCDs, which reflects latest NATO doctrinal

changes.

(3) Financial factors show that there are no major finical constrains.

b. YELLOW (Y):

(1) Maximum overall two factors (combined - quantitative, qualitative and

financial domain) indicate issues that must be resolved prior the next

course.

(2) The course requires slight redesign.

c. RED (R):

(1) Two or more factors in quantitative, qualitative or financial domain

indicate issues that must be resolved prior the next course.

(2) The course requires major redesign.

5. Based on the course review and recommendations presented by the HETS, using the Matrix

below:

Page 68: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

68

Course Relevance Review Matrix

Domain of

Relevance

Factors Value Deduction Overall

Status

AMB

Decision Course Title : XX G/Y/R

1. Quantitative

a. #Courses/year planned/executed X/X

a. AVG#Students planned/attended X/X

c. AVG#Students Int./National X/X

2.Qualitative

a. External requirement exists Y/N

b. Course Aim relevant Y/N

c. CCDs up to date Y/N

d. Latest NATO ops/doctrinal docs

reflected in the course

Y/N

e.Adequate Profile of participants Y/N

f. Supports BiH PfP Goal Y/N

3.Financial

a. Overall Course cost estimate XXX

b. Covered by BiH XXX

c. Covered by third party XXX

the AMB will make decision either to: maintain status quo, , seek more info prior making the

final decision, to proceed with necessary adjustments in the course, to postpone or to cancel the

course. In case of the new training requirement, which will be presented by ETPD/QMS, the

AMB might approve the course or to seek additional info prior the approval.

6. The AMB Meeting will be documented in accordance with Meeting Minutes (SOP 300 – Annex I

, Appendix 1), with Course Relevance Review Matrix enclosed and stored IAW SOP 300 –

Annex N.

Page 69: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

69

SOP 300 – Annex L

Instrutions on PSOTC Cooperation Committee (COOPC)

1. General. The purpose of the COOPC is to ensure that the CO is provided with the best possible

advises and information for decision making to the benefit of the Centre from different entities

within PSOTC, including students’ body. The COOPC is to enhance successful mission

accomplishment - to ensure that contents and performance of courses and other activities

conducted at PSOTC gets as close to perfection and excellence as possible in a cost effective

manner. It will also ensure that common problems and ideas for constant improvement are

communicated directly to the PSOTC decision makers.

2. Participation. The COOPC will meet quarterly, taking into account that the meeting is held

during core courses conducted at the Centre, which would enable participation of students

‘representative at the Meeting. The COOPC will be attended by: the CO (chairperson), CSM,

PAA (Secretary), HEATD, COS, a representative of international staff, representative of civilian

staff and a representative of the students and other members of PSOTC as required.

3. Conduct. The organization of the COOPC Meeting will be responsibility of the CSM. Items for

the agenda should be put forward one week prior to scheduled meetings. The Agenda should

reflect the CO intention to inform personnel on major efforts of the Centre, to discuss specific

issue related to the students welfare, to create space for free and open discussion on any issue or

idea of common interests or interest of specific group presented a the meeting.

4. The sessions of the COOPC will be documented IAW SOP 300 – Annex I, Appendix 1, stored

IAW SOP 300 – Annex N and followed up by the CSM.

Page 70: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

70

SOP 300 – Annex M

Directing Staff Professional Development Programme

1. In order to insure development and maintenance of instructor’s proficiency to common and

acceptable standards, PSOTC will support instructor’s continuing development through Directing

Staff (DSs) Professional Development Programme. The Directing Staff Professional

Development Programme of three phases as follows: Orientation, Induction and Follow up

training. The Programme will be development and managed by ETPD/QMS on behalf of HEDT.

2. Directing Staff Professional Development Programme. The PSOTC is manned by national-BiH

and international DSs. National DSs are selected by a selection board organized within national

chain of command and supported by PSOTC in order to insure that personnel selected for DSs

position at PSOTC meets minimum standards provided in Job Description (see SOP 100). The

national DSs are posted at PSOTC for 3-5 years, while majority of international DSs are selected

by their national authorities and posted for 1-3 years at the Centre. In overall, difference in

deployment time to the Centre to certain extend make constrains on creation of Professional

Development Programme as well as on distribution of duties and responsibilities within the

Centre. The DS Professional Development Programme is shaped into three phases and

encompasses training as shown in DS Professional Development Matrix below:

Position

in ET

Department

Orientation Induction Follow up

PSOTC

Int.

Organization

Briefing

DS

Development

Clinic

ADDIE

Course

NSO

QA

Course

NSO

Peer

Mentoring/Review

Instruction

Monitoring

HETD x x x x x

HETS/MTT

Leader

x x x x x x x

DS x x x x x

CD x x x x x x

CA x x

Timeline –

Activity

finished

First week after

reporting

1/6 months Within a year 1/6 months

a. Orientation phase. During the orientation phase, a DS are briefed on PSOTC and through

number of sessions with different departments (through In-processing Plan) are provided

with info on how the Centre is organized, functions and how ET Department is working.

In addition, a DS will provided with the briefing on PSOTC’s partner International

organizations (UN, NATO and OSCE).

b. Induction phase. Depending on the assigned position, the induction phase provides

opportunity for the DS to develop its competencies needed for the effective performance

on duty as per DS Professional Development Matrix. In this phase, every six months,

HETD will organize the DS Development Clinics. The DS Clinics are one-week thematic

refreshment training for DS, which includes different topics on: NATO SAT,

methodology, student assessment, relevant and new doctrinal subjects etc.

c. Follow up phase. The professional development of DS at PSOTC is considered as a

continuous process, in order to insure that DSs have adequate competencies and up to date

knowledge for successful performance as an instructor. Therefore, initially DS will be

given a senior DS as a mentor to be available to assist newly-arrived DS in preparation for

teaching process. Once peer mentoring is finished, a DS will be given opportunity to have

her/his teaching competencies assessed by HETS or HETD. After first six months, a DS

will have opportunity to develop own competences through attending at least on DS

Clinic per six months as well as different courses conducted at PSOTC. Once this stage is

successfully finished , the national DSs are encouraged to apply to attend career ,

functional or specialized courses, depending on rank or other requirements that condition

their professional development.

Page 71: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

71

3. Minimum standards for Instructor’s Initial Qualification. To be a qualified instructor at PSOTC, a

DS is suppose to fulfill following criteria within the first six months after reporting to:

a. Attend one DS Development Clinic, confirmed by HETS.

b. Obtain one Peer Mentoring Report by assigned DS Mentor (as per template SOP 300 –

Annex M, Appendix 1).

c. Get one positive Instructions Monitoring Report (which is considered to be as a minimum

- Mark “3” for any competency, as per SOP 300 – Annex G) from HETS or HETD.

4. Annual Minimum Standards for Instructor’s Qualification. Every DS will be evaluated on annual

basis. To get annual qualification as an instructor DS is suppose to fulfill following criteria:

a. Attend one DS Development Clinic, confirmed by HETS.

b. Obtain two Peer Review Reports by a peer DS of her/his choosing (as per template SOP

300 – Annex M, Appendix 1).

c. Get two positive Instruction Monitoring Reports (which is considered to be as a

minimum - Mark “3” for any competency, as per SOP 300 – Annex G) from HETS or

HETD.

5. The DS Qualification process is responsibility of HETS within her/his Section, and HETD for

HETS/MTT Leader. The Qualification process has following steps:

a. The HETS will draft, print out and submit DS Qualification Report Form (SOP Annex M

– Appendix 2) to the DS who is entering qualification process a week after reporting or

after the last qualifications.

b. As she / he goes thorough qualification process, the DS will collect signatures and

evaluation reports and hand them over to the HETS by the qualification period.

c. The HETS will submit DS Qualification Report Form to HETD for verification and

signature.

d. The DS Qualification Report will be stored will HETD.

Page 72: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

72

Appendix 1

SOP 300 – Annex M

Peer / Mentoring / Review Report (template)

A.General

Peer Name: Start Time:

Date of observation: End Time:

Course: DS/Lecturer:

Lesson Title: B.DS / Lecturer Competences C. Peer's/Mentor's observations

Supporting Documentation Comments

The lesson is rehearsed and well prepared

Lesson Plan for the period of instructions was

available.

Written guidance to students for syndicate work

was provided.

The lessons title is clearly identified in Course

Critique.

The Lesson is clearly identified in the Course

Schedule.

Lessons Alignment Comments

The aim of the Lesson is clearly stated.

The teaching points presented align with the LO

stated in the CCD III.

The references for the lesson are stated and are

consistent with the CCD III.

The timing for the lesson is consistent with the

CCD III and the Course Schedule.

The syndicate work was aligned with the objectives

outlined in the CCD III.

The instructional strategy used was aligned with the

instructional strategy listed in the CCD III.

The DOK was consistent with the level identified in

the CCD III.

The assessment strategy is consistent with the CCD

III.

Instructional Effectiveness Comments

The training facility was adequately prepared to

deliver instruction.

Supporting materials were readily available.

The facilitator gained and maintained the attention

of the class.

The facilitator established the relevance of what

was being presented to the students.

The teaching points were presented in a logical

sequence.

The facilitator provided relative verbal support

(examples / explanations / statistics).

The visual aids used were clear and supported the

teaching points.

Media used during the lesson were of appropriate

number, duration and quality.

The facilitator engaged the students during the

lesson using effective questioning techniques.

The facilitator emphasized important points /

issues.

The facilitator periodically checked for student

understanding.

Page 73: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

73

The facilitator provided a summary of the main

teaching points at the end of the lesson.

The training facility was adequately prepared to

deliver instruction.

Student Assessment Comments

Assessment details / test Instructions provided to

the student.

The assessment is at the proper DOK for the course.

An answer key or assessment checklist for

syndicate presentations is available.

The assessment is aligned with the course lesson

objectives and CCD III.

The DOK being assessed is consistent with the

LO(s) in the CCD III.

The content assessed aligns with the content

presented during the course.

Students are provided with the results of the

assessment as well as facilitator feedback.

Assessment details / test Instructions provided to

the student.

Additional comments

Mentor: DS/Lecturer:

(siginutre) (siginutre)

Page 74: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

74

Appendix 2

SOP 300 – Annex M

Peace Support Operations Traning Centre

Education and Traning Department

Date:

To:

- Head of Education and Training Department

Subject: DS Qualification Report

Reference: PSOTC SOP 300

1. This is to confirm that XX has fulfilled DS Qualification requirements as per SOP given in the

Reference and to initiate the formal verification.

2. Record of DS Qualification activities:

Requirement Date Remark

DS Development

Clinic

Peer/Mentoring Report 1.

2.

Report enclosed

Instruction Monitoring

Feedback

1.

2.

Report enclosed

Any other activity

Confirmed by Qualification verified by

HETS HETD

_____________ ____________________

Page 75: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

75

SOP 300 – Annex N

Instruction on Information Systems and Knowledge Management

(Available on request)

Page 76: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

76

SOP 300 – Annex O

Communication and Public Affairs

Introduction

1. Purpose. The purpose of SOP 300 – Annex O is to instruct responsibilities, system and

procedures for planning, organization and execution of the communication (internally and

externally) and Public Affairs in PSOTC order to support management of the core process inside

and to create positive perception on outputs and credibility of the Centre itself outside - in the

public domain.

2. The structure. This Annex is organized in two parts – the first part is related to the organization

and management the internal and external communication and the second part of the Annex is

related to the public relations.

3. Responsibilities. Overall responsibility for planning, organization and revision of communication

and public affairs policies and strategy rests with Public Affair Associate (PAA), who reports

directly to the Commandant.

Organization of the Internal and External Communication

4. Purpose. The internal communication means establishment and management of the effective

information sharing mechanisms and tools in order to provide timely and effective

communication within the Centre that would ensure application, review and improvement of

quality insurance procedures in the core management processes in the Centre. The external

communication refers to establishment of regular and timely communication between PSOTC

and partner agencies on matters of common interest.

5. Organization. The internal and external communication is organized around following factors

(which are represented in the Communication Matrix below): frequency, mechanism, content,

media and character of the communication (internal/external).

6. The mechanisms for communication consist of:

a. Command Group Meeting (CGM) - CO, COS, HETD and CSM.

b. Chief’s of Staff Meeting (COSM) - COS, Head of sections in the Staff.

c. Course Director’s Hot Wash-up (CDHW) - CD with DS Team.

d. Course Directors’ Daily Address (CDDA) – The CD will address to the students every

morning prior teaching.

e. Training Coordination Meeting (TCM) – HETD with all DSs.

f. National ET Briefing (NETB) –The NETB is delivered to TRADOC.

g. Cooperation Committee Meetings (COOPCM) – See SOP Annex –

h. Academic Management Board (AMB) – See SOP Annex

i. Quality Management Committee (QMC) – See SOP Annex

j. Partnership Training and Education Centres Market Place and Commandants’

Conference (PTEC MP/CC)

k. Friends of PSOTC Meeting (FoPM) – Annual Meeting of PSOTC partner organizations

and nations.

l. Functional offices, departments, sections (CO, HETD, COS, PAA, CSM, ETPD/QMS).

Page 77: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

77

Communication Matrix

Effect Mechanism

Medium Character

F/F e-m Tel. Int. Ext.

DAILY

Ensure effective management CGM x x

Support activities COSM x x

Ensure effective delivery of ET CDHW x x

Address students’ requirements CDDA x x x x

Coordinate partner/joint projects ETPD/QSM x x x x

Ensure application of QA Policy All x x x x

Apply ACT e-Prime management ETPD/QSM x x

Ensure application of SAT in ET HETD x x x x

WEEKLY

Ensure effective management CGM x x

Support activities COSM x x

Ensure effective delivery of ET TCM x x

Apply ACT e-Prime management ETPD/QSM x x

Ensure application of QA Policy All x x x x

MONTHLY

Report to TRADOC HQ CO x x x

Inform all staff on progress/plans CO x x

Inform NCO core on progress/plans CSM

Review Training Calendar HETD x x x x

QUARTERLY

Review students welfare COOPCM x x

Review organizational performance NETB x x x

Open applications for a course CD

Publish Curriculum changes ETPD/QMS x x x

Report executed ACT accred. courses ETPD/QMS x x

BI-ANNUAL

Review QA Policy QMC x x

Review organizational performance AMB x x

Report to TRADOC HQ CO x x x

ANNUAL

Issue Training Calendar AMB x x x x

Issue Course Catalogue PAA x x x x

Request resources support COS x x

Issue bidding letter MTTs/students ETPD/QMS x

Inform community of interest PTEC MP/CC x x

Apply ACT e-Prime management ETPD/QMS x x

Report to TRADOC CO x x x

Report to the partners FoPM x x

Legend:

-F/F: Face to face; - e-m: E-mail; - Tel: Telephone; - Int.: Internal; - Ext: External

7. Documentation and record. All meetings will be recorded in accordance with SOP 300 Annex I

and Annex N.

Page 78: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

78

Organization of the Public Affairs

8. Reference. The PSOTC Public Affairs (PA) Policy steams from the Ministry of Defense BiH

(MoD) Public Affairs Policy, and the MoD BiH Directives for Implementing Public Affairs

Activities.

9. Purpose. The PSOTC Public Affairs Policy defines basic concepts the MoD and AF BiH use,

including: public information, jurisdiction, information dissemination dynamics, media relations,

and media reporting tracking.

10. Mission. The Public affairs mission is to support credibility of PSOTC by providing accurate

information within specific period of time in order to improve awareness and understanding

about PSOTC's role, goals, and activities.

11. Principles. The PSOTC Public Affairs Associate (PAA) conducts the PA mission professionally

and effectively through establishment and maintaining of public affairs active approach.

Delivered information to the public has to be accurate and on time and has to relate to activities,

results, and achievements of PSOTC as an integral part of the Armed Forces of Bosnia and

Herzegovina (AF BiH). In addition, the PA will adhere to the following principles, based on the

Public Affairs Policy of the MoD and AF BiH:

a. Media requests as well as other interested persons requests for information from the

scope of PSOTC's work – PSOTC forwards all requests to MoD BiH and informs the Joint

Staff of AF BiH (JS AF BiH) and TRADOC about it. The MoD BiH Public Affairs Office

(MoD PAO) delivers feedback to the PSOTC.

b. Respond on a request of public has to be in the shortest possible period of time.

c. Information forwarded to the superior commands has to be complete and signed by the

PSOTC Commandant.

d. There is obligation to check security classification prior to delivering of information.

e. No deny of information as classified to Medias if they are not officially classified.

f. Media activities have to have credibility internally as well publicly.

g. The PSOTC PAA (PAA) IAW given authority maintains communication with media.

h. No hasty execution of media operations. They are an integral part of every plan. The media

operations end state is to have information concrete, relevant, and on time IAW intent of

operation execution and superior's orders.

12. Relations with media. The PAA uses following communication methods in communication

with media: contacts with journalists; interview with employees; briefing reports; press

release; press conferences; response to the media; informing through Course Catalogue;

brochures, magazines, and the MoD and AF BiH Newsletter; informing through PSOTC and

MoD BiH web site; transfer of audio and video recordings; MoD and AF BiH information

campaign; involvement in exercises and other activities.

13. Press Appearance Procedures. Following procedure will be observed related to the press

appearance:

a. The Minister of Defense BiH approves press appearance and publishing of information

IAW the Law on Defense BiH, the Law on Service in the AF BiH (Official Gazette BiH

No 88-05) and the MoD BiH Public Affairs Policy.

b. The Minister of Defense BiH approves press appearance requests of PSOTC members

on recommendation of JS AF BiH.

Page 79: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

79

c. The Minister of Defense BiH approves requests for planned and not planned PSOTC

activity media presentation recommended by JS AF BiH. Approval is only for the

specific framework of person giving media presentation and press statements IAW

jurisdictions and the MoD BiH Public Affairs Policy.

d. The Minister of Defense BiH can give an approval for press appearance for a longer

period of time in the case of affirmative activities for AF BiH, peace support mission

and exercise contribution and they all have to be IAW the MoD BiH Public Affairs

Policy.

e. PAA submits written press appearance requests for approval through official channels.

For not planned activities, PAA submits request directly to MoD PAO (to superior

command only as information). MoD BiH transfers back approved or not approved

request through official channels to the request originator.

14. Media presentation. Following procedures will aplly for media presentation:

a. PSOTC submits media presentation plan through chain of command NLT 15th of

current month for next month.

b. PAA submits media presentation requests for activities not planned or not covered by

regular media presentation plan directly to MoD PAO in the form of the additional

media presentation plan NLT 48 hours prior to activity execution (to superior command

only as information).

c. PSOTC submits media invitations to attend events and activities in PSOTC through

MoD PAO. If media presence planned, PAA submits media invitations together with

media presentation plan (regular or additional). PSOTC submits public media requests

to MoD PAO within 48 hours.

d. PAA submits the PSOTC Media Presentation Plan Analysis NLT 17th in current month

through the chain of command.

15. The management of PSOTC web site. The PSOTC owns its web site www.psotc.org. PAA is

responsible to choose content, to prepare and update web news and photos in cooperation S-6

Section and the CD. The S-6 Section is responsible for uploading aforementioned information

on the PSOTC web site. Following process and procedures will aply for publishing on

PSOTC’ web site:

a. PAA will receive all information needed for news updates from persons responsible

for activity implementation or from personnel involved in a specific activity (CD,

activity coordinator).

b. When all pieces of information are available, PAA creates web site content (news,

photos, promo material, etc...). PAA delivers the content in a form of electronic

document into regular administrative procedure to the Chief of Staff for approval.

Once approved, PAA delivers the content to the Section S-6 to publish it

c. PAA delivers Information relevant and important to the MoD and AF BiH directly to

the MoD PAO who is going to publish it on their web site.

16. All other aspects related to planning, preparation and conduct of the PA is to be done IAW

separate PSOTC SOP on PA.

Page 80: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

80

SOP 400. Instruction on Support and Resource Management

(Missing parts of the Chapter are available on request)

1. Purpose. The purpose of SOP 400 is to lay down responsibilities, objectives, procedures and

processes for planning, implementation and revision of the human, logistics and financial

resource management as well as for administrative, security and IT support that would enable

provision of high quality support to the students, the staff and core activities at PSOTC.

2. Structure. The Instruction is structured as follows:

a. Quality Assurance Objectives

b. Responsibilities for support and resources management

c. Current PSOTC’s capacities and capabilities in support of training activities

d. Personnel management

e. Security of information, personnel and material

f. Students’ administrative support

g. Logistics resources management

h. Financial management

i. IT support

3. Quality Assurance Objectives for Support and Resource Management are to:

a. Ensure effective personnel management that would mirror organizational values and support

achievements of institutional objective,

b. Plan, organize, coordinate and review security of information, personnel and material in

order to set conditions for safe, secure and uninterrupted functioning of the Centre,

c. Provide efficient logistics support that would meet training requirements and enable

successful execution of the core management processes,

d. Ensure financial management, in accordance with national rules and regulations, based on

Center’s needs and priorities that would enable effective activity execution, support and

Center’s development,

e. Provide effective administrative support that would provide smooth and secure in-out

processing and that would meet daily administrative requirements of the students and the

staff,

f. Establish and maintain efficient, secure and effective IT support that would enable

uninterrupted management and training delivery

in order to support execution of the mission of the Centre in a quality and customer-oriented most

efficient and effective manner.

4. Responsibilities for Support and Resource Management are as follows:

a. Chief of Staff (COS) is responsible to the Commandant for support and resource

management at the Centre. The COS is overall responsible for management of all

organizational sections (explained below) within the Staff of PSOTC.

b. Personnel Section (S-1) is responsible to the COS for personnel management, which

includes planning, development and monitoring of personnel management polices and

systems for management of personnel careers, duty retention, education and training.

c. Section for Operations (S-2/3) is responsible to the COS for planning and execution of all

operational activities in support of the staff of the Centre that include: common staff training,

shooting and physical training test. The S-3 is at the same time Security office in the Centre,

Page 81: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

81

responsible for: development and execution of security policies and procedures, initiation of

security clearance, provision of ID cards and organization and execution of escorts in

cooperation with EUFOR HQ.

d. Logistics Section (S-4) is responsible to the COS for planning, execution and analysis of

logistical operations that include: supply, maintenance, transportation, medical support,

environment and fire protection.

e. Communication and Information Systems Section (S-6) is responsible to the COS for

planning, organization, monitoring and maintenance and procurement priorities of

information, audio-video and telecommunication systems in the Centre.

f. Material – Financial and Budgeting Section (BUDFIN) is responsible to the COS for

material-financial and budget management that include planning, execution and control of

material and financial management in the Centre in accordance with national laws, rules and

regulations.

Detailed responsibilities for each Section and function within a Section are given in PSOTC

Administrative SOP, which is complementary to this SOP and obligatory for implementation in

the Centre.

5. Current PSOTC’s capacities and capabilities in support of training activities. The PSOTC’s

building is purpose built in Camp EUFOR in Butmir, 10 km south of Sarajevo, in 2004. The

building provides excellent working, training and learning conditions. This overview will provide

information on PSOTC’s: teaching facilities, accommodation and feeding, transportation and

learning enabling support.

a. Teaching facilities. Teaching facilities at the Centre include:

1) 1 x IT/VTC equipped auditorium for up to 60 participants.

2) 5 x IT/AV equipped syndicate rooms for up to 8 participants/each.

3) 3 x IT/AV equipped syndicate rooms for up to 12 (to 30) participants/each, depending on

the layout.

4) 1 x Library with English Language Lab for up to 5 participants.

b. Accommodation and feeding. The Centre is hosted in EUFOR Camp Butmir, where

accommodation building with 40 single rooms is provided by EUFOR HQ on commercial

basis to PSOTC. PSOTC can request more accommodation capacity from EUFOR as

required. Hot meals are provided on commercial basis in EUFOR’s dining facility.

c. Transportation. The Centre has its own vehicles (passenger, off-road, van and minibuses) to

support daily conduct of the training on the base or outside in the field. In case of increase

of transportation requirements, the Centre can rely on assistance by supporting logistical unit

of the Armed Forces of BiH.

d. Learning enabling support. The students have available library on request as well as small

English Language Lab.

6. Personnel management – Available on request

7. Security of information, personnel and material- Available on request of the authorized

personnel.

8. Administrative support to the students

a. Application for the course. The students can apply for the courses at PSOTC through

sending authority, based on the invitation letter and through e-Prime. By sending out the

invitation letter to a course, participants’ Application Form (as per SOP 300) will be

attached. With the participants Application Form all relevant data are requested and

Page 82: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

82

collected, processed and disseminated by CA as per SOP 300. The instructions on

subsequent correspondence by the CA with the participants are given in SOP 300.

b. Local transportation. The Centre will provide pick – up/drop off for all international

participants and PSOTC visitors arriving to Sarajevo airport/railway/bus station

c. Reporting and In-Processing. Reporting and in-processing will take place during the first two

days of the course, depending on whether a participant is national or international, and in

accordance with the Course Schedule. In general, international participants are to report 24

hrs before the start of the course, while national ones are to report on the morning of the start

of the course. The In-processing will be coordinated by the CA and executed by the Staff

Sections as per SOP 300 and PSOTC Admin SOP. During the In-processing the emphasis

will be on practical arrangements – registering for Access Cards, handing over medical

records (if needed), in-processing into the accommodation, handover of course students

equipment and material, administrative briefings etc.

d. Access ID Cards. The S-3 Section will request, coordinate and provide access cards from

EUFOR ID office for course participants based on the list received from BUDFIN office and

students Application Forms and associated supporting documents from the CA within 24 hrs

upon the reception of required request and NLT D-15.

e. Accommodation and meals. The accommodation and meals will be provided as to the

students as instructed in Recourse and Financial Management of this SOP.

f. Student Code of Conduct. The Student code of conducted is regulated by SOP 300.

g. Approval and Administration of Students Leave. The absence of part or whole day may be

authorised for students by the HETD. The absences for two or more days must be authorised

by the Comdt. A copy of the approved leave request has to be handed over to the CD and S1

for registration.

h. Course and syndicate duty student. A course duty student will be appointed by a CD on daily

basis in coordination and with Syndicate DSs. The Syndicate DS will nominate Syndicate

Duty Student on daily basis. The list of Course duty students will be published in a Course

Schedule, while Syndicate DS List will be produced for each syndicate by the Syndicate DS.

i. Learning support.

1) Printing support. The students will have printing capacities in each syndicate for daily

routine printing of training support material. However, if printing excide exceeds

available printing capacities in the Syndicate, the students will address request to the

CA through Syndicate DS.

2) IT Support. At the PSOTC school building there are about 20 desktop computers,

besides personally issued laptops, that the students can use on Student subnet (syndicate

rooms, library, accommodation). The Student net is connected to the Internet through

the firewall and users have limited access through proxy servers. No classified

documents will be stored on these computers.

3) Use of PSOTC Library English Language Lab. The PSOTC Library/Lab will be staffed

during PSOTC working hours and at such other times as may be required by the course

programme in accordance with SOP 300 and based on the CD request to HETD.

j. Student’s welfare. In order to create conducive learning environment the CD will plan and

organize welfare program for the students that includes free of charge:

1) Use of the gym and sports terrain and equipment on the Camp.

2) Professionally guided Sarajevo cultural tour.

Page 83: version of the Policy is available on request.mod.gov.ba/foto2015/20160125_PSOTC QA Policy.pdfSACT Supreme Allied Commander Transformation SAGE SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on Education,

83

3) Course official dinner.

4) Refreshments during the course.

k. Medical support. In case of an emergency, the students will address to the CA or PSOTC

Duty Officer out of working hours. For emergency cases, the students can use the First aid

station on the Camp. Any other treatment will be forwarded to Sarajevo University Hospital

where treatment expenses are responsibility of sending authority. This info musty be

communicated to the sending authorities in the course invitation letter.

l. Out – Processing. The Out processing of the PSOTC students will take place on the last two

days of the course and it will be coordinated by the CA and executed by the Staff Sections as

per SOP 300 and PSOTC Admin SOP. The day before graduation, students will hand back

all training material to S-4. On the last day of the course, the students will have check out

process according to the following sequences:

1) Check-Out from the Accommodation Building. This will include cleaning their room

spaces, handing back bed linen and set of room keys. The students are required to leave

their rooms NLT 0830 hours. The responsible Section is S-4.

2) Hand back of PSOTC issued keys / magnetic card to S-4.

3) The students are required to settle all bills and dues before leaving the PSOTC with

BUDFIN through the CA.

4) Return of issued EUFOR Access Cards to the escort organized by S-3, or to a PSOTC

driver for international students leaving the Camp after working hours. The CA will

coordinate return of IDs.

9. Logistics resources management – Available on request

10. Financial management – Available on request

11. IT support. The IT support in the Centre will be planed, organized and overseen by Section S-6

in accordance with national rules/regulation, PSOTC Admin. SOP and section 300 of this SOP.

12. Annexes. -

A. PSOTC Key Staff Current Professional Development Overview – Available only to

authorised personnel

B. PSOTC Teaching Facilities Management Plan - Available on request