WORCESTERSHIRE LOCAL ENTERPRISE PARTNERSHIP BOARDThursday 24 January 2013 3.00pm - 5.00pm

Coomber Electronics, Brindley Road, Warndon, Worcester WR4 9FD

AGENDA

1. Welcome and Apologies (5 mins)

2. Minutes from the Board Meetings 22 November 2012and 9 January 2013 (5 mins)

3. Matters Arising (5 mins)- Action List

4. LEP Cyber Strategy (20 mins)- Presentation by Emma Philpott, Key IQ Limited

5. Manufacturing Study – Gary Woodman (5 mins)

6. WLEP Business Plan – Working Session (40 mins)- on Strategic Objective 1 – National Profile and Promotion

7. LEP Funding and Accounts (15 mins)

8. Chair’s Report (10 mins)

9. Executive Director’s Report (10 mins)

10. National LEPs’ Business Plan Status (5 mins)

11. Any Other Business

LEP Board 2013 Meetings - All 3.00 p.m. – 5.00 p.m.

24 January 2013 Coomber Electronics10 April 2013 (Review/Forward Look) Venue TBC23 May 2013 LEP Office25 July 2013 LEP Office26 September 2013 LEP Office28 November 2013 LEP Office

DRAFTMINUTES OF WORCESTERSHIRE LOCAL ENTERPRISE PARTNERSHIP

1

BOARD MEETING

Thursday 22 November 2012 3.00pm – 5.00pmLEP Office, Brindley Court, Gresley Road, Warndon Worcestershire WR4 9FD

PRESENT:Peter Pawsey (Chair) (PP) Chairman Robert West and Director Midland HeartAlan White (AW) MD Malvern Hills Science ParkDean Attwell (DA) MD Oakland International Clllr Simon Geraghty (SG) Deputy Leader Worcestershire County CouncilCllr John Campion (JC) Leader, Wyre Forest District Council (rep Northern DCs)Ed Webb (EW) Executive Chairman Webbs of WychboldCarl Arntzen (CA) MD Worcester Bosch Thermotechnology Cllr David Hughes (DH) Leader, Malvern Hills District Council (rep Southern DCs)John Callaghan (JCal) Principal, North East Worcestershire College

IN ATTENDANCE:Gary Woodman (GW) Worcestershire LEPClaire Bridges (CB) Worcestershire LEPCarole Rudolf (CR) Worcestershire LEPAhmed Goga (AG) Worcestershire County CouncilNigel Hudson Worcestershire County Council

1. Welcome and Introduction

Peter Pawsey (Chair) welcomed the board. He went on to inform everyone that at the WLEP Business Board Dean Attwell and Carl Arntzen were formally elected to replace Tony Hyde and Richard Soper on the WLEP Board. Dean Attwell was elected Business Board Chair and Carl Arntzen Vice Chair. PP then congratulated John Callaghan on his appointment to the Employment Skills Board and Stuart Laverick from Worcester College of Technology will be the alternate.

The six vacancies on the WLEP Business Board have now been filled. The new members are Jacqui Bayliss – Harris Lamb Property, Rebecca Widdowson – Hallmark Hulme, Chris Akers – Titan Steel Wheels, Paul Alekna – e-Response Recruitment, Steve Borwell-Fox – borwell Limited and Steve Speller – Speller Metcalfe.

It was agreed that a structure diagram of the WLEP would be produced and circulated before the next Board Meeting.

GW

2. Minutes of the Board meeting – Thursday 20 September 2012

The Minutes were agreed as a true record.

3. Matters Arising

2

Action List1. Highways Agency Pinch Point Programme : A letter was received

regarding the Pinch Point Programme in relation to Junction 4 of the M5 and A46 Junction 9 of the M5. The Junction 4 scheme was included in the Highways Agency announcement and the Junction 9 scheme is expected in round 3 of the programme which is to be announced.

2. Website : The new website was successfully launched at ‘The Outlook is Bright’ conference.

3. Brown Signs Pilot: GW updated the input from businesses regarding their signage issues. This would be addressed from January with a member of Peter Blake’s team.

GW highlighted that this would include the county boundary signs which were in need of updating. It had been agreed with Peter Blake that the WLEP would have input into this process. Other ideas for consideration to be forwarded to GW.

4. Other Actions : All other actions are covered later in the Minutes.

John Campion questioned the process for putting together the Agenda and asked were we following the procedures outlined in the Governance Review. GW highlighted that the mechanisms for feeding into Board agendas had been established but timings and the cycle of meetings were not yet in place. This would be implemented going forward.PP referred to the Governance Paper in terms of the time commitment and role of the Board members, where each member had a role and actions as a structure for operating the WLEP.

Approvals and Letters of Support1. The Greater Birmingham & Solihull LEP Response to White Paper :

Thank you to those of you who commented on the Greater Birmingham and Solihull LEP response. This was submitted on Friday in accordance with their deadline.

2. South Worcestershire Development Plan re Malvern Hills DC : This was the letter sent before the Extraordinary Meeting on 13 November. DH thanked the WLEP for the letter, and explained the current position where the difficulty remained around the housing allocation in Newland and the greenbelt. All three of the South Worcestershire Local Authorities were now reviewing their position in relation to this decision, although it was hoped that much of the new plans would be formulated and moved forward as soon as possible. It was likely that this would create a delay in the adoption of a plan for the 3 South Worcestershire districts.

AW raised a concern re the expansion of the Malvern Hills Science Park. DH recognised that there were issues to be resolved.

3. West Midlands Transportation Summit : This was noted by the Board.

ALL

3

4. APPG LEP Update : PP attended the AGM recently held in Westminster where he gave a progress report to MPs which was well received.

5. Department for Transport Letter re Great Western Franchise : Following the WLEP letter to DfT re the Great Western franchise, a response has been received regarding the postponement of the tender process. This was noted as a positive step as it gave all partners further opportunities to lobby for the implementation of Parkway in the new contract.

4. Chair’s Report

The Chair’s report was circulated. Today GW & PP met with the Leader and CEO of Bromsgrove District Council. This was a constructive and positive meeting in relation to the progress of the WLEP. They were satisfied with the Business Plan and wanted to work with the WLEP regarding the Bromsgrove Technology Park in relation to PXP who market the site.

1. Feedback on Conference : PP reported that their had been positive feedback through a variety of means. Results of text polling were noted. DH also reported positive feedback. It was acknowledged that the bar had been set high and we have now got to deliver. SG also commented on the positive speakers.

2. National LEP Network : Following the National LEP Network’s successful lobbying on core funding, they were due to report on the national studies and surveys of the 39 LEPs in the next 2 months. Our thanks went to David Frost for speaking at the WLEP conference.

3. WM Chairs Meeting : Paperwork to be prepared for Transport Summit.

4. Other Cross Border Working : PP & GW met with the Gloucestershire LEP re possible joint working in connection with transport and infrastructure and the key sectors where we had common interest, particularly tourism, manufacturing and defence.

There is a South Midlands LEP grouping which includes Oxfordshire, Thames Valley, Coventry & Warwickshire and Swindon & Wiltshire which we would be joining. SG asked about Business Plan progress in other LEPs. It was agreed to submit a summary of other Business Plans.

AW was meeting Hereford Enterprise Zone with the purpose of discussing and agreeing with them that no job displacement and competition against the Science Park would occur. The Board agreed that AW would have the authority to conduct these negotiations on behalf of the WLEP and report back.

GW

CB

AW

4

5. Executive Director’s Report

Growing Places Fund: GW outlined launch of Round 2 prospectus. No bids were received by the deadline. Number of talks ongoing but must be aware of timelines, enquiries continue. The Board agreed that the Executive should open negotiations with

WCCC regarding extra funding of up to £½m.

Hoo Brook Link Road was progressing under the banner of Greater Birmingham and WLEP project. The Link Road was targeted to commence in January. EW to be lead Board Member on looking at how we would promote the Growing Places Scheme to private sector potentials. It was also acknowledged that the key game changer sites may require some Growing Places funding. The Board agreed both courses of action would be followed with decisions to be made by a Sub Group lead by EW.

The Board did however discuss reflection of the lack of demand linked to the current state of the commercial development market in Worcestershire.

Regional Growth Fund 3: Progressing with West Midlands LEP bid on Green Bridge. GW to chase on the delivery working group of the scheme. The West Midlands LEP Executive meeting will take place on 5 December where this will be raised.

Sector Research – Cyber Strategy/Manufacturing Study: This is in the final stages before publication. We are still reviewing the final document. However, in the meantime AW and Steve Borwell-Fox, Emma Philpott and Stephen Brain had a meeting yesterday regarding potentially bidding for ERDF funding to deliver some of the recommendations of the strategy. The Board agreed that opportunities which were part of EU open calls that are deadlined for 30 November need to be taken even if the strategy has not been approved by them at this meeting.

A similar study is required on Worcestershire’s manufacturing sector. Chris Akers has been put forward to outline the potential needs of the survey. This will be undertaken in the new year. Carl Arntzen would be the lead Board Member.

GW

GW

GW/AW

CA

6. WLEP Business Plan – Going Forward

Objectives/Targets timeline: GW explained that the timeline was a summary of the outline business plans which were part of the Business Plan and the programme of activity outlined within it. GW outlined that the period between now and March were the key priorities in relation to Qtr1 delivery of the Business Plan. It was agreed that business cases would be developed in the interim to come before the Board in January to discuss further. A number of actions involved delivery partners and not the WLEP directly. In these cases the Board just needs to be aware of progress. Board Members will need to commit to lead action areas as part of their allotted time which the Governance Review demanded of

5

them. Board Members can also use their external contacts to help support delivery of the WLEP ambitions. SG suggested a ½ day session to decide on how to deliver these areas and implement the Governance Review.Date to be found in the new year.

Business Board and Sub Groups: GW said that Business Board and Sub Groups need to be established with clear Terms of Reference. These Sub Groups would involve not just members of the Business Board but partners from the public sector and those business individuals who had either expressed an interest or could offer expertise to achieve the LEPs goals. DA suggested that the agenda for the first quad meeting would look at Sub Groups and potential leads. AW stated that we needed to be mindful of not just creating our own Sub Groups but also ensuring that we were also represented on regional Sub Groups.

Strategic Objective 4 – Planning, Development & Infrastructure: Nigel Hudson talked through a presentation on Worcester Technology Park (see attached). It was agreed that a 2-page update on the Technology Park and its submission into BIS regarding the regional growth fund Round 1 would be circulated to all Board Members as Central Government lobbying may be required in order to secure the funding to develop this site.

Following Nigel’s presentation JCal asked if there was room for Redditch Eastern Gateway and Worcester Technology Park. In answering Nigel said that there was room for both as each of the four game changer sites served a different market and had a different focus. SG assured the Board that the County Council were committed to all the

game changer sites, in particular the Technology Park, and a significant allocation of budget had been made available at risk. EW asked if developers were being approached re developing the site. It was confirmed that a number of conversations were taking place to ensure that the private sector were wholly involved in the delivery of the Technology Park as a commercial opportunity. PP thanked Nigel for his time.

Planning and Development Charter: CB summarised activities since the May 2012 Business Plan business/public/third sector workshops and recommended the adoption of the Worcestershire Planning and Development Charter. The Charter has been produced jointly by WLEP and Worcestershire Local Planning Authorities (LPAs) as a key first action. This follows good practice recommended by BIS and is being rapidly adopted by other LEPs. CB explained that the Charter is the marketing tool and statement to the external world of statutory consultees, businesses, inward investors, developers, agents etc that Worcestershire is open for business and establishing a business-friendly planning system to attract inward investment while supporting existing business growth. It is now important for all parties to facilitate change and deliver through tangible projects to demonstrate that change is happening and making the Charter real. The WLEP will organise a Forum comprising a range of business interests (land-owners, developers, agents etc) to interact with the LPAS and Chief Planning Officers’ Group to drive change forwards

GW

N Hudson

CB

6

through joint contributions, knowledge and expertise. The actions will be captured and developed in the Delivery Plan for WLEP Strategic Objective 4 being led by the forthcoming LEP Sub Group for this objective. A Memorandum of Understanding between the WLEP and Worcestershire Partnership is also being developed.

7. LEP Funding & Accounts

Core Funding: In September Government announced that LEPs will receive funding for core operational costs. A one-off payment of £125,000 is being made for 2012/13. Ministers have clear expectations that strategy for local growth document should be published by the end of 2012, which is our Business Plan.

2013/14 &2014/15: There are three core requirements for applying for funding in these two years:

i) that the LEP secures and provides an explanation of local match funding on equal value against future draw down of resource;

ii) that the LEP has a clear set of published strategic priorities for its economic growth in its area;

iii) that the LEP submits an outline budget, which summarises overall spend/planned spend for the funding period of 2013/14 – 2014/15 and confirms that a local agreement has been reached as to how the 2012/13 interim funding should be spent. This should also include commentary of progress towards a locally self-sustained budget.

A core funding application document needs to be submitted no later than 15 February 2013.

We encourage Chairs to challenge their partners in ensuring that this offer of central funding is exploited to the full by levering in eligible matched funding, thereby ensuring that the LEP is able to access the full Government offer of £250,000 per year.

A current position statement of accounts was issued and agreed, although a full cash flow report and budget will be signed off at the next Board Meeting with support from WCCC.

GW/WCCC

8. Regulatory & Business Charter - Actions

CB confirmed that since the launch of the WLEP Regulators and Business Partnership Charter on 9 November, a working group comprising local and national regulators had met to begin developing the action plan to deliver the Charter. CB also explained that Worcestershire’s progress on this agenda had attracted BIS interest and some supporting funding to help establish a LEP Board champion, a Charter action plan, a local/national regulators’ group and a business engagement strategy to ensure joint business/regulators solutions to deliver change. EW asked about the business engagement strategy and CB confirmed that this will

CB

7

be scoped out and based around existing membership organisations and businesses network meetings in the first instance. CB welcomed interest and suggestions from the Board as this initiative develops.

9. Armed Forces Covenant - Actions

CB referred to a request by Business Board members to explore ways in which the WLEP can help deliver the Armed Forces Covenant through practical business-to-Armed Forces initiatives. CB has met the representative of Brigadier Gerhard Wheeler who is the Midland’s representative at the Ministry of Defence incorporating Worcestershire. The Brigadier’s office is keen to develop joint initiatives which focus around existing personnel from the Armed Forces taking up career prospects with Worcestershire businesses as well as exploring the opportunities for flexible Reservist placements in the longer term. CB and the Brigadier’s office will scope out and develop pilot initiatives to be presented to the LEP Business Board in March 2013 by the Brigadier. AW volunteered to be the LEP Board champion on this initiative.

CB and AW

10.

No Stone Unturned, Heseltine Review

The Heseltine Review has been launched. WLEP has been asked by the LEP Network to respond to the LEP-focussed recommendations. It was agreed that the WLEP response would be circulated to the Board as soon as possible as intelligence suggests that a response to the review will be made at the Autumn Statement on 5 December 2012. AW highlighted the fascinating skills report regarding health and beauty versus training of engineers and technical skills. JCal responded by saying that hair and beauty trainees often ended up in customer service roles and therefore the title of the course should not be confused with the transferrable skills gained through attainment.

GW/CB

11.

Any Other Business

There was a discussion about the WLEP Board meeting times. It was agreed that 3.00 – 5.00 p.m. remains the most suitable time for all meetings in 2013. SG and CA informed the meeting that they would be unable to attend the Away Day in March. It was agreed that the Away Day dates would be reviewed and new dates found.

It was agreed that an Extraordinary Board Meeting in early January would be useful to ensure all processes, priorities and principles of working were established before the next Board Meeting date of 24 January 2013.

GW

GW

Next LEP Board Meeting

24 January 2013 - 3.00pm to 5.00pm

8

LEP Offices, Brindley Court, Gresley Road, Warndon, Worcester, WR4 9FD

DRAFTMINUTES OF WORCESTERSHIRE LOCAL ENTERPRISE PARTNERSHIP

BOARD MEETING

Wednesday, 9 January 2013 3.00pm – 5.00pmLEP Office, Brindley Court, Gresley Road, Warndon Worcestershire WR4 9FD

PRESENT:Peter Pawsey (Chair) (PP) Chairman Robert West and Director Midland HeartAlan White (AW) MD Malvern Hills Science ParkDean Attwell (DA) MD Oakland International Cllr Simon Geraghty (SG) Deputy Leader Worcestershire County CouncilCllr John Campion (JC) Leader, Wyre Forest District Council (rep Northern DCs)Ed Webb (EW) Executive Chairman Webbs of WychboldCarl Arntzen (CA) MD Worcester Bosch Thermotechnology Cllr David Hughes (DH) Leader, Malvern Hills District Council (rep Southern DCs)John Callaghan (JCal) Principal, North East Worcestershire College

IN ATTENDANCE:Gary Woodman (GW) Worcestershire LEPCarole Rudolf (CR) Worcestershire LEPSusan Crow (sc) Worcestershire County Council

APOLOGIES:Claire Bridges (CB) Worcestershire LEP

9

1. Welcome and Apologies

Peter Pawsey (Chair) welcomed the board and noted apologies.

2. Governance Review Implementation

PP reviewed the various Boards and Sub Groups, including end of term dates for WLEP Board. A discussion took place on Finance, Audit, Risk and Appointments Committee representatives. It was suggested that the Private Sector members of the committee be made up as follows. Francis Christie and Tony King were approved by the Board with one of these members Chairing the Committee. The Board suggested that the Public Sector representatives were from the Local Authority Chief Executives. GW to take this point to the LEP Liaison Meeting on Friday, 11 January. It was agreed that the appointments to this committee would be confirmed at the next Board Meeting on 24 January.

GW

3. Sub Groups – Structure and Terms of Reference

GW explained the structure, each strategic objective having a sub group. In taking

these in order:

Planning and DevelopmentOn the Place Shaping Group we have Jacqui Bayliss- Harris Lamb and Business Board member, Pete Cullen – Structural Engineer and Andrew Plant – St Francis Group. As these need to be representatives of the Private Sector, the LEP is currently developing a working group chaired by Jacqui Bayliss of developers, agents and land owners.

Employment and SkillsThe existing Board has a vacancy which needs to be filled to have a strong link into the LEP Board. It was agreed that Carl Arntzen would take on the role of Chair of this Board.

The other groups are still emerging, although it was felt important that Chairs of these groups be identified.

National Profile and PromotionMike Ashton

Access to FinanceRoy Irish – GW gave a brief update of Roy’s background, stating that Roy was willing to sit on Regional Finance Forum. AW pointed out that this was a critical area.

It was suggested that the Chair formally accepts the post and has input 10

into populating these groups from both Public and Private Sector. DA suggested that Terms of Reference would also been drawn together by these groups and presented to a future Board. DA suggested that once Chairs has been agreed, that they select their own group, with guidance from Board members. This was approved by the Board. GW stated that he was currently meeting on a 1-to-1 basis with all existing Business Board members to ascertain involvement with sub groups. AW questioned how the role and remit of these sub groups was going to fit into the overall strategy. DW answered by highlighting the need for them to have directions set by the Board, tight Terms of Reference with focused outcomes. SG reinforced the importance of focusing on fewer outcomes and doing them well.

Within the suggested LEP structure AW questioned our cross-LEP activity. GW explained that this was covered though Regional Groups, both West Midlands Executive and West Midlands Chairs and also through CB’s role.

Task to finish groups were agreed on the Cyber Sector, Chaired by Steve Borwell-Fox (Business Board member), Horticulture and Food, Chaired by Ed Webb (Board member) and Manufacturing, Chaired by Carl Arntzen (Board member).

It was agreed that reports need to come back to the Board in order to provide them with support guidance and to break down any barriers to delivery.

4. Board Papers – Presentation and Timings

GW explained the structure and went through the timings. It was suggested that time slots be added to the agenda thus ensuring sufficient time allocated to important agenda items. It was also agreed to structure the agenda so that items requiring approval were moved up the agenda and items for information only moved down the agenda.

GW

5. Executive Team Staffing Structure

GW distributed a document listing new posts required to the Executive Team, explaining the current format and the advantages of taking on additional staff. Job descriptions have been prepared. Posts would be for an initial fixed term period of 12 months with the possibility of a secondment. AW asked if there was sufficient funding in budget to cover recruiting new staff. GW requested Board approval to begin the initial process. Figures could then be added into the budget and reported to the next meeting on 24 January. DA suggested recruiting after setting up the sub-groups to ensure correct people are recruited.

Board members agreed to get back to GW with details of their PR Agencies.

ALL

6. Structure of Meetings

DA explained that this had been covered whilst discussing sub groups 11

earlier in the meeting.

7. Any Other Business

PP informed the Board that there had been several meetings with Herefordshire with the possibility of a closer relationship between Worcestershire, Herefordshire and Marches LEPs as there is overlap, particularly with Herefordshire. PP requested guidance from the Board on how to pursue. A discussion took place and the general consensus was that Worcestershire LEP had a good future and would do better to continue to focus on delivery. The suggestion was to move forward with discussions with Geoffrey Davies from The Marches LEP, as this is an opportune time. Yet, any discussions lead by the Chair with neighbouring LEPs needed to focus on the ‘what’s in it for us’ question and the implications on funding and resources. The Board agreed that discussions should progress is a cautious manner.

Away Day

It was decided that the previous dates of 27/28 March were too close to Easter. Suggested dates of 8, 9 or 10 April were put forward as an alternative. A note will be sent to obtain availability prior to final date being agreed.

CR

Next LEP Board Meeting

24 January 2013 - 3.00pm to 5.00pm

LEP Offices, Brindley Court, Gresley Road, Warndon, Worcester, WR4 9FD

12

Action List from the Minutes

22 November 2013

1. Agreed that a structure diagram of the WLEP would be produced and circulated before the next Board meeting.

2. WLEP to input into the county boundary signs.

3. Make contact with PXP in relation to the Bromsgrove Technology Park

4. A summary of the LEP Business Plans would be presented at the next Board meeting.

5. AW to report back on the meeting with Herefordshire and the Enterprise Zone.

6. Growing Places and the extra allocation to WCCC.

7. RGF3 – GW to chase on the establishment of a working group.

8. Manufacturing Study tender brief to be written.

9. A ½ day session in order to implement the governance review and agree the structure of the LEP and its delivery mechanisms.

10. One page summary of the Tech – RGF Round Bid to be circulated in order to brief members.

11. Complete the Planning Charter and move towards producing the action plan. – CB

12. Core funding application to be complete by 15th February 2013.

13. Progression towards an action plan of the Regulatory Charter - CB

14. Armed Forces Covenant working group to explore the opportunities for Worcestershire Business.

15. Heseltine Review – WLEP to feed into the National LEP Networks feedback.

16. Review dates for the Away Day.

17. Arrange an Extraordinary Board Meeting before the next Board meeting in January.

9th January 2013

1. Appointments to the Finance, Audit and Appointments Committee from the Public Sector to be raised at the LEP Liaison Group.

2. Board Papers to be structured in the new format.

3. All members of the Board to provide PR agencies and contacts.

4. Away Day dates – CR to finalise organisation.

5. PP to approach Marches LEP chair about joint working.

13

ITEM 4: LEP CYBER STRATEGY

WLEP BOARD RECOMMENDATION

The LEP Board is recommended to approve a) the Worcestershire Cyber Security Strategy b) support the ERDF Bid which is currently being developed to deliver elements of the

strategy for an appropriate figure of £40,000 over 3 yearsc) to consider launching the strategy in Westminster, working with our local MPs

1.0 Context1.1 Within the WLEP Business Plan we identified key sectors, this included Cyber Security & Defence.

Worcestershire is the home to QinetiQ in Malvern and the Malvern Hills Science Park which hasGiven birth to a number of spin out companies. This vital and emerging Cyber Security sector, has growth potential to embed itself across the county.

1.2 This sector has the ability to harness growth across boundaries into neighbouring LEPs, especially The Marches, with its military history and its current focus on the Hereford Enterprise Zone, and also Gloucestershire with GCHQ.

2.0 Proposal2.1 Worcestershire has a cluster of small, innovative cyber security companies that have developed in

the area through a combination of skills and customer location. This cluster, known as the Malvern Cyber Security Cluster, is widely seen as the most developed , organised and active cyber security cluster in the country and has already started to make a name for the region in the area of cyber security.

2.2 The combination of a cluster of cyber security SMEs, growth in the market and a concerted central Government agenda to grow this area represents a unique opportunity for the Worcestershire region. In order for a successful cluster of companies to thrive, The Worcestershire LEP recognises a number of factors that need to be in place. These are skills development, suitable infrastructure and customer engagement.

2.3 In parallel to the investment in cyber security activity in Worcestershire, it is important that news of this is widely publicised both nationally and internationally. This will allow Worcestershire’s success in this area to attract further growth. The Worcestershire LEP will maintain a robust marketing activity in parallel to the other projects detailed within this strategy.

2.4 More than 45 organisations have worked together with the Worcestershire LEP to develop this strategy. Barriers to growth and also opportunities to enhance companies’ success have been identified with associated recommended action points:

2.4.1 Skills

Action 1: Set up a Continuous Professional Development Cyber Security Training Centre in MalvernAction 2: Work with e-skills to ensure that Worcestershire is used as a National pilot for crucial skills development and schools outreach.

14

2.4.2 Finance

Action 3: Work with banks and other financial institutions to encourage lending. Action 4: Run an education awareness programme for SMEs about equity investment and its associated benefits to the founders.

2.4.3 Growing SMEs

Action 5: Set up a not-for-profit consortium to enable SMEs to bid into Government and EU contracts.

2.4.4 Infrastructure

Action 6: Worcestershire LEP to provide a vehicle for cyber security SMEs to receive Government grantsAction 7: Ensure that investment in broadband is focused in areas of high need.Action 8: Examine the provision of affordable housing in the county and transport links between Worcester and Malvern. Develop and produce marketing material about the benefits to young people of living in the county.

2.4.5 Innovation and Start-ups

Action 9: Develop a strategy and investment plan to support and encourage start-ups in the cyber security market.

2.4.6 Securing Worcestershire

Action 10: Work with industry to identify a recognised cyber security standard suitable for SMEs and then provide financial assistance to roll this out across SMEs in the region.Action 11: Set up a cyber security group for schools and colleges to share best practice about protecting the school networks against both internal and external attacks. Action 12: Run regular awareness seminars in collaboration with Get Safe Online.Attracting New CompaniesAction 13: Attract a major cyber security company to the region.

2.4.7 Publicity

Action 14: Develop a wide-ranging and innovative publicity plan to run for the next two years.

3.0 Delivery/Actions3.1 At short notice a call for projects under ERDF Priority 2 Stimulating Enterprise Development was

made in November 2012. A small Working Group including Emma Philpott – Key IQ, Steve Borwell-Fox – borwell Ltd, Steve Brain – Worcestershire County Council, Alan White – Malvern Hills Science Park, Simon Smith – Malvern Hills DC put together a proposal which was submitted and gained an invitation to develop this into a full application. The deadline for this is Thursday, 28 February 2013. The bid promoted the following activity:

a) develop and support a Cyber Security Group in Worcestershireb) use of the cyber ‘dirty’ lab/Evaluation Centrec) support local SMEs to stay safe on lined) a cyber health check providing 3 days support for the SMEs in Worcestershiree) a grant programme to provide SMEs in the cyber security sector with a revenue or capital grant

to expand their business.

15

3.2 In order to create the match for this bid Worcestershire County Council will provide £116,900, private sector will provide £125,000, and the Worcestershire LEP are asked to contribute £40,000 over the next 3 years. The total amount bid for is £281,000, giving a total project cost of £563,800.

4.0 Partners and Engagement4.1 Steve Borwell-Fox (Business Board Member) is the cyber security champion for Worcestershire.

Partners to this work include Worcestershire County Council, Malvern Hills Science Park, Malvern Hills District Council, Malvern Hills Cyber Security Cluster and Malvern Hills Cyber Security Network.

A copy of the Strategy is enclosed with the Board Papers.

16

ITEM 5: MANUFACTURING STUDY

WLEP BOARD RECOMMENDATIONa) The LEP Board is recommended to approve the proposed manufacturing sector

survey in the LEP area. b) A small working group led by Carl Arntzen which will guide the process as the Board

representative.

1.0 Context1.1 The LEP Business Plan makes a commitment to primarily focus on key sectors in order to drive

forward economic growth and enhance Worcestershire’s competitive edge and one of these strategic priorities is the manufacturing sector.

1.2 In the West Midlands and in Worcestershire, there is a longstanding and diverse manufacturing base, and it remains an important sector for the Worcestershire economy given the successful and established brands and manufacturers located in the county. Companies such as Yamazaki Mazak, Worcester Bosch, Morgan Motor Cars, Harris Brush, Brinton Carpets, Kanes Foods, Thorlux Lighting, GKN and Morgan Ceramics benefit from a skilled workforce, excellent communication links and have made a positive decision to locate and remain in Worcestershire.

1.3 Worcestershire’s manufacturing sector still plays a key role in terms of employment and wealth generation, and there are approximately 1650 manufacturing companies in the LEP. Businesses have links to the supply chains of the automotive and aerospace sectors. This is complemented by the food and drink sector and the agriculture sector which processes and distributes from the county. It is therefore essential that sector supply chain connections in surrounding LEP areas are also understood.

2.0 Proposal2.1 The LEP is keen to understand what is needed in order to release the economic and employment

growth potential of this important sector. The LEP proposes to commission suitably qualified consultants to undertake a study with manufacturers which will:

identify and categorise the manufacturing businesses in the area quantify the growth potential of those businesses identify any barriers to growth determine any support needs make recommendations for future actions that should be taken by the LEP to support

manufacturers in Worcestershire

2.2 This work will build upon and assess our manufacturing sector links to:

automotive supply chain which links to Jaguar LandRover and other first tier suppliers links to traditional sectors in the county such as carpet making, food and drink numbers of businesses within the key sectors identified in the Government’s industrial

strategy number of businesses in the knowledge intensive sectors and undertaking research and

development

17

3.0 Delivery/Actions3.1 The consultancy brief for this work will be tendered through the standard LEP process. It will be

advertised in finditinworcestershire. The proposed timetable is as follows:

Dates Actions28 January 2013 Consultancy Brief advertised

8 February Tender deadline

11 February Tenders assessed – Long List

14 February Interviews – Short List Tenders

18 February LEP & Successful Tenderer – Kick Off Meeting

15 April Draft Report submitted for consideration

30 April Final report submitted

3.2 The indicative budget for this research is £14,000 - £18,000 (inclusive of expenses) excluding VAT.

4.0 Partners and Engagement4.1 The LEP Executive will oversee the LEP procurement process and, as is usual practice, will identify

panel members to sift through the long and short list of tenders and make a selection. It is suggested that Carl Arntzen leads a sub group of the Board to guide this process.

Contact

Gary Woodman, LEP Executive 01905 346180

18

ITEM 6: WLEPS’ BUSINESS PLAN

WLEP BOARD RECOMMENDATION

The LEP Board will have a working session on the detail and delivery of the Strategic Objective 1 – National Profile and Promotion. We suggest all Board members read pages 10 and 11 of the Business Plan.

1.0 Context1.1 Following the launch of the business plan on 9th November 2012 each strategic objective has an

outline business plan. Some of these areas are well developed and its established the course of actions and delivery projects and partners that are required to achieve these stated aims.

1.2 The less developed of these areas is the strategic objective related to National Profile and Promotion. There is a clear need to co-ordinate and promote the county together as a partnership with the aim of raising the profile of the County as a business destination on a national stage.

1.3 Employers have recognised the strategic opportunities which are available to businesses by promoting the County and through generating value of the overall county brand. Building a coherent narrative and developing a core range of messages and inventions have been identified as critical to moving Worcestershire forward on to a national stage.

2.0 Proposal2.1 We will look to harness the collective strengths, resources and energies of the wider partnership

and to develop a coherent case for generating new business opportunities attracting investment from the private and public sector.

2.2 The Strategy focuses on three core areas:

Showcase Worcestershire – maximise the County’s exposure at key business and commercial events to raise our profile on a national stage and to highlight what we do best.

Promote Worcestershire – utilise our networks and relationships to increase the visibility of Worcestershire to generate new opportunities in established and emerging markets.

Position Worcestershire – increase Worcestershire’s presence and relevance in key decision making to deliver better solutions for the County’s businesses and economy.

3.0 Delivery/Actions3.1 To have a working session which bring together a more detailed action plan and way forward. `

4.0 Partners and Engagement4.1 A number of partners have a role to play in this area – including Destination Worcestershire,

Worcestershire Ambassadors, Local Government tourism and marketing teams, MPs, UKTI, Alumni Societies and private sector businesses.

4.2 Private sector PR agencies and businesses can help support the positive messages of Worcestershire. WLEP needs to provide the tools for private sector businesses to promote and profile the county.

19

ITEM 7: LEP FUNDING AND ACCOUNTS

To follow

20

ITEM 8: CHAIR’S REPORT

WLEP BOARD RECOMMENDATIONThe following diary of events is presented to the Board in order to inform Members on the purpose and wide range of more significant meetings and discussions with partners and others. The Chair will provide further verbal explanation if required at the Meeting. The Board is asked to note the events and to seek clarification where required.

November

22nd Bromsgrove meeting Roger Hollingworth Regular review meeting to report (Leader) and Kevin Dicks (CEO) on LEP progress and to understand Inc GW BDC priorities and issues.

23rd Worcester meeting Charlie Little (WRFC MD) To discuss opportunities for Sixwaysand Jim Johnstone (Sports Events to become a key training base for anConsultant) overseas team during the 2015 Rugby

World Cup in England. Japan andArgentina are key targets with linksto associated business opportunities.

28th LEP Office PP and GW meeting with ASAP To discuss progress and to identify (PR Consultants) future opportunities for PR coverage

December

3rd Pershore meeting Jack Hegarty (CEO) and Regular review meeting to report onPhil Merrick (Dir. Econ. Devt) LEP progress and to understand

WDC priorities and issues.

5th/6th Westminster National Infrastructure Conference Presented paper on Worcestershire’sHeld at Institution of Civil Engineers forward planning of all infrastructure,

largely supported by WCC team, and on LEP strategies and progress to Implement key elements soonest.

14th Worcester Worcester Tech Park Board Meeting to discuss progress and issues for Plan B, without Worcester Bosch, asRevised submission to BIS for RGF.

20th Worcester meeting Charlie Little (WRFC) and To develop further the potential forMarcus Burton (MD Mazak) engaging Japanese businesses in the

bid to attract the Japanese team tobase themselves in Worcester.

20th LEP Office PP and GW meeting with Reddenhill To hear of Reddenhill’s offer inConsulting, together with FSB. respect to training and development.

20th LEP Office PP and GW meeting with new To discuss future modus operandii Business Board Chair and Deputy. and sub group structures.

21

January 2013

8th Hereford PP and GW meeting with Jeff To discuss cross border common Hughes (HC Dir. Econ. Devt.) interests and co-operation.and Mark Pearce (MD Rotherwas EZ)

9th LEP Office LEP Board Meeting Special Board to discuss Governanceand structural issues.

14th Worcester Meeting Peter Blake (Head of To discuss Pinch Point Programme,Highways, WCC) signage and other matters.

17th Worcester Worcester Tech Park Board Meeting To discuss responses from BIS and progress on Plan B together withneed for Plan C

Peter Pawsey17th January 2013

22

Item 9: Executive Director’s Report

WLEP BOARD RECOMMENDATION

The LEP Board notes this report for information.

Approve the Budget for the Away day.

1.0 Autumn Statement1.1 On the 5th December 2012 the Chancellor of the Exchequer presented the Autumn Statement a

number of announcements had implications on the WLEP.

- LEPs to be given a role setting skills strategies consistent with national objectives.

- Chartered status for FE colleges will be linked to having taken account of local skills priorities;

- Government will encourage LEPs to have a seat on FE colleges’ governing bodies, with colleges represented on LEPs’ boards;

- The Government intends to devolve a greater proportion of growth-related spending on the basis of strategic plans developed by Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEPs) by creating a single funding pot for local areas from April 2015 (as per the Review).

- This is likely to include some of the funding for local transport, housing, schemes to get people back into work, skills and any additional local growth funding. Further details will be set out in the Spending Review.

1.2 In relation to the Heseltine Review Government’s full response to Review released in Spring 2013;

- LEPs to lead development of new strategic plans for local growth consistent with national priorities, consulting all local partners including local Chambers;

- Government will provide £10m a year for capacity building within LEPs (each LEP to apply for up to £250k additional funding per year);

- Government will align priorities for EU Common Strategic Framework funds in England, based on LEP plans

- Government will make available a new concessionary public works loan rate to an infrastructure project nominated by each LEP (excluding London).

2.0 Away Day2.1 The Board, Business Board and Key Partners meet to discuss the progress of the LEP in

accordance with the process of the Performance Framework in the Business Plan. This session also gains input into the delivery plans of the LEP and future ideas and opportunities.

2.2 The date for the Away Day has been set at 10th April. The executive will put a proposal to the Executive of the Board to develop a structure for the day.

2.3 The Board are asked to approve a budget of £4000 to deliver the away day.

23

ITEM 10: NATIONAL LEPS’ BUSINESS PLAN STATUS

WLEP BOARD RECOMMENDATIONThe LEP Board is recommended to note the table summary of the status of each LEP’s Business Plans or Economic Strategy.

Summary of LEPs’ Business Plan Status

No. LEP Business Plan Status1 North Eastern Long Term Independent Economic Review underway;

Recommendations to NE LEP, LEP Partners and Government due Spring 2013 to frame respective actions

2 Cumbria LEP Submission Document 2010

3 Tees Valley Business Plan Revised 2012

4 York, North Yorkshire & East Riding

LEP Submission Document 2010

5 Lancashire Independent Economic Review 2011 frames Delivery Priorities

6 Leeds City Region Business Plan 2011

7 Liverpool City Region Economic Strategy 2011

8 Greater Manchester Independent Economic Review shaping Strategy 2010

9 Humber Business Plan 2012

10 Sheffield City Region LEP Submission Document 2010; Economic Assessment

11 Cheshire and Warrington Business Plan 2012

12 Derby, Derbyshire, Nottinghamand Nottinghamshire

Economic Strategy Research 2011

13 Greater Lincolnshire Business Plan 2012

14 Stoke on Trent & Staffordshire

Business Plan 2012

15 Leicester & Leicestershire Economic Growth Plan 2012

16 The Marches Draft Business Plan prepared; Spring 2013 publications

17 Black Country BC Consortium 30 Year Vision (2000); Annual Reports

18 Greater Birmingham & Solihull

Economic White Paper Consultation 2012; Final Strategy due February 2013

19 Northamptonshire Business Plan 2012

20 Greater Cambridge & Greater Peterborough

Business Plan 2011; Growth Prospectus Consultation 2012

21 New Anglia Business Plan 2011

22 Coventry & Warwickshire Business Plan 2011

23 Worcestershire Business Plan published 2012

24

24 South East Midlands Business Plan 2012

25 Gloucester & Gloucestershire

LEP Submission Document 2010, Action Plans and First Annual Report 2012

26 Hertfordshire Plan for Growth 2012

27 Buckinghamshire Thames Valley

Plan for Sustainable Growth 2012

28 Oxfordshire LEP Submission Document 2010; LEP programmes

29 London Future of London Economy Debate 2012 – 2062 (as part of wider themed Future of London debates in 2012)

30 Thames Valley Berkshire LEP Submission Document 2010

31 West of England Business Plan 2011

32 Swindon and Wiltshire LEP Submission Document 2010

33 Enterprise M3 Business Plan 2012

34 South East 20 Year Vision Statement 2011

35 Coast to Capital Strategy for Growth 2011; Annual Report 2012

36 Solent LEP Submission Document 2010

37 Dorset Dorset Framework 2012 (Business Plan to follow 2013)

38 Heart of the South West Business Plan 2011

39 Cornwall & Isles of Scilly Economic Growth Strategy 2012

Contact Claire Bridges, WLEP Executive 01905 346180

25