water re-use: no silver bullets
TRANSCRIPT
Water Re-Use: No Silver Bullets
No single technology fits every situation
Variables include:
– Location
– Water discharge regulations
• Surface discharge
• Storage in above ground structure
• In ground pits
– Quality of influent water
– Desired quality of effluent water
– Disposal costs
– Re-Use options
– Transportation
1
Water Treatment Technologies
TSS/Selected TDS Removal
– Systems remove suspended solids and some dissolved solids depending on process used.
– Most are very mobile and can be re-located and set up in short amount of time.
– Does not remove salt from water.
– Most are capable of processing high volumes
– Limited waste streams of solids and liquids
– Examples are Electro-Coagulation, Nano-Filtration, Ultra-Filtration, or Clarifier
2
Water Treatment Technologies
Reverse Osmosis
– Mobile treatment for salt removal from wastewater
– More economic than evaporative system
– Limited by TDS level of 50,000 ppm
– Quality pre-treatment necessary
– Recovery of “fresh-water” based on TDS of influent water
– Three Products Produced
• Fresh-water
• Concentrated brine
• Solids
3
Water Treatment Technologies
Thermal/Evaporative Technologies
– Typically less mobile for same output as reverse osmosis system
– More costly than a reverse osmosis system
– Highest efficiency of freshwater recovery from wastewater
– Efficiency based on influent TDS
– Many can use waste heat to lessen energy costs
– Three products generated
• Fresh-water
• Concentrated brine
• Solids
– Examples
• Evaporators
• Mechanical Vapor Recompression
• Crystallizers 4
(Poor) Reclaimed Oilfield Waste Water Quality (High)
No Treatment
Course Filtration w/ Dilution
Chemical Treatment & Separation
RO / FO / Evaporation
(Low) Reclaimed Wastewater Treatment cost (High)
( (High) Down-hole Quality Risks (reuse) / Environmental Risks(discharge) (Low))
High Scale, High Bacteria,
High Suspended Solids, High TDS
Ultra-Low Scale, No Bacteria,
No Suspended Solids Low TDS
Water Treatment Optimization
Water Quality Specifications
Analyte Units Limits
Total Suspended Solids mg/L 30
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 50,000
Sulfate mg/L 1,000
Stron=um mg/L 100
Silica Gel Treated HEM (TPH as HEM)
mg/L ND
Oil & Grease HEM mg/L ND
Magnesium mg/L 100
Iron mg/L 25
Chloride mg/L 30,000
Carbonate as CaCO3 mg/L ND
Calcium mg/L 1,000
Boron mg/L 10
Barium mg/L 100 6
-Example
How much Water can be Re-Used?
Factors to Consider:
– Influent water quality
– Effluent stream desired (Ex: fresh-water, clean brine, etc.)
– Purpose of re-use
• Hydraulic fracturing
– Type of frac (Ex: slick-water, gel fracs etc.)
• Drilling
– Volume of water available
• Flow-back
• Produced water
– Chemical costs associated with quality of water
• Bio-cide
• Scale inhibitor
• Friction reducer 7
Planning for Re-Use
Centralized vs. Mobile
– How much water do I have in one area?
– How long will the facility be in one place?
Transportation - Trucking vs. Piping
– Distance water will be moved
– Costs associated with each
– Quality & size of pipe needed
Available Space for Equipment
– Terrain
– Size of location
Re-usable Water Recovered
– Quality of water needed
– Will this water be blended with other water sources?
8
Planning for Re-Use
Storage – Frac tanks
– In-ground ponds
– Above ground containments
Disposal Options – Solids
– Concentrated brine
– Sludge
Cost – Processing
– Mobilization/De-Mobilization
– Site construction
– Maintenance 9
Planning for Re-Use
Regulations/Restrictions in Area of Operation
– Can I surface discharge water?
– Are there disposal wells in operation?
– What are pond storage guidelines?
– Can the water be sold for other uses?
Land-Owners
– Acquiring land
– Additional activity expected
Commercial vs. Private
– Is the facility open to the public?
– Tracking incoming water tickets and reporting
10
Why Recycle?
Less Impact on Surface/Groundwater Resources
– Fewer water wells and costs associated with operating/maintaining
• Costs of new wells ranges from $30K-$225K/well
• Rate of water wells decreases over time
– Savings of paying landowners/municipalities for accessing water
Self-Reliance of a Known Resource
– Water recovery from oil/gas wells
– Less disposal = fewer SWD’s
Less Time to Fill Ponds for Future Operations
– More wells can be drilled/completed in shorter time due to water availability
Influence Future Regulations/Permitting Procedures
Positive Perception by the Public
It’s The Right Thing To Do
11
Water Recycling Conclusions
Most of the technologies are already proven
Transportation and storage logistics are critical
Varying levels of water treatment impact cost
Texas operations have low cost water sourcing options and low cost produced water disposal options
Recycling is more of an economic challenge than a technical challenge
New technologies are being developed that should help to lower cost of recycling while providing a quality water to store, transport and use in future operations.
12
Water Treatment
QUESTIONS?
13