watershed-based planning a blueprint for action!
TRANSCRIPT
Watershed-Based Planning
A Blueprint for Action!
Statutory and regulatory context
• Clean Water Act– Water quality standards– KPDES discharge permits– Stream & wetland “filling”
• Safe Drinking Water Act– Source water protection
• Public health codes– Residential wastewater
• Local Codes– Planning/zoning, subdivision, etc.
Source Water Protection Map for Slate Creek (Montgomery County)
Clean Water
Act
United States Code, Title 33 Sec. 1251. Congressional declaration of goals and policy
(a) Restoration and maintenance of chemical, physical and biological integrity of Nation's waters; national goals for achievement of objective
The objective of this chapter is to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation's waters. In order to achieve this objective it is hereby declared that, consistent with the provisions of this chapter -
o (1) it is the national goal that the discharge of pollutants into the navigable waters be eliminated by 1985;
o (2) it is the national goal that wherever attainable, an interim goal of water quality which provides for the protection and propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife and provides for recreation in and on the water be achieved by July 1, 1983;
o (3) it is the national policy that the discharge of toxic pollutants in toxic amounts be prohibited;
o (4) it is the national policy that Federal financial assistance be provided to construct publicly owned waste treatment works;
o (5) it is the national policy that areawide waste treatment management planning processes be developed and implemented to assure adequate control of sources of pollutants in each State;
o (6) it is the national policy that a major research and demonstration effort be made to develop technology necessary to eliminate the discharge of pollutants into the navigable waters, waters of the contiguous zone, and the oceans; and
o (7) it is the national policy that programs for the control of nonpoint sources of pollution be developed and implemented in an expeditious manner so as to enable the goals of this chapter to be met through the control of both point and nonpoint sources of pollution.
United States Code, Title 33 Sec. 1251. Congressional declaration of goals and policy
(a) Restoration and maintenance of chemical, physical and biological integrity of Nation's waters; national goals for achievement of objective
The objective of this chapter is to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation's waters. In order to achieve this objective it is hereby declared that, consistent with the provisions of this chapter -
o (1) it is the national goal that the discharge of pollutants into the navigable waters be eliminated by 1985;
o (2) it is the national goal that wherever attainable, an interim goal of water quality which provides for the protection and propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife and provides for recreation in and on the water be achieved by July 1, 1983;
o (3) it is the national policy that the discharge of toxic pollutants in toxic amounts be prohibited;
o (4) it is the national policy that Federal financial assistance be provided to construct publicly owned waste treatment works;
o (5) it is the national policy that areawide waste treatment management planning processes be developed and implemented to assure adequate control of sources of pollutants in each State;
o (6) it is the national policy that a major research and demonstration effort be made to develop technology necessary to eliminate the discharge of pollutants into the navigable waters, waters of the contiguous zone, and the oceans; and
o (7) it is the national policy that programs for the control of nonpoint sources of pollution be developed and implemented in an expeditious manner so as to enable the goals of this chapter to be met through the control of both point and nonpoint sources of pollution.
Clean Water Act Part I:Technology Based
• Focus on point source (PS) discharges to surface waters, through NPDES permitting
• Limits apply regardless of condition of receiving water, or relative contribution from the source
• Pollutant levels in discharges determined by technical/economic feasibility
• Same limits placed on all PS within each industrial grouping (50 categories/plus subcategories) – Generally, municipal sewage plants must achieve discharge
equal to “secondary treatment”
Cost-Effectiveness AnalysisC
OS
T (
$)
POLLUTANT REMOVAL (%)
Technology-BasedTreatment Level
100%
KPDES Permitting under Sec. 402
• Illegal for point source (pipe, ditch, channel, tunnel, vessel, rolling stock, or other manmade conveyance) to discharge pollutants to surface waters without a permit
• Permit is a license granting permission to discharge– Not a right: permit is revocable “for cause” (eg, non-compliance)
– No guarantee against more stringent future requirements
Covers WWTPs and other point sources
KPDES Program: Coverage• Industrial and municipal
wastewater• Industrial, urban, and
construction-related storm water runoff
• Concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs)
• Active, inactive, and some abandoned mines
• Discharges from RCRA remedial action activity meeting point source definition
KPDES stormwater covers:
• Construction sites with a disturbed area of one acre or more– General permit, BMP plan, inspections
required• Some cities with municipally-owned
separate storm sewer systems– 10,000 population or more– Must develop program with public education
& involvement, construction site controls, post-construction stormwater management, pollution prevention, illicit discharge detection and elimination.
DirectIndirect POTW
Industry
Industry
Direct and Indirect Discharges
KPDES Permits
• Individual permits– All point sources not covered by general
permits must obtain (no de minimis exemption)
– Required to submit detailed permit application form, including data on actual/expected levels of pollutants in discharge
• General permits (many sources)– Usually similar sources– Usually same requirements for all – Minimal reporting– Notice of intent vs. passive coverage
KPDES Permits: Elements
• Effluent limits– Limits must ensure meeting WQS– Maximum daily and monthly average limits
required for most– POTWs have weekly average instead of daily
maximum– Expressed as mass–directly/indirectly
• Best management practices– Production process modifications– Operational changes– Materials substitution– Materials and/or water conservation
• Compliance schedule (shouldn’t extend beyond 5-year permit term
KPDES Permits: Elements (cont.)
• Monitoring requirements– Self-monitoring by permittee– Traditionally effluents only, increasingly ambient, too– Specifies parameters and tests– Specifies frequency
• Reporting requirements– Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) sent to the
permitting agency• Often monthly but sometimes
less frequently• Reopener provisions• For POTWs only: Pretreatment program
and sludge management requirements
Technology-Based Requirements for Municipal Discharges: Secondary Treatment
30-Day Average 7-Day Average 5-Day BOD 30 mg/L 45 mg/L TSS 30mg/L 45 mg/L pH 6-9 -- Removal 85% of BOD5
and TSS --
Clean Water Act Part II:Water Quality Standards
•What are you using it for?
•What criteria support that use?
•How will you keep it from degrading?
Water Quality Standards
• State’s yardstick to measure health of waters
• Three key elements of WQSs:– Designated uses– Water quality criteria– Antidegradation provisions
Kentucky Use Designations
• Aquatic life support – warmwater & coldwater aquatic habitat
• Primary contact recreation – swimming
• Secondary contact recreation – boating and fishing
• Fish consumption – eating fish• Drinking water – domestic
water supply
WQS: Water Quality Criteria (WQC)
• Consistent scientifically with protecting all designated uses (DUs)
• Basic types of criteria– Narrative/numeric– Water column/sediment/ fish tissue
• Categories of criteria– Aquatic life
• Pollutant-specific/aquatic community indices– Human health (drinking/fish consumption)– Wildlife (semiaquatic/food chain effects)
WQS: Narrative Criteria• Waters must be "free from"
– Putrescent or otherwise objectionable bottom deposits
– Oil, scum, and floating debris in amounts that are unsightly
– Nuisance levels of odor, color, or other conditions
– Undesirable or nuisance aquatic life
– Substances in amounts toxic to humans or aquatic life
Usually apply to all waters, regardless of
use designation
WQS: Numeric Criteria
• Parameter-specific: DO, temp., turbidity, N, P, Cu, dioxin, etc.
– Level/concentration: 1 mg/L, 5 mg/kg
– Duration:•Acute: instantaneous, 1-
hour, 1-day•Chronic: 4-day, 7-day, 30-
day
– Recurrence interval: 1 year, 3 years
Parameter Value Units
Dissolved Oxygen >5.0 milligrams/liter
pH 6-9 Standard Units
Un-ionized Amonia-N
<0.05 mg/l
Fecal Coliform <400 Colonies/100ml
Temp <25 Degrees C
Kentucky warmwater aquatic habitat numeric criteria
MINIMUM DATASET FOR FRESHWATER WATER QUALITY CRITERIA DERIVATION
SALMONID SECONDFISHFAMILY
CHORDATA
PLANKTONICCRUSTACEAN
BENTHIC CRUSTACEAN
INSECT ROTIFERA, ANNELIDA, MOLLUSCA
OTHER INSECT OR MOLLUSCA
DATA FROM THE MOST SENSITIVE LIFE STAGES SHOULD BE USED
Most Sensitive
Egg
Larva
Adult
Acute Toxicity Data
96-hour LC50
Concentration:0.0 μg/L 25 μg/L 50 μg/L 100 μg/L 200 μg/L 500 μg/L
96-hr LC50 = 100 μg/L
Control 1 2 3 4 5
Biological criteria
Good Mid-Range Poor
WQS: Biological Criteria
• Applicable to aquatic life, not human health• Require field sampling and studies• Fish, macroinvertebrates, plants, etc.
– Number of individuals, species, categories– Mass of species, feeding guilds, trophic
levels– Specialists verses generalists– Tolerant verses intolerant
• Compare conditions at “study site” with relatively unimpacted “reference site”
WQS: antidegradation provisions
• Purpose: Prevent deterioration of existing levels of good water quality
• Generally applies parameter-by-parameter, not waterbody-by-waterbody
• Three tiers of protection– Tiers 1 and 2 apply to all waters with some
features at or better than WQS– Tier 3 applies only to specially classified
waters
Tier 1: the “absolute floor”
• Cannot allow loss of any “existing” use
• Cannot allow water quality to drop below levels needed to maintain existing use
• Applies to all waters, regardless of use designation
Tier 2: use of available assimilative capacity not a right
• “Brakes” slide from really good WQ to barely at WQS by saying can’t degrade WQ unless:– Allowing lower WQ is “necessary to accommodate
important economic or social development”– Point sources are meeting relevant technology-
based limits– Have “achieved all cost-effective and reasonable
best management practices for nonpoint sources” – Go through public review and comment process
Tier 3: outstanding waters protected
• Applies only to waters classified as Outstanding National Resource Waters (ONRW)– This classification “overlays” designated uses– Candidates include, but are not limited to,
“waters of National and State parks and wildlife refuges and waters of exceptional recreational or ecological significance”
• Only minimal, or significant but short-term, decreases in WQ are allowed
303(d) process: establishing TMDLs
A TMDL is. . . . • A strategy for achieving WQS • Based on the relationship between pollutant
sources and the condition of a water body• The amount of a specific pollutant that a
waterbody can receive and still meet WQS• Describes an allowable load and allocates it
among point sources and nonpoint sources (plus a margin of error).
TMDL = ΣWLAi + ΣLAi + MOS
TMDL process requirements
• Include public in the process!• Submit final TMDL, with loading
allocations and supporting information, to USEPA
• Review conducted by USEPA– If approved, begin implementation– If not approved, USEPA develops
TMDL and finalizes within 30 days
• Provide “reasonable assurance” load reductions can be achieved
Leading causes & sources of impairment [2004 305(b) Report]
• Causes– Siltation (sediment)– Pathogens (bacteria)– Other habitat alterations– PCBs– Organic enrichment / low DO
• Sources– Unknown– Agriculture– Habitat modification– Resource extraction– Urban runoff / storm sewers