webster groves school district elementary …...givens elementary and balance utilization among all...
TRANSCRIPT
WEBSTER GROVES SCHOOL DISTRICT
ELEMENTARY ATTENDANCE BOUNDARY RECOMMENDATIONS
FEBRUARY 2020
WEBSTER GROVES SCHOOL DISTRICTELEMENTARY REDISTRICTING
2WEBSTER GROVES SCHOOL DISTRICT
► E L E M E N T A R Y R E D I S T R I C T I N GT H E P R O C E S S
Plan for
Planning
Data Analysis and Review
Options
Development
Community Feedback
Board Presentation
Advisory
Committee
3WEBSTER GROVES SCHOOL DISTRICT
► E L E M E N T A R Y R E D I S T R I C T I N GT I M E L I N E
Boundary Advisory Committee
• Representation from:
– Parents associated with each building
– 3 members selected by the BOE that do not and will not have children in elementary school.
– 1 BOE member
• Tasked with developing options, processing community feedback, and
making recommendations to the Administration and BOE.
• The final recommendation will need to be approved by the BOE.
Focus Groups
• 15 Focus Group sessions were held during the week of Dec. 9.
– More than 100 people participated.
• 2 additional focus group meetings were held on Jan. 6 at Givens
Elementary with around 15 participants.
• Many of the committee members observed focus group meetings and
the feedback was considered as the committee refined and developed
options.
BACKGROUND DATAELEMENTARY REDISTRICTING
7WEBSTER GROVES SCHOOL DISTRICT
► B A C K G R O U N D D A T A
Hudson ES
Givens ES Avery ES
Bristol ES WGHS
Hixson MS
Clark ES
Edgar Road ES
Current BoundaryCapacity
(No Modulars)
Attend
Count
Attend
Free/Reduced
Lunch %
Attend
Utilization
Attend
from Out
of District
Avery Elementary School 452 491 14% 109% 10
Bristol Elementary School 433 472 7% 109% 16
Clark Elementary School 301 335 7% 111% 4
Edgar Road Elementary School 351 427 13% 122% 8
Hudson Elementary School 245 206 15% 84% 12
Givens Elementary School 132 118 19% 89% 16
ELEMENTARY SUBTOTAL 1,914 2,049 11% 107% 66
Steger 6th Grade School 330 317 13% 96% 8
6TH SUBTOTAL 330 317 13% 96% 8
Hixson Middle School 700 744 14% 106% 48
MIDDLE SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 700 744 14% 106% 48
Webster Groves High School 1600 1,410 16% 88% 92
HIGH SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 1,600 1,410 16% 88% 92
TOTAL 4,544 4,520 14% 99% 214
Current BoundaryCapacity
(No Modulars)
Live-In
Count
Live-In
Free/Reduced
Lunch %
Live-In
Utilization
Avery Elementary School 452 500 13% 111%
Bristol Elementary School 433 490 9% 113%
Clark Elementary School 301 350 7% 116%
Edgar Road Elementary School 351 447 12% 127%
Hudson Elementary School 245 196 10% 80%
Givens Elementary School 132 - - -
ELEMENTARY SUBTOTAL 1,914 1,983 10% 104%
Steger 6th Grade School 330 309 11% 94%
6TH SUBTOTAL 330 309 11% 94%
Hixson Middle School 700 696 12% 99%
MIDDLE SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 700 696 12% 99%
Webster Groves High School 1600 1,318 13% 82%
HIGH SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 1,600 1,318 13% 82%
TOTAL 4,544 4,306 12% 95%
8WEBSTER GROVES SCHOOL DISTRICT
► B A C K G R O U N D D A T AD E N S I T Y M A P S
A L L S T U D E N T S S T U D E N T S C U R R E N T L Y R E C E I V I N G F R E E / R E D U C E D M E A L S
Hudson ES
Givens ES Avery ES
Bristol ES WGHS
Hixson MS
Clark ES
Edgar Road ES
Hudson ES
Givens ES Avery ES
Bristol ES WGHS
Hixson MS
Clark ES
Edgar Road ES
9WEBSTER GROVES SCHOOL DISTRICT
► B A C K G R O U N D D A T AB L O C K G R O U P M A P S
P E R C A P I T A I N C O M E A V E R A G E D I S P O S A B L E I N C O M E
Source: ESRI BIS-US Census estimates, 2019
10WEBSTER GROVES SCHOOL DISTRICT
► B A C K G R O U N D D A T AC L O S E S T S C H O O L
A N A L Y S I S
Hudson ES
Givens ES Avery ES
Bristol ESWGHS
Hixson MS
Clark ES
Edgar Road ES
Current Boundary Capacity (No Modulars)
Live-In
Count
Free/Reduced
Lunch %Utilization
Avery Elementary School 452 549 9% 121%
Bristol Elementary School 433 360 4% 83%
Clark Elementary School 301 304 5% 101%
Edgar Road Elementary School 351 352 3% 100%
Hudson Elementary School 245 165 9% 67%
Givens Elementary School 414 253 39% 61%
TOTAL 2,196 1,983 10% 90%
OPTIONSELEMENTARY REDISTRICTING
Options
• Goal:
– The goal of this process is to establish a boundary for Givens Elementary
and balance utilization among all of the schools.
• Guidelines:
– Balance utilization (enrollment / capacity)
– Attempt to balance socio-economics
– Attempt to minimize distances traveled by students
Options
• These options were developed by the committee, consultants, and were informed by
focus group feedback. They are intended to generate feedback and conversations.
• There is no preferred option; the order in which they are presented has no bearing.
• The community will not be asked to “vote” on an option for the board to adopt, and
there will be multiple opportunities for the community to provide feedback.
• The committee may make adjustments based on community feedback before
making recommendations.
14
Scenario 1: Overview
Scenario 1: Description The intent of this scenario is to establish a boundary for Givens Elementary and balance utilization among all of the schools. This option also minimizes the distance that students will need to travel.
Benefits: • Fewest number of student traveling more than 1 mile• Contiguous attendance boundaries• Givens boundary encompasses majority of the North
Webster Area.
Challenges:• Largest disparity in socio-economics between the
schools.
Quick Metrics Current Scenario 1
Utilization Balance 80% - 127% 88% - 96%
Socio-Economic Balance 9%-13% 2% - 34%
Students Outside 1 Mile 564 377
Detached Boundaries 3 0
Legend
Current Boundary Outlines
Scenario Boundaries
Avery
Bristol
Clark
Edgar Road
Givens
Hudson
15
Scenario 1: Changes
To Givens from Bristol
To Givens from Bristol
To Givens from Clark To Givens from
Edgar Road
To Givens from Hudson
Current Boundaries with Scenario 1 changes Scenario 1 Boundaries
Legend
Current Boundary Outlines
Scenario Boundaries
Avery
Bristol
Clark
Edgar Road
Givens
Hudson
16
Scenario 1: Data
Avery Bristol Clark Edgar Road Hudson Givens
Avery 0 0 0 0 133
Bristol 0 0 0 0 157
Clark 0 49 0 39 16
Edgar Road 69 0 18 0 40
Hudson 0 0 0 0 17
538
FRO
M S
CH
OO
L:
TOTAL K-5 STUDENTS MOVED=
K-5 STUDENTS
MOVED
TO SCHOOL:
84%
37%
87%
43%
13%
93%
18%
4%
16%
7%
100%
11%
82%
5%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Avery
Bristol
Clark
Edgar Road
Hudson
Givens
Composition of Proposed Boundaries
Avery Bristol Clark Edgar Road Hudson
Enrollment, Capacity, Utilization Student Movement
Composition of Proposed Boundaries
All students enrolled in the 2020-21 school year, will have the choice to finish at that school, this table illustrates the “what-if scenario” for students moving to their newly assigned schools.
The chart below illustrates the composition of the scenario boundaries based on the current boundaries. For example, 84% of the students assigned to Avery reside within the current Avery boundary and 16% within the current Edgar Road boundary.
Quick Metrics Current Scenario 1
Utilization Balance 80% - 127% 88% - 96%
Socio-Economic Balance 9%-13% 2% - 34%
Students Outside 1 Mile 564 377
Detached Boundaries 3 0
Note: Capacity and utilization figures do NOT include any modular classrooms.
Avery 452 500 111% 64 13%
Bristol 433 490 113% 43 9%
Clark 301 350 116% 25 7%
Edgar Road 351 447 127% 54 12%
Hudson 245 196 80% 19 10%
Givens 414 - - - -
TOTAL 2,196 1,983 111% 205 10%
Avery 452 436 96% 27 6%
Bristol 433 382 88% < 15 <5%
Clark 301 264 88% 18 7%
Edgar Road 351 320 91% < 15 <5%
Hudson 245 218 89% 23 11%
Givens 414 363 88% 122 34%
TOTAL 2,196 1,983 90% 205 10%
School CapacityScenario
EnrollmentUtilization
Low SES
%
Low SES
Students
Low SES
Students
CURRENT BOUNDARIES
School CapacityLive-In
EnrollmentUtilization
Low SES
%
OPTION 1 BOUNDARIES
17
Scenario 2: Overview
Scenario 2: Description
The intent of this scenario is to establish a boundary for Givens Elementary and balance utilization among all of the schools. This scenario also minimizes the distance that students will need to travel but also considers balancing socio-economics.
Benefits: • 2nd fewest number of student travelling more than 1
mile• Contiguous attendance boundaries• Eliminates the need for any students to cross
Brentwood Blvd. • Givens Boundary encompasses majority of the North
Webster Area.
Challenges:• 2nd largest disparity in socio-economics between the
schools.
Quick Metrics Current Scenario 2
Utilization Balance 80% - 127% 87% - 96%
Socio-Economic Balance 9%-13% 4% -29%
Students Outside 1 Mile 564 449
Detached Boundaries 3 0
Legend
Current Boundary Outlines
Scenario Boundaries
Avery
Bristol
Clark
Edgar Road
Givens
Hudson
18
Scenario 2: Changes
Current Boundaries with Scenario 2 changes Scenario 2 Boundaries
To Givens from Bristol
To Givens from Bristol
To Givens from Edgar Road
From Edgar Rd to Bristol
To Givens from Hudson
To Givens from Avery
To Givens from Clark
Legend
Current Boundary Outlines
Scenario Boundaries
Avery
Bristol
Clark
Edgar Road
Givens
Hudson
To Givens from Clark
19
Scenario 2: Data
Enrollment, Capacity, Utilization Student Movement
Composition of Proposed Boundaries
All students enrolled in the 2020-21 school year, will have the choice to finish at that school, this table illustrates the “what-if scenario” for students moving to their newly assigned schools.
The chart below illustrates the composition of the scenario boundaries based on the current boundaries. For example, 82% of the students assigned to Hudson reside within the current Hudson boundary and 18% within the current Clark boundary.
Quick Metrics Current Scenario 2
Utilization Balance 80% - 127% 87% - 96%
Socio-Economic Balance 9%-13% 4% -29%
Students Outside 1 Mile 564 449
Detached Boundaries 3 0
Note: Capacity and utilization figures do NOT include any modular classrooms.
Avery Bristol Clark Edgar Road Hudson Givens
Avery 34 0 0 0 71
Bristol 0 0 0 0 214
Clark 0 0 0 39 43
Edgar Road 0 69 0 0 40
Hudson 0 0 0 0 17
527TOTAL K-5 STUDENTS MOVED=
K-5 STUDENTS
MOVED
TO SCHOOL:
FRO
M S
CH
OO
L:
100%
9%
18%
73%
56%
100%
18%
11%
18%
100%
10%
82%
4%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Avery
Bristol
Clark
Edgar Road
Hudson
Givens
Composition of Proposed Boundaries
Avery Bristol Clark Edgar Road Hudson
Avery 452 500 111% 64 13%
Bristol 433 490 113% 43 9%
Clark 301 350 116% 25 7%
Edgar Road 351 447 127% 54 12%
Hudson 245 196 80% 19 10%
Givens 414 - - - -
TOTAL 2,196 1,983 111% 205 10%
Avery 452 395 87% <20 <5%
Bristol 433 379 88% 28 7%
Clark 301 268 89% 15 6%
Edgar Road 351 338 96% <15 <5%
Hudson 245 218 89% 23 11%
Givens 414 385 93% 110 29%
TOTAL 2,196 1,983 90% 205 10%
CURRENT BOUNDARIES
School CapacityLive-In
EnrollmentUtilization
Low SES
%
SCENARIO 2 BOUNDARIES
School CapacityScenario
EnrollmentUtilization
Low SES
%
Low SES
Students
Low SES
Students
20
Scenario 3: Overview
Scenario 3: Description The intent of this scenario is to establish a boundary for Givens Elementary and balance utilization among all of the schools. This scenario also balances the socio-economics to the point that there is some trade off in reducing travel distances.
Benefits: • Best balance in socio-economics among all schools
Challenges:• Moderate number of students traveling more than 1
mile.• Has two detached attendance zones.• Continues to split the North Webster area.
Quick Metrics Current Scenario 3
Utilization Balance 80% - 127% 88% - 92%
Socio-Economic Balance 9%-13% 6% - 14%
Students Outside 1 Mile 564 586
Detached Boundaries 3 2
Legend
Current Boundary Outlines
Scenario Boundaries
Avery
Bristol
Clark
Edgar Road
Givens
Hudson
21
Scenario 3: Changes
Current Boundaries with Scenario 3 changes Scenario 3 Boundaries
To Givens from Bristol
To Givens from Clark
To Givens from Hudson
To Givens from Bristol
Legend
Current Boundary Outlines
Scenario Boundaries
Avery
Bristol
Clark
Edgar Road
Givens
Hudson
To Givens from Clark
To Givens from Avery
22
Scenario 3: Data
Enrollment, Capacity, Utilization Student Movement
Composition of Proposed Boundaries
All students enrolled in the 2020-21 school year, will have the choice to finish at that school, this table illustrates the “what-if scenario” for students moving to their newly assigned schools.
The chart below illustrates the composition of the scenario boundaries based on the current boundaries. For example, 79% of the students assigned to Clark reside within the current Hudson boundary and 21% within the current Edgar Road boundary.
Note: Capacity and utilization figures do NOT include any modular classrooms.
Quick Metrics Current Scenario 3
Utilization Balance 80% - 127% 88% - 92%
Socio-Economic Balance 9%-13% 6% - 14%
Students Outside 1 Mile 564 586
Detached Boundaries 3 2
Avery 452 500 111% 64 13%
Bristol 433 490 113% 43 9%
Clark 301 350 116% 25 7%
Edgar Road 351 447 127% 54 12%
Hudson 245 196 80% 19 10%
Givens 414 - - - -
TOTAL 2,196 1,983 111% 205 10%
Avery 452 416 92% 59 14%
Bristol 433 397 92% 34 9%
Clark 301 278 92% 17 6%
Edgar Road 351 310 88% 24 8%
Hudson 245 218 89% 23 11%
Givens 414 364 88% 48 13%
TOTAL 2,196 1,983 90% 205 10%
SCENARIO 3 BOUNDARIES
School CapacityScenario
EnrollmentUtilization
Low SES
%
Low SES
Students
CURRENT BOUNDARIES
School CapacityLive-In
EnrollmentUtilization
Low SES
%
Low SES
Students
Avery Bristol Clark Edgar Road Hudson Givens
Avery 0 0 0 0 84
Bristol 0 0 0 0 220
Clark 0 49 0 39 43
Edgar Road 0 78 59 0 0
Hudson 0 0 0 0 17
589TOTAL K-5 STUDENTS MOVED=
K-5 STUDENTS
MOVED
TO SCHOOL:
FRO
M S
CH
OO
L:
100%
23%
68%
60%
12%
79%
18%
12%
20%
21%
100%
82%
5%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Avery
Bristol
Clark
Edgar Road
Hudson
Givens
Composition of Proposed Boundaries
Avery Bristol Clark Edgar Road Hudson
23
Scenario 4: Overview
Scenario 4: Description The intent of this scenario is to establish a boundary for Givens Elementary and balance utilization among all of the schools. This scenario also moderately balances the socio-economics to the point that there is some trade off in reducing travel distances.
Benefits: • 2nd Best balance in socio-economics among all schools• Contiguous boundaries.
Challenges:• Largest number of students traveling more than one
mile.• A portion of the North Webster area continues to attend
Avery and will continue to cross Brentwood Blvd.
Quick Metrics Current Scenario 4
Utilization Balance 80% - 127% 85% - 97%
Socio-Economic Balance 9%-13% 6% - 19%
Students Outside 1 Mile 564 604
Detached Boundaries 3 0
Legend
Current Boundary Outlines
Scenario Boundaries
Avery
Bristol
Clark
Edgar Road
Givens
Hudson
24
Scenario 4: Changes
Current Boundaries with Scenario 4 changes Scenario 4 Boundaries
To Givens from Hudson
To Givens from Edgar Road
To Givens from Bristol
To Givens from Clark
To Givens from Bristol
To Givens from Bristol
Legend
Current Boundary Outlines
Scenario Boundaries
Avery
Bristol
Clark
Edgar Road
Givens
Hudson
To Givens from Clark
25
Scenario 4: Data
Enrollment, Capacity, Utilization Student Movement
Composition of Proposed Boundaries
All students enrolled in the 2020-21 school year, will have the choice to finish at that school, this table illustrates the “what-if scenario” for students moving to their newly assigned schools.
The chart below illustrates the composition of the scenario boundaries based on the current boundaries. For example, 78% of the students assigned to Bristol reside within the current Bristol boundary and 18% within the current Edgar Road boundary.
Note: Capacity and utilization figures do NOT include any modular classrooms.
Avery 452 500 111% 64 13%
Bristol 433 490 113% 43 9%
Clark 301 350 116% 25 7%
Edgar Road 351 447 127% 54 12%
Hudson 245 196 80% 19 10%
Givens 414 - - - -
TOTAL 2,196 1,983 111% 205 10%
Avery 452 391 87% 48 12%
Bristol 433 370 85% 16 4%
Clark 301 268 89% 15 6%
Edgar Road 351 325 93% 26 8%
Hudson 245 228 93% 23 10%
Givens 414 401 97% 77 19%
TOTAL 2,196 1,983 90% 205 10%
CURRENT BOUNDARIES
School CapacityLive-In
EnrollmentUtilization
Low SES
%
SCENARIO 4 BOUNDARIES
School CapacityScenario
EnrollmentUtilization
Low SES
%
Low SES
Students
Low SES
Students
Avery Bristol Clark Edgar Road Hudson Givens
Avery 0 0 0 0 109
Bristol 0 0 0 0 202
Clark 0 0 0 39 43
Edgar Road 0 82 0 0 40
Hudson 0 0 0 0 7
522TOTAL K-5 STUDENTS MOVED=
K-5 STUDENTS
MOVED
TO SCHOOL:
FRO
M S
CH
OO
L:
Quick Metrics Current Scenario 4
Utilization Balance 80% - 127% 85% - 97%
Socio-Economic Balance 9%-13% 6% - 19%
Students Outside 1 Mile 564 604
Detached Boundaries 3 0
100%
27%
78%
50%
100%
17%
11%
22%
100%
10%
83%
2%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Avery
Bristol
Clark
Edgar Road
Hudson
Givens
Composition of Proposed Boundaries
Avery Bristol Clark Edgar Road Hudson
26
Scenario 5: Overview
Scenario 5: Description The intent of this scenario is to establish a boundary for Givens and balance utilization among all of the schools by pulling in areas from each of the other schools. The majority of moves in this scenario are only into Givens.
Benefits: • Givens Boundary encompasses majority of the North
Webster Area.• Minimizes the number of families impacted
Challenges:• Creates 6 detached attendance boundaries.• Moderate number of students traveling more than 1
mile.
Quick Metrics Current Scenario 5
Utilization Balance 80% - 127% 83% -98%
Socio-Economic Balance 9%-13% 5% - 26%
Students Outside 1 Mile 564 556
Detached Boundaries 3 6
Legend
Current Boundary Outlines
Scenario Boundaries
Avery
Bristol
Clark
Edgar Road
Givens
Hudson
27
Scenario 5: Changes
Current Boundaries with Scenario 5 changes Scenario 5 Boundaries
To Givens from Clark
To Givens from Hudson
To Givens from Edgar Road
To Givens from Bristol
Legend
Current Boundary Outlines
Scenario Boundaries
Avery
Bristol
Clark
Edgar Road
Givens
Hudson
28
Scenario 5: Data
Enrollment, Capacity, Utilization Student Movement
Composition of Proposed Boundaries
All students enrolled in the 2020-21 school year, will have the choice to finish at that school, this table illustrates the “what-if scenario” for students moving to their newly assigned schools.
The chart below illustrates the composition of the scenario boundaries based on the current boundaries. For example, 88% of the students assigned to Hudson reside within the current Hudson boundary and 12% within the current Clark boundary.
Note: Capacity and utilization figures do NOT include any modular classrooms.
Avery 452 500 111% 64 13%
Bristol 433 490 113% 43 9%
Clark 301 350 116% 25 7%
Edgar Road 351 447 127% 54 12%
Hudson 245 196 80% 19 10%
Givens 414 - - - -
TOTAL 2,196 1,983 111% 205 10%
Avery 452 416 92% 22 5%
Bristol 433 386 89% 19 5%
Clark 301 260 86% 15 6%
Edgar Road 351 310 88% 24 8%
Hudson 245 204 83% 20 10%
Givens 414 407 98% 105 26%
TOTAL 2,196 1,983 90% 205 10%
CURRENT BOUNDARIES
School CapacityLive-In
EnrollmentUtilization
Low SES
%
SCENARIO 5 BOUNDARIES
School CapacityScenario
EnrollmentUtilization
Low SES
%
Low SES
Students
Low SES
Students
Avery Bristol Clark Edgar Road Hudson Givens
Avery 0 0 0 0 84
Bristol 0 0 0 0 104
Clark 0 0 0 25 65
Edgar Road 0 0 0 0 137
Hudson 0 0 0 0 17
432TOTAL K-5 STUDENTS MOVED=
K-5 STUDENTS
MOVED
TO SCHOOL:
FRO
M S
CH
OO
L:
100%
21%
100%
26%
100%
12%
16%
100%
34%
88%
4%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Avery
Bristol
Clark
Edgar Road
Hudson
Givens
Composition of Proposed Boundaries
Avery Bristol Clark Edgar Road Hudson
Quick Metrics Current Scenario 5
Utilization Balance 80% - 127% 83% -98%
Socio-Economic Balance 9%-13% 5% - 26%
Students Outside 1 Mile 564 556
Detached Boundaries 3 6
RESULTS
30
• 1,615 surveys responses were collected between January 13th and February 10th
• Of those, 9 paper surveys were collected and entered from the open house meetings.
• Respondents were asked to provide street of residence, this information was used by the committee to drill down to specific geographies.
• For the most part, respondents tended to favor options that kept them at their current schools.
Results:
31
Results: Summary
Scenario 1
Scenario 2
Scenario 3
Scenario 4
Scenario 5
32
• Students should be zoned to their closest schools.
• Schools should be socio-economically balanced.
• Allow rising siblings to stay at same school as the older siblings.
• If a home is rezoned to a lower SES school, it could impact property values.
• Property Values – In the CS history of these types for processes, we have never known of an auditor re-assessing property values based on schools of assignment. • Home values are typically more attributed to school district and high school
assignment
Results: Common Comments
RECOMMENDATIONBOUNDARY ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Recommendation Development
The committee met for 4 hours on 2/13 to review the community feedback as a group and to develop a recommendation. The recommendation on the following slides was endorsed by the vast majority of the committee. The group was also adamant that some additional considerations be shared with the board accompanying the recommendation.
Considerations: • Devote resources to Givens to support higher SES %.• Work with Givens community to build a thriving culture.• Work towards a “We are WGSD” mentality through districtwide sponsored
initiatives.
Dissenting Opinion:• Recognize that the 4% to 30% spread of low SES population is not ideal, SES
balance could not be achieved while maintaining neighborhood schools because of the housing distribution within the District.
35
Recommendation: Overview
Legend
Current Boundary Outlines
Scenario Boundaries
Avery
Bristol
Clark
Edgar Road
Givens
Hudson
Recommendation: Description
The recommendation is most similar to Scenario 2 as it was presented to the community.
Differences / Rationale: 1. Area moved from Clark to Givens in Scenario 2 remains
at Clark in this recommendation (Given proximity to school and connection by pedestrian bridge across I-44)
2. Area currently assigned to Clark east of Rock Hill and north of I-44 moves to Bristol. (Close proximity to Bristol)
3. Area between Kirkham and the railroad tracks moves to Givens (Potential growth area pointed at a facility that has room for expansion)
1
2
3
36
Recommendation: Changes
Current Boundaries with Recommended Changes Recommended Boundaries
To Givens from Bristol
To Givens from Bristol
To Givens from Edgar Road
From Edgar Rd to Bristol
To Givens from Hudson
To Givens from Avery
To Givens from Clark
Legend
Current Boundary Outlines
Scenario Boundaries
Avery
Bristol
Clark
Edgar Road
Givens
Hudson
37
Recommendation: Data
Enrollment, Capacity, Utilization Student Movement
Composition of Proposed Boundaries
All students enrolled in the 2020-21 school year, will have the choice to finish at that school, this table illustrates the “what-if scenario” for students moving to their newly assigned schools.
The chart below illustrates the composition of the scenario boundaries based on the current boundaries. For example, 82% of the students assigned to Hudson reside within the current Hudson boundary and 18% within the current Clark boundary.
Note: Capacity and utilization figures do NOT include any modular classrooms.
Avery Bristol Clark Edgar Road Hudson Givens
Avery 34 0 0 0 71
Bristol 0 0 0 0 220
Clark 0 35 0 39 16
Edgar Road 0 69 0 0 40
Hudson 0 0 0 0 17
K-5 STUDENTS
MOVED
TO SCHOOL:
FRO
M S
CH
OO
L:
Avery 452 500 111% 64 13%
Bristol 433 490 113% 43 9%
Clark 301 350 116% 25 7%
Edgar Road 351 447 127% 54 12%
Hudson 245 196 80% 19 10%
Givens 414 - - - -
TOTAL 2,196 1,983 90% 205 10%
Avery 452 395 87% 17 4%
Bristol 433 408 94% 27 7%
Clark 301 260 86% 15 6%
Edgar Road 351 338 96% 12 4%
Hudson 245 218 89% 23 11%
Givens 414 364 88% 111 30%
TOTAL 2,196 1,983 90% 205 10%
CURRENT BOUNDARIES
School CapacityLive-In
EnrollmentUtilization
Low SES
%
Low SES
Students
SCENARIO BOUNDARIES
School CapacityScenario
EnrollmentUtilization
Low SES
%
Low SES
Students
Recommendations – Additional Information
The committee spent significant time discussing alternatives to what ended up being recommended.
• Webster Hills – keeping this area in Bristol put Bristol near capacity and under-utilized Givens with a utilization under 80%. The only alternatives involved moving areas that were closer to Bristol to Givens.
• Concerns about 30% SES at Givens – the committee spent time attempting to reduce the SES% at Givens, the only way this could be accomplished would be to continue to use detached zones. The committee studied the area from North Webster assigned to Bristol in Scenario 3. The survey results for this area were not in favor of moving to Bristol and preferred scenarios which assigned them to Givens (Walkable).
THANK YOUWE APPRECIATE YOUR TIME
40
Webster Hills: What if’s
Legend
Current Boundary Outlines
Scenario Boundaries
Avery
Bristol
Clark
Edgar Road
Givens
Hudson
Webster Hills at Clark
Avery 452 500 111% 64 13%
Bristol 433 490 113% 43 9%
Clark 301 350 116% 25 7%
Edgar Road 351 447 127% 54 12%
Hudson 245 196 80% 19 10%
Givens 414 - - - -
TOTAL 2,196 1,983 90% 205 10%
Avery 452 395 87% 17 4%
Bristol 433 408 94% 27 7%
Clark 301 297 99% 15 5%
Edgar Road 351 338 96% 12 4%
Hudson 245 218 89% 23 11%
Givens 414 327 79% 111 34%
TOTAL 2,196 1,983 90% 205 10%
SCENARIO BOUNDARIES
School CapacityScenario
EnrollmentUtilization
Low SES
%
Low SES
Students
CURRENT BOUNDARIES
School CapacityLive-In
EnrollmentUtilization
Low SES
%
Low SES
Students
41
Webster Hills: What if’s
Legend
Current Boundary Outlines
Scenario Boundaries
Avery
Bristol
Clark
Edgar Road
Givens
Hudson
Webster Hills at Bristol
Avery 452 500 111% 64 13%
Bristol 433 490 113% 43 9%
Clark 301 350 116% 25 7%
Edgar Road 351 447 127% 54 12%
Hudson 245 196 80% 19 10%
Givens 414 - - - -
TOTAL 2,196 1,983 90% 205 10%
Avery 452 395 87% 17 4%
Bristol 433 445 103% 27 6%
Clark 301 260 86% 15 6%
Edgar Road 351 338 96% 12 4%
Hudson 245 218 89% 23 11%
Givens 414 327 79% 111 34%
TOTAL 2,196 1,983 90% 205 10%
SCENARIO BOUNDARIES
School CapacityScenario
EnrollmentUtilization
Low SES
%
Low SES
Students
CURRENT BOUNDARIES
School CapacityLive-In
EnrollmentUtilization
Low SES
%
Low SES
Students
42
Webster Hills: What if’s
Legend
Current Boundary Outlines
Scenario Boundaries
Avery
Bristol
Clark
Edgar Road
Givens
Hudson
Webster Hills at Bristol, Move Rock Hill area back to Clark
Avery 452 500 111% 64 13%
Bristol 433 490 113% 43 9%
Clark 301 350 116% 25 7%
Edgar Road 351 447 127% 54 12%
Hudson 245 196 80% 19 10%
Givens 414 - - - -
TOTAL 2,196 1,983 90% 205 10%
Avery 452 395 87% 17 4%
Bristol 433 410 95% 27 7%
Clark 301 295 98% 15 5%
Edgar Road 351 338 96% 12 4%
Hudson 245 218 89% 23 11%
Givens 414 327 79% 111 34%
TOTAL 2,196 1,983 90% 205 10%
SCENARIO BOUNDARIES
School CapacityScenario
EnrollmentUtilization
Low SES
%
Low SES
Students
CURRENT BOUNDARIES
School CapacityLive-In
EnrollmentUtilization
Low SES
%
Low SES
Students