wested report informational briefing by s pecial e ducation a dvisory c ouncil
TRANSCRIPT
WestEd Report
Informational Briefing
By
SpecialEducationAdvisoryCouncil
SEAC is Hawaii’s IDEA State Advisory Panel.
A primary function of SEAC is to advise the Department of Education of unmet needs within the State in the education of children with disabilities.
Special Education Comparison:Similar States/DistrictsHow does Hawaii measure up?
No One is Like Hawaii
State/District
Enrollment SWD % of Students with
IEPS
% of low income
students Alaska 131,000 15, 889 13.6 40
Delaware 129,000 16,936 14.7 51
Rhode Island
140,700 21,842 17.4 46
Hawaii 182,600 17,156 10.9 51
Hillsborough
200,287 28,173 14% 54
Orange County
183,021 20,813 11% 35
Comparing Students Served and % of Students in Poverty
Comparison of SWD NAEP ScoresBasic or Above Reading Basic or Above Mathematics
Gap between SWD and Others on NAEP Scores
District ComparisonsProficiency and Gaps:State Assessments
SWD Participation inRegular Education Classes
Gap Grids
Gap Grids
WestEd Report Timeline
Sept2010
Oct. 2012
HIDOE selects WestEd to complete
review
DOE releases report at a
Legis. Briefing
HIDOE initiates “System
Redesign” process
Projected Initiation of
implementation plans
Nov. 2011
Jan. 2013
Prelim ReportUpdate to CCCs
Update
to SEAC
Final 12.27.12WestEd
Report to DOE
Implementation Phases
SY 11-12 SY 14-15 ?????
Actual Timeline
SY 11-12 SY 12-13 SY 13-14 SY 14-15
Proposed Timeline
Preparation:Planning, Communication, Policies and Procedures
Sustaining:Monitoring, Accountability and Improvement
Implementation:Execution and Action
Organization and InfrastructureSection 1
1.1 Confusion in Roles
1.1.3 – Define roles responsibilities and functions
1.1.4 – Restructure to SEA/LEA
1.1.5 – Develop and monitor implementation
1.2 Parallel Mental Health Systems
1.2.1 – Align system of services and supports between mental health, education & behavioral health
Convene an interagency task group
Develop agreements that include a transition plan
1.3 Due Process diverts funds from programs and does not improve partnering
1.3.3 – Use SEAC, CCCs and other community groups to improve Alternative Dispute Resolution
Allocation of Resources and Management AccountabilitySection 2
2.1 Formulas to allocate staff and funding
2.1.2 – Review the implementation of the funding formula for results
2.2 Variation in Staffing
2.2.2 – Develop a process for communicating policies and procedures
2.3 Inconsistent use of staffing and available funds
2.3.2 - Develop clear and consistent policies and procedures regarding the use of staffing and funds
2.4 Non-public school placements the result of inadequate public programs
2.4.2 - Provide training and T.A. to schools and complexes to support improved practice
2.4.3 – Establish an annual review of the effectiveness of procedures
2.5 Accounting codes not used with fidelity making analysis of expenditures difficult
2.5.2 – Develop a systematic process for training and T.A.
2.5.3 – Develop a system and process for an annual review of effectiveness
Service Provision & Program and Student Performance OutcomesSection 3
3.1 IEP Students Performing Below Targets
3.1.1 – Develop a plan with specific timelines
3.1.2 – Identify and convene a workgroup of CASs, SEAC and parent organizations
QUESTIONS?