wfo binghamton maddox synoptic type flash flood classification study
DESCRIPTION
WFO Binghamton Maddox Synoptic Type Flash Flood Classification Study. By Christopher Gitro NWS Binghamton, NY. Motivation. Flash flooding remains the number 1 weather killer across the US 29 flash flood related fatalities in BGM’s CWA since Jan 1996 Most Recent: 01 Oct 10 - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
WFO Binghamton Maddox Synoptic Type Flash Flood
Classification Study
By Christopher GitroNWS Binghamton, NY
Flash flooding remains the number 1 weather killer across the US
29 flash flood related fatalities in BGM’s CWA since Jan 1996 ◦ Most Recent: 01 Oct 10
Knowledge of favorable synoptic patterns responsible for significant flash flooding → higher situational awareness →Pattern Recognition
First local attempt to classify large scale flash flood episodes based on large scale synoptic patterns
Motivation
Main Goal: Classify historically significant past flash flood episodes by the Maddox Synoptic classification scheme
Flash flood events from the winter of 1996 through present were examined ◦ 42 total Events
An event was classified if any of the following three occurred: 1) 5 or more flash flood reports from a single event 2) $500K crop/property damage 3) Fatality(ies) occurred
For synoptic environments in which the synoptic pattern did not reflect the traditional patterns as described by Maddox et al. (1979), the events were labeled as “Unclassified”
If a flash flood event resulted from a remnant tropical circulation moving across the area, the event was classified as “Tropical”
Methodology
Archived H50 (SPC, HPC) 00Z/12Z Maps
Archived HPC analyzed surface maps
Radar animations analyzed through GR Analyst
NAM BUFKIT Proximity Soundings◦ Sounding was selected by
picking the hour from closest NAM forecast point to time of initial flash flood report
◦ (LLJ winds (BUFKIT defined), Cloud Layer Winds, MBE Speeds, Warm Cloud Depth, etc)
Anomaly departures derived from NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis data
Methodology Cont.
Review
Synoptic Frontal
Meso High All images from Maddox et al. (1979)
Results
Frontal Synoptic Meso High Unclassified Tropical
0
5
10
15
20
25
7
20
2
10
3
Flash Flood Event Classifi-cation
Frontal, 16.67%
Synoptic 47.62%
Unclassi-fied23.81
%
Meso High, 4.76%
Tropical, 7.14%
Flash Flood Synoptic Type by Percentage
Frontal
Synoptic
Unclassified
Meso High
Tropical
42 Total Events
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
3
0
3
2
3
6
7 7
5
0
3 3
Events by Month
Frontal Synoptic Meso High Unclassified Tropical0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Type by Season
WinterSpringSummerFall
Frontal Synoptic Unclassified Meso High Tropical0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
LLJ Wind Speeds (kts)
Q1MinMedianMaxQ3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
LLJ Winds (kts) - All Events
Q1MinMedianMaxQ3
Frontal Synoptic Unclassified Meso High Tropical0
10
20
30
40
50
60
MBE Speed (kts)
Q1MinMedianMaxQ3
Frontal Synoptic Unclassifed Meso High Tropical0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
PWAT vs Climo (% of normal)
Q1MinMedianMaxQ3
Frontal Synoptic Unclassified Meso High Tropical0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
Warm Cloud Layer Depth (ft)
Q1MinMedianMaxQ3
Frontal Type Anomaly Departures
H50 Height (m)
PWAT
MSLP
H85 Meridional Winds
Sfc Air Temp
Synoptic Type Anomaly Departures
H50 Height (m) MSLP
H85 Meridional Winds
Sfc Air Temp
PWAT
Meso High Anomaly Departures
H50 Height (m) MSLP
H85 Meridional Winds
Sfc Air Temp
PWAT
Tropical Anomaly Departures
H50 Height (m) MSLP
H85 Meridional Winds
Sfc Air Temp
PWAT
1200 UTC 28 May 2002 SPC H50 Analysis (NAM)
1500 UTC 28 May 2002 HPC Analyzed SFC Analysis
Frontal Type ExampleBear Creek, PA (28 May 02)
Frontal Type ExampleBear Creek, PA Flash Flood (28
May 02)
• $5 Million Property Damage
1200 UTC 25 Jan 2010 SPC H50 Analysis (NAM)
Synoptic Type Example25 Jan10 Flash Flood
1500 UTC 25 Jan 2010 HPC Analyzed SFC Analysis
Synoptic Type Example25 Jan 10
Meso High ExampleColchester, NY Flash Flood
1200 UTC 19 June 2007 NCEP H50 Analysis
2100 UTC 19 June 2007 HPC Analyzed SFC Analysis
Meso High ExampleColchester, NY Flash Flood (19 Jun 07)
• $30 Million Property Damage• 4 Fatalities
The BGM HSA is susceptible to all 3 eastern US Maddox Flash Flood types
Synoptic type flash flood producing environments most common (20 cases)
Not all synoptic patterns cleanly fit into the Maddox classification scheme (10 unclassified, 3 tropical)
Frontal/Meso High less common but potentially devastating considering BGM’s highly variable terrain (terrain anchoring)◦ Both Meso High cases had fatalities
Conclusions
Synoptic flash flood producing environments showed the most variable spread (LLJ, Cloud Layer Winds, MBE Speeds)
Weaker forced frontal/meso high environments displayed less variable spread ◦ Smaller sample size
The use of anomaly departure information can heighten a forecaster’s SA of a potential high impact flash flood producing environment 24-48 hrs out
Conclusions cont.
ReferencesMaddox, R. A., C. F. Chappell and L. R. Hoxit, 1979: Synoptic and meso-α scale aspects of flash flood events. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 60, 115-123.