win in-house counsel day melbourne - dla piper win...win in-house counsel day melbourne wednesday 16...
TRANSCRIPT
WIN In-House Counsel Day Melbourne Wednesday 16 March 2016
DELIVERING BETTER: INNOVATION IN PRACTICE
LENNY LEERDAM (Partner, DLA Piper)
ALISON LAIRD (Legal Project Manager, Service Delivery & Quality, DLA Piper)
KATHERINE HOOPER (Special Counsel, DLA Piper)
Introduction
What we plan to cover:
1. Market Overview
2. Focussing on value
3. Delivering Better: Case Studies
4. In-house Legal Innovation
5. Key Take-Aways
2 Wednesday 16 March 2016 WIN In-House Counsel Day, Melbourne
Market Overview
External Challenges
4 WIN In-House Counsel Day, Melbourne Wednesday 16 March 2016
Reviewing relationships with
external counsel
Trusted advisor relationship
with fewer firms
Clients trends in mature
markets now impacting
Asia-Pac
Procurement more involved
in selecting legal providers
Resources becoming
increasingly scarce
(time, people, money)
CONSOLIDATION GLOBALISATION PROCUREMENT
More choice in legal delivery…
More legal options available
5 WIN In-House Counsel Day, Melbourne Wednesday 16 March 2016
Contract
lawyers
Low Cost
Centres Online
Legal
consultancy
Managed legal
services
Law Firms
Collaboration
What's your biggest
challenge as in-house
counsel?
Internal Challenge
Higher workload vs staffing numbers
Working "harder" is now not the only answer, if at all
Working "differently" and/or "smarter" - how exactly?
Providing technical legal advice is no longer "enough"
Need to be a responsible, valuable legal department ‘cost centre’
Delivering commercially savvy and strategic business advice
How in-house legal work is (and should be) organised
Efficiency and effectiveness of the overall legal service
What is external Counsel's role in this 'value' proposition?
7 Wednesday 16 March 2016 WIN In-House Counsel Day, Melbourne
Focussing on Value
Focusing on Value
9 9
Realise
the Value
Crystallise
the
Value
Identify
the
Value
STRATEGIC TACTICAL DELIVERY
PROCESS
EXCELLENCE Wednesday 16 March 2016 WIN In-House Counsel Day, Melbourne
Smarter Sourcing
10 10
There are, in resourcing terms, three categories of legal work:
Strategic &
Technical
Business as Usual
Bet
the
Farm
Bet the Farm
Of material impact to the balance sheet, directly or indirectly
"Unknown Unknown" - unforeseeable, unpredictable
HIGH RISK, PEAKY DEMAND
Buy hourly rate with tight budget control methodology
Strategic & Technical
"Known Unknown" - foreseeable, unpredictable
MEDIUM RISK, UNITARY DEMAND PEAKY BUT CONSTANT
AT MACRO LEVEL
Buy through matter per matter AFAs
Business as Usual
Supports, enables or protects business operations
"Known Known" - foreseeable, predictable
LOWER RISK, DEMAND CONSTANT
Buy through fixed price portfolios with unitary rebasing
Wednesday 16 March 2016 WIN In-House Counsel Day, Melbourne
Delivering Better:
Case Studies
Case Study: External Counsel Value
HIGH VOLUME LITIGATION
Identify the 'known knowns', and 'map' the
foreseeable, predictable patterns and 'flows' of
the business
Understand the critical KPI's, both for in-house
and external Counsel and ensure they are
captured in the business process
Collaborate to find the most efficient and effective
way of achieving the outcomes
Manage the overall risk, escalate when
necessary, review and refresh
12 Wednesday 16 March 2016 WIN In-House Counsel Day, Melbourne
GRANTS PROGRAM SUBJECT
TO EXTERNAL REVIEW
Identify the 'knowns', being the Strategic issues
from the perspective of in-house Counsel
Consider the 'unknowns', being the Technical
outcomes of those issues, so far as external
Counsel is concerned
Collaborate to find the most efficient and effective
way of achieving the outcomes
Manage the overall risk, escalate when
necessary, review and refresh
13
Case Study: External Counsel Value
Wednesday 16 March 2016 WIN In-House Counsel Day, Melbourne
Case Study: External Counsel Value
WHISTLE BLOWER LEGISLATION
Identify the critical operational, revenue and
reputational risks involved
Identify the stakeholders, the critical legislative or
policy path, and the support required from
external Counsel
Manage the 'unknown, unknown' (ie. the public
interest disclosure) according to the established
process
Manage the overall risk, escalate when
necessary, review and refresh
14 Wednesday 16 March 2016 WIN In-House Counsel Day, Melbourne
In-house Legal Innovation
How do other in-house teams add value
16 Wednesday 16 March 2016 WIN In-House Counsel Day, Melbourne
High Performing In-House Legal Teams
17
Business Insight
People
Organisation
Compliance & Control
Technology
Efficiency
Are you aligned to the business
in a way that enables proactive
identification of "legal risk"?
Does the balance of internal
and external resource meet the
needs of your business and
develop your people?
Lessons Learned
Strategy & Planning
Commitment Reporting
Rights Reporting
Operational Improvement
Reporting & Monitoring
Technical Queries
Case/Matter Management
Supplier Engagement &
Management
Does your governance model
enable you or inhibit you from
business partnering?
Do you use technology
internally and externally to
improve leverage?
How do you monitor and
improve efficiency of internal
processes and external
supplier engagements?
What are and how can you establish
that there are the appropriate levels of
control in place to minimise risk whilst
not straitjacketing the business?
Regulatory Compliance
Dispute Management
Rights Management
Commitment Management
Authority and Approvals
Process
Wednesday 16 March 2016 WIN In-House Counsel Day, Melbourne
How to become a high performing team
Smart resourcing
Tools and technology
Assess in-house status / "maturity"
18
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Initial Repeatable Defined Managed Optimised
Wednesday 16 March 2016 WIN In-House Counsel Day, Melbourne
Business Insight: Strategy & Planning
19
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Initial Repeatable Defined Managed Optimised
Inconsistent ad hoc.
Limited linkages.
No direct strategic
input from legal.
Legal generally not
seen as requirement
for strategy or
planning.
Legal/regulatory issues clearly identified and included in the strategy
and planning process
Business units perform
planning using different
processes by location.
Central timetable exists.
Legal consulted locally.
Limited project
management.
Legal involved in the
process but often after
key decisions have been
made by senior
management.
Comprehensive central
guidelines.
Centrally defined output &
timetable.
Corporate strategy shared
with legal function.
Efficient strategic planning
process.
Legal either actively
engaged; or lead process.
Well thought through
regulatory and legal
strategy.
Common and well
understood guidance.
Technology used
effectively.
Clearly defined processes
for all planning activities.
Centrally defined output &
timetable proactive
engagement from legal.
Legal core element to
central sign-off process.
Consistent linkage to legal
or regulatory obligations.
Some planning activities
performed in silos.
Wednesday 16 March 2016 WIN In-House Counsel Day, Melbourne
In-house Team Value
20 20
Things rarely go wrong inside legal!
"Legal Risk" becomes real either
before legal are aware of the issue
or once legal have done their bit
Pre-engagement "Legal Risk"
Breach of Statutory / Regulatory
duty
Post-engagement "Legal Risk"
Breach of contract
Failure to exploit rights
Failure to follow policy In-house Legal
Not involved
early enough
External legal
Counsel
Wednesday 16 March 2016 WIN In-House Counsel Day, Melbourne
Measuring value – How & Why?
Why
Self diagnosis
Implement strategic
improvements
Focus on reducing costs
Increase the influence of
your legal function
Develop and motivate your
team
21
How
Hard measurements
stats, $'s, numbers
Soft measurements
statement of outcomes that
legal has contributed to
"But for legal…"
Wednesday 16 March 2016 WIN In-House Counsel Day, Melbourne
Measuring value – What?
Common objectives:
Cost effectiveness
Productivity
Process efficiency
Cycle time
Quality and business
satisfaction
Legal panel efficiency
22
Metrics that can support
these objectives:
Staffing
Utilisation
Income
Costs
Compliance
Client satisfaction
Panel firm KPIs
Wednesday 16 March 2016 WIN In-House Counsel Day, Melbourne
Key Take-Aways
Key Take-Aways
More pressure on in-house teams to deliver more with less
Consider:
is your team structured in the best way to support the business?
are you partnering effectively with your external legal providers?
are you capturing your own "value-add"?
how to you track and monitor your legal matters?
how can you use your data better?
what do you need to do to move along the "maturity model" to
become a high performing in-house team?
24 Wednesday 16 March 2016 WIN In-House Counsel Day, Melbourne
Lenny Leerdam
Partner, Litigation & Regulatory
Alison Laird
Legal Project Manager
Katherine Hooper
Special Counsel
Litigation & Regulatory