wind energy: status, challenges, opportunities · mission statement: support the development of...
TRANSCRIPT
1Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
Wind Energy:Wind Energy:Status,Status,Challenges,Challenges,OpportunitiesOpportunities
C.P. C.P. ““CaseCase”” van Dam van Damcpvandam@[email protected]
NASA Internal Workshop on WindPower Capabilities
March18, 2010
2Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
OutlineOutline
• Background
• Why Wind Energy?
• Wind Energy– Status
– Challenges
– Opportunities
Source: Mayda
3Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
California Wind EnergyCalifornia Wind EnergyCollaborativeCollaborative
Mission Statement:Support the development of safe,reliable, environmentally sound,and affordable wind electricgeneration capacity within thestate of California by managing afocused, statewide program ofscientific research, technologydevelopment & deployment, andtechnical training.
CALIFORNIAWIND ENERGY
COLLABORATIVE
CaliforniaEnergy
Commission
Federal, state, andlocal government
agencies
Academia
Industry
Publicprograms
Government andindustry research
labs
Education&
Outreach
EngineeringResearch
Inter-agency,Inter-sector
Coordination
• A partnership of theCalifornia EnergyCommission and theUniversity of California
• Established in March 2002
• http://cwec.ucdavis.edu/
4Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
Why Wind Energy?Why Wind Energy?• Renewable
– Guaranteed “fuel” availability– Large available resource in USA– No cost volatility– Does not rely on water
• Clean– Emission free operation– No waste generation
• Installation– Rapidly deployed
• Security– Non-centralized installation and operation– No imported fuel requirement
• Economics– Cost effective energy– Local economic benefits
Source: van Dam
Source: GE
Cost of wind-based electricity, $c/kWh
5Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
Simple COE ComparisonSimple COE Comparison• Wind turbine
– 1 MW, $2.0 million, 20 years, Capacity Factor = 0.35
– COE = $32.62/MWh (based on capital cost only)
• Natural gas fired combined-cycle gasturbine CCGT– Natural gas = $4.50/MBtu (or MMBtu)
– Heat rate = 7000 Btu/kWh = 7.0 MBtu/MWh
– COE = $31.50/MWh (based on fuel cost only)
6Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
• In the 1980s, USA was theleader in installed wind-based electric powergeneration capacity
• From the 1990s untilrecently, other countriesoutpaced the USA
• Over the last few years,pace of installation in theUSA has increased rapidlyReasons:– Increase/uncertainty in
fossil fuel prices– PTC (Federal)– RPS (States)
Installed WindInstalled WindPower CapacityPower Capacity
7Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
Global InstalledGlobal InstalledWind PowerWind PowerCapacityCapacitySource: GWEC
8Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
U.S. Installed Wind PowerU.S. Installed Wind PowerCapacityCapacitySource: AWEA
9Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
Evolution of U.S. Utility-ScaleEvolution of U.S. Utility-ScaleWind Turbine TechnologyWind Turbine Technology
Year
Rot
or D
iam
eter
(m)
Source: NREL
10Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
Standard ArchitectureStandard Architecture
• Represents nearlyall new equipment
• Three blades
• Upwind rotor
• Active yaw
• Freestandingtower
11Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
VestasVestas3.0 MW3.0 MW90 m90 m
12Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
Technical Specifications - Technical Specifications - VestasVestasV90V90
• Rotor– Diameter 90 m– Swept area 6,362 m2
– Nominal rpm 16.1→Tip speed= π⋅D⋅rpm/60 = 75.9 m/s– Operational range 8.6 - 18.4 rpm– Number of blades 3– Power regulation Pitch/OptiSpeed
(Note, OptiSpeed not available in USA and Canada)
– Brake Independent blade pitch(Three separate hydraulic pitch systems)
• Tower– Hub height 80 m, 105 m
13Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
Technical Specifications - Technical Specifications - VestasVestasV90V90• Operational data
– Cut-in wind speed 4 m/s– Nominal wind speed 15 m/s– Cut-out wind speed 25 m/s
• Generator– Type Asynchronous with OptiSpeed– Rated output 3,000 kW– Operational data 50 Hz, 1000 V
• Gearbox– Type Two planetary and one helical stage
• Weight– Nacelle 70 t– Rotor 41 t– Tower
• 80 m, IEC IA 160 t• 105 m, IEC IIA 285 t
14Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
Region 4
• Region 1Turbine is stopped orstarting up
• Region 2Efficiency maximizedby maintainingoptimum rotor RPM(for variable speedturbine)
• Region 3Power limited throughblade pitch
• Region 4Turbine is stoppeddue to high winds(loads)
Turbine Power CharacteristicsTurbine Power CharacteristicsSource: Johnson et al (2005)Source: Johnson et al (2005)
15Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
• Solidity = Blade Area / Ad
• TSR = Tip Speed / Vw
• High power efficiency forrotors with low solidity andhigh TSR
• Darrieus (VAWT) is lessefficient than HAWT
Efficiency of Various Rotor DesignsEfficiency of Various Rotor DesignsButterfield (2008)Butterfield (2008)
Cp
Tip Speed Ratio TSR = π D RPM / (60 Vw)
16Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
Challenges: Challenges: OldOld and New and New• Environmental Impacts
– Birds and bats• “Reliance on fossil fuels hurts birds, plain and simple. Pollution, destruction of habitat from mining,
and potentially disastrous global climate change are all significant stresses on birds and other wildlife.Wind power, when sited properly after adequate study, is a better option. Modern wind projectsundergo a significant amount of review and study for a variety of factors before construction begins.”David, J. Miller, Executive Director, Audubon New York, 2006(http://ny.audubon.org/news/060711.htm)
– Visual• Windplant aesthetics have improved significantly since the 1980s
– Noise• Newer turbines are significantly quieter, driven by zoning ordinances and strict European noise
standards
• Cost– Cost of electricity from wind compares favorably to wholesale power prices
• Reliability– Improved engineering and design through accumulated years of experience
and international design standards have resulted in increased reliability butproblem areas remain
17Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
Challenges: Old and Challenges: Old and NewNew• Variability / Integration
– Increasing penetration of variable power sources such as wind has resulted in grid impact concerns– It is not necessary, economical, or desirable to manage the variability of each wind turbine or each wind
plant… manage the entire system, instead.– Load is the dominant component of the system.– Successfully integrating high penetrations isn’t trivial, but it is economically feasible
• Electric power transmission constraints– Transmission constraints are an issue for renewable and other electric power sources
• Size– Large size of turbines leads to challenges:
• Manufacturing• Transport• Construction cranes• Setbacks• Aviation safety
• Costs are up– Weak dollar, supply chain shortages
• Education– Rapid growth is creating demand for qualified personnel at all levels
• Financial crisis– Projects are halted because of difficulty accessing credit– Large financial losses diminish value of PTC
18Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
Challenges to Meet Goal of 20%Challenges to Meet Goal of 20%Wind by 2030Wind by 2030• Massive growth in installed
capacity– 25 GW at start of 2009– > 300 GW by 2030
• Widely distributed across the USA– High wind sites– Moderate wind sites– Offshore
• Performance is critical– Capital cost– Capacity factor– O&M cost
• Human capital for manufacturing,logistics, installation, O&M
Source: NREL
19Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
Critical Performance ChallengesCritical Performance Challenges• Reduction in capital cost
– Recently, turbine cost haveincreased sharply
• Increase in turbine capacityfactor– Larger rotors for given
rated power
• Reduced O&M cost– Rapid growth has resulted
in reliability issues
• Foster confidence inindustry
Source: NREL
20Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
Reduced Capital CostReduced Capital Cost• Learning Curve Effect
– Measures cost reduction foreach doubling of capacity
– Historically learning curve effecthas been small for windturbines because of rapidchanges in technology and size
• Opportunities– Maturing of industry is leading
to less frequent productchanges
• GE, shipped 10,000th 1.5MW turbine in November2008
– Weight reduction• Less material• Advanced materials
– More automation– Design for manufacturability
21Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
Increased Capacity FactorIncreased Capacity Factor• Larger rotors
– Increased energycapture
– Longer, lighter blades– Load alleviation
(passive, active)
• Taller towers– Higher wind speeds– Innovative towers,
erection methods
• Reduced losses– Improved drivetrains,
power electronics– Wake losses
22Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
Advanced Advanced Drivetrain Drivetrain R&DR&D
Enron/GE 1.5 MW Clipper Multi-Generator
NPS Direct Drive-Permanent Magnet
Zond Z-750 Integrated
GEC Medium Speed Source: McNiff, 2007
23Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
Increased ReliabilityIncreased ReliabilitySource: Veers, 2007Source: Veers, 2007
Gea
rbox
Roto
r
Air b
rake
Mec
hani
cal b
rake
Pitc
h sy
stem
Mai
n sh
aft /
bea
ring
Gen
erat
or
Yaw
drive
Win
dvan
e/an
emom
eter
Elec
trica
l con
trols
Elec
trica
l sys
tem
Hydr
aulic
s
Sens
ors
Wind Stats: 2003-05 Stop Hours per Turbine Subsystem
• Impact- Reduced O&M- Increased energy capture- Increased availability- Increased confidence in technology- Reduced financing and insurance cost
24Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
Offshore Wind Energy DevelopmentOffshore Wind Energy DevelopmentMiddelgrunden, Copenhagen, Denmark, 1st Offshore Windplant, 20 x Siemens 2.0 MW
Depth of 20 m is about limit for off-shore wind turbines with monopile foundations
Source: van Dam
25Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
C.P. van Dam
Source: NREL
U.S. Deep Water Coastal WindU.S. Deep Water Coastal WindResourceResource
26Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
Source: NREL
27Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
Airborne Wind PowerAirborne Wind Power
28Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
Airborne Wind Power GenerationAirborne Wind Power Generation• Higher and more constant winds at higher
altitudes. Power densities as high as 20 kW/sqmcompared to < 0.8 kW/sqm for terrestrial systems
• Major hurdles facing airborne wind powergeneration are:– Cost competitiveness of land-based wind power and
other renewables (e.g., MHK: 8 kW/sqm)– Lack of airborne wind power demonstration systems– Lack of cost of energy model for airborne wind energy
29Wind Energy OverviewWind Energy Overview
Departing ThoughtsDeparting Thoughts
• Wind power is:– Clean, renewable, emission-free– A mature and reliable technology– Economically viable
• Wind power can and will continue to play asignificant role in the global energy portfolio atutility-, community- and building-scales
• Growth has brought new issues, but also newopportunities
• Lack of transmission and concerns about windintegration are most pressing issues that arebeing addressed
• RD&D is being conducted to further improvewind turbine and blade technology and reducewind COE Shiu