winning at the politics of usability

63
1 Winning at the Politics of Usability John Sorflaten – Human Factors International Michael Rawlins – Open Solutions Jeff Sauro – Oracle; Measuring Usability Javier Broch – Columbia University Linda Chadwick – Duck Creek Technology

Upload: cody

Post on 09-Jan-2016

24 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Winning at the Politics of Usability. John Sorflaten – Human Factors International Michael Rawlins – Open Solutions Jeff Sauro – Oracle; Measuring Usability Javier Broch – Columbia University Linda Chadwick – Duck Creek Technology. Politics Defined. “The Buck Stops Here” – Harry Truman - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

1

Winning at the Politics of Usability John Sorflaten – Human Factors International Michael Rawlins – Open Solutions Jeff Sauro – Oracle; Measuring Usability Javier Broch – Columbia University Linda Chadwick – Duck Creek Technology

Page 2: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

2

Politics Defined “The Buck Stops Here” – Harry Truman So…. Take ownership of political

problems.

Page 3: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

3

Who has heard this?…. “We don’t have time for usability now” “We don’t need you right now…maybe

later.” “This project is almost done. Can you

check it out?” Others?

Page 4: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

4

But….we’re here… Many organizations heard the message

and now have usability staff And trained them… And hope to use them… And… (gulp….) … you don’t get used….

Page 5: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

5

The art of politics… “Politics moves mountains with mere

words.” -- anonymous

Page 6: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

6

Here’s some words….

1. Speak credibly – John Sorflaten2. Have credentials – Michael Rawlins3. Talk the talk – Javier Bloch4. Be quantitative – Jeff Sauro5. Do the dew. Get moxie. – Linda

Chadwick

Page 7: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

7

John: Speaking Credibly

Roadbump? You: “I think we should use a drop down

list here to make it easier to type the entry.”

Them: “That’s your opinion. Here’s my opinion….”

Guideline: avoid giving opinionsSee eleven more shock absorbers,

next…

Page 8: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

8

Cite your Data (top 4 winners):

1. “Research indicates…” (e.g., www.usability.gov)

2. “Our usability testing shows…”3. “Our standards say…” (and they have

been tested for usability)4. “Best practices suggest that…”

(usability training, books, gurus…)

Page 9: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

9

Do Gedanken Experiments (Einstein)

5. Cognitive task analysis: Identify loads… • Visual• IntellectualE.g., To select a radio button:

1. decide to use mouse (I); 2. look for mouse (V+Mo); 3. reach, grab (Mo); 4. re-position pointer (V+Mo); 5. select option (V, I, Me, Mo)

• Memory• Motor

Page 10: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

10

Speak Objectively…

6. “I don’t know…we’ll run a usability test” (avoid speaking for all users)

7. “If I were to conduct a UT, I expect x% of subjects to have this problem…” (give reasons, too)

8. “If I were a UT subject, I would probably be puzzled by…”

Page 11: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

11

Borrow Findings…

9. “Other UTs covered similar issues…” (and those results suggest we do x)

10. “Our interviews and observations showed end-users actually did x...”

11. “End-users said they thought x…” (collective mental model)

Page 12: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

12

Now, “Speak Credibly”… Avoid opinion like “I think” or “I feel” Use your data (top 4 winners) Use thought experiments (VIMM) Speak objectively (If I were…) Borrow findings (other tests, interviews..)

Page 13: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

13

Michael: Have Credentials

Roadbump? You: “I read that Jakob Nielsen said…” Them: “Yeah, but Jarrod Spool said…”

See 5 improved seats, next…

Page 14: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

14

1. Get R-E-S-P-E-C-T (Thanks Aretha!)

If you’re a gatekeeper for usability, can you demonstrate earning that role?

Doctors get an M.D.; Executives get an MBA. Pilots get a license.

What’s your “white coat and stethoscope”?

PhD? MA? CUA? (Certified Usability Analyst); IIBA? (International Institute of Business Analysis certification)

Page 15: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

15

2. Get Style Did you pass a driver’s license test? What did it mean? A credential validates our knowledge Self-confidence creates authority Self-efficacy shows up in our “style”

Page 16: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

16

3. Be A Professional Professional-ism means membership,

peer review, demonstrated skills Passing a test means “initiation” “A Professional” means management

treats you with: Respect Allegiance Expectations

Page 17: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

17

4. Network Your Community… Read and meet your peers… Meet the person next to you. Share your main political challenges. Share solutions, ideas. Share phone number and email. Follow up and network again. “What’s their personality type?”

Page 18: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

18

5. Ethically Negotiate and Communicate Risks…

It’s not important to win every argument…

Allow people to reach the correct conclusion on their own time. Supply the kernels of knowledge.

Share the importance of open, direct communication.

Page 19: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

Page 19

Index

Javier: Talk the Talk

Page 20: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

Page 20

Political Steps - roadmap

1.Define Strategy & Interview stake holders

2.Usability budged

3.BAD GUY - external group to execute political

4.Committee & Tools

5.Fund one project

6.Train & Hire usability

Index

Page 21: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

Page 21

Political (elevator) speech –I make technology easy to use

–Simplify things

–Tech. for my mom

–Humanize technology

–Lower the cognitive load

–Make things simpler to use

Page 22: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

Page 22

Winning at Politics: ready to say? be unpopular?

– “My feedback does not count, I’m not the intended user”

– What your boss likes might not be what your users like

– Negative feedback

– Culture to satisfy the “board room” (not the user)

– Involve all the parties

Index

Page 23: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

Page 23

Expected political obstacles and roadblocks

– The usability of Usability work

– ”I know what the user wants”

– The stakeholder “I like this…”

– “I like this type of web technology”

– “If I can find it, they could find it”

Index

Page 24: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

Page 24

Why change the process?

• Ownership? Decentralization

• No usability $, No standards

• The wake up call. Nobody wants to do it

• Customer might only interact via web

• No inventory. Duplication Index

Page 25: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

Page 25

Why change the process? (Cont.)

• No focus on user (UCD)

• Political design

• Every one has an opinion

• Every one wants a link

• The boss opinion

.. your reasons …

Index

Page 26: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

Page 26

E-mail usability

Page 27: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

Page 27

Page 28: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

Page 28

Index

Page 29: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

Page 29

Political gain … Collecting simple Usability Data

What ..

– are your …. user groups? …frequent tasks?

– key information do your users access the most?

– type of services?

– part of your site do users use the most?

Index

Page 30: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

Page 30

Index

Page 31: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

31

Measuring Usability

Politics of Quantitative Usability

Jeff Sauro

June 18th 2008

Page 32: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

32

Quanta-Phobia

Page 33: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

33

Lies,

Damn Lies

& Statistics

… and usability ?

Page 34: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

34

You Can't Manage What You Don't Measure

Metrics allow for ROI of Usability

Page 35: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

35

6/8 Complete

75% Completion Rate

What do you Report?

Completion Rates

Page 36: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

36

75%

Page 37: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

37

Release your inner Math Geek

Page 38: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

38

What is the true Completion Rate ?6/8 Complete

0 10050

2.5% 2.5%

95% Confidence Interval (40%, 94%)

95%

Page 39: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

39

Wide Margin of Error—Why Bother?

95% CI (40%, 94%) = 54 points

Page 40: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

40

Use Benchmarks / Criteria

0 10050 70

91%

60%

6/8 Complete

60% Chance 70% of Users Can Complete

97.5%

40

Page 41: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

41

Dealer’s Hand

Your Hand

60% Chance You Win

Page 42: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

42

60% Chance of Rain

Page 43: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

43

60% On Time Arrival

Page 44: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

44

60% Chance of Successful Operation

Page 45: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

45

1.Benchmarks—What is the min completion rate?

2.How sure do you need to be you’ve improved?

3.Quantify the unknown with CI’s

4.Work within the Limitations of Small Samples

Be brave and be quantitative

http://measuringusability.com/UPA

Calculators & Formula Online

Page 46: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

46

Appendix

Page 47: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

47

Sample size

Think-aloud Studies

Normality

Time on Task

Page 48: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

48

Diagnosis /Comparisons in Think-Aloud

One dot does a lot

Page 49: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

49

Managing Non-Normality

Log Transformation

Page 50: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

50

Margin of Error for Task Time

Sample Size

Marg

in %

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Cv

0.70

0.300.48

Margin % vs Sample Size for Typical CVs

Samples < 20 Have > 20% Margin of Error

Page 51: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

51

Sample Size

Perc

ent

of Cri

teria

1101008060402015104

93

90

85

80

75

70

60

50

Sample Size Needed for % of Criteria to be SignificantCV of .48

Use Benchmarks / Criteria

How Long Should the task take?

Page 52: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

5252

Linda: Do the Dew. Get Moxie.

Roadbump? You: “Why don’t we focus more on

usability?” Them: “But there’s so much to do, so

many other problems to solve.”

See 5 steering tips next…

Page 53: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

5353

The Misperceptions …

Page 54: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

5454

The Misperceptions …

Page 55: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

5555

The Misperceptions …

Page 56: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

5656

1. Be “Coordinator” vs. “Expert” Reduce “threat” to colleagues egos Respect and listen to opinions Avert resentment, foster team work Now they’ll listen to your ideas Now they’ll WANT “cool and usable” Make the system work for you

Page 57: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

57

Change

"Our dilemma is that we hate change and love it at the same time; what we really want is for things to remain the same but get better”

  --  Sydney J. Harris

57

Page 58: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

5858

2. Use “Change Management” Check out this discipline, get a book Publish positive reports, experiences Give advance notice on changes Personal messages better than mass mail Update people on project progress

Page 59: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

5959

3. Reward “Early Adoption” At meetings, praise individual usability

efforts Start positive feed-back loops Reinforce champion’s confidence in your

work Give your champion something to brag

about

Page 60: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

6060

4. Spread the Usability Training Avoid energy-drain of endless questions Packaged training lets others see the

“secrets” You are the “usability consultant” to others “Word processing” now done by everyone Range of training: one-hourhalf daymore You’ll keep job security, amidst teaching

others

Page 61: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

61

What are you called?

61

Page 62: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

6262

5. Job Title Finesse Re-think “job title du jour” phenomenon Create a hierarchy of usability titles NOT a “dead-end” job (for tired people) Promote path for advancing usability careers Insure salary perks for increased skills/scope All this acknowledges: “career professional” Usability will never disappear Do the due. GET MOXIE!

Page 63: Winning at the Politics  of Usability

63

John: Rapping Up Politics Doing the dew (due) means “politics” Who would like more moxie? Tell us your take-home rap…

! Wow… ! Sure… ! Love it… ! Goforit…

E-mail your ideas: [email protected]