wireless iot: the last 100 metres

16
London IoT Meetup, 24-Nov-2015 Wireless IoT: The last 100 metres Peter Claydon

Upload: peter-claydon

Post on 22-Jan-2018

180 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Wireless IoT: The last 100 metres

London IoT Meetup, 24-Nov-2015

Wireless IoT: The last 100 metres

Peter Claydon

Page 2: Wireless IoT: The last 100 metres

Agenda

• A slide about ContinuumBridge

• Ways of connecting by wireless

• Factors influencing which protocol to choose

• Pros and cons of different protocols

• Conclusion

2

Page 3: Wireless IoT: The last 100 metres

ContiuumBridge – What we do

RetailSmart

EnergyWarranty/

MaintenanceE-HealthSecurity

Assisted

Living

Services

User Interface BridgeDashboards

Facilities

Connect devices to the Internet

Manage them

Provide connected services

3

Page 4: Wireless IoT: The last 100 metres

Connecting by wireless

4

0 10-100 2,000 5,000 metres

Hub

Base

Station

Network

Servers

Page 5: Wireless IoT: The last 100 metres

Which protocol? The laws of physics

• FSPL = Free Space Path Loss

• What this means is that, all else being equal a radio signal will go

approx. 3x the distance at 870 MHz (eg: Z-Wave) as at 2.4 GHz (eg:

WiFi)

• Also, low frequencies:

– Have better building penetration

– Reflect/refract better

5

Page 6: Wireless IoT: The last 100 metres

Which protocol? Meshing

• Messages can be routed through other devices

• Routing nodes generally must be mains powered

• Need to think about where routing nodes are needed

– Difficult for many applications

• Meshing protocols:

( ) ( )

HubRouting

NodeLeaf

Node

6

Page 7: Wireless IoT: The last 100 metres

Which protocol? Throughput

Protocol Throughput Frequency Band (MHz) *

Bluetooth LE 0.27 Mbps 2400

WiFi 10+ Mbps 2400

IEEE 802.15.4ZigBee, 6LoWPAN, Thread

0.25 (0.02) Mbps 2400, (868) **

Z-Wave 0.04 Mbps 868

SigFox 16 bps/0.02 bps over time 868

LoRa 10 Kbps instantaneous 868

3GPPGPRS, EDGE, HSPA, LTE

48 Kbps -> 100 Mbps+ 800, 900, 1800, 2100

• Unless you need audio or video, a few bits per second is enough

• Also need to consider latency (how long data takes to get there)

* European bands. Other parts of world use some different bands

** 802.15.4-based protocols are almost always in 2.4 GHz ISM band

7

Page 8: Wireless IoT: The last 100 metres

Which protocol? Battery life

• There’s no magic – save power by turning things off

• In other words:

– Don’t communicate more often than you need to

– Keep other processing to a minimum

8

Page 9: Wireless IoT: The last 100 metres

Protocols – Bluetooth Low Energy

Pros Cons

Connects to all smart phones Can your application reply on a phone?

Cheap radio Can only assume 10 metres range

Very large community No meshing today (it’s coming)

Coin cells only last months

9

Page 10: Wireless IoT: The last 100 metres

Protocols – WiFi

Pros Cons

Connects to all smart phones Connections need to be managed by people

Connects to ubiquitous routers

Large community Today’s WiFi is power-hungry(802.11ah is coming)

Cheap radio

Better range than Bluetooth

Higher throughput than other protocols

10

Page 11: Wireless IoT: The last 100 metres

Protocols – IEEE 802.15.4

Pros Cons

Lower power consumption than WiFi Typically short range without meshing

6LoWPAN & Thread use IPv6 – can be routed directly to cloud platforms

There are lots of flavours to choose from

Support mesh Lack off-the-shelf devices

Becoming more widely used – support from Google & others

Less immunity to interference than WiFior Bluetooth

11

Page 12: Wireless IoT: The last 100 metres

Protocols – Z-Wave

Pros Cons

Lots of off-the-shelf devices available Typically short range without meshing (comparable to WiFi)

Battery life of 1-3 years, depending on device type & application

Proprietary (chips & protocol software), so modems cost a few £1

Supports mesh Standard hubs are restrictive (designed for home automation)

Widely supported

12

Page 13: Wireless IoT: The last 100 metres

Protocols – Low Power, Wide-Area Networks

Pros Cons

Range of up to 5 km Limited data throughput, in some cases very limited (12 bytes, 6x per hour)

Long battery life All proprietary. Which one do you use? *

Managed networks Managed networks

Cheap radios

No need for a local hub

• * There are more than are listed here

• 3GPP is standardising its own LP-WAN

13

Page 14: Wireless IoT: The last 100 metres

Protocols – Mobile networks

Pros Cons

Existing networks with good coverage Coverage is anything but universal

Networks in almost every country Relatively expensive radios (but GPRS < £8in small quantities)

No need for a hub (can be used to connect to a hub)

At least £1 per month connection charge

Built-in security Short battery life (unless modem connectsvery infrequently)

Large community

IP connection directly to cloud platforms

14

Page 15: Wireless IoT: The last 100 metres

Conclusion

Choice depends on the application

– There are a lot of choose from and probably always will be

What did ContinuumBridge do?

1. Started using Bluetooth and Z-Wave

– Battery life and range are not good enough for some applications

2. Proprietary 868 MHz protocol to cellular-connected hub

– Range: 3 floors of an office building

– Battery life: 4-5 years

15

Page 16: Wireless IoT: The last 100 metres

Thank you

Email: [email protected]

Twitter: @PeterClaydon

Web: www.continuumbridge.com