world bank/undp/bilateral aid energy sector...

,f/' __ * ~~~103 1

World Bank/UNDP/Bilateral AidEnergy Sector Management Assistance Program

INSTITUTE OF RESOURCE ASSESSMENT

UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM

AND

SWEDISH SPACE CORPORATION

KIRUNA

MAPPING OF WOODFUEL RESOURCES IN TANZANIA

USING SPOT SATELUITE DATA

I.S. KIKULA, E.K. SHISHIRA AND B. PAULSSON

REPORT FOR JOINT UNDP/WORLD BANK EHIERGY SECTOR

MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1990

Household Energy UnitIndustry and Energy DepartmentThe World BankWashington, D.C. 20433

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

TABLE OF CONTENTSPage No.

EXECUTIVE SUMKARY ................................... ............ iIntroduction .................. *.* .... .......................iMethodology ........ ................ 0 * iii

Results ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ivThe Use of SPOT Imagery Dataeoa.ta................... v

I. INTRODUCTIONeso9a .. 1Background to the Project.oo..o...o ject....... e. ee.. 1Overview of Remote Sensing for Vegetation Mappingin Tanzania...................... . . . 5

Terms of Reference ................ . 14

II. AREAS COVERED ............................................. 16The Tabora-Mwanza Segment.............................. .. 16The Arusha Segment............. *O.... ... 18.he Dar-es-Salaam Segment ....... ..................... .. 19

III. METHODOLOGY ....... o... o............................... 19Pre-study and Development of Methods................... 19Digital classifications........ ................ ....... 21{Output ............. ............................... 21Type Map**. .................................... 22Vegetation Index Map.................................. 22Combined Map.......................................... 22Visual Interpretation.. ................... 22Review of Pre-study Results and DefinitionMethodology for the Full Scale Study ................ 23

Image Acquisition, Processing and Delivery ............ 25General Production Procedure ........ .. ................ 25SPOT Programming and Data Acquisition ............... 25Production of Imagery....................... .. .... 27Mapping Classification . .............................. . 28Fieldwork .o*.**..o.oooo*..ooo.o.so..o.o......................... 32Timing of fieldwork........ ........................ .. . 32Fieldwork Procedureo...oo...........**e.eoe**........9 32Preparation for fieldwork. ........................... 33Visual Interpretation of the 1:50,000 Map Sheets,Preparation of Overlays and area Measurements....... 35

IV. SPOT DATA AS A BASE FOR VEGETATION ANALYSIS INSUBSAHARAN AFRICA.................................o....... 37

Seasonal effects .. .. ....... ..... .... . 37Acquisition and Delivery of Data-Consitions andConstraints ... _... .ooe."o... o***6..oo.......................... 38

Cost of Operations and Timing of the Project.......... 44Analysis: Problems and Prospects Relating tothis Type of Remote Sensing Operations................ 44

Page No.

V. THE OVERLAYS................. ......... ......... **** ..... .. 49

VI. EUT ................................. 49

VII. REFERENCES ........................................... 54

TABLES:

1. The Legend Used in the Main Study ..................... vi1. Population Projections for the Four Target Urban

2. Comparative Characteristics of Land ResourceSatellites .................................................... .10

3. SPOT Scenes and Map Sheets Required per Location...... 154. Demand-Supply Estimates for Woodfuel/Forestry

Project Areas ................... 175. The Legend Used in the Main Study ..................... 296. Imagery Acquisition... . .................. ... 427. Land Cover Interpretability From SPOT Images .......... 478. Summary Sheet Area Coverage Data - Arusha....o....... 509. Summary Sheet Area Coverage Data - Dar-es-Salaam ...... 5110. Summary Sheet Area Coverage Data - Iringa........... .. 5211. Summary Sheet Area Coverage Data - Tabora/Mwanza...... 53

FIGURES:

1: Segmental Coverage with SPOTSAT Over Tanzania........ ii1: Segmental Coverage with SPOTSAT Over Tanzania......... 22: Improvements in the Resolution of Satellite Imagery. 53: SPOT Receiving Stations .................... ........... 94: Coverage Characteristics of SPOT Satellite ........... 11

3: Revisit Capabilities--.......-...... 000 -............. 126: Reflectivity of Different Bands...................... 137: Production Procedure at SSC Satimage................. 268: Mean Railfall - Temperature Lumbwe Me.eorological

Station 1977-88 ......... .......................... 399: Mean Rainfall - Temperature Ulowa Meteorological 40

Station 1977-88 .....................se............... 4010: Mean Rainfall - Temperature Urambo Meteorological

Station 1978-88 ................................................. 41

ANNEfES:

1. Tabora-Mwanza Segment Area Statistics2. Iringa Segment Area Statistics3. Arusha Segment Area Statistics4. Dar-es-Salaam Area Statistics

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Introduction

1. This is a report for the joint World Bank/UNDP Energy SectorManagement Assistance Program (ESMAP) en .he mapping of natural woodlandsin Tanzania using SPOT satellite data. The contract for the study wassigned on 24th Nov. 1987. The study covers four woodfuel catchmentareas, namely those around Dar es Salaam, Iringa, Tabora-Mwanza andArusha (See Fig. 1). All the areas covered are important woodfuel targetareas for either urban supply, the tobacco industry or both.

2. The report consists of the following parts:

- Executive Summary- Main Report- Annex 1: Tabora-Mwanza Segment Statistics- Annex 2: Iringa gegment Statistics- Annex 3: Arusha Segment Statistics.- Annex 4: Dar-es-Salaam Segment Statistics

3. The assessment of the woodfuel resources was to be done inthree main stages, namely: a pre-study (to determine the methodology);the production of imagery maps and ground cover/vegetation overlays,which is the essence of this study; and the final stage will be a biomassinventory based on the ground cover/vegetation maps produced by thisstudy. The objective of this last stage is the generation of biomassdata. It will also provide details on species composition of thedifferent land cover types. The information accumulating from all thesetasks will form the basis for more systematic programs to upgrade themanagement of the peri-urban woodfuel sources and those in the tobaccogrowing areas.

4. This work is an outcome of a consensus reached between theGovernment of Tanzania and ESMAP after reviewing the Energy Assessmentreport on Tanzania (UNDP/World Bank 1984). The need was expressed toformulate and implement comprehensive woodfuel development strategies forthe major urban centers of Dar es Salaam, Dodoma, Mwanza and the tobaccoproducing regions of Tabora and Iringa. Subsequently, an ESMAP mission;carried out in October 1986 and culminating in an interim report in April1987, identified the options for alleviation of woodfuel suppliesshortages. It also identified the need for updating the information onthe nature and extent of tree biomass resources in the peri-urban andtobacco growing areas as a basis for planning tioodfuel and woodlandsmanagement.

5. The first step in the assessment process involved the use ofsatellite remote sensing methods to generate up-to-date stratified mapsof woody biomass/land cover types. Swedish Space Corporation wascontracted to provide SPOT satellite images and the Institute of Resource

- ii -

Figure 1: Segmental Coverage with SPOTSAT Over Tanzania

I I ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~IE 30e 320 34e 36 38 40e E

UGANDA

0 80 160 240 km

3 14-1:L, |Dv~c 35L.Nyaa5

InternMpatnal boundary

…Road~~~55.

NATURAL WOOI LAN.S ESGMENT M°

3 LAYS 35 - >7X

~egmentaI covrae wIt SPTA data ii idl^

oAer Tn zn ag 1 358

2 374 34e ~~~~ 36e n 3e 4 374an 365-*~~~~6 IISingien MOZ MB10U

Segmental coveranylk IRING SPTSTaaa *;' '"over SEnzani _ S

- iii -

Assessment (I.R.A.) of the University of Dar es Salaam to prepare the mapoverlays from the imagery. The maps were then to be used by an inventoryteam which wou'-i assess the woody biomass in the areas covered by theproject.

6. Although aerial photography and Landsat TM imagery data wasconsidered, it was decided that, from the point of view of ground coverinformation required using the most cost effective means, that SPOTimagery would be used.

Methodology

7. The main activities of the study were SPOT data acquisition;precision correction and contrast enhancement of images; mosaicconstruction; fieldwork for ground verification; visual interpretation ofland cover classes; reproduction of overlays; and reporting.

8. In order to determine logistical and methodological issues apre-study preceded the main mapping exercise using selected images forTabora and Iringa Regions. The pre-study determined:

(a) The methodology for the full scale study and defined the groundcover/vegetation types included in the stratification.

(b) The sampling intensity required for ground verification toachieve acceptable mapping accuracy of ground cover/vegetationtypes.

(c) The best combination of interpretation methods for the fullscale study.

(d) The best period for registration of SPOT data. Details of thepre-study are contained in the report by Bystrom et al; (1987)and Kikula et al; (1988).

9. Based on the pre-study, it was concluded that it was possibleto map more land cover types using visual interpretation than was thecase when digital interpretation was used. Moreover the overall accuracyof the visual interpretation was significantly higher tha;, the computerbased digital classification. This is particularly so when there is hazeor scattered clouds obscuring the imagery.

10. The optimal time for imag6ry data registration was found to bethe late dry scason from mid October to mid December. A less favourablealternative was at the end of the principal wet season in April andMay. Imagery data acquisition started in May 1987 and finished inDecember 1988. The extended time was necessary because of cloud coverover parts of the Arusha and Dar-es-Salaam segments.

- iv -

11. The procedure followed in the production of images at SSCSatimage involved:

- programming of the SPOT satellite;

- data acquisition and evaluation;

- production of standard SPOT scenes as 1:100,000 paper copiesfor ground verification;

- geometric precision correction of imagery;

- production of computer compatible tapes (CCT);

- contrast enhancement, the production of mosaics registered tothe existing map system and division into 1:50,000 map sheets;

- production of 1:50,000 paper copies of satellite image maps.

12. Ground verification fieldwork was undertaken in each segment byIRA. It was undertaken by two teams, each with a senior researcher and atechnician after standareizing the field procedures, and recordingmethods. The field observation and recordings were usually done alongtransects pre-determined in order to traverse the different tonalvariations depicted on the imagery, with detours to investigate anyunique tones appearing off the transect. The field recordings were madeon a transparent overlay fixed on the 1:100,000 field images. A total ofseven land cover/vegetation types and 23 sub-types were used as per Table2. The field work for ground verification was not completed until August1989 due to the delays in acquiring imagery and weather constraints.

13. After fieldwork visual interpretation of the images wasundertaken by the same team of four from IRA. Selected groundinformation points were transferred from the field images to the mapsheets at scale of 1:50,000. Extrapolations were subsequently made tocover the rest of the map sheets. The rest of the points were reservedfor accuracy estimation. Overlays were then prepared from the 1:50,000map sheets showing the land cover types. Finally the areas of land covertypes thus mapped were determined and the maps drawn to the final stage.

Results

14. The results of the study are a set of 174 imagery maps withoverlays at a scale of 1:50,000 (see the overlay folders) and thestatistics of the area coverage of each of the land cover vegetationtypes mapped in the study area. The area coverage data for each overlayis compiled separately in Annexes 1 through 4. Area coverage data foreach segment is summarized in Chapter VI.

The Use of SPOT Imagery Data

15. Consideration was give. to the use of aerial ph-tography andother types of remote senseJ imagery. However, it was determined thatSPOT imagery would provide the spatial resolution needed for theinterpretation required most cost efficiently.

16. There were some difficulties associated with using SPOT data.Best results can only be achieved through a careful consideration of theseasonal effects on the image interpretability. This is largelyinfluenced by cloudiness, the phenology of the local vegetation and, toan extend, the land use activities of an area. These factors influencethe image interpretability either by obscuring the tonal visibility or byaffecting the background contrast of the land cover categories beingmapped.

17. The effect of clouds on the acquisition of SPOT imagery dataduring the preferred period of time is clearly illustrated by theexperience of this study. It had been planned that data should beacquired during 1987. But this was not possible due to the predominanceof cloudy conditions in certain areas. This meant therefore that imagesof all the segments could not be delivered in one lot delaying the fieldwork in more distant segments such as Arusha and Tabora-Mwanza.

18. There may also be problems in interpretation caused by imageprocessing and the presence of different tones for a given type after theimage sheets are made into a mosaic. There were also some problems ininterpreting roads, mainly due to a seasonal lack of background contrast.

19. The above are minor problems associated with using SPOTimagery. However, the use of geometrically precision corrected SPOTimages was found to be an easy way of constructing maps with goodgeometry. The use of precision corrected images eliminates the need forsophisticated interpretation equipment. The geometry of even the non-corrected standard scenes is acceptable for many uses. The methods andequipment used in this study were simple and within reach by mostinstitutions in the developing world. A combination of goodunderstanding of satellite image interpretation, good knowledge of localterrain, climate and vegetation phenology, and basic cartographicmaterials are the only requirements to produce land resource maps ofacceptable quality. The maps produced under this project may be used forreconnaissance level inventory of woody biomass for woodfuels and otheruses, as well as to provide a basis for strategic planning of thewoodland resources, particularly the woodfuel resource.

- vi -

Table 1. The Legend used in the main study

CATEGORY LAND COVER TYPES

I FOREST (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn)

2. Mangrove Forests (Fn)(m)

3. Forest Plantation (Fp)

11 WOODLAND (W). 4. Dense Woodland (Wd)

S. Open Woodland (Wo)

III JUSHLAND (B): 6. Thicket (T)

7. Dense Bushland (Bd)

B. Open Bushaland (Bo)

IV GRASSLAND (G): 9. Open Grassland (G)

10. Wooded Grassland (Wg)

11. Bushed Grassland (Bg)

V MBUGA (M): 12. Mbuga with grass (Mg)

13. Mbuga with scattered bush (Mb)

14. Mbuga with scatteredcultivation (Mc)

VI CULTIVATION (C) 15. Open cultivation (c)

16. Cultivation witn treecrops (Ct)

17. Cultivation and bushremnants (Cb)

18. Cultivation and treeremnants (CT)

VII ESTATES (E) 19. Estates (E)

Vill OTHERS 20. Urban settlement (U)

21. Bareground (Bag)

22. Salt Bareground (Bags)(s)

23. Grass and oare rock (Gbr)

24. Open water (Ow)- - -------- __ -- _________ - -- - - ------ _____

I. INTRODUCTION

Background to the Project

1.1 This is a report for the joint World Bank/UNDP Energy SectorManagement Assistance Program (ESMAP) on the mapping of natural woodlandsin Tanzania using SPOT satellite data. The study covers four areasnamely: the Dar es Salaam, Iringa, Tabora - Mwanza and the Arushawoodfuel catchment areas. (see Fig.l). Details of these areas arepresented in Chapter II of this report. The areas covered by this studyare important woodfuel target areas for either urban supply, the tobaccoindustry or both.

1.2 The production of satellite image maps and vegetation type mapoverlays in this project is a preliminary step for a woody biomassinventory of the areas concerned. This inventory will involve limiteddestructive sampling methods to establish relationships betweenutilizable biomass and measurable parameters and subsequent non-destructive sampling using the regression equations so established.Details of species composition for the different land cover types willalso be generated. The information accumulating from all these taskswill form the basis for systematic programs to upgrade the management ofthe peri-urban woodfuel sources and those in the tobacco growing areas.This report is concerned with the production of vegetation type maps withparticular emphasis on those which are sources and potential sources ofwoodfuels.

1.3 There is evidence showing that during recent years, there hasbeen extensive deforestation throughout Tanzania. This land degradationprocess, during the last two decades or so, has been caused by, amongmany other factors, land clearing for both small and large scale farming;procurement of biomass energy for processing agricultural products (e.g.tea and tobacco), and for domestic and industrial consumption;procurement of building materials; clearing vegetation during tsetse flyeradication programmes; and bush fires. These factors have, to a largeextend, been influenced by the high rate of population growth during thelast two decades. The high rate of urbanization, too, (see Table 1) hashad extensive impacts on the peri-urban environments, at least partiallydue to the ever increasing woodfuel (charcoal) demands. In addition, thevillagization programme of the 1970's has significantly affected villageenvironments by intensifying pressure on land and woody biomass resourcesby concentrating a large population of people and livestock in specifiedland areas (Kikula, 1986).

- 2 -

Figure 1: Segmental Coverage with SPOTSAT Over Tanzania

E 30e 32- 34e 36 40 o E

UGANDA

0 so 160 -''-km

R W A N D A ' -#/. *i toria.

B~~ ~S M nU K IE N Y A

SEGMENTyMss

KWANZA~M ZA BIU

V? SEGMENT39t~ 359 gU<

- nternational bounday aZ A I \&.;Janganlka . SEMENT ,,MEN0@TW_S%n 362W 6-36

36- --362- - RO__c----X~oo O-A ,- Zubar

3Mad 701136 inl,

Railway -^ (0 j

NATURAL WOODLANDS ASSESSMENT

Segmental coverage with SPOTSAT data i. /dover Tanzania _ M

-3-

Table 1:

Population Projections for the Four Target Urban Centres1986 - 2006

1986 1996 2006 Growthrate S

Dar es Saleam 1,496,000 3,054,700 6,237,596 7,4

Dodoma 794,000 305,778 537,357 5.8Mwanza 258,469 747,233 2,160,251 11.2Arusha/?oshi 349,838 512,595 751,501 3.9

-------------------------------------------------------- _-----

Source: UNOP/World Bank ESMAP (1987)

1.4 Generally, the Tanzanian Government and aid/donor agencies areaware of the seriousness of the various environmental degradationprocesses including deforestation. Resulting from this awareness theEnergy Assessment Report on Tanzania (UNDP/World Bank, 1984) reiteratedthat degradation of woodlands due to production of woodfuels wasparticularly severe in areas around the main urban centres and thetobacco producing parts of the country. The report also stressed that,on a national level, there was a gap between the level of woodfuelsconsumption and sustainable supply. When reviewing the report, theGovernment of Tanzania (GOT) and the interested multilateral/bilateralorganizations reached a consensus that there was an urgent need toformulate and implement comprehensive woodfuel development strategies forboth the needs of the major urban centres and the tobacco producingregions of Tabora and Iringa. Subsequently the GOT presented in 1986 aformal request for assistance to the joint UNDP/World Bank Energy SectorManagement Assistance Program (ESMAP). The requested assistance was tobe implemented in two phases: First to examine issues and optionsregarding woodfuel supply and demand for the major urban areas (mentionedabove) and the tobacco producing regions of Iringa and Tabora. Thisphase culminated in an interim report (UNDP/World Bank ESMAP, 1987).Phase Two of the assistance was to involve the preparation of atechnically and economically feasible project incorporating the morepromising options for alleviating the woodfuel supply constraints in theafore-mentioned areas.

1.5 The ESMAP interim report of 1987- was an outcome of the workdone by a mission in October 1986. The mission identified the need forupdating the information on the nature and extent of tree biomassresources in the peri-urban and tobacco growing areas. The first step inthe process was to involve the use of satellite remote sensing methods togenerate up-to-date mapping and stratification of vegetation by treebiomass density types within the identified land cover types.

- 4 -

1.6 In order to understand the extent and quantity of thesustainable woodfuel supply and to effectively plan for and manage thewoodlands on a multiple-use basis, up-to-date woody biomass data wasessential. Where it exists at all, it was based on inventories of a fewlocalized areas which were done more than a decade ago. For example, theforest inventories supported by the Canadian International DevelopmentAgency (CIDA) for Tabora, Kilimanjaro, Mtwara, Tanga, and Kilimanjaroareas were carried out between 1971 and 1973 (CIDA, 1973). Jaakko Poyry,a Finnish Company, carried out two industrial forest inventories, one inMorogoro-Handeni areas and the other in Amani, Tanga (Jaakko Poyry).More recently Finnida supported inventories o the high forests of theUsambaras mountains mainly for timber production (Finnida, 1988).

1.7 These past inventories were general industrial forestryenumerations and not designed specifically for total usable biomass. Thenature and age of the data renders it inadequate for planning thesustainable utilization of the woodland resources, in which woodfuelswould play a predominant role.

1.8 Thus this study was commissioned whereby the Swedish SpaceCorporation was contracted to provide SPOT satellite images and imagemaps and the Institute of Resource Assessment (I.R.A.) of the Universityof Dar es Salaam, was contracted to prepare the land cover/vegetationoverlays for the maps using the imagery and ground verification. Themaps were then to be used by an inventory team which will assess thewoody biomass in the areas covered by the proiect.

1.9 Much more recently the ETC Foundation (1987) prepared a biomassmap for the nine SADCC countries based on 8 km AVHRR data. The study wasundertaken in the period from December 1985 to March 1987. It wascommissioned by the SADCC Energy, Technical and Administrative Unit (TAU)and jointly financed by E.E.C. and the Royal Netherlands Covernment. Theother recent study is the ESMAP biomass mapping project for Africa Southof the Sahara which used 8 km AVHRR data and was carried out by ETC (UK)in collaboration with Reading University. Comments on the results ofthese two studies will be made below, but it should be mentioned herethat, limitations not withstanding, remote sensing is a powerful tool forthe planning and management of land resources. Specific to biomassassessment, advantages of satellite data include the following:

(a) It facilitates the relatively fast production of vegetationinformation given the broad synoptic coverage.

(b) The large synoptic coverage may reduce the costs per unit areaof assessments.

(c) Multi-temporal analysis is possible within financiallimitations provided acceptable data is available for a basetime frame.

-5-

(d) Multispectral analysis can improve results in certaincircumstances.

(e) Within limitations, there is a reasonable choice for timing theregistration of the images; which may be crucial for accurateinterpretation.

1.10 There are, however limitations to the technology. Some of thelimitations, with particular reference to SPOT satellite data will bediscussed in Section Four.

Overview of Remote Sensing for Vegetation Mapping in Tanzania

1.11 There has been many studies on vegetation mapping using variousremote sensing techniques in Tanzania. The choice of the type of remotesensing technique employed is influenced by many factors, some of whichare outlined below, but not in any particular order of significance.

1.12 The type of job to be done will definitely influence theresolution requirements. Through the years there has been improvement inthe resolution of the satellite imagery as illustrated in Fig. 2. Theseimprovements have added to the useful options for satellite data.

Fig. 2: Improvements in the Resolution of Satellite Imagery

x Landsac MSS(80 m)

Landsat TM(30 m)

.2 SPOT (20 & 10 m)v x

1972 1982 1986Y EARS

1.13 Size of the study area, time available for the study, fundsavailable and manpower are all important considerations influencing thechoice of remote sensing technology. But, in many cases the availabilityof data is one of the most important factors. Data which is easilyavailable gets used more frequently.

1.14 In the paragraphs that follow below we shall briefly review theuse of remote sensing in vegetation mapping in Tanzania, and we startwith the traditional form of remote sensing, namely aerial photography.Like many other parts of the world, aerial photographs have had the long-est and widest use primarily so because they have been around longest.

j

1.15 The topographic maps (compiled from aerial photos) coveringmost parts of the country at 1:50,000 scale indicate the generalvegetation types to be found in the different localities at the time ofphotography. But most other uses of aerial photographs have been forspecific jobs and they include those by Groome (1945) in Tabora; Aderson(1968), Spooner and Jenkin (1968) in Kilimanjaro and Mgeta; Herlocker andDirschl (1972) and Herlocker (1976) in Serengeti and the NgorongoroConservation Area; Christiansson (1972) and Christiansson (1981) inCentral Tanzania; Kikula (1979 and 1986) in Mufindi; and Cook (1974) inRufiji. Aerial photography is very flexible regarding choice of scaleand flight planning. It also gives a more detailed view of the groundrelative to the scale of the photography and particularly so understereoscopic interpretation. For thematic mapping of vegetation, as inthis case, information from the infra-red and colour spectrum is in manyrespects more valuable than geometric detail. Normally, aerialphotography uses black and white films, although colour and even infra-red is used on a number of occasions for special purposes. Both Landsatand SPOT provide the colour and infra-red option as well as panchromatic(black and white), though the SPOT infra-red spectrum is more limitedthan that of Landsat with no thermal infra-red capacity (refer Figure 6).

1.16 Aerial photos are normally interpreted in stereo pairs toobtain a three-dimensional image. This is an advantage forinterpretation, but, on the other hand, it requires special instrumentsAnd trained staff. The central projection, peripheral aberrations andthe varying scale of an aerial photo 1/ also means that the transferringof the interpretation results to the scale and projection of a map is nota straight forward job. For the present exercise the option of aerialphotography was not considered because, given the size of the study area(about 140,000km2 ), it would have been prohibitively expensive fordetails which are not essential. We are dealing with a low valueresource which does not justify a heavy investment such as aerialphotography over the entire study area. There is the possibility thoughthat limited aerial photography could be used as part of a three-phasesampling approach; the third phase being ground surveys.

1.17 The lack of synoptic coverage would have presented problemsboth during selection of sample sites and during the gathering of groundinformation. The analysis of photos covering the entire study area wouldhave taken considerably longer than that required for satellite imageryand the production of maps from photos is also a much more protracted

1/ Caused by changes in attitude and mountainous terrain.

-7-

affair. Also given the segmented and irregular nature of the studyareas, the logistics of aerial photo coverage would have beendifficult. It therefore, follows that satellite data was the obviouschoice. But even with satellite data there were a number of options,namely Landsat - MSS1, Landsat - TM, SPOT and meteorological sateltitedata.

1.18 Generally the advantage of using satellite imagery in mappingof larger areas is that the number of images needed to cover the area isgreatly reduced. In this study, covering some 140,000 sq.km., 174 imagemaps corresponding to the existing topo maps were cut out from the mosaicof 41 satellite scenes. At the same scale, about 600 aerial photos wouldbe needed to cover the area. The smaller number of images reducehandling time and costs, and it is also one of the factors why theinterpretation work generally is faster using satellite data.

1.19 The decisive difference between aerial photography andsatellite data is, in many cases, the data acquisition costs. It isdifficult to make an exact comparison due to uncertainty in many of theparameters necessary for photo coverage, such as mobilisation costs,field logistics and seasonal weather variations. However, estimates forEast Africa are about US$10 per square kilometre for black and whitephotography at a scale of 1:50,000. Colour or infra-red would cost more,mainly due to increased film processing costs. The cost for satellitedata acquisition differs between the types, but it stays below US$2 persq.km., i.e. less than 20Z of b/w air photos.

1.20 As aircraft operating and staffing costs are major factors, andaerial photography is often restricted due to weather, cloud and hazeconditions to a limited period of the year, an attempt to fly aerialphotography with poor results will almost double the costs for dataacquisitions if the team has to return the next season to complete theacquisitions. The satellites, on the other hand, are continuouslycircling the globe and programming for acquisition of data can easily beswitched on and as many times as necessary until the right quality ofimages is acquired.

1.21 Landsat - MSS data has been extensively used for vegetationmapping in Tanzania. Examples include the Rukwa Region vegetation map(Kikula, 1979), Tabora Region vegetation map, the vegetation map ofTanzania by Okello (1984), Ngorongoro vegetation map (Kikula 1979 andMisana 1989), Mbeya Region vegetation map (Kikula 1979 and Misana 1985)and many other examples. Lack of consideration of the Landsat - MSS inthis study was mainly influenced by the course resolution anduncertainties of getting images for the desired season at relativelyshort notice. Similar reasoning worked against the option of Landsat- TMdata. Although the resolution of Landsat TM (30 m) approaches that forSPOT's multispectrum data (20 m) it was felt that better resolution wasnecessary to help stratify vegetation types. As is mentioned below, therevisit capabilities of SPOT were an also important consideration,particularly given the limited desirable period and the cloudiness ofsome sectors such as Dar-es-Salaam and Arusha.

- 8 -

1.22 The desired scale of mapping was 1:50,000. This, therefore,automatically disqualified the possible use of weather satellite imageswhich are available at very course resolution, (1 to 8 km). The latestvegetation maps covering Tanzania were produced by the ETC Foundation(1987) and ETC (UK) (1989) in collaboration with Reading University. Thedata used for the studies were acquired by the Advanced Very HighResolution Radiometer (AVHRR) aboard the American meteorologicalSatellite NOAA-7 launched in January 1971 (currently non-operational).The ground coverage of the NOAA-7 satellite images is 2700km and theground resolution 1.1km to 8km. AVHBR data are aimed at themeteorological community, but can be used for biomass mapping based onthe Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) which is calculated asfollows:

NDVI = Channel 2 - Channel 1

Channel 2 + Channel 1

1.23 The basis for determining the NDVI values is vegetationproductivity which does not distinguish woody from non-woody vegetationand cultivated (eg. large plantation) from natural vegetation. The firstof the aforementioned studies based on AVHRR covered the nine SADCCcountries while the second one covered the whole of the African regionsouth of the Sahara. It will probably be clear here that the choice ofthe satellite technology was dictated both by the economics and the sizeof area covered. It is quite understandable, therefore that the resultscould at best only be at rather general level (scale 1:5,000,000 for thesecond study). Nevertheless, the results give a useful base andexperience from where more details should be developed. Moreover theresults provide a regional overview which could be useful for decisionmakers at regional or higher levels.

1.24 As mentioned earlier, this mapping project is based on SPOTsatellite data. SPOT - 1 was launched from French Guyana on 22.2.1986.SPOT - 2 was launched in early 1990 and SPOT - 3 is planned for 1991. Asecond generation of SPOT satellites i.e. SPOT - 4 and SPOT - 5 willfeature in the 1990s. Fig. 4 shows a typical SPOT satellite. Thedecision to undertake the SPOT program was made in 1978 and it is beingundertaken by France in association with Sweden and Belgium. France owns90%, Sweden 6Z and Belgium 4Z. The system comprises the spacecraft andan image reception and processing unit. Fig. 3 gives the location ofSPOT receiving stations in the world. It is probably curious to notethat the whole of southern Africa would be covered by the South Africanreceiving station but for political reasons, many of the southern Africancountries would be reluctant to order data from that station.

1.25 fun important factor influencing the choice is the commercialrather than the experimental "image" attached to the SPOT program rightfrom the start. But the desired scale of 1:50,000 and the high resolutionwere the two most important factors which influenced the use of SPOT

DACCA. Bangladesh

KIRUNA, Sweden ISLAMABAD. Pakistan PEKING. China

PR!4CE ALBERT, Canada GATINEAU. Canada TOULOUSE. France RIYADH. Siudla Arabia HATCYAMA. Japan

60

'-4

".4

OpQtaliOnal a ~~~~CUlABA IBrazil PRETORIA. South Attica |ALICE SPRINS, Australiaunderationatulio uncier coslructionMASPALOMAS. Spain HYDEPABD, India

planned O

- 10 -

data. The program is the first to include a Linear array of sensors andemploy a broom scanning technique. Coverage characteristics of the SPOTsatellite are shown in Fig. 4. The unique system of pointable opticsfacilitates revisit coverages during satellite passes and allows forstereoscopiz pairs of images of a particular area (See Fig. 5). Morefeatures oi SPOT compared to LANDSAT are presented in Table 2 and thereflectivity characteristics of the different satellite bands for turbidwater, vegetation and soil is presented in Fig. 7. An understanding ofthese reflectivity characteristics forms the basis of interpretation ofthe images.

TABLE 2: C0IWPARATIVE CiARACTERISTICS OF LAND RESOhURCE SATELLITES

SATELLITE ALTITUDE IMAGE WIDTH RESOLUTION BANDS (Microns)(KM) (Pixels)

SPOT-i 832 60 XS 20M XS1 a 0.50 - 0.59XP iOM XS2 a 0.61 - 0.68

XS3 a 0.79 - 0.89XP = 0.51 - 0.73

LANDSAT-1 & 2, 3 907 185 80. MSS4 a 0.50 - 0.60*MSS) (79X56) MSS5 = 0.60 - 0.70

MSS6 a 0.70 - 0.80MSS7 u 0.80 - 0.10

(RBV) 907 185 80m RBVI a 0.475 - 0.575RBV2 a 0.580 - 0.680RBV3 - 0.650 - 0.830

LANDSAT - 4 705 185 30M TMI = 0.45 - 0.52& 5 (TM) TM2 = 0.52 - 0.60

TM3 a 0.63 - 0.69Th4 - 0.76 - 0.90TM5 * 1.55 - 1.75TM6 = 2.08 - 2.35

(Thermal) 120m TM7 = 10.40-12.50

MSS = Multispectial ScannerR9V = Return Bean VidiconXS a I4ultispectialXP * PanchromaticTM a Thermal

- 11 -

Figure 4: Coverage Characteristics of SPOT Satellite

HRV Instruments

H RV 1 <.B.>t HRV 2

117 km

60 k3

3 km

- 12 -

Figure 5; Revisit Capabilities

Passes on Days:

0+10 D+5 D 5b

Equator

Figure 5a and 5 b - Revisit Capabilities

Blue IGreenl Red rVEGETATIONI.l | I OILS

e- I I I\ -\

olu Turbid |t

EC U VISIBLE REFLECTED INFRARED THERMAL INFRAREDhi 004 0 06 0 0 1-0 Io1- 1-2 1- IIS '-1 l-S 24 -5 33S0 *- s0 - 0- - 11.0 - 40 Nl@& I I I II IIl:u'T jnNA AVHURR Wo LOnger 'eond (en micro)ns

§ ° _ |L4 LA5 |"L 27 l I4vTIMTIPETRAL N_E_

' ' X .1 D : l1.1

u SPOT HIGHkES r{ NONV *LE%titbp.ral

-04

- - -…~~~~~~~(NOA A,NESDIS, AISC, 1`986) modi-fied

- 14 -

1.26 From Table 2 and other considerations the main alternatives forvegetation mapping at scale of 1:50,000 to 1:100,000 are themultispectral (colour infra-red) data from SPOT XS or Landsat TM.Although it is debatable, in our opinion, tha optimal scale forinterpretation of TM data is 1:100,000 and for SPOT data 1:50,000.

1.27 The main advantages of Landsat TM data are that the acquisitioncosts are lower per area unit and that information from middle infra-redwavelengths is recorded. The middle infra-red bands are less haze-sensitive than the visible lands and they are valuable for distinguishingbetween different forest types.

1.28 The Landsat satellite also has a shorter cycle time. Any areaon earth is passed over every 16th day compared to every 26th day forSPOT. However, the side-looking capabilities of the SPOT instrumentsmakes it possible to cover a desired area at the equator every 7th day.As figure 5 illustrates, this side-looking capability increases as oneapproaches the poles.

1.29 It is evident from Table 2 that the SPOT programme has anadvantage over the early generation of Landsat satellites particularlywith regard to resolution. It also covers a fairly broad range of theelectromagnetic spectrum, though it has only near infra-red capability,and it does have the enhanced revisit capability attributed to its side-looking capabilities.

1.30 The main advantage for SPOT XS data is the higher geometricresolution, 20 metres compared to 30m for Landat TM. This provides moretexture information and allows for more detailed delineations and greaterstratification of ground cover types. The added information on roads andother infrastructural features is of great help for orientation in theimages, both during interpretation and field work. For field work, thisis especially important in areas where the maps are old or otherwise ofbad quality.

1.31 During the process of producing the image material for thisstudy, a great advantage of the SPOT system was found in the integrationof the whole data processing and map production procedure, most of ittaking place in the same building. Programming of the satellite,acquisition of data through the on-board tape recorder, evaluation of theacquired data and adjustments in the satellite programming, as well asthe production of the delivered image material was easy to follow up andcontrol. This integration is also of great value in reducing the timespent in each step of the procedure.

Terms of Reference

1.32 The main features of the terms of reference are summarized asfollows:

- 15 -

1.33 Aim of the study. The aim of the study, "Assessment ofWoodfuel Resources in Tanzania using Satellite Remote Sensing" is tosupport the two UNDP/World Bank Energy Sector Management AssistanceProgram (ESMAP) pre-investments in Tanzania:

- Energy use in the Tobacco Industry

- Urban Woodfuels Supply

Both of the above require the use of remote sensing for the assessmentand mapping of available woodfuel resources. SPOT satellite data is tobe used to map land cover in the areas of investigation. The end productof the study is ground cover type maps which will be used as a basis fora subsequent woody biomass inventory aiming at the assessment ofavailable woodfuel resources.

1.34 Area of investigation. The area of investigation includes themain woodfuel catchment areas around Dar es Salaam, Mwanza, Shinyanga,Tabora, Iringa and Arusha as per Table 3. The location of the SPOTscenes used is shown in Fig. 1. Each SPOT scene covers 60 x 60km(3,600km') on the ground. The total area covered by the study istherefore approximately 140,400 sq.km.

Table 3: SPOT Scenes and Map Sheets Required per Location

Location Number of Number of Map sheetsSPOT Scenes at scale 1:50,000

Dar es Salaam 16 64Mwanza/Shinyangas/Tabora 15 71Iringa 2 8Arusha 6 28

TOTAL 39 171

1.35 Scope of Work. SPOT imagery was to be used to map land covertypes with relevance to woody biomass densities. Multispectral andcolour infra-red images were to be used for this purpose. Satimage(Swedish Space Corporation) was responsible for imagery data acquisitionand production of SPOT scenes and maps while the Institute of ResourceAssessment, University of Dar es Salaam (IRA) was responsible for groundverification field work, image interpretation and the production ofoverlays. The study was to be carried out according to the followingsequence of events: SPOT programming (data acquisition and tapegeneration); production of uncorrected images for field use; field workfor ground verification; precision correction and contrast enhancement ofimages; production of satellite image maps corresponding to the Tanzania1:50,000 map sheets; visual interpretation of land cover classes; andproduction of overlays showing the interpreted land cover classes. A

- 16 -

report was to be prepared providing technical descriptions of themethodology and the results of the mapping. However, before themethodology was finalized, a pre-study was done in June 1987. A formalcontract was signed on the 24th Nov. 1987.

II. AREAS COVERED

2.1 The study covers four areas namely, the woodfuel catchmentzones for Dar es Salaam, Iringa, Tabora - Mwanza and Arusha segments asindicated in Fig. 1. The choice of the areas was made on the basis oftwo criteria: The potential and actual woody biomass source areas forthe major urban settings in these areas and woody biomass source areasfor the tobacco industry in Tabora and Iringa Regions. These areas wereconsidered to locations where heavy exploitation of the woody biomassresource, coupled, in some cases, with destruction of the resource foragricultural or animal husbandry purposes, was creating a sustainablewoodfuel resource deficit situation. They are not the only areas wheresuch a deficit could occur, 2/ but, in an agreement between GOT andESMAP, it agreed these would be the subject of a program to alleviatewoodfuel shortages.

2.2 The biomass productivity of the existing peri-urban and tobaccogrowing areas is likely to continue declining. Table 4 shows thewoodfuel supply deficits occurring in the Mwanza-Shinyanga-Tabora, Arushaand Dar es Salaam woodfuel supply areas. Major development andmanagement of the woodfuel resource base in all the study areas is judgedto be necessary, (ESMAP, 1988). The principal development thrust shouldbe in the existing woodlands with development and implementation ofmultiple-use management plans a key objective of the proposedWoodfuel/Forestry Project. The biomass data, which should be establishedwith the help of this remote sensing and mapping study will form animportant input during the planning stages of the project. In theparagraphs the follow below, we will briefly describe the areas coveredin the study.

The Tabora-Mwanza Segment

2.3 This segment, like the Dar es Salaam one, covers an extensivearea. It includes the area from Nzega northwards through Kahama toBiharamulo. Eastwards the segment extends to about Sengerema, while inthe west it extends to Urambo and Kaliua. The segment covers areas oneither side of the roads between Nzega-Tabora, Tabora-Sikonge, Tabora-Urambo, Urambo-Kaliua, Nzega-Kahama, Kahama-Biharamulo, Biharamulo-Mulebaand Biharamulo-Geita-Sengerema.

2/ Other woodfuel deficit areas could include the woodfuel catchmentsaround Tanga, Mbeya and Dodoma.

- 17 -

Table 4: DEMAND-SUPPLY ESTIMATES FOR WOOOFUEL/FORESTRY PROJECT AREAS(million m3 solid)

Sustainable PotentialWoodfuel Catchment Demand Supply I/ Deficit

(Regions) 1987 2000 2000 1987 2000,1 1 1

Arusha 2.3 3.6 3.0 1.6 2.0Oar os Salaam/Pwani 4.9 9.6 8.2 6.6 b/ 3.0Mwenza-Shinyanga-Tabora 9.1 13.5 4.4 5.3 c/ 8.2

a/ Includes village and farm wood.b/ Includes 10 percent of Morogoro Region's sustainable supply0/ Includes 20% of Kagora Region's sustainable supply.

2.4 Given the extent of the segment, there is a big variation inthe environmental attributes. The description that follows may thus berather general, but enough to give an impression of the areas beingconsidered.

2.5 Generally, rainfall in the area occurs between November andApril with a December and February/March maximum. However, thesepatterns are extremely variable. To the east of the segment is the semi-arid zone (i.e. with rainfall equal or below 800mm per annum) which runsnorthwards just east of Nzega. According to the Atlas of Tanzania thereare three locations within the segment with a mean annual rainfall ofOOOmm. They are the area between Tabora town and Mambali, the area

around Kahama, and just south of Biharamulo. For the rest of the area therainfall is between 800mm and 2000mm.

2.6 Miombo vegetation in its different variations covers thelargest part of the segment. It is claimed by Lawton (1979, 1980) thatlarge areas of miombo have only been abandoned by cultivators within thelast 100 years, probably as a result of a decline in the use of thecaravan trade routes, but also due to the spread of bovineTrypanosomiasis from the south and later, in the 1930's, to humansleeping sickness which caused much of the area to be evacuated.Establishment of forest reserves helped to ensure that the bulk of themiombo remained uninhabited.

2.7 A number of other vegetation communities are to be found in thedrier East and North East. These communities include Acacia/Combretumwoodlands, bushlands and bush grassland. The latter communitiescorrespond with a relatively drier climate. They also occur in areaswhere the destruction of miombo has been so severe that they tend not toregenerate. These are areas which have been zleared, browsed burnt andextensively grazed for many years. Also isolated patches of Combretum

- 18 -

woodland occur frequently on uplands where they appear to be secondaryformations resulting from cultivation on infertile soils. It issuggested that some of these areas covered with bushland and bushgrasslands were formely woodlands in which Acacia, Combretum andCommiphora species were dormant. Areas with similar woodlands stillexist. Civen their origin, the species composition of these communitiesis variable. Examples of these areas are in Nzega District. Remnantsalso occur in other areas of the segment, in most cases asso-iated withhills of banded ironstone.

2.8 Within the woodland zones, there is a succession from deciduousbroad-leaved thickets or woodland on shallow soils of hills and ridgecrests through Acacia spp. woodland on the deeper soils below to Acaciadrepanolobium bushland or bushed grassland in the mbuga. Commiphoraspecies are widespread throughout the Acacia woodlands. Areas withCommiphora woodland are to be found on soils over hard pan and massiveironpan.

2.9 The vegetation of the lowlands or mbuga's includes woodedgrassland and grasslands made up of tall course grasses with a variablescattering of trees often concentrated around termite mounds whereaeration, soil composition and soil structure is favourable to treegrowth due to termite activity. These areas are extensive within themiombo, occurring on valley floors and floodplains. Mbuga grassland isinvariably flooded for long periods within the wet season.

The Arusha Segment

2.10 The Arusha segment extends from just north of Kondoa townthrough Babati, east of Lake Manyara, Monduli, Arusha and South of Moshitown beyond Nabereva in Kiteto District. The segment followsapproximately the main road to Arusha and to Kibaya, covering extensiveareas on either side of the road.

2.11 Due to high relief, the area around Babati receives a meanannual rainfall of about 1000mm. For the surrounding areas, up to aboutLake Manyara, the mean annual rainfall is between 800 and 600mm. Most ofthe eastern leg of the segment receives a mean annual rainfall of between600 and 500mm. The segment straddles an extensive area with diverse landunits which support a highly diverse vegetation occurring in intricatepatterns. Some of the vegetation communities occur in complexes ratherthan as pure types.

2.12 Woodlands are typically on mountains and hills. Open thornbushland is common; particularly north of Babati and on the eastern sideof the segment. These bushlands are interspersed throughout withgrasslands and wet grassland which commonly occur on gentler relief anddepression areas associated with drainage patterns.

2.13 South of Babati, woodlands (miombo) occur on hills and they aremainly forest reserves. They are often inaccessible because of the

- 19 -

topography. These woodlands are dominated by Brachystegia speciformisand Schlerocarya caffra. Associated species are Commiphora schimperi, C.fischeri and Euphorbia candelabrum. Further north, more Brachystegiaboehmii starts appearing.

2.14 Patches of upland dry fcrest are scattered in different partsof the hills. The common species are Ekbergia sp. Pygenum africanum andAlbizia gummifera.

2.15 The thorny bushlands are dominated by Acacia tortilis andCommiphora schimperi. Other shrub species are Acacia seyal, A.drepanolobium, A. stuhlmanii and Balanites aegyptica. Terminaliasericea, T.- kilimand-scharica and Osteryoderris stuhlmanii are alsoimportant species in the bushland.

The Dar-es-Salaam Segment

2.16 The vegetation of the Dar es Salaam segment, also reflects theinfluence of variations in relief, soils, rainfall and, of course, theimpact of human activities. Along the Indian Ocean shoreline, mangrovesare often encountered, inhabiting inter-tidal muddy swamps, creeks anddeltas. On the wet coastal plain and the plateau surfaces lying furtherinland, cultivated formations of tree crops (principally coconut palms,cashew, mangoes, and citrus) predominate around settlements, and alongthe main transport routes. Elsewhere, where influence of humanactivities has not been as significant, formerly extensive areas ofnatural forests, woodlands, bushlands and thickets have been altered intovarious degraded formations. Natural forests, woodlands, bushlands andthickets are restricted to the less accessible localities (e.g. dissectedhilly terrain) or where they are protected by law.

III. METHODOLOGY

3.1 In order to achieve the objectives outlined under section 1.3above, logistical, and methodological considerations demanded that anexploratory study precede the actual vegetation mapping in the targetareas. Such a "Pre-study" was required in order to determine the mostappropriate way of carrying out the main study.

Pre-study and Development of Methods:

3.2 The Pre-study, which was undertaken in May and June, 1987 hadthe following objectives:

(a) To set up the methodology for the full scale study and definethe landcover/vegetation strata that should be measured inorder to assess woodfuel supplies.

- 20 -

(b) To determine the sampling intensity of the ground verificationrequired to achieve the accuracy needed ir the mapping of thedifferent woodfuel sources, and to prepare a field strategy forthe full scale study.

(c) To make an assessment of the best combination of interpretationmethods for the full scale study.

(d) To determine the best period for registration of SPOT data bycomparing data registered at different dates.

3.3 Details of the pre-study work, together with its findings andrecommendations are contained in the report by Bystrom et al, (1987) andKikula et al; (1988). We shall therefore, in this report, only give abrief outline of what the prestudy involved and its results.

The prestudy proceeded as follows:

(a) Selection and production of available spot images for the testareas. Five SPOT images, two for the Tabora area (132-360,133-360) and three for the Iringa area, (139-364, 139-365, 139-366) were used, because they had already been acquired at thetime of the pre-study. From these scenes, standard IB1:100,000 paper prints were available for use in the field andfor visual interpretation.

(b) Definition of preliminary sampling procedures andlandcover/vegetation types, and the undertaking of fieldworkfor ground verification.

3.4 Before sampling, the field team (Drs. Kikula and Shishira andMr. Karberg (contracted by SATIMAGE)) briefed the relevant regionalofficials about the objectives of both the prestudy and the main study.The actual sampling was concentrated along motorable routes whichdetermined the main sampling transects in the selected areas of study.However, where necessary, detours by car or on foot were made to specificpoints of interest. During sampling, tonal signatures on the imagerywere continuously related to actual ground observations, and assigned tothe respective land cover type. Notes were made on an overlay and theprepared proforma. Ground photographs were also taken for referencepurposes. In addition to the general land cover recording alongtransects, special sampling in selected woodlands and bushlands wasundertaken for purposes of relating biomass and the tonal signatures ofthe imagery. Woodland and bushlands were used for such a correlationbecause they are the main sources of woodfuel for rural and urbanpopulations. Fourteen 20 x 20m quadrats were located in woodland andeight in bushland. The plots were marked on the imagery.

- 21 -

Digital classification

3.5 One of the objectives of the pre-study was to make anassessment of the best combination of interpretation methods for the fullscale study. Therefore, in addition to the visual interpretation,digital classification was also tested. Two areas were selected. Theywere chosen as representative areas of the Tabora and Iringa regionsrespectively, each covering 400 sq km.

3.6 Based on interpretive data on the land cover/vegetation types(eg. woodland, bushland etc.) from the field work, training sites wereselected for the computer classification. The procedure, "maximumlikelihood classification," discriminates objects with different spectralresponse ('colour' for the human eye). Twelve training types wereoriginally selected for the classification. The training types werelater concentrated, so that the final map contained only 3 types:

(a) woodland

(b) bushland

(c) other (cultivation/grassland/bare soil).

3.7 In the digital test, vegetation index maps were also created,one for the Tabora and the other for the Iringa area. The vegetationindex is based on the theory of spectral reflectance of vegetation in thered and the near-infrared wavelength. The vegetation index is computedas a ratio of red to near infrared reflectance in the image. High valueson the vegetation index map correspond to dense vegetation covers, andthis is usually highly correlated to biomass.

3.8 In an attempt to further increase the classification accuracy,the type map and the vegetation index map were combined into one map. Torestrict the number of types in this map, the values of the vegetationindex map were merged into three classes: low, medium and high.

Output

3.9 The resultant imagery contained four images from each of thetwo regions, Tabora and Iringa:

(a) original SPOT data

(b) classification map

(c) vegetation index map

(d) combined map

- 22 -

Type Map

3.10 The area was divided into 3 types:

(a) woodland - dark green

(b) bushland - light green

(c) open areas - yellow

Vegetation Index Map

3.11 The vegetation index was coloured with black/dark green huesfor areas with a low amount of biomass and light red hues for areas ofhigh biomass. Since background such as soil/bedrock and sun angle arescene dependent, the vegetation index values could not be comparedbetween Tabora and Iringa.

Combined Map

3.12 Prior to the combining, the vegetation index map was dividedinto three classes of biomass; low, medium and high. The combination issimply the classification multiplied by the vegetation index, resultingin 9 classes, each of the three type classes being divided into threebiomass classes.

Visual Interpretation

3.13 The visual interpretation was done by two senior image rnalysts(Drs. Kikula and Shishira) sitting side by side around a light table tofacilitate a dialogue. The delineation was done by extrapolatingboundaries from known spectral signatures previously verified in thefield. A larger number of the sample areas with known signatures weresaved during interpretation for the purpose of assessing the mapaccuracy.

3.14 A complete visual interpretation of scene 132-360 (Tabora west)and part of scene 139-365 (Iringa North) was done to provide an exampleof the results to be expected during the main study.

3.15 The types used during the pre-study were as follows: densewoodland, open woodland, bushland, thicket, wooded or bush grassland,mbuga grass.land, mbuga cultivation, mbuga with bushland, forestplantation, cultivation, scattered cultivation with bushland andcultivation with tree crops. A few more items had to be added to thelegend of the main study to accommodate the range of land cover typesencountered in the whole of the study area (See Section 3.3).

- 23 -

Review of pre-study results and definition of methodology for the fullscale study

3.16 The main results and conclusions based on the pre-study aresummarized below:

3.17 Digital classification. Although the appearance of theclassification maps was convincing, they were impaired by a large numberof errors. The discrimination of bushland from woodland was found to beextremely difficult in most areas, due to similar spectral properties.However, the discrimination of open areas from bushland/woodland hold asufficient degree of accuracy, roughly 80Z.

3.18 The accuracy of the vegetation index is much more difficult toestimate. A relationship between field-measured woody biomass and thevegetation index was found in the Tabora area, but the correlationcoefficient was rather low. Furthermore, the accuracy changes with theregion and season of the year. It was recommended on the basis ofaccuracy, the number of mappable types and costs that no digitalclassification be carried out in the full-scale project and, that themapping of land cover types be made with visual interpretation incombination with extensive field work.

3.19 Visual interpretation. The various land cover categoriesobserved on the ground could be correlated with tonal signatures on SPOTimagery (better so with SPOT false colour composites than with thepanchromatic imagery, despite the higher spatial resolution of thelater). Even at the scale of 1:100,000 it was quite possible, using thecontrast enhanced colou:r prints, to relate land cover and the tonalsignatures. Thus, since the main study was to utilize imageryenlargements at the scale of 1:50,000, it was expected that it would bepossible to delineate even smaller units. With regards to the comparisonbetween panchromatic and the colour images it was noted that the formerwere particularly useful for mapping road network. There were also othercases (e.g. distinction of open bushland and mangrove for the coestalvegetation) where the panchromatic was better than the colour images.Boundaries of a number of land cover categories appeared clearer onpanchromatic than colour. However, an overall assessment based on adelineation of details on the imagery showed quite distinctly that thecolour images were superior. The interpretation accuracy in the Taboraarea was calculated to 95Z. The accuracy in the Iringa area was notdetermined due to the limited field data, but it was judged to beslightly lower due to the complexity of land cover types. To summarise,the results of the pre-study clearly showed that it was possible to mapmore land cover types using visual interpretation than through digitalclassification, and that the types so interpreted agreed well with anexisting system for classifying East African rangelands, Pratt et al:1966.

3.20 Even though more classes were delineated through visualinterpretation, the calculated overall accuracy of the mapping was

- 24 -

significantly higher than for the computer-based methods evaluated.Visual interpretation is less sensitive to the presence of haze andscattered clouds in the imagery, as the interpreter can, in many cases,conclude what kind of land cover is present in the obscured patches byextrapolating from the surrounding areas and by using other data sources.

3.21 No complicated and expensive equipment is required for thevisual interpretation work. As described above, when comparing satelliteimagery and aerial photos, it is even simpler than using air photos.

3.22 The visual interpretation work could be carried out byavailable Tanzanian staff having long-term experience, both in imageryinterpretation and field verification. It is also rather easy to trainadditional staff needed for a mapping project. The techniques of visualinterpretation are already widely spread in many tropical countries. Theinformation from the study will thus be generated and presented insidethe country itself. At the same time, the cooperation with SSC Satimageenables the highest sophisticated computer and photographic enhancementtechniques to be utilized for production of the best possible imagery forthe interpretation.

3.23 Timing of registration. The best time for registration of SPOTdata for the areas to be covered by the main study was found to be theperiod between mid October and mid December, November being the optimumtime. These late dry season images show more variation than the dominantpink and reds of the wet and early dry season images. This variation inthe late dry season images is caused by the contrast between trees withnew leaves and the dry grassland areas and bare fields. This isparticularly the case in Miombo woodlands. Similar observations were madewith landsat MSS images by King (1984). It was recommended therefore,that the SPOT satellite be programmed for registration of the targetareas, mainly during this time period. A less favourable alternative wasApril/May, when trees would be in leaf, but crops not showing to anyextent at the end of the principal wet season. Cloud cover can be amajor problem at this time though.

3.24 Field Procedures. Field observations and recordings made alongtransects defined by motorable roads and tracks speedily yieldedsufficient data for the land cover mapping exercise and should thereforebe adopted for the main study. However, vegetation sampling for biomassassessment should be undertaken later, as a separate exercise, after theland cover mapping has been accomplished - thus providing the necessaryspatial frame work for the biomass sampling. The fiel! samplingundertaken during the pre-study was too time consuming and too inaccuratewithout establishing reliable tree-weight regression equation andsufficient stratified sampling of parameters such as crown diameter, treeheight and/or butt diameter.

- 25 -

Image Acquisition, Processing and Delivery

General Production Procedure

3.25 The diagram below describes the steps of the procedure at SSCSatimage to produce the imagery used in the project.

3.26 The programming of the SPOT satellite and the acquisition ofdata started in the dry season of 1987 (i.e. some months before thefinalization of the contract between the World Bank and SSC Satimage on 3November 1987).

3.27 In the the contract, it was foreseen that all SPOT data neededshould be acquired before the wet season starting December 1987. It was,however, not possible to cover all the areas within this period due tocloud conditions. As the chances of getting cloud-free coverage variedaccording to the climate in the different areas of the project, it wasdecided that the remaining imagery should be delivered area by area tothe IRA. The execution has therefore been a continuous process where theproduction and delivery of imagery was dependent on the reception ofcloud-free data. In this way the work could continue in a parallelfashion in Sweden and Tanzania and the time needed for completionreduced.

3.28 The final delivery of imagery to the IRA was completed inAugust 1988 for the Mwanza/Tabora and Iringa areas, in December 1988 forthe Arusha area (which was amended to the contract in March 1988) and inMarch 1989 for the Dar es Salaam area.

3.29 All products, both from the IRA and SSC Satimage, are deliveredto the World Bank/ESMAP on completion of the entire project. The varioussteps of the production procedure are described in more detail in thefollowing.

SPOT Programming and Data Acquisition

3.30 In total, 39 completely cloud-free SPOT scenes were required tocover the entire project area. According to the contract 51 scenes couldbe used, the extra scenes complementing partly cloudy scenes. Due to thecloudy climate particularly in the coastal area, and because theacquisitions were continued throughout the rainy season, 570 scenes hadto be acquired and evaluated between October 1987 and December 1988before data of acceptable quality covering the entire project area couldbe extracted.

- 26 -

Figure 7: Production Procedure at SSC Satimage

SPOT Programming

Data Acquisition and Evaluaton

Computer Compatible Tapes (CCTs)

/ | ~Geometrical Precision Coffcon.|

Contrast Enhancement

Mosaicking

Division into Map Sheets

SPOT XS Scenes as SPOTXS Scenes as | Satelfte Image Maps asPaper Copies 1 :100,000 Computer Compatible Paper Copies 1:50.000

for Field Work Tapes (CCTs) for Interpretiort

- 27 -

3.31 The programming of the SPOT satellite was continuously adjustedso that scenes were acquired only over areas not yet covered by cloud-free data. To get as frequent acquisitions as possible, the side-lookingcapability of the SPOT satellite was fully utilized. The mirrors of theHRV instruments were tilted up to the maximum 23 degrees to cover theproject area when passing over areas on either side, (ref. Figures 6a and6b).

3.32 As different parts of Tanzania have very different cloudoccurrence, the probability of getting cloud-free data variesaccordingly. The areas with a marked dry season, Iringa and Tabora, werealready completely covered by the end of November 1987, as was the areanear Mwanza at the start of the dry season the following year.

3.33 The most severe cloud problems were experienced in the coastalarea around Dar es Salaam, which did not see any truly cloud-free seasonduring the entire duration of acquisitions. After consultations betweenthe World Bank, IRA and SSC Satimage, it was decided to end the imageacquisitions on 30 December 1988 and complete the mapping with the dataavailable, although this did not meet the standards regarding absence ofclouds set up for the other areas within the project. Acknowledging thefact that the expected quality of the imagery could not be reached in theentire area, SSC Satimage used more SPOT scenes than specified in thecontract to produce additional Satellite Image Maps, thus giving amaximum of cloud-free quadrants on the images. Also four completelycloud-free panchromatic scenes were delivered at a scale of 1:50,000 tobe used for reference where the multispectral imagery was obscured byclouds. In the end the result was limited cloud cover on some maps, butthis did not unduly hinder interpretation.

Production of Imagery

3.34 To enable an early start of the field work, standard SPOTcolour images on cibachrome material was produced from the digitalimagery at a scale of 1:100,000. Radiometric calibration was applied toeach image, but without any geometric corrections. This kind of imageryhad proved to have sufficient quality to be used in the field, and itcould be produced quicker than the Satellite Image Maps which were usedfor the interpretation.

3.35 For the production of Satellite Image Maps, the digital SPOTimagery was first precision corrected geometrically to the existing1:50,000 topographic maps covering Tanzan5s. To fully utilize Xhepotential planimetric processing system at SSC Satimage, maps at a scaleof 1:10,000 or larger should be used for control point collecting. Whenusing maps at a smaller scale, the precision arrived at is more anindication of the quality of the maps than of the SPOT scene.

3.36 The same ellipsoid (Clarke 1880) and projection (TransverseMercator) as in the Tanzania map system was used for the correctedimages. About ten control points for each scene were identified on the

- 28 -

maps and used to establish the new geometry. These included sharp riverconnections, shoreline features and road intersections. The RMS error inthe control points was normally around 20 m, the extreme 11 and 49 mequivalent to 0.22 - 0.98 mm at the scale of the map.

3.37 Using the side-looking capabilities of the SPOT satellite, asdescribed above, has the disadvantage of causing relief displacementbetween higher and lower altitudes within an area. In the extreme case ofa viewing angle of 23 degrees and an altitude difference of 1400 m, thedisplacement of a mountain peak is approximately 6 mm on a scale of1:50,000. The corresponding displacement of an altitude difference of500m is around 2 mm, while on the vast plains with almost flat land thereis no displacement as is also the case in the scenes with a verticalviewing angle. For the thematic mapping in the present project it wasconcluded that the effect of small displacements of mountain peaks isnegligible compared to the advantage of getting more frequentacquisitions.

3.38 The next step in the production of Satellite Image Maps wasinteractive contrast enhancement of the digital imagery using a colourmonitor calibrated to agree with the outcome from the later photographicprocesses. Each scene was individually colour balanced, taking intoaccount factors such as seasonal effects and atmospheric conditions, tooptimize interpretability of the land cover types of relevance for theproject. For other applications, e.g. interpretation of agricultural orurban features, the optimal enhancement would be different. This processwas facilitated by the experience gained by SSC Satimage personnel takingpart in the field work for ground verification in Tanzania.

3.39 The contrast enhanced scenes were then mosaicked together anddivided into Satellite Image Maps which were rectified to the earthreference system used in Tanzania and adjusted so as to correspond to theTanzanian map system; all of this being done digitally. As the imageryshould primarily be used for interpretation, the non-uniform appearanceof adjoining scenes in some of the map sheets, due to the individualcolour balancing, was regarded as less important.

3.40 Finally the 1974 Satellite Image Maps were reproducedphotographically at a scale of 1:50,000. Cibachrome material, which issubject to minimal distortions due to temperature and humidity, was used.

Mapping Classification

3.41 The main land cover categories and definitions of the types arebased on the classification of the East African Rangeland provided byPratt et al; (1986). However, some modifications were made to fit thespecial objectives of the present work, and to incorporate experiencegained during fieldwork. The map types used are given in Table 5 anddefinitions are given below. Altogether, seven (7) land cover categories(groups) and twenty three (23) constituent "types" were identified in thetarget areas.

- 29 -

Table S. The Legend used In the main study



2. Mangrove Forest (fn)(m)


11 WOODLAND (W): 4. Dense Woodland (Wd)

5. Open Woodland (Wo)

Ill BUSHLAND (B): 6. Thicket (T)

7. Dense Bushland (Bd)

S. Open Bush Iand (Bo)



11. Bushed Grassland (Bg)

V NJGA (M): 12. Mbuge with grass (Mg)




16. Cultivation with treecrops (Ct)



VII ESTATES (E) 19. Estates (E)

VilI OTHERS 20. Urban settlement (U)


22. Salt Bareground eiags)(s)

23. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)

24. Open water (Ow)

- 30 -

3.42 The following are simplified definitions of term.s in the legendshown in Table 3. The definitions are adopted from the classification byPratt et al (1966).

(a) FOREST (F): Tree cover with closed canopy of one or more strata.Three types of forest were distinguished:

(i) Natural Forests (Fn): Lianas and epiphytes are common.There may be a dense undergrowth of herbs and shrubs wherethe canopy is not dense enough to exclude light. Where lightis excluded, characteristically, grass are sparse andlocalized. No distinction was made between Montane,Riverine and other types of high forescs etc.

(ii) Mangrove Forests (Fn(m): An association of physiologicallyspecialized plants inhabiting muddy swamps, creeks, deltasand sheltered shores along tropical sea coasts, periodicallyinundated by tides. Mangrove forests may be closed or openand they can be either pure or consist of a mixture of twoor more species. Mangroves along the East African Coast maycontour up to nine species belonging to six families.

(iii) Forest Plantations (Fp): Includes all categories ofartificial forests.

(b) WOODLAND (W): An assemblage of trees with a canopy cover ofmore than 20Z. The canopy may be continuous, but not thicklyinterlaced. Grass and herbs dominate the ground cover. Twotypes of woodlands were distinguishable on the imagery:

Wi) Dense woodland (Wd): Refers to woodland with canopy coverof more than 50%. Ideally a medium dense woodland categoryshould have been included in the legend, but identificationof the category on the imagery was found to beinconclusive. The category was therefore merged with densewoodland.

(ii) Open woodland (Wo): Refers to woodland with canopy cover ofless than 50%.

(c) BUSILAND (B): An assemblage of shrubs, (below 4m height)mostly multistemmed, with a canopy cover of more than 20%.Three types of bushlands are distinguishable on the imagery.

(i) Thicket (T): A closed and impassable assemblage of shrubs.

(ii) Dense bushland (Bd): Refers to bushland with canopy coverof above 50Z. Similar to the woodland a medium densebushland category should have been included in the legend,but identification of the category on the imagery was foundto be inconclusive. The category was therefore merged withdense bushland.

- 31 -

(iii) Cpen bushland (Bo): Refers to bushland with canopy cover ofless than 50%.

(d) GRASSLAND (G): Land dominated by grassland and occasionallyother herbs; sometimes with widely scattered or grouped treesand shrubs, the canopy cover of which does not exceed 2%. Inthi3 study, the category is distinguished as land cover type 9i.e. open grassland. Where the tree or shrub canopy is between2-20%, two other categories are distinguished depending on thehabit of the woody component:

(i) Wooded grassland (Wg): Scattered trees with canopy coverbetween 2-20%

(ii) Bushed grassland (Bg): Scattered shrubs with canopy coverbetween 2-20X. Distinction between Wg and Bg highly dependson ground information.

(e) MBUGA (M): A Tanzanian term for a low flat grassy plain of"black cotton" soil with impeded drainage. Three land covertypes are distinguished under this category:

(i) Mbuga with grass (Mg): This is essentially grassland withina mbuga.

(ii) Mbuga with Scattered bush (Mb)

(iii) Mbuga with Scattered Cultivation (Mc): This is essentiallycultivation within a mbuga.

(f) CULTIVATION (C): Areas of farming. Distinction is made asfollows:

(i) Open Zultivation (C): land dominated by pure food cropcultivation.

(ii) Cultivation with tree crops (Ct): land dominated by treecrops.

(iii) Cultivation and bush remnants (Cb): Cultivationinterspersed with stands of bush.

(iv) Cultivation and tree remnants: Cultivation interspersedwith trees which were left behind during clearing of thefarms.

(g) OTHERS: This category includes those which could not be fittedin any of the foregoing categories. They include:

- 32 -

(i) Urban Settlement (U)

(ii) Bareground (Bag): This could be a result of landdegradation processes; human activities, or naturalprocesses.

(iii) Salt Bareground (Bag(s)): This category covers saltybareground, which is mainly along the coast and normallyinterspersed with mangrove vegetation.

(iv) Grass and bare rock (Gbr): These are large rock outcropswhich are partly covered by grass while other portions arebare rock outcrops.

(v) Open Water (Wo): Water bodies.

Fieldwork.

3.43 The ultimate objective in undertaking the field work was togain understanding as to how the various tones and patterns appearing oneach SPOT image related to actual land cover and constituent typesobserved on the ground. Through such correlations associating specificland cover types with characteristic tones and patterns on spot imagery,extensive mapping is possible by means of SPOT imagery interpretationbased on a sample of typical land cover types encountered in the field.

Timing of fieldwork.

3.44 There were two factors which largely determined when fieldworkcould be undertaken: the weather patterns prevailing in the targetareas, and availability of a complete set of SPOT imagery covering eachof the areas. The target areas normally experience two distinct seasons;a wet season extending from December to May (but with a dry spell inJanuary and February) and a dry season extending from June to October.Fieldwork could only be undertaken during the dry season because theareas became inaccessible during the wet season. Further, costconsiderations dictated that each of the four target areas (i.e. Dar esSalaam, Tabora, Iringa and Arusha) could only be visited once. Thereforeit was considered important that a complete set of imagery for each ofthe target areas be acquired, in the first place, before setting out intothe field area. This condition determined the order in which the targetareas were field-surveyed (i.e. Iringa first (May 1988), followed byTabora (Jul;' 1988), Arusha (February 1989), and finally Dar es Salaam(August, 1989). Fieldwork covering three images of the Dar es Salaamsegment was done in June 1988. The rest of the images were not availableat that time.

Fieldwork Procedure.

3.45 Field investigations in each of the four target areas werecarried out in two stages following as a result of lessons learnt during

- 33 -

the pilot phase. We will describe below the preparations which had to bedone for fieldwork and the actual work in the field.

Preparation for fieldwork.

3.46 This phase included the collection of existing informationabout the field area (in particular, maps), and planning of fieldsampling and traverse routes so that a range of terrain conditions interms of land cover types could be covered. The work progressed in stepsas follows:

(a) A survey of available literature and collection or relevantmaps was made. The information gathered was to serve threepurposes:

- to make the participating researchers aware of theconditions in the field areas,

- For use in planning of fieldwork.

- For use together with ground information gathered duringfieldwork in the visual interpretation of SPOT imagery andmapping of land cover types (see 3.5)

(b) The 1:100,000 SPOT colour prints covering the entire field areawere laid down as a mosaic to provide a map of the area thatgave an overview of the whole segment, thus providing a basisfor determining field transects.

(c) On the basis of existing maps all roads and tracks werecarefully marked on transparent overlays. The resulting patternof possible transect routes was an extremely importantconsideration in planning fieldwork.

(d) A preliminary visual interpretation of the SPOT images wasmade, making full use of the information referred to in (i)above and the experiences of the pilot phase. The interpre-tation focused on image patterns and their constituent tonalelements in an attempt to assess variations and to selectprovisional sampling areas.

(e) A tentative fieldwork itinerary was prepared.

(f) The regional officials in the field areas were contacted andinformed of the planned visit.

3.47 Work in the field area. The survey team consisted of tworesearchers Drs. I.S. Kikula and E.K. Shishira and two techniciansMessrs. F.A. Msuya, and S.K. Kajula, all from IRA, University of Dar esSalaam. Mr. B. Paulsson from Swedish space corporation, Kiruna, parti-cipated in the field survey of Iringa and part of the Dar es Salaam area.

- 34 -

3.48 On arrival at the field area the field team met with therelevant regional/district officials and briefed them on the objectivesof the field survey as well as on objective and scope of the mappingproject as a whole. It was important that these officials be informed ofwhat was going on because the irformation being sought in this studywould be of interest to them as planners and decision makers in therespective target areas. Moreover, their cooperation was vital for thesuccess of the fieldwork.

3.49 Having briefed the various regional and district officials, thenext task was to establish convenient station(s) where the field team wasbased, and from where daily trips into the field area were made. At thestation, the 1:100,000 SPOT images were again arranged to form a mosaic,providing a map of the field area. The motorable roads and trackspreviously marked on print overlays and intended to constitute possiblesampling transects, were re-examined, and a working itinerary reviewed.

3.50 The first eight days of the fieldwork were devoted to the"standardization" of procedures, observations and annotations of thefield observations. This process was done in the Iringa area along thetransects in one vehicle with all the team members so as to standardizethe fieldwork procedures given that the crew was to later on be dividedinto two sub-teams. At the end of the standardization process, there wasa discussion session to discuss any doubts that might have remainedregarding the field procedures, observations and annotations. The fieldteam was subsequently divided into two sub-teams (each consisting of aresearcher and a technician), and each sub-team was assigned daily routesin accordance with the set itinerary which was reviewed daily beforestart of fieldwork in the light of fieldwork progress to date.

3.51 The task of each sub-team was to travel along the assignedtransects (and of course, to make detours to specific points ofinterest), make observations, and record land cover types. Navigationwas facilitated by the SPOT imagery at hand, and it was done verycarefully so that at any time, the exact position of the team wasknown. In some cases topo maps had to be used for orientation. Thus,along each transect tonal signatures on the imagery were continuouslyrelated to actual ground observation and assigned to the respective landcover type (see section 3.3 above), and the land cover type symboltogether with other notes, printed (on the transparent overlay) againstthe locality of the observations. The actual routes followed betweenobservations were also marked on the overlay, together with mileages tomark points where observations had been recorded, thus providing a cross-reference with the rest of the features appearing on the imagery. Wherenecessary, ground photographs were also taken for reference purposes.

3.52 Wnen ci;e allowed, during the evenings, members of the two sub-teams gathered at the base station to exchange the experiences of the dayand discuss the following day's traverses. The day to day experienceswere later to be summed up at the field team's general meeting which was

- 35 -

normally held at the end of fieldwork for each segment before departureto the next area. On the whole, it was possible to achieve theobjectives of the field survey in the target areas. However, a number ofproblems were encountered:

(a) Delay in undertaking fieldwork. Piactically all the fieldworkcould have been undertaken within a single dry season if therewere not the inconsistencies in the delivery of materials andimagery. Because of delays in imagery delivery the work had tobe spread over two years.

(b) Difficulties in relating tonal signatures on imagery to actualobservations on the ground. This was largely due todeficiencies in some of the imagery supplied, which did notallow for clear contrast to be made among the featurespresent. This deficiency was particularly notable for any wetseason imagery, 3/ and it was exacerbated by the fact that theappearance of the features appearing on the wet season imageryhad to be matched with a different appearance of the samefeatures on the ground during the dry season when the fieldsurvey was undertaken.

(c) On some of the field imageries, it was impossible to identifyroad networks making orientation in the field difficult. Insuch circumstances topo maps and physical features had to beused for orientation.

(d) Delay in the progress of field surveys due to bad roads. Someof the roads encountered during fieldwork were among the worstthat may be found anywhere. It was only by the use of 4 wheeldrive vehicles equipped with winches that access was gained tosome areas which were targeted for sampling.

Visual Interpretation Of The 1:50,000 Map Sheets, Preparation ofOverlays, and Area Measurements.

3.53 The pre-study work (see 3.1 above) which formed the basis ofthe visual interpretation approach for the present work, had demonstratedthat such interpretation was capable of producing results with anaccuracy as high as 95Z. Attainment of such a high level of accuracydraws much from sound knowledge of field conditions and experience inmatters of imagery interpretation. Thus it was important that visualinterpretation in the present study was undertaken by the same fourpersons who had done the fieldwork in connection with this study, and whoalso happen to be experienced imagery interpreters. Although this meant

3/ Because of persistent cloud cover during the optimum registrationperiod (late dry season) some imagery was acquired in the early orlate wet season, December or May.

- 36 -

slow progress, it was compensated for by the high accuracy. Visualinterpretation work for each of the four study areas commenced soon afterfieldwork in the area was accomplished and while field conditionsexperienced were still fresh in the minds of the interpreters. Theprocedure was as follows:

(a) The set of 1:50,000 scale colour images (also referred here as"map sheets") for a given area were laid down as a moasaic toprovide a 1:50,000 map of the area. The purpose was to gain animproved synoptic view of the entire area and to see how toneson the map sheets to the adjoining images. Starting from oneend of the lay-down the whole team of four worked with one mapsheet after another for a week. This was deliberately done tostandardize the procedures for interpretation andannotations. After this initial stage the team was againrandomly sub-divided into two sub-teams. This time the sub-teams were not permanent as in the case of fieldwork. Finally,each team member worked individually. But the final interpre-tations were checked, and if necessary, amended after a reviewby the whole team. Supplementary information from varioussources was used where necessary.

(b) Reference was made to the 1:100,000 images used in the fieldand the ground information recordings printed thereon. Thefield traverse routes were retraced on the overlay covering the1:50,000 map sheet, and a1l lines of communications (includingroads and tracks) visible on the 1:50,000 imagery weresimilarly traced.

The ground information points recorded in the 1:100,000 fieldimages were transferred on to the 1:50,000 map sheets. At thisstage only up to 10% of any one land cover's ground informationpoints were used as reference points during interpretation.The rest were reserved for accuracy estimations as stated understep (iv) below. On the whole, for the different scenes, thepoints reserved for accuracy estimation ranged from 98 to 50%depending on the complexity of the image.

(c) On the basis of imagery interpretations through extrapolationof the ground information points, the boundaries of land covertypes of the whole map sheet were mapped.

(d) Accuracy assessment: It has been mentioned above (see (ii)that the ground information points reserved for accuracyassessment ranged from 98 to 50%. The accuracy assessment wasdone to give an indication of the reliability of the mapsproduced. Some of the ground information points were excludedbecause of the uncertainty of their location on the imageriesespecially where the roads could not be accurately marked onthe field images. The accuracy was calculated by comparingthe final map with the ground information points reserved for

- 37 -

the purpose. The accuracy assessment chosen indicates thepercentage of points on the map sheet mapped correctly comparedto the ground conditions.

The assessment was done for each sheet separately. The rangeof the accuracy was between 78.62 and 89.8%.

The mapping approved by the four image interpreters wasconsidered final and the process was systematicallyrepeated on adjoining map sheets until the whole area wasmapped. The overlay maps were retraced neatly by acartographer.

(e) Area measurements of each of the mapped land cover types weremade a using digital planimeter. This process took longer dueto the limited number of instruments.

(f) Map sheets at a scale of 1:50,000 with corresponding overlaymaps were finally submitted to the World Bank/ESMAP

IV. SPOT DATA AS A )'ASE FOR VEGETATION ANALYSIS IN SUBSAARAUN AFRICA

4.1 Countries in Sub-Saharan Africa and of course many others inthe developing world have much to benefit from SPOT satellite data. Thisis in view of the fact that large areas of this part of the world eitherstill remain unmapped or the maps are old and completely out of date.Thus there is potential for SPOT satellite data to be used both inmapping and monitoring programmes. In the sections that follow below weoutline some of the factors which influence the utility of the facility.

Seasonal effects

4.2 The effects of seasons on the image interpretability isfundamental to the successful and fast interpretation of satellite databe it Landsat or SPOT. Images have to be taken during that part of theyear when there is maximum differences in the reflective signatures ofthe land cover types. In a large country with wide differences inclimate, vegetation types and the corresponding phenology, the choice forthe best season for image coverage has, of necessity, to be sitespecific. It follows therefore that a good choice of images has to bebased on a clear understanding of the prevailing local conditions.

4.3 Experience shows that the best timing for imagery acquisitionfor vegetation mapping, is when the woody vegetation is still with greenleaves while the grass and other similar land cover types are dry. Thisgives a good background contrast to the woodlands or forest thusfacilitating accurate type mapping. Obviously there will be differenceswithin the woody vegetation category based on differences in densitiesand these will be reflected on the image by tonal differences and

- 38 -

variation in texture. In most of the miombo (Brachystegia-Julbernadia)zones these conditions are met during the late dry season. EitherSeptember or October seem to be optimal depending on the local rainfallregimes as illustrated by Figs 8 (for Lumbe), 9 (Ulowa) and 10(Urambo). It will be noticed that Lumbe does not normally havesubstantial rains in October, while the case is different for Ulowa andUrambo.

4.4 The phenology of miombo vegetation has puzzled scientists forsometime, but it is now fairly well established that the differentBrachyste8ia species flush new leaves before the onset of the rains.Exact timing of the new leaves flush vary from one place to anotherprobably influenced by the relative soil moisture conditions, andtemperatures. Cenerally, therefore, the woody miombo vegetation willhave new leaves while the background remains dry giving a good contraston the images. The different vegetation types do have the same tone inthe mid dry and wet seasons, making interpretation difficult.

4.5 In this study it was clearly observed that images acquiredunder the stated conditions were more multicoloured and displayed moreinformation than the dominant pinks and reds of the wet and early dryseason colour composites. King (1984) using Landsat MSS in Tanzania hadsimilar observations. However, associated with dry season images areassociated with obtaining good dry season images, there is the problem ofsmoke from burning which obscures the land cover types.

4.6 Linear cultural features, particularly in areas which areintensively overgrazed, are best observed in the early dry season colourcomposites. Under these conditions, there is enough background contrastbetween the roads and the surrounding overgrazed background. Mid dryseason images were also observed to be best for non-miombo vegetation.

Acquisition and Delivery of Data-Conditions and Constraints

4.7 Details of image acquisition and delivery are given above. Inthis section we will only amplify the constraints. It has been mentionedthat it had been planned at the beginning of the study that data shouldbe acquired during the dry season of 1987. It will be noticed in Table 6below that this original plan could not be fulfilled. As has beenmentioned above, the main problem was the exceptional predominance ofcloudy conditions during the project period. These conditions, however,varied in the different parts of the segment. This meant therefore thatimages of one segment could not be delivered in one lot for one timeperiod. For example three images for the Dar es Salaam segment werereceived on the 23rd May 1988. While the final delivery of the remainingimages was not made until March 1989 and even then some scenes could notbe obtained cloud free, despite the fact that quite some latitude wasused as to the time (seasons) when the images were obtained.Consequently, efficient planning of fieldwork was difficult, consideringthat the segments are widely separated; some were quite a distance from

- 39 -

Figure 8: Mean Rainfall - Temperature Lumbe MeteorologicalStation 1977-88

*C 44

>1tA

360-

340.

320-

300-

'250-

260-Rainfall

240- Temperature

220-

200-

*180-

160-

140.

120-

80-

60-

40

20

JAN FES MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

- 40 -

Figure 9: Mean Rainfall - Temperature Ulowa MeteorologicalStation 1977-88

C ¶70

160-

_ _ n Rainfall

120. Temperature

100J

60-

JAN FES MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OC NO 0E

- 41 -

Figure 10: Mean Rainfall - Temperature Urambo MeteorologicalStation 1978-88

'C 200

12l_a taipea

160-

140

- |lRainfall

120 A Temperature

100-

60,

40

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

- 42 -

Table 6: Imagery Acquisition

Scene No. Date of Acquisitlon

ARUSIHA SEGMENT140-359 11.10.88140-358 11.10.88139-357 21.10.88

11.10.88138-359 28.10.88138-358 28.10.88138-357 30.09.88

DAR ES SALAAM SEGMENT

Multispectral Panchromatic

147-367 13.5.88147-366 20.8.88 (Partly cloudy)

18.6.88 (cloudy)15.12.88 (cloudy)

146-367 18.6.88 (partly cloudy)

146-366 18.6.8820.9.88

146-365 15.7.88 1.7.8720.9.88

146-364 24.11.87 (cloudy) 1.7.8710.7.88 (cloudy)15.1.88 (cloudy)

146-363 15.7.88

145-364 25.1.88 1.7.8815.7.88

145-363 25.1.88 1.7.88144-364 25.1.88144-363 25.1.88144-362 25.1.88143-363 1.10.88142-363 23.12.88141-363 3.5.88

16.6.86

- 43 -

Scene No. Date of Acquisition

TAB4RA MWANZA SEGMENT

133-361 25.5.87

133-360 25.5.87

132-361

132-360 25.5.87

132-359 4.5.87

131-361 14.5.87

131-360 14.5.87

131-359 14.5.87

131-358 23.10.86

130-360 22.11.87

130-357 6.9.86

22.11.87

130-356 2.6.88

130-355 2.6.88

129-356 2.6.88

129-355 2.6.88

I R I NGA SEGMENT

139-366 23.10.88

139-365 23.10.88

- 44 -

Dar-es-Salaam. The team had to wait until all the images for the Arushaand Tabora-Mwanza segments were delivered before commencing field work ineach of these segments. This meant considerable delay in the executionof the project. In view of the foregoing it is advisable for a projectsuch as this, to allow enough time for data acquisition.

Cost of Operations and Timing of the Project

4.8 The costs of the project may be placed into three main groups:

(a) The Institute of Resource Assessment project costs;

(b) SATIKAGE (Swedish Space Corporation) project costs; and

(c) ESMAP supervision, materials and equipment costs.

4.9 Each of the above had different but complementary roles in theproject. The role of IRA was to undertake ground verification and toprepare overlays with data and cartography materials made available.RA's cost was US $79,000, excluding data and materials which wereprovided. Included in the costs was $10,000 to meet vehicle runningcosts. SSC Satimage costs to produce the 1:100,000 map sheets and1:50,000 colour enhanced and rectified maps as well as computercompatible tapes was $327,000. ESMAP's costs for materials, equipment(including a 4 wheel-drive vehicle) and supervision amountel to$46,000. Total project cost was $452,000 or approximately $3 per km'.

4.10 At the time of preparing the proposal, it was estimated thatfield work would take seventy team days. However, 123 team days werespent in the field (fieldwork was undertaken by two teams each with twopeople). The original estimates were unrealistic. The original planningdid not take into consideration the poor state of the roads which turnedout to have a significant impact on the work progress. In a number ofsituations, mainly in the Dar es Salaam and Arusha Segments, the poorquality of images required careful and slow observations. To a largeextend this drawback also applies to the overlay preparation.

4.11 Apart from the time spent on the different project activities,time was waisted while waiting for the delivery of images; the delaysbeing due to cloud problems. Delivery of materials from the cartographicmaterials suppliers coupled with World Bank procurement and deliveryprocedures also caused considerable delays.

Analysis: Problems and Prospects Relating to This Type of Remote SensingOperations

4.12 We have summarized in Table 7 our experiences on theinterpretability of the various land cover types from SPOT images.Notable in the table is that the interpretability of the different landcover types range from easy, moderately easy to difficult. Since thefirst part of this section addresses to the problems, we will first

- 45 -

outline contributing factors to the problems of interpretability and thencomment on the prospects.

4.13 Each of the images used in the project was individually colourbalanced (see Section 3.2) in an attempt to enhance interpretability ofthe various land cover types. This meant that sometimes even adjacentimages had different tones. Thus a quick glance at these adjacent imagesmay lead to the conclusion that the two scenes bear different land covertypes. With fieldwork this problem is easily overcome. Neverthelesswhen proceeding from one image to. another mental adjustments arenecessary to be able to make consistent annotations.

4.14 The aforementioned problem is particularly significant in themap sheets (scale 1:50,000) which were in many cases made by mosaichingadjacent scenes of different dates. Big differences in the tones of themosaic images were observed even when the difference in timing was onlyone month. This presents problems during interpretation particularly tothe non-experienced image analysts.

4.15 The visibility of roads on the images is crucial fororientation during fieldwork and even during extrapolation of the groundinformation points, but on a number of cases the road visibility is verypoor due to factors such as:

(a) Lack of sufficient background contrast between the road surfaceand the surroundings. For example due to green grass on thetracks, roads were difficult to see on the end of wet seasonimages. We have also mentioned earlier that roads were notvisible on images taken at the end of the dry season in areasof heavy overgrazing.

(b) Sometimes roads on images were not visible because they ranthrough a dense canopy of woodland.

(c) Occasionally roads had been shifted or new roads constructedafter the publication of the toposheets. There was, therefore,a discrepancy between the toposheet and the images. Thisrequired careful observation to correct location of thetransects.

4.16 The use of images taken at different months from that offieldwork also presents problems. Unfortunately this is probablyinevitable for most projects. This problem can be overcome by eithertiming the image acquisition to coincide with the fieldwork (which maynot be practical) or by the field crew making sure that it constantlykeeps in mind what the land cover 'ype was like at the time of imageregistration. This requires knowledge of the phenology of the localvegetation on a seasonal basis.

4.17 Turning to the prospects of SPOT Satellite technology, onefinds very quickly that the use of geometrically precision corrected

- 46 -

images is an easy way of constructing maps with good geometry. The useof precision corrected images eliminates the need for photographicinstruments. The geometry of even the non-corrected standard scenes isacceptable for many uses (Bystrom and Olsson 1988). The methods andequipment used in this study are simple and within reach of mostinstitutions and persons. A combination of a good understanding ofsatellite image interpretation, good knowledge of the local terrain,climate and vegetation phenology and basic materials are the essentialsfor producir.g land resource maps.

4.18 As has already been mentioned in the foregoing sections theinterpretability of the different land cover types is influenced by anumber of factors which include the timing of the image registration. Itwill be realized that the type of land cover also influences the imageinterpretability. The interpretability of the different land covercategories mapped in this study is summarized in Table 7. Thosecategories indicated as difficult to interpret require more intensivefieldwork. It therefore follows thac in a study like this one, thecategories which are difficult to interpret should proportionally beallocated more fieldwork time.

- 47 -

TABLE 7: LAND COVER INTERPRETABILITY FRCA SPOT IMAGES

INTERPRETABILITY

LAND COVER Easy Modera- diffi- CO4MENTStely easy cult

1. Natural Forest X But may be difficult(Fn) to distinguish riverine forests from swamps

2. Mangrove Forests X May be confused with(Fn(m) Fn if they occur adjasent to each other but tone

differences and occurence of salt bareground areamong the distinguishing features.

3. Forest Plantation X if large(Fp) if small and if within woodland zone.

4. Dense woodland X May be some difficulty in distinguishing natural(Wd) high forest from dense woodland. Distinguished

mainly by tone and location.

S. Open woodland X when not burnt and canopy between 30-50%(We) ----- _-_-_--_____-

X when burnt and canopy between 20-30%

6. Thicket (T) X has a very characteristic tone

7. Dense bushland X When not burnt(*d)

X When burnt

8. Open bushland X When not burnt and canopy between 30-50%(80)

X When burnt and canopy between 20-30%

9. Open grassland(G)

10. Wooded grassland X Depending on the proportion of grass-trees-burning.But with fieldwork interpretability becomes easier.

11. Bushed grassland X _(g9)

12. Mbuga with grass X Position on toposequence and dark soils distinctive

(Mg)

13. Mbuga with scat- Xtered bush (Mb)

14. Mbuga with scattered X field patterns on the mbuga are distinctivecultivation (M-c)

- 48-

15. Cultivation (C) X when not surrounded by open vegetation types

X when surrounded by open vegetation types

16. Cultivation with X For relatively bigger areastree crops (Ct)

X For small areas

17. Cultivation and X Regular shapes inter-persed with reddish tones,bush remnants (Cb) distinctive.

18. Cultivation and X Distinction from eb (where 8 is sparse) needstree remnants (Ct) ground Information.

19. Urban development (U) X

20. Bareground (Bag) X

21. Grass and bare X With some ground information.rock (Gbr)

22. Open Water (Ow) X_~~~~- - - - - - - - - - - _ ___ - - - _______-________- ___

- 49 -

V. THE OVERLAYS

5.1 The purpose of the whole mapping exercise was to produce imagemaps and overlays as well as the corresponding statistics of the areas ofthe various land cover types. The overlays for the different segmentsare arranged and bound together with the image maps in folders.

5.2 It will be noticed that the overlays include landcover/vegetation categories which need not have an obvious significanceas sources of biomass. Examples may include categories like grasslandand even cultivation. The inclusion of these categories, apart fromgiving a more complete map of the land cover types of an area, alsoprovide a visual impression of the dynamics of in a particular area.

VI. RESULTS

6.1 The results of the study are a set of 174 imagery maps withcorresponding overlays at a scale of 1:50,000 (see map/overlayfolders). In addition, there are statistics on the area of each landcover/vegetation type for each overlay as shown in Annexes 1 through 4.These are summarized below for each segmentation. Tables 8 through 11.

6.2 The woodfuel catchment areas supporting the selected urbancenters of Dar-es-Salaam, Tabora, Shinyanga, Mwanza and Arusha are nowmapped sufficiently accurately to enable reconnaissance level woodybiomass inventories to be undertaken and improved management planningcommenced. The maps not only provide up-to-date spatial information onland cover and vegetation, but also on roads and other majorinfrastructure. Thus they may be useful amongst other things for roadand general land use planning.

50 -

TABLE 8: SUH4ARY SHEET

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % ofSegment

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 23818.75 1.23%2. Forest Plantation (Fp) 1625.00 0.08%

SUB-TOTAL 25443.75 1.31SII. WOODLAND(W)

3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 96625.00 4.98%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 260418.75 13.43%

SUB-TOTAL 357043.75 18.41%Ill. USHILAND (8)

5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (8d) 183781.25 9.48%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 183225.00 9.45%

SUB-TOTAL 367006.25 18.93%IV. GLASSLAND (Ge)

8. Open Grassland (G) 158137.5 8.15%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 133662.5 6.89%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 259225.00 13.37%

SUB-TOTAL 551025.00 28.41%V. BUGA (M)

11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 96200.00 4.96%12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) 22106.25 1.14%13. Mbuga Ilth Scattered

cultivation (Mc) 43700.00 2.25%SUB-TOTAL 162006.25 8.35%

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 349393.75 18.02%15. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) 15506.25 0.8%16. Cultivation and bush

remnants (CO) 46018.75 2.37%17. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (CT) - -SUB-TOTAL 410918.75 21.19%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) 1112.5 0.06%19. Bare Ground (Bag) 19418.75 1.00%20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) 1368.75 0.07%21. Open Water (OW) 43887.5 2.26%

SUB-TOTAL 65787.5 3.39%

GRAND TOTAL AREA 1939231.25 99.99%

- 51 -

TABLE 9: SUMMARY SHEET

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) S ofSegment

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 259662.25 5.63%2. Natural Forest (Fn) (m) 70050.00 1.52%3. Forest Plantation (Fp) 3218.75 0.07%

TOTAL FOREST 332931.00 7.22%II. WOODLAND (C)

4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 668043.75 14.48%5. Open Woodland (Wo) 405843.75 8.80%

TOTAL WOODLAND 1073887.5 23.28%Ill. BUSHLAND (B)

6. Thicket (T) 185500.0 4.02S7. Dense Bushland (8d) 369581.25 8.01%8. Open Bushland (Do) 329187.5 7.14%

TOTAL LUSHLAND (8) 884268.75 12.17%IV. GLASSLAND (G+)

9. Open Grassland (G) 17900.0 0.39%10. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 288556.25 6.26%11. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 206437.5 4.48%

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) 512893.75 11.13%V. mbUGA (M)

12. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 92112.5 2.00%13. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) 48987.5 1.06%14. Mbuga with Scattered

cultivation (iMc) 148043.75 3.21%TOTAL MBLUGA (M) 289143.75 6.27%


crops (Ct) 248575 5.39%17. Cultivation and bush

reamnants (Cb) 418443.75 9.07%18. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (Ct) 30523.0 0.66%TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 1025550.0 22.23%

VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U) 18725.0 0.41%20. Bare Ground (Bag) 8962.50 0.19%21. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) 1525.0 0.03%22. Open Water (Ow) 443375.0 9.61%23. Bag (S) 21075.0 0.46%

TOTAL OTHERS 493662.5 10.10%

GRAND TOTAL AREA 4612337.25 100%

- 52 -


AR£A COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT IRINGA

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) S ofSegment area

I. FOR£ST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 6.25 0.01%2. Forest Plantation (Fp) 1156.25 0.21%

SUB-TOTAL 1162.5 0.22II. WOODLAND (W)

3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 62468.75 11.54%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 43825 8.09%

SUB-TOTAL 106293.75 19.63%Ill. BUSHLAND (B)

5. Thicket (T) - -

6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 13937.5 2.57S7. Open Bushland (Bo) 69143.75 12.775

SUB-TOTAL 83081.25 15.34%IV. GLASSLAND (0+)

8. Open Grassland (G) 1031.25 0.19%9. wooded Glassland (Wg) 3912.5 0.72%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 6231.25 1.15%

SUB-TOTAL 11175 2.06%V. iBGA (M)

11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 9200 1.7%12. Mbuga with Scattered


cultivation (Mc) 28543.75 5.27%SUB-TOTAL 39375 7.27%


crops (Ct) - -

16. Cultivation and bushremnants (CB) 105906.25 19.56%

17. Cultivtion and treeremnants (CT) - -SUB-TOTAL 299393.75 55.29%

VI I. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) 1050 0.19%19. Bare Ground (Bag) - -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) - -21. Open Water (C.;) 6.25 0.001%

SUB-TOTAL 1056.25 0.19S


- 53 -


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TA8ORA/MWANZA

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) S of Segmentarea

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 22031.25 0.44%2. Forest Plantation (Fp) 3431.25 0.07%

SUB-TOTAL 25462.5 0.51%II. WOODLAND (W)

3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 1236350 24.78%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 734437.5 14.72%

SU8-TOTAL 1970787.5 39.5%Ill. BUSNLAND (B)

5. Thicket (T) 1718.75 0.03%6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 83725 1.68%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 162775 3.26%

SUB-TOTAL 248218.75 4.97%IV. GRASSLAND (Gt)

8. Open Grassland (G) 3650 0.07%9. Wooded Glassland (Wq) 145600 2.92%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 92256.25 1.85%

SUB-TOTAL 241506.25 4.84%V. IN" (M)

II. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 217468.75 4.36%12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) 230075 4.61%13. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 164456.25 3.3%SUB-TOTAL 612000 12.27%



remnants (Cb) 462056.25 9.26%17. Cultivation and Tree

remnants (Ct) 18543.75 0.38%SUB-TOTAL 1540012.5 30.87%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) 337.5 0.03%19. Bare Ground (Bag) 212.5 0.01%20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) 2693.75 0.03%21. Open Water (OW) 346737.5 6.95%

SUB-TOTAL 349981.25 7.02%


- 54 -

VII. REFERENCES

Bystrom, M. and Stern, M.,Kikula, I.S. and Shishira, E.K. 1987.Assessment of Natural Woodlands in Tanzania Using SPOT Satellite Data -Pre-Study Report.

Bystrom, M. and Olsson, H. 1988. SPOT Satellite data for naturalresources inventories in Zambia-tests from the middle Zambezi and Luangwaareas. Satimage/Swedish space corporation.

CIDA. 1973. Indigenous Forest Inventory of five areas of the UnitedRepublic of Tanzania. Vol. 1-5

Cook, A. 1974. The use of photo-interpretation in the assessment ofphysical and biological resources in Tanzania. BRALUP, University of Dares Salaam, Research Paper No. 31.

FINNIDA. 1988. East Usambara Mountains. Amani Forest Inventory andManagement. Forest Division of Tanzania, Joint Venture, Fiumap-Silvestria.

Hame, T., Saukkola, P. 1982. Satellite imagery in forest tozation inNorthern Finland Research Report 112. Technical Research Centre ofFinland.

Jaakko Poyry. 1978. Report on the Amani Forest Area checking Mission.

Jaakko Poyry. 1978. Report of the Industrial Forest Inventory inMorogoro - Handeni areas, Tanzania.

Kikula, I.S., Shishira, E.K., Paulsson, B. and Bystrom, M. 1988.Defining an inventory system for assessment of natural woodlands inTanzania using SPOT data. Paper presented at the 22nd Int. Symp. onRemote Sensing of Environment, Abidjan, C6te d'Ivoire.

King, R.B. 1984. Remote Sensing Manual of Tanzania LRDC and Institute ofResource Assessment.

Olsson, K. 1984. Remote Sensing of woody vegetation. Rapporter OchNotiser 57. Lund Universitets. Naturgeografiska Institution.

Stronquist, L., Larsson, A., and Bystrom M. (Ed) (1988). An Evaluationof the SPOT Imagery Potential for land resources inventories andplanning: A Lesotho case study. UNGI Rapport Nr 68. UppsalaUniversity.

UNDP/World Bank. 1984. Joint UNDP/World Bank Energy Sector AssessmentProgram, Tanzania. Issues and options in the Energy Sector, Nov. 1984.

UNDP/World Bank - Esmap. 1984. Tanzania. Issues and options in theenergy sector. Report No. 4969 - TA.

UNDP/World Bank. 1987. Urban Woodfuels Supply Study (Phase I) InterimReport.

ASSESSMENT OF WOODFUEL RESOURCES IN TANZANIA

USING SPOT SATELLITE DATA

ANNEXES 1 - 4

ANNEX IPage 1 of 77

r. TABORA-MWANZA SEGMENT AREA STATISTICS

1.1 This volume presents data on the absolute, and relative areacoverages of the various land cover types found in the Tabora/Mwanzasegment. The data is presented in tabular form-each page sheetcontaining data for a named mapsheet area.

1.2 The format of the tables is the same for all of the 71 mapsheetareas covered in the Tabora/Mwanza survey. On the first and secondcolumns of the tables appear names of the major land cover categories andtheir constituent "types", respectively. The third and fourth columnscontain data indicating the absolute area coverage (in hectares) and therelative area coverage (as percentage of the map sheet area),respectively, of each of the named land cover categories and constituentland cover types.

1.3 Brief definitions of the various terms used in the tables todescribe the land cover categories and "type" are given below. Thedefinitions are adopted from the classification by Pratt et al, (1966).

ANNEX 1Page'2 of 77



I FOREST (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn)---------------------------------

2. Mangrove Forests (Fn)(m)

3. Forest Plantation (Fo)

if WOODLAND (W): 4. Dense Woodland (Wd)


Ill SUSHLANO (8): 6. Thicket (T)

7. Dense Bushland (8d)

8. Open Sushaland (80)



11. Bushed Grassland (8g)

V MBEUGA (M): 12. Mbuga with grass (Mg)




16. Cultivation with treecrops (Ct)



VIl OTHEERS 19. Urban settlement (U)


21. Salt Bareground (Bags)(s)


23. Open water (Ow)

ANNhEX IPage 3 of 77

1.4 The following are simplified definitions of terms in the legendshown in Table 3. The definitions are adopted from the classification byPratt et al (1966).

(a) FOREST (F): Tree cover with closed canopy of one or more strata.Three types of forest were distinguished:

(i) Natural Forests (Fn): Lianas and epiphytes are common.There may be a dense undergrowth of herbs and shrubs wherethe canopy is not dense enough to exclude light. Where lightis excluded, characteristically, grass are sparse andlocalized. No distiction was made between Montane, Riverineand other types of high forests etc.



(b) WOODLAND (W): An assemblage of trees with a canopy cover of morethan 20%. The canopy may be continuous, but not thickLyinterlaced. Grass and herbs dominate the ground cover. Two typesof woodlands were distinguishable on the imagery:

(i) Dense woodland COd): Refers to woodland with canopy cover ofmore than 50%. Ideally a medium dense woodland category shouldhave been included in the legend, but identification of thecategory on the imagery was found to be inconclusive. Thecategory was therefore merged with dense woodland.

(ii) Open woodland (Wo): Refers to woodland with canopy cover ofless than 50%.

(c) BUSHLAND (B): A assemblage of shrubs, (below 4m height) mostlymultistemed, with a canopy cover of more than 20%. Three types ofbushlands are distinguishable on the imagery.


(ii) Dense bushland (Bd): Refers to bushland with canopy cover ofabove 50%. Similar to the woodland a medium dense bushlandcategory should have been included in the legend, butidentification of the category on the imagery was found to beinconclusive. The category was therefore merged with densebushland.

ANNEX 1Page 4 of 77

(iii) Open bushland (Bo): Refers to bushland with canopy cover ofless than S0X.

(d) GRASSLAND (G): Land dominated by grassland and occasionally otherherbs; sometimes with widely scattered or grouped trees and shrubs,the canopy cover of which does not exceed 2%. In this study, thecategory is distinguished as land cover type 9 i.e. opengrassland. Where the tree or shrub canopy is between 2-20%, twoother categories are distinguished depending on the habit of thewoody component:


(ii) Bushed grassland (Bg): Scattered shrubs with canopy coverbetween 2-20%. Distinction between Wg and Bg highly depends onground information.

(e) MBUGA (M): A Tanzanian term for a Low flat grassy plain of "blackcotton" soil with impeded drainage. Three land cover types aredistinguished under this category:

(i) Kbuga with grass (Mg): This is essentially grassland within ambuga.



(f) CULTIVATION (C): Ar-as of farming. Distinction is made as follows:

(i) Open Cultivation (C): land dorminated by pure food cropcultivation.

(ii) Cultivation with tree crops (Ct): land dorminated by treecrops.

(iii) Cultivation and bush remnAnts (Cb): Cultivation interpersedwith stands of bush.

(iv) Cultivation and tree remnants: Cultivation interpersed withtrees which were left behind during clearing of the farms.

(g) OTHERS: This category includes those which could not be fitted inany of the foregoing categories. They include:


ANNEX 1Page 5 of 77

(ii) Bareground (Bag): This could be a result of land degradationprocesses; human activities, or natural processes.

(iii) Salt Bareground (Bag(s)): This category covers saltybareground, which is mainly along the coast and normallyinterpressed with mangrove vegetation.

(iv) Grass and bare rock (Gbr): These are large rock outcrops whichare partly covered by grass while other portions are bare rockoutcrops.


ANNEX 1Page 6 of 77

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 62/4MAPSHEET NAME LOBA

…-----__-- _-_- _____- - ___------------------_- _____________________

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) *,' of Mapsheet area

…-----------------------------------------------------------------__-

S. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 87.50 0.11%2. Forest Plantation (Fp) - -

TOTAL FOREST (F) 87.50 0.11%

II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 24268.75 1.79%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 2525.00 3.31%

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 26793.75 35.I1%

rIi. BUSHLAND (9)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 1668.75 2.19%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 3237.50 4.24%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) 4906.25 6.43%

IV. GRASSLAND (68)S. Open Grassland (G) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 468.75 0.61%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) - -

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G*) 468.75 0.61%

V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 1450.00 1.90%12. Mbuga with scattered

bushes (Mb) 2475.00 3.24z4%13. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 1706.25 2.23r%TOTAL MBUSA (M) 5631.25 7.37%

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 27400 35.89%15. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) - -

16. Cultivation and bushremnants (Cb) 10931.25 14.32%

17. Cultivation and treeremnants (Ct) 131.25 0.17%TOTAL CULTIVATION (CC) 38462.50 50.38%

VIl. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag) -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) 18.75 0.0:62X21. Open Water (W) - -

TOTAL OTHERS -GRAND TOTAL AREA 76350 100%

ANNEX 1Page 7 of 77

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 62/2MAPSHEET NAME NTOBO

…___________________________________________________________________LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % of Map

sheet area------------------------------------------------------------------ __-

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 1793.75 2.45%2. Forest Plantation (Fp) - _

TOTAL FOREST (F) 1793.75 2.45%.

II. WOODLAND (W).z. Dense Woodland (Wd) 18462.5 5.26%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 6250 8.55%

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 24712.5 3.81%

IrI. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense B'ushland (Bd) 43.75 0.06%7. Open Bushland (So) 14e1.25 2.03-%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) 1525 2.09%

IV. GRASSLAND (G+)S. Open Grassla?id (G) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 400 0.55%10. Bushed Grassland (8g) 1068.75 1.46%

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G6) 1468.75 2O.01%

V. MBUGA (p)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 4531.25 6.2%12. Mbuga with scattered

bushes (Mb) 675 0.9. 2%13. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 9131.25 12.49X.TOTAL MOUGA (M) 14337.5 19.61,%


craps (Ct) 3500 4.79%16. Cultivation and bush

remnants (Cb) 8700 11.9%17. Cultivation and tree

remnants (Ct)TOTAL CULTIVATION (Ce) 29250 40.02" %

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag) - -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) - -21. Open Water (W) - -

TOTAL OTHERS - -GRAND TOTAL AREA 73087.5 99.99%

ANNEX 1Page 8 of 77

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 33/1MAPSHEET NAME SENGEREMA

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % of Mapsheet area

------------------------------------------------- _--_------------____

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) -2. Forest Plantation (Fp) 50 0.09%

TOTAL FOREST (F) 50 0.09%

II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 631.25 1.13%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 4356.25 7.8211.

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 4987.50 8.95%.

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) -6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 2393.75 4.30%7. Open Bushland (Bc) 3187.50 5.72%


IV. GRASSLAND (6+)S. Open Grassland (G) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 543.75 0.98%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg)

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) 54:5.75 0.98%


bushes (Mb) 287.50 0.51%".13. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 1100.00 1.97%TOTAL MBUGA (M) Z806.25 6.82%

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 24018.75 43.11%'.1S. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb) 12343.75 22.15%17. Cultivation and tree

remnants (Ct) 212.50 0.38%TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 37275.00 66.90%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag)20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) - -21. Open Water (W) 3475.00 6.24%

TOTAL OTHERS 3475.00 6.24%GRAND TOTAL AREA 55718.75 100.00%

ANNEX 1Page 9 of 77

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 33/3MAPSHEET NAME

------ __-___--_-----------__________---------------------------__----

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % o4 Mapsheet area

------------------------ ______------------------------------------__-

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 187.50 0.49%2. Forest Plantation (Fp) - -

TOTAL FOREST (F) 187.50 0.49,'

II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 1037.50 2.72%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 1793.75 4.70-,'


III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thick:et (T) 6.25 0.02%6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 146e.75 .85%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 431.25 1.1-;3%


IV. GRASSLAND (G+)S. Open Grassland (6) 262.50 0.69%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 2368.75 6.20%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 250.00 0.65%

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G6) 2881.25 7.54%

V. MBUGA (M)I1. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 2412.50 6.32%12. Mbuga with scattered

bushes (Mb) 2500 6.55%1-. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) -TOTAL MBUGA (M) 4912.5 12.87%

VI. CULTIVATION (C.)14. Open Cultivation (C) 17925 46.95%1S. Cultivation with tree



remnants (Ct) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 25462.50 66.69%



ANNEX 1Page 10 of 77

AREA COVERAGE DATA


--------------------------------------------------------------- __----

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) *. of Mapsheet area

--------------------------------------------- ______---------------__-

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn)2. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F) - -



1II. BUSHLAND (0)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 906.25 1.17%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 9737.50 12.5.3%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (9) 10643.75 13.70%

IV. GRASSLAND (Ge)S. Open Grassland (G) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 56.25 0.07%10. Bushed Grassland (9g) 4306.25 5.54%

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) 4362.50 5.61%

V. MOUGA (1)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 87.50 0.11%12. Mbuga with scattered

bushes (Mb) :3962.5 5.10%13. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) - _TOTAL MBUGA (M) 4050 5.21%,'

VI. CULTIVATION (Cl)14. Open Cultivation (C) 493.75 0.64%,15. Cultivation with tree


remn.nts (Cb) 206.25 0.26%17. Cultivation and tree

remnants (Ct) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (Ce) 756.25 0.97%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag)20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) -21. Open Water (W) 18268.75 =.51%.

TOTAL OTHERS 18268.75 23.51%GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700 99.99%

ANN 1Page 11 of 77

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA. MAPSHEET NUMBER 45/11 MAPSHEET NAME BWANGA

…------------------------------------------------------ - _________LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) * of Map

sheet area…-----------------------------------------------------------------__-

I. FORESTt (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 618.75 0.80%2. Forest Plantation (Fp) - -

TOTAL FOREST (F) 618.75 b.90-



IIT. BUSHLAND (B) %5. Thicket (T) 75.00 0.10%6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 1631.25 2.10%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 3256.25 4.19%


IV. GRASSLAND (G+)_. Open Grassland (G) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg)10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 3237.50 4.17%


Y. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 1075.00 1.38%12. Mbuga with scattered

bushes (Mb) 1636e.75 21.07%'13. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 568.75 0.7*73%TOTAL MBUGA (M) 18012.50 23.18%

VI. CULTIVATION (*)14. Open Cultivation (C) 4900.00 6.31%.15. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) - -16. Cultivation and bush

remnants (Cb) 50.00 0:z.06%17. Cultivation and tree

remnants (Ct) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (Ce) 4950.00 6.:37%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag) - -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr)21. Open Water (W) - -



AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 45/2MAPSHEET NAME BUSERESERE

----------------------------------- __---___-_----------------__------


------------------------------------------------------------------ __-



II. WOODLAND (W).z. Dense Woodland (Wd) 32568.75 41.92%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 3593.75 4.62%


III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) -6. Dense Bushland (Pd) 140)81.25 1.39%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 2856.25 S;.68%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) 3937.50 5.071z.

IV. GRASSLAND (G.)e. Open Grassland (G) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 225 0.29%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 1625 2.09%

TOTAL GRASSLAND (6+) 1850 2.1.38%


bushes (Mb) 8406.25 10.82%13. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 2381.25 ". 06%TOTAL MBUGA (M) 11106.25 14.29%

VI. CULTIVATION CC+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 16143.75 20.78%15. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) 818.75 1.05,16. Cultivation and bush

remnants (Cb) 6087.50 7.8/%17. Cultivation and tree

remnants (Ct) 656.25 0.85%TOTAL CULTIVATION (CC) 23706.25 3.0.511%.


TOTAL OTHERS - -GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700 100.00%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 63/3MAPSHEET NAME KAHAMA

…-------------------------------------------------------------------LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % of Map

sheet area

T. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn)2. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F) -

II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 3868.75 5.16%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 8843.75 11.7S%


III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) 600. 00 C:. 8C'.6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 2S7.5t0 3.38%7. Open Bushland (So) 2450.00 .7%


IV. GRASSLAND (8+)8. Open Grassland (6) -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 81.25 0.11%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg)


V. IBUGA (C)II. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 4168.75 5.56%12. Mbuga with scattered

bushes (Mb) 49937..75 6.65%13. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 8862.50 11.81%TOTAL MBUGA (M) 18025 24 .* 2%'2

VI. CULTIVATION (C.)14. Open Cultivation (C) 22475 29.95%15. Cultivation with tree

croos (Ct) -16. Cultivation and bush

remnants (Cb) 15256.25 20.3..%17. Cultivation and tree

remnants (Ct) 3150 4."60%TOTAL CULTIVATION (C.) 40881.25 54.48%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag) -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) -21. Open Water (W) -

TOTAL OTHERS GRAND TOTAL AREA 75037.50 100%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 78/2MAPSHEET NAME SENAIBUYOGO

------------------------ ______----------------_-____--------__--____-


I. . FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn)2. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 11756.25 15.13%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 13900.00 17.e9'.

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 25656.25 33. 02%

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (Bd)7. Open Bushland (Bo) 562.50 0.72%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) 562.50 0.72/.

IV. GRASSLAND (G+)S. Open Grassland (G) 18.75 0.02%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 881.25 1.14%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) - -

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) 900.00 1.16'

V. MBUGA (M)it. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 1187.50 1.53%12. Mbuga with scattered

bushes (Mb) 5918.75 7.62%1:3. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 9887.50 12.72%TOTAL MBUGA (M) 16993.75 21.87%

VI. CULTIVATION (Co)14. Open Cultivation (C) 24268.75 31.233%15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb) 7450.00 9.59%'17. Cultivation and tree

remnants (Ct) 1818.75 2.34%TOTAL CULTIVATION (C.) 3Z537.50 47.16%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag) - -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) 50.00 0.06%21. Open Water (W) - -



AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 78/:MAPSHEET NAME tASIMANI RIVER

---- ___-__--------------_-_____------------------------------__------


------------------------------------------------------------------ __-

r. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn)2. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 16075.0t0 72.9 .C.4. Open Woodland (Wo) 812.5 Z.68%


III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T)6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 125.00 0.57%.7. Open Bushland (Bo) - -

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) 125.0':' 0.57%

TV. GRASSLAND (G+)S. Open Grassland (G) 12.50 0.06%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 318.75 1.45%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 1093.75 4.96%


V. MBUA (CM)iI. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 1300.00 5.9Ca%12. Mbuga with scattered



vr. CULTIVATION CC+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 168.75 0.76%15. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) -16. Cultivation and bush

remnants (Cb) 231.25 '1.c:5%17. Cultivation and tree

remnants (Ct) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C.) 400.00 1.81%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag) -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) 437.50 1.9e%21. Open Water (W) - -

TOTAL OTHERS 437.50 1.98% /GRAND TOTAL AREA 22050.00 1O. 00%

AMX 1Page 16 of 77

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 78/4MAPSHEET NAME SUNGA RIVER

_____________________________________________________________________


--------------------------------------- _-------_-_----------------__-

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 6.25 0.01%2. Forest Plantation (Fp) - _


rI.I WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 43012.50 55./.%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 4143.75 5.3.3%


IrI. BUSHLAND CB)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (9d) - -7. Open Bushland (Bo) 350.00 0.45%


IV. GRASSLAND (G+)S. Open Grassland (G) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 731.25 0.94%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 68.75 0.09%



bushes (Mb) 543.75 0.708.13. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 7568.75 9.74%TOTAL MBUGA CM) 8125.00 10.46%

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 14393.75 18.52-,'15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb) 6825.00 B.78%17. Cultivation and tree

remnants (Ct) - _TOTAL CULTIVATION (CC) 21218.75 27.70%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag) -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) 4-.7521. Open Water (W) - -

TPTAL OTHERS 43.75 0.0C)6%GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 100%

ANIiEX 1Page 17 of 77

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 79/1MAPSHEET NAME UKUNE

------------------------------------------------------------ _______--


------------------------------ ____--------------------------------__-

I. FOREST: tF)1. Natural Forest (Fn)2. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 13637.50 18.14%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 8756.25 11.65%/.


III. BUSHLAND CB)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (9d) 1193.75 1. 59%.7. Open Bushland (Bo) 2200.00 2.97.


IV. GRASSLAND (6)S. Open Grassland (G) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 231.25 0.31%

10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) - -TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) 231.25 0.31%



cultivation (Mc) 4287.50 5.70%TOTAL MBUGA (M) 13612.50 1E.10%

VI. CULTIVATION (CC)14. Open Cultivation (C) 26C206.25 3.4.e5%15. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct)16. Cultivation and bush

remnants (Cb) 5437.50 7 .*%17. Cultivation and tree

remnants (Ct) 3875.00 5.15%TOTAL CULTIVATION (C.) 35518.75 47.23%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag)20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) 37.50 0. 05%21. Open Water (W) - -

TOTAL OTHERS 37.50 5':.sxGRAND TOTAL AREA 75187.50 100%

ANNEX IPage 18 of 77

AREA COVERAGE DATA


…--------------------------------------------------------------__---LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % ofi Map

sheet area---------------------------------------------------------------- __---


TOTAL FOREST (F)


TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 40550 52.19%

XIr. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 162.50 0.21%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 1306.25 1.68%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (9) 1468.75 1.89%

IV. GRASSLAND (G+)8. Open Grassland (5) - -9. Wooded 6lassland (Wg) 225 0.29%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 2606.25 3. * 5%


V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 2525 .25%12. Mbuga with scattered






remnants (Ct) 193.75 :5%TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 21937.5 -8.23;%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U)19. Bare Ground (Bag) -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) 150 0.19%21. Open Water (W) -

TOTAL OTHERS 150 0. 19%GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700 99.99%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 62/1MAPSHEET NAME BUKOMBE


------------------------------------------------------------------ __-

S. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 31.25 0.14%2. Forest Plantation (Fp) - _


II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 9537.50 1-.27%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 7025.00 9.04%


rI2. BUSHLAND (B)S. Thick:et (T) --

* a6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 25.00 0.03%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 2143.75 2.76%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) 216e.75 2.79%

IV. GRASSLAND (G+)S. Open Grassland (G) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 193.75 0.25%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) -

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G.) 193.75 0.25%

V. MBUGA (M)iI. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 10087.50 12.98%12. Mbuga with scattered



VI. CULTIVATION (+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 29675.00 78.19%15. Cultivation with tree



remnants (Ct) 3081.2S5 'e. 97%TOTAL CULTIVAT!ON (C+) 41912.50 53.95%

VIr. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag) 20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) 6.25 0.0l%21. Open Water (W) - _

TOTAL OTHERS 6.25 0.01%-GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 100%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 46/4MAPSHEET NAME LUNGUYA

-------------------------- _-__-----------------____--_----------__--_


------------------------------ _-_-----__-__-----------------------__-


TOTAL FOREST (F)



1II. BUSHLAND eB)5. Thicket tT) - -6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 1175 1.51%7. Open Bushland (So) 17025 21.91%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) 18200w 27.42%

rv. GRASSLAND (G+)8. Open Grassland (G) . 106.25 0.14%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) -10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 100.00 0.1Z.%


V. MBUGA (M)iI. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 900.00 1.16%12. Mbuga with scattered



VI. CULTIVATION (CC) '

14. Open Cultivation (C) 24750 31.8S15. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) - _16. Cultivation and bush


remnants (Ct) 50.00 0. 06%TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 40575 52.22%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) -.19. Bare Ground (Sag) -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) -21. Open Water (W) -

TOTAL OTHERS -GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700 100%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 79/4MAPSHEET NAME EULUNDE

---------------------------------------------------------------- __---



TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W)Dense Woodland (Wd) 1904..75 24.97%

4. Open Woodland (Wo) 18650.00 24.45%TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 3769,..75 49.42%'

III. BUSHLAND (5)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 125.00 0.16%.7. Open Bushland (So) 33068.75 4.02%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) *_193.75 4.18%

IV. GRASSLAND (G+)8. Open Grassland (G) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 1225.00 1.61%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) - -

TOTAL GRASSLAND (Gb) 1225.00 1.61%

V. MBUGA CM)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 1706.5 2.24%i2. Mbuga with scattered

bushes (Mb) 5=87.50 7-}.06%

13. Mbuga with scatteredcultivation (Mc) 912.50 1.2`0%TOTAL MBUGA 'M) 8006.25 10 .501,

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 20168.75 26.44%'.15. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) 281.25 '. 7%16. Cultivation and bush

remnants (Cb) 57C06.15 7.48%-17. Cultivation and tree


VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Sag) -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) -21. Open Water (W) -



AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER e0/3MAPSHEET NAME UTWIGU

------ ____-___----------------------------------------------------__-


---------------------------------------------------------------------


TOTAL FOREST (F) - _

II. WOODLAND tW)Dense Woodland (Wd) 236S8.75 -. 05%

4. Open Woodland (Wo) 6243.75 6.04%TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 8612.50 11.09%

rII. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (EJ) 2087.50 2.69%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 1100.00 1.41%L


IV. GRASSLAND (6+)8. Open Grassland (G) - -9. Wooded 6lassland (Wg) 362.50 0.46%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 43.75 0.06%

TOTAL GRASSLAND (6) 406.25 0.51%

V. MBUGA (I)I1. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 112.50 0.14%12. Mbuga with scattered



VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) ;2168.75 15.66%15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb) 5068.75 6.57.17. Cultivation and tree

remnants (Ct) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 17293.75 2.76%.

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag) 50. 00 Q. 06%20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) - -2:. Open Water (W) 42706.25 54.96,


ANEX 1Page 23 of 77

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 96/3MAPSHEET NAME IGAMBA

…----__________--------------------------------------------------__-LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % of Map

sheet area

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn)2. Forest Plantation tFp)

TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W)S. Dense Woodland (Wd) 16150 57.5%.4. Open Woodland (Wo) 2050 7.:50


-II. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T)8. Dense Bushland (Bd) 31.25 0.11%7. Open Bushland (Ba) 618.75 2.2'.

TOTAL BUSHLAND CB) 650 2.31%

IV. GRASSLAND (5+)S. Open Grassland (G) -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 150 0.53%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 187.5 0.68%



bushes (Mb) Z731.25 13.28%13. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 550 1.96%TOTAL MBUGA (M) 4425 15.75%

VI. CULTIVATION (Ct)14. Open Cultivation (C) - 2125 7.57','15. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) 250 0.89','16. Cultivation and bush


remnants (Ct) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 4475 15.94%.

vIl. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag)20. Grass.and Bare Rock (Gbr)21. Open Water (W)

TOTAL OTHERS .GRAND TOTAL AREA 28087.5 100.0:f1%


ARE4 COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SECMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 96/4MAPSHEET NAME KALEMBELA

…-------------------------------------------------------------______


------------------------------------------------------------------ __-



It. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 47837.50 61.57%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 2012.50 2.59%


rII. BUSILAND (B)S. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 587.50 0.76%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 381.25 0.49%


IV. SRASSLAND (6.)8. Open Grassland (G) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 418.75 0.54%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 1406.25 1.81%

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G6) 1825.00 2. 35%

V. MBUSA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 587.50 0.76%12. Mbuga with scattered

bushes (Mb) 4762.50 6.1-'13. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 241425. 0 -.1TOTAL MBUGA (M) 7775.00 10.1t1%

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 8431.25 10C.85%15. Cultivation with tree



remnants (Ct) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C*) 17e81.25 22.24


TOTAL OTHERS -



AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 97/1MAPSHEET NAME ISERAMAGAZI

------------------------------------------------------------ __-------


---------------------------------------------. _-------------------__--

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 662.50 1.67%2. Forest Plantation (Fp) -


II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 5462.50 1..81%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 6506.25 16.45%


III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (8d) 1487.50 3.76%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 4175.00 10.55%


IV. GRASSLAND (G.)8. Open Grassland (G) 37.50 8.9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 12.50 0.03%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 250.00 0.63%


V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 406.25 1.03%f.12. Mbuga with scattered


cultivation (Mc) 4475.00 11.1%TOTAL MBUGA CM) 7643.75 19 2%

VI. CULTIVATION CC+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 8362.50 21.1.4%1S. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb) 4493.75 11.-6%17. Cultivation and tree

remnants (Ct) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 12856.25 72.50%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag) -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) 18.75 0.0o5%21. Open Water (W) 443.75 1.1-2%

TOTAL OTHERS 462.50 1.17%GRAND TOTAL AREA 39556.25 99.99,%


AREA COVERAGE DATA


…------- - ------------- - - -________ ---------------------------------LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % of Map

sheet area------------------------------------ ____----_---------------------___



II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 44550.00 57.73%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 1668.75 -2.155%


-II. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) _ _6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 1550.00 2.00Ca%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 181.25 0.23%


IV. GRASSLAND (5+)3. Open Grassland (G) -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 218.75 0*. 28%10. Bushed Grassland (8g)




cultivation (Mc) 2106.25 2.71%'TOTAL MBUGA (M) 14056.25 18.0:19%

VI. CULTIVATION (C*)14. Open Cultivatior (C) 3806.25 4.90%15. Cultivation with tree




VII. OTHERS:18. Uroan Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag)20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) 181. 25 C.3%21. Open Water (W) 412.50) 0.53%



AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 97/3MAPSHEET NAME IGWISI

…____________________________________________________________________LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) %, of Map

sheet area------------------------------ _--__-----------------_-----------____-


TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 2966e.75 78.64%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 10831.25 14.11%

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 4(0)500 522.75%

TII. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 2656.25 3.46%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 1281.25 1.67%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) 39:7.5 5.1-3%

IV. GRASSLAND (G+)S. Open Grassland (G)9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) -10. Bushed Grassland (B9g) 1431.25 1.86%


V. MBUGA (H)I1. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 2368.75 .06%12. Mbuga with scattered


cultivation (Mc) 2006.25 :.61%TOTAL MBUGA (M) 9412.5 12.25%

VI. CULTIVATION CC*)14. Open Cultivation (C) 14356._;5 18.7%15. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) 1425 1.e6%16. Cultivation and bush

remnants (Cb) 5512.5 7.18-,'17. Cultivation and tree

remnants (Ct) 206.25 0.-7%TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 21Z500 28.01%

VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag) - -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) 6.25 0.01%21. Open Water (W) - -



AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 97/4MAPSHEET NAME USAGARI




II. WOODLAND tW):3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 38537.50 49.60%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 9793.75 12.60%


TII. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (9d) 593.75 0.76%7. Open Bushland (So) 231.25 0.30%


IV. GRASSLAND (G+)8. Open Grassland (G) -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 39..75 0. 5%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) :2.50 0. 21%

TOTAL GRASSLAND (6+) 406.25 0.53%

V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 2112.50 2.72'I12. Mbuga with scattered

bushes (Mb) 5050.00 6.5013. Mbuga with scattered


VI. CULTIVATION (C.)14. Open Cultivation (C) 10425.00 U.42%15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb) 5675.00 7 * 30%17. Cultivation and tree


VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag)20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) 68.75 0.09%21. Open Water (W) 206.25 C.26%

TOTAL OTHERS 275.00 O.Z35% GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 100.00%

ANNEX 1rage zg of 77

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 98/1MAPSHEET NAME MAMBALI

---------------------------------------------------------------- __---


------------------------------------------------------------------ __-

r. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 81.2(:1.1%2. Forest Plantation (Fp) - -


Ir. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 26237.5 73.77%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 22206.25 28.58%


IlI. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thichet (T) -6. Dense Bushland (Bd) - -7. Open Bushland (Bo) 4287.5 5.52%


IV. GRASSLAND (G*)8. Open Grassland (G) 125 0.16%'9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 4181.25 5._8%10. Bushed Grassland (8g) 662.5 0.85%

TOTAL GRASSLAND (Ge) 4968.75 6.39%

V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 6556.25 8.44Z12. Mbuga with scattered


cultivation (Mc) 106.25 0.14,'TOTAL MBUGA (M) 11518.75 14.83-

VI. CULTIVATION (C*)14. Open Cultivation (C) 5937.5 7.64%15. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) -

16. Cultivation and bushremnants (Cb) 2462.5 .17-

17. Cultivation and treeremnants (Ct) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (Cc) 8400 10.81%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag) -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) -21. Open Water (W) -

TOTAL OTHERS -

GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 98/2MAPSHEET NAME IPALA

------------------------------ _______-__-----------------------------

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) X of Mapsheet area

I. FOREST: .(F)1. Natural Forest (Fn)2. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F) -

II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 27912.5 3.5.92',.4. Open Woodland (Wo) 13O31.25 16.77%


III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (9d) 707.5 0.95',7. Open Bushland (Bo) 1537.5 1.98%


IV. GRASSLAND (Gl)8. Open Grassland (G) 43.75 0.06%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 75 0.1%10. Bushed Grassland (9g) 2318.75 2.98%


V. MBUGA CM)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 4850 6.24','.12. Mbuga with scattered


cultivation (Mc) 1293.75 1.67%TOTAL MBUGA (M) 17507.S 22.57%

VI. CULTIVATION CC+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 10531.25 1-.55,'15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb) .931.25 5.06%17. Cultivation and tree

remnants (Ct) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (Cc) 14462.5 18.61%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag)2o. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) 43.75 0.06%-1. Open Water (W) -

TOTAL OTHERS 43.75 0.06%GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700 100%

AMNEX 1Page 31 of 77

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 98/3MAPSHEET NAME IBIRA




II. WOODLAND (W):3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 3.0931.5 r9.e2%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 3800 4.89%


II2. BUSHLAND (C)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (8d) 1631.25 2.1%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 831.25 1.07%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) 2462.5 3. 17%

IV. GRASSLAND (G+)8. Open Grassland (G) 106.25 0.14%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 656.25 0.84%,'10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 187.5 0.254%

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) 950 1.22%



cultivation (Mc) 800o 1.0C3%TOTAL MBUGA (M) 12581.25 16.19%

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 18706.25 24. 07%15. Cultivation with tree



remnants (Ct) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (CC) 25162.5 32.38%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Sag)20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) -21. Open Water (W) 1418.75 1.8a%


ANIEX 1Page 32 of 77

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 98/4MAPSHEET NAME LYUI

…-----------------------,.----------------------_--_--------------___-LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % of Map

sheet area…-----------------------------------------------------------------__-


TOTAL FOREST (F)

IT. WOODLAND tW)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 8400.00 l0.81%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 4025.00 5.18%.

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 12425.0':) 15.99%

III. PUSHLAND (B)S. Thicl::et (T) -6. Dense Bushland (8d) 5:87. 50 6. 9.. '7. Open Bushland (Bo) 2243.75 2.89%


IV. GRASSLAND (G+)8. Open Grassland (G) 6.25 0.01%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) - -10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) -




cultivation (Mc) 6293.75 8.10%TOTAL MBUGA CM) 8187.50 10.55%.

VI. CULTIVATION CC+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 33962. 50 43.71%15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb) 14100. 00 18.15%17. Cultivation and tree

remnants (Ct) 162.50 0.?1%TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 49237.5 63. ;7/.

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) 187.50 c).24%19. Bare Ground (Bag) - -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) 6.25 0.01l-/.21. Open Water (W) (DAM) 18.75 C:J.O/2%

TOTAL OTHERS 212.SC) 0:.27%.GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 lOO.60',

AMEX 1Page 33 of 77

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 46/1MAPSHEET NAME NYAMBALE

____________---_---------_-_____-__-----------___________------------


…______--------------___----_ _ -- _____________- __________

I. FORESTi (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 425 (:l.55%2. Forest Plantation (Fp) - -

TOTAL FOREST (F) 425 0.55%

II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 23662.5 30.45/.4. Open Woodland (Wo) 1125 1.48%


III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) -6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 187.5 0.24%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 1131.25 1.46%


IV. GRASSLAND (G+)S. Open Grassland (G) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 37.5 0.05%10. Bushed Grassland (Eg) - -




cultivation (Mc) 10306.25 13 .?6%TOTAL MBUGA (M) 16018.75 20.61%

VI. CULTIVATION (C.)14. Open Cultivation (C) 26006.25 33.47%15. Cultivation with tree



remnants (Ct) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 35112.5 45.19%.

VIZ. OTHERS:is. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag)20. Grass and Dare Rock (Gbr)21. Open Water (W)

TOTAL OTHERS GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700 100.03T.%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 46/2MAPSHEET NAME IKINA


---------------- ___-----------------------------------------------__-


TOTAL FOREST (F) 93.7! 5.12%

II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 16481.25 2-1.21%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 2462.50 3.17%


IlI. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thick:et (T)6. Dense Bushland (Ed) 2512.5 %7. Open Bushland (Bo) 1Q87.5 1.40%


IV. GRASSLAND (G+)8. Open Grassland (6) -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 118.75 0.15%/.10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 306.25 0.407.


V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) - -12. Mbuga with scattered

bushes (Mb)13. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (MC) 2825 3.64%TOTAL MBUGA (M) 2825 - .64%


crops (Ct) .43.75 0.44%16. Cultivation and bush


remnants (Ct)TOTAL CULTIVATION (CC) 51812.5 66.A8%

VIl. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag)20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr)21. Open Water (W)

TOTAL OTHERS GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700 100%

ANEX 1Page 35 of 77

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 46/3MAPSHEET NAME MBOGWE

…----------------------------------------------------------------__--LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % of Map

sheet area_____________________________________________________________________


TOTAL FOREST (F) -

II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 9206.25 11.85%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 12675.00 16.1Z1%


III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 2CO6.25 2.58/.7. Open Bushland (Bo) 5250.00 6.76%


IV. GRASSLAND (6+)8. Open Grassland (6,) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 262.50 c:.34%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg)




cultivation (Mc) 3993.75 5.14%TOTAL MBUGA CM) 10556.25 13.58%

VI. CULTIVATION CC+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 24500 31.53%15. Cultivation with tree




VII. OTHERS:16. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag) -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) -21. Open Water (W) -

TOTAL OTHERS GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700 100%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMSER 99/1MAPSHEET NAME RUGE

------------------------------------------------------------------- __


--------- _--------------------------------------------------------__-


TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND CW)Z. Dense Woodland (Wd) 4112.50 18.0:'9%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 1668.75 7.34%'


III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (9d)7. Open Bushland (So) 4121.25 18.17%.

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) 4131.25 13.171%,

IV. GRASSLAND (6+)8. Open Grassland (G) 12.50 0.05%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 231.25 1.10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 956.25 4.21%.


V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 121. 50 5.'3%12. Mbuga with scattered

bushes (Mb) 200. 0.88%13. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 600.00 .64%TOTAL MBUGA (M) 2012.5 8.85%

VI. CULTIVATION CC.)14. Open Cultivation (C) 7731.25 774.00%15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb) 1881.25 8.27'.17. Cultivation and tree

remnants (Ct) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C.) 9612.50 42.227%.

VII. OTHERS:1i3. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Sag)20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr)21. Open Water (W)

TOTAL OTHERS -GRAND TOTAL AREA 22737.50 lo0.(0%.

ANNE= 1Page 37 of 77

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 99/3MAPSHEET NAME NDALA


------------------- ___________--------------------------___---_---__-

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 3.62.50 0.48%2. Forest Plantation (Fp) - _


It. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 14887.50 19.51%/.4. Open Woodland (Wo) 4793.75 6.28%


Iri. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (Ed) 4456.25 5.84%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 1793.75 2.3.5%


IV. GRASSLAND (G*)8. Open Grassland (G) 43.75 0.06%9. Wooded Gla'ssland (Wg) 1587.50 2.08%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) - -


V. MBUGA (M)II. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 2181.25 .66'12. Mbuga with scattered

bushes (Mb) -718.75 4.87%13. Mbuga with scattered


VI. CULTIVATION (C.)14. Open Cultivation (C) 29187.50 .6.5,15. Cultivation with tree

crops (CtU -16. Cultivation and bush

remnants (Cb) 12300.00( 16. 12%17. Cultivation and tree

remnants (Ct) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C-) 41487.50 54.37%

VII. OTHERS:l8. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag) - -20. Grass and Bare Rack (Gbr) - -21. Open Water (W) - -

TOTAL OTHERS GRAND TOTAL AREA 76300.00 100.00%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 99/4MAPSHEET NAME ISENEGEZYA

…------------------------------------------------------------__------LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) %. of Map

sheet area------------------------------------------------------------------ __-

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 306.25 0 . 4 C'2. Forest Plantation (Fr) - -

TOTAL FOREST (F) 306. 25 C'.4%

II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 11643.75 15.21%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 6425 8.65%

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) i8:68.75 23.66%

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket tT) - -6. Dense Bushland (Ed) 1137.5 1.49%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 3562.5 4.651%


IV. GRASSLAND (G+)B. Open Grassland (G) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 8331.25 10.SS%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) - -

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G.) - 8331.25 10.88%

V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 17643.75 23. Z5%12. Mbuga with scattered

bushes (Mb) 2050 2.68%1V. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 2506.25 .7%TOTAL MBUGA (M) :2'200 29%

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 13312.5 17.'39%'15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb) 9431.25 12. _,'17. Cultivation and tree

remnants (Ct) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 22743.75 :9.71%'

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (bag)20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) -

21. Open Water (W)TOTAL OTHERS - -GRAND TOTAL AREA 76550 99.99%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 100/3MAPSHEET NAME MAf'ILINGA

-…-- --____---------------__-----_-------________________LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % of Map

sheet area


TOTAL FOREST (F) 425.00 1.0:.%

II. WOODLAND (W):3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 19025.00 46.22%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 5450.00 13.24%

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 24475.0)0 59.46%

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) _ _6. Dense Bushland (Bd) -7. Open Bushland (Bo) -

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) -

IV. GRASSLAND (GC4)S. Open Grassl and (G) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 8181.25 19.88%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) -


V. MBUGA CM)I1. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 275.00 0.67%12. Mbuga with scattered


cultivation (Mc) 18.75 0.04%TOTAL MBUGA (M) 325 0.79%

VI. CULTIVATION (CC)14. Open Cultivation (C) 3043.75 7. 39 %15. Cultivation with tree



remnants (Ct) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (Co) 7756.25 18.84%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag) - -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) - -i1. Open Water (W) - -

TOTAL OTHERS - -GRAND TOTAL AREA 41162.50 100.00%".

_4


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 116/1MAPSHEET NAME KOMBE


------------------------------------------------------------------ __-



II. WOODLAND (W)4S. Dense Woodland (Wd) 89.7.50 20.1S%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 13075.00 29.4911.


III. BUSHLAND (3)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense BushIand (8d) - -7. Open Bushland (So) - -

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) - -

IV. GRASSLAND (G+)8. Open Grassrand (G) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) - -10. Bushed Grassland (9g) 675.00 1.52%

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) 67S5.00 1.52%

V. MBUGA (N)I1. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 13906.25 31.-36%12. Mbuga with scattered

bushes (Mb) 1531.25 . 45%13. Mbuga with scattered




remnants (Cb) 1712.50 ..86%17. Cultivation and tree

remnants (Ct) TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 5831.25 13.15%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag) - -2O. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) - -21. Open Water (W) - _

TOTAL OTHERS - -GRAND TOTAL AREA 44=37.50 99.99%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 116/2MAPSHEET NAME KALIUA

---------------------------------------------------------------------



TOTAL FOREST (F) -

II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 16643.75 21.42%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 5625.00 7.24%!


1II. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) -6. Dense Bushland (8d) 163l.25 1.1(1.7. Open Bushland (Bo) 1493.75 1.92%


IV. GRASSLAND (6.)8. Open Grassland (G) -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 3906.25 5.03%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 243.75 O.31%



bushes (Mb) 4187.50 5.39%'13. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 8225.00 10:.58%,TOTAL MBUGA (M) 13062.50 16.81%

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 29912.50 38.50*5.15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb) 5181.25 6.671,'17. Cultivation and tree



TOTAL OTHERS - -GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 100%-.


AREA COVEBAGE DATA

PROCJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 117/1MAPSHEET NAME URAMSO

______-_____________________ --------------------------------------LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % of Map

sheet area

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) -2. Forest Plantation (Fp) 1:7.50 (:3.18%

TOTAL FOREST (F) 137.50 (:3.18%

II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 7750.0C 9.97%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 14137.50 18.19%

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 21887.50 :8.16%

IlI. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) - _6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 993.75 1. 28%.7. Open Bushland (Bo) 3918.75 5.04%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) 4912.50 6.3=%

IV. GRASSLAND (G+)S. Open Grassland (G) 18.75 0. 02.%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 225.00 0..0%1C. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 1200C.00 1.54%

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G6) 144.3.75 1.86S',

V. MBUGA (M)il. Mbuga with grass (Mg) ..s5). 0 0 0:3.45%12. Mbuga with scattered

bushes (Mb) 1662.50 .14%1. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 2156.25 2.78%TOTAL MBUGA (M) 4168.75 5.377.




remnants (Ct) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C.) 45l5w0.00 58.10%


TOTAL OTHERSGRAND TOTAL AREA 77700J. 00 99.99:


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 117/2MAPSHEET NAME USOKE

----------------------------- _---------------__-_---_-------___---__-



TOTAL FOREST (F)


TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 19062 .5 24. 5%'

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 1737.50 . 24%7. Open Bushland (Bo) Z075.00 :.96%


IV. GRASSLAND (G+)8. Open Grassland (6) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 93.75 0.12%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) - -


V. PBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) -12. Mbuga with scattered


cultivation (Mc) 2787.50 :.59%TOTAL MBUGA (M) 8900.00 11.46%


crops tCt) - -16. Cultivation and bush



VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag) -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) I .so 5.02%21. Open Water (W) -

TOTAL OTHERS 1 . 50 . 02%GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700 . 00 100. 01 1%

78


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 117/3MAPSHEET NAME UYUMEO


------------------------------------------------------------------ __-

S. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn)2. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F) -

II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 27412.50 MS.28%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 45643.75 58.74%


ItI. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (Bd) - -7. Open Bushland (So) - -


IV. GRASSLAND (G+)8. Open Grassland (G) 6.25 0.01%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 4556.25 5.86%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) - -

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) 4562.50 5.871l'

V. MBUGA (f)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 81.25 0.10%12. Mbuga with scattered

bushes (Mb) -13. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) - _TOTAL MBUGA (M) 81.25 0.10%

VI. CULTIVATION (Ce)14. Open Cultivation (C) - -15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb) - -17. Cultivation and tree

remnants (Ct) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (Cl) - -

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag) - -20. Grass and.Bare Rock (Gbr) - -21. Open Water (W) - -


ANNEX IARCA COVERAGE DATA Page 45 of 77

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 117/4MAPSHEET NAME IZIMBILI

n--------------------------------------------------------------__----LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % of Map

sheet area…-----------------------------------------------------------------__-


TOTAL FOREST (F) -

II. WOODLAND (W)N. Dense Woodland (Wd) 16831.25 2166%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 52412.50 67.46%

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 69243.75 69.12%z.

IIr. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) -6. Dense BuIshland (Bd)7. Open BEshland (Bo) 1 =5.Cn) C.16%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) 12S. 00 .16%

IV. GRASSLAND (6e)S. Open Grassland (S) 1SOb.00 0.19%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 918.75 1.18%

10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) - -TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) 1068.75 1.377.

V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 2787.50 7.59%*2'. Mbuga with scattered

bushes (Mb) Z56.25 0.46%1z. Mbuga with scattered


VI. CULTIVATION (+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 164-.7 2.11%15. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) -16. Cultivation and L.5h

remnants (Cb) 468.75 -.1°%17. Cultivation and tree


VII. OTHERS: -

18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag) - -2O. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) 6.5 S 1%.21. Open Water (W) - -

TOTAL OTHERS 6.2 2:5 Q. 1%,.GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.OC0 100.0(%

40


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 118/1MAPSHEET NAME MASAMA


------------------------------------------------------------------ __-

I. FORESTs (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) -

2. Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F) -

II. WOODLAND (W)T. Dense Woodland (Wd) 19.87.50 24.95%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 7987.50 10.29%

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 27375.00 -35.2S=

X11. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 7775. nt0 1. 00%7. Open Bushland (Do) 868.75 1.1^%


IV. GRASSLAND (G-'.)S. Open Grassland (G) -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 662.50 0.85%10. Bushed Grassland (8g) 1275.00 1.64%


V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 506.25 0.65%12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) 525.00 0.671,13. Mbuga with scattered


VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 31018.75 7.9.9Z.%15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb) 1Z562.50 17.46%17. Cultivation and Tree

remnants (Ct) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C*) 44S81.25 57.38%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag)2.0. Grass and Bare Rock: (Gbr)21. Open Water (OW)

TOTAL OTHERS -GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 10t'10%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 118/2MAPSHEET NAME TABORA

------------------------------------ -__--_____________________LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % of Map

sheet area_________________________________---_--______________________________-

I. FORESTs (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn)2. Forest Plantation (Fp)


II. WOODLAND (W)-3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 10437.50 13. 43%4. Open Woodland (Wa) 8206.25 10.567.


III. BUSHL.AND (B)5. Thicket (T) 54.00 o 0. 06%6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 1431.25 1.85%7. Open BEushland (Bo) 7212.50 9.28%


IV. GRASSLAND (S.)8. Open Grassland (G) 31.25 0.04%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 1556.25 2.00%10. Bushed Grassland (8g) 9475.00 12.20%.

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) 11062.50: 14.24%.

V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 4712.50 6.0i6%i. Mbuga with Scattered


cultivation (Mc) 2468.75 3.19%TOTAL MBUGA (M) 11693.75 15.05%.

VI. CULTIVATION (CC)14. Open Cultivation (C) 11131.25 14.33%15. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) 8275.00 10.65-.16. Cultivation and bush


remnants (Ct) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C.) 26056.25 5.5.%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) 1150.00 1.48%19. Bare Ground (Bag) 162.50 0.21%20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) 143.75 0.18%21. Open Water (OW) 93.75 0.1:7%

TOTAL OTHERS 1550.00 1.99%GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 99.99,'


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 119/3MAPSHEET NAME PANGALE






III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (Bd)7. Open Bushland (Bo)

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) -

IV. GRASSLAND (G+)S. Open Grassland (G) - -9. Wooded 6lassland (Wg) 287.50 0.37%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) - -

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) 287.50 t.Z-7%

V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 2562.50 :3.30%12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) 7050 .*00 9.*071%13. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 981. 25 1 . 26%TOTAL MBUGA (M) 10593.75 13.6-%



remnants (Cb) 6443.75 8.29-17. Cultivation and Tree

remnants (Ct) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C.) 21650.00 27.86%.

VrI. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag) -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) -21. Open Water (OW) - -

TOTAL OTHERS -GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 99.99%

- ANNEX 1Pag 4 of 77AREA COVERAGE DATA 9 7


…-----------------------------------------___------------------------LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % of Map

sheet area…-----------------------------___-__-----____---------------------__-

S. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn)2. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F) -

II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 16675 21.46%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 24343.75 3.-37%

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 41018.75 5t. 79.%

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) -6. Dense Bushland (Bd) - -7. Open Bushland (Bo) 6262.50 8.9. 06%


rV. GRASSLAND (6+)S. Open Grassland (S)9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 3581.25 4.61%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 1118.75 1.44%

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G6) 4700.00 6.0 )5%

V. MBUGA (M)II. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 8937.50 11.50%12. Mbuga with Scattered


cultivation (Mc) 731.25 C0.941,'TOTAL MBUGA (M) 18518.75 2.83%

VI. CULTIVATION (C)14. Open Cultivation (C) 3981.25 .15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb) 2793.75 7.60S%17. Cultivation and Tree


VII. OTHERS:la. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag) - -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) 406.25 Q. 52--21. Open Water (OW) 18.75

TOTAL OTHERS 425 c55GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 1007.

ANNEX 1rage 50 of 77

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 119/1MAPSHEET NAME IGALULA

…________ - --------------- - _______________________________________LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % of Map

sheet area…-----------------------------------------------------------------__-



II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 30625.00 39.41%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 7768.75 lo(,)(.).

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 3839Z.75 49.41%

III. BUSHLAND (8)5. Thicket (T) -6. Dense Bushland (8d) -7. Open Bushland (So) 2700.0 :3. 47%


IV. GRASSLAND (Ge)8. Open Grassland (G) 18.75 0.02%9. Wooded Glasgland (Wg) 2468.75 3.18-%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg)

TOTAL GRASSLAND (Ge) 2487.50 20%

V. MBUGA CM)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 3481.25 4.48%12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) 2000 .00 2.57%.13. Mbuga with scattered


VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 11550.00 14.86%Z.15. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) 400. 00 Ci. 5%*1.16. Cultivation and bush

remnants (Cb) 10137.50 13.05%,17. Cultivation and Tree

remnants (Ct) 3725.00 4.79%TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 25812.50 7-33.22%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U)19. Bare Ground (Bag)20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr)1. Open Water (OW)

TOTAL OTHERSGRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 99.99%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 119/2MAPSHEET NAME BUBADA

------------------ _-____--____--___-------------------------__--___--


---------------------------------------------------------------------

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 256.25

2. Forest Plantation (Fp) -TOTAL FOREST (F) 256.25

II. WOODLAND (W)Dense Woodland (Wd) 42093.75 54.17%'

4. Open Woodland (Wo) 10625.00.: 1`.57%TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 52718.75 67.844%

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thick:et (T) -

6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 387.50 0.50%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 56.25 0.07%


IV. GRASSLAND (G*)8. Open Grassland (G) 31.25 0.04%9. Wooded Glaissland (Wg) 5818.75 7.49%

10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 12243.75 15.76%TOTAL GRASSLAND (G4) 18093.75 23.29%

V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 4431.25 5.70',%12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) 1637.50 2.1'%17. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) -TOTAL MBUGA (M) 6068.75 7.8S/



remnants (Cb) 81.25 C'. 10%17. Cultivation and Tree


VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U)19. Bare Ground (Bag)12. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr)21. Open Water (OW)

TOTAL OTHERSGRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 99.99%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 119/3MAPSHEET NAME IGOWEKO

…------------------------------------------------------------------__LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % of Map

sheet area…-----------------------------------------------------------------__-


TOTAL FOREST (F) -

II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 25306.25 :..57%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 18862.50 24.28%


IrI. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (Bd) - -7. Open Bushland (Bo) 925.00 1.19%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) 925.0C0 1.19%

IV. GRASSLAND (G*)8. Open Grassland (G)9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 1468.75 1.89%

10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) - -TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) 1468.75 1.89%


bushes (Mb) 7718.75 9.94%1t_ Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 5'1.275 6.68%TOTAL MBUGA (M) 14318.75 18.43%

VI. CULTIVATION (C)14. Open Cultivation (C) 9131.25 11.75%15. Cultivation with tree



remnants (Ct) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (Ce) 16731.25 21.5z%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag) -_0. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) 87.50 (:.11%21. Open Water (OW)

TOTAL OTHERS 87.50 C.11%GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 100.%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 119/4MAPSHEET NAME NYAHUA

------------------------------ __---------------------------------__--


_____________________________---------------------------------------__

r. FOREST3 (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 1-:7.5O 0.18%2. Forest Plantation (Fp) -

TOTAL FOREST (F) 1:7.S0 0:1.19%

II. WOODLAND (W)Z. Dense Woodland (Wd) .S-5':'. 00 45.56%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 469Z'.75 6.0.-4%

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 4004..%75 51.54%

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) 518.75 0.66%6. Dense Bushland (Bd) -7. Open Bushland (So) 1706.25 2.20%


IV. GRASSLAND (G+)S. Open Grassland (S) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 11706.25 15.06%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 12881.25 16.58%



bushes (Mb) 2612.5013. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) -TOTAL MBUGA (M) 9387.50 ±2.08%


crops (Ct) 1.50 C- . :21%16. Cultivation and bush


remnants (Ct) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C*) 1Z18.75 1.70%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag) - -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) - -21. Open Water (OW) - -

TOTAL OTHERS -GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 1 Q(it%

ANNEX 1

AREA COVERAGE DATA Page 54 of 77

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 120/1MAPSHEET NAME NYAHUA RIVER

_________________________--_---_--_------_____________________________


…-----------_----- ___---- --- _______________________________________


TOTAL FOREST (F) 262.50) 0.84%

II. WOODLAND (W)7. Dense Woodland (Wd) 17512.5C 56.:22.4. Open Woodland (Wo) 4137.50 1.528%

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 2165'). Q(3 69. 5 0:%.

III. BUSHLAND (B)S. Thicket (T) 450.00 1.44%6. Dense Bushland (Bd) - -7. Open Bushland (EBo) 12.50 0.04%


IV. GRASSLAND (6+)S. Open Grassland (G) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 5931.25 19.04%1i. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 687.50 2.21%


V. MBUGA (M).11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 1475.00 4.74-,12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) 537.50 1.775'17-. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) - -TOTAL MBUGA (M) 2012.50 6.47,'

VI. CULTIVATION (CC)14. Open Cultivation (C) - -15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb) 143.75 C.46%17. Cultivation and Tree

remnants (Ct) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (Ct) 143.75 0.46%


TOTAL OTHERS GRAND TOTAL AREA 31 150. 00 I')). 00%,.


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 135/2MAPSHEET NAME SIRE

…------------------------------------------------------------------__LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % o- Map

sheet area------------------------------------------------------------------ __-

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) - -2. Forest Plantation (Fp) - _


II. WOODLAND (W):3. Dense Woodland (Wd) - -4. Open Woodland (Wo) 19412.50 62.49%

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 19412.50:) 62.49".

1II. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) -6. Dense Bushland (Ed) -7. Open Bushland (Bo) -

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (6+)8. Open Grassland (G) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 8550.00 27.5/.Y

10. Bushed Grassland (cg) - -TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) 8550.00 27.53%

V. MBUGA (M)II. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 3100.00 9.96%12. Mbuga with Scattered


cultivation (Mc) -TOTAL MBUGA (M) 2100.00 9.98%.

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) - -15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb) - -17. Cultivation and Tree

remnants (Ct) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+)

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Dare Ground (Bag) - -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) -21. Open Water (OW) -

TOTAL OTHERS -GRAND TOTAL AREA 31062. 50 100.0(0Q%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 136/1MAPSHEET NAME SENGA

______________________________________________--_____________________


------------------------------------------------------------------ __-



II. WOODLAND (W)Dense Woodland (Wd) 6518.75 8.:9%

4. Open Woodland (Wo) 46512.50 59.86%TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 53031.25 68.25'

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) -6. Dense Bushland (9d) - -7. OpeJn Bushland (Bo) - -


IV. GRASSLAND (G+)S. Open Grassland (G) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 183016.25 23.56%1.O Bushed Grassland (Bg) 118.75 O.i:

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) 18425.o00 2Z 7MX.


bushes (Mb) 518.75 n.41,1,31. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) -TOTAL MBUGA (M) 6243.75 8.1)4%

VI. CULTIVATION (CC)14. Open Cultivation (C) - -15. Cultivation with tree



remnants (Ct) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+)

VIZ. OTHERS:lS. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag) - -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) -21. Open Water (OW) -

TOTAL OTHERS GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700. 00 1 00l. t0


ARCA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 136/2MAPSHEET NAME WALA RIVER

…--------------------------------------------_____----------------__LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % of Map

sheet area------------------------------------------------------------------ __-

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural rorest (Fn)

Forest Plantation tFp)- TOTAL FOREST (F) -

II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) Z96:2. 50 8. 7%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 41875.QC' : 5:.95%

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 65857.$t, 84. 82,

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (Bd) - -7. Open Bushland (Bo) - -


IV. GRASSLAND (6*)8. Open Grassland (6) 18.75 0).O-%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 6293.75 8.11-%.10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 768.75 0.99%

TOTAL GRASSLAND (6+) 7081.25 9.1-%

V. MBUGA (M)iI. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 4562.50 5.88,'12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) 1U7. 50 0.18%1t. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) -.

TOTAL MBUGA (M) 470C);s:O 0 6%.

VI. CULTIVATION (CC)14. Open Cultivation (C) -15. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) 16. Cultivation and bush

remnants (Cb) -17. Cultivation and Tree

remnants (Ct) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+)

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag) -_70. Grass and Bare Roc;: (Gbr) -1i. Open Water (OW) -

TOTAL OTHERS -GRAND TOTAL AREA 77618.75 100. 00%

A~NNX 1Page 58 of 77

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBEER 137/1MAPSHEET NAME MKOLYE

-…______ _______ ______ _____________________________________________


…----------------------_______------------------------------------__-I. FOREST: (F)

1. Natural Forest (Fn)2. Forest Plantation (Fp)


II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 27C0. 0O0 :9. 21%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 19131.25 24. 63'%

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 4181.25

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T)6. Dense BusMland (Sd)7. Open Bushland (So) 1043.75 1.4%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (9) 1043.75 . 4%

IV. GRASSLAND (6.)S. Open Grassland (G) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 6806.25 8.7S%

10. Bushed Grassland (9g) -TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) 6806.25 8.76%

V. MBUGA (H)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 11237.50 14.46%12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) Z.3 1 5 0.30C%1.3. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 2:CC:.- c)O 2. 57"'TOTAL MBUGA (M) 13468.75 17.

VI. CULTIVATION (C.)14. Open Cultivation (C) l100.C':e 15.57%15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb) 450-0CI 0.-1S,17. Cultivation and Tree


VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag) -2:0. Grass and Bare Rock: (Gbr) -1. Open Water (OW) -

TOTAL OTHERS -GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.0': 99.99%

ANNEX1

?age 59 of 77

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 137/2MARSHEET NAME SIK'ONGE

--------------------------------------------------------------- __----


------------------------------------------------------------------ __-

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn)

Forest'Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F) -

II. WOODLAND (W):3. Dense Woodland (Wd) Z2175 75.75%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 14818.75 19.1-,.t


1IU. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (Bd)7. Open Bushland (Bo) 37.5 ().05%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (C) 37.5 0.05%

IV. GRASSLAND (G+)8. Open Grassland (G) 325 0. 42%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 3743.75 4.85%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) - -

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G*) 4068.75 5.27%.

V. MBUGA (M)a1. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 73f00 9.46%1.12. Mbuga with Scattered


cultivation (Mc) 7400 9.59%TOTAL MBUGA (M) 16900 211.9%

VI. CULTIVATION (C*)14. Open Cultivation (C) 9393.75 12.18-%.15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb) 53-7.50 6.79%17. Cultivation and Tree

remnants (Ct) 193.75 0.25%TOTAL CULTIVATION (C.) 19118.75 24.79%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag)20o. Grass and Bare Rocl: (Gbr) - -21. Open Water (OW) 12.5 0. 02%.

TOTAL OTHERS 12.5 0.0C2%GRAND TOTAL AREA 77131.25 99.99%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER le/1MAPSHEET NAME ISANJA


sheet area------------------------------------------------------------------ __-

1. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn)2. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F) -

II. WOODLAND (W)Z. Dense Woodland (Wd) -661.5C) 43 X.

4. Open Woodland (Wo) 20000. 0') 25. 74%TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 53662.50: 69.C'6%

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) 18.75 O.02%6, Dense Bushland (Bd) -7. Open Bushland (Bo) 981.5 Q.76%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) 300.00 0.8.%

IV. GRASSLAND (Ge)S. Open Grassland (G) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 768.75 0.99%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 331.25 0.43.%

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) 1100.00 1.49-



cultivation (Mc) -TOTAL MBUGA (M) 22187.50 28.56%.

VI. CULTIVATION (Ce)14. Open Cultivation (C) - -15. Cultivation with tree



remnants (Ct) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) -

VII. OTHERS:l8. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag) -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) 450.00 0:.5821. Open Water (OW) -

TOTAL OTHERS 450. 0 ti() 0. 58Z.GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.0') 100%

of 77

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJELT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 138/2MAPSHEET NAME

--------------------------------------------------------------- __----

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) *%. of Mapsheet area

…--------------------------------------------____ -------------------I. FOREST: (F)



II. WOODLAND (W):7. Dense Woodland (Wd) 19068.75 26.46%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 24562.50 74. 08%

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 43631.2S 60.54%

1II. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (8d)7. Open Bushland (6o)

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (G+)S. Open Grassland (G) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 13900.00 19.28%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 5193.75 7.2.1%



bushes (Mb) 5818.75 8.07%1.. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) )TOTAL MBUGA (M) 9343.75 12.96%

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C)15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb)17. Cultivation and Tree

remnants (Ct)TOTAL CULTIVATION (Ci)

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag) --2.0. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) 6.-5 0. 0) 1%21. Open Water (OW) - -

TOTAL OTHERS 6.25 0.01%GRAND TOTAL AREA 72075.00 100%

ANNM 1Page 62 of 77

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 21/ZMAPSHEET NAME BUHAMA


sheet area…--------------..-------------_____---_--_------------------------__-_

1. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn)2. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F) -

II. WOODLAND (W)*W. Dense Woodland (Wd) 156. 25 1.74%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 2`C)75

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 771.-5 4.e80%

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) 6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 325 0.42%7. Open Bushland (So) - -


IV. GRASSLAND (5.)8. Open Grassland (G) 6.265 0.01%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 1006.25 1.70%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) - -



bushes (Mb) - -1. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) - -TOTAL MBUGA (M) 1168.75 1.50%

VI. CULTIVATION (C.)14. Open Cultivation (C) 4'iS.75 5.8-%15. Cultivation with tree




VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag) 18.75 0.02)%20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) 18.75 0.02%-21. Open Water (OW) 63S837.50 82.16%

TOTAL OTHERS 638S56.25 82.18%GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700 99.99,'


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 0C/2MAPSHEET NAME

_____________________________________________________________________


I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 6'.. 17%

Forest Plantation (Fp) -TOTAL FOREST (F) 600'. C 22 . 17 %

II. WOODLAND (W)Dense Woodland (Wd) 3975 14. 3B%

4. Open Woodland (Wo) 4075 14.74%TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 805C 29.12%

'II. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket tT) -6. Dense Bushland (Pd) 8325 30.11%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 2175 7.87%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (9) 1050 37.98%

IV. GRASSLAND (G+)8. Open Grassland (6) 18.75 0.07%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 1162.50 4.20%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 25.00 0.09%



bushes (Mb) 6.25 0.02 %13. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 43..75 0:1.16%TOTAL MBUGA (M) 587.50 2S.12%




remnants (Ct) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 6618.75 27.94'

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag) - -120. Grass and Bare Rock: (Gbr) 87.5 0. X2%21. Open Water (OW) - -

TOTAL OTHERS 87.5 0.32%GRAND TOTAL AREA 27650 100.01%

ANNEX1Page 64 of 77

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAFSHEET NUMBER 3.0/4MAPSHEET NAME

__________________________-----------------------_____________________


1. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 143.75 0.32%2. Forest Plantation tFp) -

TOTAL FOREST (F) 143.75 0.72*/.

rI. WOODLAND (W):3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 1177.5 2.51%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 16581.25 76.62%


rII. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket tT) - _6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 1937.5 4.28%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 6381.25 14.09%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (8) 8318.75 18.3W7%

IV. GRASSLAND (G6)S. Open Grassland (G) -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 56.25 0.12%10. Bushed Grassland (8g) - -




cultivation (Mc) 1250 2.76%TOTAL MBUGA (M) 5887.50 13.01%

VI. CULTIVATION (C.)14. Open Cultivation (C) 68.75 0.15%15. Cultivation with tree



remnants (Ct) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C@) 13150.00 29.0x5%


TOTAL OTHERS - -GRAND TOTAL AREA 45275 100%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 31/1MAPSHEET NAME NYAMIREMBE

------------------------------------------------------------- __------


------------------------------------------------------------------ __-

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 425.00 C:.55%2. Forest Plantation (Fp) - -

TOTAL FOREST (F) 425. cC 0.55%

II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 4837.5 6. %4. Open Woodland (Wo) 8362.5 10.76%


III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thick:et (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (8d) 1656.25 2.13%7. Open Bushland (So) 7043.75 C.07%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) 8700.00 11.1 0%

IV. GRASSLAND (G+)S. Open Grassland (G) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 1656.25 2.13%

10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) .293.75 4.24%TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) 4950.00 6.37%

V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 643.75 C).8S%12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) 293.75 0.78%13. Mb.zga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 8825.00 11.6%.TOTAL MBUGA (M) 9762.50: 12.57%

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 217043.75 Z4.81%15. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) 2400.00 ..:'9%16. Cultivation and bush

remnants (Cb) 8012.50 10:I 1%17. Cultivation and Tree

remnants (Ct) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 37456.25 48.:1%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag) - -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) 1 06.25 0. 14%21. Open Water (OW) 3100 Z.99%

TOTAL OTHERS 3.206.25 4.13%GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700 1 oo.6c:-,2


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 31/2MAPSHEET NAME BUtKONDO

-------- _____-_-------________------------------------------__-------

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) *%. of Mapsheet area

------------------------------------------------------------------ __-


TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd)4. Open Woodland (Wo) 287.50

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 287.50 0.77.

II1. BUSHLAND (B)S. Thicket (T)6. Dense Bushland (8d) 212.50 0.27%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 112.5 0.14%,'


IV. GRASSLAND (6+)8. Open Grassland (G) 6.25 0.01%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) - -10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) -

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) 6.25 0:).01%

V. MBUGA (N)iI. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 2487.50 3. 2C%12. Mbuga with Scattered


cultivation (Mc) 137.50 0.189TOTAL MBUGA (M) 3018.75 %.89%

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 9362.50 i2.05%,'15. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) 1268.75 1.6.%16. Cultivation and bush


remnants (Ct)TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 17125.00 "-.04%

VII. OT HERS:18. Urban Settlement (U)19. Bare Ground (Bag)20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr)21. Open Water (OW) 56937.50 7 .28%.



AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 31/3MAPSHEET NAME IKOKA

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) %. of Mapsheet area

------------------------------------------------------------------ __-

I. fOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn)2. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F) -

II. WOODLAND (W)Dense Woodland (Wd) 856.25 1.10%

4. Open Woodland (Wo) 2600 .s5%TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 3456.25 4.45%

III. BUSHLAND (2)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 7518.75 9.68%7. Open Bushland (Po) 10125.00 13.03%.


rV. GRASSLAND (G*)8. Open Grassland (G)9. Wooded Glahsland (Wg) -

10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 7S68.75 10.13%TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) 7868.75 10.13%


bushes (Mb) 3925. 00 5.C5%1'. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 1700 2.19%TOTAL MPUGA (M) 5837.50 7.51%

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 27700 -75.65%l.15. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) .'35 0:..42%,16. Cultivation and bush


remnants (Ct) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C.) 42893.75 55.211.

VIZ. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Pag) - -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) - --1.. Open Water (OW) - -

TOTAL OTHERS - -GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700 100.01D,.


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 31/4MAPSHEET NAME NYAKAGOMEA


---------------------------------------------- _______----------_-___-

I. FORESTs (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 543.75 0.70%2. Forest Plantation (Fp) - -



TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 16,987.50 21.86%

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 987.50 1.'27%7. Open Bushland (80) 1025.00 1.32%


IV. GRASSLAND (G+)8. Open Grassland (G) 12.50 0.02%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) - -10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) ,





VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 24118.75 -1.04%15. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) 400 0.52%16. Cultivation and bush

remnants (Cb) 153=1.25 19.73%17. Cultivation and Tree

remnants (Ct) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (Ce) 39850 51.29%

VII. OTHERS:1G. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag) -20. Grass and Bare Rock: (Gbr) 7731.25 9.95%21. Open Water (OW) - -

TOTAL OTHERS 7731.25 9.95%GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 100%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 72/1MAPSHEET NAME NZERA

---------------------- _--_____---__-------------------_____--_-------


…-----------------------------------------------------------------__-I. FOREST: (F)

1. Natural Forest (Fn) 206.25 0.27%Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F) 2C16. 25 ''.7%

II. WOODLAND (W)Dense Woodland (Wd) l3.S) 1S.9'.

4. Open Woodland (Wo) 1068.75 - .TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 14218.75 18.707%

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense BLtshland (Bd) 31.25 01. 04%7. Open Bushland (So) 281.25 C0.Z6,.


IV. GRASSLAND (G+)8. Open Grassland (G) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) - -10. Bushed Grassland (89) - -

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G*) -

V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 6950 8.94%12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) 1731.25 .

1. Mbuga with scatteredcultivation (Mc) z5a1.25 4.61%TOTAL MBUGA (M) 12262.5 15.78%

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cuitivation (C) W.643.75 42.0:1%15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb) 149Z.75 16.08%17. Cultivation and Tree


VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) 1q. Bare Ground (Bag)20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) l2.5 C,:) , '-1. Open Water (OW) 5487.5 7. (0'-6%

TOTAL OTHERS 5500.00 7.08%GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 1:0%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PRCJECT SEGMENT TAEBORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 32/2MAPSHEET NAME NYEHUNGE

------ ---------------- __________________ _-------…--------------------LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % of Map

sheet area------------------------------------------------------------------ __-


TOTAL FOREST (F) 12.5 Q. 02%".

II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 1925 2.4e%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 4587.5 5.90%*.


11I. BUSHLAND (9)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (3d) 50 0.06%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 4375 5.63%


IV. GRASSLAND (G+)8. Open Grassland (G) 6.25 0.01%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 25 0.03%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 12.5 0.02%

TOTAL GRASSLAND (GI) 43.75 0. 06%



cultivation (Mc) 1025.00 1.532%TOTAL MDUGA (M) 3093.75 3.98%

VI. CULTIVATION CC+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 41912.5 53.94%15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb) 21700 t27.93%17. Cultivation and Tree


VIr. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U)19. Bare Ground (Bag) - -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) - -21. Open Water (OW) - -

TOTAL OTHERS - -GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700 100%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 32/3MAPSHEET NAME GEITA

_____________________________________________________________________


_____________________________________________________________________

I. FORESTs (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 2856.25 3.68%A. Forest Plantation (Fp) - -

TOTAL FOREST (F) 2S56.25 .68%.

II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 18987.5 24.44%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 4475 5.76%

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 2-3462.5 30.2C)%

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) - -8. Dense Bushland (8d) 4981.25 6.41%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 3181.25 4.09%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (6) 8162.5 lo.S50%

IV. GRASSLAND (Ge)8. Open Grassland (G) 1975 Z.54%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 1450 1.87%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 7856.25 10.11%,'

TOTAL GRASSLAND (Ge) 11281.25 14.52%


bushes (Mb) 288.75 0.3-5%13. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 600 C0.7 7TOTAL MBUGA (M) '3381.25 4.35%

VI. CULTIVATION (CC)14. Open Cultivation (C) 15412.5 19.84%.15. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) 122 1.2,8%16. Cultivation and bush

remnants (Cb) 1074Z.77 15.83%17. Cultivation and Tree

remnants (Ct) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C-) 27 7 1.-5 75. 5%

vrI. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U)19. Bare Ground (Bag)20. Grass and Bare Rock: (Gbr)2-1. Open Water (OW) 1175 1.51%

TOTAL OTHERS 1175 1.51%,GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700 100.).01%

AX 1 '''Page 72 of 77

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 32/4MAPSHEET NAME KASAMWA


------------------------------------------------------------------ __-

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 125 0.16%2. Forest Plantation (Fp) - _

TOTAL FOREST (F) 125 0.16%.

II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 7800 10.04%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 6512.5 8.38z%

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 14312.5 18.4-2%

III. BUSHLAND (B)S. Thicket (T) -6. Dense Bushland (Ed) 1Z68.75 1.76%S7. Open Bushland (Bo) 5650 7.27%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) 7018.75 9.0:71,'

IV. GRASSLAND (G+)8. Open Grassland (G) 250 0.32,'9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) - -

10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 4087.5 5.26%TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) 4337.5 5.58%.

V. MBUGA (M)I1. Mbuga with grass (mg) 2131.25 2.74%12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) 637.5 C.82%I'. Mbuga with scattered






VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag)20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) -21. Open Water (OW) 50 0). 06%

TOTAL OTHERS 50 0.06%GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700 99.99%

AM=EX 1Page 73 of 77

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 19/7MAPSHEET NAME MUGANZA


------------------------------------------------------------------ __-

I. FOREST: CF)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 493.75 0.647.2. Forest Plantation (Fp) -


II. WOODLAND (W)Dense Woodland (Wd) 11693.75 15.05%.

4. Open Woodland (Wo) ..0477.S 0 9. 17'".TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 42131.25 54 .22.

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) -6. Dense Bushland (td) -7. Open Bushland (So) 62.5 0.08%


IV. GRASSLAND (G+)8. Open Grassland (G) -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 3662.5 4.71%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 725 6.93%



bushes (Mb) 2643.75 4(:.%13. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 406.25 0:).52%TOTAL MBUGA (M) 4912.5 6.7.-',

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 5593.75 7.20%.15. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) 106.25 C0.414%16. Cultivation and bush

remnants (Cb) 6618.75 8.52%-17. Cultivation and Tree

remnants (Ct) TOTAL CULrIVATION (C+) 12318.75 15.86%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag)20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) - -21. Open Water (OW) 1393. 75 17.24%


ANX 1Page 74 of 77

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 19/4MAPSHEET NAME BUTWALSLAND

_____________________________________________________________________

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) V. o0 Mapsheet area


TOTAL FOREST (F) -

II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 1e862.5 24.28%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 787.5 1.01%


I2I. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket tT) -6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 275 0.35%7. Open Bushland (So)


IV. GRASSLAND (6+)8. Open Grassland (G) -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 1600 2.06%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) -

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) 1600 2.06-.

V. MBUGA (K)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 987.5 1.27%.12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) -1. Mbuga with scattered -

cultivation (Mc)TOTAL MEUGA CM) 987.5 1.27%-

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 2293.75 2.9S%15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb) 18i8.75 2.414.17. Cultivation and Tree

remnants (Ct) 168.75 0.."%TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 4331.5 5.58%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Sag) - -Q . Grass and Bare Rock> (Gbr) '3C6. 5 f.. 9%

21. Open Water (OW) 5s:550 65. C5%TOTAL OTHERS 50856.25 65.45%GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700 100%

AN 1IPage 75 of 77

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA MAPSHEET NUMBER 20/3MAPSHEET NAME KAHUNDA

---------------------------------------------------------------- __---


------------------------------------------------------------------ __-

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 1418.75 1.83%2. Forest Plantation (Fp) 3243.75 4.17%'


II. WOODLAND (W).:1 . Dense Woodland (Wd) .31.25 4.29%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 6668.75 8.53%

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 1 0000. 0C 172. 8 7%

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 2656.25 :3.42%.7. Open Bushland (So) 412.50 C0.574%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) 3068.75 .95%

IV. GRASSLAND (G+)8. Open Grassland (G)9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 262.50 0.34%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 12.50 0.02%


V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 943.75 1.-2%12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) - -1I. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 25.00 v. C) ITOTAL MBUGA (M) 968.75 1. I'

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 8175 1 0.5 %15. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) 725 0. .93.%16. Cultivation and bush

remnants (Cb) 5468.75 7.04%.17. Cultivation and Tree

remnants (Ct) 600.00 0.77%TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 14968.75 19.-6%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag)20. Grass and Bare Rock: (Gbr)21. Open Water (OW) 4S756.25 56. 31.%

TOTAL OTHERS 43756.25 5S6.-1,GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700 99.99%


AREA COVERAGE DATA


------------------------ __________________________________________


…---__ - -- -- - -- --___-- - -- ---- …----…- __--------------

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 750.00 C. 97%2. Forest Plantation (Fp) -

TOTAL FOREST (F) 750.00 0.1.97%

II. WOODLAND (W):3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 1550.00 1.99%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 2418.75

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) .968.75 5.1c:0%

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 7106.25 9.15%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 5112.50 6.58%


IV. GRASSLAND (G+)S. Open Grassland (G) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) - -10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 43.75 0.06%



bushes (Mb) 1468.75 1.89%1U. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) - -TOTAL MBUGA (M) 3093.75 -.98,'

VI. CULTIVATION (C)14. Open Cultivation (C) 13481.25 17. 5%15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb) 0l1l8.25 1,.1o%17. Cultivation and Tree

remnants (Ct) .318.75 0.41'%TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 3981. 25 70. 86%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Pare Ground (Bag)20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) -21. Open Water (OW) Z3643.7! 4-.70%

TOTAL OTHERS t843.75 4-. 7.0%GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700CI0. 00%


SUMMARY SHEET

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT TABORA/MWANZA

…-----------------------------_-----------------------------_____----

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % of Segmentarea

_____-______________________________________________________________I. FOREST: (F)

1. Natural Forest (Fn) 22031.25 c:,.442. Forest Plantation (Fp) 3431.25 0.07

SUB-TOTAL 25462.5 0.51

II. WOODLAND (W)3: . Dense Woodland (Wd) 12`3650 24.784. Open Woodland (Wo) 734437.5 14.72

SUB-TOTAL 1970787.5 .9.5

TII. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket CT) 1718.75 0.036. Dense Bushland (Bd) 83725 1.687. Open Bushland (Bo) 162775 3.26

SUB-TOTAL 248218.75 4.97

IV. GRASSLAND (G+)8. Open Grassland (G) . 3650 0.079. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 145600 2.92

10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 92256.25 1.85SUB-TOTAL 241506.25 4.84

V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 217468.75 4.3612. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) 230075 4.611.. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 164456.25SUB-TOTAL 612000 12.27

VI. CULTIVATION tC+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 1018356.25 20.4115. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) 41056.25 0.8216. Cultivation and bush


remnants (Ct) 1854Z.75 0.38SUB-TOTAL 1540012.5 zz0.87

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) Z.37.5 t.07

19. Bare Ground (Bag) 212.5 0:).0120. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) 2693.75 0.0Z21. Open Water (OW) 346737.5 6.95

SUB-TOTAL .. 49981.25 7.02GRAND TOTAL AREA 4988968.75 99.98

ANNEX 2Page o of 6

II. IRINGA SEGMENT AREA STATISTICS

2.1 This volume presents data on the absolute, and relative areacoverages of the various land cover types found in the Tabora/Mwanzasegment. The data is presented in tabular form-each page sheetcontaining data for a named mapsheec area.

2.2 The format of the cables is che same for all of the 8 mapsheetareas covered in the Iringa survey. On the first and second coLumns ofthe tables appear names of the major land cover categories and theirconstituent "types", respectively. The third and fourth columns containdata indicating the absolute area coverage (in hectares) and the relativearea coverage (as percentage of the map sheet area), respectively, ofeach of the named land cover categories and constituent land cover types.

2.3 Brief definitions of the various terms used in the tabLes todescribe the land cover categories and "type" are given below. Thedefinitions are adopted from the classification by Pratt et al, (1966).

A'YNEX 2Page 2 of 14


-______ --- _------_---_------_---------------------------------

CATEGORY LAND COVER TYPES…---------------------------------------------------------------

i FOREST (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn)

2. Mangrove Foresrs (Fn)(m)

3. Forest Planration (FD)________________________________________________________________

1 WOODLAND (W): 4. Oense Woodland (wd)

5. Ooen Woodland (Wo)________________________________________________________________

IIl OUSHLAND (8): 6. rhicket (T)

7. Dense Oushland (8d)

8. Open 3ushaland (So)

IV GRASSLAND (G): 9. Ooen Grassland (G)


11. aJushed Grassland (8g)

V MSUGA (M): 12. Mt,uga with grass (Mg)




16. Cultivation with treecroos (Ct)



VII OTHERS 19. Urban settlement (U)

20. Bareground (Sag)

21. Salt 3areground (Bags)(s)


23. Open water (Ow)

ANTEX 2Page 3 of 14


Ci)FOREST (F): Tree cover with closed canopy of one or more strata. Threetypes of forest were distinguished:

(ii) Natural Forests (Fn): Lianas and epiphytes are common.There may be a dense undergrowth of herbs and shrubs wherethe canopy is not dense enough to exclude light. Where lightis excLuded, characteristically, grass are sparse andlocalized. No distiction was made between Montane, Riverineand other types of high forests etc.

Ciii) Mangrove Forests (Fn(m): An association of physiologicallyspecialized plants inhabiting muddy swamps, creeks, deltasand sheltered shores along tropical sea coasts, periodicallyinundated by tides. Mangrove forests may be closed or openand they can be either pure or consist of a mixture of twoor more species. Mangroves along the East African Coast maycontour up to nine species belonging to six families.

(iv) Forest Plantations (Fp): IncLudes all categories ofartificial forests.

(a) WOODLAND (W): An assemblage of trees with a canopy cover of morethan 20X. The canopy may be continuous, but not thicklyinterlaced. Grass and herbs dominate the ground cover. Two typesof woodlands were distinguishable on the imagery:

Ci) Dense woodland ("d): Refers to woodland with canopy cover ofmore than 50X. Ideally a medium dense woodland category shouldhave been included in the legend, but identification of thecategory on the imagery was found to be inconclusive. Thecategory was therefore merged with dense woodland.

(ii) Open woodland (Wo): Refers to woodland with canopy cover ofless than 502.

(b) BUSHLAND (B): A assemblage of shrubs, (below 4m height) mostlymultistemed, with a canopy cover of more than 201. Three types ofbushlands are distinguishable on the imagery.


(ii) Dense bushland (Bd): Refers to bushland with canopy cover ofabove 501. Similar to the woodland a medium dense bushlandcategory should have been included in the legend, butidentification of the category on the imagery was found to beinconclusive. The category was therefore merged with densebushland.

AhN EX 2Page 4 of 14

(iii) Open bushland (Bo): Refers to bushland with canopy cover ofless than 50Z.

(c) GRASSLAND (G): Land dominated by grassland and occasionally otherherbs; sometimes with widely scattered or grouped trees and shrubs,the canopy cover of which does not exceed 2Z. In this study, thecategory is distinguished as Land cover type 9 i.e. opengrassLand. Where the tree or shrub canopy is between 2-20X, twoother categories are distinguished depending on the habic of thewoody component:

(i) Wooded grassland (Wg): Scattered trees with canopy coverbetween 2-20X

(ii) Bushed grassland (Bg): Scattered shrubs with canopy coverbetween 2-20Z. Distinction between Wg and 3g highly depends onground information.

(d) MBUCA (M): A Tanzanian term for a low flat grassy plain of "blackcotton" soil with impeded drainage. Three land cover types aredistinguished under this category:

(i) Mbuga with grass (Mg): This is essentially grassland within ambuga.



(e) CULTIVATION (C): Areas of farming. Distinction is made as follows:

Ci) Open Cultivation (C): land dorminated by pure food cropcultivation.


(iii) Cultivation and bush remnants (Cb): Cultivation interpersedwith stands of bush.


(f) OTHERS: This category includes those which could not be fitted inany of the foregoing categories. They include:


ANNNEX 2Page 5 of 14

(ii.) Bareground (Bag): This could be a result of land degradationprocesses; human activities, or natural processes.

(iii) Salt Bareground (Bag(s)): This category covers saLtybareground, which is mainly along the coast and normallyinterpressed with mangrove vegetation.

(iv) Grass and bare rock (Cbr): These are Large rock outcrops whichare partly covered by grass while other portions are bare rockoutcrops.


ANNEX 2


PROJECT SEGMENT IRINGA MAPSHEET NUMBER 277/1MAPSHEET NAME rPOKERA

--------------------- _-_--_--------------------______________________

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % of mapsheet area

---------------------------------- __----------_--_------_-___-----__

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn)2. Forest Plantation (Fp) 48e.25 0:'.64%'.

TOTAL FOREST (F) 481.5T 0. 64%'.

II. WOODLAND (W)7. Dense Woodland (Wd) 2:5.0:n:' *

4. Open Woodland (Wo) _TOTAL WOODLAND (W) Z5. 6: 0. :t:%

1II. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicl;:et (T) -6. Dense Sushland (E') 862.50r 1.15'%7. Open Bushland (So) 575.0u0 (:Q.77%

rOTAL EUSHLAND (B) 1437.50 1.9'0,

IV. GLASSLAND (G+)S. Open Grassland (G) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) - -I0. Bushed Grassland (9g) - -

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) - -

V. MBUGA (1)I1. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 443.75 0.59%12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) - -13. Mbuga with Scattered

cultivation (Mc) 3918.75 5.24%".TOTAL MBUGA CM) 4362.50 5.93%

vr. CULTIVATION CC+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 62262.5015. Cultivation with tree


remnants (CB) 6:31.8-17. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (CT) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 68493.75 91.7'

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U)19. Bare Ground (Bag)

Grass and $are Rock (Gbr)21. Open Water (OW)

TOTAL OTHER -GRAND TOTAL AREA 74800.00 99.99%

ANMEX 2Page 7 of 14

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT IRINGA MAPSHEET NUMBER 197/.-.MAPSHEET NAME CHAMDINDI

------------------------------ ___---------__------------___--___------

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % oi Mapsheet area

------------------------------------------------------------------ __--

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 6.25 Q. 1

Forest Plantation (Fp) -TOTAL FOREST (F) 6.25 Q. 1' 1

II. WOODLAND (W)*z. Dense Woodland (Wd) 21756.25 29 *.-1.4. Open Woodland (Wo) 10518.75 1.69%

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 7=75.00 42.01%',

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) -6. Dense Bushland (Bd) -7656.25 . .9S%7. Open Bushland (So) 25906.25 ._.59%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) -8862.50 :7.57%

IV. GLASSLAND (G+)8. Open Grassland (G) 412.50 0.54%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 762.50 0.99%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) - -


V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) _487.50 . 4%.12. Mbuga with Scattered


cultivation (Mc) 1325.00 1.72%TOTAL MPUGA CM) 4225.00 5. 50%



remnants (CS) 1875.00 2.44%17. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (CT) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C.) 10287.50 1.739,.

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U)19. Bare Ground (Bag)20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr)-1. Open Water (OW)

TOTAL OTHER -GRAND TOTAL AREA 7681.25 1 00.0C. 1 %

ANNEX 2Page 8 of 14

AREA COVERAGE DAT P o

PROJECT SEGMENT IRINGA MAPSHEET NUMBER 197/4MAPSHEET NAME NYANGORO

------- ______________________---______________________


…-------------_______--------------_-----------------------___________

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn)t.6-, Forest Plantation (Fp)


II. WOODLAND (W)Dense Woodland (Wd) 1 1087.50: =4.S-.'

4. Open Woodland (Wo) 5o4 .75 I I 1:50;;TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 161h1..'

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T)6. Dense Busmland (Bd) e7.87 507. Open Bushland (Bo) 64.1.25 *14.:8%


IV. GLASSLAND (G+)8. Open Grassland (G) 81.25 0.18%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) - -10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 2512.50 5.58"I.


V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 6.25 O*. 02%'12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) -1. Mbuga with Scattered

cultivation (Mc) -TOTAL MBUGA (M) 8.25 02. z.

VI. CULTIVATION (CC)14. Open Cultivation (C) 1749.7.75 29.97%15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (CS) 5987.5D 5 .30%17. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (CT) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 19481.25 47.27%'


TOTAL OTHER - -GRAND TOTAL AREA 45031.-5 10C3.01m%

ANNEX 2Page 9 of 14

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT IRINGA MAPSHEET NUMBER :14/4MAPSHEET NAME LUTEME

…-------------------- - ____ --_- _____________________________


----------------------------------------------------------------------

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn)Z. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W)Dense Woodland (Wd) 12650.C0 16.41"1

4. Open Woodland (Wo) 9237.50 11.98%TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 1387.50 8.-9

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) -6. Dense Bushland (Ed) 1:.1.25 7.17%'.7. Open Bushland (Eo) 3787.5C) 4. .9%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (E) 3518.75 4.56%

IV. GLASSLAND (G6)8, Open Grassland (G) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 1937.50 2.5'1%

10. Bushed Grassland (8g)TOTAL GRASSLAND (Gl) 1937.50 2.51%

VI MBUGA CM)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 587.50 (0.76%12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) -1z. Mbuga with Scattered

cultivation (Mc) 16700.00 01.SS%TOTAL MBUGA (M) 17'37.5 : :2.42,.

VI. CULTIVATION (C.)14. Open Cultivation (C) 98:25. 00 I 7"%15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (CS) 2--6.Z1.S I. ^,17. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (CT)TOTAL CULTIVATION 'C+) 7:456.25 4-.11%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag)2:0. Grass and Bare Rocl: (Gbr)-1. Open Water (OW)

TOTAL OTHER -GRAND TOTAL AREA 77087.50 99.99%

ANNEX 2Page-10 of 14

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT IRINGA MAPSHEET NUMBER 215/1MAPSHEET NAME MWAYA

------- __--------_______-_________------___---------_______________-____

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) ' of Mapsheet area

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) -

Forest Plantation CFp) 25c. ':,)-%TOTAL FOREST (F) -5.C:) .0

II. WOODLAND (W)Dense Woodland (Wd) 14518.75 ...... .

4. Open Woodland (Wo) 14987.5CZ 19. :TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 295C6.25 7.98%

III. BUSHLAND (8)5. Thicket (T) - _6. Dense Butshland (8d) 56.25 0.0%57. Open Bushland (So) .71S.7-s 4.7%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (8) :775. C00 4. Z4%

IV. GLASSLAND (S+)8. Open Grassrand (G) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 50.0Q (.06%A.10. Bushed Grassland (9g) 312.550 Q.4t.) %.

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) :62. 50, .46/.

V. MBUGA (M) I11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 690.75 (:.8.9%12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) -1_. Mbuga with Scattered

cultivation (Mc) 562.50 0.72%TOTAL MBUGA (M) 1I56.5 1.S1,'.



remnants (CS) - -61:.5ci -C.- .917. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (CT) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C.) 4:.175.00 55.57%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag) - -2C. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) - -21. Open Water (OW) - -

TOTAL OTHER - -GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 99.99%

ANNEX 2Page 1l of 14

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT IRINGA MAPSHEET NUMBER =!Si:MAPSHEET NAME ISMANI

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) " of mapsheet area

-------------------------------------------- _---------------------__--


2. Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W)Dense Woodland (Wd) 9C'C :. .

4. Open Woodland (Wo) 115 4,'TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 8C50 S%

III. BUSHLAND (B)S. Thicket (T)6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 56.-5 :C. 16%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 8843.75 25.5%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) 89e: 25.66%

IV. 6LASSLAND (G4-)8. Open Grassland (G) -9. Wooded Glassland (WQ) -

10. Bushed Grassland (8g) 1494.75 4.-1%TOTAL GRASSLAND (G.) 1493.75 4._1%

V. MEBUA (tM)1i. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 7. 0:%l^. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb)1,. Mbuga with Scattered

cultivation (Mc) 968.75 2.79%,TOTAL MBUGA (M) 1668.75 4.81%

Vr. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 15256.25 43.9R%15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (CS) 534 .75 15.41,'17. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (CT) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) :600o.rO 59.39%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag)* :0. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr-21. Open Water (OW)

TOTAL OTHERGRAND TOTAL AREA 34687.5


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT IRINGA MAPSHEET NUMBER 21/siMAPSHEET NAME IRINGA

------- _______----------------------------------------------------_-___


-----. _-_______--------------------------------------_--____----__-----


Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F) -

II. WOODLAND (W)7. Dense Woodland (Wd) -4. Open Woodland (Wo) 274Z.75

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 274o.75

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket CT)6. Dense Bushland (8d) 825.00 1. 06%7^. Open BLushland (Co) 8825.00: 11.:6

TOTAL BUSHLAND (5) 9650.00 1 .4_/.

IV. GLASSLAND (G4)S. Open Grassland (G) -9. Wooded Glassland (Wj) 1162.50

10. Bushed Grassland CBg)TOTAL GRASSLAND (G.) 1162.50 1.50%

V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) ^t.75. 00 7 . t S',',1i. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) 1.25 0. .4%.1:'. Mbuga with Scattered

cultivation (Mc) _9I.5 4.TOTAL MBUGA (M) 5687.5 7. 2%

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) S970C0.00 51.09%15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (CB) 17700.00 -:.78%17. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (CT) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C4) 57400.00 77.97%

VII. OTHERS:1B. Urban Settlement (U) 1050.00 1.-'',19. Bare Ground (Bag) -20. Grass and Bare Rock: (Gbr) -21. Open Water (OW) 6.25 0. 1,.

TOTAL OTHER 1056.25 1.-6%GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700 .00 1 00:.


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT IRINGA MAPSHEET NUMBER '232/MAiSHEET NAME ULETE

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % oF Mapsheet area

S. FOREST: (F)1. Natutral Forest (Fn)

Forest Plantation (Fp) 650. 0t0 ().84,'TOTAL FOREST (F) 650.: 01) . su4'

II. WOODLAND (W)Dense Woodland (Wd) 1571.:5 '.97

4. Open Woodland (Wo) 168.75 C). 22'.TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 1700.00

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T)6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 8562.550 11. 0,7. Open Bushland (Bo) 111956.25 15. f 9%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (8) 20518.75 2-6.41%.

IV. GLASSLAND (G+)S. Open Grassland (G) 5S7.50 0,.9-'.9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) -10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 1912.50

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) 245S.00 . 15%.

V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 1906.25 -. 45%12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) I 187.50 '.',1i. Mbuga with Scattered

cultivation (Mc) 1787.50 .70"TOTAL MBUGA (M) 4881.=5

VI. CULTIVATION (Ci)14. Open Cultivation (C) -4975. 00 14-i1S. Cultivation with tree


remnants (CB) '22525.00' 8. 97.117. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (CT) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C.) 4750..00 S1. 1 -.

VII. OTHERS:le. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag) - -:0. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) - -:1. Open Water (OW) - -

TOTAL OTHER GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700. 00 i 0n. 0017.

AW.EX 2

SUMMARY SHEET Page 14 of 14

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT IRINGA

------ ______--------------------------------------------------__------

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) %. ofSegment area

-------------------------------------------------------------- ____--._--

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) S.5

Fcrest Plantation (Fp) 1156.25 0. 2 iSUB-TOTAL 1162.5 (1.22

II. WOODLAND (W)7 . Dense Woodland (Wd) 6:468.75 1'. 54"

4. Open Woodland (Wo) 4.825 P.0q%SUB-TOTAL 1C'629-.?7 1975_'.

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (Sd) 1.9.7.5 2.'.7%Z

7. Open Bushland (So) 6914" ... 75 12.77'SUB-TOTAL 87081.25 15.4%

IV. GLASSLAND (G+)8. Open Grassland (G) 1031.25 Ci. 19-9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) :3912.5 C'.7 7

10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 6271.5 t.,c5SUB-TOTAL 11175.6

;V. I"lENMBUGA (M)il. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 900 1..7%1i. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) 16Z1.25U.. Mbuga with Scattered

cultivation (Mc) . 854Z..75SUB-TOTAL 9775 7.27

VI. CULTIVATION (C.)14. Open Cultivation (C) 19-487.5 7'.7 *15. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) -1$. Cultivation and bush

remnants (CB) 1(059t.6.25 1 9.56%17. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (CT)SUB-TOTAL 29939:.75 55. -9,

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) 1050: l ( 1:19. Bare Ground (Sag)20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) -1. Open Water (OW) 6.=5

SUB-TOTAL 10'56.2 05. l4-GRAND TOTAL AREA 541557.5 lvO%

ANNEX 3Page 1 of 35

III. ARUSHA SEGMENT AREA STATISTICS

3.1 This volume presents data on the absoLute, and relative areacoverages of the various land cover types found in che Tabora/Mwanzasegment. The data is presented in tabular form-each page sheetcontaining data for a named mapsheec area.

3.2 The format of the tables is the same for all of the 28 mapsheetareas covered in che Arusha survey. On che first and second columns ofthe tables appear names of the major land cover categories and theirconstituent "types", respectively. The third and fourth columns containdata indicating the absolute area coverage (in hectares) and the relativearea coverage (as percentage of the map sheet area), respectively, ofeach of the named land cover categories and constituent land cover types,

3.3 Brief definitions of the various terms used in the tables todescribe the land cover categories and "type" are given below. Thedefinitions are adopted from the classification by Pratt et al, (1966).

A4NNEX 3Page 2 of 35


____________ - -----------------------------------------------


FOREST (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn)

2. Mangrove Forests (Fn)(m)------------------ _-------_________

3. Forest Plantetion (Fp)________________________________________________________________

If WOODLAND (W): 4. Dense Woodland (Wd)-------------------------------- _--


IlI BUSHLAND (B): 6. Thicket (T)

.7. Dense Bushland (Bd)

8. Open Busnaland (80)

IV GRASSLAND (G): 9. Ooen Grassland (G)


11. Bushed Grassland (B9)

V m"GA (M): 12. Mbuga with grass (Mg)


14. Nbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc)


16. Cultivation with treecroos (Ct)

17. Cultivation and bushremnants ECb)

18. Cultivation and tree

remnants (CT)

VlI OTHE2 19. Urban settlement (U)

20. Sareground (Sag)

21. Salt Sareground (Sags)(s)


23. Open water (Ow)

ANNEX 3Page 3 of 35

3.4 The following are simplified definitions of terms in the Legendshown in Table 3. The definitions are adopted from the classification byPratt et al (1966).

(a)FOREST (F): Tree cover with closed canopy of one or more strata. Threetypes of forest were distinguished:




(b) WOODLAND (W): An assemblage of trees with a canopy cover of morethan 20Z. The canopy may be continuous, but not thicklyinterlaced. Crass and herbs dominate the ground cover. Two typesof woodlands were distinguishable on the imagery:

(i) Dense woodland (Wd): Refers to woodland with canopy cover ofmore than 501. Ideally a medium dense woodland category shouldhave been included in the legend, but identification of thecategory on the imagery was found to be inconclusive. Thecategory was therefore merged with dense woodland.

(ii) Open woodland (Wo): Refers to woodland with canopy cover ofless than 501.

(c) BUSHLAND (B): A assemblage of shrubs, (below 4m height) mostlymultistemed, with a canopy cover of more than 201. Three types ofbushlands are distinguishable on the imagery.


(ii) Dense bushland (Bd): Refers to bushland with canopy cover ofabove 50%. Similar to the woodland a medium dense bushlandcategory should have been included in the legend, butidentification of the category on the imagery was found to beinconclusive. The category was therefore merged with densebushland.

ANNEX 3Page 4 of 35

(iii) Open bushland (80): Refers to bushland with canopy cover ofless than 50Z.

(d) GRASSLAND (G): Land dominated by grassland and occasionally otherherbs; sometimes with widely scattered or grouped trees and shrubs,the canopy cover of which does not exceed 2%. In this study, thecategory is distinguished as land cover type 9 i.e. opengrassland. Where the cree or shrub canopy is between 2-20%, twoother categories are distinguished depending on the habit of thewoody component:


(ii) Bushed grassland (Bg): Scattered shrubs with canopy coverbetween 2-20%. Distinction between Wg and Bg highly depends onground information.

(e) MBUGA (M): A Tanzanian term for a low flat grassy plain of "blackcotton"' soil with impeded drainage. Three Land cover types aredistinguished under this category:


(ii) Mbuga with Scattered bush (Nb)


(f) CULTIVATION (C): Areas of farming. Distinction is made as foLlows:

Mi) Open Cultivation (C): land dorminated by pure food cropcultivation.


(iii) Cultivation and bush remnants (Cb): Cultivation interpersedwith stands of bush.


(g) OTHERS: This category includes those which couLd not be fitted inany of the foregoing categories. They include:


ANNEX 3Page 5 of 35

(ii) Bareground (Bag): This could be a result of land degradationprocesses; human activities, or natural processes.

(iii) Salt Bareground (Bag(s)): This category covers saltybareground, whichi is mainly along the coast and normallyinterpressed with mangrove vegetation.

(iv) Grass and bare rock (Cbr): These are large rock outcrops whichare partly covered by grass while other portions are bare rockouccrops.


Pa,e'Eof 35

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA MAPSHEET NUMBER 106/2MAPSHEET NAME ENGERRINI

-------------------------------------------- _______.

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % 04 Mapsheet ared

S.FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn)

Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W),Z. Dense Woodland (Wd) 56.25 07/4. Open Woodland (WC) 3512.50 4.52%

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) -568.75 4.59%

IIr. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thic[et (T)6. Dense Butshland (Bd) 35950.00 46.227%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 144S6.25 18.60"

TOTAL BUSHLAND (8) 50406.25 64.87%

IV. - GLASSLAND (Ge)a. Open Glassland (G) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 7825.0C 1 C10. Bushed Glassland (Bg) 5056.2 5.Sl,

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) 12881.25 16.5t3%

V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 7856.25I. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) 2-987.50 .85.1. Mbuga with scattered


VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C)1S. Cultivation with tree


remnants (CS)17. Cultivation and Tree

remnants (CT) -

TOTAL CULTIVATION (C.)

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U)19. Bare Ground (Sag)2t. Grass and Bare Rockc (Gbr)21. Open Water (OW)

TOTAL OTHERSGRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 1001. 0'Y

ANNEX 3AREA COVERAGE DATA Page 7 of 35

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA MAPSHEET NUMBER 106/lMAPSHEET NAME MAKAMI

-------------------- __--------------_____-------------___________.LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % of Map

sheet area…-----------------------------------------------------------------__-.

I. FORESTs (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn)2. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W)Dense Woodland (Wd) 21 6 6.25 7 -

4. Open Woodland (Wo) 125.I& 50.16"TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 2 21.25 2.925'.

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T)6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 19Z7 .5 2.54%7. Open Bushland (So) 41568.75 54.49%'.

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) 4Z506. 25 57.0 ,%'.

IV. GLASSLAND (G+)S. - Open Grassland (G) -9. Wooded Grassland (Wg) 681.25 t.89-10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 21175.00 27.76%

TOTAL GRASSLAND 21856.25 28.65%.

V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 854;.75 11.20%12. Mbuga with Scattered


cultivation (Mc)TOTAL MBUGA (M) 854:.75 11.2I0



remnants (CS)17. Cultivation and Tree

remnants (CT)TOTAL CULTIVATION (C.)

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U)19. Bare Ground (Bag) 150.0::') 0. :5'.%20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) -21. Open Water (OW) -

TOTAL OTHERS 150 0:. 2.C%GRAND TOTAL AREA 76287.5 1 0(. 00%.

ANNEX 3Page 8 of 35

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA MAPSHEET NULMER 1 c:4/2MAPSHEET NAME MASANGE

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % 0f Mapsheet area

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) *- S2. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F) 12J5 * ':12%

II. WOODLANP (W)Dense Woodland (Wd) 12762.5 ls.47%

4. Open Woodland (Wd) 5556.25 7.17%TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 1 8 1 8. 75 _ _ . b4"

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thick:et tT) -6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 4487.5 '.79-

Open Bvshland (So) 1656.25 .14%TOTAL BUSHLAND (BE 614..75 7-7-%

IV. GLASSLAND (6+)S. Open Grassland (G)9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 1 Q. 1I7%1C. Bushed Glassland (9g) i2.5 C). 02C'%

TOTAL GRASSLAND 112.5 0 . 1.%

V. MBUGAiI. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 881_.5 l'.-5,--. Mbuga with Scattered

bLushes (Mb)1:. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 8769.75TOTAL MBUGA CM) 175al.25

VI. CULTIVATION CC+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 7962.5 4 . .915. Cultivation with tree

crops tCt) -16. Cultivation and bush

remnants (CS) 481.=5 ). O%17. Cultivation and Tree

remnants (CT) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C.) 4447.75 44.44%

vIi. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -'9. Sare Ground (Sag) 575 C. 74-'O!Q. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr)21. Open Water (OW) Z-18.75 0'.41%

TOTAL OTHERS 899.75 1.15%GRAND TOTAL AREA 77506.25 1i:(Q. 017.

ANNEX 3Page 9 of 35

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT APUSHA MAPSHEET NUMBER 104/1MAPSHEET NAME f<IK.ILO

…-------_____-------------_____-------------------------------__------


…----------------------------------_------------------------------__-.I. FOREST: (F)


TOTAL FOREST (F) -

II. WOODLAND (W)Dense Woodland (Wd) 8675 :1.5-/%

4. Open Woodland (Wo) 724_7. 75TOTAL WOODLAND (W) l5918.75 21.15%.

TII. BUSHLAND (t)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (Dd) 11:6.25 0.14%7. Open BLushland (So) 993. 75 1.32%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (8) 1100.00: 1.46%

IV. GLASSLAND (G.)8. Open Glassland (6) - -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 737.5 0.98%,

10. tBushed Glassland (Bg) _50 1.47%TOTAL GRASSLAND (Ge) 1087.5 1.45-/.

V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 856.25 1.'14%.1. Mbuga with Scattered


cultivation (Mc) 6831. 25 P.:'8.TOTAL MBUGA (M) 7687.5 10.=%2.

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 42168.75 56. (.3,%15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (CB) 6S18.75 9.:6%17. Cultivation and Tree

remnants (CT) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (Ce) 48_87. 5 S4.29%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag) 10681.25 a4%t0. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) --1. Open Water (WO) -

TOTAL OTHERS 1081.25 1.44%GRAND TOTAL AREA 75262. 5 1 00. 10

ANNEX 3Page lO of 35

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA MAPSHEET NUMBER 98/7MAPSHEET NAME NGASUMET

-- -- -- ----- - - --- - ----_-----_--_ _ __ _-------------- --------_ _---__ _ _ __ _ _ _

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % of :iapsheet area


Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F) -

II. WOODLAND (W)*. Dense Woodland (Wd) 47.5 I .''.4. Open Woodland (WoC 2=7-I.5 . '

TOTAL WOODLAND (WI 26162. 5 55. S'

III. BUSHLAND (9)S. Thicket (T)6. Dense Bushland (Ed) 275 4.84%7. Open Bushland (Be) 25 0.05,'

TOTAL BUSHLAND (3) 2: 00 4. 39%

rV. GLASSLAND (G+)S. Open Grassland (G)9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 67144.75 9.49%

10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 24.75 0.52%TOTAL GRASSLAND (G) 17387.50 -7%


bushes (Mb)17. Mbuga with Scattered

cultivation (Mc)TOTAL MBUGA (M) 806 ..225 * 72'.

VI. CULTIVATION (C.)14. Open Cultivation (C)15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb)17. Cultivation and tree

remnants (CT)TOTAL CULTIVATrON (C+)

VIZ. OTHERS:1. Urban Settlement (U)19. Bare Ground (Bag) 7.77. 5 0. 7%20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) - -21. Open Water (OW) -

TOTAL OTHERS -. 7- 5 ''. 72%GRAND TOTAL AREA 46993.75 1 001%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA MAPSHEET NUMBER 6e/1MAPSHEET NAME LANDENAI

----- __________---------------_-__--_--__---_-----_----__________________

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) %, of Mapsheet area

------------------------------------------------------------------ __--

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 1187.75 1.39%

Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F) 1187. 5 1.89%

II. WOODLAND (W)7. Dense Woodland (Wd) 5047. 75 S.44. open Woodland (Wo) -95-1 5 47. 071

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 34575 '5-1-/

rII. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thick.et (T)6. Dense Bushland (9d) 76:. 5 0.5S%.7. Open Bushland (Bo) .. 8' .5 6.11

TOTAL BUSHLAND (8) 419Z. 7! 6.t91.

IV. GLASSLAND (G+)3. Open Grassland (G) -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 081 * 15 12. ,'

10. Bushed Grassland (Eg) 8 1.25 1. 72%

V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 4Z.75 0.7%.1:. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) 712. 5 1.41%13. Mbuaa with Scattered

cultivation (Mc) - _TOTAL MPUGA (M) 756.`5 i.-'I.

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 93 .75 0 '.47%15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (CB)17. Cultzvtion and tree

remnants (CT) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C-) 229:.75 0:.47%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag) 68.75 ('.11%20. Grass andEBare Rock; (Gbr) - -

:1. Open Water (OW) -TOTAL OTHER 68.75 tj.ll'GRAND TOTAL "EA 627737. 5 99!.9


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA MAPSHEET NUMBER 87/4MAPSHEET NAME NAMULULU

------------- _-__________LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % of Map

sheet area…---------------------------------------------------------------------

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 44-3. 75 ,.5,7

Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F) 443. 75 0.57:

II. WOODLAND (W)Dense Woodland (Wd) 14468.75 is.S_'

4. Open Woodland (Wo) -.S.456. 5 4-,. -z,TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 479'25 6:.,'

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T)6. Dense Bushland (8d) 3f062. 5 . 4 %7. Open Bushland (Bo) 983.7. 5 1 .66%

TOTAL eUSHLAND (B) 129:0 16.S6D,

IV. GLASSLAND (G*)S. Open Grassland (G) -9. Wooded Glassland (Wq) 6281.-5 6.8%10. Bushed Grassland (8g) 6450 8.3%


V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 75 4. * 4%12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) 13 1.71,'1. Mbuga with Scattered

cultivation (Mc) -TOTAL MSUGA (M) 4700 6. t 11.



remnants (CS) - -17. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (CT) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C4)

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Sag) - -.0. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) - -

Z1. Open Water tOW) - -TOTAL OTHER - -GRAND TOTAL AREA 7770C 100%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA MAPSHEET NUMBER 87/ZMAPSHEET NAME LAIBERA

…-----------------------------------------------------------______---.LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) *: ofF Map -

sheet area

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 156.:-'0 2:`2. Forest Plantation (Fp) -

TOTAL FOREST (F) l56.:5 7:':%

II. WOODLAND (W)7 . Dense Woodland (Wd) 1843.75

4. Open Woodland (Wo) 7587. STOTAL WOODLAND (W) 5431. 5 S.0i5'

III. BUSHLAND (C)5. Thicket (T) -6. Dense Bushland (8d) 20025 :Q.79%7. Open Bushland (Eo) l0106.25 15..

TOTAL BUSHLAND (8) 30131.25 44.82%.

IV. GLASSLAND (G+)S. Open Grassland (G) 13931.25 20 .72%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 281.25 C . 42%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 12743r. 75 18.86%

TOTAL GRASSLAND 26956.25 4(0. I(.'P.

V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) oO006.25 4.47,12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) 450 0. 67%.13. Mbuga with Scattered

cultivation (Mc) - -TOTAL MBUeA (M) .456.25 5.14-,'.

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 925 1.-9-/.

15. Cultivation with treecrops (Ct) -

16. Cultivation and bushremnants (CS)

17. Cultivtion and treeremnants (CT) - -

TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 925 1.-8%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -

19. Bare Ground (Bag) 175 0u '%20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) - _21. Open Water (OW) - -

TOTAL OTHER 175 0:26-GRAND TOTAL AREA 67231.25 100.01%

ANNEX 3Page 14 of .35

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA MAPSHEET NUMBER 87/2MAPSHEET NAME NAPERE7A


------------------------------------------------------------------ __--

r. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 4752. Forest Plantation (Fp) -

TOTAL FOREST (F) 475

II. WOODLAND (W)Dense Woodland (Wd) I0 Ct93.75 1.41'

4. Open Woodland (Wo) 27068.75 34.84%TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 28162. 5 6.^5%

2II. BUSHLAND (8)5. Thick'et (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 5756.25 7.41%7. Open Bushland (Do) 856.25 1. 1%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) 6612. 5 a.51%

IV. GLASSLAND (Ge)8. Open Grassland (G) 549:. 75 7.C.7.9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 24575lc). Bushed Grassland (Bg) 6425 8.27%

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G) 36493.75 46.97%

V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 475 0.61%12. Mbuga with Scattereo

bushes (Mb) 2=97.751o. Mbuga with Scattered

cultivation (Mc) -TOTAL MBUGA (M) :868.25

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) :087. 5 3.97%15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (CB)17. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (C:T) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 7087. 5 7.9'%

VIr. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag) - -:o. Grass and Sare Rock (Gbr) - -21. Open Water (OW) - -

TOTAL OTHERSGRAND TOTAL AREA 777040 100


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA MAPSHEET NUMBER 871"MAPSHEET NAME OLMOTONGOS

…-------------------------------…-______------___________________


…___________I. FOREST: (F)

:. Natural Forest 'fn)Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W)Dense Woodland (Wd) 512. 3 1.4(:i4%

4. Open Woodland (Wo) 7206.25 14.5Q%TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 7718.75S

IrI. BUSHLAND CB)5. Thicket (T) -6. Dense Bushland (9d)7. Open Bushland (Bo) 418.75 0:.95%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (8) 418.75 .257.

IV. GLASSLAND (G6)S. Open Grassland (G) 26225 5. 1 19. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 7731.25

10. Bushed Grassland (8g) -TOTAL GRASSLAND 3956. 25 68.77%,

V. MBUGA (M)11. mbuga with grass (Mg) 750) 7.. 51^. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) 74-1.25 6 .?9'%,1. Mbuga with Scattered

cultivation (Mc) -TOTAL MBUGA (M) 7181.=5

VI. CULTIVATION (C*)14. Open Cultivation (C) 1 C.6.25 0. %15. Cultivation with tree



remnants (CT)TOTAL CULTIVATION (C.) 106.5 3.2_5

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag) -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) -21. Open Water (OW) -

TOTAL OTHER GRAND TOTAL AREA 49ZS1.25 1 0' *I01%

AtNEX 3Page 16 of 35

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA MAPSHEET NUMSER 86/1MAPSHEET NAME MBUGA YA LAMAK.AI

…__________________________ -…-_____________________________.____LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % of Map

sheet area…------------------------------------------------------------._---__---

1. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn)

Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FORSST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W):3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 5`.9Z.7 54. Open Woodland (Wo) 9575

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 14968.75 29.:2,'.

III. BUSHLAND (t)5. Thicket (T) -,

6. Dense Bushland (8d) 9587. 5 1s.72%7. Open Bushland (So) 812. 5 !.59,'.

TOTAL BUSHLAND (0) 10400 2t0.31%

IV. GLASSLAND (CG*)S. Open Grassland (G) I UO 25.97%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg)10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 3356.25 S.55,'

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G6) 16656.25 7 55.

V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 9193.75 17.q5%1. Mbuga with Scattered

busnes (Mb) -l3. Mbuga with Scattered

cultivation (Me) _ _TOTAL MBUGA (M) 9193.75 l7.45.'



remnants (CB) -17. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (CT) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+)

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag) - -

20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) - -21. Open Water (OW) - -

TOTAL OTHERS - -GRAND TOTAL AREA 5118.75 l):t)',


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA MAPSHEET NUMBER 85/4MAPSHEET NAME GALAFPO

_________________________------_____________________________________.-


---------------------------- _----------------------------------__-___.

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 1450 1.87%2. Forest Plantation (Fp)

rOTAL FOREST (F) 145C .

II. WOODLAND (W)*=. Dense Woodland (Wd) 14212. 5 18.29'4. Open Woodland (Wo) :7. 5 0. 05%

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 14250 19.-4%

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) -6. Dense Bushland (Sd) 6618.75 6.'.7. Open Bushland (So) 1156.25 1.49%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (5) 7775 10.01%

IV. GLASSLAND (G+)S. Open Grassland (G) -9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) -10. Bushed Grassland (kg) -

TOTAL GRASSLAND -

V. MBUGA CM)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 6906.25 .9%12. Mbuga with Scattered


cultivation (Mc) 73Z06.25 9.4%'TOTAL MBUGA (M) 142i2. 5 18.29%,'


crops (Ct) - -16. CLltivation and bush

remnants (CS) 273.00 Z.96%17. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (CT) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 38325 49. :,'.

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U)19. Bare Ground (Bag) 1687. 5 2.17,'20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) -21. Open Water (OW) -

TOTAL OTHER 1687. 5 2.17%GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700 1 (:30%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA MAPSHEET NUMEBER 85/-MAPSHEET NAME NORTH EBULU SEREKU


----------- _.-----------------------------------------------------__---


TOTAL FOREST (F) -

II. WOODLAND (W)Dense Woodland (Wd) lC:475.cz 17.'.

4. Open Woodland (Wo) 6268.5 1l.-5'.TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 167.7.5 27.

IrI. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) -8. Dense BEushland (Bd) 206.25 4%7. Open Bushland (Eo) 112.50 C:).18,

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) IS8.75 0).5

IV. GLASSLAND (G.)S. Open Grassland (G)9. Wooded Glassland (Wg)10. Bushed Grassland (9g)

V. MBUGA Ct)II. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 1781.25I_. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) -i-. Mbuga with Scattered

cultivation (Mc) 4287.5TOTAL MBUGA (M) 6068.75 9.q7%

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) -2762.5 5-. 6 Q,".15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (CB) 421.75 6.90,'17. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (CT) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C.) 76981.-:5 6tj. 50/

VII. OTHERS:16. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag) E7%_0. Grass and Bare Rock:: (Gbr)zl. Open Water (OW) 787. 50 l. 9-!.

TOTAL OTHER 101:.s'0 1.6S-,GRAND TOTAL AREA 61118.75 1 :0. 0(".


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA MARSHEET NUMBER 85/2MARSHEET NAME SANGAIWE HILLS

…------------------------------------------------------------__-------LAND COVEP TYPE AREA (ha) % of Map

sheet area------------------------------------------------------------------ __--

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) :.z.C): 4.12%

Forest Plantation (Fp) - -TOTAL FOREST (F) 7200. QQ la . 1%.1

II. WOODLAND (W).z. Dense Woodland (Wd)4. Open Woodland (Wo) -1 7c)6. 5 '7.Q4 .


III. BUSHLAND (S)5. Thicket (T)6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 1oei2.5o I.. 92 "I7. Open Bushland (So) 2825.00 .


IV. SLASSLAND (G+)8. Open Grassland (G) 275.0C0 C) S/.9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 1068.7510. Bushed Grassland (9g) 2156.25 2.78%

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G6) Z500.00 4.51%

V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 2800.CX.612. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb)1:7. Mbuga with Scattered

cultivation (Mc)TOTAL MBUGA (M) 2B800.00 7.60%

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 1 7.50 27.46-Z.15. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct3 50. *00 c'.16. Cultivation and bush

remnants (CB) 8287.50 16.67%17. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (CT) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 29675.0:0 8.19%

VII. OTHERS:12. Urban Settlement (U)19. Bare Ground (Bag) 1812.50 2. z%20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) 1768.75 1.76%21. Open Water (OW) - -

TOTAL OTHERS 31g1.25 4.09%GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 10:':. 00%.

A¢NEX 3Page 20 of 35

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA MAPSHEET NUMBER 95/1MAPSHEET NAME BABATI KIRU VALLEY

---------------------- - _-- _--- __--- ----------------------------- _* ----

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) /. of mapsheet area


TOTAL FOREST FF) 26.5 0. 4%

II. WOODLAND (W)Dense Woodland (Wd) 297.5 0.6'

4. Open Woodland (Wo) 86.5 .6TOTAL WOODLAND (W) -1 5'..

1II. BUSHLAND (B)S. Thick:et (T)6. Dense Bushland (d) 911.5 -1.47-,'7. Open Bushland (So) :3987.5 7.817.

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) 12700 29. ::%

IV. GLASSLAND (G6)S. Open ,Grassland (G) 2 7.5 Q. 515%.9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) - -10. Bushed Grassland (Eg) 812.5 1.87%

TOTAL GRASSLAND 1050 2.4-2

V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 14-.75 0. ;Z%12. Mbuga with Scattereo


cultivation .(Mc) 112.5 0 .TOTAL MDUGA (M) Z56. 25 59%

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 22547.75 51.98,'15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (CB) 25':8.25 5.79%17. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (CT) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) :5068. 75 57. 8

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag) 747.75 0.79,24o50. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) - -I1. Open Water (OW) 600 I. .--a.

TOTAL OTHERS 943. 75 2.17%

GRAND TOTAL AREA 4t375. *00 It:C)0.

ANN7EX 3PagVV 21of 35

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA MAPSHEET NUMBER 72/3MAPSHEET NAME LOLDENE

…_________..__________________________________________________________LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) IV. of Map

sheet area--------- ____________________________________________________________

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 218.75 C'. 0C'%

Forest Plantation (Fp) - _TOTAL FOREST (F) 218.75 ".'

II. WOODLAND tW)7w. Dense Woodland (Wd) 2S17.C5 -. t9%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 18268.75 24.97%

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 20068. 25 21.12%

1II. BUSHLAND (2)S. Thicket (T) _ _6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 4487.50 6.12%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 12175.00 16.61%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (8) 16662.50 22.7-%

IV. 6LASSLAND (G*)8. Open Grassland (6) 625.00 0.85%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 21787.50 -9.7S/.10. Bushed Grassland (8g) 8850.00 1U.C'8%

TOTAL GRASSLAND 12"62.50 4'2.65%

V. MBUGA (M)II. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 1000.001-. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) 137.50 0:.19%,13. Mbuga with Scattered

cultivation (Mc) - -TOTAL MBUGA (M) 1 17. 50 I

vr. CULTIVATION (Ce)14. Open Cultivation (C) -15. Cultivation with tree



remnants (CT)TOTAL CULTIVATION (Ce)

VIZ. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U)19. Bare Ground (Sag) :143.75 4.29%20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) - -21. Open Water OW) 250. 00 0. 74%

TOTAL OTHERS 3Z93.75 4.67%GRAND TOTAL AREA 7=81 . 25 99.99%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA MAPSHEET NUMBER 71/4MAPSHEET NAME OLDOINYO LALASHO

…________________________________________________________________--__LAND COVER TYFE AREA (ha) % of Map

sheet area---------- _____-----------------------------_---------------------__-_


TOTAL FOREST (F) -

II. WOODLAND (W)Dense Woodland (Wd) 2862.50 3.77%

4. Open Woodland (Wo) 4131.25 5.45,'TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 699?..75

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) -

6. Dense Etushland (8d) 1l06.25 1.59%7. Open E'ushland (Bo) 0300.:00 39.96%

TOTAL SUSHLAND (B) 31506.25 41.55%.

IV. GLASSLAND (Gr.)S. Open Grassland (G) 7525.00 9.97'9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 20125.c:0 26.54%'.10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 8106.25 10.69%

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G.) 5756.25 47.16%

V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 1.7.50 Cl. 18%12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb)13. Mbuga with Scattered

cultivation (Mc)TOTAL MBUGA (M) 1.7.5C...



remnants (CS)17. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (CT) -

TOTAL CULTIVATION (C*)

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U)19. Bare Ground (Bag) 1431.25 1.99%2O. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr)21. Open Water (OW) -

TOTAL OTHERS 1431.25 1.89%GRAND TOTAL AREA 758:5 100%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA MAFSHEET NUMBER 71/-MAPSHEET NAME TERAT

…_________________________________-…- ___________________.

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) 7 % of Mapsheet area

…--------------------------------------------------------------------.


TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W)Dense Woodland (Wd) 24Z.75 Ci. 57%.

4. Open Woodland (Wo) 581.=5 8.44%TOTAL WOODLAND (W) ,81s5 9.(:)1/.

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) -

6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 700 1.65%Z7. Open Bushland (Bo) 8912.5 21.017.

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) 9612.5 2-.6 6%

IV. GLASSLAND (6.)S. Open Grassland (G) 5462.5 12.8e%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 99..75 2.-4%

10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 9481.25 2.75%TOTAL GRASSLAND 15937. 5 77.57%

V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 50 0.12.12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) 440o 1 o). 7/.1'. Mbuga with Scattered

cultivation (Mc) IS6.25 0 . 7%7TOTAL MBUGA (M) 4606.25 10.86%

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 20Iz50 4. 3S*%15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (CB) 639'.75 1 .57%17. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (CT)TOTAL CULTIVATION (C.) 844Z.75 19.9%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag) -o:0. Grass and. Bare Rock (Gbr) -

21. Open Water (OW) -TOTAL OTHERS GRAND TOTAL AREA 42425 100%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA MAPSHEET NUMBER 71/1MAPSHEET NAME OLJORO

------ ------ ------ -- ---- ------ ------ -- ---- ------ ------ -- __-


------- _________---------------------------------------------------__-

I. FOREST: (F)'1. Natural Forest (Fn) 7. 5 .4

Forest F lantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F) -. 7. 5 ,.4-.-

II. WOODLAND (W)Dense Woodland (Wd) 520C.) 6.69%,

4. Open Woodland (Wo) 10C0 1.29%TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 62f00 7.'qS.

111. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) -6. Dense Bushland (8d)7. Open Bushland (Bo) 93.75 C_%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (5) 93.75 (0.1_2%

IV. GLASSLAND (G+)8. Open Grassland (6) 5687. 5 7.32%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) -10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 3066S.75 79. 47%

TOTAL GRASSLAND 3,$756.25 46. 79-:

V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 7_7. q12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) 218.75 4. 14%13. Mbuga with Scattered

cultivation (Mc) 84-3.75 1. 09%TOTAL MBUGA (M) 480o.00) 6. 18%

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 26512. 5 -4.1-/15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (CB) 331.25 4. 17. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (CT) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C.) 29893.75 78.47%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -l9. -Bare Ground (Bag)_20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) -21. Open Water (OW) 18.75 C'

GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700 99.99S'

ANNEX 3

Page 25 of 35

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA MAPSHEET NUM5ER 70/-.MAPSHEET NAME TARANGIRE

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) "%6 of Mapsheet area

------------------------------------------------------------------ __


TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W)Z. Dense Woodland (Wd)4. Open Woodland (Wo) 266-. s

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 22662. 5

rir. SUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T)6. Dense Bushland (9d) 21475 17 I 7. Open Bushland (Bo) 1787. 5 2.61%.

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) 6-Z26. 5 5-.91 %

IV. GLASSLAND (6G)8. Open Grassland (G) . 11225 16.76%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) - -

10. Bushed Grassland (9g) 6681.25 .74%TOTAL GRASSLAND (G6) 17906.25 :6.1%

V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 4775 6.96S',4 .6 Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) - -1I. Mbuga with Scattered

cultivation (Mc) _ _TOTAL MBUGA (M) 4775 6.96%.

VI. CULTrVATION (C.)14. Open Cultivation (C) -15. Cultivation with tree

crozs (Ct) -16. Cultivation and bush

remnants (CB) 17. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (CT) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+)

VIr. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) - -19. Bare Ground (Bag) - -_X:0. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) - -21. Open Water (OW) - -

TOTAL OTHER - -GRAND TOTAL AREA 68606.25 1 '0 %


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA MAPSHEET NUMBER 7C/2MAPSHEET NAME MESERANI

--------------------------------------------------------------- __-----

LAND COVER TYPE AREA 'ha) % ef Mapsheet area

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn)Z. Forest Plantation (Fp) - -


II. WOODLAND (W)7. Dense Woodland (Wd) - -4. Open Woodland (Wo) - -

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) - -

1II. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) - _6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 7493.75 9.64"7. Open Bushland (Bo) - -

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) 749 9.64-'.

IV. GLASSLAND (G+)8. Open Grassland (G) 10081.25 12.98%9'. Wooded Glassland (Wg) -

10. Bushed Grassland (Eg) 4:756.25TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) 53837.50 69.2SC)

V. MBUGA (H)I1. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 5656.25 7. 8'%1. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) 943. 1.-51,3. Mbuga with Scattered

cultivation (Mc) 1725TOTAL MBUGA (M) 87'r25. 00 10.72%

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 7631.25 1 0.'e%1S. Cultivation with tree


remnants (CB) -12. 50 Z7. 17. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (CT) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (Ce) 8a4Z.75 10.35%

VII. OTHERS:18. Uroan Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag) -:0. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) -21. Open Water COW) -

TOTAL OTHER -GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 100%

AENNX 3Page 27 of 35

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA MAPSHEET NUMBER 70/1MAPSHEET NAME MAKUYUNI




II. WOODLAND (W):3. Dense Woodland (Wd)4. Open Woodland (Wo)

TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B)S. Thicket (T)6. Dense Bushland (8d) 11475 14.77%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 9500 12.27%


IV. GLASSLAND (64)S. Open Grassland (G) 13600 17.5%9. Wooded Glassrand (Wg) 68.75 0.X:a09%

10. Bushed Grassland (Eg) 7125 9.17%TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) 20793.75 26.76%

V. MBUGA (M)I1. Mbuga with grass (Mg) :856.<5 -.6B,'12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) -1,. Mbuga with Scattered

cultivation (Mc) 6862.5C S. .7,TOTAL MBUGA (M) 9718.75 12.51%,

VI. CULTIVATION CC+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 2621:. SC' .. ?4%1S. Cultivation with tree


remnants (CS)17. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (CT)TOTAL CULTIVATION (C.) 262"12.50

VIT. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U)19. Bare Ground (Bag)20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr)21. Open Water (OW)

TOTAL OTHER -GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700 1 0(. 1:10%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA MAPSHEET NUMEBER 69/4MAPSHEET NAME MAGUGU

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) " o0 Mapsheet area

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 456.2_ t.59'

Forest Plantation (Fp) -TOTAL FOREST (F) 456.25 0.59"

II. WOODLAND (W)Dense Woodland (Wd) 8C06.'5 11.04%

'. Open Woodland (Wo) 15-62.)0 1q.64%TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 16068.75 _C.68%

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T)6. Dense Bushland (Pd) 1769Z.75 17.6-,7. Open Bushland (BO) 2071.25

TOTAL BUSHLAND (3) 15725 Z._.%

rv. GLASSLAND (G+)8. Open Grassland (G) 7806.25 4.9%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 3612.50 4.65%10. Bushed Grassland (Pg) 52C1:0 6.69%,


V. MBUGA (M)II. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 1300 1.67%12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) =1 : 06. 5 _.;'1;. iMbuga with Scattered

cultivation (Mc) 68.5 0t, 08TOTAL MBUGA (M) Z468.75 4.46%

VI. CULTIVATION (C.)14. Open Cultivation CC) 8125 10.56%15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (CB) 7987.50 l0:.'V.17. Cultxvtion and trees

remnants (CT)TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 16112.50 0.84%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U)19. Bare Ground (Bag) 8387.5'0 10.79%0O. Grass and Bare Rock (tGbr)

21. Open Water (OW) 4862.50 6.26%TOTAL OTHER 13250 17.0:15%GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700 100.09%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA MAPSHEET NUMBER 54/3MAPSHEET NAME LOSIMINGURI

----------------------------------------------------------------- __---


------------------------------------------------------------------ __--

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 5100 6560%

Forest Plantation (Fp) - -TOTAL FOREST (F) 5100 6.'6/.

II. WOODLAND (W)3. Dense Woodland (Wd) 1793.75 2.71%4. Open Woodland (Wo) 5706.25 S.87X


1I1. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) -6. Dense Bushland (Bd) 868.75 1.12-.7. Open Bushland (Bo) 4700 6.05%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) 5568.75 7.l7%

IV. SLASSLAND (G.)8. Open Grassland (G) 2w831.25 26.81%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) - -10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 23300 29.99%

TOTAL GRASSLAND 44131.25 56. 8%

V. MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) .306.25 0:. 79%12. Mbuga with Scattered


cultivation (Mc) 193.75 0 *TOTAL MBUGA (M) 500 0:.64%.

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 1Z156.25 16.9'.-f15. Cultivation with tree


remnants (CS) 2143.75 2.76%17. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (CT)TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 15300 1 q* 69%

VII. OTHERS:is. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag) -20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) -21. Open Water (OW) -

TOTAL OTHER GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700t 100


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA MAPSHEET NUMBER 54/4MAFSHEET NAME MONDULI

------- ________-------------------_---_________________________-______

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % of Macsheet area

_______________________________________________________________._______

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 4,81.25 5.64%2. Forest Plantation (Fp) -

TOTAL FOREST (F) 4781.=5 . S4%

II. WOODLAND (W)5 - Dense Woodland (Wd) 12806.54. Open Woodland (Wo) 9400

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) I 20f.6 . 25 15.71-,'

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (Bd) - -7. Open Bushland (So) 162.50f .1I,.

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) 162.50

IV. GLASSLAND (G+)8. Open Grassland (G) 8925 11.490%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 775 1.00%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 8B831.25 7.11,'

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G.) 38531.25

V. MBUGA (M)II. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 2875 _|.7,.

12. Mbuga with Scatteredbushes (Mb) -

13. Mbuga with Scatteredcultivation (Mc) .d93.75 0.57%TOTAL MBUGA (M) -268.75 4.21,:

VI. CULTIVATION (C.)14. Open Cultivation (C) 177086.25 Z2.79%15. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) 2586.25 0. %16. Cultivation and bush

remnants (CS) 1162.50 1.%17. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (CT) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C.) 19125 24.62,.

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag)20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) -21. Open Water (OW) 25 0.03%

TOTAL OTHER 25 C. 0%,'GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700 100. o:%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA MAPSHEET NUMBER Wsi/4MAPSHEET NAME MTO WA MBU

--------------------------------------- _------------------------------


I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 777.50

Forest Plantation (Fp) -TOTAL FOREST (F) 7:37.50

II. WOODLAND (W).1T. Dense Woodland (Wd) 12.50 .'76/4. Open Woodland (Wo) 287.50 0.49%

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) Soo 0.85%

rrI. BUSHLAND (3)5. Thicket (T) - -6. Dense Bushland (Sd) 7412.50 12.S%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 14212.50 24.01%

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) 21625 6.53X.

IV. GLASSLAND (G*)8. Open Grassland (G) 2593.75 4.32%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) -10. Bushed Grassland (8g) 16193.75 7 -'6'

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) 18787.50 '1.74%


bushes (Mb) --

1Z. Mbuga with Scatteredcultivation (Mc) _ _TOTAL MBUGA (M) 11718.75 19.8%

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 977.5E0 1.58%1s. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) 329Z.75 5.56%16. Cultivation and bush

remnants (CS) 17. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (CT) _TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) 4Z31.25 7.14%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U)19. Bare Ground (Bag)8C. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr)21. Open Water (OW) 1587.50 2.68%

TOTAL OTHER 15e7.50 2.68%GRAND TOTAL AREA 59187.50 99. 99%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA MAPSHEET NUMBER 55/3-MAPSHEET NAME ARUSHA

…---------------------------- - _____________________________________LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % of Map

sheet area…----------------------------------------------------------._-----__---

T. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 5456.`572. Forest Plantation (Fp) 1c:S 8.!-,'.

TOTAL FOREST (F) 7081.25 9. :7.

II. WOODLAND (W)Dense Woodland (Wd)

4. Open Woodland (Wo)TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

IlI. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T)6. Dense Bushland (9d)7. Ooen Bushland (So)

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GLASSLAND (G+)8. Open Grassland (G) 1518.75 1.99%9. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 43.75 0.06%10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) -368.75


V. - MBUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 1 .5 Ci. 4".%12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) -1:. Mbuga wi.th Scattered

cultivation (Mc) 1868.75 2.45%TOTAL MBUGA CM) =X20 2.88

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) 50 181.25 69%15. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) 11887.50 iS.56%16. Cul"tivation and bush

remnants (CB) 17. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (CT) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (Ce) 62068.75 81.25,%

VII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) 111_.50 !.46%19. Bare Ground (Bag) - -2 .2 Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) - -2I. Open Water (OW) - _

TOTAL OTHER - -GRAND TOTAL AREA 7639Z. *75 100.00%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA MAPSHEET NUMBER 69/2MAPSHEET NAME I:WAKUCHINJA


------------------------------------------------------------------ __-


TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W)Dense Woodland (Wd)

4. Open Woodland (Wo) 56.25 C.c:7%TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 56.25 C:. 7',

III. BUSHLAND tB)5. Thicket CT) - _6. Dense Bushland (td) 4468.73 5.7S5%7. Open Bushland (Bo) 7306.25


IV. GLASSLAND (6.)S. Open Grassland (G) 6793.75 8.74%9. Wooded Glassland CWg) - -

10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 9050.00 11.65%TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) 15843.75 2Q.39%

V. MEUGA (M)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 6106.25 7.896%.i2. Mbuga with Scattered


cultivation (Mc) 4287.50 S.TOTAL MBUGA (M) 1O39-.75 1Z.8.

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) -,468.75 4.47%'.15. Cultivation wi'h tree


remnants (CS) 725.00 0. '17. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (CT) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C-) 4193.75 5.4(%,'

vII. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) -19. Bare Ground (Bag)20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) -21. Open Water (OW) 35437.5 45.61%

TOTAL OTHER 35437.5 45.61%GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 1it:'. 00 '.


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA MARSHEET NUMBER 71/1MAPSHEET NAME OLJORO

-- --____ _-- - --______-_-_- -- -- --_- --------------_- _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _


----------- _-----------__________---------------------------------__--

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) :37.5 Q. 4-.2. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F) 77.5 0.47.'

II. WOODLAND (W)::. . Dense Woodland (Wd) 52'0. '0S4. Open Woodland (Wo) 1 oc0.:} 00 1.-9%

TOTAL WOODLAND (W) 6200:). C0: 7. PS%

III. BUSHLAND (B)5. Thicket (T) _ _6. Dense Bushland (Sd)7. Open Bushland (So) 9. 7 5 12/.

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B) 9Z.75 I. _7I%

IV. GLASSLAND (G+)S. Open Grassland (G) 5687.5 7 .*:29. Wooded Glassland (Wg) - -10. Bushed Grassland (9g) 0C(668.75 Q9.47%.


V. MBUGA (11)11. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 7 7.5 C0.95 %12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) 7218.75 4.1411.1. Mbuga with Scattered

cultivation (Mc) 847.75TOTAL MBUGA (M) 4800. 0 6. I1s,8,

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)14. Open Cultivation (C) ^6512.5 -4.1=%1L. Cultivation with tree


remnants (CB) 281. 4 5%17. Cultlvtion and tree

remnants (CT) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) -989-.75 Z8.47%

VII. OTHERS:IS. Urban Settlement (U)19. Bare Ground (Bag):O. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) -1. Open Water (OW) 18.7' 7.02%

TOTAL OTHER GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 99.99,'

SUMMARY SHEET ANE 3Page 35 of 35

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT ARUSHA

…__________________------…-- ---------- __________

LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % ofSegment

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) -_.81S.75 i. ^-%

Forest Plantation (Fp) 1625.c)0 (:.0:8%SUB-TOTAL 25443. 75

II. WOODLAND (W)Dense Woodland (Wd) 96625.0t: 4. 99%

4. Open Woodland (Wo) 260418.75SUB-TOTAL '75704-.75 1G.41-

III. BUSHLAND (B)5.. Thicket (T)6. Dense Bushland (Cd) I8?781.25 9.48%7. Open Bushland (So) 184225.00 9. 45',

SUB-TOTAL .67006.25 18. 97%

IV. GLASSLAND (G.)S. Open Grassland (G) 1581U7.5 8.15%9. Wooded Gl6ssland (Wg) 134662.5 6.89X10. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 59225.00 ;.7,'

SUB-TOTAL 551025.00 9.41%

V. MBUGA (Ml)I1. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 96200.00 4.96%,12. Mbuga with Scattered

bushes (Mb) -2106.5 1.414,'1. Mbuga with Scattered

cultivation (Mc) 4`700. 00 . .25%SUB-TOTAL 162006. 5 8. ..51,.

VI. CULTIVATION (C.)14. Open Cultivation (C) 4939, . 75 .8. C.):15. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) 15506.2_5 (.8%16. Cultivation and bush

remnants (CB) 46018.7517. Cultivtion and tree

remnants (CT)SUB-TOTAL 410918.7' 21.19%

VIZ. OTHERS:18. Urban Settlement (U) 1112.5 0.06/19. Bare Ground (Bag) 19418.75 1. (%20. Grass and Bare Rock (Gbr) 1-68.75 0.017%21. Open Water (OW) 47887.5 -.-6/

SUB-TOTAL 65787.5GRAND TOTAL AREA 19Z9231.25 99.99,%

ANNEX 4Page 1 of 73

IV. DAR-ES-SALAAM SEGMENT AREA STATISTICS

4.1 This volume presents data on the absolute, and relative areacoverages of the various land cover types found in the Tabora/Mwanzasegment. The data is presented in tabular form-each page sheetcontaining data for a named mapsheet area.

4.2 The format of the tables is the same for all of the mapsheetareas covered in the Dar-es-Salaam survey. On the first and secondcolumns of the tables appear names of the major land cover categories andt1feir constituent "types", respectively. The third and fourth columnscontain data indicating the absolute area coverage (in hectares) and therelative area coverage (as percentage of the map sheet area),respectively, of each of the named land cover categories and constituentland cover types.

4.3 Brief definitions of the various terms used in the tables todescribe the land cover categories and "type" are given below. Thedefinitions are adopted from the cLassification by Pratt et al, (1966).

AM= 4Page 2 of 73




2. Mangrove Forests (Fn)Cm)


II WOOOLAND (W): 4. Dense Woodland (Wd)


III BUSH.AND (B) 6. Thicket CT)

3 7. Dense Bushland (Bd)

S. Open Busheland (to)

IV GRASSLAND (G): 9. Open Grassland (6)


11. Bushed Grassland (Sg)

V 4UGA (M): 12. Mbuga wi" grass (Mg)

13. Mbuga wilt scattered bush (Mb)

14. Mbuge wi th scatteredcultivation (W.)

VI CULTIVATION (C) IS. Open cultivation ce)

16. Cultivation witt tree

crmps MCt)


18. Cultivation and tree

renants (CT)

Vol OTHERS - 19. Urban settle mnt tU)

20. Bareground (Oag)

21. Salt Sareground (Sags)(s)


23. Opn water {".)

ANNU 4Page 3 of 73


(a)FOREST (F): Tree cover with closed canopy of one or more strata. Threetypes of forest were distinguished:


(ii) Mangrove Forests (Fn(m): An asscciation of physiologicallyspecialized plants inhabiting muddy swamps, creeks, deltasand sheltered shores along tropical sea coasts, periodicallyinundated by tides. Mangrove forests may be closed or openand they can be either pure or consist of a mixture of twoor more species. Mangroves along the Cast African Coast maycontour up to nine species belonging to six families.

(iii) Forest Plantations. (Fp): Includes all categories ofartificial forests.

(b) WOODLAND (W): An assemblage of trees with a canopy cover of morethan 20%. The canopy may be continuous, but not thicklyinterlaced. Crass and herbs-dominate the ground cover. Two typesof woodlands were distinguishable on the imagery:

(i) Dense woodland (Nd): Refers to woodland with canopy cover ofmore than 50%. Ideally a medium dense woodland category shouldhave been included in the legend, but identification of thecategory on the imagery was found to be inconclusive. Thecategory was therefore merged with dense woodland.

(ii) Open woodland (No): Refers to woodland with canopy cover ofless than SOZ.

(c) BUSHL^lD (B): A assemblage of shrubs, (below 4. height) mostlymultigte.ed, with a canopy cover of more than 20S. Three types ofbushlands are distinguishable on the imagery.


(ii) Dense bushland (Bd): Refers to bushland with canopy cover ofabove 50Z. Similar to the woodland a medium dense bushlandcategory should have been included in the legend, butidentification of the category on the imagery was found to beinconclusive. The category was therefore merged with densebushland.

ANNEX 4Page 4 of 73

(iii) Open bushland (Bo): Refers to bushland with canopy cover ofless than 502.

(d) GRASSLAND (C): Land dominated by grassland and occasionally otherherbs; sometimes with widely scattered or grouped trees and shrubs,the canopy cover of which does not exceed 2Z. In this study, thecategory is distinguished as land cover type 9 i.e. opengrassland. Where the tree or shrub canopy is between 2-202, twoother categories are distinguished depending on the habit of thewoody component:

(i) Wooded grassland (wg): Scattered trees with canopy coverbetween 2-20%

t(ii) Bushed grassland (Bg): Scattered shrubs with canopy coverbetween 2-20X. Distinction between Wg and Bg highly depends onground information.

(e) MBUCA (M): A Tanzanian term for a low flat grassy plain of "blackcotton" soil with impeded drainage. Three Land cover types aredistinguished under this category:


(ii) Mbuga with Scattered bush (Hb)

MiOi) Mbaga vith Scattered Cultivation (Mc): This is essentiallycultivation within a mbuga.

(f) CULTI.VATION (C): Areas of farming. Distinction is made as folLows:

(i) Open Cultivation (C): land dorminated by pure food crope-'1tivation.


(iii) Wtivation and bush reiants (Cb): Cultivation interpersedwith stands of bush.


(g) OTHRS: This category includes thuse which could not be fitted inany of the foregoing categories. They include:

ti) Urban Settlement (U)

ANNMX 4Page 5 of 73

tii) Bareground (Bag): This could be a result of land degradationprocesses; human activities, or natural processes.

(iii) Salt Bareground (Bag(s)): This category covers saltybareground, which is mainly along the coast and normallyinterpressed with mangrove vegetation.

(iv) Grass and bare rock (Gbr): These are large rock outcrops whichare partly covered by grass while other portions are bare rockoutcrops.


S~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~J

ANNEX 4Page 6 of 73

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT: DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER: 148/3MAPSHEET NAME: RUANDA

-------------------------------------------------------------------- _

rREA % ofCATEGORY LAND COVER TYPE (ha) mapsheet

Area--------------------------------------------------------------- __---

I. FORESTRY (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn) 1856.25 7.682. Mangrove Forests(Fn)(m)3. Forest Plantation (Pp)TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W) 4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 8118.75 33.595. Open Woodland (Wo) 3457.5 14.22TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B) 6. Thicket (T) 1518.75 6.2e7. Dense Bushland (Bd) 375 1.558. Open Bushland (Do) 5:37.5 2.22TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GLASSLAND (G) 9. Open Grassland (6)10. Wooded Grassland (Wg) 87.5 0.3611. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 1143.75 4.73TOTAL GRASSLAND

V. MBUGA (M) 1-. Mbuqa with grass (Mg)13. Mbuga with scattered bush (Mb)14. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc)TOTAL MBUGA (M)

VI. CULTIVATION(C) 15. Open cultivation (C) 3918.75 16.2116. Cultivation with

tree crops (Ct)17. Cultivation and bush

remnants (Cb) ,175 13.1418. Cultivation and tree

remnants (Ct)TOTAL CULTIVATION (C>)

VII. OTHERS 19. Urban settlement (U)20. Bareground (Bags)21. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA 24168.75 100

ANNEX 4Page 7 of 73

AREA COVERAGE COVER

PROJECT SEGMENTs DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER:148/4MAPSHEET NAME: KWASUNGA

CATEGORY LAND COVER TYPE AREA % oS(ha) mapsheet

Area…--------------------------------------------------------------__----

I. FORESTRY (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn) 475.0 0.612..Mangrove Forests(Fn)(m)3. Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W) 4. Dense Woodkabd (Wd) 9568.75 12.315. Open Woodland (Wo) 7712.5 9.93TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B). 6. Thicket (T) 5100.0 6.567. Dense Bushland (Bd) 9143.75 11.778. Open Bushland (Bo) 3643.75 4.69TOTAL BUSHLAND (9)

IV. GRASSLAND (G) 9. Open Grassland (G)10. Wooded Grassland (Wg) 15625. 20.111. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 11825.0 15.22TOTAL GRASSLAND

V. MBUGA (M) 12. Mbuga with grass (Mg)13. Mbuga with scattered

bush (Mb)14. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc)TOTAL MBUGA

VI.CULTIVATION (C)15. Open cultivation (C) 6693.75 8.6216. Cultivation with

tree crops (Ct)17. Cultivation and bush

remnants (Cb) 7912.5 10.1818. Cultivation and tree

remnants (Ct)TOTAL CULTIVATION (C.)

VII. OTHERS 19. Urban settlement (U)20. Bareground (Bags)21. Salt Bareground

(Bags) (s)22. Grass and bare rock

(Gbr)23. Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL 77700 100%

ANNEX 4Page 8 of 73

REA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT: DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 149/3MAPSHEET NAME: KWAMSISI

CATEGORY LAND COVER TYPE AREA * of(ha) mapsheet

Area

I. FORESTRT (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn) 75.0 0.122. .Mangrove Forests (Fn)(m)3. Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)


III. BUSHLAND (B) 6. Thicket (T) 395O.0 6.177. Dense Bushland (Bd) 4243.75 6.638. Open Bushland (Bo) 10487.50 16.38TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (S) 9. Open Grassland (S)10. Wooded Grassland (Wg) 8481.25 13.2411. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 9781.25 15.27TOTAL GRASSLAND


mbuga (Mb)14. Mbuga with scatered

cultivation (Mc) 237.5 0.37TOTAL MBUGA (M)

VI. CULTIVATION (C)15. Open cul.tivation (c) 4462.5 6.9716. Cultivation with

tree crops (Ct) 1518.75 2.3717. Cultivation and bush


remnants (Ct)TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+)


(Bags) (S)22. Grass and bare rock

(Gbr)23. Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA 64031.25 100%

ANNE 4Page 9 of 73

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT: DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER: 167/1MAPSHEET NAME: MSWEWE

CATEGORY LAND COVER TYPE AREA % of(ha) Mapsheet

Area

I. FORESTRY (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fr) 1525 4.882. Mangrove Forests (Fn)(m)3. Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W) 4. Sense Woodland (Wd) 18525 49.505. Open Woodland (Wo) 7218.75 19.29TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B) 6. Thicket (T) 137.5 0.377. Dense Bushland (8d) 1775 4.748. Open Bushland (Bo)TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (G) 9. Open Grassland (6)10. Wooded Grassland (Wg) 2587.5 6.9611. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 1618.75 4.33TOTAL GRASSLAND

V. MBUGA (M) 12. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 293.75 0.7813. Mbuga with scattered

bush (Mb) 62.5 0.1714. Mbuga with scattered


VI. CULTIVATION (C)15. Open cultivation (C) 2668.75 7.1316. Cultivation with tree




VII. OTHERS 19. Urban settlement (U)20. Bareground (Bags)21. Salt Bareground (Bags)(s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow) 18.75 0.05GRAND TORAL AREA 37425. 100%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT: DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER: 167/2MAPSHEET NAME: MIONO

…----------------------------------------------------------------CATEGORY LAND COVER TYPE AREA of

(ha) Mapsheet…_______________ -----------------------------------------------

I. FORESTRT (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn) 1593.75 2.092. Mangrove Forests (Fn)(m)3. Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W) 4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 7937.5 10.425. Open Woodland (Wo) 14043.75 la.43TOTAL WOODLAND ( W

III. BUSHLAND (B) 6. Thicket (T) 368.75 0.487. Dense Bushland (Bd) 2262.5 2.978. Open Bushland (Bo) 1681.25 2.21TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (6)9. Open Grassland (6)10. Wooded Grassland (Wg) 12075 15.8511. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 5143.75 6.75TOTAL GRASSLAND


bush (Mb) 1175 1.5414. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 250 0.33TOTAL MBUGA (M)





VII. OTHERS 19. Urban settlement (U)20. Bareground (Bags)21. Salt Bareground (Bags(s)22. Grass'and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow) 25.0 0.03GRAND TOTAL AREA 76200. 100%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT: DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER: 168/1MAPSHEET NAME: MKANGE

…______________,__________________________-______________________CATEGORY LAND COVER TYPE AREA % of

(ha) MapsheetArea

--------------------------------------------------------------- __

I. FORESTRY (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn) 618.75 1.792. Mangrove Forests (Fn)(m)3. Forest Pkabtatuib (Fp)TOTAL FORESTRY (F)


III. BUSHLAND (B) 6. Thicket (T) 9737.5 21.357. Debse Bushland (Bd) 2450.0 5.3.78. Open Bushland (Do) 7306.25 16.02TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (G)9. Open Grassland (G) 343.75 0.7510. Wooded Grassland (Wg) 2325.0 5.0911. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 14312.5 31.38TOTAL GRASSLAND (G)

V. MBUGA (M) 12. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 1_,1.25 0.2913. Mbuga with scattered

bush (Mb) 37.5 0. 0814. Mbuga with scattered


VI. CULTIVATION (C)15. Open cultivation (C)16. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) 1506.25 . 3017. Cultivation and bush


remnants (CT) 37.5 Q.02TOTAL CULTIVATION (C*)

VII. OTHERS 19. Urban settlement (U)20. Bareground (Bags)21. Salt Bareground (Bags)Cs)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA 45618.75 100%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT: DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER: 163/4MAPSHEET NAME: MPWAPWA

--------------------------------------------------------------- __----


Area

I. FORESTRY (F) 1. NAtURAL FOREST (Fn) 1106.25 4.482. Mangrove Forests (Fn)(m)3. Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W) 4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 11000.0 44.585. Open Woodland (Wo) 6- .5 0.25STOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B) 6. Thicket tT)7. Dense Bushland (Bd) 25.0 0.108. Open Bushland (Bo) 225.0 0.9?1TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (6) 9. Open Grassland (G)10. Wooded Grassland (Wg) 18.75 0.0811. Bushed Grassland (Bg)TOTAL GRASSLAND (9)





crops (Ct) :2.50. o 1.0117. Cultivation and bush


remnants (CT) 112.50 0.46TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+)

VII. OTHERS 19. Urban settlement (U) 18.75 0.0820. Bareground (Bags) 87.50 O.3621. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr) 18.75 0.0823. Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA 24675. 100%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT eEGMEN: DAR ES SALA MAPSHEET NUMBER: 164/ZMAPSHEET NAME: TUBUNGWE…____________________________ - --------------------------------

CATEGORY . LAND COVLt TYPE- AREA % of(ha) Mapsheet

Area--------------------------------------------------------------- __

I. FORESTRY (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn) 112.5 0.142. MANGROVE fORESTS (Fn)(m)_. Forest Plantation (Fp) 237.5 0.31TOTAL FOREST (F)


-II. BUSHLAND (B) 6. Thicket (T) 1162.5 1.507. Sense Bushland (Bd) 1006.25 1.298. Open Bushland (Bo) 700 0.90TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (G) 9. Open Grassland (G) 175 0.2310. Wooded Grassland (Wg) 387.5 0.5011. Bushed Grassland (Bg)TOTAL GRASSLAND







remnants (CT) 9087.5 11.70TOTAL CULTIVATION (Ct))

VII. OTHERS 19. Urban settlement (U)20. Bareground (Bags) 306.25 0.3921. Salt Bareground (Bags)(s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr) 743.75 0.9523. Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 100%

AN=IE 4.Page 14 of 73

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT: DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBERs 164/4MAPSHEET NAME: RUSEHO

CATEGORY LAND COVER AREA AREA % of(ha) Mapsheet

Area

I. FORESTRY (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn) 7143.75 9.952. Mangrove Forests (Fn)(m)3. Forest Plantation (Fn)TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W) 4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 33537.5 46.77S. Open Woodland (Wo) 12643.75 17.62TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B) 6. Thicket (T) 675 0.947. Dense Bushland (Bd) 31.25 0.048. Open Bushland (Bo)TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (6) 9. Open Grassland (G) -3325 4.6310. Wooded Grassland (Wg) 100 0.1411. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 175 0.24TOTAL GRASSLAND (8)





crops (Ct) 925 1.2917. Cultivation and bush

remnants (Cb) 4250 5.9218. Cultivation and tree

remnants (CT)TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+)


(Bags) (s) 143.75 0.2022. Grass and bare

rock (Gbr) 212.5 0.3023. Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA 71775.00 100%

AMN 4Page 15 of 73

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENTi DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER: 165/3MAPSHEET NAME, MAMBOYA

-----------------------------------------------------------------


Area-----------------------------------------------------------------

I. FORESTRY (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn) 6987.50 11.612. Mangrove Forests (En)(m). Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W) 4. Dense Woodland tWd) 43962.5 73.075. Open Woodland (Wo) 4925 8.18TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B) 6. Thicket (T)7. Dense Bushland (Bd)8. Open Bushland (Bo)TOTAL BUSHLAND (E)

IV. GRASSLAMD (G) 9. Open Grassland (G)10. Wooded Grassland (Wg) 362.5 0.6011. Bushed Grassland (Cg)TOTAL GRASSLAND (G)






remnants (Cb) 104-.75 1.7418. Cultivation and tree

remnants (CT)TOTAL CULTIVATION (C4)

VII. OTHERS 19. Urban settlement (U)20. Bareground (Bags)21. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA 60168.75 100%

AMIu 4Page 16 of 73

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENTa DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBERs 165/:-MAPSHEET NAME: MVOMERO


Area--------------------------------------------------------------- __-

I. FOREST (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn) 45Z1 9:2. Mangrove Forests (Fn((m)3. Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)


III. BUSHLAND (t) 6. Thicket (T)7. Dense Bushland (3d)S. Open Bushland (Bo)TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAMD (G)9. Open Grassland (G) 125.0 0.1610. Wooded Grassland (Wg) 3300.0 4.2511. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 1506.25 1.94TOTAL GRASSLAND (G)

V. MOUGA (M) 12. Mbuga with grass (Mg)13. Mbuga with scattered

bush (Mb) 11^.5 C).1414. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 1Z60:6.25 17.51TOTAL MBUGA (M)

VI. CULTIVATION (C)15. Open cultiv--ion (C) 22343.75 28.7616. Cultivation with tree





(Bags) (s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 100%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT: DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER: 166/3MAPSHEET NAMEs DAKAWA

---------------------------------------------------------------- _


Area-----------------------------------------------------------------

I. FOREST (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn) 1187 1.5:2. Mangrove Forests (Fn)tm)3. Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)


III. BUSHLAND (B) 6. Thicket (T) 675. 0.877. Dense Bushland (Bd) 4906.25 6.318. Open Bushland (So) 1131.25 1.46TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (C) 9. Open Grassland (S) 487.5 0.6310. Wooded Grassland (Wg) 20768.75 26.7311. Bushed GRASSLAND (Bg) 2412.5 3.10TOTAL GRASSLAND (B)

V. MBUGA (M) 12. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 4000 5.1513. Mbuga with scattered



VI. CULTIVATION (C)15. Open cultivation tC) 13862.5 17.8416. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb) 3193.75 4.1118. Cultivationand tree

remnants (CT) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C)

VII. OTHERS 19. Urban settlement (U)20. Bareground (Bags)21. Salt Bareground (Bags)(s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 100l.


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT: DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER: 16o/4MAPSHEET NAMEs DAKAWA

EAST-----------------------------------------------------------------


Area--------------------------------------------------------------- __

I. FOREST (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn 225 0.292. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m)3. Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)


III. BUSHLAND (B) 6. Thicket (T) 6e.75 0.097. Dense Bushland (Bd) 2325.0 3.008. Open Bushland (Bo) 4956.25 6.40TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (G)9. Open Grassland (S)10. Wooded Grassland (Wg) 39581.25 51.1111. Bushed Grassland (Bg)TOTAL GRASSLAND (G)

V. MBUGA (M) 12. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 1237.5 1.60'3. Mbuga with scattered

bush (Mb) 1800.0 .3214. Mbuga with scattered








AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT: DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER: 167/3MAPSHEET NAME: KWEDIREMA

…-------------------------------------------------------------_--


Area…----------------------------------------------------------------

I. FORESTRY (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn) 1237.5 1.65H. Mangrove Forests (Fn)(m)

3. Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)


III. BUSHLAND (B) 6. Thicket (T) 4006.25 5.Z67. Dense Bushland (Bd) 5368.75 7.18S. Open Bushland (Bo) 2862.5 .%-TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (G) 9. Open Grassland (S)10. Wooded Grassland (Wg) 28137.5 :37.6:.11. Bushed Grassland (Bg) e181.25 4.25TOTAL GRASSLAND (6)

V. MBUGA (M) 1. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 306.25 0.411Z. Mbuga with scattered

bush (Mb) 1725. . .14. Mbuga with scattered




remnants (Cb) 243.75 O--218. Cultivation and tree

remnants (CT) .TOTAL CULTIVATION (C)


ANNEM 4Page 20 of 73

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT: DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER: 167/4MAPSHEET NAME: MSATA

-----------------------------------------------------------------

CATEGORY LAND COVER TYPE AREA % oF(ha) Mapsheet

Area--------------------------------------------------------------- __

I. FORESTRY (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn) 34Z .75 0.452. Mangrove Forests (Fn)(m). Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)

rI. WOODLAND (W) 4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 1818.-75 2.765. Open Woodland (Wo) 6100.0 7.922TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

IIT. BUSHLAND (B) 6. Thicket (T) 4750.0 6.177. Dense Bushland (Bd) 3256.25 4.238. Open Bushland (So) 8868.75 11.52TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (G) 9. Open Grassland (G) 243.75 0.3210. Wooded Grassland (Wg) 17912.50 23.26il. Bushed Grassland (Bd) 2856.25 3.71TOTAL GRASSLAND (G)

V. MBUGA (M) 12. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 1143.75 1.491.. Mbuga with scattered

bush (Mb) 50.X:> 0.0614. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 1825. 0 2.37TOTAL MBUGA (M)


crops (Ct) 256.25 0. 3717. Cultivation with bush

remnants (Cb) :1611.25 27.7618. Cultivation and tree

remnants (CT)TOTAL CULTIVATION (C)

VII. OTHERS .9. Urban settlement (U)20. Bareground (Bags)21. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA 770'6.25 100%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT: DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER: 168/3MAPSHEET NAME:

-------------------------------------------------------------- __-

CATEGORY LAND COVER TYPE AREA X. of(ha) Mapsheet

Area

I. FORESTRY (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn) 4193.75 5.452.-Mangrove Forests (Fn)(m)3. Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W) 4. Dense Woodland. (Wd) 4406.25 5.725. Open Woodland (Wo) 4631.25 6.01TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

1II. BUSHLAND (B) 6. Thicket (T) 16600.0 21.567. Dense Bushland (8d) 3943.75 5.128. Open Bushland (Bo) 8068.75 10.48TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (G) 9. Open Grassland (G) 1881.25 2.4410. Wooded Grassland (Wg) 9968.75 12.9511. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 14093.75 18.30TOTAL GRASSLAND (G)





crops (Ct) 3568.75 4.6317. Cultivation with bush



VII. OTHERS 19. Urban settlement (U)20. Baregound (Bags)21. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr) 168.75 0.2223. Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA 77006.25 100%

ANNX 4Page 22 of 73

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT: DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER: 16e/4MAPSHEET NAME:

…------------__-----------------------------------------------__-CATEGORY LAND COVER TYPE AREA % of

(ha) MapsheetArea

I. FORESTRY (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn)2. Mangrove Forests (Fn)(m) 2143.75 2.083. Forest Plantation (Fp) 12.50 0.01TOTAL FOREST (F)


III. BUSHLAND (B) 6. Thicket (T)7. Dense Bushland (Bd) 4593.75 4.46S. Open Bushland (Bo) 6118.75 5.94TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (G) 9. Open Grassland (G)10. Wooded Grassland (Wg) 1118.75 1.0911. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 787.50 0.77TOTAL GRASSLAND (G)




VI. CULTIVATION (C)15. Open cul-tivation (C) 1375 1.3416. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb) 7212.50 7.0118. Cultivation and bush


VII. OTHERS 19. Urban settlement (U) 312.50 0.3020. Bareground (Bags)21. Salt Bareground

(Bags) (s) 1331.25 1.2922. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow) *60531.25 58.79GRAND TOTAL AREA 102962.5 100%

MAMEZ 4Page 23 of 73

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENTa DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER: 180/2MAPSHEET NAME: KIBAKWE

--------------------------------------------------------------- __


Area--------------------------------------------------------------- __

I. FORESTRY (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn) 3-31.25 0.892.. Mangrove Forests (Fn)(m)3. Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W) 4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 10625. 28.635. Open Woodland (Wo) 7025 18.93TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B) 6. Thicket (T)7. Dense Bushland (Bd) 68.75 0.198. Open Bushland (Bo) 112.5 0.30TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. BRASSLAND (G) 9. Open Grassland (6)10. Wooded Grassland (Wg)11. Bushed Gras=land (Bg)TOTAL GRASSLAND

V. MBUGA (M) 1-. Mbuga with grass (Mg)is,. Mbuga with scattered



VI. CULTIVATION (C)15. Open cultivation (C) 17725. 47.7716. Cultivation with tree



remnants (CT)TOTAL CULTIVATION' (C+)

VII. OTHERS 19. Urban settlement :U)20. Bareground (Bags) 6.25 0. ('-21. Salt Pareground (Bags) (5)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA 37106.25 100%

AMN 4Page 24 of 73

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT: DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER: 181/1MAPSHEET NAME: KIDETE


Area

I. FORESTRY (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn)2. Mangrove Forests (Fn)(m).. Forest Okabtatuib (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W) 4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 32056.25 46.315. Open Woodland (Wo) 8687.5 12.55TOTAL WOODLAND

III. BUSHLAND (B) 6. Thicket (T) 175 o.257. Dense Bushland (Bd) 50 0.078. Open Bushland (Bo) 218.75 0.32

IV. GRASSLAND (G) 9. Open Grassland (G) 81.25 0.1210. Wooded Grassland (Wg)11. Bushed Grassland (Bg)TOTAL GRASSLAND (G)

V. MBUGA (M) 12. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 106. 25 0.1.51. Mbuga with scattered

bush (Mb) 156.2 t5 O.=14. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 21. 5 2. -0TOTAL MBUGA (M)

VI. CULTIVATION (C)15. Open cultivation (c) 20862.5 370.1416. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb) "6- 7.5 5.2518. Cultivation and tree

remnants (CT) 962.5 1. _96TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+)

VI. OTHERS 19. Urban settlement (U)20. Bareground (Bags)21. Salt Bareground(Bags)(s)t2. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow) 18.75 0.037_GRAND TOTAL AREA 69=:5.00 100?O%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT: DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 181/2MAPSHEET NAME: MUNISIGARA


Area

I. FORESTRY.(F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn)2. Mangrove Forests (Fn)(m)3. Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)


III. BUSHLAND (8) 6. Thicket (T)7. Dense Bushland (Bd) 4637.5 11.008. Open Bushland (So) 375.0 0.73TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (G) 9. Open Grassland (6)10. Wooded Grassland (Wg) 1318.75 2.5711. Bushed Grassland (Bg)TOTAL GRASSLAND






remnants XCb) 4712.5 9.2018. Cultivation and tree

remamts (CT)TOTAL CULTIVATION (c)

VII. OTHERS 19. Urban settlement (U)20. Bareground (bags)21. Salt Bareground (Bags)(s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr) '7.5 0.0723. Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA 51237.5 100%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENTs DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER: 182/1MAPSHEET NAME: RUDEWA

--------------------- ____---------------------------------------_


Area--------------------------------------------------------------- __-

I. FOREST IF) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn) 2362.5 4.272. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m)Z. Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)


III. BUSHLAND (B) 6. Thicket (T)7. Dense Bushland (Bd) 787.5 1.428. Open Bushland (So) 825 1.49TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

rV. GRASSLAND (G) 9. Open Grassland (G) 918.75 1.6610. Wooded Grassland (Wg) 243.75 0.4411. Bushed Grassland (Bg)TOTAL GRASSLAND (C)








VII. OTHERS 19. Urban settlement (U)20. Baregound (Bags)21. Salt Bareground (Bags)(s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA 55312.50 100%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT: DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER: 182/2MAPSHEET NAMEs LUTINDI

CATEGORY LAND COVER TYPE AREA *X of(ha) Mapsheet

Area--------------------------------------------------------------- __

I. FORESTRY,(F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn) 2450 3.152. Mangrove Florests (Fn)(m)3. Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W) 4. Dense Woodland CWd) 9193.75 11.8_5. Open Woodland (Wo) 11187.5 14.40TOTAL WOODLAND (W)


IV. GRASSLAND (G) 9. Open Grassland (6)10. Wooded Grassland 4456.25 5.7411. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 2587.5 3.33TOTAL GRASSLAND (G)


bush (Mb) 4900 6.3014. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 12325.0 15.86

VI. CULTIVATION (C)15. Open cultivation (C) Z606.25 4.64

* 16'.''Cul'ti'vation with'"tree'''--'''' '''-- crops (Ct) 3606.25 4.64

17. Cultivation with bushremnants (Cb) 4268.75 5.49


TOTAL CULTIVATION •C+))

VII. OTHERS 19. Urban Settlement (U)20. Bareground (Bags)21. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s)2. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 100l

ANNEX 4Pase 28 of 73

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT. DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBERI 183/1MAPSHEET NAME: NGURU YA NOEGE


Area-----------------------------------------------------------------r. FORESTRV (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn) 1118.75 1.44

2. Mangrove Forests (Fn)(m)7. Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W) 4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 656.25 0.855. Open Woodland (Wo) 4400 5.66TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (S) 6. Thicket (T) 662.5 0.857. Dense Bushland (Bd) 23068.75 29.698. Open Bushland (So) 19125 24.61TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (G) 9. Open Grassland (6) 356.25 0.4610. Wooded Grassland (Wg) 10518.75 13.5411. Bushed Grassland (Cg) 4731.25 6.09TOTAL GRASSLAND (6)

V. MBUGA (M) 1.2. Mbuga with grasss (Mg) 725 0.9_i_. Mbuga with scattered

bush (Mb) 1825 .3514. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc)TOTAL MBUGA (M) -

VI. CULTIVATION (C)15. Open cultivation (C) 5450 7.0116. Cultivation with tree




VII. OTHERS 19. Urban settlement (U)'20. Bareground (Bags)1. Salt Bareground (Bags)

22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)3. Open water (Ow) 6.25 0.00

GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.0 0 100-.


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT: DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBERs 183/2MAPSHEET NAMEs MKONO WA MARA

CATEGORY LAND COVER TYPE AREA % of(ha) M4psheet

Area--------------------------------------------------------------- __

I. FORESTRY, (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn) 3062.5 '3.942. Mangrove Forests (Fn)(m)3. Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W) 4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 7606.25 9.8C5. Open Woodland (Wo) 17062.5 21.96TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B) 6. Thicket CT) 2118.75 2.737. Dense Bushland (Bd) 2493.75 3.21S. Open Bushland CBo) 22362.5 28.78TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND CS) 9. Open Grassland (G)10. Wooded Grassland (Wg) 25.0 0.0311. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 925.0 1.19TOTAL GRASSLAND (G)




VI. CULTIVATION tC)15. Open cultivation (C) 6850.0 8.8216. Cultivation with tree



remnants (CT)TOTAL CULTIVATION tC+)

VII. OTHERS 19. Urban settlement (U)20. Bareground (Bags)21. Salt Bareground (Bags) Cs)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow) 462.5 0.59GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 100%

ANNEX 4PagSeW3 of 73

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT: DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER: 184/1MAPSHEET NAME: USENA ZOMOZI

CATEGORY LAND COVER TYPE AREA % of(Ha) Mapsheet

Area

I. FORESTRY (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn) 4343.75 5.592..Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m)3. Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)


1II. BUSHLAND (B) 6. Thicket (T) 1481.25 1.917. Dense Bushland (Bd) 5262.5 6.778. Open Bushland (So) 1375.0 1.77TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (S) 9. Open Grassland (6) 6.25 0.0010. Wooded Grassland (Wg) 6568.75 8.4511. Bushed Grassland (Bg)TOTAL GRASSLAND (6)

V. MBUGA (M) 12. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 162.5 0.21I1. Mbuga with scattered




crops (Ct) 4887.5 6.?917. Cultivation and bush

remrants (Cb) 9318.75 11.9918. Cultivation and tree

remnants (CT)TOTAL CULTIVATION ?C+)

VII. OTHERS 19. Urban settlement (U)20. Bareground (Bags)21. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr) 75.0 0.1023. Open water (Ow) 6.25 0.00GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 100%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT: DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER: 184/2MAPSHEET NAME, CHALINZE

-----------------------------------------------------------..- __--

CATEGORY LAND COVER TYPE AREA ,; of(Ha) Mapsheet

Area--------------------------------------------------------------- __

'. FORESTRY (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn) 793.75 1.022. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m)3. Forest FPlantation (Fp) 31.25 6.04TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W) 4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 1256 .25 1.625. Open Woodland (Wo) 493.75 0.64TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (E) 6. Thicket (T) 7537.5 9.707. Dense Bushland (Sd) 5400.0 6.958. Open Bushland (Bo) 8875.0 11.42TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (G) 9. Open Grassland (G) 131.25 0.1710. Wooded Grassland (Wg)11. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 11037.5 14.21TOTAL GRASSLAND (G)

V. MBUGA (M) 12. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 937.5 1 .1. Mbuga with scattered

bush (Mb) 73.25. t 0.4214. Mbuga with scattered



crops (Ct) 1968.75 2.ZZ17. Cultivation and bush

remnants (Cb) 21925.0 28.2218. Cultivation ano tree

remnants (CT)TOTAL CULTIVATION (C.)

VIIT. OTHERS 19. Urban settlement (U)20. Bareground (Bags)21. Salt Bareground (Bi.gs) (s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr) 25. 0 0.0.23. Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 1c)Q'%

ANNEX 4


PROJECT SEGMENT: DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER: 185/1MAPSHEET NAME: MLANDIZI

-------------------------------------------------------------- __-


Area--------------------------------------------------------------- __

I. FORESTRY (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn) 893 .75 1.162. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m)

. Forest Plantation iFp)TOTAL FOREST (F)

'I. WOODLAND (W) 4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 14l.5 1.865. Open Woodland (Wo) 546.3 4.50TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

lII. BUSHLAND (B) 6. Thicket CT) 9587.5 12,457. Dense Bushland (Bd) 4925. 6.40e. Open Bushland (Bo) 12-93.75 16.09TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)


V. MBUGA (M) 12. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 550 0.71-_. Mbuga with scattered

bush (Mb) 887.5 1.S114. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 5387.5 7. 0oTOTAL MBUGA (M)

VI. CULTIVATION (C)1S. Open cultivation (C) 6856.25 8.9016. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) 2f062.5 2.6817. Cultivation and bush


remnants (CT)TOTAL CULTIVATION (C-)

VII. OTHERS 19. Urban settlement (U)20. Bareground (Bags)21. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s)2-. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA 77006.25 100l.


AREA COVERAGE DATA


-------------------------------------------------------------- __-


Area-----------------------------------------------------------------

I. FORESTRY (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn) 1081.25 1.392. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m):3. Forest. Plantation (Fp) 1112.50 1.43TOTAL FOREST (F)


III. BUSHLAND (B) 6. Thicket (T)7. Dense Bushland (Bd) 1106.25 1.428. Open Bushland (Bo) 1512.50 1.95TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (G) 9. Open Grassland (G)10. Wooded Grassland (Wg) 9631.25 12.6511. Bushed Grassland (Bg)TOTAL GRASSLAND (G)


bush (Mb) 19Z.75 0.2514. Mbuga with scattered





remnants (CT)TOTAL CULTIVATION (C-)

VII. OTHERS 19. Urban settlement (U) 143.75 0.1920. Bareground (Bags) 31.25 0.0421. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 100%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT: DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER: 186/1MAPSHEET NAME: KAWE

---------------------------------------------------------------------


Area----------------------------------------------------------------------

I. FORESTRY (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn)2. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m) 212E.0 2.313. Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)


TII. BUSHLAND (B) 6. Thicket (T)7. Dense Bushland (9d) 3056.25 3.3B. Open Bushland (Bo)TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (6) 9. Open Grassland (S)10. Wooded Grassland (Wg) 3181.25 3.4711. Bushed Grassland (Bg)TOTAL GRASSLAND (6)

V. MBUGA CM) 12. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 281.25 0.3113. Mbuga with scattered






remnants (CT) -

TOTAL CULTIVATION (C.)

VII. OTHERS 19. Urban settlement (U) 21,31.25 2.3220. Bareground (Bags) 231.25 0.2521. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s) 1243.75 1.3522. Grass and bare rock (Gbr) 231.25 0.2523. Open water (Ow) 38100.0 41.50GRAND TOTAL AREA 91806.25 100%

ANNEX 4Page 35~ of 73

AREA COVERAGE DATA g

PROJECT SEGMENT: DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER: 18eZ/MAPSHEET NAME: MOROGORO

-------------------------------------------------------------- __-----


Area--------------------------------------------------------------- __----

I. FORESTRY (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn) 62 .50 0.312. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m)3. Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W) 4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 25.0 6.1_5. Open Woodland (Wo) 1431.25 7.15TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B) 6. Thicket (T) 100.0 0.507. Dense*Bushland (Sd) 1181.25 5.9f.0S. Open Bushland (So) 2=43.75 11.70TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (G) 9. dpen Grassland (G)10. Wooded Grassland (Wg)11. Bushed Grassland (8g)TOTAL GRASSLAND (6)

V. MSUGA (M) 12. Mbuga with grass (Mg)1U. Mbuga with scattered


cultivation (Mc) 1068.75 5.--4TOTAL MBUGA (M)



remnants (Cb) 42-5. 021. 10f18. Cultivation and tree

remnants (CT)TOTAL CULTIVATION .(C+)

VII. OTHERS 19. Urban settlement (U)20. Bareground (Bags)21. Salt Bareground (Sags) (s)- . Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA 20025. 00 1,00.


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT: DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER: 183/4MAPSHEET NAME: KINGULWIRA

-----------------------------------------------------------------


Area--------------------------------------------------------------- __

I. FORESTRY (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn) 43.75 0.222. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m)

. Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)

rI. WOODLAND (W) 4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 2556.25 12.785. Open Woodland (Wo) 7356.25 36.78TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND '%B) 6. Thicket (T) 412.5 2.147. Dense Bushland (9d) 937.5 4.698. Open Bushland (Bo)TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (G) 9. Open Grassland (6)10. Wooded Grassland (Wg)11. Bushed Grassland (Bg)TOTAL GRASSLAND (G)

V. MBUGA (M) 12. Mbuga with grass (Mg)13. Mbuga with scat'ered


cultivation (Mc) 25 0. 1TOTAL MBUGA (M)



remnants (Cb) 362.5 1.8118. Cultivation and- tree


VII. OTHERS 19. Urban settlement (U) 600.0 3.0020. Bareground (Bags)21. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA :0000 100%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT: DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER: 184/3MAPSHEET NAME: NGERENGERE

_________________________________________________________________


Area--------------------------------------------------------------- __

I. FORESTRY (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST tFn) 450.0 0.592.-Mangrove Forests tFn) (m)3. Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W) 4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 4962.5 6.505. Open Woodland (Wo) 16656.25 21.83TOTAL WOODLAND CW)

III. BUSHLAND (8) 6. Thicket tT) 5662.5 7.427. Dense Bushland tBd) 4237.5 5.558. Open Bushland (Bo) 1618.75 2.12TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

£




cultivation (Mc) 306.25 0.40TOTAL MBUGA CM)

VI. CULTIVATION (C)15. Open cultivation CC) 12062.5 15.8116. Cultivation with tree



remnants (CT) .TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+)

VII. OTHERS 19. Urban settlement (U) 143.75 0.1920. Bareground (Bags)21. Salt Bareground (Bags) Cs) 31.25 0.0422. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA 76312.50 100%


AREA COVERAGE DATA



Area----------------------------------------------------------------------

I. FORESTRY (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn) 1000 1.302. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m)3. Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)


III. BUSHLAND (B) 6. Thicket (T) 21906.25 28.457. Dense Bushland (8d) 493.75 0.648. Open Bushland (Bo) 5968.75 7.75TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (S) 9. Open Grassland (S) 150 0.2010. Wooded Grassland (Wg)11. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 15456.25 20.07TOTAL GRASSLAND (6)

V. MBUGA (M) 12. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 850 1.1013. Mbuga with scattered






remnants (Ct) -TOTAL CULTIVATION (Co)

VII. OTHERS 19. Urban settlement (U)20. Bareground (Bags)21. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA 77006.25 100/.

.ANNEX 4




Area

I. FORESTRY (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST (Fn) 33-47.75 4.342. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m)3. Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W) 4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 11112.5 14.4E5. Open Woodland (Wo) 854-.75 11-09TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B) 6. Thicket (T) 4325 5.627. Dense Bushland (Bd) 287.5 0.378. Open Bushland (Bo) 5256.25 6.83TOTAL BUSHLAND (<)

IV. GRASSLAND (G) 9. Qpen Grassland (G) 56.25 0.0710. Wooded Grassland (Wg) 2o81.25 2.7011. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 3518.75 4.57TOTAL GRASSLAND (G)

V. MBUGA (M) 12. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 8243.75 10.71l3. Mbuga with scattered






remnants (CT)TOTAL CULTIVATION (C4-)

VII. OTHERS 19. Urban settlement (U)2l. Bareground (Sags)21. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA 77006.25 100%

ANNEX 4



…--------------------------------------------------------------------CATEGORY LAND COVER TYPE AREA *. of

(Ha) MapsheetArea

--------------------------------------------------------------- __----

I. FORESTRY (F) 1. NATURAL FOREST. (Fn) 1600.0 2.062. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m)3. Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W) 4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 8562.5 11. 025. Open Woodland (Wo) 696.5 8.96TOTAL WOODLAND (W)


IV. GRASSLAND (G) 9. Open Grassland (G) 168.75 0.2°10. Wooded Grassland (Wg) 12081.25 15.5511. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 525.0 0.67TOTAL GRASSLAND (G)





crops (Ct) 8181.25 10.5.317. Cultivation and bush


remnants (CT)TOTAL CULTIVATION (C1)

VII. OTHERS 19. Urban settlement (U20. Bareground (Bags)21. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)3. Open water (Ow) 493.75 0.64



AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 186/3MAPSHEET NAME KISARAWE

CATEGORY LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % of Mapsheet area

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural -Forest (Fn) 4243.75 5.562. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m) -3. Forest Plantation (Fp) 175 0.23


II. WOODLAND (W)4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 2812.5 3.69S. Open Woodland (Wo) 1843.75 2.42


1II. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket (T) - -7. Dense Bushland (Bd) 1637.5 2.158. Open Bushland (Bo) 3856.25 5.05


IV. GRASSLAND (G+)9. Open Grassland (G) 1731.25 2.2710. Wooded Glassland (Wg) - -il. Bushed Grassland (kg) 1268.75 1.66

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+) -

V. MBUGA (M)12. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 200 0.2613. Mbuga with scattered

bushes (Mb) - -14. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 1412.5 1.85TOTAL MBUGA (M) -

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)15. Open Cultivation (C) 637.5 0.8316. Cultivation with tree



remnants (CT) 131.25 0.17%TOTAL CULTIVATION (C) - -

VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U) 8518.75 11.1620. Bare Ground (Bag) - -21. Salt Bareground (Sags) (s) - -22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr) - -

Open water (Ow)TOTAL OTHERS - -GRAND TOTAL AREA 76312.5 100%

AN=E 4Page 42 of 73

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 186/4MAPSHEET NAME D'Salaam

--------------------------------------------- __-------------------__-


--------------------------------------------- _________------------__-

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 406.25 0.392. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m) - -3. 'Forest Plantation (Fp) 1293.75 1.26


II. WOODLAND (W)4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 1118.75 1.095. Open Woodland (Wo) 425 0.41


III. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket (T) - -7. Dense Bushland (9d) 1518.75 1.48S. Open Bushland (Bo) 5481.25 5.33

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (64f-)9. Open Grassland (G) 1512.5 1.4710. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 1387.5 1.3511. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 4031.25 3.92

TOTAL GRASSLAND (6+)

V. MBUGA (M)12. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 606.25 0.5913. Mbuga with scattered






remnants (CT) - -TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+) - -

VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U) 6425 6.2420. Bare Ground (Bag) - -21. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s) 1 7.5 1.2022. Grass and bare rock (Gbr) - -23. Open water (Ow) 51325 49.88

TOTAL OTHERS - -GRAND TOTAL AREA 102900 100

ANNEX 4


PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 201/2MAPSHEET NAME

--------------------------------------------------------------- __----

CATEGORY LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % o4 Mapsheet area

…-----------------------------------------------------------------__-

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 600.0 1.82

Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m) - -7. 'Forest Plantation (Fp)


II. WOODLAND (W)4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 5443.75 16.515. Open Woodland (Wo) 4268.75 12.95

TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket (T) 31.25 0.107. Dense Bushland (Sd) 1000.0 :. 07S. Open Bushland (So) 5206.25 15.79

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (8+) ,9. Open Grassland (G) - -10. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 2425.0 7.3611. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 6050.0 18.35

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G+)

V. MBUGA (M)1 . Mbuga with grass (Mg)13. Mbuga with scattered

bushes (Mb) 425.0014. Mbuga with scattered


VI. CULTIVATION tC+)15. Open Cul:ivation (C) 21377.5 6.4816. Cultivation with tree




VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U)=0. Bare Ground (Sag)21. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)

Open water (Ow)TOTAL OTHERSGRAND TOTAL AREA 32968.75 100%.

ANM=E 4Page 44 of 73

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 202/1MAPSHEET NAME MKULAZI

---------------------------------------------------------------- __---


------------------------------------------------------------------ __-

I. FORESTs (F)1. * Natural Forest (Fn) 2625.X0 3.382. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m)



TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

1II. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thiciket (T) 0.856.25 4.967. Dense Bushland (Bd) 2200.0 2.-3S. Open Bushland (Bo) 2493.75 :3.1

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (6+) £

9. Open Grassland (6)10. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 29418.75 37.86II. Bushed Grassland (Bg)

TOTAL GRASSLAND (6.)

V. MBUGA (M)12. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 145C1.0:'0 1.90%17. Mbuga with scattered

bushes (Mb) 81. 25 0..1 014. Mbuga with scattered





remnants (C%lTOTAL CULTIVMTION (Co).

VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U)20. Bare Ground (Bag)21. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)

Open water (Ow)TOTAL OTHERSGRAND TOTAL AREA 77700.00 100%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 202/2MAPSHEET NAME MWANA


I. FOREST: (F) .1. 'Natural Forest (Fn) 4275 5.552. Mangrove Forests (Fn) tm)3. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F)


TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

IIr. BUSHLAND (3)6. Thicket (T) 7062.5 9.167. Dense Bushland (>d) 6706.25 8.708. Open Bushland (Bo) 3750.0 4.87

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND C6+)9. Open Grassland (S)10. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 275.0 0.3611. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 4806.25 6.24









VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U) 6425 6.2420. Bare Ground (Bag)21. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s) 1237.5 1.2022. Grass and bare rock (6br) - -23. Open water (Ow) 51325 49.88



AREA COVERAGE DATA



------------------------------------------------------------------ __-

I. FOREST: (F)1. .Natural Forest (Fn) ,3937.5 5.162. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m)3. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F)


TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket 'T)7. Dense Bushland (Bd) 21343.75 27.978. Open Bushland (Bo) 5156.25 6.76

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (G+)9. Open Grassland (G) 737.5 0.97

.10. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 2868.75 3.7611. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 7793.75 10.21





VI. CULTIVATION (Ce)15. Open Cultivation (C) 1275.0 1.6716. Cultivation with tree



remnants (CT)TOTAL CULTrVATION (C@)


Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA 76312.5 100%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 203/2MAPSHEET NAME MANEROMANGO


I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 2637.5 |.422. 'Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m)m3. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W)4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 17218.75 22.345. Open Woodland (Wo) 1687..5 2.19

TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket (T)7. Dense Bushland (Bd) 30693.75 39.838. Open Bushland (Bo) 2006.25 2.60

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (G+)9. Open Grassland (S) 143.75 0.1910. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 3968.75 5.1511. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 475 0.62


V. MBUGA (M)16. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 831.25 1.0C181-. Mbuga with scattered

bushes (Mb) 25 0,14. Mbuga with scattered

cultivation (Mc) 1C306.25 1.69TOTAL MBUGA (M)

VI. CULTIVATION (C@)15. Open Cultivation (C) 763.75 1.016. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb) 112^5 1.4618. Cultivation and tree

remnants (CT)TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+)'

VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U)120. Bare Ground (Bag) 1-5 0.1621. Salt Bareground (Bags) (5)22. Grass and bare rock CGbr)

Open water (Ow) 31.25 0.04GRAND TOTAL AREA 77068.75 100%

ANNEX 4


PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 204/1MAPSHEET NAME MKURANGA

----------------- _-__------------------------------------------__----

CATEGORY LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) '. o4 Mapsheet area

---------------- __--_---------------------------------------------__-

I. FOREST: (F)1. - Natural Forest (Fn)2. 'Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m)3. Forest Plantation tFp)

TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W)4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 2687.5 3.525. Open Woodland (Wo) 225O 3.74

TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

XII. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket (T)7. Dense Bushland (Bd) 17793.75 2-3.328. Open Bushland (Bo) 2412.5 3.16

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. rRASSLAND (G+)9. Open Grassland (G)

10. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 1650.0 2.1611. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 2625.0 3.44

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G6)

V. MBUGA (M)126. Mbuga with grass (Mg) T268.75 4.2-813. Mbuga with scattered

bushes (Mb) f7062.5 2.7014. Mbuga with scattered


VI. CULTIVATION (CC)15. Open Cultivation (C) 11837.5 15.5116. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb) 2.3-25.0 3.0 f518. Cultivation and tree

remnants (CT)TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+)-

VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U)20. Bare Ground (Bag) 393.75 0.5221. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow)


AMNX 4Page 49 of 73

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 204/2MAPSHEET NAME SHUNGUBWENI

------------------------------------------------------------ __----__-


-------- ___-------------------------------------------------------__-

$. FOREST: (F)1. - .Natural Forest (Fn)2. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m) 2212.5 2.793. Forest Plantation (Fp) 287.5 0.36

TOTAL FOREST (F)


TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket (T)7. Dense Bushland (Bd) 9156.25 11.56S. Open Bushland (Bo) 13243.75 16.71

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (6-)9. Open Grassland (G) 306.25 0.3910. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 1968.75 2.48II. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 15962.5 20.15




cultivation (Mc) 50.0 0.06TOTAL MSUGA (M)

VI. CULTIVATION (CC)15. Open Cultivation (C) 4437.5 5.6016. Cultivation with tree



remnants (Ct)TOTAL CULTIVATION (C4)

VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U)20. Bare Ground (Bag)21. Salt Bareground (Sags) (s) 4300.0 5.4322. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow) 5550.0 7.00


ANIEX 4Page 50 of 73

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 202/4MAPSHEET NAME KINUNDA

------------------------------------------------------------------- __

CATEGORY LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) X. of Mapsheet area

------------------------------------------------------------------ __-

I.- FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 168.75 0.992. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m)3. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F)


TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket (T) 1181.25 6.957. Dense Bushland (Bd) 368.75 2.17S. Open Bushland (Bo) 443.75 2.61

TOTAL BUtHLAND (S)

IV. GRASSLAND (6+)9. Open Grassland (6)10. Wooded Glassland (Wg)it. Bushed Grassland (Bg)


V. MBUGA CM)12. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 62.5 0.3713. Mbuga with scattered






remnants (Ct)TOTAL CULTIVATION (C-)

VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U)20. Bareground (Bags21. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow)

GRAND TOTAL AREA 17000 1 00/.

ANNX 4Page 51 of 73

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 203/3MAPSHEET NAME KISANGIRE

----------------------------------------------------------------- ____CATEGORY LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) / of Map

sheet area…-----------------------------------------------------------------__-

I. FOREST:. (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 181.25 1.692. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m)7. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W)4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 1856.25 17..35. Open Woodland (Wo) 337.5 3.62

TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket (T)7. Dense B.ishland (Bd) 6287.5 58.698. Open Bushland (Bo) 1206.25 11.26

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (6t)9. Open Grassland (G)10. Wooded Glassland (Wg)11. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 550.0 5.13


V. MBUGA (M)12. Mbuga with grass (Mg)1t. Mbuga with scattered








Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA 1071o2..50 100%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 203/4MAPSHEET NAME MSANGA


---------------------------------------------------------------------

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 150.0 0.23?2. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m)


II. WOODLAND (W)4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 15200 23.485. Open Woodland (Wo) 1350 2.09

TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket (T)7. Dense Bushland (Bd) 24800 38.318. Open BushXand (Bo) 5200 8.03

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (<+)9. Open Grassland (G) 25 0.0410. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 2618.75 4.05-1. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 1306.25 2.02

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G')

V. MBUGA CM)12. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 956.25 1.4°1o. Mbuga with scattered







VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U) 6.25 0.0020. Bare Ground (Bag) 18.75 0.0321. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)

Open water (Ow) 6.25 0.00GRAND TOTAL AREA 647731. 5 100%

AN= 4Page 53 of 73

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 204/3MAPSHEET NAME MAZOMORA


I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn)2. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m)3. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F)


TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

TIS. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket tT) 1612.5 2.097. Dense Bushland (Bd) 26712.5 34.668. Open Bush'land (Bo) 2525.0 3.27

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (G6)9. Open Grassland tG) 125.0 0.1610. Wooded Glassland (Wg)11. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 10156.25 13.18





VI. CULTIVATION (C+)15. Open Cultivation tC) 4006.25 5.2016. Cultivation with tree


remnants CCb) 2793.75 3.6218. Cultivation and tree

remnants (Ct) 243.75 0.3T2TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+)

VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U)20. Bare Ground (Bag) 162.5 0.2121. Salt Bareground (Bags) Cs)22. Grass and bare rock tGbr)

Open water (Ow) 68.75 0.09GRAND TOTAL AREA 77068.75 1007).


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 204/4MAPSHEET NAME KISIJU

---------------------------------------------------------------------

CATEGORY LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % o4 Mapsheet area

---------------------------------------------------------------------

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn)2. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m) 2093.75 2.723. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F)


TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket (T)7. Dense Bushland (9d) 3081.25 4.00S. Open Bushaand (Bo) 1950 2.53

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (G+)9. Open Grassland (G) 600 0.7810. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 918.75 1.1911. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 1106.25 1.44





VI. CULTIVATION CC+)15. Open Cultivation (C) 3668.75 4.7616. Cultivation with tree




VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U)20. Bare Ground (Bag)21. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s) 1631.25 2.1222. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow) 46075 59.83

GRAND TOTAL AREA 77006.75 10:J0


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 221/2MAPSHEET NAME KIBITI

------------ _-_--------------------------------------------------__--

CATEGORY LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % ot Mapsheet area

------------------------------------------------------------------ __-

t. FOREST: (F)1. -Natural Forest (Fn) 37551.25 55.462. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m)3. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F)


TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket (T) 2750.0 4.067. Dense Bushland (8d) 856.25 1.68. Open Bushland (So) 418.75 0.62

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (6+)9. Open Grassland (G) 575 0.8510. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 1425 2.1011. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 331.25 0.49


V. MBUGA (M)12. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 475.0 '0.'7013. Mbuga with scattered

bushes (Mb) 104Z.75 1.5414. Mbuga with scattered







Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA 67768.75 10o0


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 222/1MAPSHEET NAME BUNGU

…------------------------------------_----------------------------__-CATEGORY LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % of Map

sheet area…-----------------------------------------------------------------__ -

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 181.25 0.242. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m)3. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F)


TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket (T) 33812.5 44.317. Dense Bushland (8d) 2925 3.83S. Open Bushland (So) 1962.5 2.57

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (G+)9. Open Grassland (G)10. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 1262.5 1.6511. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 687.5 0.90

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G*)

V. MBUGA CM)12. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 906. 25 1 4 19

13. Mbuga with scatteredbushes (Mb) 2756.25 3Z.09

14. Mbuga with scatteredcultivation (Mc)TOTAL MBUGA (M)





VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U)20. Bare Ground (Bag) 4 425.0 0.5521. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow)

GRAND TOTAL AREA 76312.50 100t%

ANNEg 4Page 57 of 73

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 222/2MAPSHEET NAME MCHUNGO

------------------------------------------------------------------- __


I. FOREST: (F).. Natural Forest (Fn) 925.0 1.202. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m) 1025.0 1.33Z. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F)


TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

tII. BUSHLAND CB)6. Thicket (T) 237.5 0.3.17. Dense Bushland (Bd) 450.0 0.588. Open Bushland (Bo) 918.75 1.19

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (6+)9. Open Grassland (6) 581.25 0.7610. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 2231.25 2.9011. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 431.25 0.56


V. MBUGA (M)12. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 6.25 0.001.. Mbuga with scattered



VI. CULTIVATION (C+)1S. Open Cultivation (C) 243.75 0.3216. Cultivation with tree




VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U)20. Bare Ground (Sag) 906.25 1.1821. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s) 56.25 0.0722. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow) 65806.25

GRAND TOTAL AREA 77000.00 85.46

ANNEX 4Pape 58 of 73

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 221/3MAPSHEET NAME RUSENDE

------------------------------------------------------------------- __


------------------------------------------------------------------ __-

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn)2. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m)3. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F)


TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket (T)7. Dense Bushland (8d) 1068.75 4.088. Open Bushland (So) 3568.75 13.63

TOTAL BUSHLAND (S)

IV. GRASSLAND (6+)9. Open Grassland (6)10. Wooded 6lassland (Wg) 218.75 0.8411. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 150.0 0.57


V. MBUGA (M)12. Mbuga with grass (Mg)13. Mbuga with scattered




creps (Ct)17. Cultivation and bush



VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U)20. Bare Ground (Bag) 87.5 0.3321. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow) 881.25 3.37


AN= 4Pasge 59 of 73

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 221/4MAPSHEET NAME UTETE


--------------------------------------------------------------- --- __

I. FOREST:. (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 2987.5 :.9B2. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m)


II. WOODLAND (W)4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 4981.25 6.47S. Open Woo;!land (Wo) 31456.25 40.85

TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket (T) 200.0 0.267. Dense Bushland (Bd) 675.0 0.88S. Open Bushland (Bo) :568.75 4.6

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (6+)9. Open Grassland (G)10. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 781.25 1.0211. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 218.75 0.26


V. MBUGA (M)i_. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 1268.75 1.651V. Mbuga with scattered

bushes (Mb) 39Z.75 0.5114. Mbuga with scattered


VI. CULTIVATION (C-)15. Open Cultivation (C) 268.75 0.Z416. Cultivation with tree



remnants (Ct)TOTAL CULTIVATION -.)

VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U) 512.5 0.6720. Bare Ground (Bag) 406.25 0.5w.21. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)27. Open water (Ow) 1787.5 . Z

GRAND TOTAL AREA 77000.00 100'!.

ANNEX 4Page 60of 73

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 222/3MAPSHEET NAME KIKARE IKWIRIRI

------------------------------------------------------------------ __-


------------------------------------------------------------------ __-

I. FOREST:- (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 4t56.25 5.912. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m):3. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F)


TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket (T) 5012.5 6.507. Dense Bushland (Bd) 1237.5 1.61S. Open Bushland (Bo) 15718.75 20.40

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (6+)9. Open Grassland (G)10. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 987.5 1.2811. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 1550.0 2.01


V. MBUGA (M)12. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 1-.68.75 1.7813. Mbuga with scattered


cultivation (Mc) 7_7.5 :.66TOTAL MBUGA (M)

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)15. Open Cultivation (C) 3931.25. 5.1016. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) :768.75 4.8917. Cultivation and bush



VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U)20. Bare Ground (Bag) 7X5.0 0.9421. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)


.ANEX 4Page 61 of 73

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MAP8iHEET NUMBER 222/4MAPSHEET NAME SALALE


I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 418.75 0.542. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m) 29487.5 38.29


II. WOODLAND (W)4. Dense Woodland (Wd)5. Open Woodland (Wo) 75 0.10


III. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket (T)7. Dense Bushland (Bd) 206.25 O.278. Open Bushland (Bo) 137.5 0.18

TOTAL BUSMLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (G+)9. Open Grassland (G)10. Wooded Glassland (Wg)11. Bushed Grassland (8g)


V. MBUGA (M)12. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 10425 13.54i*. Mbuga with scattered



VI. CULTIVATION (C.)15. Open Cultivation (C)16. Cultivation with tree




VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U)20. Bare Ground (Bag)21. Salt Bareground (Bags) Cs) 3012.5 3.9122. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)



AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 239/1MAPSHEET NAME KICHI HILLS


------------------------------------------------------------------ __-

I. FOREST:. (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 22943.75 53.482. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m)Z. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W)4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 16350 38.115. Open Woodland (Wo) 2043.75 4.76

TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket (T)7. Dense Bushland (Bd) 831.25 1.948. Open Bushland (Bo)

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (6+)9. Open Grassland (G)

10. Wooded Glassland (Wg)11. Bushed Grassland (Bg)

TOTAL GRASSLAND (G6)



cultivation kMc)TOTAL MBUGA (M)

VI. CULTIVATION (CC+1S. Open Cultivation.(C)16. Cultivation with tree



remnants (Ct) 131.25 0.31TOTAL CULTIVATION (CC)

VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U)20. Bare Ground (Bag)21. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow) 137.5 0.32

GRAND TOTAL AREA 42900 100%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 239/2MAPSHEET NAME NYAMWAGE


------------------------------------------------------------------ __-

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 16.9Z.75 21.162. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m):3. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W)4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 179e7.5 23.365. Open Woodland (Wo) 277Z1.25 35.49

TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket (T)7. Dense Bushland (Bd) 462.5 0.603. Open Bushland (Bo) 4756.25 6.18

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (6+)9. Open Grassland (G) 56.25 0.0710. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 3256.25 4.23Ii. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 2097.5 2.71

TOTAL aRASSLAND (G+)

V. MBU6A (M)1. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 918.75 1.1917. Mbuga with scattered




crops (Ct) *,50 0.4617. Cultivation and bush


remnants (Ct)TOTAL CULTIVATION (C-)

VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement CU)20. Bare Ground (Bag) 181.25 0.2421. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)

Open water (Ow) 718.75 0.93GRAND TOTAL AREA 77006.25 1007.


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 240/1MAPSHEET NAME MOHORO


I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 7275 9.45

Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m) 206.25 o.273. Forest Plantation (Fp) 68.75 0.09

TOTAL FOREST (F)


TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket (T) 93.75 0.127. Dense Bushland (Sd) 5537.5 7.198. Open Bushland (Bo) 4900.0 6.36

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (G+)9. Open Grassland (G) 112.5 0.1510. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 2981.25 3.8711. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 1068.75 1.79


V. MBUGA (M)1. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 253X1.5 _.291_. Mbuga with scattered

bushes (Mb) 9850 _2.79

14. Mbuga with scatteredcultivation (Mc) 14106.25 18.32TOTAL MBUGA (M)

VI. CULTIVATION (C+)15. Open Cultivation (C) 1l306.25 1.7016. Cultivation with tree


remnants (Cb) '3575 4.6418. Cultivation and tree


VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U) 56.75 0 .0720. Bare Ground (Bag) 106.25 0.1321. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s) 268.75 0.3T522. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)

Open water (Ow) 2100 2.72GRAND TOTAL AREA 77006.75 100%

ANE 4Page 65 of 73

AREA COVERAGE DATA


---------------------------------------------------------------------


---------------------------------------------------------------------

I. FOREST: (F)i. Natural Forest (Fn)2. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m) 12843.75 16.683. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F)


TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket (T) 25 0.037. Dense Bushland (Bd) 3350 4.358. Open Bushland (Bo) 837.5 1.09

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (G+)9. Open Grassland (G) 2400 3.1210. Wooded Glassland (Wg)11. Bushed Grassland (Bg)


V. MBUGA (M)12. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 4775 6.2013. Mbuga with scattered





remnants (Cb) 2606.25 3.38la. Cultivation and tree


VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U)20. Bare Ground (Sag)21. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s) 3737.5 4.8522. Grass and bare -ock (Gbr)



AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 239/3MAPSHEET NAME KUNGURWE

------------------------------------------------------------------ __-


--------------------------- _---------__---------------------------__--

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 11093.75 18.092. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m)O. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F)



III. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket (T)7. Dense Bushland (Bd) 2912.5 4.758. Open Bushl,and (Bo) 23293.75 37.98

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND CG+)9. Open Grassland (S)10. Wooded 6lassland (Wg) 768.75 1.2511. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 318.75 0.52








remnants (Ct) 28C6.25 4.58TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+)

VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U)20. Bare Ground (Bag)21. Salt Bareground (Bags) (S)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)

Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA 61S35.00 99.99%


AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MARSHEET NUMBER 239/4MAPSHEET NAME KIPATIMU

--------- __-___---------------------------------------------------__-


------------------------------------------------------------------ __-

l. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 33100 42.982. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m):3. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F)


TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket (T) 62.5 0.087. Dense Bushland (Bd) 11212.5 14.698. Open Bushland (Bo) 17025 22.11

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (Ge)9. Open Grassland (G) 168.75 0.2210. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 2031.25 2.64i1. Bushed Grassland (Bg)

TOTAL GRASSLAND (6i)

V. MBUGA (M)1-. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 12.5 C:.013. Mbuga with scattered



VI. CULTIVATION (C-}15. Open Cultivation (C)16. Cultivation with tree





Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA 77006.25 100l%.

ANNX 4Page 68 of 73

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 240/2MAPSHEET NAME KINJUMBI


I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 10343.75 13.432. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m) 587.5 0.76.. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL cOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND (W)4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 28350.0 36.815. Open Woodland (Wo) 556.25 2

TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket (T) 13468.75 17.497. Dense Bushland (Bd) 2381.25 3.t098. Open Bushland (to) 1306.25 1.70

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

TV. GRASSLAND (G*)9. Open Grassland (6) 18.75 0.0210. Wooded Glassland (Wg)11. Bushed Grassland (Bg)

TOTAL GRASSLAND (6)

V. MBUGA (M)i1. Mbuga with grass (Mg)15. Mbuga with scattered






remnants (Ct) 9400.0 12.21TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+-)

VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U)20. Bare Ground (Bag)21. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s) 675.0 0.8822. Grass and bare rock (Gbr) 12.5 0.0C2



AREA COVERAGE DATA


---------------------------------------------------------------------


------------------------------------------------------------------ __-

I. FOREST: . (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn)2. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m) 13450 17.477. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F)


TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

.II. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket (T) 131.25 0.177. Dense Bushland (Bd) 1725 2.248. Open Bushland (Bo) 168.75 0.22

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV.. GRASSLAND (G+)9. open Grassland (G)10. Wooded Glassland (Wg)11. Bushed Grassland (9g)




cultivation (Mc)TOTAL MBUGA CM)





VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U)20. Bare Ground (Bag) 118.75 0.1521. .Salt Bareground (Bags) (s) 1193.75 1.5522. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)


AM=EX 4Page 70 of 73

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 255/1MAPSHEET NAME MBARALI

…-----------------------------------------------------------_------__CATEGORY LAND COVER TYPE AREA (ha) % of Map

sheet area…--------------------------------------------------------------------

I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 568.75 0.752. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m)3. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F)

II. WOODLAND CW)4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 4225 5.605. Open Woodland (Wo) 5043.75 6.69

TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket (T)7. Dense Bushland (Bd) 12356.25 16.38e. Open Bushland (Bo) 24781.25 32.86

TOTAL BUSHLAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (G+)9. Open Grassland (6) 250 0.3310. Wooded Glassland (Wg) 1418.75 1.88II. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 16937.5 22.46


V. MBUGA (M)12. Mbuga with grass (Mg) 7631.25 lf.12

13. Mbuga with scatteredbushes (Mb) 2206.25 2.93

14. Mbuga with scatteredcultivation (Mc)TOTAL MBUGA (M)





VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U)20. Bare Ground (Bag)21. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)23. Open water (Ow)


A=4Page 71 of 73

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 255/2MAPSHEET NAME KANDAWALE

-------------------------------------------------------------- __-----


I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 11168.75 14.50

Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m)Forest Plantation (Fp)TOTAL FOREST (F)


TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

-II. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket (T)7. Dense Bushland (Bd) 20806.25 27.028. Open Bushland (Bo) 11631.25 15.10

TOTAL BUSHLAND CB)

IV. GRASSLAND (G-)9. Open Grassland (S)10. Wooded Glassland (Wg)11. Bushed Grassland (Bg)


V. MBUGA (M)i2. Mbuga with grass (Mg)13. Mbuga with scattered


cultivation (Mc) 25537.5 3.z30TOTAL MBUGA (M)




remnants (Ct) 156.25 0.2C)TOTAL CULTIVATION (C+)



ANN= 4Page 72 of 73

AREA COVERAGE DATA

PROJECT SEGMENT DAR ES SALAAM MAPSHEET NUMBER 256/1MAPSHEET NAME MINGUMBI

------------------------------------------------------------------ __-


I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 10900 14.152. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m)


II. WOODLAND (W)4. Dense Woodland (Wd) 28540.75 :37.075. Open Woodland (Wo)

TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket (T) 9240.75 12. 0 07. Dense Bushland (Bd) 10000. 12.99S. Open Bushland (So) 1318.75 1.71

TOTAL BUSILAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (6+)9. Open Grassland (S)

10. Wooded Glassland (Wg)ll. Bushed Grassland (Bg)


V. MBUGA (M)12. Mbuga with grass (Mg)13. Mbuga with scattered


cultivation (Mc) 56.25 0.07TOTAL MSUGA (M)

VI. CULTIVATION (C.)15. Open Cultivation (C) Boo 1.0416. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) 2568.75 3. 3417. Cultivation and bush


remnants (Ct) 5375 6.98TOTAL CULTIVATION (C.)

VII. OTHERS:i9. Urban Settlement (U)20. Bare Ground (Sag)21. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s)22. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)

Open water (Ow)GRAND TOTAL AREA 77006.25 100.%


AREA COVERAGE DATA


---------------------------------------------------------------------


I. FOREST: (F)1. Natural Forest (Fn) 3875 5.032. Mangrove Forests (Fn) (m)m. Forest Plantation (Fp)

TOTAL FOREST (F)


TOTAL WOODLAND (W)

III. BUSHLAND (B)6. Thicket (T) 475 0.627. Dense Bushland (9d) 10006.25 12.998. Open Bushland (8o) 1381.25 1.79

TOTAL BUSALAND (B)

IV. GRASSLAND (G+)9. Open Grassland (6)10. Wooded Glassland (Wg)11. Bushed Grassland (Bg) 43.75 0.06


V. MBUGA CM)12, Mbuga with grass (Mg) 900 1.1713. Mbuga with scattered



VI. IULTIVATION CC+)15. Open Cultivation (C) 12.5 0.0216. Cultivation with tree

crops (Ct) 7B12.5 10.1517. Cultivation and bush



VII. OTHERS:19. Urban Settlement (U)20. Bare Ground (Ba-) 343.75 0.4521. Salt Bareground (Bags) (s) 2243.75 2.9122. Grass and bare rock (Gbr)


world bank/undp/bilateral aid energy sector...

Documents