wp 5: task 1 country reviews cristina chiotan ingrid stegeman eurohealthnet
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: WP 5: Task 1 country reviews Cristina Chiotan Ingrid Stegeman EuroHealthNet](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697bfa01a28abf838c95467/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
WP 5: Task 1 country reviews
Cristina ChiotanIngrid StegemanEuroHealthNet
![Page 2: WP 5: Task 1 country reviews Cristina Chiotan Ingrid Stegeman EuroHealthNet](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697bfa01a28abf838c95467/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
WWW.CHRODIS.EU
Country reviews publication
Questionnaire developed and agreed by WP5 partners (first WP5 meeting Cologne, 28-29 April 2014);
•14 partners sent their response to the questionnaire
•14 country reviews were edited and EN proof read;
•14 edited country reviews sent to partners for approval;
•country reviews approved by CHAFEA and posted on JA-CHRODIS website.
– focusing mainly on cardiovascular disease, stroke and diabetes type 2
– that also address major risk factors, like diet, inactivity, alcohol abuse and smoking -social determinants of health
– with a special focus on older people, inequalities
•For ‘Platform for Knowledge Exchange’, ‘Clearinghouse’
![Page 3: WP 5: Task 1 country reviews Cristina Chiotan Ingrid Stegeman EuroHealthNet](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697bfa01a28abf838c95467/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
WWW.CHRODIS.EU
Analysis of country reports
Objective:
To enable partners to learn about other countries, to facilitate the exchange of ideas and practices and to feed into a discussion and contribute to summary overview on the findings.
(not a mandatory project deliverable)
![Page 4: WP 5: Task 1 country reviews Cristina Chiotan Ingrid Stegeman EuroHealthNet](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697bfa01a28abf838c95467/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
WWW.CHRODIS.EU
Analysis of country reports
Results:
•Each partner will read 2 different country reports (one from a similar system and context and one from a very different system/context);
•Each partner follow specific questions on common issues, gaps and needs, lessons learned and opportunities for further exchange and learning
![Page 5: WP 5: Task 1 country reviews Cristina Chiotan Ingrid Stegeman EuroHealthNet](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697bfa01a28abf838c95467/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
WWW.CHRODIS.EU
Analysis of country reports
Criteria for groups of country analysis:
•The aim is to ensure a good basis for discussion and opportunities for experience exchange and further learning;
•Countries close geographically and also with similar policy and public health contexts and one country which brings a new perspective in the group;
•Each partner could read/analyse any other country report found relevant.
![Page 6: WP 5: Task 1 country reviews Cristina Chiotan Ingrid Stegeman EuroHealthNet](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697bfa01a28abf838c95467/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
WWW.CHRODIS.EU
Analysis of country reports
Proposed groups of partners:
•Norway , Iceland , Lithuania , UK
• Greece , Spain , Italy , Cyprus
•Ireland , Estonia , Germany
•Bulgaria , Netherlands , Portugal
![Page 7: WP 5: Task 1 country reviews Cristina Chiotan Ingrid Stegeman EuroHealthNet](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697bfa01a28abf838c95467/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
WWW.CHRODIS.EU
Analysis of country reports (guiding questions)
• Landscape: policies, structures, available resources;
similar but different complexity and level of specificity of policies; and in available resources
Health inequalities – 2 country reports
and healthy and active ageing – 7 country reports
![Page 8: WP 5: Task 1 country reviews Cristina Chiotan Ingrid Stegeman EuroHealthNet](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697bfa01a28abf838c95467/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
WWW.CHRODIS.EU
Analysis of country reports (guiding questions)
• Good practices approaches – similarities or not;
9 country reports have criteria, different approaches
3 reported databases;
• Health forecasting studies – 8 country reports, different approaches and methodologies;
![Page 9: WP 5: Task 1 country reviews Cristina Chiotan Ingrid Stegeman EuroHealthNet](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697bfa01a28abf838c95467/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
WWW.CHRODIS.EU
Analysis of country reports (guiding questions)
•Information on cost-effectiveness studies
in 9 country reviews, different approaches and methodologies
![Page 10: WP 5: Task 1 country reviews Cristina Chiotan Ingrid Stegeman EuroHealthNet](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697bfa01a28abf838c95467/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
WWW.CHRODIS.EU
Analysis of country reports (guiding questions)
•Gaps and needs – areas for exchange and potential support
Approaches in good practice criteria, methodology and use for cost-effectiveness and forecasting, use of available
resources, innovative financing sources