wp3 implementation of joint programming...

1

JHEPCoordination Action in support of the implementation

of a Joint Programming Initiative (JPI)

on Cultural Heritage and Global Change :

a new challenge for Europe

JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013

WP3

Implementation of Joint

Programming Initiative

Cristina Sabbioni

JPICH Coordination

2JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013

WP3 : OBJECTIVES (1)

- Implement the Strategic Research Agenda in the most

efficient and effective way through the definition of an

Action Programme.

- Create the networking between research actors and

institutions as a basis for the implementation of the SRA

- Define innovative methods of public / private research

partnerships.

- Decide on joint activities and actions, which follow the

principle of variable geometry


WP3 : OBJECTIVES (2)

- Analyze rules and procedures (administrative,

economic, etc..) for the realization of common calls, peer

review procedures for selection.

- Negotiate and securing the commitment and amount of

funding of the organizations participating in JP CH and

the structures necessary for implementation.

- Pool and coordinate national efforts making best use of

existing programmes, activities and instruments


WP3 : TASKS AND LEADERS

WP3 LEADER P1 MIBAC, Italy

Task 3.1. Develop the Action Programme

Task Leader P3 – RCE, Netherlands

Task 3.2. Maximizing benefit from existing European

initiatives for harmonization of activities within JPICH

Task Leader P4 – RPF, Cyprus

Task 3.3. Implementation of the Action Programme

Task Leader P1 – MIBAC, Italy

5

WP3 : Task 3.1. Develop the Action Programme

Launch of the first pilot call : launched on 10th January 2013

Second call will be launched March 2014: within the ERA NET

PLUS project HERITAGE PLUS

Definition of the Action Programme :

- based upon the SRA (WP2)

- Identify the actions for joint research to be implemented in the

next 3-5 years

P3 RCE leads the Task 3.1

All other beneficiaries and Associated Participants

JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013


JPICH/JHEP PILOT CALL (I):

LAUNCH

- Definition of the MoU : 15 November

- Signature of the MoU : by 13 Countries (i.e. Belgium,

Cyprus, Denmark, France, Ireland, Italy, Lithuania,

Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Slovenia, Spain, United

Kingdom) for a total budget of 3.3 MlEuro

- Definition of the Guidelines for Applicants: by Dec. 2012

- Launch of the call on 10th of January

- Publication of the call on JPICH web site, HERITAGE

PORTAL and Participating Programme Owners web sites


JPICH/JHEP PILOT CALL:

RESEARCH TOPICS

1. Methods, tools and modelling for understanding damage and

decay mechanisms on tangible heritage (including buildings,

sites and landscapes).

2. Materials, technologies and procedures for the conservation

of tangible cultural heritage.

3. Use and re-use of buildings and landscapes, including the

relationship between changes of use and public policy,

including costs and added value.

4. Increasing understanding of cultural values, valuation,

interpretation, ethics and identity.



ROADMAP

Deadline for proposal submission 5th April 2013

National eligibility evaluation by 10 May 2013

International peer review evaluation by 20 June 2013

Scientific Committees’ meeting 4-5 July 2013

Signatories Consensus Meeting 15-20 July 2013

Communication to applicants evaluation by 30 July 2013

National funding bodies to complete administrative

procedures related to successful proposals 1 Aug. - 30 Oct.

Start projects 1 November



Submitted proposals and evaluation

Proposal submitted 89

Proposal not eligible following national

eligibility evaluation all national check arrived : cross

check under definition

International peer review evaluation:

• Each JPICH Country indicated a minimum of 6 experts

and a maximum of 12 (from its own Country or outside), of

which at least 1 expert per topic

• The JPICH List of Peer Expert Reviewers was set up:

113 Experts Top 1 : 29 Top 2: 27

Top 3 : 29 Top 4: 48



Peer review evaluation process

Each proposal is assessed by two evaluators (for proposal with

total budget < 150 Keuro) or three evaluators (for proposal with

total budget > 150 Keuro), chosen by the List of Experts. Based

on these evaluations, a preliminary ranking list is prepared.

The JPI/JHEP Scientific Committee will review the ranking list

based on the evaluations and recommend to the Signatories of

the MoU, a list of proposals to be funded.

The Signatories of the MoU will take the final decision on the

proposals to be funded on a consensus basis, based on the

recommendations of the Scientific Committees. They will discuss

and approve the recommended projects according to the

ranking list and the available budget.


JPICH/JHEP SECOND CALL (I):

PREPARATION

- Expression of interest: 15 December by 14 Countries

including 16 Program owners, i.e. Italy, Belgium,

Cyprus, Denmark, France, Israel, Norway, Poland,

Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Lithuania, The Netherlands,

United Kingdom

- Budget: 5.3 MlEuro

- Call Process: Two step procedure

- Funding schema: Virtual common pot

National funding decisions according

to ranking list


JPICH/JHEP SECOND CALL (II):ERA NET PLUS PROPOSAL

SEVEN FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME

COOPERATION PROGRAMME: ENVIRONMENT

Challenge 6.5. Mobilising environment knowledge for policy,

industry and society

The HERITAGE PLUS Proposal was submitted by 28

February 2013 as an Era Net Plus Project in support to

the JPICH-JHEP Second Call

Requested EC contribution 2.7 Ml Euro

Proposal accepted : tomorrow negotiation will start……


Opening the Call March 2014

Deadline for Pre-Proposals May 2014

Evaluation and selection of Pre-Proposals August 2014

Invitation for Full Proposals September 2014

Deadline for Full Proposals November 2014

Final selection list and funding decisions March 2015

JPICH/JHEP SECOND CALL (III):

PROVISIONAL TIME SCHEDULE


EARLY COMMITMENT BY JPICH PARTICIPANTS

TRUST AMONG MS AND AC

PRIORITIZATION OF RESEARCH TOPICS

SRA IMPLEMENTATION

VISIBILITY TOWARDS STAKEHOLDERS

ADDED VALUE OF THE CALLS


ACTION PROGRAMME

• The AP is the first step in implementing the SRA

• AP will be a document which, starting from the SRA,

gives tools ansd topics for implementation

• Tools will be enabling activities, such as joint calls,

networking, knowledge sharing, mobility of researchers,

infrastructure etc.

• Topics will be derived mainly from the SRA. In addition

input from MS which topics in their own country are most

apt for collaboration because of content and urgency will

be considered.


ACTION PROGRAMME

The following steps were followed for the AP preparation:

Questionnaire to harvest information from JPI Partners

and members of Advisory Board and Scientific Committee

This questionnaire was distributed after consultation of

various partners

The results and other information were merged in a

matrix, which can be a basic format

Also, results of a workshop were harvested


ACTION PROGRAMME

The next step will be a draft version of the AP:

This will consist of a written texst (an explanation of why

and how) and lists of enablers and topics

JPI Participants should use their National Consultation

Panels; NL will lead by example

Advisory Board and Scientific Committee will also be

consulted again.

Following the SRA adoption in March 2013:

AP draft will be ready for JHEP-JPI meeting October 2013

AP (Deliverable 3.1) ready by December 2013


3.2. MAXIMIZING BENEFIT FROM EXISTING EUROPEAN

INITIATIVES FOR HARMONIZATION OF ACTIVITIES WITHIN JPICH

Deliverable structure

Introduction and executive summary

Survey of EU programmes relevant to JHEP/JPICH

Summary description of past and ongoing projects that

are pertinent to the JHEP/JPICH remit

Summary of the features of the relevant projects to be

considered to maximize benefits

Conclusions

19

The ERA and its components

• ERA: research and development activities, programmes and policies in

Europe involving a transnational perspective

– Research

– Framework (infrastructures, etc)

– Standardization

• EU programmes contributing to the ERA

– Seventh Framework Programme

– Art 185 Initiatives (EUREKA/EUROSTARS)

– COST

– Structural Funds (also known as Cohesion Policy or Regional Policy) -

Culture and tourism topic

– Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP)

• Industry

– CEN

– European Construction Technology Platform (born within FP7)

3.2. EXISTING EUROPEAN INITIATIVES


EU programmes contributing to the ERA

• Seventh Framework Programme Framework Programme FP7: PEOPLE, IDEAS (ERC

grants), CAPACITIES (i.e. Research Infrastructures “CHARISMA” & “ARIADNE”),

COOPERATION (Environment & ICT), ACTIONS (E-infrasctructures “DC-NET”)

• Art 185 Initiatives

EUREKA/EUROSTARS

• COST

Until now COST has funded 3 COST Networks concerning coordination of research activities

in the area of cultural heritage. There is also 1 running COST Action in the same area that will

be completed in 2016.

• Structural Funds (also known as Cohesion Policy or Regional Policy)

Culture and tourism topic (Pertinent but not relevant)

• Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP)

CIP has projects concerning the documentation of historic buildings in the framework of the

provision of content to Europeana (“CARARE”, “3D-ICONS”). No information about

conservation/protection



Industry– CEN (European Committee for Standardization)

CEN is an international non-profit association grouping 33 national Standards committees

Among others, it has Technical Committee 346 dealing with Conservation of CulturalHeritage

A substantial number of standards considered as drafts or final versions

– European Construction Technology Platform (born within FP7)

An ETP is an industry-led stakeholder forum charged with defining research priorities in abroad range of technological areas

ECTP addresses Construction

It has FACH, a focus area addressing CH

FACH contributes to CEN/TC 346

Conservation of CH acknowledged as a cohesion factor, but focus on EEB



ERA-NET

• The ERA-NET scheme supports coordination between

national research programmes

– NET- HERITAGE

• ERA-NET PLUS supports joint calls for proposals among

national and regional programmes.

– HERA



WP3 : DELIVERABLES

D3.1. Action Programme: Definition and development of the Action Programme [month 22]

D3.2. Report on benefit maximizing of ongoing activities [month 18]

D3.3. Report on analysis procedure for call launch: Analysis and definition of Call documents (MoU of JPICH participating States, Call text, Guide for Applicants) and report on the execution of each joint call [month 24]


WP3 : DELIVERABLES

D3.4. Report on activities procedure for funding: Analysis of different types of rules and laws in the countries funding the joint calls (financial procedure adopted) [month 24]

D3.5. Report on procedure for project evaluation: Definition of criteria for evaluation (Selection Guidance Notes) [month 24]

D3.6. Report on testing launched calls: Report on activities for call launching (pilot and second calls) and recommendations for future work. Follow up of the call results. [month 36]


WP3 : MILESTONES AND EXPECTED RESULTS


WP3 : TIMESCALE

wp3 implementation of joint programming...

Documents