wwtp peer review memo draft updated by th 5-24-16

61
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³)RUPHU 2ZQHU´ 7KH WZR PDLQ EXLOGLQJV DUH ORFDWHG RQ WKH LQGXVWULDOO\ ]RQHG SRUWLRQ RI WKH SURSHUW\ DQG DQ DSSUR[LPDWHO\ VTXDUH IRRW EXLOGLQJ WKH %HOWUDQ EXLOGLQJ LV ORFDWHG RQ WKH UHVLGHQWLDO SRUWLRQ RI WKH 6LWH 7KH UHPDLQGHU RI WKH 6LWH LQFOXGHV LPSHUYLRXV SDUNLQJ VXUIDFHV VSDFHV VWRUPZDWHU FRQWURO IHDWXUHV ODQGVFDSHG DUHDV DQG MXULVGLFWLRQDO ZHWODQGV &XUUHQWO\ DSSUR[LPDWHO\ DFUHV RI WKH DFUH SURSHUW\ LV LPSHUYLRXV DUHD FRPSULVHG RI EXLOGLQJV SDUNLQJ DUHDV DQG UHODWHG LQIUDVWUXFWXUH

Upload: others

Post on 29-Jan-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

••••••••

••

•••••

20

Boston Post Road

mea

do

w w

alk

su

dbu

ry

526

and

528

Bost

on P

ost

Road

Red

evel

opm

ent

Figu

re 3

Exis

ting

Cond

ition

s Si

te P

lan

0 10

0 20

0 F

eet

Fire

Sta

tion

Beltr

an

Build

ing

Build

ing

2

Build

ing

1Bu

ildin

g5

Build

ing

4Bu

ildin

g3

Former Railroad ROW

Exis

ting

Rete

ntio

n Po

nd

Was

tew

ater

Tr

eatm

ent

Faci

lity

Figu

re 1

Exis

ting

Site

Con

ditio

n

11Fi

gure

2Pr

opos

ed S

ite C

ondi

tion

ATTACHM

ENT 1

Attachment 1

239 Causeway Street, Suite 105

Boston, MA 02114 Ms. Amanda Cavaliere Tata & Howard 67 Forest Street Marlborough, MA 01752

May 24, 2016 File No. 3888.03

Re: Time of Travel Analysis – Sanitary Wastewater System to Raymond Road Well Field 526 & 528 Boston Post Road Sudbury, Massachusetts

Dear Amanda: On behalf of Tata & Howard (Client), Sanborn, Head & Associates, Inc. (Sanborn Head) has prepared this letter to summarize our field exploration activities at the Site and our observations of subsurface conditions to perform a travel time analysis from the proposed sanitary wastewater discharge system to the Sudbury Water District drinking water wells on Raymond Road in Sudbury, Massachusetts. This information, along with historical information provided by Raytheon, the Town of Sudbury, and the Sudbury Water District has been used to create our conceptual hydrogeological model. Existing Conditions and Project Description

The Site is located at 526 & 528 Boston Post Road (Route 20) in southern central Sudbury, Massachusetts and consists of approximately 50 acres of land previously owned and operated by the Raytheon Company (Raytheon) since 1958. Up until January 2016, an active wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) consisting of treated wastewater discharging to three (3) open sand leaching beds has been in operation in the northern portion of the Site, as shown on Figure 1. The beds are approximately 9,800 square feet in area. It is our understanding that the former distribution system rotated the discharged wastewater to the two eastern beds, and the western bed served as a reserve field. The Site is located within the Zone II Public Water Supply Protection Area for the Sudbury Water District Raymond Road water supply well field. The nearest residential properties are located approximately 300 feet northwest of the Site and 1,000 feet southwest and southeast of the Site. The Raymond Road well field is located approximately 0.3 miles southeast of the Site as shown on Figure 1.

The WWTP is currently permitted to treat and discharge 50,000 gallons per day (gpd) under its current groundwater discharge permit. The redevelopment plans include a proposed upgrade of the current WWTP to support an increase of the maximum daily flow to 90,000 gpd. At this time, Sanborn Head is evaluating alternatives to support the increase in daily flow to 90,000 gpd. The proposed alternatives includes construction of subsurface leaching chambers, which is consistent with present-day construction practice. Figure 2 shows the existing sand bed configuration and Figure 3 shows the proposed system upgrade.

May 24, 2016 Page 2 20160524 Summary Memo.docx 3888.03

The following sections discuss subsurface conditions at the Site based on subsurface explorations and groundwater measurements by Sanborn Head and others. The subsurface explorations, groundwater gauging rounds, surficial geology, Custom Soil Resource Report for Middlesex County, Massachusetts1, and the Groundwater Model Documentation Supplement to Prolonged Pumping Test Report for New Well No. 9 Report2 (Sudbury Groundwater Model Supplement) have been used to create a conceptual hydrogeologic model to evaluate modifications to the wastewater discharge system and proposed additional flow. Official Deep Observation Hole Test Pits

Seven (7) deep observation hole test pits (SH-TP-401 through SH-TP-407) were excavated to depths of approximately 10 feet below ground surface on March 9, 2016. In addition, five (5) deep observation hole test pits (SH-TP-408 through SH-TP-412) were excavated to depths of approximately 10 feet below ground surface on May 4, 2016. The test pits were observed and logged by a Sanborn Head Soil Evaluator and were performed under the observation of Mr. Stephen Hallem from the Northeast Regional Office (NERO) of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and Mr. Bill Murphy of the Sudbury Board of the Health (BOH). The test pits were completed within the vicinity of the existing sand bed area and in areas where the proposed system is anticipated to be located. The deep observation hole test pit logs are included as Attachment A. The approximate test pit locations are shown on Figure 4. The estimated seasonal high groundwater elevations at the test pit locations were estimated based on observations made in the field and our ground surface elevations interpolated between the existing ground surface contours shown on the recent topographic plan prepared by Vanasse Hangen Brustlin Inc. (VHB), dated October 2015. Official Soil Percolation Tests and Infiltration Tests

Three (3) percolation tests were completed by a Massachusetts Soil Evaluator from Sanborn Head during our field program on March 9, 2016, and witnessed by Mr. Stephen Hallem of DEP. Three (3) additional percolation tests and four (4) Guelph permeameter/infiltration tests were completed on May 4, 2016 and witnessed by Mr. Stephen Hallem of DEP. Mr. Bill Murphy of the Sudbury BOH witnessed the percolation tests completed at SH-TP-402 and SH-TP-407. Percolation tests were completed at SH-TP-402, SH-TP-404, SH-TP-407, SH-TP-408, SH-TP-411, and SH-TP-412 immediately adjacent to the deep observation hole test pits, at depths of approximately 38 to 102 inches below ground surface (bgs) – as noted on the attached logs. The observed soils generally consist of loamy sands, fine to coarse sands, and fine to medium sands without encountering a more restrictive layer; therefore, the sand layer was used for the percolation tests with the approval of Mr. Hallem. The measured percolation

1 Custom Soil Resource Report for Middlesex County, Massachusetts, United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services, December 2015.

2 Groundwater Model Documentation Supplement to Prolong Pumping Test Report for New Well No. 9, Sudbury, Massachusetts, H2O Engineering Consulting Associates, Inc., February 1993.

May 24, 2016 Page 3 20160524 Summary Memo.docx 3888.03

rates generally ranged from less than 2 minutes per inch to approximately 3.2 minutes per inch. Guelph permeameter/infiltration tests were performed by Sanborn Head at SH-TP-402, SH-TP-408, SH-TP-411, and SH-TP-412. Results from the Guelph permeameter/infiltration tests generally ranged from 1 foot per day to 243 feet per day. The percolation test and Guelph permeameter logs are included in Attachment B. The approximate locations of the field tests are provided on Figure 4. Estimated Depth to Seasonal High Groundwater

In accordance with the Sudbury Zoning Bylaw Article IX, Water Resource Protection Overly District (WRPOD) Section 4260, the maximum groundwater elevation throughout the entire area shall be determined by groundwater gauging from monitoring wells during the months of March, April, or May. Groundwater elevation data was collected by GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. in monitoring wells across the Site on September 13, 2007, September 29 and 30, 2008, April 30 and May 1, 2013, and March 19, 2015. In addition, Sanborn Head measured groundwater levels in a subset of these locations in the vicinity of the wastewater discharge system on November 12, 2015, December 11, 2015, January 7, 2016, and March 9, 2016. Groundwater measurements from gauging rounds are provided in Table 1. As noted in the logs, groundwater was observed in the deep hole observation test pits at: SH-TP-401 through SH-TP-403, SH-TP-407, and SH-TP-410 through SH-TP-412 at depths between 7 and 9 feet bgs (or approximately between El. 147.8 to El. 150.5 feet), which is consistent with the Site-wide groundwater measurements shown in Table 1. Based on the collected groundwater measurements, and in accordance with the DEP approved method for estimating seasonally high groundwater, a Frimpter (1981) analysis was completed by Sanborn Head. As shown on Table 1, the estimated seasonal high groundwater levels range between approximately El. 149.5 feet and El. 152.3 feet. Visual evidence of estimated seasonal high groundwater (i.e., soil mottling/redoximorphic features) was observed in 10 of the 12 official deep observation hole test pit excavations (SH-TP-401 through SH-TP-404, SH-TP-406 through SH-TP-409, and SH-TP-411 and SH-TP-412). Although redoximorphic features were noted on the logs in SH-TP-405 and SH-TP-410, these features were interpreted as an indication of influences from the existing open sand leaching beds. The visual observations of estimated seasonal high groundwater are consistent with the Frimpter-adjusted estimated seasonal high groundwater levels in nearby monitoring wells as shown in Table 1. Subsurface Soil Conditions

In landscaped areas, the surface topsoil is generally 6 to 24 inches thick. Below the topsoil, there is a combination of discontinuous layers of subsoil, fill materials, and buried topsoil on the order of 0 to 8 feet thick. The fill generally consists of sand with varying amounts of silt and trace amounts of gravel. Below the surface materials and fill material, the Site is underlain by natural glacial outwash deposits composed of sands and silts in discontinuous layers and strata. Based on

May 24, 2016 Page 4 20160524 Summary Memo.docx 3888.03

our understanding of subsurface conditions across the overall development from subsurface exploration logs by Sanborn Head and others, these deposits are greater than 25 feet thick. The materials vary from sand with trace to little amounts of silt and trace amounts of gravel to non-plastic silts and sand. At isolated locations near the top of the deposits, very few root particles and organic matter were encountered and are likely an indication of former grade and subsoil that was left in-place. The organic content is estimated to be less than 1 percent by weight. The material is typically very loose to medium dense. Based on Site-wide explorations (approximately 62 explorations of depths ranging between 15 and 108 feet below ground surface), we understand the sand and silty sand deposits are underlain by glacial till at depths greater than 35 feet bgs within the existing leaching field area. Subsurface information for the Raymond Road aquifer was obtained from the Sudbury Groundwater Model Supplement and surficial geology maps provided by the Massachusetts Office of Geographic Information (MassGIS). These reports indicate the Raymond Road aquifer consists of sand and gravel and fine-grained soil deposits approximately 25 to 110 feet thick and underlain by glacial till. Additionally, near surface organic soils can be found along depressions near streams within the Landham Brook watershed. For the purposes of creating a conceptual hydrogeologic model, we have assumed the subsurface conditions at the Raymond Road aquifer consist of loamy sand. Travel Time Analysis

Based on the subsurface conditions observed at the Site and our review of the Sudbury Groundwater Model Supplement for the Sudbury Water District Raymond Road drinking water well field, a conceptual hydrogeologic model was created using Visual MODFLOW to estimate the travel time from the proposed wastewater discharge area to the well field based on the current discharge of 50,000 gpd, and a proposed daily flow of 90,000 gpd. It should be noted that the DEP requires a minimum of 2 years of travel time from leaching fields to the nearest public water supply well in accordance with the DEP Guidelines for the Design, Construction, Operation, and Maintenance of Small Wastewater Treatment Facilities with Land Disposal, dated November 2014. As discussed previously, subsurface conditions at the Site were modeled in accordance with observed conditions during subsurface explorations at the open sand leaching bed area. Subsurface conditions at the Raymond Road aquifer were modeled as loamy sand in accordance with the Sudbury Groundwater Model Supplement and MassGIS. Well construction details and pumping rates were provided by Ms. Rebecca McEnroe, Superintendent at the Sudbury Water District, and were incorporated into the model. The travel time analysis was performed to estimate the length of time required for wastewater discharge from the leach fields to reach the Sudbury Water District Raymond Road drinking water well field. The travel time analysis was completed using the MODPATH package (with particle tracking) for Visual MODFLOW.

May 24, 2016 Page 5 20160524 Summary Memo.docx 3888.03

Based on the results of the hydrogeologic model, the estimated travel time it takes the wastewater discharge to reach the nearest Raymond Road drinking water supply well (Well No. 2) is as much as 20 years for both the existing and proposed design flow conditions for the deep groundwater flow regime. The groundwater discharge takes approximately 6 to 10 years to reach the nearest wellhead in the shallow groundwater flow regime. As indicated by the models, the travel time to the well head is not significantly altered by the increase in daily flow to 90,000 gpd, and significantly exceeds the minimum 2-year travel time required by DEP. The MODFLOW output for the travel time analysis is provided in Attachment C. Very truly yours, SANBORN, HEAD & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Luke Norton, P.E. Project Manager

Stan S. Sadkowski, P.E. Senior Associate/ Vice President

Danielle M. Volpe, P.E. Senior Project Engineer DMV/LDN/SSS/PMP: dmv Encl.

Table 1: Groundwater Elevation Data Figure 1: Locus Plan Figure 2: Existing Conditions Figure 3: Proposed Conceptual Subsurface Bed Figure 4: Exploration Location Plan Attachment A: Test Pit Logs Attachment B: Percolation Test Logs Attachment C: Time Travel Analysis MODFLOW OUTPUT

cc: Mr. Steve Senna & Mr. David Gillespie (BPR Sudbury Development LLC);

\\wesserv1\shdata\3800s\3888.03\Source Files\Summary Memo\20160524 Summary Memo.docx

TABLE

TABL

E 1

Grou

ndw

ater

Ele

vatio

n Su

mm

ary

Tabl

e52

8 Bo

ston

Pos

t Roa

d, S

udbu

ry, M

A

P:\3

800s

\388

8.00

\Wor

k\Gr

ound

wat

er E

lev\

2015

1021

GW

Ele

vatio

ns.x

lsxPa

ge 1

of 1

Sanb

orn,

Hea

d En

gine

erin

g, P

C

Dep

th to

Wat

er

(f

eet)

Grou

ndw

ater

El.

(f

eet N

AVD

88)

Dep

th to

Wat

er

(f

eet)

Grou

ndw

ater

El.

(f

eet N

AVD

88)

Dep

th to

Wat

er

(f

eet)

Grou

ndw

ater

El.

(f

eet N

AVD

88)

Dep

th to

Wat

er

(f

eet)

Grou

ndw

ater

El.

(f

eet N

AVD

88)

Dep

th to

Wat

er

(f

eet)

Grou

ndw

ater

El.

(f

eet N

AVD

88)

W-1

9

-19

158.

689.

8314

8.85

11.4

114

7.27

11.4

314

7.25

10.7

614

7.92

10.0

414

8.64

150.

56W

-2

9 -1

9 16

1.36

10.0

215

1.34

12.9

614

8.40

13.0

814

8.28

12.4

114

8.95

11.6

514

9.71

151.

69W

-3

9 -1

9 15

8.47

8.95

149.

5211

.53

146.

9411

.48

146.

9910

.47

148.

009.

9614

8.51

150.

23W

-4

9 -1

9 15

8.46

9.90

148.

5610

.16

148.

3010

.64

147.

8210

.24

148.

229.

4714

8.99

151.

59W

-5

9 -1

9 16

1.51

8.31

153.

2012

.52

148.

9912

.52

148.

9911

.42

150.

0910

.54

150.

9715

2.28

W-6

9

-19

157.

939.

3114

8.62

11.7

414

6.19

11.5

514

6.38

10.3

914

7.54

10.0

014

7.93

149.

48

Wel

l Scr

een

Inte

rval

(fee

t be

low

top

of

PVC)

Refe

renc

e Po

int

Elev

atio

n(f

eet N

AVD

88)

Mon

itori

ng

Wel

l ID

Frim

pter

Es

timat

ed

Seas

onal

Hig

h Gr

ound

wat

er E

l. (f

eet N

AVD

88)

Dep

th E

leva

tion

1/7/

2016

Dep

th E

leva

tion

3/19

/201

5D

epth

Ele

vatio

n 11

/12/

2015

Dep

th E

leva

tion

12/1

1/20

15D

epth

Ele

vatio

n 3/

9/20

16

Not

es:

1.Gr

ound

wat

er le

vels

mea

sure

d by

San

born

Hea

d pe

rson

nel o

n th

e da

tes i

ndic

ated

. 2.

Ref

eren

ce e

leva

tions

sur

veye

d by

BSC

Gro

up o

n Se

ptem

ber

14, 2

007

and

corr

ecte

d to

NAV

D88

with

a c

orre

ctio

n fa

ctor

of 0

.774

feet

. 3.

Fri

mpt

er e

stim

ated

sea

sona

l hig

h gr

ound

wat

er v

alue

s w

ere

calc

ulat

ed b

y ad

ding

3.3

feet

to th

e N

ovem

ber

12, 2

015

grou

ndw

ater

ele

vatio

n da

ta.

FIGURES

1/2 MILE

RADIUS

1 MILE

RADIUS

PWS NO. 2

PWS NO. 9

PWS NO. 7 PWS NO. 6

PWS NO. 4

File:P:\3800s\3888.03\Graphics Files\CAD\Time of Travel Analysis May16\TimeofTravel.dwg Plot Date: 5-19-16 c 2016 SANBORN, HEAD & ASSOCIATES, INC.

SITE

SCALE: 1" = 1,700'

Project No:Reviewed By:Designed By:

Drawn By:

Date:

Time of Travel Analysis528 Boston Post Road

Locus Plan

Sudbury, Massachusetts

D.DombrowskyD.VolpeL.Norton

May 20163888.03

Figure 1

SAN NBOR HEAD

NOTES:Base map was taken from the "Office ofGeographic and EnvironmentalInformation (MassGIS), Commonwealthof Massachusetts InformationTechnology Division"7.5 minute USGS Quadrangle Maps:Sudbury, Massachusetts, REV: 1987

Legend:

Community and Non-Community Public Water Supply Well (from MassGIS online database records)

NO

TES:

1.TH

E B

AS

E M

AP

WA

S T

AK

EN

FR

OM

AN

ELE

CTR

ON

IC P

LAN

EN

TITL

ED

,"E

XIS

TIN

G C

ON

DIT

ION

S S

ITE

PLA

N",

PR

EP

AR

ED

BY

VA

NA

SS

E H

AN

GE

NB

RU

STL

IN, I

NC

. (VH

B) O

F W

ATE

RTO

WN

, MA

, REC

EIV

ED

MAY

23,

201

6 W

ITH

AN

OR

IGIN

AL

SC

ALE

OF

1" =

100

'.

DE

SC

RIP

TIO

ND

ATE

BY

NO

.

c2016SANBORN,HEAD&ASSOCIATES,INC.

SAN

NBOR

HEAD

DE

SIG

NE

D B

Y:

REV

IEW

ED B

Y:

PR

OJE

CT

MG

R:

DR

AW

N B

Y:

PIC

:

DAT

E:

PR

OJE

CT

NU

MB

ER

:

SH

EE

T N

UM

BE

R:

528

BOST

ON

PO

ST R

OAD

TIM

E O

F TR

AV

EL A

NAL

YSIS

EXIS

TIN

G C

ON

DIT

ION

S PL

ANM

AY

2016

C.G

RE

ENL.

NO

RTO

NS

.SA

DK

OW

SK

IL.

NO

RTO

NS

.SA

DK

OW

SK

I

3888

.03

2

SU

DB

UR

Y, M

AS

SA

CH

US

ETT

S

IMAGES:P:\3800s\3888.03\GraphicsFiles\CAD\XRefs\Figure1-ExistingConditions.tiffP:\3800s\3888.03\GraphicsFiles\CAD\XRefs\Figure2.tiffP:\3800s\3888.03\GraphicsFiles\CAD\XRefs\Figure3.tif\\WESSERV1\Data\CADLibrary\USGIS-MAPS\MASS\SUDBURY\q205898.sid\\WESSERV1\Data\CADLibrary\USGIS-MAPS\MASS\SUDBURY\q205902.sid\\WESSERV1\Data\CADLibrary\USGIS-MAPS\MASS\SUDBURY\q209898.sid\\WESSERV1\Data\CADLibrary\USGIS-MAPS\MASS\SUDBURY\q209902.sid

XREFS:LAYOUT:FIG2FILE:P:\3800s\3888.03\GraphicsFiles\CAD\TimeofTravelAnalysisMay16\TimeofTravel.dwg

PLOTDATE:5-23-165:10PMUSER:cgreen

GR

AP

HIC

AL

SC

ALE

200'

100'

0'50

'10

0'

NO

TES:

1.TH

E B

AS

E M

AP

WA

S T

AK

EN

FR

OM

AN

ELE

CTR

ON

IC P

LAN

EN

TITL

ED

,"O

PTI

ON

NO

. 2 P

RO

PO

SE

D C

ON

CE

PTU

AL

SU

BS

UR

FAC

E B

ED

", P

RE

PA

RE

DB

Y V

AN

AS

SE

HA

NG

EN

BR

US

TLIN

, IN

C. (

VH

B) O

F W

ATE

RTO

WN

, MA

,R

EC

EIV

ED

MAY

23,

201

6 W

ITH

AN

OR

IGIN

AL

SC

ALE

OF

1" =

100

'.

DE

SC

RIP

TIO

ND

ATE

BY

NO

.

c2016SANBORN,HEAD&ASSOCIATES,INC.

SAN

NBOR

HEAD

DE

SIG

NE

D B

Y:

REV

IEW

ED B

Y:

PR

OJE

CT

MG

R:

DR

AW

N B

Y:

PIC

:

DAT

E:

PR

OJE

CT

NU

MB

ER

:

SH

EE

T N

UM

BE

R:

528

BOST

ON

PO

ST R

OAD

TIM

E O

F TR

AV

EL A

NAL

YSIS

OPT

ION

NO

. 2 P

RO

PO

SED

CO

NC

EPTU

AL S

UBS

UR

FAC

E BE

DM

AY

2016

C.G

REE

NL.

NO

RTO

NS

.SA

DK

OW

SK

IL.

NO

RTO

NS

.SA

DK

OW

SK

I

3888

.03

4

SU

DB

UR

Y, M

AS

SA

CH

US

ETT

S

IMAGES:P:\3800s\3888.03\GraphicsFiles\CAD\XRefs\Figure1-ExistingConditions.tiffP:\3800s\3888.03\GraphicsFiles\CAD\XRefs\Figure2.tiffP:\3800s\3888.03\GraphicsFiles\CAD\XRefs\Figure3.tif\\WESSERV1\Data\CADLibrary\USGIS-MAPS\MASS\SUDBURY\q205898.sid\\WESSERV1\Data\CADLibrary\USGIS-MAPS\MASS\SUDBURY\q205902.sid\\WESSERV1\Data\CADLibrary\USGIS-MAPS\MASS\SUDBURY\q209898.sid\\WESSERV1\Data\CADLibrary\USGIS-MAPS\MASS\SUDBURY\q209902.sid

XREFS:LAYOUT:FIG4FILE:P:\3800s\3888.03\GraphicsFiles\CAD\TimeofTravelAnalysisMay16\TimeofTravel.dwg

PLOTDATE:5-23-165:10PMUSER:cgreen

GR

AP

HIC

AL

SC

ALE

200'

100'

0'50

'10

0'

3P

RO

PO

SE

D C

ON

CE

PTU

AL

SU

BS

UR

FAC

E B

ED

1. T

HE

BA

SE

MA

P W

AS

TA

KE

N F

RO

M A

N E

LEC

TRO

NIC

PLA

N E

NTI

TLE

D,

"PR

OP

OS

ED

CO

NC

EP

TUA

L S

UB

SU

RFA

CE

BE

D,"

PR

EP

AR

ED

BY

VA

NA

SS

E

HA

NG

EN

BR

US

TLIN

, IN

C. (

VH

B) O

F W

ATE

RTO

WN

, MA

, RE

CE

IVE

D M

AY

23,

20

16 W

ITH

AN

OR

IGIN

AL

SC

ALE

OF

1"=1

00'.

GZ-

201

W-4

W-1

W-6

GZ-

10S

GZ-

10D

W-2

W-5

W-3

SH

-9

SH

-10

SH

-305

SH

-306

SH

-304

SH

-303

SH

-302

SH

-301

SH

-TP

-407

SH

-TP

-406

SH

-TP

-401

SH

-TP

-402

SH

-TP

-403

SH

-TP

-404

SH

-TP

-405

SH

-TP

-409

SH

-TP

-411

SH

-TP

-412

SH

-TP

-410

SH

-TP

-408

NO

TES:

1.TH

E BA

SE

MAP

WAS

DR

AWN

FR

OM

A P

LAN

EN

TITL

ED, "

EXIS

TIN

G C

ON

DIT

ION

S PL

ANO

F LA

ND

", P

RE

PAR

ED

BY

VAN

ASSE

HAN

GE

N B

RU

STLI

N, I

NC

. (VH

B) O

FW

ATE

RTO

WN

, MA

, DAT

ED

OC

TOBE

R 1

2, 2

015

WIT

H A

N O

RIG

INA

L S

CA

LE O

F 1"

= 4

0'.

2.E

XP

LOR

ATI

ON

S D

ES

IGN

ATE

D S

H-1

01(W

) TH

RO

UG

H S

H-1

07 A

ND

SH

-301

TH

RO

UG

HSH

- W

ERE

ADVA

NC

ED B

Y C

RAW

FOR

D D

RIL

LIN

G S

ERVI

CES

, LLC

(CD

S) O

FW

ES

TMIN

STE

R, M

A A

ND

OB

SE

RV

ED

BY

SA

NB

OR

N H

EA

D B

ETW

EE

N N

OV

EM

BE

R 1

3A

ND

17,

201

5.

3.TE

ST

PIT

S D

ES

IGN

ATE

D S

H-T

P-4

01 T

HR

OU

GH

SH

-TP

-412

WE

RE

AD

VA

NC

ED

BY

GEN

ESIS

UTI

LITI

ES C

OR

POR

ATI

ON

OF

QU

INC

Y, M

A A

ND

OBS

ERVE

D B

Y SA

NBO

RN

HE

AD

ON

MAR

CH

9, 2

016.

4.E

XP

LOR

ATI

ON

DE

SIG

NA

TED

SH

-9 A

ND

SH

-10

WE

RE

AD

VA

NC

ED

BY

GE

OS

EA

RC

HA

ND

OB

SE

RV

ED

BY

SA

NB

OR

N H

EA

D O

N M

AY

29,

201

5.

5.A

PP

RO

XIM

ATE

LO

CA

TIO

NS

OF

EX

PLO

RA

TIO

NS

BY

SA

NB

OR

N H

EA

D A

RE

BA

SE

D O

NTA

PE

D M

EA

SU

RE

ME

NTS

MA

DE

IN T

HE

FIE

LD R

ELA

TIV

E T

O P

RO

MIN

EN

T S

ITE

FEA

TUR

ES

. TH

IS D

ATA

SH

OU

LD B

E C

ON

SID

ER

ED

AC

CU

RA

TE O

NLY

TO

TH

ED

EG

RE

E IM

PLI

ED

BY

TH

E M

ETH

OD

US

ED

.

6.A

PP

RO

XIM

ATE

LO

CA

TIO

NS

OF

EX

PLO

RA

TIO

NS

BY

OTH

ER

S A

RE

BA

SE

D O

N P

LAN

SB

Y O

THE

RS

. TH

IS D

ATA

SH

OU

LD B

E C

ON

SID

ER

ED

AC

CU

RA

TE O

NLY

TO

TH

ED

EG

RE

E IM

PLI

ED

BY

TH

E M

ETH

OD

US

ED

.

LEG

EN

D:

AP

PR

OX

IMA

TE L

OC

ATI

ON

AN

D D

ES

IGN

ATI

ON

OF

TES

T B

OR

ING

BY

SA

NB

OR

N H

EA

D (N

OV

EM

BE

R 2

015)

AP

PR

OX

IMA

TE L

OC

ATI

ON

AN

D D

ES

IGN

ATI

ON

OF

TES

T P

IT B

Y S

AN

BO

RN

HE

AD

(MA

RC

H 2

016)

AP

PR

OX

IMA

TE L

OC

ATI

ON

AN

D D

ES

IGN

ATI

ON

OF

SH

ALL

OW

TE

ST

BO

RIN

GB

Y S

AN

BO

RN

HE

AD

(MA

Y 2

015)

APP

RO

XIM

ATE

LO

CAT

ION

AN

D D

ESI

GN

ATIO

N O

F M

ON

ITO

RIN

G W

ELL

BYO

THE

RS

DE

SC

RIP

TIO

ND

ATE

BY

NO

.

c2016SANBORN,HEAD&ASSOCIATES,INC.

SAN

NBOR

HEAD

DE

SIG

NE

D B

Y:

REV

IEW

ED B

Y:

PR

OJE

CT

MG

R:

DR

AW

N B

Y:

PIC

:

DAT

E:

PR

OJE

CT

NU

MB

ER

:

SH

EE

T N

UM

BE

R:

528

BOST

ON

PO

ST R

OAD

GE

OTE

CH

NIC

AL

CO

NS

ULT

ING

SE

RV

ICE

S

EXP

LOR

ATI

ON

LO

CAT

ION

PLA

NM

AY 2

016

C.G

RE

ENL.

NO

RTO

NS

.SA

DK

OW

SK

IL.

NO

RTO

N

3888

.03

1

SU

DB

UR

Y, M

AS

SA

CH

US

ETT

S

IMAGES: XREFS:P:\3800s\3888.00\GraphicsFiles\CAD\XRefs\X-13125.00-EXIST.dwgP:\3800s\3888.02\GraphicsFiles\CAD\XRefs\X-EXPLORATIONS.dwg LAYOUT:FIG1

FILE:P:\3800s\3888.03\GraphicsFiles\CAD\ELP-MAY16\ELP.dwg

PLOTDATE:5-17-168:28AMUSER:cgreen

GR

AP

HIC

AL

SC

ALE

160'

80'

0'40

'80

'

GZ-

4

SH

-10

SH

-301

SH

-TP

-401

Per

c: <

2 m

in/in

ch

Gue

lph:

4.7

ft/d

ay

ES

HG

W: E

L 14

9.2

ft

ES

HG

W:

EL

150.

5 ft

ES

HG

W:

EL

150.

5 ft

Per

c: <

2 m

in/in

ch

ES

HG

W: E

L 15

2.5

ftE

SH

GW

: N

ot O

bser

ved

ES

HG

W:

EL

152.

1 ft

Per

c: 2

.3 m

in/in

ch

ES

HG

W: E

L 15

1.5

ft

Per

c: 3

.3 m

in/in

ch

Gue

lph:

9.8

ft/d

ay

ES

HG

W: E

L 15

3.0

ft

ES

HG

W:

EL

152.

4 ft

ES

HG

W:

Not

Obs

erve

d

Per

c: <

2 m

in/in

ch

Gue

lph:

1.0

ft/d

ay

ES

HG

W: E

L 15

0.5

ft

Per

c: <

2 m

in/in

ch

Gue

lph:

243

ft/d

ay

ES

HG

W: E

L 15

3.5

ftE

SH

GW

: E

L 15

4.0

ft

ES

HG

W:

EL

153.

0 ft

ES

HG

W:

El 1

56.0

ft

ES

HG

W:

EL

154.

5 ft

ES

HG

W: E

L 15

2.0

ft

ES

HG

W:

EL

152.

0 ft

ES

HG

W:

EL

150.

23 ft

ES

HG

W:

EL

149.

48 ft

ES

HG

W:

EL

150.

56 ft

ES

HG

W:

EL

151.

59 ftES

HG

W:

EL

151.

69 ft

ES

HG

W:

EL

152.

28 ft

ES

HG

W: E

STI

MA

TED

SE

AS

ON

AL

HIG

H G

RO

UN

DW

ATE

R (D

ETE

RM

INE

D B

Y F

RIM

PTE

R-

AD

JUS

TED

GR

OU

ND

WA

TER

ME

AS

UR

EM

EN

TS IN

WE

LLS

, AN

D V

ISU

AL

RE

DO

XIM

OR

PH

IC F

EA

TUR

ES

IN T

ES

T P

ITS

)

GU

ELP

H: S

ATU

RA

TED

INFI

LTR

ATI

ON

RA

TE C

OM

PLE

TED

US

ING

A G

UE

LPH

P

ER

ME

AM

ETE

R IN

AC

CO

RD

AN

CE

WIT

H A

STM

D 1

556

AN

D T

ITLE

V A

PP

EN

DIX

B

PE

RC

: PE

RC

OLA

TIO

N R

ATE

CO

MP

LETE

D IN

AC

CO

RD

AN

CE

WIT

H T

ITLE

V

App

roxi

mat

e lo

catio

n of

was

te w

ater

tre

atm

ent p

lant

Bed

No.

1

Bed

No.

2B

ed N

o. 3

5

TIM

E O

F TR

AV

EL

AN

ALY

SIS

4

ATTACHMENT A

TEST PIT LOGS

Test

PitL

ogs

Test

PitL

ogs

Test

PitL

ogs

Test

PitL

ogs

Test

PitL

ogs

Test

PitL

ogs

Test

PitL

ogs

Test

PitL

ogs

Test

PitL

ogs

Test

PitL

ogs

Test

PitL

ogs

Test

PitL

ogs

ATTACHMENT B

PERCOLATION TEST LOGS

Commonwealth of MassachusettsCity/Town of Sudbury Percolation Test Form 12

Percolation test results must be submitted with the Soil Suitability Assessment for On-site Sewage Disposal. DEP has provided this form for use by local Boards of Health. Other forms may be used, but the information must be substantially the same as that provided here. Before using this form, check with the local Board of Health to determine the form they use.

Important: When filling out forms on the computer, use only the tab key to move your cursor - do not use the return key.

A. Site Information

Owner Name

528 Boston Post RoadStreet Address or Lot #

SudburyCity/Town

MAState

01776Zip Code

Contact Person (if different from Owner) Telephone Number

B. Test Results3/9/2016Date Time Date Time

Observation Hole # SH-TP-402

Depth of Perc Top of Hole 40"Bottom of Hole 58"

Start Pre-Soak 8:26 (00:00)

End Pre-Soak 8:41 (15:00)

Time at 12” 8:41 (15:00)

Time at 9” 8:42 (16:47)

Time at 6” 8:45 (19:00)

Time (9”-6”) 02:13

Rate (Min./Inch) <2 min/in

Test Passed: Test Failed:

Test Passed: Test Failed:

Luke Norton (Soil Evaluator No. 13281) and Nell Briggs (Soil Evaluator No. 13938)Test Performed By:

Bill Murphy (Sudbury BOH) and Stephen Hallem (DEP)Board of Health Witness

Comments:

22 gal. used in pre-soak

t5form12.doc• 08/15 Perc Test • Page 1 of 1

Commonwealth of MassachusettsCity/Town of Sudbury Percolation Test Form 12

Percolation test results must be submitted with the Soil Suitability Assessment for On-site Sewage Disposal. DEP has provided this form for use by local Boards of Health. Other forms may be used, but the information must be substantially the same as that provided here. Before using this form, check with the local Board of Health to determine the form they use.

Important: When filling out forms on the computer, use only the tab key to move your cursor - do not use the return key.

A. Site Information

Owner Name

528 Boston Post RoadStreet Address or Lot #

SudburyCity/Town

MAState

01776Zip Code

Contact Person (if different from Owner) Telephone Number

B. Test Results3/9/2016Date Time Date Time

Observation Hole # SH-TP-404

Depth of Perc Top of Hole 66"Bottom of Hole 84"

Start Pre-Soak 13:30 (00:00)

End Pre-Soak 13:38 (07:45)

Time at 12” 13:38 (07:47)

Time at 9” 13:40 (9:40)

Time at 6” 13:40 (10:02)

Time (9”-6”) 0:22

Rate (Min./Inch) <2 min/in

Test Passed: Test Failed:

Test Passed: Test Failed:

Luke Norton (Soil Evaluator No. 13281) and Nell Briggs (Soil Evaluator No. 13938)Test Performed By:

Stephen Hallem (DEP)Board of Health Witness

Comments:

24 gal. used in pre-soak;

t5form12.doc• 08/15 Perc Test • Page 1 of 1

Commonwealth of MassachusettsCity/Town of Sudbury Percolation Test Form 12

Percolation test results must be submitted with the Soil Suitability Assessment for On-site Sewage Disposal. DEP has provided this form for use by local Boards of Health. Other forms may be used, but the information must be substantially the same as that provided here. Before using this form, check with the local Board of Health to determine the form they use.

Important: When filling out forms on the computer, use only the tab key to move your cursor - do not use the return key.

A. Site Information

Owner Name

528 Boston Post RoadStreet Address or Lot #

SudburyCity/Town

MAState

01776Zip Code

Contact Person (if different from Owner) Telephone Number

B. Test Results3/9/2016Date Time Date Time

Observation Hole # SH-TP-407

Depth of Perc Top of Hole 84"Bottom of Hole 102"

Start Pre-Soak 11:26 (00:00)

End Pre-Soak 11:41 (15:00)

Time at 12” 11:41 (15:00)

Time at 9” 11:47 (20:52)

Time at 6” 11:54 (27:45)

Time (9”-6”) 6:53

Rate (Min./Inch) 2.3 min/in

Test Passed: Test Failed:

Test Passed: Test Failed:

Luke Norton (Soil Evaluator No. 13281) and Nell Briggs (Soil Evaluator No. 13938)Test Performed By:

Bill Murphy (Sudbury BOH) and Stephen Hallem (DEP)Board of Health Witness

Comments:

8 gal. used in pre-soak

t5form12.doc• 08/15 Perc Test • Page 1 of 1

Commonwealth of MassachusettsCity/Town of Sudbury Percolation Test Form 12

Percolation test results must be submitted with the Soil Suitability Assessment for On-site Sewage Disposal. DEP has provided this form for use by local Boards of Health. Other forms may be used, but the information must be substantially the same as that provided here. Before using this form, check with the local Board of Health to determine the form they use.

Important: When filling out forms on the computer, use only the tab key to move your cursor - do not use the return key.

A. Site Information

Owner Name

528 Boston Post RoadStreet Address or Lot #

SudburyCity/Town

MAState

01776Zip Code

Contact Person (if different from Owner) Telephone Number

B. Test Results5/12/2016Date Time Date Time

Observation Hole # SH-TP-408

Depth of Perc Top of Hole 74"Bottom of Hole 92"

Start Pre-Soak (00:00)

End Pre-Soak (15:00)

Time at 12” (15:00)

Time at 9” (24:16)

Time at 6” (34:15)

Time (9”-6”) (9:59)

Rate (Min./Inch) 3.3 min/in

Test Passed: Test Failed:

Test Passed: Test Failed:

Luke Norton (Soil Evaluator No. 13281) and Eleanor Briggs (Soil Evaluator No. 13938)Test Performed By:

Stephen Hallen (DEP)Board of Health Witness

Comments:

9.5 gal. used in pre-soak

t5form12.doc• 08/15 Perc Test • Page 1 of 1

Commonwealth of MassachusettsCity/Town of Sudbury Percolation Test Form 12

Percolation test results must be submitted with the Soil Suitability Assessment for On-site Sewage Disposal. DEP has provided this form for use by local Boards of Health. Other forms may be used, but the information must be substantially the same as that provided here. Before using this form, check with the local Board of Health to determine the form they use.

Important: When filling out forms on the computer, use only the tab key to move your cursor - do not use the return key.

A. Site Information

Owner Name

528 Boston Post RoadStreet Address or Lot #

SudburyCity/Town

MAState

01776Zip Code

Contact Person (if different from Owner) Telephone Number

B. Test Results5/12/2016Date Time Date Time

Observation Hole # SH-TP-411

Depth of Perc Top of Hole 41"Bottom of Hole 59"

Start Pre-Soak (00:00)

End Pre-Soak (10:53)

Time at 12”

Time at 9”

Time at 6”

Time (9”-6”)

Rate (Min./Inch) <2 min/in

Test Passed: Test Failed:

Test Passed: Test Failed:

Luke Norton (Soil Evaluator No. 13281) and Nell Briggs (Soil Evaluator No. 13938)Test Performed By:

Stephen Hallem (DEP)Board of Health Witness

Comments:

24 gal. used in pre-soak

t5form12.doc• 08/15 Perc Test • Page 1 of 1

Commonwealth of MassachusettsCity/Town of Sudbury Percolation Test Form 12

Percolation test results must be submitted with the Soil Suitability Assessment for On-site Sewage Disposal. DEP has provided this form for use by local Boards of Health. Other forms may be used, but the information must be substantially the same as that provided here. Before using this form, check with the local Board of Health to determine the form they use.

Important: When filling out forms on the computer, use only the tab key to move your cursor - do not use the return key.

A. Site Information

Owner Name

528 Boston Post RoadStreet Address or Lot #

SudburyCity/Town

MAState

01776Zip Code

Contact Person (if different from Owner) Telephone Number

B. Test Results5/12/2016Date Time Date Time

Observation Hole # SH-TP-412

Depth of Perc Top of Hole 28"Bottom of Hole 46"

Start Pre-Soak (00:00)

End Pre-Soak (08:25)

Time at 12”

Time at 9”

Time at 6”

Time (9”-6”)

Rate (Min./Inch) <2 min/in

Test Passed: Test Failed:

Test Passed: Test Failed:

Luke Norton (Soil Evaluator No. 13281) and Nell Briggs (Soil Evaluator No. 13938)Test Performed By:

Stephen Hallem (DEP)Board of Health Witness

Comments:

24 gal. used in pre-soak

t5form12.doc• 08/15 Perc Test • Page 1 of 1

ATTACHMENT C

TIME TRAVEL ANALYSIS MODFLOW OUTPUT

Attachment C.1 Time Travel Analysis Existing Conditions

528 Boston Post Road Sudbury, MA

Legend1 year time increment

Approximate Site Boundary

Notes:Existing conditions: 10,000 gallons per day applied to Beds No.2 and No.3 with Bed 1 on Reserve

N

Attachment C.2 Time Travel Analysis Proposed Conditions

528 Boston Post Road Sudbury, MA

Legend

1 year time increment

Notes:Proposed conditions: 90,000 gallons per day applied to New Bed (22,500 square feet) Bed No.2 on Reserve

Approximate Site Boundary

N

ATTACHM

ENT 2

Attachment 2