x-ray tomography at...
TRANSCRIPT
Tomography timeline
• 2013: Sayab Muhammad joins GTK, a structural geologist interested abouttomography
• 2015: Sayab, et al., High-resolution X-raycomputed microtomography: A holisticapproach to metamorphic fabric analyses. Geology 43 (1): 55-58 (2015)
• 2015: Funding for a XCT device grantedby Academy of Finland
@ GTK
2013
2015
6/20177/2017 9/2017 3/2018 5/2018
Tomography timeline @ GTK
2013
2015
• 6/2017: Device installation
• 7/2017: First significant sample: Lieksa iron meteorite
• 9/2017: FinTomo network founded
• 9/2017: Launch meet
• 3/2018: Deben stage finally working
• 5/2018: First FinTomo seminar
6/20177/2017 9/2017 3/2018 5/2018
GE phoenix v|tome|x s 240
• Manufactured in Wunstorf, Germany
• 240 kV / 320 W microfocustube
• Most powerful in Finland!
• Resolution up to 5 μm
• Allows imaging of complete drill coresamples
• 180 kV / 15 W nanofocus tube
• Resolution up to 900 nm
• 400×400 mm2 4 Mpix detector
• Max. sample size 26×41 cm2 / 10 kg
• FOV width = 2000 pix
Deben sample stage
• Compression and tension
• Force up to 5 kN
• Displacement up to 10 mm
• Cooling and heating
• Peltier elements at bothends of the sample
• Elements controlledindependently
• -20 to ”160” °C
• Currently up to 100 °C
FEI PerGeos
• Powerful tool for image processing
• Noise filtering
• Segmentation
• Watershed reducesoperator-dependency
• Recipes increaseefficiency
• Analysis
• Grain orientation
• Pore size distribution
• Visualization
How do we fit in?
• Geographically
• Not the first device in thecapital area, but plenty of users here as well
How do we fit in?
• Geographically
• Not the first device in thecapital area, but plenty of users here as well
• Power-wise
• A niche of our own
SkyScans Xradia Micro Xradia Nano GTK / GE
kV W
100
50
150
200
250
100
200
300
400
500
1200
How do we fit in?
• Geographically
• Not the first device in thecapital area, but plenty of users here as well
• Power-wise
• A niche of our own
• Sample size-wise
• A niche of our own
• We can do something the otherscannot, so no need to compete
• All the more reason to collaborate
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
SkyScans Xradia Micro Xradia nano GTK / GE
Current status of the lab
• 9 months of operational use
• ~ 180 working days
• 480 hours of scan time
• 364 h on MF tube +116 h on NF tube
• 177 unique samples
• 21 on NF tube, 156 on MF tube
• Users from 16 different institutions
• Espoo, Helsinki, Kuopio, Oulu, Tampere
• EST, FIN, GER, UK, USA
Past project: Lieksa iron meteorite• First iron meteorite found in Finland
• Max. thickness 6,6 cm, mostly Fe-Ni compound
• 220 kV / 48 W: Inner structure along with volumetric fractions of ironand silicate phases – unattainable by any other method
• 3D image was used to print a 3D copy for the finder
Past and future project: Mineral exploration
workflow
Possible future project: Bentonite in high
temperature
• Structural studies of bentonite have been mostly donein room temperature
• Temperature in nuclear waste repository is significantlyhigher
• Need for structural studies that include hightemperature
• Collaborative EU-project with JYU
• First collaborative FinTomo – project!
• Equipment and operator work from GTK
• Bentonite imaging expertise and sample holdersfrom JYU
FinTomo current status
• Mailing list has 65 (25 present today) recipients from 20 (13) institutions, including every academic XCT device
• ABB, Aalto, Ajat, EP-TeQ, FMI, GTK, HY, JYU, Kavokerr, Nokia, OY, Planmeca, Stora Enso, TTU, TUT, TYKS, UCSF, UEF, UTU, VTT (+ MIKES)
• ”FinTomo board” currently has 11 members from 7 institutions
• One project proposal underway, ideas exist for more
• Website is up but requires work, waiting for domain to open
• A new logo would be nice…
?
Thank you!