yorkland lcc 2010-r1
DESCRIPTION
Presentation on Life cycle costs for Intelligent BuildingsTRANSCRIPT
6/4/2010 1
Lowering Life cycle Costs and Using CABA Lowering Life cycle Costs and Using CABA Intelligent Building Quotient for OPA Incentives Intelligent Building Quotient for OPA Incentives
and Demand Responseand Demand ResponseDavid Katz, MBA, BADavid Katz, MBA, BA
Sustainable Resources Management Inc. Sustainable Resources Management Inc. Tel: 416 Tel: 416 -- 493 493 -- 92329232Fax: 416 Fax: 416 -- 493493-- 53665366
Email: Email: [email protected]@sustainable.on.caBuilding Intelligence Quotient ConsortiumBuilding Intelligence Quotient Consortium
Email: dkatz@buildingEmail: [email protected]
Building Automation and Security IntegrationYorkland Controls - Honeywell
June 2, 2010, Richmond HillJune 2, 2010, Richmond Hill
6/4/2010 2
•• Introduce CABA and IIBC that developed the BiQ and the LCC Introduce CABA and IIBC that developed the BiQ and the LCC programs for GREEN and Intelligent Buildingsprograms for GREEN and Intelligent Buildings
•• Examples of applying LCC to Green Building optionsExamples of applying LCC to Green Building options
•• Other life cycle environmental attributes covered under Life Other life cycle environmental attributes covered under Life cycle analysiscycle analysis
•• Example of LCC for intelligent building choicesExample of LCC for intelligent building choices
•• Funding for the Energy and Demand Response optionsFunding for the Energy and Demand Response options
•• Associations and agencies that have programs to help pay for Associations and agencies that have programs to help pay for the investments especially if they provide life cycle benefits.the investments especially if they provide life cycle benefits.
•• Questions now and after on Panel DiscussionQuestions now and after on Panel Discussion
AGENDAAGENDA
6/4/2010 3
Intelligent Buildings
Why do we build dumb buildings?
6/4/2010 4
CABA Vision
“The knowledge-based forum forindustry leaders who advance the use of technology and integrated systems in the global home and building industry.”
6/4/2010 5
Pneumatic Transmission
Electric Controls
Electronic Controls
Mini Computers
Personal Computers
Direct Digital Controls
BACnet/Lon Revolution
Internet/Intranet
Growing Convergence of BAS and IT
Wireless Interfaces and Email Alarms
IT Standardizing Information Presentation Models
Evolution of Systems that m
ay Integrate all Building Services on Standard IT Infrastructure
Copyright Frost & Sullivan
Technological Evolution of BUILDING AUTOMATION SYSTEMS
6/4/2010 6Copyright ® 2007 The Fourth Utility, LLC All Rights Reserved. Intelligent Buildings Confidential
What “Information” is in a Building? Building automation systems
Energy managementSecurityDigital signageFacility mgmt. and visitor mgmt.POSConsumablesParkingTenant technologyProperty mgmt. and back office…more
Copyright ® 2006 The Fourth Utility, LLC
6/4/2010 7
TECHNOLOGY ROADMAP FOR INTELLIGENT BUILDINGS
www.caba.org/trm
FREE
6/4/2010 8
Buildings39%
Industry
33%
Transportation28%
Buildings use 71%of electricity
21%
18%18%
Residential
Heating 32%
Other 4%
WaterHeat 13%
Computers 1%
Cooling 10%
Refrigeration 9%
Lights
12%
Electronics 5%
Wash 5% Cooking 5%
Why Buildings: Huge Opportunities
Source: 2004 Buildings Energy Databook with SEDS distributed to all end-uses
Commercial
Other 10%
Lights 28%
Heating16%Cooling
13%Water Heat 7%
Ventilation 7%
Cooking 2%Computers 3%
Office Equip 7%
Refrigeration 4%
6/4/2010 9
HVAC
24/7 Monitor
Video surveillance
Elevator
Lighting
Fire
Access
Energy
Reducing Building Cost
Services and Technologies
Copyright ® 2007 The Fourth Utility, LLC All Rights Reserved.
6/4/2010 10
High Speed Internet / Wireless
Voice Communications
Facilities Management
Interactive media
Visitor management
Audio – Video Conf
Ambient Music / TV
Better Tenant and Common Area Experience
Digital signage
Serv
ices
and
Tec
hnol
ogie
s
Copyright ® 2007 The Fourth Utility, LLC All Rights Reserved.
6/4/2010 11
High Speed Internet / Wireless
IP Telephony
Future Applications
Interactive media
Visitor management
Audio – Video Conf
Ambient Music / TV
Smarter Building / Property
Digital signage
HVAC
24/7 Monitor
Video surveillance
Elevator
Lighting
Fire
Access
Energy
Copyright ® 2007 The Fourth Utility, LLC All Rights Reserved.
6/4/2010 12
Technology Usage/Purchase Plans
•• Smart Telephony• Telepresence• Active RFID• Smart Landscaping• Intelligent Bathrooms• Audio/Video Support• Combined Heat and Power/Alternative Energy
• Automated Parking• Green Buildings and LEED Certification
• Digital Signage
30%15%9%9%9%39%39%
12%48%
21%
64%64%64%55%52%48%45%
45%42%
39%
Technology Currently Use Might Purchase
6/4/2010 13
YYoouurr IInnffoorrmmaattiioonn SSoouurrccee ffoorr HHoommee && BBuuiillddiinngg AAuuttoommaattiioonn
1173 Cyrville Road, Suite 210 Ottawa, ON K1J 7S6
613.686.1814 888.798.CABA (2222) 613.744.7833
www.caba.org
www.caba.org/samples
6/4/2010 14
Intelligent and Green Building Intelligent and Green Building InvestmentsInvestments
Typical problems that LCC can resolve:Typical problems that LCC can resolve:Having lower life cycle costs provides the Having lower life cycle costs provides the incentive to overcome the lower first cost or incentive to overcome the lower first cost or budgetary restrictions.budgetary restrictions.Building valuations that look at the revenues and Building valuations that look at the revenues and the operating costs are improved by having the the operating costs are improved by having the lower operating costs of better facilities. lower operating costs of better facilities. Making repairs to existing equipment versus Making repairs to existing equipment versus advancing the purchase of new better advancing the purchase of new better performing equipmentperforming equipment
6/4/2010 15
Application to design and construction processApplication to design and construction process
LCC analysis has many applications in the capital LCC analysis has many applications in the capital asset, buildings and infrastructure projects that use asset, buildings and infrastructure projects that use the design and construction process. Choosing the the design and construction process. Choosing the appropriate materials and costing out the operating appropriate materials and costing out the operating and maintenance cost of different alternatives and maintenance cost of different alternatives provides the design and construction professional provides the design and construction professional the ability to include the ownerthe ability to include the owner’’s financial criteria as s financial criteria as part of the process. part of the process.
6/4/2010 16
EVALUATING AND PRESENTING THE RESULTSEVALUATING AND PRESENTING THE RESULTSEvaluation approachesEvaluation approachesTotal present valueTotal present valueNet present valueNet present valueSimple paybackSimple paybackTrue paybackTrue paybackEquivalent uniform annual costEquivalent uniform annual costRate of returnRate of returnKWH savings/investment dollarKWH savings/investment dollar
1.1. Savings/benefit to investment ratioSavings/benefit to investment ratio2.2. Graphic analysisGraphic analysis
6/4/2010 17
How do Intelligent and GREEN buildings compliment each other?
Using same Life Cycle Cost principles for Insulating Glass Alternatives
Energy Modeling – LEED and Green Globes
H V A C Equipment and Building Automation Impacts
Energy Price Inflation and Demand Response Programs
6/4/2010 18
Green Building Perspective
• Energy – Efficiency - Metering - Onsite Emergency & Renewable generation
– GridWise capable - Demand Response ready – Net Zero
• Water – Efficiency – Metering – Treatment – Cleaning- Landscaping
• Environmental Management – Storage Tanks - Mold – Maintenance – Operations
– Emergency Response - Training
• Indoor Environment – Daylighting – CO2 and CO monitoring
– IAQ Controls – Filters
• Emissions, Effluent and Other Impacts on the Environment
Noise – NOX – SO2 – Chemicals – Transportation – Heat Island Roofs
6/4/2010 19
6/4/2010 20
6/4/2010 21
Electricity and Peak Demand Charges –Time of Use Rates
12¢ ?8¢ ?
????¢
4.7¢ / 5.5¢
(Source: Energy Cost Savings Council)
Conventional Cost AnalysisAverage Payback Period (PP) and Return on
Investment (ROI) on single technology products.
6/4/2010 23
Softcoat LowE
Meets the Code and provides lowest first cost.
6/4/2010 24
Triple Glazing & Heat Mirror
Alternatives cost more – but save more energy
6/4/2010 25
Window Energy Film Applications
Existing Glass can be improved to lower HVAC costs
6/4/2010 26
Window Energy Film Terminology
6/4/2010 27
IG Insulating PropertiesIG Insulating Properties
Data obtained using L.B.L. (Lawrence Berkeley Laboratories) Window 5.2 analysis program (nfrc/ashae)
2.223.45 4.00
8.00 9.09
14.30
-
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
Doubl
e (Ar 1
")
Hard
Low-E
(Ar 1
")So
ft Lo
w-E (A
r 1")
6/4/2010 28
IG Solar Heat Gain IG Solar Heat Gain CoefficientCoefficient
0.700.67
0.380.32 0.30
-
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
Double
Hard Lo
w-E
Soft Low
-E
Triple
Low-E
Sunlite
Triple
6/4/2010 29
Reduce Energy Bills(Operating Costs)
6/4/2010 30
Reduce HVAC Requirements(Capital Costs)
6/4/2010 31
Reduced Lighting Requirements(Capital & Operating Costs)
6/4/2010 32
Risk and sensitivity to above analysis.Fuel Escalation could less than 4% causing Breakeven to be longerR value energy saving assumptions may not be proportional as assumed.Solar Gain may have greater energy saving and peak shaving impacts.Difference in initial HVAC capital costs should also be considered. Other positive attributes like quiet and no mold may be more valued than energy savings.
6/4/2010 33
Is this Tinted Glass Building Green and Intelligent ?What are the tradeoffs in HVAC, Daylighting & Productivity
6/4/2010 34
Comfort“The best sustainable designs are not just environmentally responsible. They also produce buildings where employees can thrive and productivity can soar”
Christine Ervin President and CEO
U.S. Green Building Council
“Using green building strategies can result in increases in occupant performance measures by 6 to 26 percent.”
William D. Browning Founder of Green Development Services
and Senior Associate of Rocky Mountain Institute
6/4/2010 35
Sustainability Matrix
Net Present Values Market LEED™
CertifiedLEED™
SilverLEED™
GoldLEED™Platinum
Living Building
30 Years $22.7 $19.6 $19.7 $18.5 $18.3 $18.7
60 Years $62.9 $45.3 $36.7 $27.8 $23.7 $19.6
100 Years $348.9 $218.4 $166.9 $95.8 $62.2 $20.8
Total Savings over Market after 30 years
$ - $3.1 $3.0 $4.2 $4.4 $4.0
The David Lucile Packard FoundationLos Altos Project
http://www.packard.org/pdf/2002Matrix.pdf
6/4/2010 36
Financial Benefits of Green Buildings
6/4/2010 37
LCC calculation of Greg Kats –former DOE and IMPVP Executive
6/4/2010 38
Green and Intelligent Building Convergence Review
Energy management for HVAC, Lighting & Demand Response – CBIP – Energy StarGreen Buildings – Environment - LEED & Green GlobeAccess and Security for safety of occupants and visitorsCabling and Wireless to increase revenue and lower costs Communications to increase value and productivityDigital Signage for instant information and advertisingInterconnectivity to other buildings and the communitySmart Grid and Demand Response Ready
6/4/2010 39
CABA INTELLIGENT & INTEGRATED BUILDINGS COUNCIL
Developed the BIQ Rating System for IB with Appraisal Institute and EPA Energy Star support
www.caba.org/biq
Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Tool with Reed Construction Data/RSMeans
www.caba.org/lifecycle
Developed a New Intelligent Building Roadmapwww.caba.org/ibrm
Who is working on bringing these issues all together to evaluate alternatives and make sound economic choices?
6/4/2010 40
Produced by: Thomas J. Lohner, P.E.Vice President, TENG Solutions
Analyzing the Life Cycle Cost of Integrated Building Systems
6/4/2010 41
Systems Integration -Comparative Life Cycle Cost
You Can Not Afford Not to do it Right
6/4/2010 42
Facility Integration Life Cycle Costs
First CostChanges, Additions & UpgradesOperating & Maintenance Utility Costs
UPS
Computer Room A/C
Emergency Generator
Fire Management System
Door Access Control & Intrusion Detection
Lighting Control SystemHVAC Control System
Typical Building Approach to AutomationTypical Building Approach to Automation
Main Service Switchgear
5 User Interface Workstations!
No Integration !No Integration !
6/4/2010 44
Non-Integrated BuildingEngineering Left up to ContractorsSole Sourcing Required to Provide Integration - $$$$Stand Alone Systems - Single PurposeNobody Responsible for Technology Integration
UPS
Computer Room A/C
Fire Management System
Emergency Generator
Main Service Switchgear
SNMP over IP
Web ServerWeb Server Web Server Web Server
Modbus
Web Server
Facility IP Network
Client FMS Workstation Database Server
Partial Integration Concept Partial Integration Concept
HVAC Control SystemLighting Control SystemDoor Access Control & Intrusion Detection
Security Console
Proprietary Control Sub-systems
6/4/2010 46
Partial Integration IssuesSoftware Integration on IP networksUse Web Enabled - FMS Application ProgramMethodology Employed for Existing BuildingsHardware Intensive - Many I/O Servers
6/4/2010 47
BENEFITS Partial Integration
Single User Interface for all SystemsWeb based GUI - Defacto StandardPermits Migration to Open Control Networks -Competitive Bids !
Permits Development of Campus Wide Relational DatabaseDatabase Permits - Maintenance Management , Energy Management , Asset Management, etc.
UPS
Computer Room A/C
Fire Management System
Modbus
Emergency Generator
Main Service Switchgear
SNMP over IP
Web Server
Web Server
Facility IP Network
Client FMS Workstation Database Server
Full Integration Concept Full Integration Concept Open Standards Based Control Sub-systems
LONTALK - EIA 709.1 & BACNET – ANSI/ASHRAE 135A
Door Access Control, Intrusion Detection, Lighting & HVAC Control System
Web Server
Security Console
6/4/2010 49
Full Integration IssuesOpen Standards Applied Where PossibleI/O Servers MinimizedNumber of Devices Reduced - Shared Information
6/4/2010 50
BENEFITS Full Integration
Same as Partial Integration ApproachPLUS
Competitive Bids in each BuildingIntegrated Building Sub-systems
Lighting, HVAC, Power Management and Security
Lowest Life Cycle Cost Approach
6/4/2010 51
Life Cycle Cost Analysis Assumptions
150,000 SF BuildingMajor M & E Equipment Cost - $6.00/SF ($18.00/SF TOTAL)Proprietary Systems Life Cycle - 7 years (FAR)
Replacement Cost = 125% of the Initial System Cost50% of the Proprietary Systems are Replaced (Next Generation)20% of the Open Systems are Replaced (Age & Obsolescence)
Average Cost per Control Device - $400Open and Proprietary Control Devices Base Bid Costs are the SameTraining Costs - $3000/ GUI; $1500/ Protocol; 50% of 1st year cost for years 2 and up
Life Cycle Cost Analysis Assumptions
Dynamic Control Sub-
systems
Initial Cost
($/SF)
Base Year Service Contract
($)
Base Year Annual Changes & Modificatons (% of 1st Cost)
HVAC Controls $1.5/SF 15,000 2%Lighting Controls $1.0/SF 10,000 3%Power Monitoring $0.5/SF 5,000 1%Intrusion Detection $0.3/SF 3,000 2%Total $3.3/SF 33,000$ $39,000
Comparative First Costs
System Component
Non-Integrated Building
Partial Integration
Full Integration
Graphical User Interface - Hardware & Software 5 @ $15K 1 @ $20k 1 @ $20kEquipment Networking Uprades 0 4 @ $2k 4 @ $2kWeb Servers 0 5 @ $10k 3 @ $10kControl Device Reduction (5%) 0 0 -24750
TOTAL $75,000 $78,000 $33,000
Full Integration Savings $42,000 $45,000
No Account For Division 17000 Savings - 20 to 30%!!!
Blinds & 24v Wiring
Non-Integrated HVAC, Lighting & Intrusion Detection Echelon World Headquarters
VAV BoxesNo Occupancy Control
DimmableLighting Control
Sensor and 120v WiringLighting, HVAC & Occupancy Sensor Control Trunk
User Scene Control Switch
Integrated HVAC, Lighting, Intrusion Detection & Blind ControlEchelon World Headquarters
6/4/2010 56
Changes, Additions and Upgrades Issues
Cost Premium Paid for Additions & Changes to Proprietary Controls Limit Scope of Future Improvements and ModificationsCost Premium for Non Competitive Service Contracts
Changes, Additions and Upgrades (Annual Costs- 2nd Year & On )
O & M Cost Issues
Non Competitive
Cost Premium
Non-Integrated Building
Partial Integration
Full Integration
Service Contracts 25% 41,250$ 41,250$ 33,000$ Future Additons & Remodeling 25% 49,500$ 49,500$ 39,600$ Future Software Upgrades 5 @ $1k 1 @ $2k 1 @ $2kYear 7 Replacement Cost Reserve ( 9% APR) 33,629$ 33,629$ 13,452$
Total 129,379$ 126,379$ 88,052$
Full Integration Savings 41,327$ 38,327$
Operating and Maintenance (Annual Costs- 2nd Year & On )
System Component
Non-Integrated Building
Partial Integration
Full Integration
Training 11,250$ 5,250$ 3,750$ Improved O & M Staff Efficiency 0 SOFT SOFT IT Support 5 @ $2k 1 @ $3k 1 @ $3kManagement Reporting 0 (3 @ $1k) (3 @ $1k)
Total 21,250 5,250$ 3,750$ Full Integration Savings $17,500 1,500$
Computerized Maintenace Management 25,000$ First Cost(Extend Major M & E Equipment Life; 25yrs vs 20yrs)Future Worth ($ @ Yr 20) 180,000$ Present Worth (P/F @ 9%) 32,112$
Typical Energy Use Profile
LightingHVACPowerOther
HVACHVAC30% Ave Annual Energy 30% Ave Annual Energy
UseUse
$0.4 / SF / YR$0.4 / SF / YR
$60,000 / YR$60,000 / YR
LightingLighting40% Ave Annual Energy 40% Ave Annual Energy
UseUse
$0.53 / SF / YR$0.53 / SF / YR
$80000 / YR$80000 / YR
PowerPower25% Ave Annual Energy 25% Ave Annual Energy
UseUse
$0.33 / SF / YR$0.33 / SF / YR
$50,000 / YR$50,000 / YR
Other (Elevators, etc.)Other (Elevators, etc.)5% Ave Annual Energy 5% Ave Annual Energy
UseUse
$0.07 / SF / YR$0.07 / SF / YR
$10,000 / YR$10,000 / YR
TOTALTOTAL$1.33 / SF / YR$1.33 / SF / YR
$200,000 / YR$200,000 / YR
Energy Costs (Potential Annual Cost Savings)
System ComponentSavings Factor
Energy Cost ($)
Non-Integrated Building
Partial Integration
Full Integrat
ated Lighting & HVAC Control 5% $60,000 0 0 $3,000oved Load Factor ( .5 to .55) 5% $200,000 0 $10,000 $10,000
Maintained Equipment 1% $60,000 0 $600 $600
dinated Supply/Demand EMS Strategies 5% $200,000 0 $10,000 $10,000
egrated Building Control System Savings $0 $20,600 $23,600
ionIntegrImprBetter
Coor
Int
System Integration Life Cycle Cost Summary
LifCoChangesOperUt
e Cycle Cost Component
Non-Integrated Building
Partial Integration
Full Integration
mparitive First Cost $75,000 $78,000 $33,000, Upgrades & Additions $129,379 $126,379 $88,052
ating & Maintenance $21,250 $5,250 $3,750ility Cost $200,000 $179,400 $179,400
Net Present Value $2,325,232 $2,074,091 $1,773,493Discount Rate 9%
Life Cycle Period (yrs) 10Savings $551,739 $300,598
6/4/2010 62
Conclusion:
Full Integration will Result in the Lowest Net Present ValueThe Value of the Integrated Approach willIncrease w/ IT AdvancesInformation will be your Competitive Advantage
6/4/2010 63
Federal Government ProgramsOntario Energy Board funding for Enbridge and Union Gas Demand Side ManagementOntario Power Authority Conservation ProgramsLocal Distribution Companies – PowerwiseEnergy Service Companies (ESCO)Financial Institutions for Leasing or BorrowingPrivate energy companies for onsite generationDemand Response and Smart Grid options
What are the opportunities to get funding for upgrades and retrofit alternatives that provide lower life cycle costs?
6/4/2010 64
Federal Programs AvailableNatural Resources Canada's Office of Energy Efficiency now offers the ecoENERGY Retrofit Incentive for Buildings, the commercial/institutional component of the ecoENERGY Retrofitfinancial incentives for existing homes, buildings and industrial processes. If you have not yet started a new energy efficiency project, you could receive the lesser of $10 per gigajoule of estimated energy savings or 25 percent of eligible project costs.The program ends in March 31st 2011 or when funds run out. When applying, you will need to provide a pre-project energy audit of your buildings. As well, you cannot incur any costs related to the project until you receive a signed Contribution Agreement.Website: http://oee.nrcan.gc.ca/commercial/financial-assistance/existing/retrofits/index.cfm?attr=0
6/4/2010 65
Provincial Programs AvailableOntario Power Authority – New Construction Program will build on CBIP concept of energy modeling and payment or Low rate interest to facilitate better energy performance.Demand Response 3 – contractual agreement for 100 or 200 hours – incentives paid to schedule by term and amounts.ERIP – Local distribution company programs
6/4/2010 66
Other Programs Available
Renewable and Clean Standard OffersToronto Better Building PartnershipToronto Atmospheric Fund – Financing BOMA Toronto – CDMOPA for Continuous Commissioning and Next Gen Building AutomationTax credits and Class 43 Accelerated Depreciation on qualified equipment
6/4/2010 67
Financing Options
Self – Finance – Your cost of moneyToronto Atmospheric Fund – Financing Lease or Rent – morEnergy OptionsLow interest loans – Banks and Credit UnionsEnergy Service Companies using Performance contractsCarbon Credits and other Trading Schemes
6/4/2010 68
Demand Response Marketplaceand DR programs in Ontario
Demand-Response-Shop.comCollaboration Project with Sheridan College-Building Intelligence Quotient-RFQ Strategies partially funded by Ontario Centres of Excellence
David KatzBiQ Program ManagerPrincipal - Sustainable Environmental SolutionsConnectivity Week - May 24, 2010
Information on Ontario Power Authority Programs are generalizations and subject to change
6/4/2010 69
Ontario Power Authority Integrated Power System PlanConservation - LEED – Green Globe –BOMA BEStConservation Measures - TechnologyDistributed Generation OpportunitiesStandard Offers – Renewable – Clean EnergyDemand Response ProgramsDR Technologies – Building SectorDemand Response Shop websiteSmart Grid –Building2Grid optimizationQuestions
Demand Response and BAS Improvements
6/4/2010 70
Conservation ObjectivesDevelop a Culture of ConservationProvide the CDM programs to reduce MW:
New programs in all sectors – Public – Private MASH, Residential, Commercial, Industrial New technologies – Savings must be measurable Summer Peak – Demand Response ProgramsElectrical energy savings and fuel switchingHVAC, Lighting, Power Quality, Power Factor
Incentives pay up to $800/kW or $0.10/kWh
6/4/2010 71
Previous technologies now economicNew technologies save and measure itBuilding Automation more IntelligentOccupancy, Demand HVAC, Daylighting LEED and Green Globe CreditsLife cycle costs and low cost of fundsPeak and Energy reduction targets now mandated to each of 80+ Ontario LDC’s
Old and New Technologies
6/4/2010 72
Distributed GenerationEnergy costs only going up even with CDM programs.NERC/FERC Reliability rules in harmony with Canadian
Feed-In-Tarff and Standard Offers FIT 20 year fixed Range - PV/$0.802/kWh Rooftop <10kW going down to $0.433/kWh for < 10 MW on groundWind, Hydro &Biomass – Range from $0.10-$020/kWh with some peak premiums and some escalation to CPI
CESOP–On Hold $0.081/kWh Peak and $0.0432 Off peak with some fuel price adjustmentsNot on HEAT portion Only for certain hours and 8 monthsDemand Response Programs took precedent in IPSP
6/4/2010 73
Demand Response Technologies
Lighting – Dimming – Occupancy -DaylightingRaise Cooling Temperature – Casual Day ClothesChiller Optimization – Hartman LOOPChillers - Gas Driven – AbsorptionThermal Storage – ICE - WaterVSD – Pumps – Fans - ReprogramOn site Generation – Economics?Windows - Shades -Tinting
6/4/2010 74
Abitibi Consolidated Company of Canada Air Products Canada Limited Algoma Steel Inc. Atlantic Packaging Products Ltd. Bowater Canadian Forest Products, Inc. CPower Inc. CVRD Inco Limited Direct Energy Marketing Limited Energy Advantage Inc. Energy Curtailment Specialists Inc. EnerNOC Inc. Enershift Corporation Essroc Canada Inc. Lafarge Canada Inc.NRGen Inc. Praxair Canada Inc. Sobeys Capital Incorporated St. Marys Cement Inc. (Canada) St. Marys Paper Corp. Tembec Industries Inc. Wescast Industries Inc.
6/4/2010 75
Demand Response #1Key Program Features:The DRP is a voluntary program that allows participants to receive compensation for curtailing the electricity demand of their Projects.Projects can be based on load interruption, load shifting or behind the meter generation (excluding diesel, coal, bi-fuel, and bio-diesel).No maximum on the number of hours of operation. Load curtailmentis voluntary. Minimum of 0.5 MW load reduction, achievable for at least one hour in a relevant season.No financial penalties for under or over performance.Participants offer their own ‘strike price’ on a monthly basis, at which they are willing to curtail load. The Participant’s strike price must be higher than the minimum defined Floor Strike Price for the month.Project applications must include a Measurement and Verification(M&V) Plan, acceptable to the OPA and all curtailments must be verified by an M&V Consultant.Participants receive monthly payments for curtailment.
6/4/2010 76
Demand Response #2Contractual response load shifting.Availability payment $/MWh for term of contract. Higher availability for higher reliability.Minimum contracted hours with penalties for non-conformance.Minimum differential price. Differential set by time period and by season. Published one month in advance of season.For each hour of active load reduction, the differential is the difference between the average HOEP for all hours in that time slot for the week, and the average of all offpeak hours in the week.Participant is paid the difference between the OPA Minimum Differential and the Actual Differential for all hours of the week where load was curtailed, if the difference between the OPA Minimum Differential and the Actual Differential is positive.Participant may also be eligible for peak premium incentive and location specific incentives
6/4/2010 77
Contractual Load Shedding with DR aggregatorSchedule Term (1, 3, or 5 yrs)Contracted Dispatch PeriodElection of Option A (100 hrs) or Option B (200 hrs)Not Fully Available for CurtailmentElection:(1) using the four hour period prior to Curtailment or(2) the four hour period prior to receiving an Activation NoticeDifferent rates for Standard, Premium, Discount areasSome areas of province are X no participation allowed due to system conditions and contracts with others.
Demand Response #3
6/4/2010 78
6/4/2010 79
List of Participating Aggregators
Some withdrew
6/4/2010 80
(BUILDING INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT CONSORTIUM)
IN COLLABORATION WITH
Sheridan College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning
LAUNCH
DEMAND-RESPONSE-SHOP-CONSORTIUM(DRSC)
ANDDEMAND-RESPONSE-SHOP.COM AND .CA
Rating and Certification
(demonstrates the added value)
Upgrade Design and
Implementation Guidance
(demystifies implementation)
+
- an online tool
6/4/2010 83
SCREEN
Of BiQ
For building info after log-in
Report for Middleton Hall
Building Intelligence Quotient AssessmentBuilding Intelligence Quotient Assessment
Chart of BiQ rating for each section generated as part of the report
Middleton Hall achieved an overall rating of 78% at the New system/Upgrade Stage
Integrated design
Education
Selection of sub-systems
Value factors for automation systems
Business considerations
Subsystem stand-alone custom features
Subsystem stand-alone performance
Interaction among subsystems
BAS Equipment
0 20 40 60 80 100
Secure Procurement System for RFI, RFQ and RFP with on line submissions and processing reverse auction and other capabilities
Secure Procurement System for RFI, RFQ and RFP with on line submissions and processing reverse auction and other capabilities
6/4/2010 87
The Sheridan Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning is one of Canada's premier polytechnic institutes and is dedicated to exceptional applied learning and graduate success. They are a leader in providing skills-based educational programming that integrates theory with application, preparing students for careers in visual and performing arts, business, community services and technical fields. Sheridan serves close to 15,000 full-time students annually at its campuses in Oakville and Brampton, Ontario
6/4/2010 88
While a few large companies with heavy energy loads and significant peak demand charges already know about the various demand response (DR) programs, many smaller companies do not. The current energy demand issues are the responsibility of the facility or production personnel while the supply side issues are currently under the procurement and purchasing responsibilities. The need for an integrated approach to critically evaluate the opportunities for load curtailment, the resulting costs or inconvenience and the benefits from the various offers from the DRaggregators will be addressed by the Demand-Response-Shop.com and .ca websites and the on line Building Intelligence Quotient and DR procurement service it will provide.
6/4/2010 89
The key objective is to educate users on the various demand response programs. It will gather the vast experience in DRfrom global jurisdictions and provide the framework for comprehensive rational decision analysis for participating in the DR program. The site will provide a forum and blog to discuss and develop greater recognition of the many different loads that can be part of the demand response in a building and other facilities. The DR website and the Demand-Response-Shop-Consortium DR services will provide the user with cost effective time and effort to acquire and evaluate the DR alternatives that provide optimum value from the DR payments. The benefit of using the CABA BiQ program prior to pursuing DR payments allows the customer to evaluate all the energy management opportunities especially the building automation controls that will make the DR program respond as required when called upon with short notice or automated dispatch.
6/4/2010 90
The targeted user groups are the DR aggregators approved by the regulatory authorities and all the potential customers who want independent assessments of their offerings. While each aggregator may have their own DR assessment methodology and target only certain loads this website will meet the needs of the end users. For a small fee early adopters will be provided with a rating and the development of their unique site specific on line for DR investment and incentives.The competitive process and the financial evaluation of the alternatives will increase DR life cycle benefits. The website will include the publication of these pilot DRprocurements on the site and in energy related journals to increase DR market penetration. Links will be provided to associations such as CABA, BOMA and IFMA to have their members benefit from this program.Work is underway with partial funding from the Ontario Centre for Excellence – Energy Division
6/4/2010 91
SummaryGRID has massive investment needsConservation finally getting recognitionRenewable energy needs incentives but offer environmental and health benefitsDistributed Clean generation can play a large role and can be profitableDemand Response can be part of solutionPeak Shaping – Shedding – ShavingEducation on DR and the Building 2 Smart Grid is essential –Demand-Response-Shop.com addressing the need and providing the facilitation for maximizing DR incentives and linking to energy efficiency
6/4/2010 92
Contact InfoDavid Katz, MBA, BADavid Katz, MBA, BA
Sustainable Resources Management Inc. Sustainable Resources Management Inc. 6 Morning Gloryway6 Morning Gloryway
Toronto, OntarioToronto, OntarioCanada Canada MM2H 3M22H 3M2Tel: 416Tel: 416--493493--92329232Fax: 416Fax: 416--493493--53665366
Email: Email: [email protected]@sustainable.on.caBuilding Intelligence Quotient ConsortiumBuilding Intelligence Quotient Consortium
Email: dkatz@buildingEmail: [email protected]