z. nemecek, j. safrankova, l. prech, o. goncharov, o. gutynska, p. cagas, a. komarek, f. nemec, k....

29
Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas, A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic G. Zastenker, I. Koloskova, M. Riazantseva IKI RAN, Moscow, Russia The authors would like to acknowledge the effort of numerous collaborators that participate in the BMSW development and calibration, namely: J. Vaverka – FC modeling, I. Cermak – hardware development, L. Chesalin – telemetry interface, N. Shevyrev – FC modeling, A. Leibov – device calibration OVERVIEW OF INTERESTING RESULTS FROM BMSW

Upload: elom

Post on 25-Feb-2016

35 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

OVERVIEW OF INTERESTING RESULTS FROM BMSW. Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas, A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic G. Zastenker, I. Koloskova, M. Riazantseva - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas, A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic

G. Zastenker, I. Koloskova, M. RiazantsevaIKI RAN, Moscow, Russia

The authors would like to acknowledge the effort of numerous collaborators that participate in the BMSW development and calibration, namely:

J. Vaverka – FC modeling, I. Cermak – hardware development, L. Chesalin – telemetry interface, N. Shevyrev – FC modeling,

A. Leibov – device calibration

OVERVIEW OF INTERESTING RESULTS FROM BMSW

Page 2: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

Bright Monitor of the Solar Wind (BMSW)Developed by Charles University in Prague and Space Research Institute in Moscow for Spektr-R

• Three Faraday cups for determination of the speed and temperature - 0, 1, 2

• Three declined Faraday cups for determination of the density and velocity direction – 3, 4, 5

• Launch July 18, 2011

• Apogee ~50 RE

• Inclination 65o

• Orbital period ~8.5 days

• Time resolution 31 ms

• Three axis stabilized

0

1

3

2

4

5

Safrankova et al. (SSR, 2013)

Page 3: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

Overview of new results The contribution deals with:1. Helium abundance and its variations 2. Shock front, its structure, and thickness 3. Solar wind turbulence

1

23

Page 4: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

An example of measurements and their comparison with other spacecraft

• All spacecraft measure similar features on a scale of hours

• Notable differences on scale of minutes

• BMSW shows a high level of fluctuations

at the kinetic scale

2.5 hours

BMSW-Spektr-R 3DP-Wind ESA-THEMIS B

25 minutes 60 seconds

15 seconds

Page 5: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

BMSW in the sweeping mode

BMSW in the sweeping mode; speed of measurements – 0.031 s

- a full set of solar wind parameters – 1-3 s- details of distributions – protons and alphas

Protons

Alphas

Page 6: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

Helium abundance in the solar wind

An average content of the alpha particles is ~3-4% He relative content varies with the solar cycle He content is statistically larger within fast solar wind streams that

originate from coronal holes. Na/Np ratio ranges from 0.5 to 10%; even larger values were

observed within ICMEs Helium content rises with the solar wind speed but there is no direct

correlation (correlation 0.94 for the slow solar wind only - Kasper et al., 2007)

Smaller attention was devoted to fast abundance variations connected probably with different waves originated on the Sun(Rakowski and Laming; Ebert et al.; Bourouaine et al., 2012)

Page 7: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

Alpha particle computation

Protons

Derivation of retarding characteristics – ion distribution function

Alpha particles

An example of He content variations

• There are large variations of Na/Np ratios – from 2 to 12%

• These variations cannot be connected with solar cycle and with a change of the solar wind stream

Page 8: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

Abrupt changes of helium contentThe speed of large variations

An example (April 11, 2012) of large variations in the He content without any change of the solar wind speed; but with changes of the density and thermal velocity

• The change of the Na/Np ratio from 0.5 to 4.5% lasts 10 s, i.e., ~0.5 RE

• Gyroradius of alphas is ~0.2 RE

• How can be such short front formed?

• Is it a signature of two different streams?

Page 9: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

Statistical analysisAn example of observation probability of different Na/Np ratios as a function of the solar wind speed

0 < Na/Np < 3

3 < Na/Np < 6

6 < Na/Np

All ratios

No clear dependence on the solar wind type, maybe three different groups?

• Limited set of observations (~120 hours) within one year

• Limited solar

wind speed (< 600 km/s)

Page 10: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

Analysis of He abundanceStatistics of Na/Np ratio changes as a function of solar wind parameters – the density, bulk and thermal speeds

1. A low proton density implies low relative He content regardless sw speed or temperature

2. A rise of mean He content with speed only for large densities (> 15 cm-3)

3. Enhanced He content for limited ranges of the proton speed and density

4. A decrease of the He abundance with proton temperature

5. A very low He abundance at large sw speeds

(> 525 km/s)

1

2

3

4

4

5

Page 11: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

Temporary conclusion – He abundance

Abrupt changes of the relative He abundance without changes of the speed are frequent

There are some indices in favor of a “third state” of the solar wind

Already reported rise of the He abundance with the speed is observed only in a sufficiently dense solar wind

The He abundance depends on the proton temperature or, more probable, the He abundance controls the proton temperature

In spite of still small amount of the data, we have found:

Page 12: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

Solar wind turbulence Solar wind is heated by dissipation of turbulent

structures but the nature of dissipation processes would depend on the scale

Until present, only MHD scale was accessible for experimental investigation of plasma turbulence due to insufficient time resolution of sounding devices

The experimental evidence was based on analysis of magnetic field measurements but the coupling between plasma and magnetic field is principally different at MHD and kinetic scales

BMSW device provides the plasma moments with 31 ms time resolution – well inside the kinetic scale

Page 13: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

How to reach the ion kinetic scale ?

• Three identical FCs • Voltages on deceleration grids of FC1 and FC2 set by a feedback to

obtain ~ 50% and 30% of the FC0 current• 3 points of the distribution are enough to calculate basic plasma

moments • Maximum time resolution is given by telemetry bit rate

FC current

FC2

FC0

FC1

Page 14: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

Expectation on solar wind turbulence• Power law frequency spectrum with

several segments• -1 slope on large scale determined

by the solar activity• -5/3 (Kolgomorov) slope at the

MHD scale (MHD waves)• -7/3 slope at the ion kinetic scale

(KAW, ion cyclotron waves)• A steeper slope at the electron

scale

-1

-?

-7/3-5/3

Years to days MHD kineticion electron

Pow

er s

pect

ral d

ensi

ty

ωc

• Our knowledge is based on theoretical considerations and on analysis of magnetic field fluctuations or

• On the analysis of the spacecraft potential that is used as a proxy of the electron density (e.g., Chen et al., 2012, 2013)

Page 15: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

First example of frequency spectraFirst spectra revealed several peculiarities:

• Clearly different slopes at low- and high-frequency ranges

• Slightly different slopes for analyzed parameters

• A plateau (sometimes a peak) near the break frequency

• Another hump at the end of our frequency range

Page 16: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

Instrumental noise• When the solar wind is extremely quiet the

velocity spectra are spoiled by the preamplifier noise

• This effect decreases the available frequency range

Noise spectrum determined onboard

Frequency spectrum of speed

Frequency spectrum of preamplifier noise

Page 17: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

Spectral analysis of plasma moments

• Spectral slopes of density and velocity fluctuations are different• Spectral slopes in the MHD range are close to 5/3 but often lower • Spectral slopes in the kinetic range are always larger than 7/3• The break frequency of density fluctuations is larger, whereas that of velocity

(temperature) fluctuations is lower than ion cyclotron frequency

N V Vth

1.28

3.182.69

1.01

3.57

1.01

0.29 Hz 0.14 Hz0.1 Hz

Page 18: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

First statistics

• The break between scales is above the cyclotron frequency for density fluctuations but below it for the velocity

• The break frequency decreases with the ion inertial length

• The slope is about 5/3 in the MHD scale and about 3 in the kinetic scale

• Both slopes decrease with the ion inertial length

Ion inertial length Ion inertial length

Ion cyclotron frequency

Spec

tral

bre

ak [H

z]

Spec

tral

slo

pe (d

ensi

ty)

Spec

tral

bre

ak [H

z]

Kinetic scale

MHD scale

Velocity

Density

Safrankova et al. (PRL, 2013)

Page 19: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

A new emission?

• The spectra of moments often exhibit a plateau or a peak at a fraction of ion cyclotron frequency

• This peak/plateau is more often seen at density spectra

• A similar plateau can be found in the Wind magnetic field magnitude

ωc

N V Vth

ωcωc

B

Page 20: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

Spectral analysis of FC currents

Power spectra of FC currents allow us to determine which part of the distribution is responsible for a particular feature

FC2

FC1

FC0

FC0 FC1 FC2

• It can be clearly seen that the hump on the density spectrum is caused by the low energy part of the distribution in this particular case

• The presence of the hump increases the break frequency

Page 21: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

A novel description of the spectra

Ion inertial length

-5/3

• An example of precise processing of density fluctuations for statistical results

• This example is taken from June 2, 2012, 01-06 UT (5 hours) • FFT is computed on ~20-min time interval with shift of ~2 minutes

Three different spectral slopes are clearly revealed

Page 22: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

Temporary conclusion - turbulence BMSW provides reliable moments of the ion distribution with 31 ms time

resolution The instrumental noise does not spoil the frequency spectra that can be

determined down to ion kinetic scale for all moments A mean slope of ~1.5 (i.e., close to 5/3) was found for the MHD scale,

whereas a mean value of 3.2 at the kinetic scale is much larger than 7/3 The break frequency is larger than ion cyclotron frequency for density

fluctuations, whereas it is lower for velocity and temperature – does it mean that the compressible fluctuations survive longer?

The break frequency decreases with the ion inertial length – why? A significant enhancement of the fluctuation level below the ion cyclotron

frequency was often observed in spectra of all plasma moments Similar enhancement can be identified in magnetic field spectra

Page 23: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

Interplanetary and bow shock studies

• INTERSHOCK• BIFRAM • Bow shock on May 12,

1985• 0.6 s resolution • Plasma deceleration in

front of the shock• Large amplitude

oscillations downstreamDo you remember this figure?

~2 min

Zastenker et al. (1986)

MOTIVATION

Page 24: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

An example of IP shock registration

• A shock ramp duration ~0.48 s• It corresponds to 355 km• Ion gyroradius – ~800 km• What is the mechanism of the

shock creation?• Is the shock built by electrons?• An evolution of the ion

distribution on the scale shorter than ion gyroradius seems to be impossible – faster measurements of the full ion distributions are required

Page 25: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

Analysis of the distribution function

• Plasma parameters are computed from 3 points of distribution – how reliable is this method at shocks?

• The normalization of the FC current to the full ion flux enables determination of plasma parameters even in highly disturbed environment of the shock

• The three-point method (adaptive mode of BMSW) is based on this normalization• The first ion distribution measured after the shock ramp reveals complete

thermalization within ~2 ion gyro-periods

After shock ramp

Prior to shock ramp

Ion distributions measured 2.4 sapart (4 proton

gyro-periods)

Page 26: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

Two extreme cases of IP shocks• The ramp width

varies by an order of amplitude

• The width correlates with the proton thermal gyro-radius (1-4 Rt)

• Reflected ions cannot participate in a ramp formation

• A role of electrons should be investigated

• Shock ramp duration - 0.48 s• Shock speed – 743 km/s• Shock ramp width – 355 km/s• Thermal proton gyroradius – 19 km• Ion inertial length – 87 km

• Shock ramp duration - 0.1 s• Shock speed – 476 km/s• Shock ramp width – 46 km/s• Thermal proton gyroradius – 16 km• Ion inertial length – 32 km

Page 27: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

Upstream and downstream waves • Non-phase standing precursor

whistler waves and steepened magnetosonic waves with leading whistler – shocklets were observed upstream of quasi-perpendicular IP shocks (Wilson et al., 2009, 2010, 2012)

• Downstream – irregular ULF fluctuations and regular high-frequency waves were reported (Kajdic et al., 2012)Upstream waves

Downstream waves

A preliminary analysis shows that wavelength of downstream waves increases with the IPS ramp thickness.

Page 28: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

Temporary conclusion - shocks Gradients of ion parameters observed at the IP shock are as step as

those of the magnetic field or electron temperature (Schwartz et al., 2012)

The shock ramp thickness is only 2 - 4 ion inertial lengths (or thermal proton gyroradii)

What is the mechanism of the proton heating on such a small scale? No clear correlation of the shock ramp thickness with the magnetic

field, solar wind parameters and/or their combinations was found A preliminary analysis shows that wavelength of downstream waves

increases with the IPS ramp thickness

Page 29: Z. Nemecek, J. Safrankova, L. Prech, O. Goncharov, O. Gutynska, P. Cagas,  A. Komarek, F. Nemec, K. Jelinek

Collection of a significantly larger data set

Statistical analysis of spectral slopes and investigation of dependences of slopes and break frequencies on other parameters

Search for the sources of enhanced fluctuations

Search for the cause of fast large variations of the He abundance

A further analysis of the IP shock (and bow shock) ramp and waves connected with it

Directions of further investigations

Thank youfor your attention