zenith investment research premium wealth management annual conference presented by:david wright,...
TRANSCRIPT
Zenith Investment Research
Premium Wealth Management Annual ConferencePresented by: David Wright, Director
17 April 2012
Team up with an experienced, independent and incisive research provider
Disclaimer
simplifyingRESEARCH
This presentation has been prepared exclusively for the Premium Wealth Management Conference. The presentation contains recommendations and advice of a general nature and does not have regard to the particular circumstances or needs of any specific person who may read it. Each client should assess either personally or with the assistance of a licensed financial adviser whether the Zenith recommendation or advice is appropriate to their situation before making an investment decision. The information contained in the presentation is believed to be reliable, but its completeness and accuracy is not guaranteed. Opinions expressed may change without notice.
Zenith accepts no liability, whether direct or indirect arising from the use of information contained in this presentation. No part of this presentation is to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any investment. The performance of the investment in this presentation is not a representation as to future performance or likely return. The material contained in this presentation is subject to copyright and may not be reproduced without the consent of the copyright owner. Zenith usually receives a fee for assessing the fund manager and product(s) described in this document against accepted criteria considered comprehensive and objective.
Agenda
simplifyingRESEARCH
• The old news – portfolio construction since GFC
• Developments in portfolio construction
• Understanding Portfolio Risk
• Portfolio Construction – where to from here?
Portfolio Construction since the GFC
simplifyingRESEARCH
Common portfolio construction practices
• A big move from active to passive managers
• A move from managed to direct in Australian equities
• Strong demand for tactical asset allocation approaches
• Investors satisfied with term deposit rates
ACTIVE
PASSIVE
Portfolio Construction since the GFC
simplifyingRESEARCH
A reduction in portfolio diversification caused by:
• Confusion in the use and allocation of:
• Global Equities & hedged and unhedged weightings
• REITs – Australian & Global
• Polarised use of alternatives asset classes & strategies
• Long / short Australian Equities
• CTA’s & global macro funds
Portfolio Construction since the GFC
simplifyingRESEARCH
• In conclusion, many advisers continue to build portfolios for “fair weather” investment market conditions waiting for markets to improve.
• Very overweight Australian equities
• High levels of cash and term deposits
• Very low levels of diversification
Market Conditions to Improve
Portfolio Risk
simplifyingRESEARCH
What is it?
• The potential for capital loss
• The potential not to reach your investment goals (e.g. Underfunded retirement savings)
• Uncertainty of investment outcome
Developments in Portfolio Construction
simplifyingRESEARCH
Page 8
• Objective based investing
• Risk targeted investing
• Inflation plus return targets
• Target date / Life stage funds
• Annuity / Insurance policy funds
Developments in Portfolio Construction
simplifyingRESEARCH
Page 9
Risk targeted investing
• Objective is to manage portfolio to a specific risk (volatility) target with the return being an “outcome” (e.g. Investment Science SRA 4, 9, 16 Funds)
• Characteristics of this approach
• Tends to provide more certain volatility outcome
• Over long term returns similar magnitude to “old fashioned” diversified funds (e.g. Conservative, Balanced, Growth) but with lower volatility over short term periods
• Outperform in poor market conditions, Underperform in bull market conditions
• Underlying asset allocation ranges are non existent or very wide
Developments in Portfolio Construction
simplifyingRESEARCH
Page 10
Inflation Plus target investing
• Objective is to manage portfolio to a specific inflation plus return target (e.g. Schroder’s Real Return Fund – Inflation Plus 4.0% p.a.)
• Characteristics of this approach
• Seeking to retain the real rate of return (investor’s purchasing power) above inflation
• Not a specific absolute return target but linked to level of inflation. When inflation high, absolute return level is high and vice versa
• Tend to outperform traditional diversified funds in high inflation environment, possibly underperform in lower inflation environments
• Underlying asset allocation ranges are non existent or very wide
• The approach lends itself best to a single manager fund
Developments in Portfolio Construction
simplifyingRESEARCH
Page 11
Target Date / Lifestage Funds
• Objective is to manage portfolio to a specific risk date
• Characteristics of this approach
• In US typically offered as retirement date or target date in 5yr increments (e.g. 2015, 2020, 2025)
• In UK default age based offerings – switch at birthdays by plan sponsor
• Driven by “glide path” approach to asset allocation. That is, asset allocation is “calibrated” by vintage of fund.
• Can be more easily managed by a single manager rather than multi-manager approach.
OBJECTIVEOBJECTIVEOBJECTIVE
Developments in Portfolio Construction
simplifyingRESEARCH
Page 12
Glide Path – Target Date / Lifestage Funds
Developments in Portfolio Construction
simplifyingRESEARCH
Page 13
Glide Path - Target Date / Lifestage Funds
Developments in Portfolio Construction
simplifyingRESEARCH
Page 14
MySuper Implications
• Pressure on super fund trustees to do more for apathetic members than place them in default “balanced” investment option
• Q-Super looking to collect financial data (salary, super balance, years to retirement) on members to assist in determining appropriate investment option for members
• This is essentially fund level financial planning and is likely to become more common
IMPLICATIONS
Developments in Portfolio Construction
simplifyingRESEARCH
Page 15
After Tax returns will become greater focus by the industry
• After tax returns are determined by the asset allocation approach and manager selections
• At the fund research level, Zenith considers the impact of the following factors :
• Portfolio Turnover
• Carried Forward Losses
• Impact of Currency Hedging & derivatives
• TOFA Rules
Portfolio Construction – Where to from here?
simplifyingRESEARCH
• Attempt to build portfolios with more certain outcomes
• Understand where the risks in the portfolio are
• Demonstrate and report value add to clients
• Increased use of model portfolios
Balanced Model PortfolioForward Looking Annualised Return Projections
simplifyingRESEARCH
Page 17
Cash Expectation 3.59%
Balanced Model Portfolio ProjectionsExpected Value of $1 Million investment
simplifyingRESEARCH
Page 18
Return Forecast Component Example
simplifyingRESEARCH
Page 22
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
Risk Free Plus Return Premium Active Management Max Franking Credit Rebate Yield
Reporting for Advisers – Fund Contribution
simplifyingRESEARCH
Page 23
Reporting will highlight the individual contributions of each fund to overall portfolio performance
Reporting for Advisers - Portfolio Attribution
simplifyingRESEARCH
Page 24
Attribution analysis is different to contribution analysis
Reporting for Advisers - After Tax AnalysisIncome Distribution Yields to June-11
simplifyingRESEARCH
Page 25
Portfolio Construction – Where to from here?
simplifyingRESEARCH
• In an uncertain environment we need to build “all weather” portfolios.
• Increase diversification and seek as many sources of
uncorrelated returns as possible thereby not relying on one or two
engines for growth. This includes active use of:
• A more complete range of asset classes; and
• Alternative investment strategies
Portfolio Construction – Where to from here?
simplifyingRESEARCH
• If the global environment doesn’t get better, cash rates in Australia will be lower.
• Path dependency a real issue
• Start or re-instate client’s investment strategy by “averaging in” over a period of time