zoomcat14xs

39
ZOOM CA t 14

Upload: judson

Post on 08-Mar-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

ZOOMCAt 14

ZOOMCAt 12

On cites and seeing

The urban condition is active sediment. It is a precipitated convergence and par ticulate binding of flows in

time, both immediate, in reference to the layering of material constructions and infrastructural trajectories,

and abstractly as flows of social and technical networked connections, it is a production more than a

product, plasticity in the guise of the concreteness.

The contemporary city is becoming less about the definitive extensions of regularizing conventions and

planned programmability and more an existing site for a collection of populations associated by activity

and process, overlapping and inter twined through spatial paths that the itinerary discloses often in the

flash of a ring tone. Within the temporal flux of daily events, the unfolding spatial fabric of the city can be

understood through the development of the voided territory, or in-betweens. The lost spaces are the unclaimed publics and informational edges of an emerging urbanism that constitute the antithesis of the

planned element and/or event, found at the edges of express ways, parking lots, public parks, sidewalks,

and corporate master plans.

The unaccountable absences, gaps, and shears begin to operate more like a plane of consistency within the developed landscape forming countless seams and transitional boundaries across the urban field.

These boundary conditions are growth lines of territoriality and control within the urban ecology. The

materiality of a field transition constitutes a narrative of influences, capacities and desires within a given

location in relation to the greater development of the city as a directive agent with a grand lagging set of

customary reactions and channels of capital responsiveness . From the scale of micro infrastructural, such as paving techniques and street-curb-sidewalk construction, through lot modulations, block scale

developments, and the infrastructural construction of highways, rail lines and water systems, the urban

field is comprised of an infinite array of seams and transitions ingrained with environmental conditions

and developmental logics. The question of how these territorial lines are strategized and leveraged within

the urban stratum to activate and facilitate future growth and organization is largely overlooked and under utilized. The banality of the constructed edge holds within the potential of the translational third, with an

ability to accumulate program or ecological controls to enhance and extend the existing dialogue of bordering influences.

Understanding the formation, growth and, decay of these urban systems provides a novel and fundamental way of seeing place. Places are processes, embedded with organizational and developmental

logics of environmental flows and programmatic relationships. The critical connection is not only seeing the relationship of objects within given sites, or contexts, but tracking the productions and lives that flow

between the fixed points and material borders.

Working with the organizational and developmental logics of local environmental processes and

programmatic relationships, my research is an exploration to unear th prototypical architectures, grounded in the immediacy of existing sites and ingrained with the potential to inherently connect people and what

they do, to where they are.

This section of work represents a continued development of research and practice spanning professional architectural projects, research projects, competitions, and

process.

The projects are grounded in an ongoing interest in the integration of architectural systems and specific places. They explore the utilization of cultural, environmental

and programmatic resources at effective material and temporal scales.

Henry Point

HW67Aeratorpark

Big BayTactile Spectrum

Process

Judson Moore

ZOOMCAt 14selected work

selected work

The Henry Point project is a 830 sf loft addition and intensive reprogramming of an existing lake cabin in nor thern Idaho.

Located on a hillside proper ty overlooking Hayden Lake, the project

connects a constant rotation of family and friends to the surrounding landscape through a series of extensive decks and operable facades

that create large indoor/outdoor gathering spaces, while providing the

ability of the cabin to function as two independent living areas.

The addition is shifted back and realigned to produce a sequence of spatial filters that smoothly mediate levels of exposure for more

private areas of the home and take advantage of numerous views to

the lake. Remaining connected through the common the programs of

kitchen, dining, and living areas, the addition and existing cabin are

designed as a series of transitional interior and exterior spaces,

imbedded with the ability to programmatically reconfigure and adapt to seasons, lake lifestyle, and the evolving needs of a growing family.

HENRY POINT HOUSEHAYDEN LAKE ID

1 existing living

2 kitchen

3 bedroom

4 bath

5 utility

6 living

7 bath

8 bedroom

9 deck

10 fire pit

11 existing deck

12 cour tyard

tree pattern studieslayering of screen and environment

screen elevation studies

section looking nor th

The HW67 house constitutes a renovation of, and addition to, a historic landmark

house in Glen Rose, Texas. Built in 1874 the original structure is constructed of

locally quarried load bearing limestone and axe hewn cedar beams and lintels.

A dilapidated and failing addition added in the early 1900’s was deconstructed and

repurposed as material for the new addition encompassing a utility core of

kitchen, bath, and dining space.

The original shell and roof structure was preserved with revisions to internally

damaged components including the floor joists and window treatments. A damaged por tion of the second floor was removed to open up a full height living space and

sleeping loft.

The added components of the project are designed to respond to the encroaching

highway (67) on the west frontage of the proper ty while opening up to views of the

river bottom and native landscape to the nor th and east.

The project is currently under construction

HW67 HOUSEGLEN ROSE TX

1

23

5

4

6

7

8

9

10

1 front porch2 existing: living3 existing:living / study4 new stair5 utility landing6 kitchen7 living / dining8 east porch9 master restroom10 rock apron

hw67 house

0 1 5 15

AERATORPARKMEDIATIVE URBANISMS COMPETITION

LOUISVILLE KY

1

9 10

11

3

2

7

6

134

12

5

14

8

15

1. condensing field a_ high ground2. condensing field b_ low ground

3. condensing field c_ playing fields4. amphitheater

5. urban forest zone6. creek and floodplain

7. main street connector8. transfer center

9. mixed use /retail 0110. mixed use / retail 02

11. transfer lot12. grounds

13. main street bridge 14. primary circulation bridges

15. secondary circulation bridges

site plan

aeratorpark

aerate:1 : to supply or entrain a substrate with air (as a soil or a liquid)2 : to supply with oxygen by respiration

The aeratorpark is a new urban park and transit center for the city of Louisville, KY that integrates the productive potentials of transpor tation networks, alternative land use strategies and embedded remediation technologies to create a highly adaptable cultural center and highly functional pollutant filtering landscape.

Previously inhabited by distilleries and metal scrap yards, the site holds extraordinary potential as a cultural and metropolitan destination, but requires extensive clean up. Responding to the primary concern of contamination, the aeratorpark is strategized around the transformative and economical organization of remediation berms. Contaminated soil is efficiently graded into three areas of treatment, creating fields of phytoremediation furrows and filtering swales. All of the existing on-site materials, waste and structures are recycled and reorganized to detain, treat, and filter any previous or future pollutants. Additionally the berming produces a unique topography for numerous programmatic conditions as an urban park and transit hub.

Building on the unique location and existing topography of the site, the aerator park employs the intelligent control of hydrology to facilitate the development two principle ecological zones. The condensing fields represent the open and previously programmed areas of the site. The berms filter water to treat existing soil conditions and aid in the passive control of hydrology. The creek bed, defined by steep embankments and western flood plain, is re-appropriated as an urban forest, fur ther

filtering the sites watershed, and providing a viable carbon sink.

SITE SECTION

NATIVE OVERSTORY

PIN OAK

SHELLBACK HICKORY

SYCAMOREBLACK LOCUST

NATIVE UNDERSTORYAND HERBACOUS

GRAY DOGWOODAMERICAN HORNBEAM

ARROW WOODSEDGES

CUTGRASSWILD MILLET

GROUND COVERWILD RYE

DEER TONGUE GRASSPANIC GRASS

SWITCHGRASSREDTOP AGROSTIS

ALSIKE CLOVER

>>

>>pollutants in

oxygen out

remediation berms carbon sink

program type a program type b+

remediation berming plan topographical zones and creek hydrology

landscaping programming

1 main pedestrian bridge 2 playing field and pavilion

>

>

1

2

site overview

berm field cross country

The big bay site development package is a research project for

reintegrating a developing lake side community into an existing

riparian ecology outside of Hattiesburg Mississippi.

BIG BAYSITE DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE

HATTIESBURG MS

topographywatershed

built infrastructural logicsnatural infrastructural logics

generic road section

minimum reverse curves

local

collectorshoulder

berm 3:1

drain

4-5': 1/2”/ft

min 1’-6”

28-48': .4% grade

base layer

min w = 22’-26’

typical road widths min turning radius

64'

48'

20'

30'

20' min turn radius

35'

20'

34'

28'

48'

dead end

local

thoroughfare

collector

min/max lot

35' / 6500sf

min/max lot

50' / 6500sf

min/max lot

35' /3000sf

min setbacks

max

setback

1600’ /400’

1000'

min/max blockmax dead end1600' + max angle of intersection

min stopping site distance_ collector

min stopping site distance_ local

min/max lotmin/max block

2 acre strips

50’ 100’

871’

1742’

wildlife habitat allocations [ % ranges ]

min / max wildlife habitat allocations [ % ranges ]

native flora / fauna relationships by habitattypology and allocation

bq cr wt wtdr gssb glsb

20-80

5-505-20

20-50

2

% nws grass

row crop

mast hardwoods

brushy cover

cool season legumes / annual grains

10-80

5-50

10-40

20-50

2

10-30

5-50

30-60

10-30

2-5

5-30

5-50

30-60

20-40

2-530-70

50-70

<10

70-100

<10

<20

Blocks ! 2 acres or strips

! 50’ wide

Blocks ! 2acres

Blocks ! 2acres

Blocks or complexes ! 100 acres

Blocks ! 5 acres or strips

! 50’

Blocks 1 – 5 acres or strips

! 50’ wide

Grass/shrub songbirds

(field sparrow, blue

grosbeak, indigo bunting,

yellow- breasted chat)

Grassland songbirds

(grasshopper sparrow,

Henslow’s sparrow,

eastern meadowlark,

dickcissel)

Bobwhite Quail Cottontail Rabbit Wild Turkey White Tailed Deer

bq

min max min visibilitymax cover

max visibilitymin cover

min visibilitymax cover

max visibilitymin cover

nom min max nom

20

8

20

50

2

68

5

5

20

2

20

8

20

50

2

23

50

5

20

2

10

5

40

43

2 18

50

10

20

2

48

10

10

30

2

10

28

10

50

2

63

5

10

20

2

40

15

13

30

2

min visibilitymax cover

max visibilitymin cover

min max nom

10

5

60

23

2

5

50

30

10

510

28

30

30

2

30

25

30

10

5

20

40

17

20

3

min visibilitymax cover

max visibilitymin cover

min max nom

5

5

60

28

25

40

30

20

5

5

23

30

40

2

30

5

15

30

20

15

40

12

30

3

min visibilitymax cover

max visibilitymin cover

min max nom

30

1

69

10

50

40

30

10

60

49

1

50

5

60

35

min visibilitymax cover

max visibilitymin cover

min max nom

79

1

20

89

10

1

70

10

20

97

12

80

15

5

cr wt wtdr gssb glsb

wet swale generic cells

dry swale generic cellsbioswale / habitat generic section

landscape patterning conditions

mapping relationships between criticalelevationsand lot development

min 2 yr

25’

15’

15’ 15’

15’ 15’ 15’

50’

min 2 yr

min 2 yr

existing natural creek drainagecommon ara green space

redeveloped crown landscapecommon ara green space

down-slope of lot(unbuildable restriction)

down-slope of lot(unbuildable restriction)

buildable lot areaD

buildable lot areaU

road and filter

down slope raparian transition(drain to lake)

up slope transitionforrested or farmed reclamation(high drainage)

wildlife corridor / buffer

mid-slope transition

road drainage ans screen

wildlife corridor / buffer

bq

min max min visibilitymax cover

max visibilitymin cover

min visibilitymax cover

max visibilitymin cover

nom min max nom

20

8

20

50

2

68

5

5

20

2

20

8

20

50

2

23

50

5

20

2

10

5

40

43

2 18

50

10

20

2

48

10

10

30

2

10

28

10

50

2

63

5

10

20

2

40

15

13

30

2

min visibilitymax cover

max visibilitymin cover

min max nom

10

5

60

23

2

5

50

30

10

510

28

30

30

2

30

25

30

10

5

20

40

17

20

3

min visibilitymax cover

max visibilitymin cover

min max nom

5

5

60

28

25

40

30

20

5

5

23

30

40

2

30

5

15

30

20

15

40

12

30

3

min visibilitymax cover

max visibilitymin cover

min max nom

30

1

69

10

50

40

30

10

60

49

1

50

5

60

35

min visibilitymax cover

max visibilitymin cover

min max nom

79

1

20

89

10

1

70

10

20

97

12

80

15

5

cr wt wtdr gssb glsb

shallow marsh

pond_wetland system

extended detention wetland

pocket wetland

0510 1 01020304050151051010203040500.2 .1.5.81 020406080100020406080100

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

>

> minumum L / W

ratio

wetland/watershed

minimum ratio

minimum drainage

area

allocation

treatment volume

allocation

treatment area

cleanout

frequency

forebay micropool outlet

configuration

propogation

technique

buffer (ft) pondscaping

suggested

pollutant removal

capability

land factor

consumption

water

balance

tributary

watershed area

deep water

cells

native plant

diversity

wildlife habitat

potential

0.2

.01

.01

.01 target

1:1

1:1

1:1

1:1 target

25 ac

25 ac

10 ac

1-10 ac

40.60.0

70.30.0

20.30.50

20.80.0

40.60.0

70.30.0

20.30.50

20.80.0

20.40.40

45.25.30

20.35.45

10.40.50

020406080100

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

20.40.40

45.25.30

20.35.45

10.40.50

2-5 yrs

10 yrs

2-5 yrs

10 yrs

required

no

required

optional

required

required

required

optional

reverse slope

pipe

hooded broad

crest weir

reverse slope

pipe

hooded broad

crest weir

mulch

transplant

mulch

transplant

mulch

transplant

volunteer

emphasize

wildlife habitat

marsh

microtopography

buffer

high

shallow marsh

storage

moderate

verticle pools

substitute

marsh storage

moderate

verticle ED

substitute

marsh storage

moderate

malleable

in-site conditions

DA :25<+ ac

with dry weather

Q

DA :25<+ ac

with dry weather

Q

minimum 10 ac

required for

extended detention

1-10 ac

site specified

dry weather flow

normal

recommended

to maintain

water elevations

dry weather flow

normal

recommended

to maintain

water elevations

dry weather flow

normal

recommended

to maintain

water elevations

groundwater

supply

provided by

excavation

forebay

channels

micropool

pond

micropool

forebay

micropool

micropool

if possible

moderate

reliable

removal of

sediment and

nutrients

moderate > high

reliable

removal of

sediment and

nutrients

moderate

(-) reliable

removal of

sediment and

nutrients

moderate

subject to

resuspension

and groundwater

displacement

high

dependant on

microtopography

high

dependent on

sufficient wetland

complexity

moderate

fluctuating

with water levelsphysiological

low > moderate

small surface

areas

poor control

of water levels

high

complexity

buffers

high

buffer

(waterfowl)

moderate

buffer

low

small areas

low diversities

reverse slope

pipe

hooded broad

crest weir

hooded broad

crest weir

emphasize

wildlife habitat

hi marsh wedges

emphasize

stabilization of

extended detention

zones

optional

based on

capacity

01020304050

25-50

25-50

0-25

25-50

a

b

a

b

a

b

b

15.43.53

33.30.37

33.32.35

43.32.35

smooth asphalt

asphalt or concrete paving

packed clay

light turf

dense turf

dense shrubbery and forrest litter

concrete or asphalt

bare sand

graveled surface

bare clay-loam

range (natural)

bluegrass sod

short grass prairie

bermuda grass

.012

.014

.03

.2

.35

.4

.011 .01-.013

.01-.016

.012-.03

.012-.033

.01-.32

.39-.63

.01-.20

.03-.048

.01

.02

.02

.13

.45

.15

.41

.00 1.0

roughness coefficients > overland flow

allocations 01

search space

wetland mechanisms_

In most wetland treatment systems two major mechanisms are at work, liquid / solid separations

and constituent transformations. Separation methods typically include gravity separation,

filtration, absorption, adsorption, ion exchange, stripping and leaching. Transformations are

usually chemical, including reactions of oxidation and reduction, flocculation, acid/base reactions,

precipitation, and an array of biochemical reactions occuring under anaerobic, anoxic, and

aerobic conditions.

Duration of the constituents at various levels, or depths, within the system control the general

period of reactivity, and thus define the type and capacity of the wetland.

wastewater n

inorganic

organic

neutralization

necessary

biodegradeable

pretreatment

for oil and grease

removal

chemical/physical

treatment

pretreatment

strippable

contaminatesair / steam

stripping with

offgas treatment

sulfur or metals

recoverable by

precipitation coagulation

floculation

sedimentation

absorbable metal

contaminates

contains

N or P

Ion exchange

activated carbon

bioseparation

waste

destruction

biological

N or P removal

land space

avalible

oil / water

separation

trickling filter

or fixed-film

reactor

aeration

required

oil

solids recovery

required

activated sludge

aerated lagoon

anaerobic

treatment

stabilization

pond

>

typical treatment tree

shallow marsh

pond_wetland system

extended detention wetland

pocket wetland

0510 1 01020304050151051010203040500.2 .1.5.81 020406080100020406080100

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

>

>minumum L / W

ratio

wetland/watershed

minimum ratio

minimum drainage

area

allocation

treatment volume

allocation

treatment area

cleanout

frequency

forebay micropool outlet

configuration

propogation

technique

buffer (ft) pondscaping

suggested

pollutant removal

capability

land factor

consumption

water

balance

tributary

watershed area

deep water

cells

native plant

diversity

wildlife habitat

potential

0.2

.01

.01

.01 target

1:1

1:1

1:1

1:1 target

25 ac

25 ac

10 ac

1-10 ac

40.60.0

70.30.0

20.30.50

20.80.0

40.60.0

70.30.0

20.30.50

20.80.0

20.40.40

45.25.30

20.35.45

10.40.50

020406080100

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

20.40.40

45.25.30

20.35.45

10.40.50

2-5 yrs

10 yrs

2-5 yrs

10 yrs

required

no

required

optional

required

required

required

optional

reverse slope

pipe

hooded broad

crest weir

reverse slope

pipe

hooded broad

crest weir

mulch

transplant

mulch

transplant

mulch

transplant

volunteer

emphasize

wildlife habitat

marsh

microtopography

buffer

high

shallow marsh

storage

moderate

verticle pools

substitute

marsh storage

moderate

verticle ED

substitute

marsh storage

moderate

malleable

in-site conditions

DA :25<+ ac

with dry weather

Q

DA :25<+ ac

with dry weather

Q

minimum 10 ac

required for

extended detention

1-10 ac

site specified

dry weather flow

normal

recommended

to maintain

water elevations

dry weather flow

normal

recommended

to maintain

water elevations

dry weather flow

normal

recommended

to maintain

water elevations

groundwater

supply

provided by

excavation

forebay

channels

micropool

pond

micropool

forebay

micropool

micropool

if possible

moderate

reliable

removal of

sediment and

nutrients

moderate > high

reliable

removal of

sediment and

nutrients

moderate

(-) reliable

removal of

sediment and

nutrients

moderate

subject to

resuspension

and groundwater

displacement

high

dependant on

microtopography

high

dependent on

sufficient wetland

complexity

moderate

fluctuating

with water levelsphysiological

low > moderate

small surface

areas

poor control

of water levels

high

complexity

buffers

high

buffer

(waterfowl)

moderate

buffer

low

small areas

low diversities

reverse slope

pipe

hooded broad

crest weir

hooded broad

crest weir

emphasize

wildlife habitat

hi marsh wedges

emphasize

stabilization of

extended detention

zones

optional

based on

capacity

01020304050

25-50

25-50

0-25

25-50

a

b

a

b

a

b

b

15.43.53

33.30.37

33.32.35

43.32.35

smooth asphalt

asphalt or concrete paving

packed clay

light turf

dense turf

dense shrubbery and forrest litter

concrete or asphalt

bare sand

graveled surface

bare clay-loam

range (natural)

bluegrass sod

short grass prairie

bermuda grass

.012

.014

.03

.2

.35

.4

.011 .01-.013

.01-.016

.012-.03

.012-.033

.01-.32

.39-.63

.01-.20

.03-.048

.01

.02

.02

.13

.45

.15

.41

.00 1.0

roughness coefficients > overland flow

ALLOCATIONS 01

search space

wetland mechanisms_

In most wetland treatment systems two major mechanisms are at work, liquid / solid separations and constituent transformations. Separation methods typically include gravity separation, filtration, absorption, adsorption, ion exchange, stripping and leaching. Transformations are usually chemical, including reactions of oxidation and reduction, flocculation, acid/base reactions, precipitation, and an array of biochemical reactions occuring under anaerobic, anoxic, and aerobic conditions.

Duration of the constituents at various levels, or depths, within the system control the general period of reactivity, and thus define the type and capacity of the wetland.

wastewater n

inorganic

organic

neutralization

necessary

biodegradeable

pretreatment

for oil and grease

removal

chemical/physical

treatment

pretreatment

strippable

contaminatesair / steam

stripping with

offgas treatment

sulfur or metals

recoverable by

precipitation coagulation

floculation

sedimentation

absorbable metal

contaminates

contains

N or P

Ion exchange

activated carbon

bioseparation

waste

destruction

biological

N or P removal

land space

avalible

oil / water

separation

trickling filter

or fixed-film

reactor

aeration

required

oil

solids recovery

required

activated sludge

aerated lagoon

anaerobic

treatment

stabilization

pond

>

typical treatment tree

TACTILE SPECTRUMSAMPLING THE FREEWAY FIELD

HOUSTON TX

link > node

node > link

>flip

US 59

Houston TX

59

nodes links

This project redefines the infrastructural thread of US 59 as a place of cultural

exchange-a contemporary Agora-which frees the freeway from a rhetoric of rapid mass mobility, a function it haslong ceased to embody for the contemporary metropolis. Through techniques of conceptual, operational,

and physical de-lamination and re-lamination, we pull the strands of the cold-war mentality apar t and re-weave them with

the strands of the new city, the electromagnetic city. By forcing reinforced concrete open up to interaction with the

ever-thickening landscape of radio waves and digital communication, our intervention sketches critical negotiations required of a twenty-first century infrastructure.

The materialization of the multi-use radio spectrum meets the frayingof the monumental concrete slab to develop new ecosystems for our

mutating cyborg sociality.

TACTILE SPECTRUMSAMPLING THE FREEWAY FIELD

HOUSTON TX

registration fields

spatiotemporal dynamics of traffic flow states

(c) triggered stop and go traffic

(d) moving localized cluster

local network propagation

a

b

c

a :

80

b :

80

c :

80

b :

240

a :

400

RFID GPS LAN

1,5

2,4

3

from Helbing_ Kerner

traffic flow potentials

d e

n s

i t y

(a) homogeneous congested traffic

(b) oscillatory congested traffic

The traffic jam is pervasive throughout most large

American cities, with Houston ranking amongst the

worst. Studies have shown that periodic congestion

remains in spite of continual efforts to widen streets

and highways and create new ones - in the

auto-based city, the traffic jam is a permanent

condition. The regularity of this phenomenon allows

us to look at it as a destination point, with an address

and hours of operation. The social potential of

vehicular congestion already draws advertisers,

activists, and panhandlers, as well as gray-market

private vendors selling anything from newspapers to

flowers. We approach the freeway like speculative

"slum" developers, exploiting undervalued property in

anticipation of social shifts. This process projects a

possible displacement of the current site priorities, as

the proliferating "enhanced" traffic jam transforms

commuting as we know it.

matt layer 3

matt layer 2

RFIDlicense plate "MCC-670"name "David William Newton"state of residence "Arizona"age "25"make/model/year "Ford/F-150/2004"position; acceleration; velocity

GPSprojecting the city into the traffic feildGPS tagsdatabases

Bluetooth LANlocation of lan centroidsscale of lansactivity taking place in the lanstagging lan locations with GPS

cos (average velocity)

= (boolean%) sin(time)

x-y plane

y-z plane

90 %

90 %

70 %

70 %

50 %

matt layer 1

condition 1

condition 2

condition 3

condition 4

zone of propagation

1 z

2 z

3 z

4 z

5 z

6 z

7 z

8 z

9 z

10 z

1 z

2 z

3 z

4 z

5 z

6 z

7 z

8 z

9 z

10 z

1 z

2 z

3 z

4 z

5 z

6 z

7 z

8 z

9 z

10 z1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x 5 x 6 x 7 x 8 x 9 x 10 x

1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x 5 x 6 x 7 x 8 x 9 x 10 x

1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x 5 x 6 x 7 x 8 x 9 x 10 x

1011

1011

1011

1011

1011

10111011

1011

1011

1011

1011

1011

1011

study models for wall detailsoperational models

scale intersection model

intersection overview

laminar activities

study models for wall detailsoperational models

scale intersection model

intersection overviewlaminar activities

PROCESSMIXED MEDIA FROM VARIOUS PROJECTS