zws e bom2mbom discovery and recommendation process_agileec_v1 0 (2)

Zero Wait-State Company Confidential

Zero Wait-State eBoM 2 mBoM Discovery

Zero Wait-State Company Confidential Do not distribute

Introduction Tuesday – am Define Approach and Technology Review Business Model drivers with existing customer examples pm Cad Structure Agile BoM Structure

Wednesday – am Non Cad modelled parts in the Agile BoM pm Demo and Scenario/Outcome building pm Agile BoM transfer to ERP with mfg changes

discussion

Thursday - am – Flow Chart Presentation AS IS – TO BE am – Scenario/outcome Presentation

Agenda – High Level


Agenda – Wednesday pm Attendees:

Review of Wed am discussions

Overview CAD reference assembly method

Handle publish and non-published items to Agile BoM Agile Demo adding bulk items to Agile BoM after CAD

published BoM exists.

Discussion on the process with Scenario building Defining scenarios Relating outcomes to pain points discussed earlier Relating scenarios to Resources, and Business Model drivers

while identifying technical limitations Tech limitations – Related to the application’s road map

Example Detailed Agenda for each session


Approach

Resources Technology limitations Business Model

3 Agile PLM clients with differentend solutions based on above criteria

Approach - Contraints Resources – Engineering/Mfg/Doc Control

Limited manpower Technology –

Agile Single BoM Structure EC functions CAD functions XA functions

Business Model Modular Design – lends it self to CAD design

automation Manufacturing – in-house Relative Long shelf life


Approach – 3 Agile Clients Apple - Nx,Team CenterPDM,Agile,SAP

“ The BoM is structured in SAP ( ERP) based on their Apple Care program.”○ Modular – yes○ Lower shelf life○ Outsourced manufacturing


Approach – 3 Agile Clients Sun - Pro/E, Agile with EC,EBS

“ The BoM is structured for Manufacturing in CAD. Design for Mfg (DFM) They model everything – fasteners,etc.○ Modular – yes○ Mechanical Engineering resources – high○ Pro/E – Very large assembly functions

( performance)○ Medium Shelf life○ Combo of in house and outsourced mfg


Approach – 3 Agile Clients ESCO - Nx, Agile with EC, EBS

HYBRID - “ The BoM takes a partial CAD structure and components are added in Agile. ○ Modular – medium○ Some long, some short ○ In house manufacturing○ Engineering resources - limited


Day 3 Summary Presentation



New Assembly Models Created in CAD with Structure

Flat BOM Manually Derived and

Entered into Excel

Flat BOM Created in Agile PLM with Sequence Codes

Items and BOMs Released in Agile and Sent to XA

Manufacturing Uses BOM plus

Sequence Codes

CAD Sometimes Updated to Reflect

BOM Changes

BOMs and Sequence Codes Updated in Agile


As-Is Process

Engineering Initiates Changes via ‘Text’ Methods



Flat BOM Manually Derived and

Entered into Excel

Flat BOM Created in Agile PLM with Sequence Codes


Manufacturing Uses BOM plus

Sequence Codes

CAD Sometimes Updated to Reflect

BOM Changes

BOMs and Sequence Codes Updated in Agile


Pain Points

Engineering Initiates Changes via ‘Text’ Methods

?

Pain Pointsmissing

parts from solid models

complexity of sequence

codesflat BOMs,

without structure

changing part

numbers

where used visibility

too many “common”

parts

Multiple manufacturing

sites

out of date assemblies

BOM generation is tedious

assembly maintenance in SolidWorks

sorting of flat BOMs in XA



Structured BOM Created in Agile

PLM via EC


Manufacturing Uses Structured BOM

(Sequence Codes?)

CAD Models Updated to Reflect

BOM Changes

BOMs Updated in Agile PLM via EC& Manual Updates


To-Be Processmissing

parts from solid models

complexity of sequence

codesflat BOMs,

without structure

changing part

numbers

where used visibility

too many “common”

parts

Multiple manufacturing

sites

out of date assemblies

BOM generation is tedious

assembly maintenance in SolidWorks

sorting of flat BOMs in XA

Scenario Description


Approach - Contraints Resources

Limited manpower Technology

Agile Single BoM Structure EC functions SolidWorks functions XA functions

Business Model Modular Design – lends it self to CAD design

automation Manufacturing – in-house Relative Long shelf life



Scenario – CAD Assembly to BoM

Assembly Model

Agile Save

BoM in Agile

Resource Eng ↓

Resource Mfg ↓

Tech Limitations ↔

BoM not Updating with CAD Design

Manual Editing of

XLS


Scenario – NonModeled Item into BoM

Baseline BoM

BoM Redline

Complete BoM

Resource Eng ↔

Resource Mfg ↔


BoM Count Incorrect

Manual Editing of

XLS


Scenario – Design Reference Assy

Ref Assy Model

Agile Save

BoM Qty Correct

Resource Eng ↑

Resource Mfg ↓


Lost Design Effort

Manual Editing of

XLS


Scenario – Design Reference Assy

Ref Assy Model

Agile Save

Design Only

Resource Eng ↑

Resource Mfg ↓


Lost Design Effort

Manual Editing of

XLS


Scenario – CAD HelperPart Not Published

CAD Model

Agile Save

Design Only

Resource Eng ↑

Resource Mfg ↔


Unneeded Item Published

Manual Editing of

XLS


Scenario – Fasteners in CAD Assy

Fasteners in Assy

Agile Save

BoM Qty Correct

XLS Requires Extra Editing

Missing Hardware

Resource Eng ↑

Resource Mfg ↔

Tech Limitations ↑


Scenario – CAD Assy Maintained Current

Assy Chg in CAD

Agile Save

BoM Updated

Resource Eng ↑

Resource Mfg ↓


CAD Design Out of Date

Manual Editing of

XLS


Scenario – Granular Control of Configured Part

Assembly Model

Agile Save

BoM Qty Correct

Resource Eng ↔

Resource Mfg ↔


Incorrect BoM Quantity

Manual Editing of

XLS


Recommendations Review from Day 2 New ones


Recommendations: CAD Structure driving the BoM

Establish a high level assembly structure for each product line

• Allow flexibility to re-arrange structure due to mfg changes

We should establish a fast track ECO process ( CMII best practice

Existing Common parts – driven to much smaller number spares/installation kits

Manufacturing to determine component assembly order To Be: can use 3D models for work instructions

( 3D via composer)

Other Recommendations


CAD Models and Assembly Review/Super user training ZWS consultants: Dan B. or Len M.

CAD models should be used at design reviews/change mtgs Bring up the assembly/model and let’s look at it composer used for this – easier to manipulate

Have someone get CMII certified or equivalent Configuration management is at the heart of PLM

Great Brands are built from Great Products – Where are you on the spectrum?


As is Location To Be Location

Operational Excellence


Business ModelYou can buy any premierkitchen brand and bringtheir organization intoyours and drive operationalexcellence BECAUSE

You have outstanding people,processes and technology

Keep Building Digital Infrastructure

zws e bom2mbom discovery and recommendation process_agileec_v1 0 (2)

Documents

agile bom agile demo

agile items

bom assembly model agile

agile bom pm demo

pm agile bom transfer

bom changes boms

structure flat bom

structure structured