0 data through 2008 report for statewide transportation plan and business plan performance measures...

11

Data Through 2008

Report for Statewide Transportation Plan and Business Plan Performance Measures

October 2009

Report to District Engineers

Safety Safety 20092009

Prepared byThe Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology

22

TOWARD ZERO DEATHS IS WORKINGTOWARD ZERO DEATHS IS WORKING 455 FATALITIES455 FATALITIES 3 YEAR AVERAGE TRENDING DOWNWARD3 YEAR AVERAGE TRENDING DOWNWARD

NEW MEASURE FOR SERIOUS INJURIESNEW MEASURE FOR SERIOUS INJURIES TRENDS AND IMPLEMENTATION TRENDS AND IMPLEMENTATION

BARRIERSBARRIERS

SAFETY SUMMARYSAFETY SUMMARY

33

Statewide Transportation Plan Measure: Total fatalities on all state and local roads (3-year average)

Statewide Transportation Policy Plan: Policy 1: Traveler Safety

Source: Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology

Mn/DOT Target – Fatalities

Minnesota Roadway Fatalities - All State & Local RoadsResults vs. 2003 Statewide Plan and CHSP Targets 735550633600534500594559475576650657568300400500600700800 3-Year Moving Average Ends With Year Shown1-11-07 Annual Fatalities CHSP Target664684592608617623Aggressive Target Moderate TargetTrend-Based

Roadway Fatalities All State & Local Roads

568

655

455

567

625

626600

576597

494

657650

510

559

2003 Trend-based Projection

2008 Target500

2010 Target400

200

300

400

500

600

700

8001

99

5

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

Reduce Fatalitites less than 10 per year*

Reduce Fatalities by 10 to 30 per year

SHSP Target 2008

Annual Fatalities

3-Year Average

2003 Trend-based Projection

April 12, 2009

* Reduction in fatalities less than 10 per year, or if fatalities exceed target after 3 years.

44

Mn/DOT Target - SERIOUS INJURIESMn/DOT Target - SERIOUS INJURIES

• “A” injuries continue to trend downward.

• New Measure proposed for serious injuries – less than 1200 serious injuries by 2010

• Aggressive target – requires a 15% reduction in serious injury crashes

Serious Injuries

2,949

1,8441,736

1,553

3,460

3,174

2,019

2,424

2,7722,807

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Year

Ser

iou

s In

juri

es

Trend-based Projection Actual Serious Injuries

Trend-based Projection

2010 Target1200

55

NATIONAL COMPARISONNATIONAL COMPARISON LEADER STATISTICALLYLEADER STATISTICALLY

Met National Goal of less than 1.0 fatalities per Met National Goal of less than 1.0 fatalities per 100MVM100MVM

22ndnd Best safety performance in the nation Best safety performance in the nation (AASHTO 2009 Cooperative Performance (AASHTO 2009 Cooperative Performance Measurement – Safety Report)Measurement – Safety Report)

FOLLOWER LEGISLATIVELYFOLLOWER LEGISLATIVELY Negatives – Repeat Offender, Helmet LawsNegatives – Repeat Offender, Helmet Laws Positives – Primary Seat Belt, Booster Seats, Positives – Primary Seat Belt, Booster Seats,

Texting, Graduated Drivers License, .08 BACTexting, Graduated Drivers License, .08 BAC DOING SOMETHING RIGHTDOING SOMETHING RIGHT

66

Regional Fatality Rates and FatalitiesRegional Fatality Rates and Fatalities

Analysis/Comments

• Midwest states generally lower fatality rate than national average (1.27)

• Minnesota typically has one of the 10 lowest fatality rates

• Minnesota had the fourth lowest fatality rate nationwide in 2007. The top five were MA (.79), RI (.80), VT (.86), MN (.89), and CT (.92).

1.42 (104)

1.62 (119)

1.32 (208)

0.87(455)

1.43 (412)

1.22 (724)

1.16 (1043)

1.26 (814)

1.04 (980)

Fatality Rate = Fatalities per 100 Million Vehicle Miles Traveled

2008 National Average = 1.27 Fatalities / 100 MVM

Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

NOTE: Fatalities are 2008 data and fatality rates are 2007 data.

77

TOWARD ZERO DEATHSTOWARD ZERO DEATHS

TZD IS THE UMBRELLA FOR ALL TZD IS THE UMBRELLA FOR ALL SAFETY PROGRAMSSAFETY PROGRAMS

TZD STRATEGIC DIRECTIONTZD STRATEGIC DIRECTION PARTNERSHIPSPARTNERSHIPS CONFERENCESCONFERENCES ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

88

SHSPSHSP APPROVED IN JULY 2007APPROVED IN JULY 2007 INTERAGENCY WORKING GROUPINTERAGENCY WORKING GROUP VERIFIED KEY COMPONENTS OF VERIFIED KEY COMPONENTS OF

ORIGINAL PLAN USING NEWER DATAORIGINAL PLAN USING NEWER DATA DEVELOPED IMPLEMENTATION DEVELOPED IMPLEMENTATION

GUIDELINES FOR EACH ATPGUIDELINES FOR EACH ATP USED TO SELECT PROJECTS FOR USED TO SELECT PROJECTS FOR

2009 & BEYOND2009 & BEYOND

99

Crash, Fatality, Miles of Roadway, Vehicle-Miles Crash, Fatality, Miles of Roadway, Vehicle-Miles Traveled Comparison by JurisdictionTraveled Comparison by Jurisdiction

Trunk Highway (01-03)County (04,07)Municipal (0,10)Other (08-09, 11-23)

Analysis/Comments

•87% of Fatalities occur on the State and County System

•Municipal system: very few fatalities compared to % of total crashes (transferred to THs)

• THs have 8% of miles, but 58% of VMT

• “Other” category makes up very large % of miles but very low % of other data. Includes frontage roads, township roads, park roads, forest roads, military roads, private roads open to the public, etc.

2008 Vehicle Miles Comparison

58%24%

16%2%

2006-2008 Fatality Comparison

36%

51%

5%8%

2006-2008 Crash Comparison

42%28%

2%

28%

2008 Miles of Roadway Comparison

32%44%

8%

16%

1010

2008 Rural vs. Urban Comparison

Analysis/Comments

•11% of Greater MN fatal crashes are Urban

•75% of Metro District fatal crashes are Urban

Fatal Crashes Metro District All Roads

Rural34

Crashes25%

Urban101

Crashes75%

Statewide Fatal Crashes All Roads

Urban133

Crashes32%

Rural286

Crashes68%

Fatal CrashesNon-State Roads

Urban66

Crashes32%

Rural142

Crashes68%

Fatal Crashes Greater MN All Roads

Rural252

Crashes89%

Urban32

Crashes11%

1111Source: Mn/DOT Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology

3-year average is plotted on last year of 3-year period

Analysis/Comments

• 2-Lane Trunk Highways: 80% of TH miles, 50% TH fatalities, 30% of TH traffic

Fatalities State Trunk Highways

* 2-Lane includes private roads, 3-lane roadways, 1-way roads and all other misc. roadways (<2% of total 2-lane roadways)

TH Fatalities by Road Design 06-08Statewide

4-Lane Undivided

5%

4-Lane Divided

24%

2-Lane*50% Interstate

21%

TH Fatalities by Road Design TypeStatewide

62 65 61 5953 51

8290

8377

6863

17 13 12 11 14 15

159153

159 156

140

126

5358

59

81

1219

123

162

0

30

60

90

120

150

180

99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08

Interstate 4-Lane Divided4-Lane Undivided 2-Lane*

1212

Statewide Fatal + A Crashes by Diagram

Statewide - 2006-08 TH Fatal + A Crashes

Rear End13%

Left Turn3%

Right Angle23%

Head On14%

Run Off Road Right17%

Side Swipe Opposing

2%

Unknown13%

Side Swipe Passing3%

Run Off Road Left12%

1313

Fatalities All RoadsFatalities All Roads

Fatalities by System 06-08Statewide

TH51%

CSAH32%

MSAS5%

Other12%

Analysis/Comments

• TH vs. local system fatalities ~50 / 50 split – importance of partnering

Source: Mn/DOT Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology

Fatalities by SystemStatewide

315319

246

320 322303

274256

189199 203 212 187

167160 153

252728 24 26 25 25 25

69 68 72 74 78 74 67 60

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08

THCSAHMSASOther

1414

Statewide FatalitiesStatewide Fatalities

Fatalities Percentage

Emphasis Area

Fatality Rank Fatalities Percentage

Emphasis Area

Fatality Rank

Total Fatalities 3,008 2,581

Total Vehicle Occupant Fatalities 2,429 2,363

Driver Behavior Based Emphasis Areas

Unbelted (Based on Veh. Occ. Fatalities) 1,271 52% 1 1,003 42% 1

Alcohol-Related 1,068 36% 2 893 35% 2

Speeding Related 850 28% 5 704 27% 5

Involved Drivers under 21 718 24% 6 506 20% 7

Infrastructure Based Emphasis Areas

Single Vehicle ROR 965 32% 4 813 32% 4

Intersection 1,004 33% 3 856 33% 3

Head-On and Sideswipe 611 20% 7 543 21% 6

2004-20082001-2005

1515

Minnesota Safety Belt use Responds to Minnesota Safety Belt use Responds to LegislationLegislation

•The usage rate is the ratio of estimated time on the road that front seat occupants are using safety belts to the total estimated time on the road for these occupants

Seat Belt Usage(by observation)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Year of Study

Pe

rce

nt

of

Us

ag

e b

y t

ime

on

ro

ad

wa

y

Overall SE Observational Study

19

86

Se

co

nd

ary

Se

at

Be

lt L

aw

Pa

ss

ed

June 1986

August 1986

19

93

Se

at

Be

lt F

ine

In

cre

as

ed

to

$2

5

19

88

$1

0 S

ea

t B

elt

Fin

e A

dd

ed

19

95

Sa

fe &

So

be

r C

am

pa

ign

1982 Child Passenger Protection Act

2009 Primary Seat Belt Law Passed

1616

Minnesota Impaired Driving Fatalities

178

273

195

245

211

239

255

177

197

166

190

163

39%37%

36%34%

35%

31%

36%37%39%

31%

42%

30%

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Year

Fat

alit

ies

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

Per

cen

t o

f al

l F

atal

itie

s

MN Alcohol Related Fatalities by Year Percent of all Fatalities

1717

Speed Related CrashesSpeed Related CrashesSpeed Related Crashes

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

19

84

19

85

19

86

19

87

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

Year

# o

f F

ata

l an

d A

In

jury

Cra

sh

es

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

# o

f A

ll I

n j

ury

an

d T

ota

l C

ras

hes

FAT

INJ-A

INJ-TOT

TOTAL

1818

Crash Trends involving Underage Crash Trends involving Underage DriversDrivers

Underage Drivers involved in Fatal Crashes

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Year

Dri

vers

15 16 17 18 19 20

Underage Drivers Involved in Serious Injury Crashes

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Year

Dri

vers

15 16 17 18 19 20

2020

Lane Departure TrendsLane Departure Trends

Fatal and Serious Injury Lane Departure Crashes on State Roads

y = -6.5152x + 320.53

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Year

Fatal and Serious Injury Lane Departure Crashes on Local Roads

y = -19.624x + 612.33

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Year

• Local roads have a steeper reduction than State roads over the last 10 years

2121

Fatal Crashes by Number of Vehicles

R2 = 0.1778

R2 = 0.8515

R2 = 0.1405

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Year

Fata

l Cra

shes

Single Vehicle Crashes 2-Vehicle Crashes 3-Vehicle Crashes

Linear (Single Vehicle Crashes) Linear (2-Vehicle Crashes) Linear (3-Vehicle Crashes)

2222

Pedestrian & Bicycle Fatalities

56

51

44

38

33

14

4

25

37

5250

46

41

58

7

13

87

98

7 76

10

8.6%

8.1%

6.6%

8.1%

7.6%7.9%

6.5%

7.9%

6.5%

1.4% 1.3%

2.2%

1.2% 1.1% 0.9%

1.8%

1.3%

0.8%

9.7%

5.5%

7.7%

1.2%

2.9%

1.6%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Fa

tali

tie

s

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

Pedestrian Bike

Pedestrian Percentage Bike Percentage

2323

1968 Universal helmet law covering all riders1968 Universal helmet law covering all riders 1977 Coverage reduced to 17 and younger and instruction permit holders1977 Coverage reduced to 17 and younger and instruction permit holders Males account for 82% of all motorcyclists killed or injured. In 2008, of 72 motorcycles killed 62 Males account for 82% of all motorcyclists killed or injured. In 2008, of 72 motorcycles killed 62

were males.were males. Half of motorcycle crashes are single vehicle crashes. Of those crashes, illegal or unsafe speed Half of motorcycle crashes are single vehicle crashes. Of those crashes, illegal or unsafe speed

(22%) and driver inexperience (17%) are sited most often.(22%) and driver inexperience (17%) are sited most often.

Minnesota Motorcycle Fatalities

0

50

100

150

200

250

19

80

19

81

19

82

19

83

19

84

19

85

19

86

19

87

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

(does not include non-cycle rider fatalities)F

ata

liti

es

Fatalities Registered Motorcycles (in 1000's)

2424

APPENDIXAPPENDIX

DATA AND FIGURES BY ATPDATA AND FIGURES BY ATP

2525

Analysis/Comments 60% of trunk highway fatalities are concentrated in Metro, D3 and D6. Statewide Transportation Plan measure sets a long-range target to reduce the absolute number of fatalities. Reduction in rural 2-lane fatalities essential to long-term targets

Source: Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology.Note: The legal threshold for reporting a crash went up from $500 to $1000 on August 1, 1994.

Mn/DOT Target – FatalitiesT.H. ATP Comparison by Road Design 2006-2008

% of TH Fatalities by ATP by Road Design 2006-2008 3 Year Annual Average

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

ATP 1 ATP 2 ATP 3 ATP 4 METRO ATP ATP 6 ATP 7 ATP 8

2-Lane4-Lane Undivided4-Lane DividedISTH

2626

Statewide Measure: Number of roadway fatalities (3-year annual average).

Statewide Targets: Reduce fatalities to 600 by 2023 (– 0.26% per year).

Fatalities - Metro

Fatalities by System 06-08Metro ATP

TH51%CSAH

30%

MSAS11%

Other8%

TH Fatalities by Road Design METRO ATP

Interstate 4-Lane Divided

4-Lane Undivided

2-Lane*

0

10

20

30

40

50

99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08

TH Fatalities by Road Design 06-08Metro ATP

2-Lane*24%

Interstate36%

4-Lane Divided33%4-Lane

Undivided7%

99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08TH 87 99 103 96 84 77 75 81

CSAH 55 57 56 61 58 55 51 47MSAS 20 19 17 17 20 19 19 17Other 19 18 21 19 21 15 13 13

TOTAL 181 193 197 193 183 166 159 157

Metro 99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08Interstate 34 37 37 32 27 26 26 294-Lane Divided 30 34 39 36 34 29 27 274-Lane Undivided 7 8 5 4 3 5 6 62-Lane* 15 20 22 25 21 17 16 19

TOTAL 87 99 103 96 84 77 75 81

Fatalities by System Metro ATP

State Trunk Highway

CSAH

MSAS

Other

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08

2727

Metro ATP Fatal + A Crashes by Diagram

METRO ATP - 2006-08 TH Fatal + A Crashes

Rear End17%

Left Turn4%

Right Angle18%



Head On12%

Unknown18%


Side Swipe Opposing

1%

2828

Fatalities - ATP 1 Statewide Measure: Number of roadway fatalities (3-year annual average).


99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08TH 33 35 36 35 35 33 30 28

CSAH 20 21 19 20 17 14 14 11MSAS 1 2 3 2 2 1 1 2Other 4 5 8 9 8 5 5 6

TOTAL 58 63 66 66 61 53 50 47

Fatalities by System 06-08ATP 1

TH59%

CSAH24%

MSAS5%

Other12%

ATP 1 99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08Interstate 4 5 6 5 4 5 5 54-Lane Divided 7 8 8 6 5 5 4 44-Lane Undivided 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 12-Lane* 19 19 20 22 24 22 19 19

TOTAL 33 35 36 35 35 33 30 30

TH Fatalities by Road Design 06-08ATP 1

2-Lane*64%

Interstate18%

4-Lane Divided14%

4-Lane Undivided

4%

TH Fatalities by Road DesignATP 1

Interstate4-Lane Divided

4-Lane Undivided

2-Lane*

0

10

20

30

99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08

Fatalities by SystemATP 1

CSAH

State Trunk Highway

MSAS

Other

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08

2929

ATP 1 Fatal + A Crashes by Diagram

ATP 1 - 2006-08 TH Fatal + A Crashes

Unknown12%Side Swipe Passing

1%

Side Swipe Opposing

3%

Head On20%


Right Angle25%

Left Turn2%

Rear End9%


3030

Fatalities - District 2Statewide Measure: Number of roadway fatalities (3-year annual average).



TH45%

CSAH44%

MSAS1%

Other10%

99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08TH 21 19 17 16 13 12 12 11

CSAH 11 15 15 16 12 12 10 11MSAS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.33Other 5 4 3 3 6 6 6 3

TOTAL 37 38 35 36 31 31 28 26


TOTAL 21 19 17 16 13 12 12 12TH Fatalities by Road Design 06-08

ATP 2

2-Lane*67%

4-Lane Undivided

8%

4-Lane Divided25%


4-Lane Divided

4-Lane Undivided

0

10

20

99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08

2-Lane*


State Trunk Highway

CSAH

0

5

10

15

20

25

99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08

Other

3131




Run Off RoadRight24%

Head On8%

Unknown10%

Rear End8%

Left Turn7%

Right Angle29%

3232




2-Lane*62%

Interstate6%

4-LaneDivided

30%4-Lane

Undivided4%


TOTAL 54 59 55 57 55 49 43 36

Fatalities by System 06-08 ATP 3

TH45%

MSAS1%

CSAH34%

Other20%

99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08TH 54 58 54 56 55 49 43 36

CSAH 34 40 45 43 40 34 32 28MSAS 2 1 1 1 2 3 2 1Other 14 15 17 18 19 17 18 17

TOTAL 104 114 117 118 115 103 94 81


Interstate

4-Lane Divided

4-Lane Undivided

2-Lane*

0

10

20

30

40

99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08


State Trunk Highway

CSAH

MSAS

Other

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08

3333



Run Off Road Right21% Run Off Road Left

8%

Right Angle27%

Rear End11% Left Turn

2%

Unknown11%

Side Swipe Opposing

2%


Head On17%

3434



99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08TH 25 24 25 25 24 19 20 19

CSAH 17 17 15 16 11 10 10 14MSAS 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1Other 7 8 6 6 6 7 6 4

TOTAL 49 50 47 48 41 37 37 38


TH50%

CSAH36%

MSAS3%

Other11%


TOTAL 25 24 25 25 24 19 20 19TH Fatalities by Road Design 06-08

ATP 4

2-Lane*76%

Interstate17%

4-Lane Divided7%


Interstate4-Lane Divided

4-Lane Undivided

2-Lane*

0

5

10

15

20

99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08


State Trunk Highway

CSAH

MSAS

Other

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08

3535





Side Swipe Opposing

5%

Head On14%


Unknown10%

Rear End10%

Left Turn1%

Right Angle24%

3636




2-Lane*44%

Interstate30%

4-Lane Divided25%

4-Lane Undivided

1%


TOTAL 50 45 46 45 41 39 36 37

99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08TH 50 45 46 45 41 39 36 37

CSAH 23 22 22 23 22 19 17 18MSAS 4 4 2 2 1 0 1 2Other 9 9 9 9 10 10 8 6

TOTAL 86 80 79 79 73 67 61 63


CSAH29%

MSAS3%

TH58%

Other10%


Interstate

4-Lane Divided

4-Lane Undivided

2-Lane*

0

10

20

30

99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08


State Trunk Highway

CSAH

MSAS

Other

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08

3737




Head On14%


Side Swipe Opposing

2%

Side Swipe Passing2% Unknown

8%Rear End

10% Left Turn3%

Right Angle26%

3838




MSAS3%

CSAH36%

TH48%

Other13%

99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08TH 23 20 21 20 26 22 21 18

CSAH 14 14 16 14 12 9 13 13MSAS 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1Other 6 5 5 5 4 5 5 5

TOTAL 43 40 43 40 42 37 39 37


TOTAL 23 19 20 20 26 22 21 18


4-Lane Undivided

7%

4-Lane Divided16%

Interstate13%

2-Lane*64%

TH Fatalities by Road Design ATP 7

Interstate

4-Lane Divided

4-Lane Undivided

2-Lane*

0

5

10

15

20

99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08


State Trunk Highway

CSAH

MSAS

Other

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08

3939




Side Swipe Opposing

3%

Head On15%



Unknown7%

Rear End13% Left Turn

1%

Right Angle27%

4040




4-Lane Divided6%

4-Lane Undivided

6%

2-Lane*88%


TOTAL 27 20 20 22 25 23 19 16


TH47%

MSAS2%

CSAH32%

Other19%

99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08TH 27 20 20 22 25 23 19 16

CSAH 13 13 14 18 15 14 14 11MSAS 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1Other 6 5 4 4 5 8 7 7

TOTAL 46 38 39 45 46 45 41 34

TH Fatalities by Road Design ATP 8

4-Lane Divided 4-Lane Undivided

0

10

20

30

99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08

2-Lane*


State Trunk Highway

CSAH

MSAS

Other

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08

4141



Head On19%

Side Swipe Opposing

4%



Unknown7%

Rear End9%

Left Turn1%

Right Angle31%

Run Off Road Left7%

4242

Fatalities on Trunk Highways 3-Year Average

STATE 99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08Interstate 58 62 65 61 59 53 51 534-Lane Divided 81 82 90 83 77 68 63 594-Lane Undivided 19 17 13 12 11 14 15 122-Lane* 162 159 153 159 156 140 126 123

TOTAL 319 320 322 315 303 274 256 246

* 2-Lane includes private roads, 3-lane roadways, 1-way roads and all other misc. roadways (<2% of total 2-lane roadways)

Metro 99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08Interstate 34 37 37 32 27 26 26 294-Lane Divided 30 34 39 36 34 29 27 274-Lane Undivided 7 8 5 4 3 5 6 62-Lane* 15 20 22 25 21 17 16 19

TOTAL 87 99 103 96 84 77 75 81


TOTAL 33 35 36 35 35 33 30 30


TOTAL 21 19 17 16 13 12 12 12


TOTAL 54 59 55 57 55 49 43 36


TOTAL 25 24 25 25 24 19 20 19


TOTAL 50 45 46 45 41 39 36 37


TOTAL 23 19 20 20 26 22 21 18


TOTAL 27 20 20 22 25 23 19 16

0 data through 2008 report for statewide transportation plan and business plan performance measures...

Documents

th fatalities

total fatalities

urban slide

technology slide

right slide

national average

traveler safety source

nd best safety performance