07_benefits of rapid deployment of refinery wide model_gautam
DESCRIPTION
Benefits of Rapid Deployment of Refinery Wide ModelTRANSCRIPT
Using Engineering Simulations to Sustain Refining Profit Margins
Gautam Pradhan, Sr. Principal Business Consultant
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 2 © 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 2
Agenda
• Why use Engineering Simulations in Refining?
• What is HYSYS® Petroleum Refining?
– Improved Components
– Petroleum Properties
– Assay Management
– Reactors
– Refinery Wide Models
– Planning and Scheduling Support
– Benefits of Refinery Wide Models
– Success Stories
• Demos
– Crude distillation with improved properties and assays
– Refinery Reactors (FCC, Reformer)
– Refinery Wide Models
– Planning and Scheduling Support
• Q & A
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 3
Why Use Engineering Simulations in Refining?
• What do you tell the refinery manager in one minute?
– How does it make money for the refining owner/operator?
• Engineering simulations are used to predict yields and properties
– Predicts how to turn crude oil into products which is the main business of refining
– If you don’t use simulations, you are guessing about key decisions for feed stocks and operating
conditions
– Simulations can play a key role in refinery profit margin analysis
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 4
How to Use Engineering Simulations
• Planning and scheduling support (Aspen PIMS and Aspen Petroleum Scheduler)
– Shared assays allow Engineering models to validate PIMS predictions of CDU performance
– Engineering simulations improve PIMS assay table and reactor submodel accuracy
– Refinery wide engineering model partners with PIMS for more accurate decisions
• Standalone unit models (crude distillation and reactors)
– Predict changing feed stocks
– Predict changing catalysts (FCC, semi-regen reformer)
– Optimize plant set points
– reactor temperatures, column cut points
– Equipment revamp studies
• Multi-unit and refinery wide models
– Predict gasoline or diesel production train
– Predict new refinery configurations
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 5
aspenONE® Engineering focused on process engineering and optimization
The refining “branch”
HYSYS® Petroleum Refining
focused on margin analysis
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 6
Refining Features Predict Yields and Properties
Aspen HYSYS®
Aspen HYSYS® Petroleum Refining (RefSYS)
Refining Components
Petroleum Properties
Assay Management
Refinery Reactors
Multi-unit Simulation
PIMS & APS Support
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 7
Traditional Hypos (Pseudo-components) Produced by HYSYS Oil Manager
Crude - 1
Crude - 2
Crude Feed after
Mixer
• Each feed has a separate set of hypos
• Flowsheet stream compositions are awkward combination of all feed hypos
• Hard to manage yields and properties across the flowsheet
• Hypo properties cannot change in flowsheet
36-40*
40-50*
---*
200-210*
210-220*
----*
450-460*
460-480*
480-500*
----*
580-600*
600-650*
650-700*
700+*
Crude Oil Mixer
36-40*
40-50*
---*
200-210*
210-220*
----*
450-460*
460-480*
480-500*
----*
580-600*
600-650*
650-700*
700+*
36-40*
40-50*
---*
200-210*
210-220*
----*
450-460*
460-480*
480-500*
----*
580-600*
600-650*
650-700*
700+*
36-40*
40-50*
---*
200-210*
210-220*
----*
450-460*
460-480*
480-500*
----*
580-600*
600-650*
650-700*
700+*
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 8
Aspen HYSYS® Petroleum Refining Hypos Produced by Assay Manager
Crude - 1
Crude - 2
Crude Feed after
Mixer
• Feed share the same hypos
• Flowsheet uses a single set of hypos
• Easier to manage yields and properties across flowsheet
• Hypo properties change in the flowsheet.
36-40*
40-50*
---*
200-210*
210-220*
----*
450-460*
460-480*
480-500*
----*
580-600*
600-650*
650-700*
700+*
36-40*
40-50*
---*
200-210*
210-220*
----*
450-460*
460-480*
480-500*
----*
580-600*
600-650*
650-700*
700+*
36-40*
40-50*
---*
200-210*
210-220*
----*
450-460*
460-480*
480-500*
----*
580-600*
600-650*
650-700*
700+*
Crude Oil Mixer
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 9
Petroleum Properties A Complete Set is Available for Hypos and Streams
Over 50 Petroleum Properties
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 10
How Can AspenTech Help Refineries Maximize Profits?
Sustain Profit Margins by ensuring planning models are up to date.
Maximize Profit Margins from rigorous profit margin analysis.
Integration of Aspen PIMS® and Aspen HYSYS ® allows
• Quick development of an ‘Easy to Use’ Refinery Wide Process Model for
Margin Analysis
• Easier updates of Aspen PIMS Planning Models using Aspen HYSYS
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 11
Aspen Assay Manager
Process Engineers and Planners Share Assays
Lab Data
Assay Manager
Components for Aspen HYSYS® Petroleum Refining
Main and Swing Cuts for Aspen PIMS
Share Assays with .AFAM file
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 12
Crude Distillation Model Support HYSYS® Petroleum Refining used to Calibrate Assay Manager Fractionation Effects
Plant data
HYSYS® Petroleum Refining Model
Fractionation Effects
PIMS Assay Manager Main and Swing Cuts
Accurate representation of non-ideal separation achieved through integration of
Engineering and Planning Distillation Models
Cut points and Fractionation
Factors (SI Factors) PIMS Assay Table
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 13
Crude Distillation (CDU) Support: Two Steps
• Step 1: Yields (Cut Points)
– Use HYSYS® Petroleum Refining model to get product cut points
– Cut points define the yields used in PIMS Assay Tables
• Step 2: Properties (SI Factors)
– Use HYSYS® Petroleum Refining model to get fractionation factors (SI factors) that match plant
product overlaps
– Use fractionation factors to improve property predictions that are sensitive to fractionator overlap
like cloud point and sulfur.
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 14
Aspen HYSYS Petroleum Refining Model for Cut Points and SI Factors
Blend CDU products
to get crude assay
PIMS LP crude
model in HYSYS
Petroleum Refining
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 15
Fractionation Model Provides Fractionation Factors (“SI Factors”) for Product Overlaps
SI Factors for PIMS Main and Swing Cuts
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 16
Cut points and SI Factors In PIMS Assay Manager
Used to Cut New Main and Swing Cuts
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 17
Aspen HYSYS® Petroleum Refining Reactors
Gas Processing
Naphtha Hydrotreater
Kerosene Hydrotreater
Isomerization
Catalytic Reformer
Hydrocracker
Alkylation
Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC)
Delayed Coker
Atm
osp
heri
c D
isti
llati
on
Vacu
um
Dis
tillati
on
Pro
du
ct
Ble
nd
ing
Visbreaker
Diesel Hydrotreater
GasOil Hydrotreater
Resid Hydrotreater Di-Olefin HDTR
Selective HDS
Cat. Gas. Hydrotreater
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 18
Aspen HYSYS® Petroleum Refining Reactors Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC)
Select FCC from palette and place on flowsheet.
Model is reactor and regenerator with heat balance.
Feed and reactions based on 21 lumps.
Reactor can be one or two risers with dilute phase.
Regenerator can be one or two stage.
Model contains calibration for matching plant data.
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 19
Aspen HYSYS® Petroleum Refining Reactors Naphtha Reforming (Reformer)
Select Reformer from palette and place on flowsheet.
Model is reactor beds and recycle gas system.
Feed and reactions based on 50 lumps.
Reactor can be three to six beds.
Model options include semi-regenerative and continuous.
Model contains calibration for matching plant data.
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 20
Aspen HYSYS® Petroleum Refining Reactors Isomerization (C4/C5/C6)
Select Isomerization from palette and place on flowsheet.
Model is standalone reactor bed. Use two reactors for lead and lag reactor systems.
Feed and reactions based on 50 lumps.
Supports C4/C5/C6 isomerization.
Normally used in flowsheet with reformer.
Default kinetics may need manual calibration to match plant.
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 21
Aspen HYSYS® Petroleum Refining Reactors Heavy Oil Hydroprocessing (HYSYS Hydrocracker)
Select Hydrocracker from palette and place on flowsheet.
Model is reactors and recycle gas system.
Feed and reactions based on 97 lumps.
Each reactor can be one to six beds.
Hydrotreating and hydrocracking are modelled.
Feeds can be distillate, gas oils or resids.
Model contains calibration for matching plant data.
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 22
Aspen HYSYS® Petroleum Refining Reactors Naphtha (Light Oil) Hydroprocessing (NHT and CGH)
Select hydrotreater from palette and place on flowsheet.
Three reactors are available.
1. NHT reactor is for treating reformer feed
2. Cat Gas SHU is for FCC naphtha selective hydrotreating
3. Cat Gas HDS is for FCC naphtha desulfurization
Each reactor is a standalone bed
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 23
Aspen HYSYS® Petroleum Refining Reactors Thermal Cracking (Delayed Coker and Visbreaker)
Select from palette and place on flowsheet.
Feed and reactions based on 37 lumps.
Coker is feed heater with drum.
Visbreaker is feed heater with optional soaker.
Model contains calibration for matching plant data.
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 24
Aspen HYSYS® Petroleum Refining Reactors Alkylation (H2SO4 and HF)
Select from palette and place on flowsheet.
Feed and reactions based on 49 lumps.
Models for H2SO4 and HF.
Models are standalone reactors.
User adds IC4 recycle and fractionation system.
Model contains calibration for matching plant data.
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 25
Aspen HYSYS® Petroleum Refining Reactors Short Cut Reactor (PIMS Reactor LP Submodel)
Select from palette and place on flowsheet.
Short cut reactor model based on PIMS reactor LP submodel.
Uses “Base & Delta” LP method
Reduces complexity in multi-unit or refinery wide models by replacing rigorous reactor models
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 26
Reactor Support Process Data from Aspen HYSYS® Petroleum Refining Drives Aspen PIMS Submodel Coefficient Formulas
Case Study Output from HYSYS Petroleum Refining transfers to
PIMS Submodel sheet
Process data table drives submodel coefficients
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 27
Refineries Run on Tight Profit Margins
Profit Margin Analysis is CRUCIAL
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 28
Challenge with rigorous refinery wide model
Very Cumbersome Models
Long Time to Develop
Long Run Time to Converge
Demands High Expertise to Develop and Use Models
Keeps Refineries DEPENDENT on Expensive Consultants to Make and Use these Models
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 29
Aspen Tech’s Solution
Leverage the Integration between Aspen PIMS & Aspen HYSYS to
Reproduce the refinery wide
PIMS Model in Aspen HYSYS
Selectively upgrade rigorous sub model units
Use the Refinery wide Model to find
ways to boost profit
A Refinery wide model that is a ‘mix of shortcut and rigorous sub-models’ keeps it
Manageable and Accurate!
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 30
Refinery wide model can be used to
Pin down specific process areas for profit improvement
Come out with alternative improvement plans
Predict impact of each alternative on refinery profit
1
2
3
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 31
So the gist of it is….
We can Deliver a Refinery wide model which is
• Easier and faster to develop
• Accurate
• Much faster to run
when compared to our competitors.
Refineries can maximize profits from analysis using refinery wide process model.
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 32
Solution Overview
Business Challenge & Objective Results & Benefits Business Challenge & Objective
Solution Overview
Results & Benefits
• Aspen HYSYS Petroleum Refining (RefSYS) to model
multiple units including crude distillation and reactor units.
• Aspen HYSYS (RefSYS) Reformer model improved LP
models for Aspen PIMS and Aspen Petroleum Scheduler
(Orion).
• Aspen HYSYS (RefSYS) CatCracker model helped to plan
plant operating strategy and update the RefSYS/LP model.
• Aspen HYSYS Petroleum Refining (RefSYS) incorporates
plant data to calibrate reactor models.
CASE STUDY: Taiyo Oil Company Ltd.
Refinery margin improvement
• Data available in timely manner improves crude selection.
• Model enabled profitable operation from the startup.
• Continuous review and update of the RefSYS/LP model increased profitability.
• A 12.7% profit increase reported for the refinery.
• The complex business and operational challenges for
refinery planning and scheduling.
• Improving the accuracy of yield in scheduling.
• Understanding RFCC behavior for improving operational
constraints.
Ref: Koichi Takeda, Taiyo Oil Co. Ltd.,
AspenTech Global Conference: OPTIMIZE 2011, Washington, D.C., May 2011
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 33
Solution Overview
Business Challenge & Objective Results & Benefits
Hydrocracking model to support crude selection process
Business Challenge & Objective
Solution Overview
Results & Benefits
• Aspen HYSYS Petroleum Refining used to simulate the entire
complex.
• Aspen HYSYS Hydrocracker to simulate multiple reactor
units.
• Aspen Simulation Workbook (ASW) for input data and link to
BP’s Excel-based LP vector generation tool (Autovec) for
Aspen PIMS.
• Uncertainty analysis performed with Deterministic Equivalent
Modeling Method (DEMM).
CASE STUDY: BP
• Update refinery site heat and mass balance.
• Unit health monitoring of yields and catalyst bed activity.
• Production and planning support for crude selection.
• Identifying Hydrocracking model uncertainties and
performance gaps.
• Crude Selection: Model used to assess
alternative crudes at a BP site for
benefits of $20+ million by processing
these opportunity crudes
• Planning Support: Margin improvements
from LP submodel updates and other
process changes:
– $71,000 per day summer
– $57,000 per day winter
• Other process modeling projects to
support operations.
– Refinery heat and weight balances
– Unit health monitoring
– Revamps and new unit evaluation
Ref: Bruce Briggs, et. al., BP Refining Technology,
AspenTech Global Conference: OPTIMIZE
2011,Washington, D.C., May 2011; and AspenTech
Webinar: Improve Refinery Margins with
Hydroprocessing Models, Jan 2012.
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 34
Success Story : GS Caltex Applications of CCR Models
Notes:
• This was “molecular management” project to introduce “molecules” into PIMS to drive
feedstock selection for BTX production
• Old PIMS used reformer shift vectors like N=2A
• New PIMS used reformer shift vectors based on BTX precursors like MCP.
• These molecules were added to PIMS assay tables to drive shift vectors in four reformer
submodels for the four reformers in the plant
• RefSYS reformer was used to develop the submodel data for all four reformers.
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 35
Challenge Solution Result
GS Caltex Planning and scheduling model updates
Challenge
Objective: Improve refinery margins
Improve planning model for increased planning accuracy of aromatics complex
Better prediction of aromatic yields
Ref: Y-J Shin, GS Caltex,
AspenTech User Conference, Berlin, April 2008
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 36
Challenge Solution Result
GS Caltex Planning and scheduling model updates
Aspen HYSYS Petroleum Refining, Crude Manager (for assays), Reformer model, ASW (with link to Aspen PIMS)
Aspen HYSYS Petroleum Refining model of 4 crude units and 4 catalytic reformers
Ref: Y-J Shin, GS Caltex,
AspenTech User Conference, Berlin, April 2008
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 37
Challenge Solution Result
GS Caltex Planning and scheduling model updates
Significantly improved predictive capability
Model now predicts more accurate yields (within 99% accuracy vs. 97.5% before)
Better visibility into feedstock selection options
Optimized product quality for units downstream of reformer
Ref: Y-J Shin, GS Caltex,
AspenTech User Conference, Berlin, April 2008
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 38
Challenge Solution Result
CEPSA Rigorous reactor modeling for operations and capital projects
Challenge
Quick and accurate assessment of opportunities to improve FCC performance and refinery margins:
– Revamps and other capital projects
– New catalyst selection
– New feedstock scenario
– LP planning model updates
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 39
Challenge Solution Result
CEPSA Rigorous reactor modeling for operations and capital projects
Aspen HYSYS Petroleum Refining
Aspen HYSYS CatCracker
AspenTech services
Ref: Modesto Miranda, CEPSA,
AspenTech User Conference, Berlin, April 2008
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 40
Challenge Solution Result
CEPSA Rigorous reactor modeling for operations and capital projects
Unit revamps and new catalyst selection increased profit by 18,000 €/day
Other lifecycle applications of the unit model for:
− Feedstock optimization for 8,000 €/day improved margin
− Improved LP model for FCC planning and scheduling purposes
Ref: Modesto Miranda, CEPSA,
AspenTech User Conference, Berlin, April 2008
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 41
Valero CDU Unit Model
Note :
• This refinery is in New Jersey and is now owned by PBF.
• Valero used this model to evaluate crude switches on the CDU.
• When crude mix changed, they ran model to predict product rates to give the operators
guidance on where to set APC targets
• Also, they checked key constraints like ovhd reflux pump HP to make sure they did not
blow this constraint.
• If the HP was too high, they would change the cutpoint spec to reduce flow and not cut the
feedrate.
• Management did not care about the overhead 95% point but they did care about unit feed
rate.
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 42
Challenge Solution Result
Valero Deploy models to operations
Challenge
Detect and troubleshoot problems early
Reduce operating costs by better insight into the impact of crude blend changes on operating conditions
Enable operations to perform what-if scenarios and increase agility in decision making
Make faster and better operating decisions in response to disruptions or changes
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 43
Challenge Solution Result
Valero Deploy models to operations
Deploy engineering models in operations in an MS Excel environment
Aspen Simulation Workbook (ASW) interface driven by Aspen HYSYS-based model
Ref: David Schumann & Gregory Davis, Valero,
NPRA Annual Meeting, March 2009 and AspenTech User Conference, Houston, May 2009
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 44
Challenge Solution Result
Valero Deploy models to operations
Analysis times for new feedstock and operating scenarios reduced from days to minutes
Robust models used by operating personnel through Excel interface to improve decision making
Ref: David Schumann & Gregory Davis, Valero,
NPRA Annual Meeting, March 2009 and AspenTech User Conference, Houston, May 2009
AspenTech is ranked as a top innovative growth company
Thank You