1 2s module meeting, 24 september 2012 s tudies on module support inserts refers to work by riikka...
DESCRIPTION
3 Module support insert thermal analysis 2S module meeting, 24 September 2012, indico: Antti Onnela, CERN Insert material properties used AluminiumThermal conductivity, k174 W/mK EpoxyThermal conductivity, k0.2 W/mK Stainless steelThermal conductivity, k15.1 W/mK CO 2 Heat transfer coefficient, h … W/m 2 K Module power estimates Power of a complete module [W] 2x8 CBCs 2 concen- trators L-P GBTGBTIAGBLD Power converter TOTAL Power per support insert next to service board [W] Power per support insert opposite to service board [W] 0.3TRANSCRIPT
1
2S Module meeting, 24 September 2012Studies on module support inserts
Refers to work by Riikka Häsä, Helsinki Institute of Physics, summer student at CERN 2012
2S module meeting, 24 September 2012, indico: 208421
Antti Onnela, CERN
“Heat Transfer Capacity of the 2S Module Support Insert”
“Mechanical Strength of the 2S Module Insert – Cooling Pipe Joints”Reports available in https://espace.cern.ch/Tracker-Upgrade/2S-Module/Shared%20Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx
2
“Heat Transfer Capacity of the 2S Module Support Insert”
2S module meeting, 24 September 2012, indico: 208421
Antti Onnela, CERN
3
Module support insert thermal analysis
2S module meeting, 24 September 2012, indico: 208421
Antti Onnela, CERN
Insert material properties usedAluminium Thermal conductivity, k 174 W/mK
Epoxy Thermal conductivity, k 0.2 W/mKStainless steel Thermal conductivity, k 15.1 W/mK
CO2 Heat transfer coefficient, h 10 000 … 20 000 W/m2K
Module power estimatesPower of a complete module [W]
2x8 CBCs 2 concen-trators
L-P GBT GBTIA GBLD Power converter
TOTAL
1.2 0.36 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.4 2.8Power per support insert next to service board [W]
0.3 0.18 0.25 0.05 0.1 0.2 1.08Power per support insert opposite to service board [W]
0.3 0.3
4
Support insert geometry
Cooling pipe dimension used: 2.2 mm OD, 2.0 mm ID (TOB single-sided rod type)
In addition, a ‘cap’ glued to surround the cooling pipe
2S module meeting, 24 September 2012, indico: 208421
Antti Onnela, CERN
5
Module support insert thermal analysis
Cases analysed:1. 25 mm long insert, h = 10 000 W/m2K 2. 25 mm long insert, h = 20 000 W/m2K3. 30 mm long insert, h = 10 000 W/m2K4. 30 mm long insert, h = 20 000 W/m2K5. 35 mm long insert, h = 10 000 W/m2K6. 40 mm long insert, h = 10 000 W/m2K
2S module meeting, 24 September 2012, indico: 208421
Antti Onnela, CERN
1 2 3 4 5 6
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
PipeCO2
InsertGlue
Total
5.40
4.915.21
4.785.11 5.06
PipeCO2InsertGlueTotal
ΔT /
°C
Case Pipe CO2 Insert Glue Total1 0.10 1.54 2.57 1.78 5.402 0.11 0.85 2.57 1.95 4.913 0.10 1.46 2.56 1.68 5.214 0.11 0.81 2.55 1.87 4.785 0.09 1.41 2.55 1.64 5.116 0.09 1.39 2.55 1.61 5.06
6
Module support insert thermal analysis
Cases analysed:1. 25 mm long insert, h = 10 000 W/m2K 2. 25 mm long insert, h = 20 000 W/m2K3. 30 mm long insert, h = 10 000 W/m2K4. 30 mm long insert, h = 20 000 W/m2K5. 35 mm long insert, h = 10 000 W/m2K6. 40 mm long insert, h = 10 000 W/m2K
Conclusions:• ∆T over the assembly is ~ 5 ˚C in all analysed cases
– Not excellent, as ∆T within the module is estimated to be 5-7 ˚C – Reaching ∆T of 10 ˚C between module and coolant is difficult.
• CO2 heat transfer coefficient (h) has a significant impact– More detailed studies needed to calculate h for different locations and loads along the rod,
as well as finding the best suiting pipe diameter.• Insert has a significant impact, ~ 50% of the ∆T
– Increasing the insert length (mass) does not help much– Shortening the distance between module and cooling pipe would help, but is
geometrically difficult / impossible.– Could we find another insert material, with higher thermal conductivity (> 174 W/mK), still
low mass and manufacturable?
2S module meeting, 24 September 2012, indico: 208421
Antti Onnela, CERN
Case Pipe CO2 Insert Glue Total1 0.10 1.54 2.57 1.78 5.402 0.11 0.85 2.57 1.95 4.913 0.10 1.46 2.56 1.68 5.214 0.11 0.81 2.55 1.87 4.785 0.09 1.41 2.55 1.64 5.116 0.09 1.39 2.55 1.61 5.06
7
“Mechanical Strength of the 2S Module Insert – Cooling Pipe Joints”
2S module meeting, 24 September 2012, indico: 208421
Antti Onnela, CERN
8
Loads and properties
Mechanical properties of the insert / cooling pipe assembly
Aluminium Stainless steel Copper-nickel Araldite 2020
CTE [1/K] 23.1 10-6∙ 16.5 10∙ -6 16.2∙10-6 8.5∙10-5
Modulus of elasticity [GPa] 70 193 152 N/A
Ultimate strength [MPa] 310(tensile)
600 – 800 (tensile)
380 – 590 (tensile)
~ 15(shear)
Yield strength [MPa] 280 300 at 0.2 % elongation
120 - 550 at 0.5 %
elongationN/A
Elongation at break [%] 12 - 15 35 45 N/A
2S module meeting, 24 September 2012, indico: 208421
Antti Onnela, CERN
Carbon-fibre frame:CTE: ~ 0.Stiffness: Very high compared to the thin-walled cooling pipe
CTE difference between carbon-fibre frame and cooling pipe leads with ∆T of 60 ⁰C to tension loads on the inserts:~ 100 N with copper-nickel pipe~ 125 N with stainless steel pipe
The tension load could lead to detaching the cooling pipe from the insert, or detaching the insert from the carbon-fibre frame.
9
Test assemblies
Test assemblies made with • 10 mm glue joint length
– The final connections are likely to be longer !• Four different test assemblies, 3 samples by
type: Two geometries (images above) Two version of the glue joint
1. Well glued joints2. Glue joints with Teflon coating on the cooling
pipe (as used in the TOB)
2S module meeting, 24 September 2012, indico: 208421
Antti Onnela, CERN
10
Test results
• Well glued broke in the pipe• As expected, 10 mm glue joint stronger than the 0.1 mm
walled pipe.• Exception in one sample, where the glue joint broke
completely. Not yet understood why.• Teflon coated broke in the glue joint
• As expected and wanted
2S module meeting, 24 September 2012, indico: 208421
Antti Onnela, CERN
Well glued With Teflon coated pipes
11
Results and conclusions
Expected value
Test results
Average σModulus of elasticity [GPa] 152 142.83 7.70
Ultimate strength [MPa] 495 498.50 13.94Yield strength [MPa] 345 464.39 0.01
Elongation at break [%] 12 - 15 15.76 6.97Maximum force [kN] 0.33 0.33 0.15
2S module meeting, 24 September 2012, indico: 208421
Antti Onnela, CERN
Test resultsAverage σ
Ultimate strength [Mpa] 353.28 62.13Maximum force [kN] 0.23 0.04
Well glued samples: Pipe broken Teflon coated samples: Glue joint slipping
Conclusions:• Maximum load carried by the joints (0.33 kN, 0.23 kN) is higher than the load (0.1 – 1.3 kN) from
the CTE differences between the carbon-fibre and the cooling pipe and ∆T of 60 ⁰C.• These need to be recalculated and tested when changing the pipe and insert dimensions (here old
TOB cooling pipes and 10 mm glue joints were used).
• Will try understand why one well glued joint broke, whereas the pipe should have broken.
• Teflon in the tested glue joints acted, as wanted, as a fuse.• In these samples 10 mm glue joint length. With longer glue joints, the Teflon connected joint will
be stronger, the fuse effect wrt to pipe strength will not be very big• Need to see if we want to pursue with this “sliding cooling contact” concept further or not.• If yes, the choice of adhesive and “Teflon” needs to be carefully selected and tested.