1 historical perspective revised

23
Historical Perspective Copyright@NIOSH 2005/1 1 Safety And Health Officer Certificate Course

Upload: pokjak80

Post on 20-May-2015

1.723 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 historical perspective revised

Historical Perspective

Copyright@NIOSH 2005/1 1

Safety And Health Officer Certificate Course

Page 2: 1 historical perspective revised

Learning Objectives

• To describe the historical developmentof OSH management over the centuries

• To recall the background to the development of OSHA 1994 and its

Copyright@NIOSH 2005/1 2

• To recall the background to the development of OSHA 1994 and its underlying philosophy

• To recall the development of occupational safety and health management system

Page 3: 1 historical perspective revised

Scope

• OSH before and during the industrial revolution

• Development in OSH management

Copyright@NIOSH 2005/1 3

• Development in OSH management between the 1930’s and 1970’s

• Development of self-regulation legislation

• Modern OSH management

Page 4: 1 historical perspective revised

Early Recognition Of Occupational Diseases

• In 1473 a German physician, Ellenborg, published the first known pamphlets on occupational disease from gold miners.

Copyright@NIOSH 2005/1 4

• In 1556 the German scholar, Agricola, described the diseases of miners.

Page 5: 1 historical perspective revised

Early Recognition Of Occupational Diseases

• In 1713 Ramazzini, who is regarded as the father of occupational medicine, suggested that in diagnosis doctors should ask patients about their occupations.

Copyright@NIOSH 2005/1 5

ask patients about their occupations.

Page 6: 1 historical perspective revised

Emergence Of Industrial Accident

• Industrial accidents arose out of the Factory System during the Industrial Revolution in Britain in 18th Century (1700s).

Copyright@NIOSH 2005/1 6

• Women and children worked as heavy labourers under unsafe and unhealthy workplaces.

Page 7: 1 historical perspective revised

Emergence Of Industrial Safety Legislation

• In 1833 English Factory Act was the first effective industrial safety law.

Copyright@NIOSH 2005/1 7

• It provide compensation for accidents rather than to control their causes.

Page 8: 1 historical perspective revised

Emergence Of Industrial Safety Legislation

• Insurance companies inspected work places and suggested prevention methods

• Problem: Safety became injury and

Copyright@NIOSH 2005/1 8

• Problem: Safety became injury and insurance oriented

Page 9: 1 historical perspective revised

Emergence Of Safety Management

• Role of Herbert W. Heinrich (1930’s),

– Developed Domino Theory and promoted control of workers behaviour.

Copyright@NIOSH 2005/1 9

• Problem:

• Focused on worker behaviour and not management

• Caused people to think that safety is about policing worker

Page 10: 1 historical perspective revised

Emergence Of Safety Management

• Frank Bird (1970) developed Loss Control Theory.

• Suggested that underlying cause of accidents are lack of management controls and poor management

Copyright@NIOSH 2005/1 10

controls and poor management decisions.

• Problem:

– Not so popular: blames management(responsibility and control).

Page 11: 1 historical perspective revised

Emergence Of Safety Management

• In 1980’s, Behavioural Based Safety(BBS) was introduced;

• Based on Heinrich’s findings.

• Work by recognizing safe work habits and

Copyright@NIOSH 2005/1 11

• Work by recognizing safe work habits and offering rewards and punishment.

• Problem:

– Focuses on workers and not on hazard or management

– Reward and punishment system have flaws

Page 12: 1 historical perspective revised

Emergence Of Safety Management System

• Current development of Occupational Safety And Health management system was driven by two parallel forces:

Copyright@NIOSH 2005/1 12

A. Self-regulatory legislation in the United Kingdom (1974),

B. Quality management movement

Page 13: 1 historical perspective revised

A Self-Regulation Legislation

• Lord Robens, Chairman of a Royal Safety Commission Report noted that:

– there was too many OSH legislation,

– was fragmented,

Copyright@NIOSH 2005/1 13

– limited in coverage (specific hazards & workplace),

– out of date and difficult to update,

– inflexible (prescriptive),

– people thought that safety was what government inspectors enforced.

Page 14: 1 historical perspective revised

A Self-Regulation Legislation

• Lord Robens recommended

– Self regulation

• Report resulted in the Health and Safety of

Copyright@NIOSH 2005/1 14

• Report resulted in the Health and Safety of Workers At Work Act in the UK in 1974

Page 15: 1 historical perspective revised

A Self-Regulation Legislation

• Similar legislation was enacted in Australia in 1984

• Enacted in Malaysia in 1994 after the 1992

Copyright@NIOSH 2005/1 15

• Enacted in Malaysia in 1994 after the 1992Bright Sparkler accident in Sungai Buloh

Page 16: 1 historical perspective revised

A Self-Regulation Legislation

• Features of “Robens style” legislation:

– General duties of care by:

• Employer, employee, manufacturer, designer, supplier

• Duty of employer to make the workplace safe

Copyright@NIOSH 2005/1 16

• Duty of employer to make the workplace safe

– Consultation with employees through Safety and Health Committees

– Safety and Health Officer as advisor and coordinator

– Improvement and prohibition notices

Page 17: 1 historical perspective revised

A Self-Regulation Legislation

Legislation follow major accidents and reinforce need for management system

ACCIDENT REGULATION/PROGRAMME

Flixborough (1974) CIMAH regulations 1996

Copyright@NIOSH 2005/1 17

Flixborough (1974) CIMAH regulations 1996

Bhopal (1984) “Responsible Care” /

Process safety

Piper Alpha (1988) Risk Assessment /

Management system

Page 18: 1 historical perspective revised

Quality Management Approach to Occupational Safety and

Health Management

• There are similar issues in safety management as in quality management

• Example:

Copyright@NIOSH 2005/1 18

• Example:

– Productivity

– Worker involvement

– Proactive approach

– Scientific approach

– Customer and human rights

Page 19: 1 historical perspective revised

Quality Management Approach to Occupational Safety and

Health Management

• Management system standards:

– ISO 9000 QMS was proven successful and

Copyright@NIOSH 2005/1 19

– ISO 9000 QMS was proven successful and ISO 14000 EMS was introduced in 1996

– UK published BS 8800 and Australia AS8401 OSH management systems in 1996

Page 20: 1 historical perspective revised

Quality Management Approach to Occupational Safety and

Health Management

– International and auditable OHSAS 18001 OSH Management System published in 1999

Copyright@NIOSH 2005/1 20

– ILO approved an OSH management system for governments to adopt during 2000

Page 21: 1 historical perspective revised

Summary

– The industrial revolution cause of industrial accidents.

– Laws were enacted to compensate and protect workers in 1833.

Copyright@NIOSH 2005/1 21

protect workers in 1833.

– Safety management guidelines began with Heinrich and followed by Frank Bird and others.

Page 22: 1 historical perspective revised

Summary

– Lord Robens in 1972 recommended self-regulatory legislation. Adopted by Malaysia in 1994.

Copyright@NIOSH 2005/1 22

– Outcome of accidents in the 1970s and 1980s resulted in OSH management system today.

Page 23: 1 historical perspective revised

Summary

- Health problems due to occupation has been known from ancient times

- Industrial accidents became rampant after the

Copyright@NIOSH 2005/1 23

- Industrial accidents became rampant after the industrial revolution

- Accidents in the 70’s & 80’s resulted in OSH-MS today