1 title i supplemental grants 2007-08. 2 introduction elizabeth mcclure education consultant soumary...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Title ISupplemental Grants
2007-08
2
Introduction
Elizabeth McClure Education Consultant
Soumary VongrassamyGrants Specialist
3
OVERVIEW
4
Overview and Purpose
Serve as a piece of the Statewide System of Support (SSOS)
Provide districts with additional funds and resources to support their neediest schools
Funds are to supplement district efforts
5
Eligibility
Title I schools that: have been identified for improvement (SIFI) have missed adequate yearly progress
(AYP), or were identified as high need by a
Department of Public Instruction (DPI) review of distances from the 2014 annual measurable objectives (AMO) for reading and mathematics
6
Goals
Provide district support for these schools based on the Characteristics of Successful Districts
Address the needs of eligible schools based on AYP indicators
7
TIMELINE
8
Timeline
Grant applications: Due October 1, 2007
Reporting: Mid-year report due February 29, 2008 End-of-year report due June 30, 2008
Required grantee meetings: October 17, 2007 (Stevens Point) January 14-16, 2008 (Madison) April 2, 2008 (Stevens Point)
9
APPLICATION
10
Application
Basics Statement of Need Goals and Objectives Budget Rubric
11
Basics
All grant activities must be based on a needs assessment
Funds can be spent on items for district and school improvement, such as the examples in the guidelines
Non-educational incentives are not allowed
12
V. STATEMENT OF NEED
A. District Needs. Summarize your district’s key strengths and areas of improvement for providing support to its neediest schools. Provide a rationale for each key strength and area of improvement by using the Characteristics of Successful Districts, your district’s list of eligible Title I school(s), background data, and other relevant information. Specific information in this narrative will help the grant writer focus when describing improvement plans for the neediest schools. Be sure to address each of the five Characteristics regardless of whether it applies to the district as a need. The five Characteristics are:1. vision, values, and culture.2. leadership and governance. 3. decision making and accountability.4. curriculum and instruction. 5. professional development and staff quality.
B. School Needs. Based on the analysis of the 2007 school performance reports for eligible Title I schools, describe the adequate yearly progress (AYP) indicators and/or subgroups to be targeted with grant activities.
Statement of Need
13
Statement of Need—Part A: District Needs District—use Characteristics of
Successful Districts Vision, Values and Culture Leadership and Governance Decision Making and Accountability Curriculum and Instruction Professional Development and Staff Quality
Find a copy of the Characteristics at: http://www.dpi.wi.gov/ssos/pdf/characteristics.pdf
14
Statement of Need—Part B: School Needs
School—use Adequate Yearly Progress School Review Summary reports District Assessment Coordinators has
access to retrieve reports at:
https://wsasors.turnleaf.com/Private/logon.aspx?ReturnURL=%2fPrivate%2fHome.aspx
Website found in notification letter
15
Annual Measurable Objectives
2004-07 Reading: 67.5%Math: 47.5%
2007-10Reading: 74%Math: 58%
16
17
Sample AYP report—3-year Summary
18
Sample AYP Report—Reading
19
Sample AYP Report—Math
AMO is 58% for 2007
20
Sample AYP Reports—Final Hints Review all the subgroup scores
Pay special attention to those that are close to falling below the bar or will be below the bar for the next AMO 2007-10
• Reading: 74%• Math: 58%
Watch for declines in student and subgroup performance from previous years
Utilize other district level data, where applicable, to complete the picture of school performance given by the AYP report
21
District Plan for Use of Funds—Goals and Objectives
Goalsare not typically measurable, but
describe the desired outcome;should be logically related to an
identified need; andshould be clearly and succinctly
written.
22
District Plan for Use of Funds—
Goals and Objectives Objectives
should provide framework by which a given goal is met, reduced, or satisfied;
should be clearly and succinctly written; should be measurable, time-limited, logically
related to goals and describe desired outcomes
may address individual schools’ needs.
23
District Plan for Use of Funds—
Goals and Objectives cont’d For each objective:
include the chronological activitiesgive a timeline of the stated activitiesinclude the allotted grant funds for
Year 1 of the grantdescribe the evaluation methods to be
used
24
VI. DISTRICT PLAN FOR USE OF FUNDS (cont.)
Duplicate for additional goals.
District Improvement GoalImprove reading achievement for English Language Learners in our identified schools
Goal Evaluation Methods Analysis of WKCE and other benchmark testing, analysis of classroom level data
Goal Implementation Objectives Activities Timelines
Grant Funds
Objective Evaluation Methods
ObjectiveAll staff in the eligible schools will participate in professional development activities designed to support ELLs in the classroom
"Reading Strategies for ELLs" workshop
Workshop refresher and follow-up
Classroom action research group with ELL focus
Monthly book group on reading across content areas with focus on ELLs
Employ .50 FTE instructional coach to build capacity for utilizing reading strategies for ELLs in the classroom
Grade/subject level meetings to discuss professional development
October 28, 2007 -- inservice day
January 18, 2008
January, 2008-June 2009
September 2007-June 2009
January 2008 - December 2008
November 2007-May 2008
$2,000 $2,000
$3,000
$500
$30,000
n/a
Workshop evaluation and feedback; staff meeting discussions and ongoing needs assessment to inform future workshop(s)
Principal and/or leadership team conduct informal observations to monitor use of strategies
Principal and/or leadership team attend grade/subject level meetings to participate in and observe discussion of professional development
Analyze student by student data to determine progress
25
Goal Implementation Objectives Activities
Timelines Grant Funds
Objective Evaluation Methods
Objective
The top 35% of ELLs who need additional assistance in reading will participate in extended learning opportunities
Purchase materials for after-school and supplementary activities for ELLs
Pay for staff to instruct during after-school programming
Host 6 workshops for parents about how to support their child’s academic success
January 2008
January 2008-June 2009
September 2007-June 2009
$5,000
$6,000
$2000
List of students identified by data to participate in extended learning opportunities
Analysis of common, formative assessments and progress monitoring to determine increases in ELLs’ reading performance
Parent attendance at workshops
Evaluation and feedback from parents about workshops and their sense of efficacy in helping their child succeed academically
ObjectiveAll eligible schools will implement benchmark testing (at least four tests a year) for ELLs for the school years 2007-08 and 2008-09
Conduct meetings with ESL/bilingual staff to investigate options for benchmark assessment kits
Purchase kits
Provide professional development for all staff on using new benchmark assessments; analyzing data to inform specific needs and monitor progress of ELLs
September 2007-June 2008
June 2008
September 2008-June 2009
n/a
$2,000
YEAR 2
Verify assessments are studied and evaluated : review minutes of meetings where the kits were discussed; principal/leadership team member attend meetings
Professional development evaluation and feedback
ESL/bilingual staff meetings about ongoing needs assessment to inform future professional development
Principal and/or leadership team conduct informal observations to monitor use of benchmark assessments
26
ObjectiveProvide research-based instructional materials for ESL instruction and/or to enhance general classroom instruction for all classrooms in the eligible schools
Conduct meetings with general and ESL/bilingual staff to investigate research-based instructional materials that best suit the needs of ELLs in the district
Purchase instructional materials
Conduct professional development to train staff on curricula and its implementation
Add high interest trade books in languages other than English to Library Media Center
September 2007-January 2008
January 2008
January 2008-January 2009
November 2007
n/a
$8000
$2,000
$5000
To verify materials are studied and evaluated, review minutes of meetings where the materials were discussed
Materials evaluation and feedback; staff and grade level discussions; ongoing evaluation to inform continued use of materials
Principal and/or leadership team conduct informal observations to monitor use of new materials
Goal Implementation Objectives Activities
Timelines Grant Funds
Objective Evaluation Methods
27
VI. DISTRICT PLAN FOR USE OF FUNDS (cont.)
Duplicate for additional goals.
District Improvement Goal
Students will improve performance on mathematics constructed response items
Goal Evaluation MethodsWKCE results and other benchmark testing
Goal Implementation Objectives Activities Timelines
Grant Funds
Objective Evaluation Methods
ObjectiveAll staff in the eligible schools will develop and utilize common assessments, including open-ended response items, as an integral part of all mathematics instruction
Provide series of workshops for professional development on developing, utilizing, and scoring common assessments
Provide additional professional development on the development, implementation, and scoring of constructed response items
Provide staff time for common assessment development: restructure scheduling to provide for grade level and subject level meetings and provide stipends for time outside of contractual hours
September, 2007-08
September, 2007-08
September 2007 - May 2008
$8,000
$5,000
$1,000
Workshop evaluation and feedback; staff meeting discussions and ongoing needs assessment to inform future workshop(s)
Principal and/or leadership team conduct informal observations to monitor use of common assessments
Staff and Grade/Subject level meetings focused on development and discussion of common assessments
Examine attendance data for staff members at above meetings
Analyze student data (from grades, common assessments, formative assessments) quarterly to monitor progress
28
ObjectiveAll staff will utilize common assessment data to inform instructional decision making
Provide series of workshops for professional development on utilizing common assessment results to analyze student performance and identify gaps in instruction
Provide staff time for analysis of data and discussion of instructional changes: restructure scheduling to provide for grade level and subject level meetings and provide stipends for time outside of contractual hours
September 2008-May 2009
September 2008-May 2009
YEAR 2
YEAR 2
Workshop evaluation and feedback; staff meeting discussions and ongoing needs assessment to inform future workshop(s)
Staff and Grade/Subject level meetings focused on data analysis and discussions of instructional changes
Evidence of instructional modifications based on data analysis, including student level data
Goal Implementation Objectives Activities
Timelines Grant Funds
Objective Evaluation Methods
29
ObjectiveThe top 40% of students who need additional assistance in responding to constructed response items will participate in extended learning opportunities
Purchase materials for after-school and supplementary activities
Pay for staff to instruct during after-school programming
Host 4 math nights for parents on how to support their child’s academic progress in math
May 2008
September 2008-May 2009
September 2007-June 2009
$5000
YEAR 2
$1,500
List of students identified by data to participate in extended learning opportunities
Analysis of continued common assessments and progress monitoring to determine increases in student performance
Evaluation from parents about workshops and how helpful they were in assisting their child’s performance and progress in math
Goal Implementation Objectives Activities
Timelines Grant Funds
Objective Evaluation Methods
30
VI. DISTRICT PLAN FOR USE OF FUNDS (cont.)
Duplicate for additional goals.
District Improvement Goal
Improve district support of principals as instructional leaders
Goal Evaluation MethodsEvaluate model of district support for instructional leadership; feedback from principals; artifacts from support activities
Goal Implementation Objectives Activities Timelines
Grant Funds
Objective Evaluation Methods
ObjectiveEstablish professional community for district's principals that allows for a minimum of one opportunity per month for principals from eligible schools to share best practice
Monthly workgroups for principals—by grade level span and feeder schools
Online community forum for principals to discuss and analyze practice
Annual principal leadership retreats
Leadership newsletter that addresses instructional leadership with examples, research articles and resources for principals
September 2007-June 2009
October 2007-June 2009
November 2007, 2008
September 2007-June 2009
$1,000
n/a
$10,000
n/a
Attendance of principals at workgroup meetings
Surveys of principals’ sense of community and support in district
Principal turnover in district; exit surveys
Feedback from principals at regular meetings, from website, and informally about resources available
Evaluation of and feedback about annual retreats
Review of leadership newsletters
31
ObjectiveIncrease awareness of instructional leadership strategies through no less than eight opportunities for focussed professional development per year for each principal of eligible schools
Monthly professional development for principals that highlights instructional leadership strategies
Attendance at New Wisconsin Promise conference
Scholarships for principals to attend principal institutes
Membership to The Principals’ Center (Harvard) for identified schools’ principals
September 2007-May 2009
January 2008, 2009
September 2007-May 2009
2007-2009
$2000
$2000
$4000
$1000
Professional development evaluation and feedback
Implementation of knowledge/skills learned in professional development at school level; school visits and informal observations of school principals
Presentations at district level and principal meetings about findings from New Wisconsin Promise conference
Contributions to leadership newsletter based on attendance at conferences, principal institutes and membership to The Principals’ Center
Goal Implementation Objectives Activities
Timelines Grant Funds
Objective Evaluation Methods
32
ObjectiveDevelop and implement a support system for all initial principals
Monthly professional development for new principals to assist with typical responsibilities (e.g. budget, hiring, evaluation)
New principalmeetings to discuss and plan for leadership
Mentorship program (with stipend for principal mentors)
September 2007-May 2009
September 2007-June 2009
September 2007-June 2009
$2000
$1000
$3000
Professional development evaluation and feedback
Feedback from school staff regarding building leadership
Attendance at professional development activities and new principal meetings
Surveys of new principals’ experience with mentors
Goal Implementation Objectives Activities
Timelines Grant Funds
Objective Evaluation Methods
33
Budget
Budget Detail Budget Summary
Instruction Support Services—Pupil & Instructional Staff Support Services—Administration
Budget Revisions Submit both revised budget summary sheet
and written explanations Due June 30, 2008
34
REVIEW
35
Review
Statement of Need Use of Characteristics of Successful Districts Use of AYP School Review Summary Reports
Goals Alignment with Statement of Need section Evaluation methods
Objectives Alignment with goals Logical activities, timelines and allotted grant funds Evaluation methods
36
Grant Awards
Reviews are planned to be completed by end of October
Grant awards will be distributed promptly to approved applications
37
Contact Information
Elizabeth McClure Education Consultant (608) 261-6324 [email protected]
Soumary Vongrassamy Grants Specialist (608) 267-1067 [email protected]