11 e voting-proposal_it_project_management10may12
DESCRIPTION
Topic: PRINCE2 Proposal for Internet Voting Project Module: IT Project Management Mark: 84% Distinction Hand-in date: Apr 2012 Sheffield Hallam UniversityTRANSCRIPT
INTE
RNET VOTI
NG
AT
PO
LL
I NG
STA
TI O
N
3 May 2012
Digital Democracy Team
1. PROJECT PROPOSAL
2
TITLE & PROJECT TYPE
Title:
• Implementation of polling-place Internet voting in the next general election (2015)–Sheffield City.
3
Project Type
• Implementation of electronic Internet polling-place voting system.
Implement electronic hardware and cloud technologies
in the next general election in Sheffield City – 2015.
AIM & OBJECTIVES
1. Develop solutions for electronic hardware.
2. Design solutions for software.
3. Identify and evaluate public perception.
4. Increase integrity and credibility.
5. Increase the number of voters.
6. Reduce the cost of running elections.OB
JEC
TIV
ES
4
AIM >>
BACKGROUND
• Polling-place internet & Internet voting
• Fraud in remote internet & Impossible to establish effective governance to protect the integrity (Brack and Noble 2001).
• Establish 100% E-Government.
• Implement Remote Internet voting in the near future.
• Serve as data collection method for public perception in voting.
5
STRATEGIC PLAN
Long-term Plan Remote Internet voting and 100% E-Government
RELA
TIO
NS
HI
P
6
• Project will act as an intermediary stepping stone towards strategic plan.
• By establishing polling-place Internet voting in Sheffield, it serves as part of an overall strategy to gain insights into public behavior towards voting using electronic hardware and software.
• From this project, it is hope to form a firm foundation towards long-term strategic plan.
OUTCOMES & SCOPE
Project Outcome
• Establish successful solutions both hardware and software for polling-place Internet voting.
• Improve the number of voters and increase integrity of voting process.
7
Project Scope and Possible Execution
• Implementation will be executed in Sheffield city as testing for nation wide roll out.
TIMELINES & MEASUREMENT
Timelines• Implementation will take affect in the next
general election in 2015.
8
Measurement & Evaluation Sheffield city census to collect public and voters
feedback.
Comparison of overall implementation budget against budget of last election.
Must achieve higher voters turnout.
Benchmark speed of vote counting versus last election.
2. MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
9
10
PRINCE2
Agile
Management
Strategy
Overa
ll
Pro
ject
Hard
ware
&
Soft
ware
S
olu
tion
3. BUSINESS CASE
11
Benefits
E-democra
cy
Accuracy
Cost saving
Profit through
partnershipIncreases number of voters
Disabled and non-English lang. people
Time saving
Less clerical work
Easier voting &
more satisfaction
1. Easier Voting
2. Accuracy
3. Voting Integrity
4. Cost Reduction
5. E-Government• Identify and evaluate public
perception and reaction to polling-place Internet voting.
• Increase integrity and credibility in the next general election.
• Increase the number of voters in the next general election.
6. Etc.
BENEFITSLO
NG
-TER
M
12
BUDGET1. Machines:
• 3 voting machines / station• Plus 1 for disabilities
2. Maintenance Plan: • Replace spared in 30 min.
3. Network and cloud server: • 24/7 support
4. Labour & Consultancy: • PM, Trainers and Staff
5. Insurance: • 5% of total project
6. Campaigning & Awareness Plan: • 15% to introduce the new
term of technology7. Storage and Logistics contract:
• 1 year for warehousing• Logistic for machines
8. Network and information security service
Estimate Budget: £3,900,928.46
Last Budget: £5,000,000.00
(Sheffield City Council 2010)
13
Machines38%
Maintenance plan24%
Network and
cloud server
0%
Labor & Consul-tancy 11%
In-suran
ce5%
Cam-paigning
& Aware-
ness plan13%
Informa-tion and Network Secuirty
Plan3%
Storage and logistics con-tract5%
4. RISK ASSESSMENT
14
RISK ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK
15
Risk Assessment
COMMON ISSUES
• Security :
• Contract with high reputation network and information security .
• Language:
• Customize the system to support European languages and other common languages used in Sheffield .
• People with disabilities:
• Install a special machine at every polling station.
16
5. DETAILED PLAN
17
DETAILED PLAN TIME LINE
18
Contact Project Manager
10 Apr – 23 Apr
Produce Project Plan
24 Apr – 7 May
Product Business Case
8 May – 21 May
Risk Analysis8 May -21 May
Contact Staff14 May – 25 May
Awareness Campaign22 May - 2 July
Train Staff28 May – 8 June
Kick-off5 Apr
Finish 21 July
Today3 May 21 May 2 July
Approve the project by Government authorities
11 May
Approve any new updates by the governmental
authorizes24 May
End registration day
6 July
Election day
20 July
* Please see more details in the Detailed Plan file.
4 M
ON
TH
S
Get Feedback9-20 July
6. ENVISIONED SOLUTION
19
2) VOTING
3) COUNTING AND REPORTING
1) REGISTRATION Data
Data
Data
2 Replicated Sites
Voting
Fingerprint
Data
Online result
Online voting
ID + FingerSecured &
Fast
1
2
3
Cloud computing
*Voter can pre-register online.
TECHNICAL SOLUTION
VO
TIN
G
REV
EA
LH
IGH
AV
AIL
AB
ILIT
Y
Databases
Cloud Servers
20Cloud computing is the delivery of computing as a service rather than a product, whereby shared resources, software,
and information are provided to computers and other devices as a utility (like the electricity grid) over a network (typically the Internet) (NIST2011).
VOTER’S REGISTRATION DAY
Show ID card or/and number
registered online
Scan Fingerprint
1) REGISTERATIO
N
2) VOTING TRIAL
Fill ID Card and Information
Check Information(Online)
Test Voting
See voting details at next slide
VOTER STAFF
Give Advice& Support
*Voter can pre-register online.
21
VOTING DAY
Press ID
Scan Fingerprint
Press ID
Vote
1) IDENTIFICATIO
N
20 SEC/PERSON
2) VOTING
40 SEC/PERSON
22
SOLUTION MAPPING
Risk
E-voting
Biometric and voting machines
Train people onon registration day
Hire IT security expertsto prove system
Use proven and Standardized machines
Save voting time
Test system & people
Security Systems Guarantee
More confident & Rent/Sell hardware
SOLUTION >> BENEFITSC
ITIZ
EN
’S
AS
PEC
T
23
SOLUTION MAPPING (CONT.)
Use fingerprint technology
Separate fingerprint and voting machine
Pre-online registration
Use cloud computer for voting server
24
Cheaper and identification
Save Fingerprint & Easy to replace
Reduce time to register
Reduce Infra. Cost & High availability
SOLUTION >> BENEFITSE-V
OTIN
G
SY
STEM
7. COMMUNICATION STRATEGY
25
POWER INFLUENCE MATRIX
Keep Satisfied
Manage Closely
MonitorKeep
Informed
Level of Power
Level of Influence
Adopted from (Sharma 2012)
26
STA
KEH
OLD
ER
M
AN
AG
EM
EN
T
European Union Training Staff Vendor
NGO Election Monitors
UK Public (Sheffield)
Suppliers External
Consultant
• Electoral Commission
UK Public (General)
Project Managers
The Civil Service
COMMUNICATION STRATEGY
Aspects for Communication
Management
• Communication planning
• Information distribution
• Performance reporting
• Administrative closure
Planning
Distribution
Reporting
Closure
(Maylor 2003)
27
COMMUNICATION PLANWhat Who/Target Purpose When/
FrequencyMethod(s)
Initiation Meeting The civil service, Electoral commission, Suppliers,
external consultants, NG election monitor
Collect information for Initiation Plan
FIRST Before Project start date.
Meeting
Distribute Project Initiation Plan
The civil service, Electoral commission, external
consultants, NG election monitor
Distribute Plan to aware stakeholders of project
scope.
Before Project Start Date. Document distributed via hardcopy or electronically.
Project Acceptance All stakeholders Communicate plans and stakeholder
roles/responsibilities.Encourage communication
among stakeholders.
At or near Project Start Date Meeting and distributed via electrically. Post on
website.
Status Reports Project Office and all stakeholders except UK
public (general & Sheffield), and European Union.
Update stakeholders on development of the project.
Regularly Scheduled. Every two weeks.
Distribute electronically or hardcopy.
Team Meetings Entire Project Team.Individual meetings for sub-teams, technical team, and
Functional teams as appropriate.
To review detailed. Regularly Scheduled. Weekly is recommended for entire team. Weekly or bi-
weekly for sub-teams.
Meeting
Project Consultancy Group Meetings
Project Consultancy Group and Project Manager.
Change authority. Project support.
Inform Project Consultancy Group on status and talk over critical issues. Work
through issues and changes .
Regularly Scheduled. Monthly is recommended.
Meeting
28
COMMUNICATION PLAN (CONT.)What Who/Target Purpose When/
FrequencyMethod(s)
Review
Project Office, Project Manager, and external
consultancy, NG electoral monitor.
Review status reports, issues, and risks. To
recognize and communicate potential risks and issues
that may affect the schedule, and budget.
MonthlyScheduled by the Project Office
Meeting/ReportProject Office will
produce report using their template.
Post Project Review
Project Office, Project Manager, civil service, electoral commission, sponsors, NG electoral
monitor.
Review accomplishments, improvements, and actions
that had impact.
After solution testing phase. Meeting/Report Project Office will produce report.
Quarterly Project Review
Project Office, Project Manager, civil service, electoral commission, sponsors, NG electoral
monitor.
Review overall process of the project and make
decisions for some area that need action.
Quarterly, scheduled by the Project Office.
Meeting/ReportProject Office will
produce report using internal template.
Presentations to Special Interest
Groups
PMT (Project Managers Team), Leadership Group,
NG electoral monitor.
To inform external groups to promote communication for
creating awareness of project.
At project milestones. Presentation/Demonstration
Promote voting
UK Public, European Union, Civil service and NG electoral monitor.
Informing and training and encouraging voters to vote.
Before (one month) voting date.
Electronic Communications, TV,
Newspapers.Training staff
Staff, Project support, Team
managers.
Communicate staffs for any information needed for
working with new machines and this kind of voting.
After solution testing. Presentation/Discussion. Some classes. Emailing.
29
8. REFERENCES
30
ANANDA, D., Bui, A., Gonzalez, J., & Prempeh, M. (n.d.). The future of E-Voting. Retrieved March 20, 2012 from University of Washington: http://www.cs.washington.edu/education/courses/csep590/04au/clearedprojects/Ananda.pdf
BRACK, A., & Nobl, P. (2002). E-democracy around the world. Retrieved March 20, 2012 from ePractice.eu: http://www.epractice.eu/en/library/281447.
BRACK, Andy and NOBLE, Phil (2001). E-democracy around the world. A survey for the bertelsmann foundation.
CULHANE, Patrick (2004). Project proposal template. [online]. Last accessed March 21 2012 at: http://www.axi.ca/tca/may2004/templatesplus_2.shtml.
DAWSON, Christian W. (2009). Chapter 3 choosing a project and writing a proposal. In: Projects in computing and information systems - A student's guide. 2nd Edition ed., Addison-Wesley, 87-58.
MAYLOR, Harvey (2003). Project management. London; New York : Financial times, Prentice Hall.
NIST(2011). The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing. [online]. Last accessed on 30 April 2012 at: http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-145/SP800-145.pdf.
RAYNER, G. (2010). The Telegraph. Retrieved March 28, 2012 from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/election-2010/7689337/General-Election-2010-polling-station-chaos-by-constituency.html.
SCHRYEN, G. (no date). E-DEMOCRACY: INTERNET VOTING. Retrieved March 22, 2012 from University of Technology Aachen: www.iadis.net/dl/final_uploads/200302C157.pdf.
SHARMA, Rupen (2010). What is the Power/Influence Grid (Power/Influence Matrix)?. [online]. Last accessed 30 April 2012 at: http://www.brighthub.com/office/project-management/articles/81140.aspx.
SHEFFIELD CITY COUNCIL. (2010). Sheiffield City Council. Retrieved March 22, 2012 from Sheiffield City Council: https://www.sheffield.gov.uk/your-city-council/sheffield-profile/population-and-health.html
REFERENCES
31
THANK YO
U
DI G
I TA
L DE
MO
CR
AC
Y T
EA
M
32