2008 national conference on the social norms approach, hyatt … · new jersey secondary schools...

18
Assessing Bullying in 2008 National Conference on the Social Norms Approach, Hyatt Regency San Francisco Airport, CA, July 22, 2008 New Jersey Secondary Schools Applying the Social Norms Model Applying the Social Norms Model to Adolescent Violence David W. Craig, Ph.D. Professor of Biochemistry H. Wesley Perkins, Ph.D. Professor of Sociology Hobart and William Smith Colleges Geneva, New York 14456 www.youthhealthsafety.org

Upload: others

Post on 20-May-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2008 National Conference on the Social Norms Approach, Hyatt … · New Jersey Secondary Schools Applying the Social Norms ModelApplying the Social Norms Model to Adolescent Violence

Assessing Bullying in 2008 National Conference on the Social Norms Approach, Hyatt Regency San Francisco Airport, CA, July 22, 2008

g y gNew Jersey Secondary Schools

Applying the Social Norms ModelApplying the Social Norms Model to Adolescent Violence

David W. Craig, Ph.D.Professor of Biochemistry

H. Wesley Perkins, Ph.D.Professor of Sociology

Hobart and William Smith CollegesGeneva, New York 14456

www.youthhealthsafety.org

Page 2: 2008 National Conference on the Social Norms Approach, Hyatt … · New Jersey Secondary Schools Applying the Social Norms ModelApplying the Social Norms Model to Adolescent Violence

AbstractAn online survey has been developed for use in assessing bullying in secondary schools and for conducting social norms interventions. The survey reveals attitudes about bullying, incidence levels of bullying behavior as reported by perpetrators and victims and also assesses perceived norms among peers regarding these attitudes, bullying behavior, and experiences as victims Results from more than 10 000 students from 19 schools showas victims. Results from more than 10,000 students from 19 schools show that while bullying is substantial, it is not the norm. The most common (and erroneous) perception, however, is that the majority engage in and support such behavior. Multisite analysis reveals that perceptions of bullying b h i hi hl di ti f l b ll i b h i thbehaviors are highly predictive of personal bullying behavior—more so than actual school norms. Examples of media created to reduce harmful misperceptions about bullying will be presented.

ACKNOWLEGEMENT: The authors wish to thank the staff of the Center for Addiction Studies, Rowan University, for their work enlisting New Jersey schools and coordinating local school participation in this research. Funding for the development of this survey was provided in full through a grant by the New Jersey Department of Education with funds from the United States D t t f Ed ti d th S f d D F S h l d C iti A t f th NDepartment of Education under the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act of the No Child Left Behind Act.

Craig and PerkinsYouth Health & Safety ProjectHobart and Wm Smith Colleges

Page 3: 2008 National Conference on the Social Norms Approach, Hyatt … · New Jersey Secondary Schools Applying the Social Norms ModelApplying the Social Norms Model to Adolescent Violence

Web-based Survey Instrumenty

http://www.socialnormsurveys.org/bullya/(Enter test for username and password)

Craig and PerkinsYouth Health & Safety ProjectHobart and Wm Smith Colleges

Page 4: 2008 National Conference on the Social Norms Approach, Hyatt … · New Jersey Secondary Schools Applying the Social Norms ModelApplying the Social Norms Model to Adolescent Violence

School Sample DemographicsSchool Characteristics

Number of Schools18 NJ + 1 NYC area

9 conducted surveys multiple times 35 school cohorts surveyed

School Size - mean (range) 690 (62 – 1,221)Sample Sizes - mean (range) 302 (10 – 799)Cohort Response Rate - mean (range) 53% (11% – 91%)Percent on free lunch - mean (range) 20% (1% – 77%)P Whi ( ) 62% (3% 96%)Percent White - mean (range) 62% (3% – 96%)Percent Hispanic - mean (range) 14% (1% – 75%)Percent Black - mean (range) 19% (0% – 47%)Percent Asian - mean (range) 7% (0% – 41%)Student-Teacher ratio - mean (range) 12 (8 – 18)

Respondent CharacteristicsNumber of Respondents 10,586Males / Females - % 48% / 52%Grade LevelsGrade Levels

5-6 36%7 32%8-9 32%

A ( ) 12 (11 16)Age – mean (range) 12.5 (11 – 16)Geographic Area

Suburban 53%Urban/suburban 37%Rural 10%

Craig and PerkinsYouth Health & Safety ProjectHobart and Wm Smith Colleges

Page 5: 2008 National Conference on the Social Norms Approach, Hyatt … · New Jersey Secondary Schools Applying the Social Norms ModelApplying the Social Norms Model to Adolescent Violence

Bully Behavior at School in Last 30 Days:Actual Prevalence and Perceived Norms

Norm is not to bully but

Pushing, shoving, hitting, kicking, hair pulling, or tripping

Teasing in an unfriendly way...

Calling hurtful names...

Excluding someone from a group to make them feel bad

(N=10,586)Norm is not to bully but only a minority know it!

tripping... feel bad...

ehav

iors

60

80%

60

80%

60

80%

60

80%

Act

ual B

e

0

20

40

0

20

40

0

20

40

0

20

40

of N

orm

None Once 2 - 3 4+ Times None Once 2 - 3 4+ Times None Once 2 - 3 4+ Times None Once 2 - 3 4+ Times

60

80%

60

80%

80%

80%

rcep

tions

o

0

20

40

60

0

20

40

60

0

20

40

60

0

20

40

60

Legend: actual norm misperceived norm accurately perceived norm

Per

0None Once 2 - 3 4+ Times

0None Once 2 - 3 4+ Times

0None Once 2 - 3 4+ Times

0None Once 2 - 3 4+ Times

Craig and PerkinsYouth Health & Safety ProjectHobart and Wm Smith Colleges

Page 6: 2008 National Conference on the Social Norms Approach, Hyatt … · New Jersey Secondary Schools Applying the Social Norms ModelApplying the Social Norms Model to Adolescent Violence

Bullying Behavior at School in Last 30 Days:Actual Prevalence and Perceived Norms

Norm is not to bully but

Taking or damaging someone else's

belongings

Spreading unkind stories or rumors

about someone elseThreatening to hurt someone

Making someone do something they did

not want to do

(N=10,586)Norm is not to bully but only a minority know it!

belongings about someone else hurt someone

havi

ors

60

80%

60

80%

60

80%

60

80%

Act

ual B

eh

0

20

40

60

0

20

40

60

0

20

40

60

0

20

40

60

AN

orm

0None Once 2 - 3 4+ Times

80%

80%

0None Once 2 - 3 4+ Times

80%

0None Once 2 - 3 4+ Times

80%

0None Once 2 - 3 4+ Times

eptio

ns o

f

20

40

60

20

40

60

0

20

40

60

0

20

40

60

Per

ce 0None Once 2 - 3 4+ Times

0None Once 2 - 3 4+ Times

0None Once 2 - 3 4+ Times

0None Once 2 - 3 4+ Times

Legend: actual norm misperceived norm accurately perceived normCraig and PerkinsYouth Health & Safety ProjectHobart and Wm Smith Colleges

Page 7: 2008 National Conference on the Social Norms Approach, Hyatt … · New Jersey Secondary Schools Applying the Social Norms ModelApplying the Social Norms Model to Adolescent Violence

Distribution of Bully Behavior Index(N = 7 753)*(N = 7,753)

35

40

25

30

dent

s

Bully index computed as sum of eight measures on a 0-3 scale. Those that never bully would

score a 0 while those that frequently bully on all eight

20

25

ent o

f Stu

d frequently bully on all eight items would score 24.

10

15

Perc

e

0

5

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 240 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Bully Behavior Index*Includes only schools where at least 50% of students responded overall from the grades surveyed.

Craig and PerkinsYouth Health & Safety ProjectHobart and Wm Smith Colleges

Page 8: 2008 National Conference on the Social Norms Approach, Hyatt … · New Jersey Secondary Schools Applying the Social Norms ModelApplying the Social Norms Model to Adolescent Violence

Distribution of Bully Perception Index (N = 7 632)*(N = 7,632)

8

9

Bully Perception Index clearly

6

7y p y

shows massive misperceptions

4

5

tude

nts

2

3

erce

nt o

f S

0

1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Pe

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Bully Perception Index*Includes only schools where at least 50% of students responded overall from the grades surveyed.

Craig and PerkinsYouth Health & Safety ProjectHobart and Wm Smith Colleges

Page 9: 2008 National Conference on the Social Norms Approach, Hyatt … · New Jersey Secondary Schools Applying the Social Norms ModelApplying the Social Norms Model to Adolescent Violence

Distribution of Bullying Misperception (N = 7 632)*(N = 7,632)*

6

7

8 6% underestimate bullying

5

6

ents

3.4% are accurate

88.0% overestimate bullying

8.6% underestimate bullying

3

4

ent o

f Stu

de

2Perc

e

0

1

-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

*Includes only schools where at least 50% of students responded overall from the grades surveyed.

5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Misperception of School Bullying NormCraig and PerkinsYouth Health & Safety ProjectHobart and Wm Smith Colleges

Page 10: 2008 National Conference on the Social Norms Approach, Hyatt … · New Jersey Secondary Schools Applying the Social Norms ModelApplying the Social Norms Model to Adolescent Violence

Standardized regression coefficients predicting bullying behavior in the last 30 days (N=7 175 a)bullying behavior in the last 30 days (N=7,175 a)

Standardized

Perception of bullying is strongest predictor of whether an

i di id l ill b ll !

Independent VariablesCoefficient

(Beta)

Perception of bullying (index) .42 *

individual will bully!

p y g ( )

Actual bullying norm at school (index median) .09 *

Gender (male vs. female) .10 *

Age .10 *

Race (white vs minority) -.05 *

School population size .01 ns

R (% hi h l) 03Race (% white at school) .03 ns

Students with free lunch (%) -.00 ns

Student/teacher ratio at school -.03 ns

aIncludes only schools where at least 50% of students responded overall from the grades surveyed.*Coefficient is significant at p < .001.ns Coefficient is not significant, p > .05. Craig and Perkins

Youth Health & Safety ProjectHobart and Wm Smith Colleges

Page 11: 2008 National Conference on the Social Norms Approach, Hyatt … · New Jersey Secondary Schools Applying the Social Norms ModelApplying the Social Norms Model to Adolescent Violence

Sample Social Norms PostersSample Social Norms Posters

(school names have been changed)(school names have been changed)

Page 12: 2008 National Conference on the Social Norms Approach, Hyatt … · New Jersey Secondary Schools Applying the Social Norms ModelApplying the Social Norms Model to Adolescent Violence
Page 13: 2008 National Conference on the Social Norms Approach, Hyatt … · New Jersey Secondary Schools Applying the Social Norms ModelApplying the Social Norms Model to Adolescent Violence
Page 14: 2008 National Conference on the Social Norms Approach, Hyatt … · New Jersey Secondary Schools Applying the Social Norms ModelApplying the Social Norms Model to Adolescent Violence
Page 15: 2008 National Conference on the Social Norms Approach, Hyatt … · New Jersey Secondary Schools Applying the Social Norms ModelApplying the Social Norms Model to Adolescent Violence
Page 16: 2008 National Conference on the Social Norms Approach, Hyatt … · New Jersey Secondary Schools Applying the Social Norms ModelApplying the Social Norms Model to Adolescent Violence
Page 17: 2008 National Conference on the Social Norms Approach, Hyatt … · New Jersey Secondary Schools Applying the Social Norms ModelApplying the Social Norms Model to Adolescent Violence

Impact of Social Norms Intervention at Five New Jersey Schools

11

11.5

2.7

2.8

y

Intervention Program reduces perceptions and actual bullying

behavior!

10.5

11

2.6

Mea

n

Inde

x M

ean behavior!

10

2.5

Nor

m In

dex

g B

ehav

ior I

Actual Bullying BehaviorPerceived Bullying Norm

9.5

2.3

2.4

Perc

eive

d N

onal

Bul

lyin

g Perceived Bullying Norm

92.2

Pers

o

*3 of 5 schools completed 2008 survey

8.52.12006 (n=2362) 2007 (n=2762) 2008* (n=1530)

Craig and PerkinsYouth Health & Safety ProjectHobart and Wm Smith Colleges

Page 18: 2008 National Conference on the Social Norms Approach, Hyatt … · New Jersey Secondary Schools Applying the Social Norms ModelApplying the Social Norms Model to Adolescent Violence

Raw Impact DataRaw Impact DataPerceived NormPerceived Norm

2006 2007 2008

School A 13 12.6 10.7

School B 10.6 10.3 8.1

School C 11 5 9 2School C 11.5 9.2

School D 9.4 9.4

School E 10.7 10.2 8.4

All Schools 11 10.4 9.4

Personal Behavior

2006 (n=2362) 2007 (n=2762) 2008* (n=1530)

School A 3.1 2.4

School B 2.3 2.4 1.5

School C 3 2

School D 2.4 2.3

School E 2.9 3.2 2.5

All Schools 2.7 2.6 2.3

*3 of 5 schools completed 2008 survey

Craig and PerkinsYouth Health & Safety ProjectHobart and Wm Smith Colleges