2012 crime victimization survey - thailand institute of ... · 2012 crime victimization survey...

2012 Crime Victimization

Survey

PHILIPPINE STATISTICS AUTHORITY

1

OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION

• Introduction

• Objectives

• Sampling Design

• Training

• Organizational Set-up

• Quality Assurance

• Budget

• Questionnaire

• Preliminary Results

2

INTRODUCTION

• Crime statistics in the philippines is generated mostly from administrative based reporting system.

• Occasionally, NAPOLCOM conduct crime

related surveys in selected areas

• Crime victimization survey can provide

information that will add up to statistics and

data from police records.

3

INTRODUCTION

The Philippines is signatory to various international

conventions and declarations to promote and

maintain peace and security within its territory and

across nations. These are:

1) the 1985 UN Declaration of Basic Principles of

Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power,

2) UN Convention Against Transnational Organized

Crime,

4

INTRODUCTION

3) Universal Declaration of Human Rights,

4) Convention on the Rights of Children,

5) Beijing Platform of Action,

6) Millennium Declaration.

5

2012 CRIME VICTIMIZATION SURVEY

(What are the benefits of crime victimization

survey? )

1. It provide our criminal justice officials with pertinent

information to help them plan, evaluate and analyze

our present criminal justice system;

2. It provide a more complete picture (data gap of

administrative data) crime since this survey takes

into consideration both the instances of reported

and unreported crimes;

3. To provide information of victimization risks;6


(What are the benefits of crime

victimization survey? )

3. To provide data on the nature of crimes that are

not reported to the police and reasons for non-

reporting;

4. To provide information on the safety measures

being practiced in the community.

5. It can served as benchmark for crime statistics

and; and

6. It could serve as validation data for administrative

data on crime.7


Sampling Design:

The 2012 Crime Victimization Survey covers all

regions in the country. In each region, a stratified,

three-stage sampling design was employed. At

the first stage, primary sampling units (PSUs)

were selected with probability proportional to the

estimated number of households from the 2010

Census of Population and Housing (CPH).

8


Sampling Design:

At the second stage, enumeration areas (EAs)

were selected within sampled PSUs with

probability proportional to size. At the third stage,

housing units were selected with equal probability

within sampled EAs.

9


Sampling Design:

Sampling Frame – 2010 Census of

Population and Housing. Each sample hhs was

visited and any responsible member of the hhs

were interviewed using the Labor Force Survey

Questionnaire.

10


Sampling Design:

At most 30 sample housing units were enumerated

per sample EA. Generally, all sample households

in the sample housing units were interviewed

except for HU with more than 3 households, in

such a case only 3 hhs were interviewed.

The eligible respondent for CVS are members of

the household 15 years old and over who had

been a victim of crime.11


Respondent Selection (Challenges):

At the household level, two types of selection was done

before October 22, 2012. The following is considered in the

selection of respondent:

1. All household member who are victim of crime were

selected for interview (Certainty).

2. If no household member is a victim of crime only one

respondent is selected for the question in the security

section.

October 22, 2012 onwards all members of the household

15 years old over were interviewed.

12


Training:

• First Level Training (Manila)

• Second Level Training (17 Regional Offices)

• Third Level Training (Provincial Offices)

13


Organizational Set-up for CVS

Administrator Steering Committee

Household Statistics Department Director

(Survey Director)

Central Office Supervisors

Regional Directors (RDs) Regional Supervisors

Provincial Statistics Officers (PSOs)Provincial Supervisors/Focal Persons

(Provincial Stat/DSO/SCO)

Field Interviewers

((DSO/SCO/Statistical Staff/Hired)

14


Quality Assurance (Challenges):

The Regional Directors, Provincial Statistics

Officers, and the Regional Supervisors (RS)

supervised the field operation.

The Provincial Statisticians or their designated

alternates who served as trainers in the third-level

training were the CVS focal persons in their

respective provinces. They supervised for the entire

duration of the survey. 15


Quality Assurance:

While in the sample areas, the Supervisors carried

out the following:

- observed/attended interviews to ensure that

these are properly carried out;

- scrutiny of accomplished questionnaires to

ascertain completeness and consistency of

entries; and

- reinterviewing sample households using

Reinterview/Observation Form16


BUDGET

17

Challenges/barrier

It is not Designated Statistics

It is not in the Philippine Statistics Development Plan

Rider or Stand alone survey

Low priority

18

Data Processing

Manual Processing

Data Encoding

Data Cleaning (Challenge)

Data Evaluation

Weights Generation (Challenges)

Tabulation

19

21

Table 1. Household response rate by region (Unweighted) : Philippines, 2012

Region Completed Interview Eligible Household Response rate

Philippines 43,152 43,547 99.1

NCR 11.3 11.3 99.4

CAR 4.3 4.3 99.6

I - Ilocos Region 5.6 5.6 99.5

II - Cagayan Valley 5.0 4.9 99.7

III - Central Luzon 7.8 7.8 98.6

IVA - CALABARZON 10.2 10.2 99.6

IVB - MIMAROPA 3.7 3.7 99.7

V- Bicol 5.5 5.5 99.6

VI - Western Visayas 7.0 7.0 99.7

VII - Central Visayas 6.3 6.3 99.4

22

Table 1. Household response rate by region (Unweighted) : Philippines, 2012

Region Completed Interview Eligible Household Response rate

Philippines 43,152 43,547 99.1

VII - Central Visayas 6.3 6.3 99.4

VIII - Eastern Visayas 5.4 5.4 99.5IX - ZamboangaPeninsula 4.2 4.2 99.7

X - Northern Mindanao 4.4 4.4 99.6

XI - Davao 5.6 5.6 98.5

XII - SOCCSKSARGEN 5.2 5.2 99.2

Caraga 4.0 3.9 99.5

ARMM 4.4 4.7 92.8

Preliminary Tabulation

23

Percent distribution of household members 15 years old and over by sex and region: Philippines, 2012

Percent distribution of household members 15 years old and over by age group and region: Philippines, 2012

Percent distribution of households who had been victims of vehicle theft and /or burglary by region: Philippines, 2012

Percent distribution of household members 15 years old and over who had been victims of any crimes by region: Philippines, 2012

Preliminary Tabulation

Proportion of household members 15 years old and over about your feeling of security in the area where you live by region: Philippines, 2012

Proportion of household members 15 years old and over about your feeling of security at home by region: Philippines, 2012

Proportion of household members 15 years old and over about how do you keep your house protected by region: Philippines, 2012

Proportion of household members 15 years old and over about community crime prevention measures by region: Philippines, 2012

24

RegionNumber of households

Number of household with

Vehicles

Victims of Vehicle theft

Victims of Burglary

Victims of Vehicle Theft and/or

Burglary

Victims of Vehicle Theft and Burglary

Not been victims of any household

crimes

Philippines 21,458 532 151 825 952 23 17,915

NCR 12.8 12.0 24.0 14.7 15.9 26.7 12.0

CAR 1.8 0.6 0.4 1.4 1.3 - 1.7

I - Ilocos Region 5.6 4.0 2.0 1.8 1.9 - 6.1

II - Cagayan Valley 3.7 3.0 1.9 1.7 1.8 - 3.8

III - Central Luzon 11.0 10.0 14.1 9.3 10.2 3.0 11.3

IVA - CALABARZON 13.2 22.2 18.2 14.3 14.9 15.2 13.1

IVB - MIMAROPA 3.3 3.9 2.9 3.4 3.4 - 3.3

V- Bicol 5.7 6.7 4.0 6.1 5.7 8.9 5.6

VI - Western Visayas 8.0 3.4 4.9 6.7 6.2 12.6 8.5

VII - Central Visayas 7.4 6.4 5.1 9.6 9.0 2.5 7.2

VIII - Eastern Visayas 4.6 1.4 3.3 4.8 4.6 1.9 4.7IX - Zamboanga Peninsula 3.6 2.7 1.1 3.3 2.9 3.8 3.7

X - Northern Mindanao 4.5 7.6 6.0 4.2 4.4 6.6 4.3

XI - Davao 4.8 4.6 5.2 7.2 6.8 10.4 4.8

XII - SOCCSKSARGEN 4.4 6.1 2.1 6.0 5.3 7.1 4.5

Caraga 2.6 3.7 1.3 2.4 2.3 1.5 2.5

ARMM 2.9 1.7 3.2 3.3 3.4 - 2.725

Table 6. Percent distribution of household members 15 years old and over who had been victims of any crimes by region: Philippines, 2012

◦ USE of Data For evaluation/comparison of crime statistics that come from administrative data

Served as input on policy and program formulation on unreported crimes,

For research purposes like study on relation between crime rate and perception on security, program of community on crime prevention.

◦ Note: Other characteristics will come from◦ Labor Force Survey (Occupation, Highest Grade Completed)

26

Other survey that produce crime statistics◦ Violence against women

2008 and 2013 National Demographic and Health Survey/Women Safety Module

◦ Corruption (bribery)

2010 and 2013 Annual Poverty Survey

www.psa.gov.ph

27

http://www.psa.gov.ph/

THANK YOU!

28

2012 crime victimization survey - thailand institute of ... · 2012 crime victimization survey...

Documents