2012 jan parking study
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
1/34
LEVEL 1
PARKING DECK
FEASIBILITY STUDY
&
PARKING PROGRAM PLAN
VILLAGE OF PATCHOGUE, NY
FINAL REPORT
January 10, 2012
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
2/34
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction .. 1.
1.1 Introduction 1.1.2 Purpose of Study 1.
1.3 Study Area 1.
1.4 Field Studies 1.1.5 Community and Stakeholder Input 2.
1.6 Acknowledgements 2.
2.0 Parking Space Supply ... 3.
2.1 Municipal Parking Supply 3.
2.2 On-Street Parking 3.
2.3 Off-Street Parking 3.2.4 Total Municipal Supply Study Area 5.
3.0 Parking Studies . 6.
3.1 Parking Space Occupancy 6.
3.2 Parking Durations Along Main Street 8.
3.3 Parking Study Conditions 9.
4.0 Proposed CBD Redevelopment .... 10.
4.1 Parking Demand Model Swezey's Block Redevelopment 10.4.2 Parking Impacts - Swezey's Redevelopment Site 10.
4.3 Parking Supply & Demand Models 11.
4.4 Latent Parking Demand 12.
5.0 Parking Improvement Strategies ... 13.
5.1 Operational Strategies 13.
5.2 Physical Strategies 16.
6.0 Parking Deck Options 19.
6.1 Site Selection 19.6.2 Service Areas 19.
4-site Service Area Illustrations 20.
6.3 Site Comparison / Pros and Cons 21.
Continued
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
3/34
7.0 Parking Program Plan... 22.
7.1 A Tiered Approach 22.
TABLE 1 Parking Improvement Strategies 23.
7.2 Recommendations 24.
LIST OF APPENDIXES
APPENDIX A Parking Study Area Municipal Parking Supply
APPENDIX B Occupancy Count Key Map
APPENDIX C Occupancy Count Summary
APPENDIX D-1 Parking Demand Model Saturday Condition
APPENDIX D-2 Parking Demand Model Weekday Condition
APPENDIX E-1 Parking Supply & Demand Model / Saturday Condition
APPENDIX E-2 Parking Supply & Demand Model / Weekday Condition
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
4/34
1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 IntroductionThe Patchogue Village Business Improvement District (PVBID) has engaged Level GAssociates, parking consultants, for the purpose of preparing a Level 1 parking deckfeasibility study. A Level 1 feasibility study is not as detailed as a feasibility studyneeded for bond financing but will provide a basic understanding of local parkingconditions and will identify practical parking choices moving forward.
1.2 Purpose of StudyThe purpose of this study is to:
Examine current parking conditions; Prepare recommendations designed to offset parking space deficiencies or
irregular parking patterns; Identify and evaluate potential sites for parking deck development in the central
business district (CBD); Prepare a parking program plan linking study findings with physical and / or
operational changes to the current parking system; Prepare cost estimates and a report summarizing our findings and conclusions.
1.3 Study AreaParking studies were generally limited the CBD that is roughly defined by Lake and OakStreets on the north, Church and Terry Streets on the south, Rider Avenue on the east,and West Avenue on the west.
Appendix A is a map of the study area showing the municipal parking supply and certainlandmarks in the CBD. As indicated in Appendix A, the study area is roughly dividedinto four quadrants centered on the intersection of Main Street and North Ocean Avenueand defined by Main Street (Montauk Highway) in the east west direction and North /South Ocean Avenue in the north south direction.
1.4 Field StudiesFor the purposes of this report, we conducted a series of field studies including but notlimited to: an inventory of the municipal parking supply in the study area; occupancycounts of all municipal parking facilities between noon and 10PM on Thursday 21 July2011 and Saturday 23 July 2011; spot occupancy counts on Thursday 11 August 2011,and; parking duration recordings conducted along Main Street on Thursday 21 July 2011.
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
5/34
2
It should be noted that during our field studies the Patchogue Theatre was running thefollowing scheduled events:
July 21 Monty Pythons Spamalot Shows at 2:00PM & 8:00PMJuly 23 Monty Pythons Spamalot Shows at 3:00PM & 8:30PM
August 11 No Events Scheduled
The selection of primary study dates that coincided with Patchogue Theatre show dateswas done so at the request of the PVBID. The purpose of conducting spot counts on adark theatre date was done to compare parking volumes between dark dates and showdates. The selection of summertime study dates was also done so at the request of thePVBID reflecting their assertion that that typical peak conditions in downtown Patchogueare likely to occur in the summer season.
1.5 Community and Stakeholder Input
A draft version of this report was submitted on October 24, 2011 and presented inPowerpoint format to:
the PVBID and its membership on November 8, 2011; the Patchogue Village Board (public invited) on November 14, 2011; and the Patchogue Village Planning Board on December 1, 2011.
On December 6, we reconvened with the PVBID to discuss feedback from the public andstakeholders and final report preparation.
1.6 Acknowledgements
We are indebted to Mr. Thomas Ford, Mr. Dennis Smith, Mr. Joel Peck, and theremainder of the PVBID for providing input, feedback, and background information thatwas essential to the preparation of this report.
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
6/34
3
2.0 PARKING SPACE SUPPLY2.1 Municipal Parking Supply
As of August 2011, the municipal parking space supply in the study area consisted of1,733 parking spaces located in parking lots and on the streets of the CBD study area.Parking is free of charge but certain regulations and time restrictions have been institutedover the years to encourage fair and orderly parking patterns in the downtown area.
2.2 On-Street ParkingThe on-street parking supply consists of 318 parking spaces composed as follows:
Two Hour Limit 191No Time Limit 100
15 Minute Time Limit 15Handicap Parking 5Loading Zones 530 Minute Limit 2
Total On-Street 318
As indicated, most on-street parking spaces in the CBD are two-hour limit spaces and areintended for use by downtown shoppers and visitors. Also, about one-half of all the on-street spaces are located on Main Street. There are 156 on-street spaces on Main Streetbetween West Avenue and Rider Avenue. Main Street includes 2 hour limit, 15 minute
limit, handicap, and loading zone spaces.
The on-street supply includes 17 fifteen minute and thirty minute limit spaces. Thesespaces are usually established near post offices and popular take-out food destinationswhere very short parking visits are common. No time limit parking areas are for use byany parking category and are sometimes utilized by downtown residents and employees.No time limit spaces can be found on South Street, Railroad Avenue, Maple Avenue,Church Street, and Terry Street (across from the new Art Space Building).
2.3 Off-Street ParkingThe off-street parking supply consists of 1,415 parking spaces composed as follows:
No Time Limit 996Two Hour Limit 310Handicap Parking 7230 Minute Time Limit 2215 Minute Limit 15
Total Off-Street 1,415
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
7/34
4
As indicated, most off-street parking spaces in the CBD are no time limit spaces andmany of these are used by downtown employees as well as shoppers and visitors whoprefer not to be bound by a two hour time limit.
The following chart summarizes the off-street parking supply on a lot by lot basis:
As indicated, there are 12 public parking lots ranging in size from 36 to 213 parkingspaces. Parking lots are located in each quadrant of the study area and are generallysituated behind businesses and commercial establishments along the Main Street andOcean Avenue corridors. Please refer to Appendix A for lot numbers and locations.
Time limits in the various parking lots have been established over the years in response tothe prevailing parking demand in the vicinity of each lot. In addition to time limits, someparking lots contain specially marked spaces where parking is prohibited between thehours of 4AM and 10AM, a restriction intended to keep downtown employees fromutilizing parking spaces intended for downtown shoppers and visitors. These parkingstalls are marked with red paint. In general, parking spaces in Patchogue municipal lotsare readily discerned by the color of paint used to mark the stall:
White Paint Short term parking; 2 hours or lessRed Paint 2 Hour Limit; No parking 4AM to 10AMYellow Paint No Time Limit; No RestrictionsBlue Paint Handicap
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
8/34
5
It should be noted that the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) onlyrecommends white or blue paint for parking space markings. The MUTCD is apublication of the United States Federal Highway Administrations and is the recognizedsource for traffic control standards in the State of New York.
2.4
Total Municipal Parking Supply
The following chart is a breakdown of all municipal parking spaces in the Patchogueparking study area:
On-Street Off-Street % ofParking Parking Totals Total
No Time Limit 100 996 1,096 63.3%Two Hour Limit 191 310 501 28.9Handicap Parking 5 72 77 4.415 Minute Time Limit 15 15 30 1.7
30 Minute Limit 2 22 24 1.4Loading Zones 5 (Note 1) 5 0.3 .
Total On-Street 318 1,415 1,733 100.0%
Note 1 There are a number of loading areas, dumpster areas, and easements located throughout the off-
street parking supply that are not quantified in this analysis.
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
9/34
6
3.0 PARKING STUDIES
3.1 Parking Space Occupancy
The number of cars parked in municipal parking spaces and other selected parking areaswere counted at 12 noon, 2PM, 4PM, 6PM, 8PM, and 10PM on Thursday July 21 andSaturday July 23, 2011. There were matinee and evening performances of the playSpamalot running at the Patchogue Theatre on both of these count dates. In order togauge downtown parking space occupancy on a typical non-theatre day, we alsoconducted spot occupancy counts on Thursday 11 August 2011.
Appendix B shows the individual parking facilities that were counted during our fieldstudies and Appendix C is a summary of the results of those counts.
In downtown areas, it is generally considered that a parking facility can only be expectedto operate at 90% of capacity due to the constant in-flow and out-flow of automobiles andfrom a planning perspective 90% occupancy is a significant threshold. Parking areas thatare observed to be parked at or above the 90% threshold are considered full and clearlyrepresent the highest demand parking zones.
During our studies, the highest recorded occupancy in all study area public parkingspaces occurred at 2PM on Thursday July 21. At this time, 1,170 cars were parked in1,733 spaces an overall occupancy rate of 67.5%. The parking facilities that wereparked in excess of 90% at this Thursday 2PM peak are highlighted in orange on thefollowing illustration:
Facilities in Excess of 90% at Study Peak (Thursday @ 2PM)
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
10/34
7
Peak parking occupancies recorded on each of the study dates were as follows:
7/21 2PM Theatre Weekday 67.5%8/18 1PM Non-Theatre Weekday 54.4%7/21 4PM Theatre Saturday 43.8%
In CBD parking studies in suburban centers similar to Patchogue it is common to findSaturday occupancy rates that are significantly lower than weekday study dates. This isbecause Monday through Friday offices and businesses in the CBD are closed.
The following illustrations indicate CBD parking facilities occupied in excess of 90% ona non-theatre weekday (below), and; parking facilities occupied in excess of 90% at anytime during the study (top of page 8).
Parking Facilities in Excess of 90% on Non-Theatre Weekday
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
11/34
8
As derived from the previous three illustrations, the areas of downtown Patchogue withthe highest parking demand are: Main Street; the Northeast Quadrant and the SoutheastQuadrant.
3.2 Parking Durations Along Main Street
The parking time limit along Main Street is two hours maximum, but there are some
spaces with shorter time limits, such as 15 minute limit spaces in front of the Post Office.Parking spaces with time limits of two hours or less are considered short term parkingand are generally intended for downtown shoppers and visitors.
The continued turnover of short term spaces is considered a key component of a healthydowntown parking program. Short term spaces that are occupied beyond the posted timelimit by overtime parkers can severely reduce parking volume and availability often inthe most convenient parking areas.
Consider a block side with 10 two hour limit parking spaces. In theory, this block sideshould be able to accommodate a minimum of 40 parking visits between 9AM and 5PM
(4 turns per space x 10 spaces = 40 parking visits). In practice, the number of parkingvisits can be much higher as many parking durations will be one hour or less.
However, if only three of the ten spaces are occupied by overtime parkers, eachoccupying his space for six hours, the effective number of parking visits is minimallyreduced from 40 to 34, a reduction of at least 15%.
Parking Facilities in Excess of 90% at Any Time During Study
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
12/34
9
We measured the parking durations of cars parked in 2 hour limit spaces along MainStreet on Thursday July 21 between the hours of 12 noon and 6PM. After 6PM the 2hour parking limit is no longer in effect. The results were as follows:
North Side of Main Street: 17.0% of all cars parked longer than 2 hours
South Side of Main Street: 24.4% of all cars parked longer than 2 hours
Overall, it is calculated that 21.5% of all cars parking on Main Street park for longer than2 hours a rate of 1 in 5.
3.3 Parking Study Conditions
Weather- Parking studies should be conducted during periods of time when weatherconditions will neither affect nor interrupt the normal flow of automobile traffic. For thisreason parking studies should not be conducted during periods of inclement weather.Weather conditions during our field studies were as follows:
Low Temp High Temp Precipitation
July 21, 2011 77.0 82.0 0.00July 23, 2011 84.0 93.9 0.00August 11, 2011 66.9 81.0 0.00
As indicated, there was no precipitation and temperatures were typical of the summerseason. The temperature on Saturday 7/23 was in the low to mid 90s for most of theafternoon but it is not uncommon to encounter temperatures in the 90s on Long Island inthe month of July and the study data is therefore representative of typical conditions.
Theatre Event The Patchogue Theatre runs shows and events throughout the year, somemore heavily attended than others. During our studies attendance at the Spamalotshows was about 2/3rds of capacity and peaked at about 72% during the Saturdayevening performance. It is our understanding that this level of attendance is typical for aPatchogue Theatre show.
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
13/34
10
4.0 PROPOSED CBD REDEVELOPMENT4.1 Parking Demand Model Swezeys Block RedevelopmentWe prepared shared parking demand models for the Swezeys Block Redevelopmentusing the following building program provided by the PVBID:
240 Rental Townhouse Units;51 Apartment Rental Units;41,100 SF Grade Level Retail;18,000 SF Offices (31 West Main Street);5,000 SF Restaurant (31 West Main Street)
Alternate models were prepared to reflect a Saturday versus Weekday condition. We
have assumed that the Townhouse units will have 1.0 reserved parking spaces per unit aswe understand this is part of the developers program. According to the models, peakparking demand and peak demand times are estimated to be:
Saturday Peak 561 car demand @ 8PM Weekday Peak 537 car demand @ 2PM
In addition to the new redevelopment uses, the above parking demand estimates includecars that are currently utilizing the 174 space municipal lot that will be displaced by theredevelopment. Copies of the Swezeys Block Redevelopment parking demand modelsare provided in Appendix D.
4.2 Parking Impacts - Swezeys Redevelopment Site
As indicated in 4.1 above, parking demand in the Swezeys redevelopment block isexpected to be in the 537 to 561 space range after completion of the building program. Itis important to note that this demand includes cars currently parking in the existingmunicipal lot within the redevelopment block and patronizing nearby establishments suchas the Brick House restaurant and Bank of America.
If all the estimated parking demand were to be accommodated on the redevelopmentblock, the resulting on-site supply would have to be in the 537 to 561 space range. Wehave heard reports that the redevelopment parking supply is expected to be 492 parkingspaces. This suggests a potential redevelopment parking shortfall of 45 to 69 spacesduring the weekday and Saturday peak conditions, respectively.
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
14/34
11
4.3 Parking Supply & Demand Models
By their very nature, redevelopment projects occur in areas of towns that are strugglingand underutilized and they tend to be efficient because there is existing infrastructure inplace to help support the project, including but not limited to roads, utilities, and parking.
We have been involved in a number of successful and award winning redevelopmentprojects, including the much heralded Epsteins redevelopment project in Morristown, NJ,and they all share a common theme. the local government has helped to facilitate theredevelopment process by recognizing a shared parking concept and / or assisting in theplanning and development of a practical and efficient parking program. Part of thisefficiency comes from crediting a portion of typically vacant public parking to theredevelopment parking supply formula.
We have identified four public parkingareas that are within a very short walking
distance of the Swezeys Blockredevelopment that are excellentcandidates to act in this capacity (insetright).
These parking areas are: the 38 spacemunicipal lot that connects the Firehouseparking lot to N. Ocean Avenue; thesouthernmost row of 25 parking spaces inthe Firehouse parking lot; 15 parkingspaces in the north portion of RailroadAvenue; and 85 spaces in thenorthernmost portion of the Church Streetlot.
As a result of the occupancy countsperformed as part of this study, we areable to accurately estimate the number oftypically available parking spaces in thesefour parking areas during various times ofthe day and night for both weekday andSaturday conditions. In addition, becausethese counts were conducted on days with theatre performances, the CBD peak conditionis factored in.
The following table is a summary of estimated parking supply and demand for theSwezeys redevelopment block using the building program described in 4.1, new parkingspaces accompanying the redevelopment, and available spaces in the four public parkingareas illustrated above.
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
15/34
12
Weekday Peak (2PM) Saturday Peak (8PM)
Redevelopment Spaces1 492 492Available Spaces in 4 Areas 78 105
Projected Parking Supply 570 597
Projected Parking Demand (537) (561)
Surplus or (Deficit) 33 36
Recognizing that the above parking demand projections include a 10% safety factor, weestimate that the redevelopment program as described herein is feasible. A more detailedaccounting of the parking supply and demand models can be found in Appendix E.
4.4 Latent Parking Demand
We understand that there is about 45,000 square feet of vacant floor space on the westside of the Patchogue CBD the same side of the CBD as the redevelopment project. Ifand when these floor areas become occupied there will be some amount of new parkingdemand associated with the new businesses.
This latent parking demand may surface in the future and place stress on the localparking supply. However, until the volume and nature of the new businesses are knownit is very difficult to forecast what the actual future impacts will be. It is also difficult toforecast changes that will take place in the areas surrounding these new establishments.For example, if a business is now a restaurant and is replaced by a jewelry store or a bank,the resulting change in the local parking patterns will need to be factored in.
This report includes a range of recommendations designed to improve the Patchogueparking experience. The first tier of recommendations are low cost to implement, butmay yield significant parking improvements. We estimate that these Tier 1recommendations will have a material impact on parking conditions and may very wellserve the Patchogue CBD quite well for a number of years in the near term.
This report also includes Tier 2 (parking lot expansion) solutions to be considered ifparking problems resist after the Tier 1 recommendations are implemented and Tier 3(multi level parking) parking programs that, we recommend, should only be consideredafter the redevelopment program has been built and occupied for at least 18 months.
This measured approach assures that village resources and capital are expendedefficiently and on an as needed basis.
1293 residential reserved spaces + 108 on-site public spaces + 65 space public lot on Lake Street + 26 newon-street spaces (source: Tritec)
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
16/34
13
5.0 PARKING IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIESThis section identifies a number of strategies that can be employed to improve the
Patchogue parking experience. Operational strategies are simple and inexpensive toimplement but can have a profound positive impact on parking conditions. Physicalstrategies can range from simple and inexpensive to involved and costly.
5.1 Operational Strategies
a. Create more long term parking in Lot 3
Lots 3 and 4 are popular destinations for long term parkers and we suspect that manydowntown employees park in these lots while they are at work. During time periodswhen Lots 3 and 4 were experiencing 90% occupancy rates in the no time limit parking
sections, the two hour limit spaces in Lot 3 were largely unused. There are 74 two hourlimit spaces in Lot 3 (behind Ralphs) and during our studies the highest observedoccupancy in these spaceswas 38 cars parked (51.3%)and the average occupancywas 26 cars parked (35.1%).The inset illustration showsa row of 12 two hour limitspaces in Lot 3 that can beconverted to no timelimit spaces to relievepressure on the employeeparking supply in this area.
b. Reduce the parking time limit on Main Street from 2 hours to 60 or 90
minutes
As discussed in section 3.2 our studies have indicated that 1 out of every 5 cars parkingon Main Street parks in excess of the posted 2 hour time limit. This is one of the reasonswhy parking problems persist along this active corridor. But, in many active businessdistricts, time limits for the most convenient on-street parking spaces are 60 or 90minutes. This makes convenient parking available to the maximum number of shoppersand visitors.
There are about 140 two hour time limit spaces along Main Street and the time limit is ineffect for the 9 hour period between 9AM and 6PM. In theory, this arrangement willallow for a minimum of 630 Main Street parking visits: 140 spaces x 9 hours 2.0 hours= 630 parking visits.
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
17/34
14
By reducing the time limit from two hours to 60 minutes, the minimum number of MainStreet parking visits will double from 630 to 1260: 140 spaces x 9 hours 1.0 hours =1,260 parking visits. By reducing the time limit from two hours to 90 minutes, theminimum number of Main Street parking visits will increase by over 200 parking visitsper day from 630 to 840: 140 spaces x 9 hours 1.5 hours = 840 parking visits.
c.1 Create Turnover on Main Street - Enforce Parking Time Limits
During our three days of parking studies, we only noted one parking ticket issued to aparked vehicle on Main Street, even though it was determined that 1 out of every 5 carswas parked illegally.
A municipality must walk a fine line when it comes to enforcement too muchenforcement can promote bitter feelings from parkers and the village may be perceived asbeing overly antagonistic. This situation usually does not sit well with downtownmerchants either. Not enough enforcement can lead to parking abuses, especially
rampant overtime parking violators.
A reasonable enforcement routine should be based on a minimum number of checks perday a minimum of three or four checks per day for short-term (2 hour or less limit)parking areas, and a minimum of one or two checks per day for permit parking areas, ifapplicable.
There are several methods to enforce overtime parking for on-street parking, but the mostcommon method employed is chalking tires. Higher technology methods such asentering license plate numbers and wheel positions into handheld computers or vehiclemounted license plate recognition systems may also be employed, although the latter canbe quite costly to implement.
Because of the high importance of creating parking turnover along Main Street, it isrecommended that chalking of tires and subsequent chalk checks be conducted at leastthree times per day along Main Street and South Ocean Avenue north of Church Street.
c.2 Create Turnover on Main Street Install Parking Meters
As discussed above, the enforcement of parking time limits along Main Street and othershort term (two hours or less) parking areas is a key component of creating turnover andimproving parking conditions in downtown Patchogue. However, this will involve astepped-up program of chalking tires (or recording license plate numbers and wheelpositions) and issuing tickets to all violators. Such programs can sometimes be perceivedas unfriendly.
An alternate method of creating turnover and reducing the need for an aggressiveenforcement program is to use parking meters to control the coveted spaces along MainStreet, South Ocean Avenue, and perhaps other areas. The meter will add an element ofself-enforcement as parkers will note their parking expiration time at the meter. New
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
18/34
15
meter technologies such as pay by cell phone and credit card options are makingmetered parking more user friendly. Pay by cell phone customers can even be sentautomatic text messages when their meter time is about to expire and can extend theirmeter time by an appropriate response to the text message.
d. Add some 30 minute limit spaces in Lot 2 near the Library
Many library visitors only require a short parking visit because customers are theresimply to drop off an expiring book, pick up a specific item, or perform a reference check.For this reason we recommend that about 6 or 8 parking spaces in Lot 2 adjacent to therear entrance of the library be converted to 30 minute limit parking.
e. Develop Parking Lot Designations
In many towns, municipal parking areas are given a series of names or alpha / numericdesignations such as Elm Street Lot,
Lot 4, or Lot D. This assists motoristsin locating parking lots and allows localbusinesses to direct their customers to themost convenient parking areas.
After a naming pattern has been selectedsignage should be installed at each lotindicating its name and the parkingregulations within. An example of such asign is shown in the inset illustration.
f. Prepare and Print a Parking in Patchogue Pamphlet
After the lots have been named and signed, it is recommended that a simple pamphlet beprepared and printed that describes the various on-street and off-street public parkingareas in Patchogue. The pamphlet should include the names, locations, regulations, timelimits, and fees charged for each parking facility, if appropriate. A simple map of theCBD with the parking areas outlined should also be included in the pamphlet.
The pamphlets should be made available to all public facilities, institutions, and localbusinesses to hand out to customers. They can also be mailed to local residents.
g. Prepare and Implement a Wayfinding Sign Program
The inset illustration shows afamily of wayfinding signsrecently installed in the townof Newton, NJ. These signswere installed to improveawareness and circulation
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
19/34
16
and have been well received by local residents and businesses. The total cost of theprogram, which included the installation of over 30 signs, was less than $15,000. Asimilar program in Patchogue would be a natural accompaniment to items (e) and (f)above.
5.2 Physical Strategies
a.1 Modify access area between Lots 2 and 3 Version 1
The access area between Lots 2 and 3 organizes traffic flow between Terry Street, Lot 2,and Lot 3. It functions well but its generous dimensions and a planting island displace alot of potential parking spaces. The following sketch indicates that a net gain of about 40spaces can be realized by removing the planting island between the two lots.
There are some dumpsters located on the east side of the planting island that would haveto be relocated as part of this concept. These dumpsters should be placed in a dumpsterenclosure similar to the one in the Church Street lot.
a.2 Modify access area between Lots 2 and 3 Version 2
An alternate version of the above plan that does not displace as much of the existinglandscaping is shown at the top of the following page. This alternate plan would still
yield an additional 25 spaces.
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
20/34
17
b. New Spaces North Side of Terry Street
We understand that the village is exploring the installation of about 20 new parallelparking spaces along the north side of Terry Street in the area just south of Lots 3 and 4.This is certainly a worthwhile strategy because these spaces will be inexpensive todevelop (paint striping and signage) and will be located in a relatively high demandparking area.
c. Purchase Land to Expand Lot 8 (behind pork store)
At one ofourmeetingswith thePVBID itwasmentionedthat oneproperty
adjacent toLot 8(behind thepork store)may beavailable for purchase. Adding public parking in this area may be worthwhile because ofits proximity to high parking demand areas and the redevelopment block. The insetsketch indicates that a maximum of about 42 additional spaces can be added by
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
21/34
18
purchasing this property and using it to expand the adjacent municipal parking lot.According to zillow.com the value of the subject property, 15 Oak Street, is about$366,000.
d. Purchase Land to Expand Lot 1 (Church Street Lot)
We have been asked to estimate how many parking spaces could be gained by purchasingthe old bank drive through and adjacent houses along Church Street to expand theexisting 213 space Church Street lot. The following sketch indicates that the existing 213space parking lot can be expanded to a capacity of about 358, a gain of 145 spaces.
Using prices listed on zillow.com it is estimated that the total value of the five propertiesneeded to accomplish this parking lot expansion is about $1.1 million.
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
22/34
19
6.0 PARKING DECK OPTIONS6.1 Site Selection
There are a number of factors that need to be considered when selecting a parking garagesite. For example: the site should have good access for vehicles and pedestrians; the siteshould be large enough to fit an efficient parking structure; the site should not be overlyencumbered with utilities or poor soils; and so forth.
One of the most important factors in locating a parking deck is that it should beproximate to areas where high parking demand exists.
We reviewed the study area to determine potential sites for future parking deckdevelopment. Based on site ownership, site dimensions, and proximity to high parking
demand areas, we considered the following four sites:
Lot 1 Municipal parking lot behind JRs Lot 2 Municipal parking lot behind Library Lot 6 Municipal parking lot behind Congregational Church Lot 7 Municipal parking lot behind Blums
6.2 Service Areas
The service area of a parking deck is defined as the 85thpercentile distance that users ofthe deck will walk after parking their cars. In suburban centers like Patchogue, thisdistance is estimated to be about 725 feet. That is, 85% of the parkers using a parkingdeck in Patchogue will walk 725 feet or less to reach their destination.
Figure 1, next page, is an illustration showing the four selected sites and the estimatedareas of Patchogue that each will serve. In developing the estimated service area limitswe employed the 725 foot walking distance and used actual customer walking routestaking into consideration the use of cut through walkways, sidewalks and crosswalks.
As shown on Figure 1, the site that most closely overlays the high parking demandareas identified on the 90% occupancy maps on pages 6 and 7 and whose service areaencompasses all four CBD quadrants, a long stretch of Main Street, the Patchogue theatre,and most of the redevelopment block is Lot 7, behind Blums.
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
23/34
20
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
24/34
21
6.3 Site Comparison / Pros and Cons
The following is a basic comparison of the four parking deck sites:
6.3.a Lot 1 Municipal parking lot behind JRs
Pros: Good size, good vehicular and pedestrian accessCons: Service area does not include the Patchogue Theatre
Potential number of cars per level: 120Net parking gain for a 2-supported level garage: 205
6.3.b Lot 2 Municipal parking lot behind Library
Pros: Good size, good vehicular and pedestrian access, recent local investmentsCons: Service area barely reaches redevelopment block, relocate overhead wires
Potential number of cars per level: 140Net parking gain for a 2-supported level garage: 240
6.3.c Lot 6 Municipal parking lot behind Congregational Church
Pros: Good size, open site, proximity to Patchogue TheatreCons: Service area does not include southwest quadrant and Main Street west of Ocean
Avenue; least convenient alley access to Main Street
Potential number of cars per level: 120Net parking gain for a 2-supported level garage: 205
6.3.d Lot 7 Municipal parking lot behind Blums
Pros: Service area encompasses all four CBD quadrants, a long stretch of Main Street,the Patchogue theatre, and most of the redevelopment block
Cons: Smallest site, relocate overhead wires
Potential number of cars per level: 95Net parking gain for a 2-supported level garage: 165
6.4 Parking Garage Costs
According to O&S Associates, parking garage designers, parking garage constructioncosts in the northeast region were in the $15,000 to $17,000 per space range in 2011.Adding 5% to the high end of the 2011 range, a safe construction budget for 2012 wouldbe about $17,850 per space. Design and construction supervision costs would addanother 10% bringing the total all in estimate to about $19,635 per space.
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
25/34
22
7.0 PARKING PROGRAM PLAN7.1 A Tiered Approach
Sections 5 and 6 of this report contain operational strategies, parking expansion strategies,and parking deck construction strategies that are designed to improve parking conditionsin downtown Patchogue. Because parking problems were found to be very localized(with vacant spaces always available within a reasonable walking distance) and notwidespread in nature we believe that operational strategies and low cost parkingexpansion strategies will be sufficient and will significantly improve current parkingconditions in downtown Patchogue.
Table 1, next page, lists 17 parking improvement strategies that have been explored inthis report. We have classified these strategies into three tiers:
Tier 1 Low cost management, 20 new spaces, Less thanoperational, and physical 325 new visits $30,000improvements. per day, improved
signage, utilization,recognition andcirculation
Tier 2 Parking lot 212 to 227 AboutExpansions new spaces $2.5 million
Tier 3 Parking deck 165 to 240 $5.1 toConstruction new spaces $7.5 million
Table 1 provides greater detail of the 17 strategies and also describes the rationale,impact, estimated cost, and cost per net space gained of each strategy.
Recommendations and implementation guidelines for the tiered parking program areincluded on page 24.
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
26/34
TABLE1
PATCHOGUECBDP
ARKING
STUDY
PARKING
IMPROVEMENTSTRATEGIES
December2011
COSTPER
REF
L
OCATION
DESCRIPT
ION
RATIONALE
IMPACT
COST
NETSPACE
GAINED
5.1.a
Lot3
Convert(12)2HRlimitspaces
ImprovedBalance
12
Spaces
$300
$25
BehindRalph's
to"NoTimeLimit"Spaces
andUtilization
IncreaseLongTermsupply
5.1.b
MainStre
et/
Reducetimelimitfrom
2HR
IncreasesTurnover
21
0ParkingVisits
$1,2
00
N/A
SouthOceanAvenue
to90minute
5.1.c1
MainStre
et/
SteppedUpEnforcem
entof
IncreasesTurnover
50
ParkingVisits
$0
N/A
SouthOceanAvenue
TimeLimits
o
or
5.1.c2
MainStre
et/
InstallParkingMeters
IncreasesTurnover
50
ParkingVisits
$44,0
00/Yr
N/A
SouthOceanAvenue
$1
50,0
00peryearIncome
for5Years(Lease)
5.1.d
Lot2
Convert(6)2HRlimit
spaces
ImprovedBalance
65
ParkingVisits
$200
N/A
BehindLibrary
to30minutelimitspaces
andUtilization
5.2.b
NorthSideof
AddParallelParking
CapacityImprovement
20
spaces
$1,5
00
$75
TerryStre
et
5.1.e
AllParkin
gLots
Nameeachlotandinstall
Recognition
Qualitative
$5,0
00
N/A
entrancesignage
5.1.f
ParkingS
ystem
Prepareanddistribute
ImprovedAwareness
Qualitative
$2,5
00
N/A
InformationalPamphlet
andUtilization
5.1.g
Townwide
WayfindingSignSystem
ImprovedAwareness
Qualitative
$15,0
00
N/A
andCirculation
5.2.a1
AreaBetw
eenLot2&3
Re-construct/re-strip
efor
CapacityImprovement
40
spaces
$150,0
00
$3,7
50
add'lparking-MaximumPlan
o
or
or
5.2.a2
AreaBetw
eenLot2&3
Re-construct/re-strip
efor
CapacityImprovement
25
spaces
$190,0
00
$7,6
00
add'lparking-Landsc
apePlan
5.2.c
Lot8
Purchase15OakStre
et
LandBanking
42
spaces
$541,0
00
$12,8
80
BehindPorkStore
andexpandlot
CapacityImprovement
5.2.d
Lot1
Purchase5properties
LandBanking
14
5spaces
$1,7
50,00
0
$12,0
70
ChurchStreetLot
andexpandlot
CapacityImprovement
6.3.a
Lot1
ConstructParkingDeck
CapacityImprovement
20
5spaces(netgain)
$6,4
00,00
0
$31,2
20
ChurchStreetLot
(3Levels-2supporte
d)
6.3.b
Lot2
ConstructParkingDeck
CapacityImprovement
24
0spaces(netgain)
$7,5
00,00
0
$31,2
50
BehindLibray
(3Levels-2supporte
d)
6.3.c
Lot6-Be
hind
ConstructParkingDeck
CapacityImprovement
20
5spaces(netgain)
$6,4
00,00
0
$31,2
20
Congrega
tionalChurch
(3Levels-2supporte
d)
6.3.d
Lot7
ConstructParkingDeck
CapacityImprovement
16
5spaces(netgain)
$5,1
00,00
0
$30,9
10
BehindBlums
(3Levels-2supporte
d)
T I E R 1 T I E R 2 T I E R 3
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
27/34
24
7.2 Recommendations
It is recommended that Tier 1parking improvements be implemented in 2012. Webelieve these changes will have a material positive impact on parking conditions and will
serve the Patchogue CBD quite well for a number of years in the near term.
It is recommended that Tier 2parking lot expansions be considered on a case-by-casebasis if parking problems persist after the Tier 1 recommendations have beenimplemented. If the village has the financial capacity, it may be a worthwhile strategy tobegin land banking some of the properties identified in Sections 5.2.c and 5.2.d so theymay be in a better position to implement Tier 2 parking expansions if and when the timecomes.
It is recommended that Tier 3parking deck construction options be considered on a case-by-case basis if parking problems persist after the Tier 1 recommendations have been
implemented AND the Swezeys Block redevelopment has been built and occupied for atleast 18 months.
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
28/34
OFS
PAN
LO
T
CAT
1
213
2
167
3
172
4
59
5
109
6
191
7
97
8
36
9
74
10
40
11
83
12
174
KEY
=ON-STREETP
ARKING-2HOURLIMIT
=ON-STREETP
ARKING-NOTIMELIMIT
=MUNICIPALPARKINGLOTWITHDESIGNATIONNUMBER
=AREAOFMUNICIPALLOTWITH2HOURLIMITPARKING
FIRE
DEPT
MEDOFFICES
THEATRE
POST
OFFICE
COURT
HOUSE
BROOKHAVEN
MEDICAL
LIBRARY
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
1
2
3
4
5
NORTHWEST
QUADRANT
NO
RTHEAST
Q
UADRANT
SOUTHWEST
QUADRANT
SOUTHEAST
QUADRANT
X
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
29/34
1
14
9
9
17a
16
21
44
26
8
39
15
2
5
10
6
17b
20
22
52
27
5
40
107
3
15
11
5
18
38
23
15
28
17
41
8
4
12
12
4
19
84
24
176
29
12
42
2
5
5
13
3
20
174
25
5
30
14
43
8
6
17
14
8
31
8
44
98
7
12
15
44
32
2
45
85
8
5
16
30
33
16
46
17
34
10
47
43
35
13
48
80
36
12
49
44
37
18
50
98
38
14
51
74
52
46
57
102
53
13
58
10
54
N/A
59
35
5 5
9 8
6 0
FIRE
DEPT
MED
OFFICES
THEATRE
POST
OFFICE
COURT
HOUSE
BROOKHAVEN
MEDICAL
1
2
3
4
5
6 7
89
10
111
2
13
14
15
16
17
a
b
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
59
58
25
26
29
30
34
36
38
39
37
35
33
32
31
27
28
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
56
55
54
57
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
30/34
THURSDAY
Practical 8/18/2011
REF # Spaces Capacity 12:00 PM 2:00 PM 4:00 PM 6:00 PM 8:00 PM 10:00 PM 12:00 PM 2:00 PM 4:00 PM 6:00 PM 8:00 PM 10:00 PM 1:00 PM
1 14 12.6 12 13 11 9 13 10 6 10 10 11 12 8 13
2 5 4.5 3 2 1 3 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2
3 15 13.5 15 14 14 9 15 4 6 6 6 6 3 4 13
4 12 10.8 7 8 6 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 8
5 5 4.5 4 3 4 4 2 0 2 2 2 1 0 0 2
6 17 15.3 5 6 5 3 8 9 4 7 8 9 7 9 8
7 12 10.8 1 3 3 3 1 3 0 1 3 1 0 3 5
8 5 4.5 2 1 1 3 1 3 3 2 1 2 1 3 2
9 9 8.1 3 3 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8
10 6 5.4 2 3 2 0 0 0 2 2 3 0 0 4 9
11 5 4.5 2 2 1 5 4 4 2 5 2 4 3 3 2
12 4 3.6 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
13 3 2.7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
14 8 7.2 4 7 6 3 9 4 1 0 2 2 2 1 3
15 44 39.6 16 27 23 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14
16 30 27.0 19 26 20 14 7 0 8 7 4 2 2 1 21
17a 16 14.4 11 12 12 8 12 3 14 13 13 10 7 7 11
17b 20 18.0 9 13 9 5 13 3 15 11 10 8 10 5 11
18 38 34.2 12 20 11 15 19 10 7 9 12 9 15 13 14
19 84 75.6 19 19 15 12 10 8 8 8 11 9 11 6 18
20 174 156.6 62 71 64 65 73 97 57 68 47 57 76 64 8321 44 39.6 32 44 43 41 44 29 33 44 44 39 43 41 37
22 52 46.8 51 52 52 47 53 46 30 47 49 38 51 51 50
23 15 13.5 4 8 16 7 11 8 4 7 7 7 11 11 4
24 176 158.4 45 172 172 65 176 157 16 28 164 56 142 143 38
25 5 4.5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
26 8 7.2 5 8 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 2 2 3 6
27 5 4.5 3 4 3 1 1 0 4 2 0 1 0 2 2
28 17 15.3 13 10 12 4 9 2 11 9 10 6 6 2 11
29 12 10.8 12 7 6 3 0 0 8 9 12 7 6 1 11
30 14 12.6 13 14 13 13 14 13 15 10 12 13 15 13 14
31 8 7.2 3 8 6 5 7 3 7 6 8 5 7 8 7
32 2 1.8 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 0
33 16 14.4 15 16 14 13 16 14 14 16 14 12 16 16 13
34 10 9.0 11 11 11 10 10 11 11 9 11 13 12 10 1035 13 11.7 9 13 10 12 10 9 11 13 12 10 12 13 13
36 12 10.8 13 9 6 8 12 11 7 11 9 8 12 10 11
37 18 16.2 16 15 13 14 15 15 13 16 12 12 18 13 16
38 14 12.6 0 0 3 3 9 8 0 1 0 3 3 14 2
39 15 13.5 6 5 5 7 14 15 3 5 4 2 9 9 2
40 107 96.3 23 18 12 3 4 3 4 8 4 4 4 4 15
41 8 7.2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0
42 2 1.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
43 8 7.2 2 3 3 3 5 7 3 4 4 6 5 6 0
44 98 88.2 81 88 74 51 42 21 45 52 46 28 40 25 81
45 85 76.5 54 59 49 58 40 20 33 30 36 39 43 29 72
46 17 15.3 17 14 10 2 1 3 3 3 2 2 2 0 13
47 43 38.7 38 38 40 31 28 2 33 32 28 11 10 7 40
48 80 72.0 68 78 76 58 45 10 73 68 60 26 12 9 76
49 44 39.6 34 43 40 40 39 15 39 42 38 20 19 15 40
50 98 88.2 77 78 78 48 52 30 56 52 36 26 27 28 88
51 74 66.6 36 22 27 26 25 16 31 38 27 24 25 18 26
52 46 41.4 42 45 30 6 7 1 22 23 15 6 2 1 43
53 13 11.7 12 9 11 4 6 2 9 8 8 8 9 0 13
54 45 40.5 8 5 7 1 8 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 7
55 98 88.2 35 26 42 85 55 22 41 30 26 20 18 8 38
56 11 9.9 5 3 2 10 7 3 3 2 1 0 0 0 1
57 102 91.8 28 28 29 21 24 15 25 34 29 21 26 15 41
58 10 9.0 6 8 4 7 2 1 5 5 6 6 6 6 3
59 35 31.5 0 21 23 2 22 23 0 0 3 0 0 30 0
2006 1805.4 1027 1237 1160 885 1015 705 757 824 880 619 769 699 1091
= 90% Occupancy Or Higher
THURSDAY - JULY 21, 2011 SATURDAY - JULY 23, 2011
APPENDIX C - PARKING OCCUPANCY COUNT SUMMARY
VILLAGE OF PATCHOGUE, NY
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
31/34
APPENDIXD-1
PARKINGDEMANDM
ODEL
SWEZEY'SBLOCKRE
DEVELOPMENTPROGR
AM
RunDate:December28,
2011
SATURDAYCONDITION
Peak
Factor
Unit
Source
6am
7am
8am
9am
10am
11am
12n
1p
m
2pm
3pm
4pm
5pm
6pm
7pm
8pm
9pm
10pm
11pm
12m
BackgroundDemand
7-23-11Counts
10
12
14
20
27
35
39
45
53
42
30
38
43
52
59
55
50
48
46
5,000SFRestaurant
16.3
/1000SF
ITE
0
0
0
3
5
14
29
37
33
28
45
55
82
82
82
24
7
7
5
41,100SFGradeLevelRetail
2.97
/1000SF
ITE
2
16
33
74
92
110
122
12
1
120
107
83
68
89
84
79
54
35
24
0
18,000SFOffices
0.50
/1000SF
LevelG
0
1
5
8
9
9
8
8
9
8
7
5
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
240TownhouseUnits-Reserved
1.00
/Unit
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
24
0
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
240TownhouseRentalUnits
0.23
/Unit
Note2
54
52
49
33
39
37
36
35
35
38
40
43
44
46
46
48
49
52
54
51ApartmentRentalUnits
1.05
/Unit
Note2
52
50
48
32
38
36
35
34
34
37
39
42
43
44
45
47
48
51
52
Adjustment:RemovalofTaxisfrom"
BackgroundDemand"
-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
-1
0
-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
Credit:InternalTrips/FootTraffic
Note3
0
-3
-7
-16
-19
-25
-30
-3
2
-31
-27
-26
-25
-34
-33
-32
-15
-8
-6
-1
SafetyFactor(10%)
LGA
35
36
37
39
42
45
47
48
48
46
45
46
50
51
51
44
41
41
39
TOTALS
384
395
410
424
463
491
517
52
8
533
511
494
502
549
557
561
486
452
447
426
PEAK
Note1-CarscurrentlyparkingwithintheredevelopmentfootprintestimatedtobegeneratedbyBrickhouse,BOA,orotherusestoremain.
Note2-UsedfactorsfromI
TEandreduce
dby15%toaccountforproximitytorail/transit.
Note3-Used20%o
f"Restaurant"and"R
etail"DemandTotals
LEVELGASSOCIATES,LLC
SeeNote1
1.0RESERVEDSPACEPERTOWNH
OUSE
/ALLOTHERSPACESSHARED
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
32/34
APPENDIXD-2
PARKINGDEMANDMODEL
SWEZEY'SBLOCKR
EDEVELOPMENTPROGRAM
RunDate:December28,
2011
WEEKDAYCONDITION
Peak
Factor
Unit
Source
6am
7am
8am
9am
10am
11am
12n
1pm
2pm
3pm
4pm
5pm
6pm
7pm
8p
m
9pm
10pm
11pm
12m
BackgroundDemand
7-21-11Count
10
13
20
30
41
48
49
50
53
48
46
49
51
54
5
7
70
83
78
68
5,000SFRestaurant
13.3
/1000SF
ITE
0
0
0
1
4
11
24
31
27
23
37
45
67
67
6
7
33
17
8
3
41,100SFGradeLevelRetail
2.65
/1000SF
ITE
2
11
42
60
82
98
107
109
107
103
96
93
95
98
9
5
76
41
22
0
18,000SFOfficeSpace
2.84
/1000SF
ITE
1
8
31
47
51
51
45
47
49
48
39
26
13
5
3
2
1
0
0
240TownhouseUnits-Reserved
1.00
perUnit
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
240
240TownhouseRentalUnits-Shared
0.23
perUnit
Note2
53
46
41
40
38
36
34
33
33
33
36
39
41
43
4
7
50
51
53
54
51ApartmentRentalUnits
1.05
perUnit
Note2
51
44
40
39
36
35
33
32
32
32
35
37
40
42
4
6
49
50
51
52
Adjustment:RemovalofTaxisfrom"
BackgroundDemand"
-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
Credit:InternalTrips/FootTraffic
Note3
0
-2
-8
-13
-20
-31
-45
-52
-49
-43
-56
-63
-85
-86
-85
-48
-25
-12
-3
SafetyFactor(10%)
LevelG
36
36
41
46
49
52
53
54
54
53
53
53
55
55
5
5
52
48
45
42
TOTALS
384
386
438
479
511
530
531
534
537
527
516
508
506
508
515
514
497
476
447
PEAK
Note1-Carscurrentlyparkingwithinth
eredevelopmentfootprintestimatedtobegeneratedbyBrickhouse,BOA,orotherusestoremain
.
Note2-UsedfactorsfromI
TEandredu
cedby15%toaccountforproximitytorail/transit.
Note3-Used20%o
f"Restaurant"and
"Retail"DemandTotals
LE
VELGA
SSOCIATES,
LLC
SeeNote1
1.0RESERVEDSPACEPERRESIDENTIALUNIT/ALLOTHERSPACESSHARED
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
33/34
APPENDIXE-1
PARKINGSUPPLY&
DEMANDMODEL
SWEZEY'SBLOCKREDEVELOPMENTPROGRAM
RunDate:December28,
2011
SATURDAYCONDITION
Peak
DEMAND
Factor
Unit
Source
6am
7am
8am
9am
10am
11am
12n
1pm
2pm
3pm
4pm
5pm
6pm
7pm
8pm
9pm
10pm11pm
12m
DEMANDTOTALSFROMTABLED-1
384
395
410
424
463
491
517
528
533
511
494
502
549
557
56
1
486
452
447
426
SUPPLY
PublicLotonRedevelopmentSite(108Spaces)
Tritec
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
10
8
108
108
108
108
NewPublicLotOnLakeStreet(65Spaces)
Tritec
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
NewOn-StreetSpacesCreatedbyRedevelopment(26Spaces)
Tritec
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
On-siteResidentialReservedSpaces(293Spaces)
Tritec
293
293
293
293
293
293
293
293
293
293
293
293
293
293
29
3
293
293
293
293
PublicParkingAvailableWithin1Block
N.OceanLot(38spaces)
7-23-11Counts
30
30
30
30
30
30
31
30
29
27
26
27
29
26
23
24
25
25
25
NorthernmostPortionofChurchSt.Lo
t(85spaces)
7-23-11Counts
50
50
50
50
50
50
52
53
55
52
49
47
46
44
42
49
56
55
55
SouthernmostRowofFireHouseLot(
25spaces)
7-23-11Counts
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
NorthPortionofRailroadAvenue(15s
paces)
7-23-11Counts
10
10
10
10
10
10
12
12
13
12
12
13
15
15
15
13
11
11
11
SUPPLYTOTALS
607
607
607
607
607
607
612
612
614
608
604
604
607
602
59
7
603
609
608
608
SURPLUSOR(DEFICIT)
223
212
197
183
144
116
95
84
81
97
110
102
58
45
36
117
157
161
182
WorstCaseCondition
1.0RESERVEDSPACEPERRESID
ENTIALUNIT/ALLOTHERSPACESSHARED
-
8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study
34/34
PPENDIXE-2
ARKINGSUPPLY&DEMANDMODEL
WEZEY'SBLOCKREDEVELOPMENTPROGR
AM
nDate:December28,
2011
WEEKDAYCONDITION
Peak
MAND
Factor
Unit
Source
6am
7am
8am
9am
10am
11am
12n
1pm
2pm
3pm
4pm
5pm
6pm
7pm
8pm
9pm
10pm
11pm
12m
MANDTOTALSFROMTABLED-2
384
386
438
479
511
530
531
534
537
527
516
508
506
508
515
514
497
476
447
PPLY
licLotonRedevelopmentSite(108Spaces)
Tritec
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
wPublicLotOnLakeStreet(65Spaces)
Tritec
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
wOn-StreetSpacesCreatedbyRe
development(26Spaces)
Tritec
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
siteResidentialReservedSpaces(293Spaces)
Tritec
293
293
293
293
293
293
293
293
293
293
293
293
293
293
293
293
293
293
293
licParkingAvailableWithin1Block
OceanLot(38spaces)
7-21-11Counts
25
25
25
25
25
25
26
22
18
22
27
25
23
21
19
24
28
25
25
thernmostPortionofChurchSt.Lo
t(85spaces)
7-21-11Counts
30
30
30
30
30
30
31
28
26
31
36
31
27
36
45
55
65
65
65
thernmostRowofFireHouseLot(25spaces)
7-21-11Counts
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
thPortionofRailroadAvenue(15spaces)
7-21-11Counts
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
10
10
12
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
PPLYTOTALS
582
582
582
582
582
582
584
577
570
580
590
585
582
589
596
611
625
622
622
RPLUSOR(DEFICIT)
198
196
144
103
71
52
53
43
33
53
74
77
76
81
81
97
128
146
175
WorstCaseCondition
1.0RESERVEDSPACEPERRESIDENTIALUNIT/ALLOTHERSPACESSHARED