2013 asprs track, developing an arcgis toolbox for estimating evapotranspiration of vegetation using...
DESCRIPTION
Estimating water used by vegetated areas is very important for water resources management and water rights. Traditionally the amount of water delivered to an area is calculated by installing some measuring device (flumes, weirs, flow meters, etc.). The alternative approach presented here estimates the actual water use in a vegetated areas based on ground surface energy balance concept using the ReSET model (Remote Sensing of ET – ReSET developed by IDS group in Colorado state university) that uses satellite and Arial imagery with visible and thermal bands along with weather data to estimate daily actual crop Evapotranspiration (ET) for vegetated areas. Surface energy balance models have been proven to be a robust approach for estimating vegetation evapotranspiration. One of the main limitations of wider application of these models in water resources and irrigation management is the requirement of extensive back ground in surface energy modeling. This presentation shows the development and the application of an ArcGIS toolbox that runs an automated version of the ReSET model. The tool is compatible with NASA/USGS Landsat Legacy Project. The presented ArcGIS tool automates the model in all stages and requires minimum interference from user. The tool presented accommodates both basic and advanced users. The results using the tool were tested and validated using results from manual ReSET model runs.TRANSCRIPT
Automation of surface energy balance model {ReSET}
Aymn Elhaddad and Luis Garcia,
Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
1
Crop Water Use (ET) Monitoring System
"Courtesy: National Science Foundation"
•Ground, air- and space- borne RS of ET
2
Traditional ETc Calculation
3
Advantages of Surface Energy Balance Models Over Other Methods
Classic calculation of crop ET relies on using reference ET and a crop coefficient. Unfortunately, this methodology does not take into account the local conductions such as:
• Water shortage/Waterlogging • Crop Type • Planting dates • Salinity
4
Remote Sensing of ET Models
• Most common ones use the energy balance equation.
• Have large footprint (regional coverage). • Measure actual, not potential ET. • Several models have been developed:
SEBAL, METRIC, ReSET, SAT, ALARM, etc.
5
Using Surface Energy Balance ET is calculated as a “residual” of the energy balance
R n
G (Heat to ground)
H (Heat to air) ET
(Radiation from sun)
Remote Sensing of Evapotranspiration
LE = Rn – G – H
6
Description of Energy Balance Models
The use of the energy balance equation: Rn = LE + G + H
Net Radiation (Rn), Soil Heat Flux (G), Sensible Heat Flux (H), and Latent Energy consumed by ET (LE).
Model Rn, G and H, then determining LE as a residual. LE = Rn – G – H
7
SEB Models Limitations Imagery availability
If no images are available for a region SEB models can not be used.
Cloud cover SEB models are sensitive to clouds since clouds
impact the thermal band. Calibration In the model without ground calibration if advection
occurs it will introduce errors in the results. In the calibrated mode high quality weather data is
required.
8
Surface Energy Balance Using A Raster Concept (ReSET-Raster)
• The ReSET-Raster model is a surface energy balance model that uses Surface Energy Balance to calculate actual ET for every pixel.
• Unlike METRIC or SEBAL, ReSET generates surfaces of every variable (wind, hot, cold, ETr)
• Model main inputs 1. Aerial imagery with visible and thermal bands. 2. Ground weather data from available weather
stations. 9
ET Modeling
ReSET Model
Aerial images with visible and thermal bands ET 24 hour grid
10
Irrigation Event Captured by the ReSET Model 5/27/2006
11
ET Variability within Fields Detected by ReSET Model 7/30/2006
12
Landsat image
ReSET ET grid
Running a Surface Energy Balance Based Model Manually
To manually run SEB models users need to have a background in:
• Hydrologic science, • Behavior of soil, vegetation and water systems, • Environmental physics, • Radiation, • Aerodynamics, • Heat transfer, • Vegetation systems, • Image Processing.
The need for these expertise limits the number of model users and eventually hinders the expansion of surface energy balance models usage and applications.
2ls5_1.mdl 2ls7_1.mdl
2ls_2.mdl
2ls5_3_savi.mdl 2ls7_3_savi.mdl
3_11_14r_savi.mdl 3_11_14r_savi.mdl
ArcGIS to obtain cold and hot points shp
ArcGis for Albedo Coef
3.mdl
pre_it.mdl
H_r.mdl
pre_it_r1.mdl pre_it_rain.mdl pre_it_rain_r1.mdl
Rah.mdl 4.mdl
SI_r1.mdl
H.mdl
Rah.mdl
4.mdl
SI.mdl H.mdl
SI.mdl
H.mdl
H_r.mdl
H_r.mdl
50_51_reset1_point.mdl
50_evapo_fr_1.mdl
50_evapo_fr_2.mdl
50_evapo_fr_2r.mdl
50_evapo_fr_2r1.mdl
1dem.mdl EB Model Manual Mode
Automated ReSET Model Under ArcGIS 10.1
15
Surface Energy Balance Model Components
16
Location characteristics
Anchor points selection
Surface Albedo Energy balance
calculations
Model First Two Components
Multi layer satellite imagery Image header
file
Location Geographic Characteristics
Digital Elevation
map
•Reflectance of light energy •Vegetation indices
(NDVI,TOA-ALBEDO)
Surface Albedo calculation
18
2_
sw
radiancepathtoa
τ
ααα
−=
τsw = 0.75 + 2
10-5
z FAO 56
(Chen and Ohring, 1984; Koepke et al., 1985)
αpath_radiance ~ 0.03 Bastiaanssen (2000)
Iterative Process for Calculating Surface Albedo
NDVI mask
Surface Albedo Calculate Surface Albedo
using initial albedo coefficient
TOA Albedo
Update Albedo coefficient Fail Pass Recalculate
Surface Albedo
Mean value of surface albedo within NDVI
mask
Final Surface Albedo
Surface Albedo
Check
NDVI image (left) and NDVI mask (right) for Albedo
20
NDVI mask for Surface Albedo
21
Modeling of Fluxes (Rn = LE + G + H)
• In the energy balance equation various fluxes are modeled as follows:
• Net Radiation (Rn) = Gain – Losses Rn = (1 – α) Rs + RL – RL – (1-εo) RL
• Soil Heat Flux (G) – Empirical equation
G = (Ts/α (0.0038α + 0.0074α2) (1 – 0.98NDVI4)) Rn
• Sensible Heat Flux (H) H = ρaCp (T1 – T2)/rah
Broad band emissivity
Z2
Z1
rah
rah = aerodynamic resistance to heat transport (T1 – T2) = dT = near surface temperature diff.
dT H
Cp = air specific heat ρa = air density
22
Modeling of Fluxes (cont.) H = ρaCp (T1 – T2)/rah • Due to the difficulty of computing T1 – T2 the model
uses a dT function.
H = ρaCp (dT)/rah
Z2
Z1
rah
rah = aerodynamic resistance to heat transport (T1 – T2) = dT = near surface temperature diff.
dT H
Cp = air specific heat ρa = air density
23
dT Function • To determine dT, two extreme pixels are selected (cold and hot
anchor pixels). • The cold pixel is selected from a well water vegetated area where
dTcold= 0 • The hot pixel is selected as a very dry land area where it is
expected that LE = 0. dThot = (Rn - G) rah / (ρaCp)
• A linear relationship is assumed to exist between the surface temperature and dT, which then enables the calculation of H for each pixel.
24
H = Rn – G – (LE = 0)
Selection of Hot and Cold Anchor Points
25
NDVI Filter
Surface Albedo Filter
Clumping
Sieving
Proximity Weather Stations
Sorting Anchor points
Surface temperature
Checking the Value of the Cold Anchor Points
26
Proximity Check for Cold Anchor Points
27
Solving for H • H = ρaCpa (dT)/rah We find H for every pixel
LE = Rn – G – H
is latent heat of vaporization (j/kg) representing the
energy required to evaporate a unit mass of water To extrapolate from instantaneous ET to 24-hour ET, ETrF is multiplied by 24-hour ETr.
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
280 290 300 310 320 330 340
dT
T (Kelvin)
T and dT
28
LE and EF Calculation • Using LE the evaporative fraction (EF) is calculated:
EF = LE/(Rn – G) • It assumes that this fraction remains constant
throughout the day, therefore can be used in determining daily ET as shown below:
ET24 = 86,400 * EF * (Rn24 - G24)/ λv
• Under calm weather conditions or moderate advection for non-irrigated areas, the assumption of EF being constant can be acceptable.
Evap./Available energy
29
Model Inputs (Acquired data sets)
• Imagery data: Satellite imagery and header file.
• Weather data: Daily and hourly reference ET as single point values or grids
and daily wind run.
• Location data: Shapefile of weather station locations and shapefile for the
area of interest.
30
Model Inputs (User entered parameters)
• User enters several values for the creation of masks and the filtering process.
• Those processing parameters are critical but do not require advanced background.
• The model initial run uses default parameter values (which are suitable under normal crop growing conditions).
• Model parameters are fine-tuned in a learning process through a feed back from the area of interest the model is being applied on.
31
Advantages of Automating the Use of SEB Models
• Help the expansion of surface energy balance models applications.
• Facilitate the mass production of actual ET maps on several temporal and spatial resolutions (current and historical).
• Provide valuable inputs to near real time irrigation scheduling models and ground water models.
32
Limitations of Automation of the Use of SEB Models
• The automated model was used in different areas in the US (Colorado, California, Texas) and overseas (Spain, Egypt and Saudi Arabia) with performances that matched or surpassed the manual mode. However, the automation process is unable to accommodate these two limitations:
• Pixels affected by clouds. • Bad pixel data ( Landsat 7), image boundaries.
33
Overcoming Limitations of Automation
1. Imagery preprocessing can be done to overcome the previously mentioned limitations. – Clouds:
Image pixels affected by clouds should be masked and replaced with no data values. – Bad pixel data:
• Satellite images should be clipped at the borders to eliminate pixels with bad data at the edges of the image.
• Bad stripes in satellite imagery (Landsat 7) should be filled with same image date adjacent data or masked.
2. Running the model in a semi automated mode where the user can manually select hot and cold anchor points.
34
ReSET Raster Applications • South Platte Basin – Estimation of irrigation efficiency
and validation of pumping records, development of Kc.
• Arkansas River Basin – Estimation of actual crop water use, Aquifer recharge/depletion, impact of salinity on ET, calculation of canal service area water use.
• Palo Verde Irrigation District – Estimation of actual crop water use.
• Aragona Irrigation District in Spain – Estimation of actual crop water use.
• Nile Delta in Egypt- Evaluate irrigation canal system efficiency. 35
ReSET Model Modes
• ReSET is available in full automatic and semi automatic mode for all Landsat satellites imagery (LS 5, LS 7, LS 8) and MODIS.
• Colorado State University will be offering a
three day training on the ReSET model this fall, for more information please email [email protected]
36
Questions
37